{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":2,"sheets":["Cover Note ","Register"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":1,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Cover Note ","index":0,"n_rows":20,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":20,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[7,2,7,22],[1,1,1,13],[2,1,2,13],[4,1,4,22],[5,2,5,22],[6,2,6,22],[8,2,8,22],[9,2,9,22],[10,2,10,22],[12,2,12,22],[14,2,14,22]]}
[]
[null,"Accessing the Register"]
[null,"Please note that you will need to download a copy of this spreadsheet in order to be able to search or apply filters to it"]
[]
[null,"Standard Definitions"]
[null,"Additional Provision","\"Additional Provision\" means amendments to the Bill introduced following deposit of the Bill into Parliament"]
[null,"Additional Provision 1","\"Additional Provision 1 (AP1)\" means the first additional provision to the Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017"]
[null,"Additional Provision 2","\"Additional Provision 2 (AP2)\" means the second additional provision to the Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 8 February 2019"]
[null,"Code of Construction Practice","“the COCP” means the Code of Construction Practice that is prepared for the Bill to control the construction of the Proposed Scheme and that is finalised on Royal Assent of the Bill"]
[null,"Environmental Minimum Requirements","“Environmental Minimum Requirements” means as defined at Paragraph 4.4 of HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper E1: Control of Environmental Impacts (as amended from time to time)"]
[null,"Nominated Undertaker","\"the nominated undertaker\" refers to the body or bodies appointed by the Secretary of State to exercise the powers conferred by the Bill to construct \nand maintain the Proposed Scheme. The nominated undertaker may be HS2 Ltd, or it may be another body or bodies appointed to oversee the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme"]
[null,"Parliamentary Plans","\"Parliamentary Plans\" means the plans deposited in Parliament"]
[null,"Promoter","\"the Promoter\" means the Secretary of State for Transport"]
[null,"Royal Assent","\"Royal Assent\" means the date when Royal Assent is given to the Bill"]
[null,"Secretary of State","\"the Secretary of State\" means the Secretary of State for Transport"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null," "]

{"sheet":"Register","index":1,"n_rows":1565,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":1565,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1557,1,1557,10],[1543,1,1543,10],[1546,1,1546,10],[1549,1,1549,10],[1551,1,1551,10],[1553,1,1553,10],[1530,1,1530,10],[1532,1,1532,10],[1534,1,1534,10],[1536,1,1536,10],[1541,1,1541,10],[1555,1,1555,10],[1517,1,1517,10],[1521,1,1521,10],[1524,1,1524,10],[1526,1,1526,10],[1528,1,1528,10],[1501,1,1501,10],[1505,1,1505,10],[1510,1,1510,10],[1512,1,1512,10],[1515,1,1515,10],[1488,1,1488,10],[1492,1,1492,10],[1494,1,1494,10],[1497,1,1497,10],[1499,1,1499,10],[1468,1,1468,10],[1470,1,1470,10],[1477,1,1477,10],[1479,1,1479,10],[1486,1,1486,10],[1447,1,1447,10],[1450,1,1450,10],[1457,1,1457,10],[1461,1,1461,10],[1466,1,1466,10],[1419,1,1419,10],[1421,1,1421,10],[1424,1,1424,10],[1431,1,1431,10],[1435,1,1435,10],[1402,1,1402,10],[1404,1,1404,10],[1411,1,1411,10],[1413,1,1413,10],[1417,1,1417,10],[1380,1,1380,10],[1382,1,1382,10],[1384,1,1384,10],[1388,1,1388,10],[1395,1,1395,10],[1357,1,1357,10],[1360,1,1360,10],[1371,1,1371,10],[1375,1,1375,10],[1377,1,1377,10],[1322,1,1322,10],[1330,1,1330,10],[1333,1,1333,10],[1346,1,1346,10],[1354,1,1354,10],[1289,1,1289,10],[1293,1,1293,10],[1305,1,1305,10],[1307,1,1307,10],[1313,1,1313,10],[1183,1,1183,10],[1196,1,1196,10],[1218,1,1218,10],[1242,1,1242,10],[1269,1,1269,10],[1137,1,1137,10],[1139,1,1139,10],[1155,1,1155,10],[1169,1,1169,10],[1181,1,1181,10],[1090,1,1090,10],[1094,1,1094,10],[1099,1,1099,10],[1106,1,1106,10],[1123,1,1123,10],[1017,1,1017,10],[1034,1,1034,10],[1058,1,1058,10],[1067,1,1067,10],[1081,1,1081,10],[946,1,946,10],[959,1,959,10],[973,1,973,10],[984,1,984,10],[995,1,995,10],[858,1,858,10],[870,1,870,10],[890,1,890,10],[904,1,904,10],[919,1,919,10],[814,1,814,10],[819,1,819,10],[841,1,841,10],[849,1,849,10],[856,1,856,10],[770,1,770,10],[780,1,780,10],[795,1,795,10],[807,1,807,10],[811,1,811,10],[702,1,702,10],[715,1,715,10],[719,1,719,10],[737,1,737,10],[753,1,753,10],[644,1,644,10],[652,1,652,10],[660,1,660,10],[667,1,667,10],[698,1,698,10],[569,1,569,10],[579,1,579,10],[603,1,603,10],[623,1,623,10],[634,1,634,10],[500,1,500,10],[506,1,506,10],[528,1,528,10],[538,1,538,10],[555,1,555,10],[470,1,470,10],[475,1,475,10],[480,1,480,10],[485,1,485,10],[494,1,494,10],[413,1,413,10],[420,1,420,10],[438,1,438,10],[463,1,463,10],[357,1,357,10],[360,1,360,10],[378,1,378,10],[383,1,383,10],[387,1,387,10],[346,1,346,10],[351,1,351,10],[353,1,353,10],[260,1,260,10],[269,1,269,10],[275,1,275,10],[328,1,328,10],[336,1,336,10],[405,1,405,10],[256,1,256,10],[258,1,258,10],[239,1,239,10],[241,1,241,10],[243,1,243,10],[247,1,247,10],[248,1,248,10],[342,1,342,10],[344,1,344,10],[237,1,237,10],[48,1,48,10],[76,1,76,10],[202,1,202,10],[210,1,210,10],[221,1,221,10],[250,1,250,10],[252,1,252,10],[254,1,254,10],[245,1,245,10],[2,1,2,10],[4,1,4,10],[0,0,0,3],[0,4,0,10],[7,1,7,10],[226,1,226,10],[232,1,232,10],[233,1,233,10],[235,1,235,10]]}
["Please consult the change log for any specific details on amendments to the register",null,null,null,"Phase 2a Register of Undertakings and Assurances"]
["U&A ref id","Sections","Petition no (where relevant)","Beneficiary (to whom)  ","U&A Text (where relevant)","Subject","Reference","Date issued","Type","Location of U&A","District / Borough / Unitary Authority"]
[null,"Section A: undertakings and assurances that have general application"]
["A174","N/A\t\t\t\t\t\t\t","N/A","General\t","57. I now undertake, on behalf of the Secretary of State to this House in the following terms. Insofar as the environmental minimum requirements are not directly enforceable against any person appointed as the nominated undertaker, the Secretary of State will take such steps as he considers reasonable and necessary to secure compliance with those requirements. This undertaking will be entered in the register.\r\n\r\n58. This undertaking applies also in any case where a statutory undertaker is carrying out development for, or in connection with, the Phase 2A project in reliance on the planning permission enjoyed in consequence of the provision of the Bill, of which the marginal note is extension of permitted development rights.\r\n\r\n","Environmental minimum requirements","Paragraphs 57 and 58,\r\nTranscript 001 ","2018-03-19","Undertaking","Routewide","Routewide"]
[null,"Series B Information Papers: Understanding the hybrid Bill","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["A1","N/A","N/A","General\t","4.1 Following Royal Assent to the Bill, a nominated undertaker is expected to be appointed to construct and maintain Phase 2a of HS2. Any nominated undertaker will be contractually obliged to comply with all relevant undertakings and assurances made by the Promoter in regard to construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme.","Compliance with undertakings and assurances","Paragraph 4.1, Information Paper B5: Compliance with Undertakings and Assurances. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A2","N/A","N/A","General\t","3.1 The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) is the independent safety and economic regulator for Britain's railways. Its functions include setting Network Rail’s funding and outputs as the monopoly operator of the network, and enforcing delivery and ensuring fair access to that network.\r\n\r\n3.2 Its high-level objectives are set in section 4(1) of the Railways Act 1993. Although they could be interpreted as requiring the ORR to facilitate the construction of the Proposed Scheme, the Government considers that it is appropriate to include a specific objective to that effect. This will help to avoid confusion about the ORR's role in relation to the Proposed Scheme and its role in relation to the wider rail network. The same approach was taken in the HS2 Phase One Act and the Crossrail Act. This new objective will sit alongside and is not intended to override the ORR’s existing objectives.\r\n\r\n3.3 Once the construction of the Proposed Scheme is complete, the Secretary of State will lay regulations before Parliament that remove this specific item from the objectives of the ORR, as the Proposed Scheme will then be part of the operational railway network and fully encompassed by the existing legislation on the ORR's role.\r\n","Office of Rail and Road (ORR)","Paragraphs 3.1 to 3.3, Information Paper B7: Railway Powers in the Hybrid Bill. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
[null,"Series C Information Papers: Property and compensation","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["A3","N/A","N/A","General\t","3.2 During the passage of the Bill and following Royal Assent, the Secretary of State will undertake a continuing communications exercise with the owners and occupiers of property that is expected to be subject to compulsory acquisition for the Proposed Scheme. \r\n\r\n3.3 As a minimum, this communications exercise will include correspondence sent to property owners and occupiers, at a stage when the Proposed Scheme has reached an appropriate level of detailed design, giving them:  an indication of whether the property which they own or occupy is likely to be required, and if part only of the property is likely to be required, which part; and  the best estimate available of the date on which such property is likely to be required.  \r\n","Continuing Communication","Paragraphs 3.2 to 3.3, Information Paper C1: Information for Property Owners. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A4","N/A","N/A","General\t","3.5 HS2 Ltd (and, in due course, the nominated undertaker) will maintain a helpdesk which will enable all property owners and occupiers to contact HS2 Ltd and its property advisers.\r\n ","Continuing Communication","Paragraph 3.5, Information Paper C1: Information for Property Owners. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A5","N/A","N/A","General\t","5.3 To assist existing businesses that do need to move due to the Proposed Scheme, assistance will be provided to find suitable alternative premises, the Secretary of State will establish an agency service where applicable at his expense (or that of his nominated undertaker). The agency service will help firms to identify their property needs and advise them on what suitable property might then be available where necessary. Alternatively or where appropriate, the Secretary of State (or the nominated undertaker) will pay those businesses the reasonable costs of appointing their own agent to find suitable premises. Close contacts will be established with property agents, landowners, developers and local authorities to ensure that reliable and effective information is provided.\n\n5.5 The agency scheme is expected to be established to commence work at least one year before construction of the main works begin. \n","Assistance to business","Paragraphs 5.3 and 5.5, Information Paper C1: Information for Property Owners. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A6","N/A","N/A","General\t","5.6 The Secretary of State recognises the importance for existing businesses being able to plan their relocations with as much advance information as is reasonably practicable, to ensure a smooth transition of their operations from one location to another. Therefore, once the Bill has received Royal Assent, the Secretary of State or his nominated undertaker will make arrangements to provide businesses with a longer period in which to relocate than the three months specified in the Bill, where this is practicable. In such cases, the Secretary of State’s overall aim will be to provide as long a period as is practicable, commensurate with the co-ordinated progress of the works. \r\n","Assistance to business","Paragraph 5.6, Information Paper C1: Information for Property Owners. Version 1.1 (also referenced in Information Paper C7 - Business Relocation -paragraph 5.2) ","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A7","N/A","N/A","General\t","3.2  Where land is only temporarily required - for example, during the construction period - the nominated undertaker will discuss with the owner the temporary use of that land.","Land Acquisition and Compensation Code","Paragraph 3.2, Information Paper C2: Rural Landowners and Occupiers Guide. Version 1.1\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A191","N/A","N/A","General\t","8.4 During construction, the nominated undertaker will maintain access to the rural landowner's land under controlled conditions where necessary and reasonably practicable, and without prejudice to the landowner's rights to disturbance compensation. \r\n","Accommodation Works","Paragraph 8.4 Information Paper C2: Rural Landowners and Occupiers guide . Version 1.1\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A192","N/A","N/A","General\t","8.5 Where private utilities for a holding are affected by the proposed works, alternative supplies will be provided where practicable. \r\n\r\n","Utilities","Paragraph 8.5 Information Paper C2: Rural Landowners and Occupiers guide . Version 1.1\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A193","N/A","N/A","General\t","8.6 Where the public utilities for a holding are affected by the proposed works, except when agreed otherwise, alternative supplies will be installed before the existing supply is disconnected. \r\n\r\n","Utilities","Paragraph 8.6 Information Paper C2: Rural Landowners and Occupiers guide . Version 1.1\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A8","N/A","N/A","General\t","3.4  If it is practicable to acquire a smaller area of land without compromising the Secretary of State’s ability to secure the construction and implementation of the Proposed Scheme in a timely and economic manner, and it becomes clear that not all the land within limits is required, the Secretary of State will not generally seek to acquire this land and will be prepared to give necessary assurances to the landowners in question.\r\n","Acquisition of smaller areas of land within limits","Paragraph 3.4, Information Paper C3: Land Acquisition Policy. Version 1.3\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A9","N/A","N/A","General\t","4.2 Worksites are often formed from a number of different land parcels in different ownership and fall into two categories:\r\n- where the nature of the site or part of the site will not materially change and no new railway works will be constructed on the site. Often these sites can be returned to their original use. In these cases, if the landowner wishes, and it is economic for the Secretary of State to do so, he will normally be willing to agree to take the land temporarily rather than acquiring the freehold interest. When considering whether it is economic to do so, the Secretary of State may require the compensation for the temporary occupation of land to be agreed prior to exercising powers of acquisition under the Bill as enacted;\r\nand\r\n- where the nature of the site will materially change (e.g. through demolition of existing buildings or construction of railway works on the site) or where land or property is planned to be developed, the freehold interest will be acquired.\r\n4.3 In respect of land that is and will remain in long term agricultural or forestry use only, the Secretary of State will normally consider it economic to exercise temporary possession powers where practicable. There are some exceptions to this policy – for more details, see the Farmers and Growers Guide -https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hs2-guide-for-farmers-and-growers\r\n4.4 In considering the question of material change, the Secretary of State will apply the approach set out in the Crichel Down Rules\r\nThe Crichel Down Rules can be viewed at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/compulsory-purchase-process-and-the-crichel-down-rules-guidance\r\n","Worksites and other Temporary Land Requirements","Paragraphs 4.2 to 4.4, Information Paper C3: Land Acquisition Policy. Version 1.3\r\n\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A10","N/A","N/A","General\t","6.1 The Homeowner Payment (HOP) scheme for the Proposed Scheme will be launched after Royal Assent. HOP will be available for property owners living in rural areas near the route of the Proposed Scheme, where the line is not in a deep tunnel. Eligible property owners will be able to apply for a cash payment of £8,000, £16,000 or £24,000 depending on how close they live to the line of route. The HOP scheme will operate within a fixed ‘HOP zone’, 120 metre to 300 metres either side of the centre-line of the route.\r\n\r\n6.2 A claim may be made at any time following Royal Assent of the Bill.\r\n\r\n6.3 More details of the scheme are available at https://assets.hs2.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2020/05/18131308/DIGITAL_CS_HOP_GuidanceApForm.pdf","Home Owner Payment","Paragraphs 6.1 to 6.3, Information Paper C5: Generalised Blight. Version 1.1.\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A11","N/A","N/A","General\t","4.1  Where any land has been acquired compulsorily for the construction of the Proposed Scheme and is no longer required for the satisfactory completion of the works, or not required in connection with the operation of the Proposed Scheme, it will be sold subject to the Crichel Down Rules. ","General Approach","Paragraph 4.1, Information Paper C6: Disposal of Surplus Land. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A12","N/A","N/A\t","General\t","5.1  Where the Secretary of State intends to dispose of an interest in a site to which the Crichel Down Rules apply, holders of Qualifying Interests will, subject to the provisions of this Policy, be given first opportunity to acquire that interest at the market value before it is offered to the general market.\r\n","Market Value","Paragraph 5.1, Information Paper C6: Disposal of Surplus Land. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A13","N/A","N/A","General\t","5.2  The Secretary of State will determine the nature of the interest to be offered and the terms of any transfer. In so doing he will have regard to the following principles: \r\n∙\tthe proper completion and operation in the public interest of the works as authorised by the Bill; \r\n∙\tthe paramount requirement to protect the future safe and efficient operation of the railway; \r\n∙\tthe need to fulfil any undertaking given by the Secretary of State in respect of the Bill or comply with any legal obligations to which he is subject; \r\n∙\tthe need to secure in the public interest the carrying out of development or redevelopment associated with the works, in accordance with the planning, environmental and heritage considerations applicable to the sites affected; and\r\n∙\tthe need for the land disposal to achieve the best value reasonably obtainable. \r\n","Guiding Principles","Paragraph 5.2 Information Paper C6: Disposal of Surplus Land. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A14","N/A","N/A","General\t","6.1  The holders of the following \"Qualifying Interests\" may qualify for the offer back of an interest under the terms of this policy:\r\n- former freeholders of the whole or part of a site; or\r\n- where the freeholder does not wish to buy back the site, the former leaseholder who had a lease of the property which had an unexpired term of more than 21 years at the time the property is being disposed of, may (at the discretion of the Secretary of State) be offered the freehold interest;\r\n- the successors of anyone who would have fallen into either of the above categories where, had the property not been acquired, the land interest would clearly have devolved upon those successors under a former owner's will; or\r\n- where there was fragmented ownership of their site at the date the property was acquired or occupied for railways works under the provisions of the HS2 Bill as enacted, a consortium of former owners who have indicated a wish to purchase the land collectively; and\r\n- in certain circumstances where a dwelling has a sitting tenant at the time of the proposed disposal, the freehold will first be offered to the sitting tenant. If the tenant declines to purchase the freehold it will then be offered to the former owner although this may be subject to the tenants continued occupation. It should be noted however that this does not apply to agricultural units and only applies to certain types of tenancy agreement.\r\n\r\n","Qualifying interests","Paragraph 6.1 Information Paper C6: Disposal of Surplus Land. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A15","N/A","N/A\t","General\t","4.1  Experience suggests that in the great majority of cases businesses will be able to use their compensation payments and the open property market to relocate their operations. To assist in this process the Secretary of State will establish at its own cost an agency service to assist those businesses on an individual basis, that will have land taken for the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme.  