Transparency data
DLUHC Government Major Projects Portfolio Data March 2024
Updated 16 January 2025
Download CSV 19.1 KB
| GMPP ID Number | Project Name | Department | Annual Report Category | Description / Aims | IPA Delivery Confidence Assessment (A Delivery Confidence Assessment of the project at a fixed point in time, using a three-point scale, Red – Amber – Green; definitions in the IPA Annual Report on Major Projects) | SRO Delivery Confidence Assessment (A Delivery Confidence Assessment of the project at a fixed point in time, using a three-point scale, Red – Amber – Green; definitions in the IPA Annual Report on Major Projects) | Departmental commentary on actions planned or taken on the IPA RAG rating. | Project - Start Date (Latest Approved Start Date) | Project - End Date (Latest Approved End Date) | Departmental narrative on schedule, including any deviation from planned schedule (if necessary) | Financial Year Baseline (£m) (including Non-Government Costs) | Financial Year Forecast (£m) (including Non-Government Costs) | Financial Year Variance (%) | Departmental narrative on budget/forecast variance for 2023/24 (if variance is more than 5%) | TOTAL Baseline Whole Life Costs (£m) (including Non-Government Costs) | Departmental Narrative on Budgeted Whole Life Costs | TOTAL Baseline Benefits (£m) | Departmental Narrative on Budgeted Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLUHC_0138_2223-Q1 | Affordable Homes Programme | DLUHC | Infrastructure and Construction | The Affordable Homes Programme (AHP) allocates grant funding to Local Authorities and Housing Associations to help support the capital costs of developing affordable housing for rent or sale. | Not set | Amber | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the Delivery Confidence Assessment rating at 23/24-Q4 remained at Amber(SRO rating). This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: We continue to assess the delivery confidence of the programme as amber. _x000D_ _x000D_ The programme continues to implement flexibilities to address cost pressures facing the sector. | 2021-01-03 | 2029-04-30 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's end-date at 23/24-Q4 remained schedule to finish on 2029-04-30. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: The project's end-date is April 2029. | 2792.17 | 2252.65 | -19 | The budget variance exceeds 5%. This is primarily due to the following factors. The cost profile was re-baselined in 2023. | 11609 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree Whole Life Cost at 23/24-Q4 increased from 11583m. to 11609m. This is primarily due to the following factors. The whole life cost increased from 11583m to 11609m as a result of a small increase in resource costs due to increased commercial and legal fees. Capital costs have remained fixed. | 20796 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 remained at 20796m. Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 remained at 20796m. |
| DLUHC_0181_2223-Q3 | Digital Planning Programme | DLUHC | Government Transformation and Service Delivery | The Digital Planning Programme will enable a modern and efficient 21st century planning system. | Amber | Not set | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the Infrastructure Project Authority's Delivery Confidence Assessment rating at 23/24-Q4 remained at Amber. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: We continue to assess the delivery confidence of the programme as amber. _x000D_ _x000D_ The programme continued to focus on IPA recommendations relating to programme wide adoption, engagement and innovation strategies. | 2020-09-01 | 2027-03-30 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's end-date at 23/24-Q4 decreased from 2027-12-31 to 2027-03-30. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: The project's end-date is March 2027. This has changed to align with the agreed funding period. | 31.05 | 31.9 | 3 | The budget variance is inferior or equal to 5%. | 151 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree Whole Life Cost at 23/24-Q4 increased from 150m. to 151m. This is primarily due to the following factors. Project Baseline Whole Life Cost remians at 150.01 (m) as reoported in 22-23. WLC included expected programme budget to continue delivery beyond the spending review period (25-26 and beyond). _x000D_ _x000D_ Future year funding adjusted to reflect increased focus on software adoption and development (largest proportion of the digital planning budget) to better align budget with programme delivery plans. 17.9m of 24-25 budget is allocated to for LPAs to deliver software adoption. _x000D_ _x000D_ Programme optimism bias has been reallocated to fund increased workforce and PropTech adoption work. | 232 | The project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 is 232m. Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 2324-Q4 increased from 0m to 232m. |
| CO_0025_2021-Q3 | Electoral Integrity | DLUHC | Government Transformation and Service Delivery | The Electoral Integrity Programme (EIP) seeks to implement the changes arising from the Elections Act 2022, which sets the provisions for the administration and conduct of elections. | Amber | Not set | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the Infrastructure Project Authority's Delivery Confidence Assessment rating at 23/24-Q4 remained at Amber. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: We continue to assess the delivery confidence of the programme as amber. _x000D_ _x000D_ The programme continued to focus on IPA recommendations, including those related to successful delivery of May 2024 elections and the next General Election. | 2017-01-11 | 2025-03-31 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's end-date at 23/24-Q4 remained schedule to finish on 2025-03-31. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: The project's end-date is April 2025. | 57.3 | 39.17 | -32 | The budget variance exceeds 5%. This is primarily due to the following factors. Some costs have moved into the following financial year. | 420 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree Whole Life Cost at 23/24-Q4 increased from 417m. to 420m. This is primarily due to the following factors. The whole life cost increased from 417m to 420m due to confirmed costs in the Full Business Case. | 0 | The project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 is 0m. Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 remained at 0m. |
