Guidance

TQ Reviews of Marking and Moderation - file format

Updated 17 October 2023
Download CSV 9.12 KB

Name Description Position Validation Regular Expression Description of Regular Expression / Accepted values
ReportingDate Date the file was due to be submitted to Ofqual regardless of when it was actually uploaded (this date will be made available by Ofqual) 1 ^ (0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01]) [/](0[1-9]|1[012])[/] (20)\d\d $ or ^(20)\d\d[-](0[1-9]|1[012])[-](0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])$ The date in the following format: day (2 digits), forward slash, month (2 digits), forward slash, year (4 digits), or: year (4 digits), a dash, month (2 digits), a dash, day (2 digits)
AssessmentSeries Assessment series data relates to, for example June 2023 2 ^(June)([][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])$ Full month name and year of Assessment series for example June 2023
AwardingOrganisation Acronym of the awarding organisation 3 ^.{1,100}$ A valid AO Acronym. 1 to 100 characters accepted Note: value must be consistent within the file.
QualificationNumber Unique identifier for the TQ as it appears in Ofqual’s Register of Regulated qualifications 4 ^.{1,10}$ Valid Qualification Number. 1 to 10 characters accepted
ComponentCode Unique identifier for the component which the assessment relates to (assigned by the awarding organisation) 5 ^.{1,10}$ 1 to 10 characters
SubComponentType TQ sub-component which the assessment falls under (Core Exam, Core Project, Occupational Specialism) 6 ^(Core Exam|Core Project|Occupational Specialism)$ Accepted values: • Core Exam • Core Project • Occupational Specialism
AssessmentCode Unique identifier for the assessment (assigned by the awarding organisation) 7 ^.{1,10}$ 1 to 10 characters
ULN Unique Learner Number 8 ^.{0000000001,9999999999}$ A numeric value between 0000000001 and 9999999999
UCI Unique Candidate Identifier 9 ^.{1,13}$ A valid Unique Candidate Identifier Note: enter -2 if not available
UKPRN UK Provider Reference Number 10 ^.{10000000,99999999}$ A numeric value between 10000000 and 99999999
NCN Centre ID – National Centre Number 11 ^\d{1,5}$ Up to 5-digit integer Note: enter -2 if not available
OriginalAssessmentRawMark Original Assessment Raw Mark 12 ^\d{1,3}$ Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable
PostReviewAssessmentRawMark Post-Review Assessment Raw Mark 13 ^\d{1,3}$ Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable
OriginalAssessmentUMSMark Original Assessment UMS Mark 14 ^\d{1,3}$ Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable
PostReviewAssessmentUMSMark Post-Review Assessment UMS Mark 15 ^\d{1,3}$ Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable
OriginalSubComponentRawMark Original Sub-component Raw Mark 16 ^\d{1,3}$ Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable
PostReviewSubComponentRawMark Post-Review Sub-component Raw Mark 17 ^\d{1,3}$ Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable
OriginalSubComponentUMSMark Original Sub-component UMS Mark 18 ^\d{1,3}$ Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable
PostReviewSubComponentUMSMark Post-Review Sub-component UMS Mark 19 ^\d{1,3}$ Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable
OriginalComponentRawMark Original component Raw Mark 20 ^\d{1,3}$ Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable
PostReviewComponentRawMark Post-Review component Raw Mark 21 ^\d{1,3}$ Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable
OriginalComponentUMSMark Original component UMS Mark 22 ^\d{1,3}$ Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable
PostReviewComponentUMSMark Post-Review component UMS Mark 23 ^\d{1,3}$ Number between 0 and 999 allowing decimals Note: enter -2 if not applicable
OriginalAssessmentGrade Original Assessment Grade 24 ^(A*|A|B|C|D|E|Q|U|X|Distinction|Merit|Pass|-2)$ Accepted values: • A* • A • B • C • D • E • U • Distinction • Merit • Pass Note: enter -2 if not applicable
PostReviewAssessmentGrade Post-Review Assessment Grade 25 ^(A*|A|B|C|D|E|Q|U|X|Distinction|Merit|Pass|-2)$ Accepted values: • A* • A • B • C • D • E • U • Distinction • Merit • Pass Note: enter -2 if not applicable
OriginalSubComponentGrade Original Sub-Component Grade 26 ^(A*|A|B|C|D|E|Q|U|X|Distinction|Merit|Pass|-2)$ Accepted values: • A* • A • B • C • D • E • U • Distinction • Merit • Pass Note: enter -2 if not applicable
PostReviewSubComponentGrade Post-Review Sub-Component Grade 27 ^(A*|A|B|C|D|E|Q|U|X|Distinction|Merit|Pass|-2)$ Accepted values: • A* • A • B • C • D • E • U • Distinction • Merit • Pass Note: enter -2 if not applicable