In the alternative and where appropriate, the Secretary of State or the nominated undertaker, will pay those businesses the reasonable costs of appointing their own agent to find suitable premises.\r\n","Practical assistance with relocation","Paragraph 4.1, Information Paper C7: Business Relocation. Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A16","N/A","N/A","General\t","6.1  As a discretionary measure, not required by the Compensation Code, financial support may be offered in advance of taking possession to enable a business’ relocation by:\r\n- payment of up to 90% of the nominated undertaker’s estimate of the compensation, to support cash flow;\r\n- payment of reasonable interim professional fees, to support cash flow; and\r\n- early acquisition and leaseback of a business’ existing site to allow a new property to be acquired and developed while the business continues to operate at its current premises.","Financial Assistance with Relocation","Paragraph 6.1, Information Paper C7: Business Relocation. Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A17","N/A","N/A","General\t","7.18  In addition, recognising the public interest in mitigating the impacts of the Proposed Scheme on agricultural businesses along the route, the Secretary of State accepts that the criteria may be satisfied in relation to the replacement of facilities which are critical to the operation of an agricultural business, whether or not the business has a wider importance in relation to the local, regional or national economy. All cases will be considered on their merits in accordance with the Compensation Code and will be subject to the submission by the claimant of an appropriate business-case.","Powers to Reinstate Businesses within the Bill Limits","Paragraph 7.18, Information Paper C7: Business Relocation. Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A18","N/A","N/A","General\t","3.1  Prior to Royal Assent of the Bill, HS2 Ltd will reimburse an agent’s reasonable fee in facilitating a landowner entering into an early access agreement (‘EAA’) for essential survey works. ","Costs Inside the Scope of Reimbursement","Paragraph 3.1, Information Paper C9: Recovery of Costs by Property Owners. Version 2.0","2018-02-01","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A19","N/A","N/A","General\t","3.2  In respect of statutory blight and express purchase, HS2 Ltd will pay reasonable professional fees if the application is accepted. \r\n","Costs Inside the Scope of Reimbursement","Paragraph 3.2, Information Paper C9: Recovery of Costs by Property Owners. Version 1.0","2017-07-17","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A20","N/A","N/A","General\t","3.3  In respect of the Rural Support Zone, HS2 Ltd will pay reasonable legal fees in respect of a deed of receipt for all cash offers up to £500 plus vat. However, HS2 Ltd will not pay legal fees in respect of Voluntary Purchase.\r\n","Costs Inside the Scope of Reimbursement","Paragraph 3.3, Information Paper C9: Recovery of Costs by Property Owners. Version 1.0","2017-07-17","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A21","N/A","N/A","General\t","3.4  In respect of the Homeowner Payments Scheme (HOP), HS2 Ltd will pay reasonable legal fees of up to £500 plus vat in respect of a contract of receipt for the purpose of receiving a payment under the HOP scheme.","Costs Inside the Scope of Reimbursement","Paragraph 3.4, Information Paper C9: Recovery of Costs by Property Owners. Version 1.0","2017-07-17","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A22","N/A","N/A","General\t","3.1  The nominated undertaker will establish a small claims scheme, modelled on those operated for the construction of the Crossrail and the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, to provide a mechanism for settling minor construction related residential, business or agricultural claims, using a speedy process and without the need for a formal Tribunal hearing. ","Description of Small Claims Scheme","Paragraph 3.1, Information Paper C10: Small Claims Scheme. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A23","N/A","N/A","General\t","3.3  The nominated undertaker will be required by the Secretary of State to appoint an administrator to deal with small claims upon start of construction.","Description of Small Claims Scheme","Paragraph 3.3, Information Paper C10: Small Claims Scheme. Version 1.1\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A24","N/A","N/A","General\t","5.1 In recognition of these new burdens, HS2 Ltd and DfT, in conjunction with DCLG, have previously undertaken a New Burdens Assessment, in relation to Phase One of HS2. This was undertaken to establish which of the activities carried out by local authorities represent a new financial burden on them and those activities not considered eligible for additional funding. This assessment will be also be used in relation to the Proposed Scheme.\r\n5.2 Table 1 sets out those activities that are expected to place a new burden on local authorities in relation to the Proposed Scheme, based on the assessment undertaken in relation to Phase One of HS2. HS2 Ltd and DfT will make funding available to local authorities to meet their reasonable costs for time spent on these activities, in line with the New Burdens Doctrine.\r\n","New Burdens Assessment","Paragraphs 5.1 to 5.2, Information Paper C12: Local Authority Funding and New Burdens. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A25","N/A","N/A","General\t","5.4  As with all major infrastructure projects however, local authority involvement with the Proposed Scheme will evolve over time. The Secretary of State will therefore require the nominated undertaker and the DfT to maintain a dialogue with local authorities prior to and during construction of the Proposed Scheme to re-assess whether or not there are any other Proposed Scheme related activities not identified in the assessment, for which local authorities should be reimbursed. ","New Burdens Assessment","Paragraph 5.4, Information Paper C12: Local Authority Funding and New Burdens. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A26","N/A","N/A","General\t","5.5  Where local authorities themselves consider that new financial burdens are placed on them in the run up to and during construction of the Proposed Scheme, they should provide HS2 Ltd and DfT with detailed evidence to support their claim for additional funding. Where this evidence meets the New Burdens Doctrine’s criteria of a new financial burden the local authority’s reasonable costs will be reimbursed, even if that activity was previously considered exempt from funding. For example, it is not currently expected that the Proposed Scheme will create a new burden on local authorities to deal with public enquiries relating to its construction, as the nominated undertaken will be required to operate a 24hr helpline to deal with such enquiries from members of the public. However, if it transpires that members of the public do not use this line and instead call their local authority and a new burden can be evidenced then the local authority’s reasonable costs would be reimbursed.","New Burdens Assessment","Paragraph 5.5, Information Paper C12: Local Authority Funding and New Burdens. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A194","N/A","N/A","General\t","5.4 The nominated undertaker will in all cases aim for early communication with land owners where Schedule 2 access for surveys will be required. The nominated undertaker will rely on Schedule 2 but will endeavour wherever reasonably practicable to give a landowner or its appointed agent (and all occupiers) more than the minimum 14 days’ written notice of its intention to take access to land for the purpose of survey required in the Bill, and will make the landowner/agent/occupier aware of its rights to claim for damage under Schedule 2. \r\n","Approach following Royal Assent.","Paragraph 5.4 Information Paper C13:Site Access for surveys. Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A27","N/A","N/A","General\t","8.1  The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to reimburse property owners for the reasonable cost they incur in remedying material physical damage arising from ground settlement caused by the authorised works, provided: \r\n- the damage is caused by the nominated undertaker’s works; \r\n- the owner gives not less than 28 days notice in writing to the nominated undertaker of the proposal to carry out the repair work; \r\n- the owner takes reasonable steps to obtain three competitive quotes for the repairs beforehand where required by the nominated undertaker; and \r\nany claim is made before the end of the period of two years from the date of opening for public traffic of the railway comprised in the authorised works in the vicinity of the building, or if later, the end of the period of three months from the day on which any monitoring specific to the building ceased (see paragraph 5.2 above).","Repairs","Paragraph 8.1, Information Paper C14: Ground Settlement. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A28","N/A","N/A","General\t","10.1  The Promoter has developed a Deed which the owner of a building may request. This is a formal legal undertaking concerning settlement, giving effect to the matters set out in this paper. The qualifying criteria for the Deed are attached as Annex A and the Deed itself, the terms of which are subject to change whilst the Bill is in Parliament, as Annex B. Subject to paragraph 11.1 below, and to paragraph 4.1 of the qualifying criteria, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker concerned to enter into a deed in substantially the form of the final version of those terms, in accordance with the procedures set out in the qualifying criteria, with eligible owners complying with those procedures. It is not necessary to enter into the deed in order to benefit from the process set out in this paper. ","Settlement Deed","Paragraph 10.1, Information Paper C14: Ground Settlement. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A195","N/A","N/A","General\t","5.1 Requirements for monitoring will be confirmed by the settlement report during detailed design. Selected buildings in risk/damage category 3 or above will be monitored during tunnel construction. Monitoring for category 2 and below will be covered by the general background surface monitoring undertaken to confirm ground movements are within predictions. If unexpected movements occur they will be fully investigated and, if necessary, modifications made to the tunnelling method and/or protective works taken to safeguard the building. In addition to this, general settlement monitoring will be carried out over the whole area affected by settlement.  \r\n","Monitoring","Paragraph 5.1 Information Paper C14: Ground Settlement. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A196","N/A","N/A","General\t","5.2 Where practicable, it is proposed to carry out a full year of area background monitoring to establish seasonal trends, with building specific monitoring commencing at least one month prior to commencement of the works. Monitoring will continue until all potentially damaging settlement due to the HS2 works has ceased. This is defined as when the rate of settlement is less than or equal to 2mm/annum.  \r\n","Monitoring","Paragraph 5.2 Information Paper C14: Ground Settlement. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A197","N/A","N/A","General\t","6.1 It is intended that the primary form of mitigation will be to use good tunnelling practice, including continuous working, erecting linings immediately after excavation and providing tight control of the tunnelling process to reduce the magnitude of settlement. Where these are considered insufficient to mitigate the risk of damage to buildings as forecast in the Phase 3 assessment, intrusive mitigation measures will be considered. These may include direct works on the building, as well as ground treatment around and beneath the building. These three categories are described in more detail below:  \r\n∙\tat-source measures. These include all actions taken from within the tunnel, shaft or box excavation during its construction to reduce the magnitude of ground movements generated at source;  \r\n∙\tground treatment measures. These comprise methods of reducing or modifying the ground movements generated by tunnelling/shaft/box excavation by improving or changing the engineering response of the ground. Categories of ground treatment include: compensation grouting, which involves injecting grout into the ground above the tunnel to compensate for the ground loss at the tunnel face; permeation or jet grouting which involves the creation of stiffer ground to reduce settlement; and control of ground water to avoid changes which could potentially cause ground movement; and \r\n∙\tstructural measures. These methods reduce the impact of ground movements by increasing the capacity of a building or structure to resist, modify or accommodate those movements. Typical measures would include underpinning or jacking. Underpinning involves the introduction of a new strengthened foundation system to a building or structure potentially affected by settlement. Jacking is a technique whereby a system is introduced between the structure and its existing foundations to compensate for the settlement.  \r\n","Protective Measures","Paragraph 6.1 Information Paper C14: Ground Settlement. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A198","N/A","N/A","General\t","7.1 Defect surveys will be undertaken on all properties assessed to experience 10mm or more of settlement in the assessment carried out under section 4 above with respect to the nominated undertaker’s structural excavations. These will capture the condition of the properties immediately prior to tunnel construction commencing in an area. They are a written and photographic record of existing cracking and the state of the finishes and structures. They will be carried out by a chartered building surveyor commissioned by the nominated undertaker at the nominated undertaker’s cost but in joint names with the building owner and any other persons as the nominated undertaker may determine. Owners are free to commission their own survey but this will be at their own cost since the nominated undertaker's survey is an objective survey/record of pre-existing defects and is not intended to draw any conclusions as to the cause.  ","Survey","Paragraph 7.1 Information Paper C14: Ground Settlement. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A199","N/A","N/A","General\t","7.2 An electronic copy of the report [described in U&A Ref ID A198: para 7.1] will be available to the owner on request.","Survey","Paragraph 7.2 Information Paper C14: Ground Settlement. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A200","N/A","N/A","General\t","7.3 If, following the construction of the Proposed Scheme's tunnels or other sub-surface works in the vicinity of the building, the owner responsible for repairing a building reasonably believes damage has occurred then he should notify the nominated undertaker in writing before the end of the period of two years from the date of opening for public traffic of the railway comprised in the authorised works in the vicinity of the building, or if later, the end of the period of three months from the day on which any monitoring specific to the building ceased. A second survey will then be undertaken by the nominated undertaker’s surveyor to record changes from the first survey. The owner may request his own surveyor to attend when the second survey is undertaken and to comment on the draft survey report produced by the nominated undertaker. Reasonable professional fees (agreed in advance) incurred by the owner in making a successful claim will be reimbursed by the nominated undertaker. ","Survey","Paragraph 7.3 Information Paper C14: Ground Settlement. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A201","N/A","N/A","General\t","9.4 The relevant local authority will be consulted on the results of the listed building assessment reports for listed buildings subject to Phase 3 assessment and the proposals for protective measures, if any are required. Historic England will also be consulted in relation to listed buildings subject to Phase 3 assessment where they would normally be notified or consulted on planning applications or listed building consent applications (as set out in DETR and DCMS Circular 1/01).  \r\n","Listed Buildings","Paragraph 9.4 Information Paper C14: Ground Settlement. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A202","N/A","N/A","General\t","9.5 When considering the need and type of protective measures, due regard will be given to the sensitivity of the particular features of the building which are of architectural or historic interest and the sensitivity of the structure of the building to ground movement. Where the assessment highlights potential damage to the features of the building which it will be difficult or impossible to repair and/or if that damage will have a significant effect on its heritage value, the assessment may recommend appropriate measures to safeguard those features either in-situ or by temporary removal and storage off-site if those with relevant interest(s) in the building consent.  \r\n","Listed Buildings","Paragraph 9.5 Information Paper C14: Ground Settlement. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A203","N/A","N/A","General\t","9.6 The form of monitoring of listed buildings will be determined based on the results of the assessment process.  \r\n","Listed Buildings","Paragraph 9.6 Information Paper C14: Ground Settlement. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A204","N/A","N/A","General\t","9.7 If repair works are necessary, the arrangements for their carrying out or for reimbursement referred to in section 8 above will apply. Reimbursable costs will include the costs of any necessary expert advice from a person suitably qualified to advise on heritage issues. The carrying out of the relevant works will however require the consent of those with relevant interest(s) in the building","Listed Buildings","Paragraph 9.7 Information Paper C14: Ground Settlement. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