| MHCLG_0008_2122-Q1 | Freeports | DLUHC | Infrastructure and Construction | This programme supports economic growth through the creation of new Freeports across the UK. | Amber | Not set | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the Infrastructure Project Authority's Delivery Confidence Assessment rating at 23/24-Q4 remained at Amber. This is primarily due to the following factors. "As at March 24: We continue to assess the delivery confidence of the programme as amber. _x000D_ _x000D_ The programme continues to focus on IPA recommendations to maximise the success of individual Freeports. " | 2019-02-08 | 2027-12-31 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's end-date at 23/24-Q4 remained schedule to finish on 2027-12-31. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: The project's end-date is December 2027. | 38.04 | 38.04 | 0 | The budget variance is inferior or equal to 5%. | 229 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree Whole Life Cost at 23/24-Q4 increased from 226m. to 229m. This is primarily due to the following factors. Whole life costs have increased from 226m to 229m due to technical support required in the Devolved Administrations. | 0 | The project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 is 0m. Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 remained at 0m. |
| MHCLG_0001_1920-Q3 | Grenfell Site and Programme | DLUHC | Infrastructure and Construction | The Grenfell Site and Programme aims to deliver the vision of the Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission for a fitting memorial to be built on the Grenfell Tower site and working towards a Ministerial decision on the future of the Tower. | Not set | Amber | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the Senior Responsible Owner's Delivery Confidence Assessment rating at 23/24-Q4 remained at Amber. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: We continue to assess the delivery confidence of the programme as amber._x000D_ _x000D_ The programme continues to focus on the IPA recommendations focussed on supporting the Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission (GTMC) to launch the design competition. | 2019-07-15 | 2030-01-31 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's end-date at 23/24-Q4 increased from 2029-03-30 to 2030-01-31. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: The project's end-date is January 2030. This is an extension of one year due to the timing of the decision being made on the future of the tower. | 22.31 | 16.1 | -28 | The budget variance exceeds 5%. This is primarily due to the following factors. Some costs have moved into future financial years to accommodate the revised memorial timeline. | 290 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree Whole Life Cost at 23/24-Q4 decreased from 291m. to 290m. This is primarily due to the following factors. The cost profile was rebaselined. | 0 | The project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 is 0m. Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 remained at 0m. |
| MHCLG_0004_2021-Q4 | Housing Infrastructure Fund | DLUHC | Infrastructure and Construction | The Housing Infrastructure Fund (HIF) provides funding for infrastructure projects, which once built, will unlock housing capacity in areas of high demand. The programme is expected to unlock the construction of circa 260k homes. | Amber | Not set | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the Infrastructure Project Authority's Delivery Confidence Assessment rating at 23/24-Q4 decreased from Red to Amber. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: We continue to assess the delivery confidence of the programme as amber._x000D_ _x000D_ To maintain delivery confidence, the programme continues to embed new processes developed through the business case reset, along with implementing IPA recommendations. | 2016-12-30 | 2028-03-31 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's end-date at 23/24-Q4 remained schedule to finish on 2028-03-31. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: The project's end-date is March 2028. This is an extension from March 2026 as agreed in a revised business case in 2023. | 499.4 | 543.3 | 9 | The budget variance exceeds 5%. This is primarily due to the following factors. The 2023 refreshed HIF business case re-baselined the cost profile and unlocked delivery for a number of projects that had been stalled, enabling some local authorities to deliver faster than forecast. | 4257 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree Whole Life Cost at 23/24-Q4 decreased from 4334m. to 4257m. This is primarily due to the following factors. Whole life cost decreased from 4334m to 4257m due to a re-baseline in 2023. | 11600 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 2324-Q4 decreased from 18400m. to 11600m. Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 2324-Q4 decreased from 18400m. to 11600m. This is due to projects descoping or withdrawing from the programme on deliverability grounds. |
| MHCLG_0017_2122-Q2 | Levelling Up Fund | DLUHC | Infrastructure and Construction | The Levelling Up Fund (LUF) brings together the Department for Transport, the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, and HMT to allocate funding in local infrastructure projects across the three investment themes of transport; town centre regeneration; and culture. | Not set | Amber | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the Delivery Confidence Assessment rating at 23/24-Q4 remained at Amber(SRO rating). This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: We continue to assess the delivery confidence of the programme as amber._x000D_ _x000D_ The programme continues to focus on the IPA recommendations to maintain delivery confidence of allocated grant funding and local authority delivery. | 2021-03-03 | 2026-03-31 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's end-date at 23/24-Q4 remained schedule to finish on 2026-03-31. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: The project's end-date is March 2026. | 1064 | 1064 | 0 | The budget variance is inferior or equal to 5%. | 4800 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree Whole Life Cost at 23/24-Q4 remained at 4800m. This is primarily due to the following factors. Whole Life Costs have not changed | 0 | The project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 is 0m. Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 remained at 0m. |