OriginalComponentGrade Original Component Grade 28 ^(A*|A|B|C|D|E|Q|U|X|Distinction|Merit|Pass|-2)$ Accepted values: • A* • A • B • C • D • E • U • Distinction • Merit • Pass Note: enter -2 if not applicable
PostReviewComponentGrade Post-Review Component Grade 29 ^(A*|A|B|C|D|E|Q|U|X|Distinction|Merit|Pass|-2)$ Accepted values: • A* • A • B • C • D • E • U • Distinction • Merit • Pass Note: enter -2 if not applicable
TypeOfReview Type of review 30 ^(Administrative Error Review|Review of Marking|Review of Moderation)$ Accepted values: • Administrative Error Review • Review of Marking • Review of Moderation
Reason Information provided to centres to explain a change in marks 31 ^(Work not seen or marked by original examiner|Error in totalling of marks by original examiner (e.g. examiner did not add up marks correctly)|Error in transferring marks from paper script to exam processing system (e.g. discrepancy between marks on script and marks on exam board system)|Error in inputting marks on online marking system by original examiner (e.g. mark incorrectly input)|Error in centre submitting marks (e.g. incorrect mark submitted for non-examination assessment)|Original marking/processing had incorrectly dealt with a candidate rubric error and/or answer in wrong answer space.|Original marker unable to read candidate response (e.g. illegible handwriting)| Application of special consideration during post-results (where the component/qualification was also subject to a review of marking) |Missing script located at review (e.g. original script not marked).|Processing error (e.g. scanning scaling grading)|Auto-marking error (e.g. wrong answer key)|Outcome of malpractice investigation (e.g. mark change due to estimation of marks)|Marking – misapplication of levels based mark scheme|Marking – misapplication of points-based mark scheme|Marking – unusual candidate response (e.g. candidate response not covered by the mark scheme)|Moderation – misapplication of criteria by original moderator (e.g. error by original moderator)|No mark change – grade change due to changes on other component(s)|Note: enter -2 if not applicable)$ Accepted values: • Work not seen or marked by original examiner • Error in totalling of marks by original examiner (e.g. examiner did not add up marks correctly) • Error in transferring marks from paper script to exam processing system (e.g. discrepancy between marks on script and marks on exam board system) • Error in inputting marks on online marking system by original examiner (e.g. mark incorrectly input) • Error in centre submitting marks (e.g. incorrect mark submitted for non-examination assessment) • Original marking/processing had incorrectly dealt with a candidate rubric error and/or answer in wrong answer space. • Original marker unable to read candidate response (e.g. illegible handwriting) • Application of special consideration during post-results (where the component/qualification was also subject to a review of marking) • Missing script located at review (e.g. original script not marked). Processing error (e.g. scanning scaling grading) • Auto-marking error (e.g. wrong answer key) • Outcome of malpractice investigation (e.g. mark change due to estimation of marks) • Marking – misapplication of levels based mark scheme • Marking – misapplication of points-based mark scheme • Marking – unusual candidate response (e.g. candidate response not covered by the mark scheme) • Moderation – misapplication of criteria by original moderator (e.g. error by original moderator) • No mark change – grade change due to changes on other component(s)
DateReceived Date when the review request was received or date when the moderator received the sample 32 ^ (0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01]) [/](0[1-9]|1[012])[/] (20)\d\d $ or^(20)\d\d[-](0[1-9]|1[012])[-](0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])$ The date in the following format: day (2 digits), forward slash, month (2 digits), forward slash, year (4 digits), or: year (4 digits), a dash, month (2 digits), a dash, day (2 digits)
DateCompleted Date review is completed 33 ^ (0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01]) [/](0[1-9]|1[012])[/] (20)\d\d $ or^(20)\d\d[-](0[1-9]|1[012])[-](0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])$ The date in the following format: day (2 digits), forward slash, month (2 digits), forward slash, year (4 digits), or: year (4 digits), a dash, month (2 digits), a dash, day (2 digits)
CompletedWithinDeadline Whether or not the review was completed within the deadline 34 ^(Yes|No|TBD)$ Accepted values: • Yes • No • TBD