[null,"Series D Information Papers: Construction","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["A29","N/A","N/A","General","3.1  The Promoter and the nominated undertaker will seek to ensure that: \r\nthe design is safe, efficient, and meets with the requirements of whole life operation and maintenance alongside initial buildability;\r\nthe design contributes to the Government’s pursuit of sustainable development, as set out in the National Planning Policy Framework, which involves seeking positive improvements in the quality of the built, natural and historic environment, as well as in people’s quality of life; \r\n- the design of all visible elements of the built and landscaped environment in both rural and urban areas are sympathetic to their local context, environment and social setting;\r\n- the design cohesion is achieved through a strong aesthetic ethos and a recognisable architectural language;\r\n- the design is developed through engagement to seek peoples' views and ideas on the aesthetic design of the visible buildings and permanent structures; \r\n- the design has a culture of cost awareness to give cost/quality decisions which achieve best value for the funders;\r\n- the design innovation is encouraged to generate best value to funders, users and those affected by the railway; and\r\n- the design considers the passenger experience.","Design development and public engagement \r\n","Paragraph 3.1, Information Paper D1: Design. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A30","N/A","N/A","General","5.6  The Phase 2a Planning Forum, once established, will consider common designs for certain structures. Discussions between the nominated undertaker and the relevant planning authority will determine the appropriateness of the common designs to the local environment. ","Design development and public engagement \r\n","Paragraph 5.6, Information Paper D1: Design. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A31","N/A","N/A","General","5.7  The Planning Memorandum, currently in draft, provides the commitment that the nominated undertaker will engage in proportionate forward discussions about prospective requests for approval with the qualifying authority and statutory consultees. Forward discussions will, as relevant, include design development, submission dates and planning committee cycles.","Design development and public engagement  \r\n","Paragraph 5.7, Information Paper D1: Design. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A32","N/A","N/A","General","6.1 The Promoter recognises the importance of public engagement in the design development process. The exact scope and nature of public engagement will depend on the element being designed. For example, the project would expect a higher degree of public engagement on those parts of the railway that have the most significant impact on people.\r\n\r\n6.2 The Promoter plans to adopt the following approach for public engagement in design development:\r\n- Key design elements - the nominated undertaker will engage the public on the design development of key elements of infrastructure - including main viaducts and maintenance buildings in sensitive areas. The engagement exercise is likely to focus on engaging the public in the locality where the infrastructure is located. These key design elements are outlined in Table 1 at the end of this paper.\r\n- Common design elements - the nominated undertaker will develop standard or common designs for certain permanent structures associated with the railway (such as road-bridges, foot-bridges, noise barriers). The Promoter will undertake wider public engagement on design development for common design elements, including for example interactive on-line materials, with associated local and route-wide publicity.","Design development and public engagement \r\n","Paragraphs 6.1 and 6.2, Information Paper D1: Design. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A33","N/A","N/A","General","7.1 The HS2 Independent Design Panel has been set up to provide professional expertise and advice, acting as an advisor and critical friend to HS2 Ltd. It brings together a comprehensive range of design disciplines. The HS2 Independent Design Panel’s remit is route wide and includes Phase 2a.\r\n\r\n7.2 Sadie Morgan has been appointed Chair of the HS2 Design Panel, and a pool of panel members covering all design disciplines has been appointed to independently assist the design challenge. The Design Panel will assist HS2 Ltd through advice, and HS2 Ltd will work in partnership with a range of organisations, including planning authorities.\r\n\r\n7.3 The aim will be to deliver a high standard of design that is also cost-effective and sustainable. Further information on the role of the Panel and its experts can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hs2-design-panel\r\n","HS2 Independent Design Panel","Paragraphs 7.1 to 7.3, Information Paper D1: Design. Version 1.0","2017-07-17","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A34","N/A","N/A","General","3.11  Where reasonably practicable, temporary connections for construction compounds will be made locally to existing utility services (i.e. electricity, water, data, foul sewers and surface water drainage), to reduce the need for generators, storage tanks and associated traffic movements.\r\n","Temporary connections for construction compounds","Paragraph 3.11, Information Paper D2: Construction Compounds. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A35","N/A","N/A","General","5.1  The nominated undertaker will require its contractors to apply, and to comply with, the requirements of the CoCP and will ensure the use of best practicable means to minimise the effect of the construction site on the local environment.\r\n","Environmental Controls","Paragraph 5.1, Information Paper D2: Construction Compounds. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A36","N/A","N/A","General","2.1 The Secretary of State will ensure that a Construction Commissioner is appointed to cover Phase 2a by the time construction begins. \r\n2.2 A Construction Commissioner will be appointed to deal with complaints which, in the view of the complainant, have not been dealt with satisfactorily by the nominated undertaker.","Construction Commissioner","Paragraphs 2.1 to 2.2, Information Paper D4: Construction commissioner. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A37","N/A","N/A","General","4.1 An independent Construction Commissioner will be appointed by the Promoter. The Construction Commissioner will be monitored by an independent body.\r\n4.2 The precise terms of reference for the Construction Commissioner will be established by the independent body, made up of a variety of project stakeholders.","Construction Commissioner","Paragraphs 4.1 to 4.2, Information Paper D4: Construction commissioner. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A38","N/A","N/A","General","4.1  HS2 Ltd will seek to apply the following principles of inclusive design:\r\n- place people at the heart of the design process - use of the railway will be easy and will cause the minimum of stress, fatigue and anxiety. There will be enough space and sufficient access, regardless of a user's body size, posture or mobility, at all parts of the network that are intended to be accessible to the public and staff; \r\n- acknowledge diversity and difference - people with a diverse range of abilities will find the design useful and accessible. The design will take account of a range of  access requirements including hearing, sight, mobility, and cognitive processing, mental ill health and neurodiversity;\r\n- offer choice where a single design solution cannot accommodate all users - the design will be flexible enough to incorporate individual preferences and abilities;\r\n- provide for flexibility in use - the design can adapt to changing uses and demands; and\r\n- provide buildings and environments that are convenient and enjoyable to use - the design is easy to understand and use, regardless of the user's previous experience, knowledge and capability. Information is communicated effectively, regardless of environment or conditions (such as lighting) or the user's abilities.\r\n","Inclusive Design Principles","Paragraph 4.1, Information Paper D6: Inclusive Design Policy. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A39","N/A","N/A","General","6.1  HS2 Ltd will cascade its inclusive design approach to consultancies and other parties working on the project and has already produced an inclusive design strategy which includes inclusive design standards as a technical requirement into the programme. HS2 Ltd will ensure these are embedded and integrated across all facets of design and delivery of the design.","Inclusive Design Assurance","Paragraph 6.1, Information Paper D6: Inclusive Design Policy. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A40","N/A","N/A","General","6.2  A design assurance process will be implemented to monitor and measure the delivery of inclusive design standards within the project and to ensure that inclusive design remains a core component of the design of the Proposed Scheme. ","Inclusive Design Assurance","Paragraph 6.2, Information Paper D6: Inclusive Design Policy. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A41","N/A","N/A","General","6.4  The HS2 Design Panel will act in an advisory capacity, providing a constructive critique and challenging decisions in the delivery of the stated design ambitions of the Proposed Scheme.","Inclusive Design Assurance","Paragraph 6.4, Information Paper D6: Inclusive Design Policy. Version 1.1","2019-02-15","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A42","N/A","N/A","General","4.4  Working with the utility companies, the nominated undertaker will undertake further work to identify and protect all utility plant and equipment affected by the Proposed Scheme. On a site-specific basis, this work will also include preliminary site investigations: these will confirm the accuracy of existing records in identifying the location of underground infrastructure. Even with these precautions, there remains a risk that unrecorded infrastructure may be encountered, especially in locations of old apparatus or in densely developed urban locations. In advance of commencing any construction work, specific contingency plans will be prepared to manage this risk. ","Planning and Design","Paragraph 4.4, Information Paper D8: Maintenance of Public Utilities. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A43","N/A","N/A","General","5.3  Wherever possible, when the work is carried out, the new equipment will be installed and commissioned before the existing infrastructure is disconnected. However, in some circumstances a period of disconnection may be essential to allow safe completion of the work. Where this is the case, the nominated undertaker will agree appropriate arrangements (such as planned night-time or weekend closures) with the relevant utility operator. Significant planned service outages or road closures will be notified to residents in advance. ","Implementation","Paragraph 5.3, Information Paper D8: Maintenance of Public Utilities. Version 1.1\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A44","N/A","N/A","General","5.4  Before starting construction, the nominated undertaker will establish procedures with the utility operators for the management and mitigation of unforeseen events. ","Implementation","Paragraph 5.4, Information Paper D8: Maintenance of Public Utilities. Version 1.1\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A45","N/A","N/A","General","6.3  Contractors that undertake utility diversions for the nominated undertaker will be required to establish and maintain community liaison arrangements with the owners and occupiers of property affected by their work. The contractors will be required to produce advance information sheets that will be circulated at least two weeks before the construction works are due to start, where it is reasonably possible to do so.","Community Liaison","Paragraph 6.3, Information Paper D8: Maintenance of Public Utilities. Version 1.1\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A46","N/A","N/A","General","4.1  The perimeter of the worksites will be marked out either by hoardings, fences or specialist screens. As well as providing security, the perimeter will make the site as unobtrusive as possible to local surroundings and in some cases will act as a temporary noise barrier.","Hoardings, fencing and screening\r\n","Paragraph 4.1, Information Paper D9: Worksite Security. Version 1.0\r\n","2017-07-17","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A47","N/A","N/A","General","4.7  Residents and businesses located close to hoardings will be consulted on their design, materials and construction to reduce impacts on the access to and visibility of their premises.\r\n","Hoardings, fencing and screening","Paragraph 4.7, Information Paper D9: Worksite Security. Version 1.0","2017-07-17","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A48","N/A","N/A","General","5.3  Where hoardings affect access to, or obscure visibility of, businesses or community facilities, signs will be displayed to notify highway users that the businesses remain open. The nominated undertaker will signpost diversionary routes to the businesses, and to alternative community facilities if a community facility is closed.\r\n","The Code of Construction Practice\r\n","Paragraph 5.3, Information Paper D10: Maintaining Access to Residential and Commercial Property during Construction. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A49","N/A","N/A","General","5.4  The nominated undertaker will communicate regularly with affected parties throughout the period of the construction works","The Code of Construction Practice","Paragraph 5.4, Information Paper D10: Maintaining Access to Residential and Commercial Property during Construction. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A50","N/A","N/A","General","6.1  Where reasonably practicable, vehicular access will be maintained to residential and commercial premises. \r\n","Access","Paragraph 6.1, Information Paper D10: Maintaining Access to Residential and Commercial Property during Construction. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A51","N/A","N/A","General","6.2  The nominated undertaker will ensure that people with restricted mobility continue to have access to services and buildings where such access and services are temporarily disrupted during the construction works.\r\n","Access","Paragraph 6.2, Information Paper D10: Maintaining Access to Residential and Commercial Property during Construction. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A52","N/A","N/A","General","6.3  Where the normal means of access must be diverted or blocked off, alternative safe routes for wheelchair users and ambulant disabled persons will be identified, taking into account existing hazards and obstructions such as pavement kerbs and lamp-posts.","Access","Paragraph 6.3, Information Paper D10: Maintaining Access to Residential and Commercial Property during Construction. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A53","N/A","N/A","General","6.4  Where particular difficulties are identified, arrangements will be made on a case- by-case basis.\r\n","Access","Paragraph 6.4, Information Paper D10: Maintaining Access to Residential and Commercial Property during Construction. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A54","N/A","N/A","General","5.1  The nominated undertaker will require its contractors to apply, and to comply with, the requirements of the Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) and will ensure the use of best practicable means to reduce the effect of the borrow pits on the local environment.","Environmental Controls","Paragraph 5.1, Information Paper D12: Borrow Pits. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A55","N/A","N/A","General","5.6  For dust control the submission will have regard to the Institute of Air Quality Management mineral guidance. ","Environmental Controls","Paragraph 5.6, Information Paper D12: Borrow Pits. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
[null,"Series E Information Papers: Environment","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["A56","N/A","N/A","General","5.4 HS2 Ltd has carried out an early review to identify existing ancient woodlands along the line of route not already listed on the ancient woodland inventory (AWI). This review found that the Proposed Scheme will result in loss of approximately 9.8ha of ancient woodland across 11 sites, 2 of which were already on the AWI and 9 of which have been added to the AWI. To seek to compensate for the loss of ancient woodland the nominated undertaker will use best practice measures such as re-using the ancient woodland soils where practicable, enhancement of retained woodland and creating new mixed deciduous woodland. However, it is acknowledged that it is not possible to replace ancient woodland. Losses of habitats that are irreplaceable are reported in the ES as permanent adverse effects.","Protected sites","Paragraph 5.4, Information Paper E2: Ecology. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A215","N/A","N/A","General"," 5.5 HS2 Ltd recognises that ancient and veteran trees are an irreplaceable resource and their potential loss will result in a permanent adverse effect that is significant at district/borough level in each case. Where reasonably practicable, measures will be taken to protect and retain ancient and veteran trees within and adjacent to the proposed works area to reduce the number that will be impacted. Where loss is unavoidable, the trees will be soft felled and sections placed within retained habitats to provide a continued deadwood resource.\r\n\r\n","Protected sites","Paragraph 5.5, Information Paper E2: Ecology. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A57","N/A","N/A","General","7.1 The Highways Sub-Group of the HS2 Planning Forum, which includes representatives from all the local highways authorities affected by the Proposed Scheme, acts as a focus for consultation and liaison on highways and traffic issues that are route-wide. It will consider general construction traffic issues and the procedures for consultation and obtaining any necessary consents once construction commences.","Consultation","Paragraph 7.1, Information Paper E3: Management of Traffic During Construction. Version 1.2","2019-09-02","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A58","N/A","N/A","General","7.2  Liaison will continue on a more local basis prior to and during construction to discuss specific day-to-day issues around construction traffic management as they arise. This is likely to involve the nominated undertaker and/or contractor(s), highway authority officers responsible for traffic management, highway maintenance, street lighting, traffic signals, walking, cycling and public transport services (as well as utility company representatives when necessary).","Consultation","Paragraph 7.2, Information Paper E3: Management of Traffic During Construction. Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A59","N/A","N/A","General","7.3  During construction, regular local traffic liaison meetings will be arranged with highway authorities, bus operators, taxi and trade representation (as appropriate), and the police - other emergency services will be included, as appropriate. These meetings will provide an opportunity for contractors to present proposals for future works affecting the highway, including methods of construction and proposed programme, and for a review of the associated traffic management requirements. This will allow the highway authorities to carry out their network co-ordination duties.","Consultation","Paragraph 7.3, Information Paper E3: Management of Traffic During Construction. Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A60","N/A","N/A","General","7.4  Some traffic management proposals may require Traffic Regulation Orders under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1988 to cover measures such as the introduction of one-way streets, banned turns and temporary speed limits. These will be discussed at the liaison meetings. Applications for these orders will be made to the relevant traffic authority by contractors and advertised locally in the normal way.","Consultation","Paragraph 7.4, Information Paper E3: Management of Traffic During Construction. Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A61","N/A","N/A","General","7.5  The nominated undertaker, as part of the requisite community liaison arrangements, will require contractors to communicate regularly with parties affected by the works. Local residents and businesses will be informed - appropriately and in advance - of the dates and durations of any closures of roads or public right of way, and will be provided with details of diversion routes at least two weeks in advance or when final details are available. Advance warning signs of road closures will be provided for users of roads and public rights of way. ","Consultation","Paragraph 7.5, Information Paper E3: Management of Traffic During Construction. Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A62","N/A","N/A","General","4.2 In some places, road diversions or realignments may be required to connect with a new crossing over or under the railway. The nominated undertaker will adopt the shortest route that can reasonably be achieved, consistent with design and safety requirements. As well as aiming to minimise the impacts on vehicular traffic, the needs of non-motorised users (i.e. pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders) have also been considered when developing new road layouts.","Roads","Paragraph 4.2, Information Paper E5: Roads and Public Rights of Way. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A63","N/A","N/A","General","4.3  All alterations to major rural roads will be designed using the UK’s national standards given in the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) produced by Highways England.\r\n","Roads","Paragraph 4.3, Information Paper E5: Roads and Public Rights of Way. Version 1.1","2019-02-15","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A64","N/A","N/A","General","4.4  However, country lanes are very different to the main road network, and it is important to retain the existing character of these minor rural routes where reasonably practicable. Since most published standards do not cater adequately for this type of road, HS2 Ltd has developed a set of design criteria which is based on experience from the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (High Speed One) project and industry good practice. These will be applied where new, realigned or diverted routes are required, helping them to retain a similar ‘feel’ as other roads in the locality.","Roads","Paragraph 4.4, Information Paper E5: Roads and Public Rights of Way. Version 1.1","2019-02-15","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A65","N/A","N/A","General","4.5  In both urban and rural areas, local authority design standards will be used, where appropriate, together with national guidance including the Manual for Streets and Manual for Streets 2.","Roads","Paragraph 4.5, Information Paper E5: Roads and Public Rights of Way. Version 1.1","2019-02-15","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A66","N/A","N/A","General","5.2  Where a temporary or permanent realignment or diversion of a public right of way is unavoidable, the design objective has been to seek the shortest practicable route. In a few cases, users will be redirected using a reasonably convenient alternative route to a nearby public right of way – or road, if suitable for non-motorised users – prior to closure, with appropriate signage. Temporary arrangements required during construction will remain in place until the public right of way is either re-established or a permanent diversion or realignment is constructed. Public rights of way will also be re-established where ‘cut and cover’ tunnelling techniques are used.","Public Rights of Way","Paragraph 5.2, Information Paper E5: Roads and Public Rights of Way. Version 1.2\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A67","N/A","N/A","General","5.3  Where several neighbouring public rights of way are affected during construction, any temporary closures will be phased, where reasonably practicable, to help maintain public access.