| DLUHC_0135_2223-Q1 | Levelling Up Home Building Fund | DLUHC | Infrastructure and Construction | The Levelling Up Home Building Fund allocates funding to small and medium sized housebuilders and residential development lenders to diversify and build resilience in the housing market as well as foster innovation including Modern Methods of Construction. | Not set | Amber | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the Senior Responsible Owner's Delivery Confidence Assessment rating at 23/24-Q4 remained at Amber. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: We continue to assess the delivery confidence of the programme as amber. | 2020-11-25 | 2031-03-31 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's end-date at 23/24-Q4 remained schedule to finish on 2031-03-31. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: The project's end-date is March 2031. | 507 | 191.17 | -62 | The budget variance exceeds 5%. This is primarily due to the following factors. Some costs have moved into future financial years. | 2206 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree Whole Life Cost at 23/24-Q4 remained at 2206m. This is primarily due to the following factors. Whole Life Costs have not changed | 842 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 remained at 842m. Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 remained at 842m. |
| DLUHC_0250_2324-Q1 | Remediation Portfolio | DLUHC | Infrastructure and Construction | The overarching aim of the portfolio is to oversee the remediation of residential buildings 11 metres and over in height with unsafe external wall systems through five building safety programmes, and to bring them up to the minimum life-safety standard. | Amber | Not set | The Infrastructure Project Authority's Delivery Confidence Assessment rating at 23/24-Q4 is Amber. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: We continue to assess the delivery confidence of the programme as amber._x000D_ _x000D_ The programme continues to focus on the IPA recommendations to maintain delivery confidence in addressing unsafe cladding remediation. | 2023-06-26 | 2036-03-31 | The project's end-date at 23/24-Q4 is 2036-03-31. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: The project's end-date is March 2036. | 732 | 676.49 | -8 | The budget variance exceeds 5%. This is primarily due to the following factors. The variance relates to lower than expected RDEL costs due to delays in recruitment. | 9915 | The project's departmental-agree Whole Life Cost at 23/24-Q4 is 9915m. This is primarily due to the following factors. Whole Life Costs have not changed. | 6748 | The project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 is 6748m. The project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 is 6748m. |
| MHCLG_0007_2122-Q1 | Towns Fund | DLUHC | Infrastructure and Construction | The Towns Fund aims to regenerate towns and high streets through long-term economic and productivity growth. This investment focuses on urban regeneration, digital and physical connectivity, skills, heritage, and enterprise infrastructure. | Not set | Amber | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the Senior Responsible Owner's Delivery Confidence Assessment rating at 23/24-Q4 remained at Amber. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: We continue to assess the delivery confidence of the programme as amber. | 2018-12-01 | 2026-03-30 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's end-date at 23/24-Q4 remained schedule to finish on 2026-03-30. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: The project's end-date is March 2026. | 761.76 | 806.3 | 6 | The budget variance exceeds 5%. This is primarily due to the following factors. Some costs have moved into future financial years. | 3106 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree Whole Life Cost at 23/24-Q4 increased from 3104m. to 3106m. This is primarily due to the following factors. Whole Life Costs increased from 3104m to 3106m. | 9878 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 remained at 9878m. Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 remained at 9878m. |
| MHCLG_0005_2021-Q4 | UK Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre | DLUHC | Infrastructure and Construction | The objective of the UK Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre programme is to build a new memorial to the Holocaust in Victoria Tower Gardens in Westminster to honour the six million Jewish men, women and children that were murdered during the Holocaust. A learning centre will also be located with the memorial to explore the British relationship to the Holocaust, including the role of the British Parliament and democratic institutions. | Not set | Red | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the Senior Responsible Owner's Delivery Confidence Assessment rating at 23/24-Q4 remained at Red. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: We continue to assess the delivery confidence of the programme as red. This is because the programme does not yet have planning consent. The Holocaust Memorial Bill was introduced in the House of Commons on the 23 February 2023 remove the obstacle to planning consent, and passed Second Reading unopposed in June 2023. When the Bill is passed, this status is expected to change. | 2015-01-27 | 2029-01-31 | The project's end-date at 23/24-Q4 is 2029-01-31. This is primarily due to the following factors. As at March 24: The project's end-date is January 2029. | 8 | 1.45 | -82 | The budget variance exceeds 5%. This is primarily due to the following factors. Some costs have moved into future financial years. | 138 | Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree Whole Life Cost at 23/24-Q4 increased from 124m. to 138m. This is primarily due to the following factors. Whole Life Costs increased from 124m to 138m as agreed in a revised business case, due to programme delays and inflation. | 0 | The project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 is 0m. Compared to financial year 22/23-Q4, the project's departmental-agree monetised benefits at 23/24-Q4 remained at 0m. |