\r\n","Public Rights of Way","Paragraph 5.3, Information Paper E5: Roads and Public Rights of Way. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A68","N/A","N/A","General","5.4  As part of the detailed design process, after Royal Assent, we will work with highway authorities, local access forums, user groups (e.g. the Ramblers) and communities to identify the best way of maintaining public rights of way during construction. Design will also continue to be informed by guidance produced by organisations such as the British Horse Society.\r\n","Public Rights of Way","Paragraph 5.4, Information Paper E5: Roads and Public Rights of Way. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A69","N/A","N/A","General","6.1  Where public bus routes are affected by temporary road closures during construction, a diversionary route and (where necessary) temporary bus stops will be identified. In a few cases, there may be permanent changes to bus routes and the nominated undertaker will work with local authorities and transport operators to develop suitable alternative arrangements. ","Maintaining bus routes","Paragraph 6.1, Information Paper E5: Roads and Public Rights of Way. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A70","N/A","N/A","General","6.2  In the case of other bus services provided by local authorities under statutory and policy based obligations, such as home to school transport and adult social care services, these may also be subject to temporary diversion and to some delay. The nominated undertaker will engage closely with the local authorities on the management of impacts arising during construction in preparation of local traffic management plans and again in advance of works taking place in those locations. ","Maintaining bus routes","Paragraph 6.2, Information Paper E5: Roads and Public Rights of Way. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A71","N/A","N/A","General","7.1  During the construction phase, meeting the needs for cyclists and other vulnerable road users will be a key consideration when plans are prepared for road closures or other works in the highway that could disrupt existing routes.","Cycle Routes","Paragraph 7.1, Information Paper E5: Roads and Public Rights of Way. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A72","N/A","N/A","General","7.3 The design of cycling infrastructure will be informed by relevant advice and guidance published by the Department for Transport (DfT) and Highways England, including Local Transport Note (LTN) 1/20 ‘Cycle Infrastructure Design’. Due regard will also be given to the applicable aspects of other reference documents, including the Welsh Government's Active Travel Design Guidance in relation to rural roads, Transport for London's London Cycling Design Standards in relation to urban roads, and other relevant standards or guidance (or successor documents of similar scope) as appropriate.","Cycle Routes","Paragraph 7.3, Information Paper E5: Roads and Public Rights of Way. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A73","N/A","N/A","General","* Please see information paper for definitions*\r\n\r\n6.1  Where two accommodation accesses of a different standard (in terms of width, surfacing and boundary treatment) are combined, the higher standard will be adopted.\r\n","Accommodation access with shared use","Paragraph 6.1, Information Paper E6: Private Means of Access. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A74","N/A","N/A","General","6.2  Shared-use accommodation accesses will be provided with suitable gating arrangements to protect the interests of each party. These can include separate or shared gates, and any locking arrangements will be agreed as appropriate to the circumstances at each location. ","Accommodation access with shared use","Paragraph 6.2, Information Paper E6: Private Means of Access. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A75","N/A","N/A","General","6.3  In the case of accommodation bridges that are shared with public rights of way, extra width will be provided on one side to help keep vehicles and pedestrians separate.","Accommodation access with shared use","Paragraph 6.3, Information Paper E6: Private Means of Access. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A76","N/A","N/A","General","7.1  Accommodation underbridges carrying internal farm routes beneath the new railway will be sized in accordance with the expected usage requirements and these will vary from one location to another.\r\n","Farm Accommodation Bridges","Paragraph 7.1, Information Paper E6: Private Means of Access. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A77","N/A","N/A","General","7.5  Prior to the completion of the detailed design process, the nominated undertaker will be required to consult the owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be undertaken on any part of that holding. For more information on this, see the Phase 2a HS2 Guide for Farmers and Growers.","Farm Accommodation Bridges","Paragraph 7.5, Information Paper E6: Private Means of Access. Version 1.0","2017-07-17","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A78","N/A","N/A","General","8.5  Where appropriate, the nominated undertaker will then enter into individual maintenance agreements with highway authorities to clarify future maintenance responsibilities for the new or altered highway assets in each area. This can include the demarcation of adjacent highway and railway assets (e.g. earthworks, drainage and non-bridge structures).","Maintenance Agreements","Paragraph 8.5, Information Paper E7: Future Highway Maintenance Responsibilities. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A79","N/A","N/A","General","10.4 Any financial effects relating to the handover of new or altered highway assets to highway authorities will not be clear until the construction programme for the Proposed Scheme is confirmed following Royal Assent of the Bill. A full “new burdens” assessment will be undertaken prior to commencement of construction. In the event that this demonstrates that the Proposed Scheme is leading to a new burden on any highways authorities, these additional costs will be reimbursed.\r\n10.5 In the meantime, a preliminary analysis into the expected cost of highway maintenance will be undertaken by HS2 Ltd to inform discussions with highway authorities. \r\n","Highway Maintenance Costs","Paragraph 10.4, Information Paper E7: Future Highway Maintenance Responsibilities. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A80","N/A","N/A","General","12.1  The nominated undertaker will, at the request of the highway authority, use reasonable endeavours to negotiate a collateral warranty for the benefit of the highway authority from the date that it becomes responsible for the maintenance of the new or altered highway or, if it is possible to do so, will enforce any rights which it has under its contract for the benefit of the highway authority.","Warranties and guarantees","Paragraph 12.1, Information Paper E7: Future Highway Maintenance Responsibilities. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A81","N/A","N/A","General","13.1  In the event that a latent defect manifests itself in any HS2 highway works after the 12-month maintenance period and within the period during which a claim can be made for a fault in design, materials or workmanship, the nominated undertaker will – at the request of the highway authority – use reasonable endeavours to secure an appropriate remedy in accordance with the terms of the relevant design or construction contract. ","Latent Defects","Paragraph 13.1, Information Paper E7: Future Highway Maintenance Responsibilities. Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A82","N/A","N/A","General","3.1 For this paper, construction traffic means all vehicles over 3.5 tonnes which are making deliveries of construction equipment or materials, or moving quantities of excavated material on public roads. Controls on the routes to be used by construction traffic will apply to large goods vehicles over 7.5t, where there are more than 24 movements to and from a site each day. These lorry routes are approved by the relevant planning authority, normally being the same as the authority responsible for the road network where the site is located. Overall vehicle numbers (including workforce private vehicle trips) will be considered when assessing the environmental impact of the project in accordance with the Environmental Statement.\r\n3.2 HS2 Construction vehicles and their impact on road safety will be managed, monitored and controlled by: \r\n− a vehicle monitoring system, to enable contractors to provide forecast and actual movement data as well as information on safety compliance;\r\n- vehicle flow monitoring, where there are specific restrictions on numbers of vehicles permitted to use a route;\r\n- vehicle identification;\r\n-  driver training in vulnerable road user awareness, rural road driving and fuel efficiency;\r\n- requirements for vehicle safety equipment and blind spot minimisation; \r\n- the implementation of fleet operator quality schemes; and\r\n- the implementation of route and flow monitoring, including monitoring that the driver and vehicle safety requirements are being met.\r\n3.3 How these HS2 Construction vehicle management, monitoring and control measures will be applied will be set out in a route-wide Traffic Management Plan which will be consulted on with the highway authorities along the line of the Phase 2a route.\r\n","Background","Paragraphs 3.1 to 3.3, Information Paper E8: Vehicle Flow Management and Safety Requirements During Construction.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A83","N/A","N/A","General","4.1 For the main construction phase the nominated undertaker will implement a vehicle monitoring system which will:\r\n∙\tenable the nominated undertaker to manage and monitor the overall flow of construction vehicle movements and seek to avoid vehicles queuing on the highway;\r\n∙\tenable the nominated undertaker to monitor the overall volume of vehicles passing any specific location during particular hours where required to ensure compliance with an undertaking or assurance; and\r\n∙\tenable Principal Contractors to plan their scheduling of vehicle movements for each site in advance of arrival.\r\n4.2 Principal Contractors will be required to use the system to advise the nominated undertaker of future planned vehicle movements to ensure that site capacities are not exceeded and that movements are only planned for permitted working hours as described in Information Paper D5 Working Hours.\r\n4.3 Principal Contractors will enter into the system actual vehicle arrival times at construction sites and provide management information such as registration, vehicle type, operator, load type, utilisation, origin, driver details and vehicle safety equipment compliance.\r\n4.4 The system will enable the production of reports covering adherence to plans, actual movement details and safety compliance.\r\n4.5 The requirements and systems outlined above will also be used to ensure that Large Goods Vehicles (over 7.5t) only use approved routes. Technology such as automatic number plate recognition and GPS may be used to respond to complaints and verify compliance.\r\n","Vehicle flows and road safety management, monitoring and control","Paragraphs 4.1 to 4.5, Information Paper E8: Vehicle Flow Management and Safety Requirements During Construction.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A84","N/A","N/A","General","5.1. All vehicles over 3.5t regularly employed on construction will be required to display an A4 size identifier, stating ‘HS2’, inside the cab windscreen in a position that does not obscure the driver’s visibility. It should only be in use when the vehicle is on HS2 business.\r\n5.2. The purpose of the identifier is to allow emergency services, stakeholders and the public to identify HS2 vehicles if the vehicles are off permitted routes, parked inappropriately, badly driven or involved in a road traffic incident\r\n","Vehicle identification","Paragraphs 5.1 to 5.2, Information Paper E8: Vehicle Flow Management and Safety Requirements During Construction.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A85","N/A","N/A","General","6.1.Principal Contractors will need to ensure that their heavy goods vehicle fleets operate in accordance with an approved and audited fleet quality plan, such as the Fleet Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS ), DVSA’s Earn Recognition or ISO39001.\r\n6.2. Light van fleets can follow more appropriate quality plans, such as Van Excellence.\r\n","Fleet operator quality plans","Paragraphs 6.1 to 6.2, Information Paper E8: Vehicle Flow Management and Safety Requirements During Construction.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A86","N/A","N/A","General","7.1  The Construction Logistics and Community Safety (CLOCS) standard is a voluntary standard that has been developed to protect vulnerable road users. Principal Contractors, and their supply chain, will be required to follow appropriate CLOCS requirements.\r\n","Driver training and vehicle safety","Paragraph 7.1, Information Paper E8: Vehicle Flow Management and Safety Requirements During Construction.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A87","N/A","N/A","General","7.2  Drivers need to undertake periodic training, to maintain their Certificate of Professional Competency (CPC). Drivers of vehicles over 3.5t who regularly attend any HS2 worksites must complete CPC training in vulnerable road user awareness, rural driving and fuel efficiency driving within time limits which will be set by the nominated undertaker. Driver training records will be entered on a suitable database for regular review by contractors and compliance monitoring by the nominated undertaker. \r\n","Driver training","Paragraph 7.2, Information Paper E8: Vehicle Flow Management and Safety Requirements During Construction.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A88","N/A","N/A","General","7.3  Vehicles over 3.5t regularly attending any HS2 worksite, as well as complying with all legal regulations and standards, will be required to have the following safety equipment fitted and in full working order at the start of each working day:\r\n• prominent signage warning other road users not to get too close to the vehicle (this will also apply to certain construction vehicles less than 3.5t );\r\n• side under-run guards on both sides, unless the contractor has demonstrated that site conditions mean that they are not capable of being fitted; and\r\n• blind spot minimisation, which may be a combination of Class IV, V and VI mirrors, a camera system for blind spots, audible or visual front nearside driver alerts and audible nearside left turn and reversing external warnings. Fresnel lenses will not be considered adequate for blind spot minimisation.\r\n\r\n","Vehicle safety","Paragraph 7.3, Information Paper E8: Vehicle Flow Management and Safety Requirements During Construction.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A89","N/A","N/A","General","7.4  Vehicles over 7.5t used for the movement of mass spoil material must also have a four-way or 360 degree camera system fitted that can store up to two weeks’ data and which may be viewed by the principal contractor on a ‘just cause’ basis. \r\n","Vehicle safety","Paragraphs 7.4, Information Paper E8: Vehicle Flow Management and Safety Requirements During Construction.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A90","N/A","N/A","General","7.5. Vehicles failing to comply with the above requirements will not be allowed on HS2 worksites, and drivers would be subject to suspension from all HS2 worksites.\r\n7.6. Other vehicle safety standards will also apply and whilst failure to comply will result in vehicles being turned away from HS2 worksites, a driver suspension policy would not apply. The additional standards are that vehicles:\r\n• Must not have any tinted windows;\r\n• Must have clean standard registration plates;\r\n• Must have a working beacon fitted;\r\n• May only carry passengers for the number of seats fitted;\r\n• Must not carry alcohol;\r\n• Must carry appropriate emergency aids, such as a first aid kit;\r\n• May not carry children or pets; and\r\n• Must have winter tyres fitted where and when it is a contractor policy for works vehicles.\r\n","Vehicle safety","Paragraphs 7.5 to 7.6, Information Paper E8: Vehicle Flow Management and Safety Requirements During Construction.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A91","N/A","N/A","General","8.2  Monitoring of compliance will be led by a dedicated monitoring and compliance team employed by the nominated undertaker.\r\n","Monitoring of compliance","Paragraph 8.2, Information Paper E8: Vehicle Flow Management and Safety Requirements During Construction.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A92","N/A","N/A","General","8.3  The administrators of the vehicle monitoring system will review contractor performance and compliance with driver and vehicle safety, as well as ensuring that contractors comply with approved lorry routes and any relevant undertakings and assurances. \r\n","Monitoring of compliance","Paragraph 8.3, Information Paper E8: Vehicle Flow Management and Safety Requirements During Construction.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A93","N/A","N/A","General","8.4  In addition, the compliance team will ensure that the nominated undertaker’s policies and procedures are being adhered to.\r\n","Monitoring of compliance","Paragraph 8.4, Information Paper E8: Vehicle Flow Management and Safety Requirements During Construction.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A94","N/A","N/A","General","3.1  The nominated undertaker will take all reasonable steps to design and construct altered roads, and to design, construct, operate and maintain the operational railway so that the combined airborne noise from these sources, predicted in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances, does not exceed the lowest observed adverse effect levels set out in Table 1 of Appendix B.  [Please consult Information Paper E9 to view this table: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628455/E9_Control_of_Airborne_Noise_v1.0.pdf]\r\n","Airborne noise","Paragraph 3.1, Information Paper E9: Control of Airborne Noise.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A95","N/A","N/A","General","3.2  Where it is not reasonably practicable to achieve this objective, the nominated undertaker will reduce airborne noise from the altered roads and the operational railway as far as is reasonably practicable. \r\n","Reducing airborne noise","Paragraph 3.2, Information Paper E9: Control of Airborne Noise.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A96","N/A","N/A","General","3.3  Noise insulation will be offered with the aim that airborne noise from altered roads and the operational railway does not give rise to significant adverse effects on health and quality of life that would otherwise be expected when airborne noise exceeds the significant observed adverse effect levels set out in Table 1 of Appendix B. Eligibility for noise insulation is explained in Section 5. [Please consult Information Paper E9 to view this table: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628455/E9_Control_of_Airborne_Noise_v1.0.pdf]\r\n","Noise insulation","Paragraph 3.3, Information Paper E9: Control of Airborne Noise.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A97","N/A","N/A","General","3.4  Where possible, the nominated undertaker will also contribute to the improvement of health and quality of life through the control of airborne noise.\r\n","Health and quality of life","Paragraph 3.4, Information Paper E9: Control of Airborne Noise.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A98","N/A","N/A","General","3.5  Effects on health and quality of life are primarily avoided and minimised through the control of airborne noise at residential dwellings. It is recognised that effects can also occur when people are engaged in noise sensitive activities away from their home. To deliver the policy aims, reasonable steps will be taken to control airborne noise from altered roads and the operational railway to the levels set out in Table 2 of Appendix B for noise sensitive non-residential buildings and external amenity spaces. [Please consult Information Paper E9 to view this table: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628455/E9_Control_of_Airborne_Noise_v1.0.pdf]\r\n","Health and quality of life","Paragraph 3.5, Information Paper E9: Control of Airborne Noise.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A99","N/A","N/A","General","4.2  The following measures to control airborne noise from altered roads and the operational railway will be considered in the following order by the nominated undertaker:\r\n• reduce noise generation at source;\r\n• reduce noise propagation through the design, specification, construction and maintenance of noise fence barriers and/or landscape earthworks; and\r\n• reduce the amount of noise entering eligible properties through the offer of noise insulation.\r\n","Control Measures","Paragraph 4.2, Information Paper E9: Control of Airborne Noise.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A100","N/A","N/A","General","4.3  To ensure that the measures to control airborne noise are reasonable, the nominated undertaker will take account of the set of shared UK principles that underpin the Government’s sustainable development strategy.\r\n","Control Measures","Paragraph 4.3, Information Paper E9: Control of Airborne Noise.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A101","N/A","N/A","General","5.2  In addition, following the general time-window of eligibility described in the Noise Insulation Regulations (Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems) 1996, where airborne noise from the use of new or additional railways authorised by the Bill, altered roads authorised by the Bill or the combined airborne noise from both, is predicted outside a permanent dwelling in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances to exceed the significant observed adverse effect levels set out in Table 1 of Appendix B, the nominated undertaker will offer noise insulation.","Provision of noise insulation","Paragraph 5.2, Information Paper E9: Control of Airborne Noise.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A102","N/A","N/A","General","3.1  The nominated undertaker will design the temporary and permanent railways such that the level of ground-borne noise and vibration predicted in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances does not exceed the significant observed adverse effect levels given in Table 1 in Appendix B. (please consult Information Paper E10 for the Table - https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628456/E10_Ground-borne_noise_and_vibration_v1.0.pdf)\r\n","Ground-Bourne Noise and Vibration","Paragraph 3.1, Information Paper E10: Control of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration from the Operation of Temporary and Permanent Railways.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A103","N/A","N/A","General","3.2  The nominated undertaker will take all reasonably practicable steps to construct, operate and maintain the temporary and permanent railways so that the design objective stated in paragraph 3.1 is fulfilled.\r\n","Design objective","Paragraph 3.2, Information Paper E10: Control of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration from the Operation of Temporary and Permanent Railways.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A104","N/A","N/A","General","3.3  In addition, the nominated undertaker will take all reasonable steps to design, construct, operate and maintain the temporary and permanent railways such that, in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances, ground-borne noise and vibration does not exceed the lowest observed adverse effect levels given in Table 1 in Appendix B. (please consult Information Paper E10 for the Table - https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628456/E10_Ground-borne_noise_and_vibration_v1.0.pdf)\r\n","Levels of ground-bourne noise and vibration","Paragraph 3.3, Information Paper E10: Control of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration from the Operation of Temporary and Permanent Railways.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A105","N/A","N/A","General","3.4  The nominated undertaker will reduce ground-borne noise and vibration from the temporary and permanent railways as far as is reasonably practicable.\r\n","Reducing ground-bourne noise and vibration","Paragraph 3.4, Information Paper E10: Control of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration from the Operation of Temporary and Permanent Railways.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A106","N/A","N/A","General","3.6  The nominated undertaker will design the temporary and permanent railways such that the level of ground-borne noise and vibration predicted in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances does not exceed the impact levels given in Tables 2 and 3 in Appendix B. The nominated undertaker will take all reasonably practicable steps to construct, operate and maintain the temporary and permanent railways so that this design objective is fulfilled. (please consult Information Paper E10 for the Table - https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628456/E10_Ground-borne_noise_and_vibration_v1.0.pdf)\r\n","Designing in order to reduce ground-bourne noise and vibration","Paragraph 3.6, Information Paper E10: Control of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration from the Operation of Temporary and Permanent Railways.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A107","N/A","N/A","General","4.2  Ground-borne noise and vibration from the temporary and permanent railways will be controlled by the design and maintenance of the train and track.\r\n","Control Measures","Paragraph 4.2, Information Paper E10: Control of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration from the Operation of Temporary and Permanent Railways.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A108","N/A","N/A","General","4.3  To control ground-borne noise and vibration from the temporary and permanent railways, the nominated undertaker will be required to do the following in relation to the track systems:\r\n• at design stage, predict, through the use of appropriate modelling, the engineering requirements of the track system that will fulfil the objectives; \r\n• design a standard track form with the objective of meeting as many of those engineering requirements identified in the previous bullet as can reasonably be achieved by such a standard track system; \r\n• design an enhanced track form for locations where it is predicted that the standard track system will not meet the engineering requirements or to discharge other project commitments and undertakings;\r\n• translate the engineering requirements into contract specifications for the track systems; and\r\n• procure, install and maintain the track systems to meet the contract specifications established above. \r\n","Control Measures","Paragraph 4.3, Information Paper E10: Control of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration from the Operation of Temporary and Permanent Railways.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A109","N/A","N/A","General","4.4  To ensure that the measures to control ground-borne noise and vibration are reasonable, the nominated undertaker will take account of the set of shared UK principles that underpin the Government’s sustainable development strategy.\r\n","Control Measures","Paragraph 4.4, Information Paper E10: Control of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration from the Operation of Temporary and Permanent Railways.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A110","N/A","N/A","General","3.1 The nominated undertaker will design, construct, operate and maintain the stationary systems so that the rating level of the fixed installations in normal operation at the worst affected residential receptor, minus the background level, is not more than -5 dB, determined in accordance with BS4142:2014.\r\n\r\n3.2 Where it is not reasonably practicable to achieve this objective, the nominated undertaker will develop and adopt robust procedures to ensure that sound from all stationary systems is reduced as far as is reasonably practicable. \r\n\r\n3.3 In such cases, the nominated undertaker will design, construct, operate and maintain the stationary systems so that, under all reasonably foreseeable circumstances, the rating level of the stationary systems in normal operation at the worst affected residential receptor, minus the existing background level, is not more than +5 dB, determined in accordance with BS4142:2014.\r\n","Decibel levels","Paragraphs 3.1 to 3.3, Information Paper E11: Control of Noise from the Operation of Stationary Systems. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A111","N/A","N/A","General","3.5  Special consideration will be given to the assessment of sound from stationary systems when the background level is low, namely where the background levels are less than 30 dB.\r\n","Decibel levels","Paragraph 3.5, Information Paper E11: Control of Noise from the Operation of Stationary Systems.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A112","N/A","N/A","General","3.6  For non‐residential receptors, the methodology set out in BS4142:2014 is not relevant and does not apply. However, the nominated undertaker will control sound from stationary systems at noise-sensitive non‐residential receptors to avoid significant observed adverse effects on that receptor. \r\n","Control Measures","Paragraph 3.6, Information Paper E11: Control of Noise from the Operation of Stationary Systems.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A113","N/A","N/A","General","4.3  The surveys used to define the background levels will need to be carried out at the time of the detailed design. This will ensure that the background level will be established using up‐to‐date and robust information. The nominated undertaker will undertake the following steps to control noise from the stationary systems:\r\n• specify noise limits and incorporate acoustic requirements into contract documents such that they will apply to the design of all the stationary systems that are to be installed and operated as part of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n• determine the relevant background levels and establish these jointly with the relevant local authorities;\r\n• procure, install and commission stationary systems, including sound attenuation equipment that meets the specification requirements;\r\n• where it is not possible to achieve the lower design objective (noise rating to be 5dB below the background level), provide details to the relevant local authority (whose comments will be taken into consideration) of the steps to be taken to ensure that, under all reasonably foreseeable circumstances, the design and procurement processes for stationary systems are adequate to achieve compliance with the design criteria; and\r\n• before formal operation of the stationary system, complete a standard suite of acceptance tests as necessary to demonstrate that the operational sound levels achieve the design criteria.\r\n","Control Measures","Paragraph 4.3, Information Paper E11: Control of Noise from the Operation of Stationary Systems.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A114","N/A","N/A","General","3.1  Noise and vibration monitoring will be carried out at different times during the lifetime of the Proposed Scheme at a combination of carefully selected monitoring locations including: adjacent or attached to moving vehicles, at fixed positions or in the vicinity of individual assets; and at locations within the surrounding areas and communities alongside the railway corridor.\r\n","Operational Noise and Vibration Monitoring ","Paragraph 3.1, Information Paper E12: Operational Noise and Vibration Monitoring Framework.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A115","N/A","N/A","General","3.2 A wide range of noise and vibration related data for assets such as trains, tracks, noise fence barriers, earthworks, fixed installations and for how track and overhead catenary systems interact with the rolling stock will be collected. These data, together with noise and vibration measurements will be used to monitor the operational noise and vibration performance of the Proposed Scheme. \r\n\r\n3.3 Where noise and vibration performance deviates from expected conditions , the following actions will be undertaken:\r\na) If the measured performance  is better than the expected conditions:\r\n• A study to document the reasons why assets are achieving higher performance than expected\r\n• A review of further improvements to other assets that could potentially benefit from the technology transfer of the high performing assets\r\nb) If the measured performance is worse than the expected conditions:\r\n• A study to identify the root cause and all possible solutions to the low performance\r\n• An investigation of other similar assets that could also be underperforming \r\n• Corrective action to improve existing performance and prevent future loss of performance so far as this may be required to achieve the objectives set out in the Information Papers E9, E10 and E11\r\n\r\n3.4 The expected conditions will be determined with reference to: \r\n• predictions during the project’s development;\r\n• related noise and vibration data of the Proposed Scheme’s assets; \r\n• baseline noise and vibration monitoring information gathered prior to construction of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n• laboratory test information; and \r\n• previous in situ noise and vibration measurements.\r\n\r\n3.5 The expected noise and vibration performance of the Proposed Scheme, operational noise and vibration measurement data, associated asset information, description of corrective actions, results of measured performance compared to expected conditions, and monitoring reports will be shared with the relevant Local Authorities at appropriate intervals. \r\n","Operational Noise and Vibration Monitoring ","Paragraphs 3.2 to 3.5, Information Paper E12: Operational Noise and Vibration Monitoring Framework.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A116","N/A","N/A","General","3.1 The nominated undertaker will take all reasonable steps to design and construct the Proposed Scheme so that noise and vibration from construction does not exceed the lowest observed adverse effect levels set out in Tables 1 and 3 of Appendix A. (please consult Information Paper E13 for the Table - https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628459/E13_Control_of_construction_noise_and_vibration_v1.0.pdf)\r\n\r\n3.2 Where it is not reasonably practicable to achieve this objective, the nominated undertaker will reduce noise and vibration from the construction of the Proposed Scheme as far as is reasonably practicable.\r\n\r\n","Noise and vibration levels","Paragraph 3.1, Information Paper E13: Control of Construction Noise and Vibration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A117","N/A","N/A","General","3.3  Where noise or vibration from the construction of the Proposed Scheme exceed the significant observed adverse effect levels set out in Tables 1 and 3 of Appendix A, noise insulation or temporary re-housing will be offered with the aim that noise and vibration from the construction of the Proposed Scheme does not give rise to significant adverse effects on health and quality of life. Eligibility for noise insulation and temporary re-housing is explained in Appendix B.\r\n\r\n(please consult Information Paper E13 for the Table - https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628459/E13_Control_of_construction_noise_and_vibration_v1.0.pdf)\r\n","Noise insulation and temporary re-housing","Paragraph 3.3, Information Paper E13: Control of Construction Noise and Vibration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A118","N/A","N/A","General","3.4  Effects on health and quality of life are primarily avoided and minimised through the control of noise and vibration at residential dwellings. It is recognised that effects can also occur when people are engaged in noise sensitive activities away from their home. As a result, reasonable steps will also be taken to control noise and vibration from the construction of the Proposed Scheme to the levels set out in Tables 2 and 4 of Appendix A for noise sensitive non-residential buildings and external amenity spaces (see Glossary).\r\n\r\n(please consult Information Paper E13 for the Table - https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628459/E13_Control_of_construction_noise_and_vibration_v1.0.pdf)\r\n","Health and Quality of life","Paragraph 3.4, Information Paper E13: Control of Construction Noise and Vibration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A176","N/A","N/A","General","1. Noise insulation and temporary re-housing arrangements apply to dwellings and other buildings lawfully used for residential purposes .\r\n\r\n2.To be eligible you must own or occupy a residential dwelling and the dwelling must be one in which the predicted or actual noise exceeds any of the relevant thresholds in Table 5 for:\r\n\r\n- a period of 10 or more days of working in any 15 consecutive days during construction; or\r\n- for a total of 40 days or more in any 6 consecutive months during\r\nconstruction.\r\n\r\n3. The scheme applies to all rooms, with a qualifying door or window, which are not solely used as a kitchen, utility room, bathroom, cellar or sanitary accommodation. On your behalf the nominated undertaker will prepare the predictions and monitor the actual construction noise levels in consultation with the relevant local authority.\r\n","Buildings and occupiers eligibility ","Appendix B, Paragraphs 1 to 3, Information Paper E13: Control of Construction Noise and Vibration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A119","N/A","N/A","General","5. Some buildings and/or their occupants may not be adequately protected by the thresholds in Table 5. Specific noise trigger levels and/or alternative noise control measures will be considered on a case by case basis for situations such as: residential homes where noise insulation does not represent a viable option including houseboats or mobile homes, night workers, those who regularly work from home needing a quiet environment to work in and those that have a medical condition which will be seriously aggravated by construction noise.\r\n\r\n6. Residential buildings exposed to levels of ground-borne noise or vibration that are predicted or measured to exceed the significant observed adverse effect levels set out in Table 3 of Appendix A, for two or more consecutive days or nights, will also be considered on a case by case basis.\r\n\r\n7. Where appropriate, the nominated undertaker will liaise with the local authority to determine appropriate noise insulation and temporary rehousing thresholds for residential special cases, where these are not explicitly set out above.\r\n\r\n(please consult Information Paper E13 for the Table - https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628459/E13_Control_of_construction_noise_and_vibration_v1.0.pdf)\r\n","Residential Special Cases","Appendix B, Paragraphs 5 to 7, Information Paper E13: Control of Construction Noise and Vibration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A120","N/A","N/A","General","8.  Whilst the discretionary arrangements described above only apply to residential properties, buildings which may be particularly sensitive to noise (including, commercial, educational and community) will be subject to individual consideration by the nominated undertaker on the application of anybody or person responsible for, or holding a legal interest or estate in, any such building.\r\n","Non-residential Special Cases","Appendix B, Paragraph 8, Information Paper E13: Control of Construction Noise and Vibration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A121","N/A","N/A","General","9.The [noise insulation] package will consist of: \r\n•secondary glazing for living room and bedroom windows on eligible facades, plus supplementary ventilation if required ;\r\n•blinds on facades where there is a need to control solar gain;\r\n•insulation treatment for external doors on eligible facades.\r\n\r\n10. Depending on the type of window you already have, secondary glazing will usually comprise another pane of glass in its own frame (wood, metal or plastic) 100-200 mm inside the existing window. This can be opened for cleaning or ventilation. Secondary glazing is different to double glazing. Double glazing consists of two panes of glass in the same casing, typically around 20mm apart which replace the existing window. If your property already has double glazing, this will not affect your eligibility under this policy. Following a survey of your property, you will be advised as to the effectiveness of any currently installed double glazing in terms of attenuation of external noise, compared to the offer of secondary glazing. However, you are not obliged to accept the offer of insulation if you do not think you need it. You may, at your own discretion, and accepting the reduce level of noise attenuation, choose only to have ventilation units and blinds installed. \r\n\r\n11. Windows work best to control noise when closed – so alternative ventilation, provided by means such as a small electric ventilator fan located in an outside wall,  is usually required to enable windows to be kept closed when the noise is at its highest. \r\n\r\n12. On some facades, solar gain on sunny days can make rooms too hot to keep windows closed. Subject to the agreement of the claimant, blinds will be fitted between the main window and the secondary glazing to minimise this effect. If the claimant chooses not to accept blinds as part of the noise insulation package the possible impacts of this will be explained to them. Blinds will not be retrofitted post installation of the noise insulation package should the claimant change their mind at a later date.\r\n\r\n13. The nominated undertaker may be able to install a “secondary” door to improve noise insulation. If the design of your house prevents this, other methods may be used.\r\n\r\n14. There may be circumstances in which it is not possible to fit secondary glazing or alternative ventilation. Such cases will be considered on a case by case basis. Where eligibility is confirmed, appropriate alternative mitigation measures will be considered - e.g. local screening. Alternatively, temporary re-housing may be offered even if the Temporary Re-housing thresholds are not exceeded.\r\n","Noise insulation package details","Appendix B, Paragraphs 9 to 14, Information Paper E13: Control of Construction Noise and Vibration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A122","N/A","N/A","General","15. The nominated undertaker will offer to arrange your temporary re-housing package, which will include the following:\r\n• Temporary alternative accommodation.\r\n• Removals.\r\n• Storage and insurance of your personal effects.\r\n• Insurance for the house you vacate\r\n• Where appropriate your pets to go into kennels, catteries etc.\r\n• Where appropriate the disconnection and later reconnection of gas, water, electricity etc.\r\n\r\n16. Alternatively, you can choose to make these arrangements yourself. In such circumstances, you will be supplied with information and guidance on all the matters listed above, to enable you to make the arrangements yourself; and you will be offered help you ensure  that  the  costs  you  incur  can  be  agreed  and  paid  to  you  as  soon  as practicable.\r\n\r\n17. Irrespective of how your temporary re-housing arrangements are made, the nominated undertaker will bear (or reimburse you with) the reasonable costs associated with your temporary re-housing. The nominated undertaker will also bear any increased costs of maintaining or insuring your own home resulting from your temporary relocation. These include any additional council tax liability which is due on your own home whilst it is unoccupied.\r\n\r\n18. If you have pre-existing obligations to maintain your property on a regular basis under the terms of your lease or as a result of statutory requirements, the nominated undertaker will ensure that you have suitable access to your own property, where reasonably practicable, to enable you to fulfil such obligations whilst you are away. \r\n","Temporary re-housing package details","Appendix B, Paragraphs 15 to 18 , Information Paper E13: Control of Construction Noise and Vibration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A123","N/A","N/A","General","20. If you are a tenant and are offered temporary re-housing during the construction works, you will still be responsible for the rent, bills and other outgoings at your current home and you will still be a tenant there. The offer of temporary re-housing will include the additional cost of the relocation accommodation. You are free to visit and use your current home as you wish during the relocation, subject to the terms of your existing tenancy. If your tenancy agreement expires during the relocation you should (if you want to) renew it with your landlord in the normal way. If you choose not to renew your tenancy, grant to meet the cost of the alternative accommodation will cease when your tenancy expires.\r\n\r\n21. If you are a landlord, your tenant will remain your tenant and remain liable to pay rent in accordance with your agreement with them. \r\n\r\n22. The type of re-housing offered will depend on the duration of the relocation. For short durations hotel accommodation may be appropriate. For longer periods, alternative rented accommodation would be more suitable. In all cases account will be taken of your existing accommodation as far as possible.\r\n\r\n23. The accommodation offered will be governed by what is available at the time and your reasonable requirements. Some people may be prepared to move to another area on a temporary basis if they would be nearer friends, family or work. Others may need to stay in the same area.\r\n\r\n24. You may be eligible to receive both noise insulation and temporary re-housing, but this will depend on the circumstances. The noise generated by the works will vary over the course of the job. In some areas, the noise may qualify for temporary re-housing for one period, and noise insulation only for a different period. In these circumstances you would receive a temporary re-housing offer for one period and a noise insulation offer for the other period. In other areas, a home may qualify for temporary re-housing for a given period, but outside that period the noise may not trigger a separate noise insulation offer. In such a case, a temporary re-housing offer only would be made and noise insulation would not be offered.\r\n\r\n25. However, if you qualify for temporary re-housing but not noise insulation, you do not have to accept the offer of re-housing and may request noise insulation instead. You will be made aware of any shortfall in sound insulation performance of the noise insulation in relation to the thresholds presented in Table 5 and that the degree of disturbance could be high even with the noise insulation in place. The nominated undertaker will take account of the performance of the noise insulation package when considering any later request you make for temporary re-housing under this scheme.\r\n","Temporary re-housing package details","Appendix B, Paragraphs 20 to 25, Information Paper E13: Control of Construction Noise and Vibration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A124","N/A","N/A","General","26. Initially eligibility for the scheme depends on the predicted noise level following the assessment that will be carried out for that purpose once detailed construction plans are in place. \r\n\r\n27. If those noise predictions indicate that a property is eligible, the offer of noise insulation or grant for noise insulation will be made and, if accepted and all necessary approvals obtained, the insulation will be installed before the works commence. However, the actual noise may turn out to be more or less than the prediction and therefore the noise levels will be monitored at locations in consultation with the relevant local authority as work progresses. If it is found that noise levels are not as high as expected, the insulation package will not be removed. If it is found that the noise levels are higher than expected and meet the thresholds for temporary rehousing, you will be informed and the provisions under this policy will apply.\r\n\r\n28. If those noise predictions indicate that a property is eligible, the offer of temporary re-housing will be made and, if accepted, arrangements for temporary alternative accommodation and associated services made. However, the actual noise may turn out to be more or less than the prediction and therefore the noise levels will be monitored as work progresses. If it is found that noise levels are not as high as expected, your temporary re-housing arrangements will still continue.\r\n","Procedure for identifying qualifying properties and implementing noise insulation and temporary re-housing measures","Appendix B, Paragraphs 26 to 28, Information Paper E13: Control of Construction Noise and Vibration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A177","N/A","N/A","General","5.8. HS2 Ltd has set route wide emission requirements and targets for the engines of contractor heavy goods vehicles, vans and cars used during the construction of the Proposed Scheme. Requirements and targets have also been set for the use of Ultra Low Emission Vehicles. Appendix A [of Information Paper E14] sets out these route wide emission requirements and targets. Appendix A also shows for information the emission requirements and targets for vehicles used within any clean air zones that may be designated by local authorities on the route of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Vehicle emissions","Paragraph 5.8, Information Paper E14: Air Quality. Version 1.3\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A178","N/A","N/A","General","5.9. Certain exemptions to these [see Appendix A of Information Paper E14] construction vehicle emission standards are permitted for specialist vehicles, unforeseen circumstances and triviality. These, and the obligations for the construction vehicle emission standards, are set out in Appendix B [of Information Paper E14] which contains a copy of the ‘Euro VI’ Assurance issued to the London Borough of Camden on 14 September 2016 in relation to the construction of Phase One of HS2. The assurance at Appendix B applies to the Proposed Scheme, in so far as it controls the construction vehicle emission standards. References in the assurance to the London Borough of Camden should be read as references to the relevant local authorities on the route of the Proposed Scheme. The terms of this assurance apply to each local authority area along the route of the Proposed Scheme. The nominated undertaker shall comply with the commitments in this assurance within each local authority area along the route of the Proposed Scheme in so far as those commitments are relevant to the emission requirements and the targets set out in Appendix A.\r\n","Vehicle emissions","Paragraph 5.9 information Paper E14: Air Quality. Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide\t","Routewide"]
["A125","N/A","N/A","General","\r\nExplanation and Interpretation of the Assurance \r\n\r\nReferences in the Assurance to the London Borough of Camden should be read as references to the relevant local authorities on the route of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nThe standards set out in the Assurance apply following a 12 month transition period, which is from 14 September 2017.\r\n\r\n“Action Plan” (as referred to in paragraph 3.9.5 of the Assurance) means a plan describing measures to be implemented by the relevant contractor in order to reach compliance with the Euro VI Engines Assurance as soon as is practicable. This Plan will be agreed with the nominated undertaker and reviewed alongside monthly reporting data set out in paragraphs 3.9.2 and 3.9.4 of the Assurance;\r\n“principal contractor” has the same meaning as “lead contractor” as defined in the draft Code of Construction Practice submitted as part of the Environmental Statement; \r\n“relevant contractor and sub-contractor” means the contractor and sub-contractor of the nominated undertaker; and\r\n“start of works” means the start of works authorised under the Bill.\r\n\r\nThe Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to include in their contracts with all relevant contractors the following requirements and to enforce those requirements and to require those relevant contractors to pass down and enforce these requirements in contracts with any relevant sub-contractors:\r\n\r\nHeavy vehicles (>3.5 tonnes)\r\n3.9.1 Require contractors to use HGVs (vehicles with a permissible maximum weight greater than 3.5 tonnes) within the London Low Emission Zone and relating to the construction of the HS2 works, to be powered by Euro VI (or lower emission) engines, unless it is an exempt vehicle.\r\n\r\n3.9.2 Require contractors to determine which vehicles are exempt and to report to the Nominated Undertaker HGV numbers by Vehicle Registration Number and Euro standard (including their subcontractors) including any exemptions and non-compliances for all relevant HS2 related works within the London Low Emission Zone. The exemptions shall be determined in a way that seeks to maximise the use of Euro VI (or lower emission) vehicles. This information to be forwarded to the London Borough of Camden, within one month of receipt by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n\r\n3.9.3 Certain HGVs (vehicles with a permissible maximum weight greater than 3.5 tonnes) may be exempted on the grounds of: \r\na) Specialism: being a specialist vehicle (not readily available as Euro VI compliant); and/or\r\nb) Unforeseen circumstances: for example breakdowns or mechanical failure requiring a replacement vehicle that is not readily available as Euro VI compliant; and/or\r\nc) Triviality: if it is expected that a particular vehicle is planned to and only makes no more than 12 visits in any 12-month rolling period to all HS2 works in the London Low Emission Zone, then the vehicle may be given a specific exemption.\r\nAll exemptions must be obtained from the contractor designated by the Nominated Undertaker for that purpose and the reasons for seeking the exemption shall be recorded. The totality of the exemptions listed in this clause shall account for no more than 8% of unique vehicles on an annual basis. There may be certain circumstances where an exemption cannot be granted in advance and in this case, a retrospective exemption can be granted provided that:\r\n(a) the relevant documentation is submitted for consideration within two working days of the vehicle arriving at site;\r\n(b) the vehicle falls within the grounds for an exemption; and\r\n(c) the reasons for the retrospective application are recorded.\r\n3.9.4 All principal contractors, shall set out in their Logistics Environment Sustainability and Safety Management Plans (ESSMPs), their exemptions management process and report vehicle numbers, exemptions and non-compliances to the Nominated Undertaker on a monthly basis for two years from start of works to be undertaken by those principal contractors. Following the end of the initial two year period the reporting period will be reduced in frequency by agreement as performance is established. Non-compliances are those HGVs (vehicles with a permissible maximum weight greater than 3.5 tonnes) which are not Euro VI compliant and have not been exempted under the agreed grounds for exemption (i.e. exempted vehicles are not considered to be non-compliances with the commitment). There shall be a transition period of 12 months from the signing of the assurance, during which the compliance regime will be established. Where Enabling Works Contractors do not produce ESSMPs, they shall make equivalent provisions to those set out in this paragraph, and agree them with the Nominated Undertaker. Such plans or provisions shall be consistent with the principle of avoiding pollutant emissions to air as far as reasonably practicable, as set out in Information Paper E31: Air Quality.3.3. The LB Camden will be provided with this information in accordance with the third assurance given by the Promoter in the Route-Wide Air Quality assurance dated 23 February 2016.\r\n\r\n3.9.5 For HGVs, contractors shall prepare and agree an Action Plan with the Nominated Undertaker:\r\na) if there is less than 100% Euro VI compliance; \r\nor\r\nb) if the number of exemptions increases on the previous three months.\r\n\r\nLight vehicles (vehicles less than tonnes)\r\n\r\n3.9.6 Require all light vehicles used by contractors in relation to the construction of the HS2 works in the London Low Emission Zone (vehicles with a permissible maximum weight less than or equal to 3.5 tonnes) to be Euro 4 petrol and Euro 6 diesel compliant by 2020, (without an exemptions regime, with annual reporting).\r\n\r\n3.9.7 Require contractors, as part of their Logistics Environment Sustainability and Safety Management Plans (ESSMPs), to produce a plan to work towards achieving target percentages of ULEVs to be used in the fleet of light vehicles relating to the construction of HS2 for the purposes of their contract, entering the London Low Emission Zone. An ʽUltra Low Emission Vehicle’ (ULEV) is defined here based on advice from the Office for Low Emission Vehicles as: ‘emissions lower than 75gCO2/km and zero-emission range greater than 10 miles’. The target percentage of ULEVs shall be proportionate to the size and duration of the contract, and take into account the vehicle activity included in it. This plan should be agreed with the Nominated Undertaker and progress against the plan shall be measured and reported.\r\n\r\n3.9.8 The use of cars (for the purposes of construction activities) by contractors is expected to be minimal during HS2 construction in inner urban areas within London. Contractors shall aim to adopt ULEV cars from the start of works under the act (and report actual usage measured as annual vehicle mileage, not unique vehicles), working towards a target of 100% ULEV use (or other percentage agreed with the Nominated Undertaker who shall have regard to what is proportionate given the size and duration of the contract) over the course of their contract, taking into account the contract size, duration and vehicle activity. For vans, contractors shall aim towards meeting a target of 75% ULEV use (or other percentage agreed with the Nominated Undertaker), measured as annual vehicle mileage). Benchmarks (defined here as numbers against which performance will be evaluated) are set for contractor fleet average CO2 emissions as follows (and will be subject to review): \r\na) fleet average for cars of 75gCO2/km from start of works authorised under the Bill, decreasing by 5gCO2/km every 3 years; and\r\nb) fleet average for vans of 160gCO2/km from start of works authorised under the Bill, decreasing by 20gCO2/km every 3 years).\r\n\r\nAdditional Notes on Compliance monitoring and reporting\r\n\r\n3.9.9 For the metrics for all vehicles referred to above, contractors shall be required to establish a baseline of vehicle use, exemptions and compliance percentages within the first two months of starting their activities.\r\n\r\n3.9.10 Data shall be reported to the Nominated Undertaker initially on a monthly basis; once continuous improvement is shown in each of three separate adjacent months, the frequency of reporting may be reduced (with the agreement of the Nominated Undertaker). Contractors shall also provide annual (calendar year) statistics to the Nominated Undertaker to enable aggregate reports to be compiled.\r\n\r\n3.9.11 In keeping with HS2’s principle of avoiding pollutant emissions to air as far as reasonably practicable, keep under review the potential for further updating this assurance to respond to potential future changes to vehicle emissions standards, technology and/or legislation. This could include, but is not restricted to, updating requirements to reflect future vehicle emission standards, and the introduction of automatic monitoring of vehicles relating to the construction of HS2 works. \r\n\r\n\r\nNOTE:- The LB Camden third route-wide air quality Assurance dated 23 February 2016, as referred to in paragraph 3.9.4 of the Assurances, provides that: The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to provide Local Authorities, where significant air quality effects are being managed by HS2, with information on an annual basis, which will include, as a minimum, breakdown of the number of vehicles accessing site, vehicle types, and monitoring data on road traffic in order to establish whether EU limits have been breached\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Euro VI Engines","Appendix B, Part 2, Paragraph 3.9, Information Paper E14: Air Quality. Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A126","N/A","N/A","General","4.1 Impacts of the Proposed Scheme on groundwater flows, levels and quality, have been analysed. Where the assessment predicts that a likely significant adverse effect may occur, a strategy to manage the risk will be agreed with the Environment Agency. Potential significant adverse effects on groundwater due to construction (such as excavations to form cuttings or tunnels ) will be mitigated locally wherever reasonably practicable. The tunnels will be designed so that the ingress of groundwater is not significant. The assessment has demonstrated that the passage of groundwater past the tunnels is not significantly reduced as part of the Proposed Scheme. The drainage within the Proposed Scheme will be designed, where reasonably practicable, to encourage the recharge of groundwater bodies.\r\n\r\n","Groundwater","Paragraph 4.1, Information Paper E15: Water Resources Flood Risk and Authorisation of Related Works. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A127","N/A","N/A","General","5.1  Where the railway and associated works have the potential to increase flood risk, the design reflects the approach required by the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and the supporting Technical Guidance (such as the incorporation of flood risk mitigation measures). The design aim of the Proposed Scheme is for no increase in the risk of flooding for vulnerable receptors including residential property (defined as more/highly vulnerable and essential infrastructure in Table 2 of the NPPF) during the lifetime of the Proposed Scheme , including an additional allowance for climate change. If required, the design will mitigate loss of floodplain by creating replacement storage areas with the capacity for a 1 in 100 year event (1% probability, including an allowance for climate change).\r\n","Flood risk","Paragraph 5.1, Information Paper E15: Water Resources Flood Risk and Authorisation of Related Works. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A179","N/A","N/A\t","General","6.1 Water resources and flood risk monitoring will be undertaken in consultation with the Environment Agency and other key stakeholders such as water companies [JA1] prior to and during construction, and if required post construction, to establish baseline conditions for surface water and groundwater and to confirm the effectiveness of temporary and permanent mitigation measures together with any remedial works deemed necessary.\r\n","Water resources and flood risk monitoring","Paragraph 6.1, Information Paper E15: Water Resources Flood Risk and Authorisation of Related Works. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A128","N/A","N/A","General","8.1 Engagement has been, and will continue to be, undertaken with the Environment Agency, Natural England, Lead Local Flood Authorities, the Canal & River Trust and water companies, to ensure that likely residual significant adverse effects are managed and mitigated appropriately.\r\n","Engagement","Paragraph 8.1, Information Paper E15: Water Resources Flood Risk and Authorisation of Related Works. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A129","N/A","N/A","General","4.5 If alternative land drainage arrangements are feasible, these will be discussed with the landowner if they express an interest in reassessing the arrangements provided for in the Bill and shown on the ES drawings.\r\n\r\n4.6 This will be done by the nominated undertaker in accordance with the following terms:\r\n\r\n- The nominated undertaker will identify with the landowner existing drainage arrangements on their land holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n\r\n- The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the nominated undertaker.\r\n\r\n- The nominated undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the landowner in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n\r\n- Prior to the commencement of significant works to construct the Proposed Scheme, land drains affected by the works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the landowner, which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n\r\n- As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the landowner as appropriate by the nominated undertaker.\r\n\r\n- Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the works to construct the Proposed Scheme, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the landowner.\r\n","Potential refinements during detailed design and construction","Paragraphs 4.5 to 4.6, Information Paper E16: Land Drainage.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A130","N/A","N/A","General","5.2  Once returned, such land drainage arrangements will become the sole responsibility of the landowner. Maintenance requirements will generally be consistent with normal farming practice, with any operations capable of being carried out by hand or using standard agricultural machinery. However, where appropriate, indicative maintenance plans will be provided by the nominated undertaker to landowners for guidance purposes.\r\n","Operation and maintenance","Paragraph 5.2, Information Paper E16: Land Drainage.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A131","N/A","N/A","General","5.3  For the excavated material which cannot be reused for the earthworks of the proposed scheme, the nominated undertaker will seek timely opportunities for alternative beneficial reuse such as in other local construction projects or the restoration of mineral sites, provided that the transportation of that material does not result in significant environmental effects.\r\n","Prevention through the design approach and mitigation","Paragraph 5.3, Information Paper E17: Excavated Material and Waste Management.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A132","N/A","N/A","General","\r\n6.1 Excavated material will be moved along the construction corridor of the Proposed Scheme where this is reasonably practicable. For longer distances or when it is not reasonably practicable to use the construction corridor, excavated material will be transported by public highway along designated construction routes. Where reasonably practicable, rail has been considered for the transportation of large quantities of excavated material over long distances.\r\n","Transportation of excavated materials","Paragraph 6.1, Information Paper E17: Excavated Material and Waste Management.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A133","N/A","N/A","General","6.1  In order to promote waste minimisation the nominated undertaker will develop a Site Waste Management Plan that will be used to identify materials and resources that can be recycled, recovered or re-used ahead of disposal to landfill. In addition, the plan will identify the specific types and quantities of waste likely to arise during the construction process. Where generated, waste will be classified in accordance with the statutory controls governing the management of inert, non-hazardous and hazardous wastes.\r\n","Materials and Resource Management","Paragraph 6.1, Information Paper E18: Land Quality (Contamination).  Version 1.1.","2019-09-02","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A134","N/A","N/A","General","3.1  The sustainable reuse of soils displaced by the Proposed Scheme is a key mitigation measure. Conserved soils will be used for the restoration of land to agriculture, forestry, landscape planting and ecological habitat creation, as set out in the ES and the draft Code of Construction Practice (CoCP).\r\n","Principles of Soil Handling","Paragraph 3.1, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A135","N/A","N/A","General","3.2 Where agricultural uses are to be resumed on land disturbed during the construction of the Proposed Scheme, the design objective is to restore land to its previous Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) grading. Restoration would seek to avoid any reduction in long term capability, which would downgrade the quality of the disturbed land, through the adoption of good practice techniques in handling, storing and reinstating soils on that land. This is subject to any alternative arrangements agreed with the owner of the land. The same general principles of soil handling will be applied to the reinstatement of land for forestry, landscape planting, ecological habitat creation and translocation.\r\n\r\n","Principles of Soil Handling","Paragraph 3.2, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A136","N/A","N/A","General","3.3 Detailed Construction Area-wide Soil Resource Plans (SRPs) will be produced by the nominated undertaker for geographically defined construction zones along the route of the Proposed Scheme. These plans will allocate topsoils and subsoils to different land uses and set out the methods for soil handling and storage. Extracts of these Construction Area-wide SRPs will be included in Farm Pack SRPs which will be produced and shared with affected farm holdings through detailed design stages.\r\n","Principles of Soil Handling","Paragraph 3.3, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A137","N/A","N/A","General","4.2 During construction of the Proposed Scheme appropriate measures will be implemented where necessary for the purpose of meeting the soil restoration and reinstatement principles and objectives as detailed in section 3 and paragraph 4.1 above. For example, this may include the implementation of such measures as are necessary to protect soils on land required for the Proposed Scheme over which large construction vehicles may need to be driven or hauled.\r\n\r\n","General Soil Handling","Paragraph 4.2, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A138","N/A","N/A","General","4.3  Large construction vehicles will not be driven or hauled within the land required for the Proposed Scheme from which topsoil/ subsoil has not been stripped (except for the purposes of stripping) unless protective temporary surfaces are used. Wheeled machinery will not go over soil stockpiles, unless necessary for seeding, sward maintenance or weed control.\r\n","General Soil Handling","Paragraph 4.3, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A139","N/A","N/A","General","4.4  All soil materials will be handled under suitable weather and soil conditions using appropriate machinery. The stripping, storage and reinstatement of soils will be carried out in accordance with the Construction Area-wide and Farm Holding SRPs and will be accompanied by a soil audit report produced by the nominated undertaker or his contractor.\r\n\r\n","General Soil Handling","Paragraph 4.4, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A140","N/A","N/A","General","4.5 The sources, contents and approximate volumes of soil stockpiles will be calculated from soil survey records compiled prior to the stripping and storage of soils. In defining target restored profiles the volumes of available soils in storage will be related to the areas of each parcel of land to be restored.\r\n\r\n","General Soil Handling","Paragraph 4.5, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A141","N/A","N/A","General","4.6  Soils will be handled when least susceptible to damage, and in accordance with Defra’s CCoP. The Good Practice Guide for Handling Soil 2000 (Sheets 1 to 4) describes the typical machinery that will be used in most cases to strip and transport soil materials into and out of store, and to reinstate topsoils and subsoils. For example, alternative specialised machinery will be used for landscape planting on areas with steeper slopes see section 5 below).","General Soil Handling","Paragraph 4.6, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A142","N/A","N/A","General","4.7. Defra’s CCoP describes methods for the construction of soil stockpiles and the DMRB provides guidance on the storage of topsoils for engineering purposes. These documents set out a range of heights for topsoil and subsoil storage. For the translocation of soils from sensitive donor sites the soils will generally be removed, transported and reinstated at the receptor site without a period of storage.\r\n\r\n4.8  Areas to be used for storing topsoil will first be cleared of vegetation. Areas to be used for storing subsoils will be stripped of topsoil (and this material will be temporarily stockpiled). Once the soil stockpile has been completed the area will be fenced-off to prevent any disturbance or contamination by other construction activities.\r\n","Soil Storage","Paragraph 4.8, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A143","N/A","N/A","General","4.9  Topsoils that are going to be stored for more than six months will be seeded with a low-maintenance grass mix to minimise soil erosion and prevent infestation by weeds. Where soil storage mounds are not covered with grass then during dry periods they will be sprayed with water to minimise the generation of dust.\r\n\r\n","Soil Storage","Paragraph 4.9, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A144","N/A","N/A","General","4.10  Following the placement of excavated materials, the surface will be graded to create the required contours and landform, minus the specified thickness of subsoil and topsoil cover. Excavated material may be overfilled to allow for a period of settlement to the design profile or required landform.\r\n","Placement of Excavated Materials","Paragraph 4.10, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A145","N/A","N/A","General","4.11  The subsoil and topsoil required to meet the specific requirements of the target Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) grade, landscape planting and habitat substrate will be replaced above the excavated materials. The geochemistry of imported soil materials (including its natural geochemistry) will be suitable for the environment in which it is being placed.\r\n","Placement of Excavated Materials","Paragraph 4.11, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A146","N/A","N/A","General","4.12  Reinstatement will involve topsoil being placed above subsoil. Where upper subsoil is to be replaced, it will be placed above lower subsoil. The methodology used will be based on Defra’s CCoP to minimise damage to soils. Approaches may be modified to suit particular soil types or local circumstances. The completed restoration will be cultivated to a seed bed appropriate to the first crop or vegetation, as agreed with landowners, farmers or tenants. Aftercare and subsequent monitoring will then be carried out.\r\n","Reinstatement Method","Paragraph 4.12, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A147","N/A","N/A","General","5.1  Similar soil reinstatement methods will be applied to land reinstated for landscape planting on land with shallow to moderate gradients, and where access permits. Alternative methods using specialised machinery will be applicable for landscape planting on areas with steeper slopes, particularly for cuttings and embankments. Soil placement on inward-facing railway slopes will be in accordance with the DMRB. Soil depths and fertility requirements will be specified for different planting or habitats. For the translocation of soils from sensitive donor sites efforts will be made to match the soils in donor and receptor sites.\r\n","Restoration of Landscape and Ecology","Paragraph 5.1, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A134","N/A","N/A","General","3.1  The sustainable reuse of soils displaced by the Proposed Scheme is a key mitigation measure. Conserved soils will be used for the restoration of land to agriculture, forestry, landscape planting and ecological habitat creation, as set out in the ES and the draft Code of Construction Practice (CoCP).\r\n","Principles of Soil Handling","Paragraph 3.1, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.1.","2019-09-02","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A148","N/A","N/A","General","6.1  Topsoils will be stripped from construction sites and haul routes and stockpiled. The stockpiles are likely to be used for screening the site and will be vegetated. Prior to removing the soils from the stockpiles this vegetation will be sprayed with herbicides and arisings will be removed as far as practicable.\r\n","Construction Sites and Haul Routes","Paragraph 6.1, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A149","N/A","N/A","General","6.2  Where construction sites and haul routes are returned to agriculture this will require loosening of the subsoil prior to topsoil placement. Following restoration, affected areas will enter into a period of aftercare of up to 5 years, and agricultural under-drainage may be required. Where land has been temporarily occupied, this will be undertaken by agreement with the landowner.\r\n","Construction Sites and Haul Routes","Paragraph 6.2, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A150","N/A","N/A","General","7.1  During construction on-site inspections of works will be carried out by the nominated undertaker (at a frequency that will be stated after Royal Assent to the Bill), to monitor progress and standards of restoration. Completed works will be inspected by a suitably qualified and experienced soil scientist or practitioner to certify that the land has been restored to the specifications as set out in the SRPs. Contractors will also provide an audit of soil resources following a soil survey within six months of completion of the restoration.\r\n","Monitoring","Paragraph 7.1, Information Paper E19: Soil Handling for Land Restoration.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A151","N/A","N/A","General","3.3 During construction and for a period of time after, any new planting, grassland and habitat creation will be maintained by the nominated undertaker to ensure they become established and are properly maintained.\r\n\r\n3.4 This period of initial maintenance will vary depending on the habitat or feature and the complexity and objectives for the landscape type. Tree planting, for the purpose of screening will likely require up to 5 years maintenance.\r\n\r\n3.5 After an initial period of maintenance, the nominated undertaker will seek to return the majority of land to previous landowners or other interested parties (such as local wildlife trusts, woodland trust, local authorities), where agreement can be reached that will ensure the continued objectives of the landscaping are maintained into the future.\r\n\r\n","Landscape Design for the Proposed Scheme","Paragraph 3.3 - 3.5, Information Paper E20: Maintenance of Landscaped Areas.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A152","N/A","N/A","General","3.7  For the smaller percentage of land that is required to remain within the land boundary of the Proposed Scheme, the nominated undertaker will appoint a managing company (or companies) to ensure the adequate maintenance of landscapes. Primarily, this will involve screen planting and grassland on railway earthworks within the security fence lines.\r\n","Landscape Design for the Proposed Scheme","Paragraph 3.7, Information Paper E20: Maintenance of Landscaped Areas.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A181","N/A","N/A","General","4.1 The Proposed Scheme is designed to operate a full train service during normal running hours. This means most maintenance activities will be carried out overnight. The design of the landscape within the rail corridor (i.e. within the Railway Security Fence - zones A and B in Figure 1. below) [see Information Paper E20] has been developed to reduce maintenance requirements. Zone A will be kept free of vegetation at all times in order meet railway operational requirements. There will be no tree planting within Zone B, unless this is deemed to be an important environmental requirement. The reasoning for this is explained in paragraph 4.2  [see Information Paper E20]. Instead, grassed areas with low-nutrient soils will encourage slow-growing grassland species, reducing maintenance while promoting biodiversity. \r\n","Landscape Design and Operation of the Proposed Scheme","Paragraph 4.1, Information Paper E20: Maintenance of Landscaped Areas.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A153","N/A","N/A","General","4.2  Tree planting will be designed to minimise risks to the operation of the Proposed Scheme that may arise from falling leaves, root damage and high winds breaking branches or felling trees in the vicinity. In practice, this means a 'zone of influence' will be established along the route Proposed Scheme, within which the height of vegetation will be limited. This zone - represented by Zone C in Figure 1 below may extend beyond the Railway Security Fence, depending on whether the railway is on embankment, at grade or in cutting.\r\n","Landscape Design and Operation of the Proposed Scheme","Paragraph 4.2, Information Paper E20: Maintenance of Landscaped Areas.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A154","N/A","N/A","General","6.13 Ponds are required along the Proposed Scheme to provide land, railway and road drainage, and also as ecological habitats (particularly as compensation for the loss of existing ponds). Some of these features will permanently hold water, while others (particularly land drainage) are likely to be dry for much of the year. The water bodies will be maintained to maximise their ecological value wherever this does not restrict their function as drainage features for the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n6.14 As with other landscape types, the location of these features will determine who is responsible for maintaining them in the long term. In all instances, the planting contractor will have responsibility for maintaining these features during the establishment period while habitats develop (typically two years for wetland features). Where ponds are created to compensate for loss of ponds that support great crested newts, the maintenance period will be agreed with Natural England.\r\n","Ponds and wetland habitats","Paragraphs 6.13 to 6.14, Information Paper E20: Maintenance of Landscaped Areas.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A155","N/A","N/A","General","4.3  Where a community facility is owned and operated as a commercial enterprise (i.e. is not in public or charitable ownership; or, does not provide publicly or charitably funded services) the above policies do not apply. In such cases, the nominated undertaker will work with the affected landowner to help them identify a solution which will enable them to continue to operate, on the basis that they could be eligible for compensation under the Compensation Code (see Information Paper C4 – Land Acquisition and Disposal).\r\n","Public open space and community facilities affected permanently","Paragraph 4.3, Information Paper E22: Mitigation of Significant Community Effects on Public Open Space and Community Facilities.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A205","N/A","N/A\t\t","General","5.4 The nominated undertaker will work closely with local education authorities and individual schools to identify reasonably practicable measures to mitigate residual significant in-combination and isolation effects, including discretionary, measures identified in the draft CoCP\r\n","Significant in-combination and isolation effects","Paragraph 5.4, Information Paper E22: Mitigation of Significant Community Effects on Public Open Space and Community Facilities.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A156","N/A","N/A","General","5.1 To monitor the commitments made within the Sustainability and Environmental Policies, HS2 Ltd will be assessing the design and construction of the maintenance facility (to be constructed as part of the Proposed Scheme) under BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) New Construction Non Domestic standard. BREEAM sets the standard for best practice in sustainable design and has become the de facto measure used to describe environmental performance of building\r\n5.2 HS2 Ltd has set a target that all its Stations, Depots and other railway buildings to be design and constructed for the HS2 project will achieve a minimum of an Excellent rating in this standard.\r\n","External sustainability assessment","Paragraphs 5.1 to 5.2, Information Paper E23: Approach to Sustainability.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A216","N/A","N/A\t\t","General","To ensure that our infrastructure is designed and constructed to a similar high standard, HS2 Ltd plans to use a recognised environmental rating system to assess its infrastructure works – Enabling Works, Main Works Civils and Rail Systems.","External sustainability assessment","Paragraph 5.3, Information Paper E23: Approach to Sustainability. Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A206","N/A","N/A","General","6.1 The nominated undertaker will develop an integrated investigation programme to deliver all archaeological works identified in the ES and as developed during  the detailed design process. The programme will set out the key stages of investigation, for example:\r\n- detailed desk-based assessment (where appropriate to inform location specific mitigation);\r\n- field evaluation (where appropriate to inform location specific investigation, recording and mitigation); and \r\n- location specific investigation, recording and mitigation (for example preservation in situ or archaeological excavation).\r\n","Investigation and recording of archaeological assets: Sequence and programming of works","Paragraph 6.1, Information Papers E24: Archaeology.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A207","N/A","N/A","General","6.2 The investigation programme will be developed in light of, and in conjunction with, the overall construction programme and will be reviewed and updated, as necessary. The programme will aim to undertake as much of the work as possible in advance of any construction activities. Where field evaluation works are deemed necessary, HS2 Ltd will continue to seek access to land by agreement with the landowners.\r\n","Investigation and recording of archaeological assets: Sequence and programming of works","Paragraph 6.2, Information Papers E24: Archaeology.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A208","N/A","N/A","General","6.8 Location-specific documents will address each work being carried out for the  Proposed Scheme that impact heritage assets. Therefore, location-specific documents will cover the whole of the design and construction process and the subsequent post-excavation phase of analysis and reporting.\r\n\r\n6.9 Taking account of accepted industry practice and national guidelines, location-specific documents will: - set out the scope of archaeological work in sufficient detail for it to be quantified, implemented and monitored;\r\n- define the specification for the archaeological work, the recording required, and the collection and disposal strategy for artefacts; \r\n- reflect the nature of archaeological remains that are likely to be found and the nature of the development impact, whilst allowing sufficient flexibility for variable site conditions; and\r\n- comply with the controls set out in the EMRs, including the requirement on  the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to adopt mitigation measures that will further reduce any adverse environmental impacts caused by the Proposed Scheme, insofar as these mitigation measures do not add unreasonable costs to the Proposed Scheme or  unreasonable delays to the construction programme.","Location-specific investigation","Paragraphs 6.8 to 6.9, Information Papers E24: Archaeology.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A209","N/A","N/A","General","6.10 Once archaeological investigations are complete, the records generated and the artefacts and samples collected will be analysed. The results of that work will be  published via a range of media, for example online and in specialist journals,  popular publications and academic books. Approaches to post-excavation works will be developed with Historic England and the relevant local authority. \r\n","Analysis and reporting","Paragraph 6.10, Information Papers E24: Archaeology.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A210","N/A","N/A","General","6.11 The Promoter recognises the need to deposit the nominated undertaker’s archaeological archive and will deposit it in an appropriate repository or repositories. The nominated undertaker will be committed to working with Historic England and local authorities to identify suitable repositories (such as a museum storage facilities) to enable the deposition of the artefacts and records generated by the Proposed Scheme’s archaeological investigation works.\r\n","Archiving","Paragraph 6.11, Information Papers E24: Archaeology.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A157","N/A","N/A","General","3.1  Any human remains affected by the Proposed Scheme will be treated with all due dignity, respect and care. Any impact caused by works to construct the Proposed Scheme on human remains and associated monuments is an emotive and complex matter and HS2 Ltd and the Promoter recognise their duty to address the concerns of individuals and communities.\r\n","Burial Grounds, Human Remains and Monuments","Paragraph 3.1, Information Paper E25: Burial Grounds.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A182","N/A","N/A","General","3.4. HS2 Ltd and the Promoter will continue their engagement with relevant organisations (for example Historic England, Archbishops’ Council in relation to any consecrated land and the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) in relation to burial made after 28 July 1914 and for which the CWGC is responsible) and individuals\r\nregarding the impact of the Proposed Scheme on burial grounds, human remains and associated monuments.\r\n","Engagement in relation to Burial Grounds, Human Remains and Monuments\r\n","Paragraph 3.4, Information Paper E25: Burial Grounds.  Version 1.2\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A183","N/A","N/A","General","4.3 Where burial has occurred over 100 years ago, consideration will be given to the extent of archaeological investigation and recording works. The nature and extent of any archaeological investigation will be determined in discussion with Historic England, the Archbishops’ Council (Church of England), the relevant local authority and, where applicable, other religious authorities and the Commonwealth War Graves Commission. The Heritage Memorandum and draft Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) set out the framework and management of archaeological and heritage investigations on the Proposed Scheme (see 'Framework for the Control of Impacts', below).\r\n","Burial Grounds over 100 years old\r\n","Paragraph 4.3, Information Paper E25: Burial Grounds.  Version 1.2\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A184","N/A","N/A","General","\r\n5.5 HS2 Ltd’s archaeological approach to human remains and associated funerary monuments will be developed on a case by case basis and location specific investigation will be prepared to address the impact of the construction works, focusing on the research potential of the remains.  The Heritage Memorandum sets out the Promoter’s commitment to the Historic Environment.\r\n","Archaeological approach","Paragraph 5.5, Information Paper E25: Burial Grounds.  Version 1.2\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A158","N/A","N/A","General","6.2  The risks to the health, safety and wellbeing of all staff and the public will be assessed and appropriate controls used. The nominated undertaker will work with the relevant agencies to develop an appropriate and robust control system in relation to the potential for contamination and occupational health.\r\n","Health and Safety","Paragraph 6.2, Information Paper E25: Burial Grounds.  Version 1.2","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A185","N/A","N/A","General","\r\n6.5 Permanently displaced soils will be used to reinstate soils with deeper profiles than the original where reasonably practicable. In these situations, ‘wet’ soils could be better drained and so more resilient to intense rainfall and ‘dry’ soils could be thicker and more moisture retentive to better retain water in the profile. In both cases, higher total organic matter content (in the thicker topsoil) would make them more resilient.\r\n","Permanently displaced soils ","Paragraph 6.5, Information Paper E26: Climate Change: Adaptation and Resilience.\r\nVersion 1.1\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A186","N/A","N/A","General","\r\n7.5. Work during further design stages will assess the impacts of climate change on interdependencies between the Proposed Scheme and other organisations such as rail, road, power and telecoms infrastructure operators. This will use the assessments carried out for Phase One of HS2 as its basis.  \r\n","Assessment of Impact of climate change","Paragraph 7.5, Information Paper E26: Climate Change: Adaptation and Resilience.\r\nVersion 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A187","N/A","N/A","General","7.6. Climate change resilience assessments will continue to take place throughout the design, construction and operation stages of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Climate change resilience assessments","Paragraph 7.6, Information Paper E26: Climate Change: Adaptation and Resilience.\r\nVersion 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A188","N/A","N/A","General","\r\n5.2.Accordingly HS2 Ltd will apply the following carbon minimisation hierarchy:\r\n- calculate the carbon footprint of the Proposed Scheme and use this as a tool to assess the potential to reduce carbon across the design, construction and operational phase;\r\n- consider low carbon options in developing the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n- reduce embedded carbon in construction materials and carbon emissions from construction works, where practicable;\r\n- reduce energy requirements of the Proposed Scheme and maximise the energy efficiency of operations, if reasonably practicable;\r\n- use and/or generate low carbon energy, if reasonably practicable; and\r\n- sequester carbon, if reasonably practicable.\r\n","Carbon Minimisation","Paragraph 5.2, Information Paper E27: Carbon\r\nVersion 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A189","N/A","N/A","General","\r\n5.3.This approach forms a hierarchy of actions, with avoidance generally being the most preferable option. The carbon footprint will be calculated at appropriate intervals to determine progress in carbon reduction.\r\n","Carbon Minimisation","Paragraph 5.3, Information Paper E27: Carbon\r\nVersion 1.3\r\n","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
[null,"Series G Information Papers: Consultation and engagement","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["A159","N/A","N/A","General","3.1  The nominated undertaker will develop a detailed plan for managing community engagement before and during construction. The plan will include Local Environmental Management Plans (LEMPs) and locally agreed community liaison plans. \r\n","Community Engagement","Paragraph 3.1, Information Paper G2: Community Engagement.  Version 1.1.","2019-02-15","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A160","N/A","N/A","General","3.2. The Strategy explains how HS2 Ltd is committed to being a good neighbour to communities affected by the project. It also sets out the four different types of engagement activity that HS2 Ltd undertakes:\r\n· Informing – keeping communities informed on the issues that affect them through clear, timely and tailored communications.\r\n· Consulting – arranging formal, written, public consultations on the project, where appropriate.\r\n· Involving – creating opportunities for local communities to get involved throughout the design and delivery of the project, so that HS2 Ltd can take into consideration how they live, work and play.\r\n· Responding – providing free and accessible options for communities to contact HS2 Ltd to seek information and raise their concerns. HS2 Ltd will respond to their requests and comments in a timely and comprehensive way.\r\n\t\r\n3.3 HS2 Ltd will produce Local Area Engagement Plans to explain how it will meet the commitments set out in its Community Engagement Strategy at a local level.\r\n\r\n3.4 Community engagement activities will be delivered by community engagement specialists dedicated to individual sections of the route.\r\n\r\n3.5 Engagement activity will cater for people of all backgrounds and circumstances, including vulnerable people and people with additional needs.\r\n","Community Engagement Strategy","Paragraphs 3.2 - 3.5, Information Paper G2: Community Engagement.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A161","N/A","N/A","General","4.1. The nominated undertaker will develop a Community Engagement Framework for the Proposed Scheme, in accordance with HS2 Ltd’s Community Engagement Strategy. It will be written in line with the draft CoCP and will support any specific Undertakings and Assurances given through the Parliamentary process, to be applied by the nominated undertaker and to which the contractors (and their sub-contractors) have to adhere to during the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n4.2. The framework will include the responsibilities of the nominated undertaker and contractors (and their sub-contractors) in complying with undertakings4 and performance of commitments, local agreements and specific community requirements throughout the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n4.3. The framework will explain how proactive and reactive engagement activity will be delivered during construction. This includes the approach that HS2 Ltd will take to community engagement plans, advance notification of works, complaints and enquiries, and local community investment initiatives.\r\n","Community engagement framework","Paragraphs 4.1 to 4.3, Information Paper G2: Community Engagement.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A162","N/A","N/A","General","3.1. Hs2 Ltd’s Community Engagement Strategy sets out the high level approach to community engagement, the expected behaviours and activities of all staff and suppliers and how these translate into ten community commitments, also\r\ncontained in the Residents’ Charter.\r\n\r\n3.2. The Strategy explains how HS2 is committed to being a good neighbour to communities affected by the project. It also sets out the four different types of engagement activity that HS2 undertakes:\r\n• Informing – keeping communities informed on the issues that affect them through clear, timely and tailored communications.\r\n• Consulting - arranging formal, written, public consultations on the project, where appropriate.\r\n• Involving - creating opportunities for local communities to get involved throughout the design and delivery of the project, so that HS2 can take into consideration how they live, work and play.\r\n• Responding - providing free and accessible options for communities to contact HS2 to seek information and raise their concerns. HS2 will respond to their requests and comments in a timely and comprehensive\r\nway.\r\n\r\n3.3 HS2 will produce Local Area Engagement Plans to explain how it will meet the commitments set out in its Community Engagement Strategy at a local level.\r\n \r\n3.4 Community engagement activities will be delivered by community engagement specialists dedicated to individual sections of the route.\r\n\r\n3.5 Engagement activity will cater for people of all backgrounds and circumstances, including vulnerable people and people with additional needs.\r\n","Community Engagement Strategy","Paragraph 3.1 to 3.5, Information Paper G2: Community Engagement.  Version 1.2.","2019-10-21","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A163","N/A","N/A","General","4.1 The nominated undertaker will develop a community engagement framework for the Proposed Scheme, in accordance with HS2 Ltd’s Community Engagement Strategy.  It will be written in line with the draft CoCP and will support any specific Undertakings and Assurances given through the Parliamentary process, to be applied by the nominated undertaker and to which the contractors (and their sub-contractors) have to adhere to during the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n4.2 The framework will include the responsibilities of the nominated undertaker and contractors (and their sub-contractors) in complying with undertakings and performance of commitments, local agreements and specific community requirements throughout the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n4.3 The framework will explain how proactive and reactive engagement activity will be delivered during construction. This includes the approach that HS2 will take to community liaison plans, advance notification of works, complaints and inquiries, and local community investment initiatives.\r\n","Community Engagement Framework","Paragraphs 4.1 to 4.3, Information Paper G2: Community Engagement.  Version 1.2.","2019-10-21","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A164","N/A","N/A","General","5.1. A Residents’ Charter has been developed by HS2 Ltd. It identifies ten community commitments that will be used as the basis to measure the success of the Proposed Scheme, the nominated undertaker and contractors (and sub-contractors):\r\n· Continue to build respectful, long-term relationships with affected communities and actively encourage the workforce to listen to local concerns and be considerate and accountable for their actions at all times.\r\n· Work with affected communities to develop local two-way engagement and communication programmes, ensuring they are accessible and tailored to local needs.\r\n· Make sure communities are made aware in advance of any activities taking place in their area.\r\n· Operate a Freephone community helpline 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.\r\n· Make health and safety a priority for affected communities and the workforce.\r\n· Respect the wellbeing of affected communities, minimising disruption to their lives with local mitigation plans and activities, ensuring that the standards set out in the Code of Construction Practice are met.\r\n· Leave a positive and sustainable legacy for affected communities.\r\n· Respond to questions and complaints quickly and efficiently, with an acknowledgment within - two working days, and responding within a maximum of 20 working days if the query enquiry cannot be answered straight away.\r\n· Promote awareness of all HS2 property schemes so that anyone who may be eligible has all the information they need and is aware of the support available to them.\r\n· Display the Residents’ Commissioner’s and Construction Commissioner’s contact details on all relevant materials along with HS2 Helpline information and complaints procedure.\r\n\r\n5.2. The Residents’ Charter was published in July 2017 and is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hs2-residents-charter \r\n","Residents' Charter","Paragraph 5, Information Paper G2: Community Engagement.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A165","N/A","N/A\t\t\t","General","10.1  In general, any site or area-specific community liaison groups or forums will be engaged appropriately where they already exist or are established near the start of construction. Establishment of, or use of existing, local forums will be initiated at the request of local communities. The forums will address construction related issues and concerns.\r\n","Consultation","Paragraph 10.1, Information Paper G2: Community Engagement.  Version 1.1.","2019-02-15","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
[null,"Series H Information Papers: Training and employment","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["A166","N/A","N/A","General","5.2  HS2 Ltd will:\r\n• embed equality, diversity and inclusion in all its activities;\r\n\r\n• work with stakeholders, including:\r\n- other transport providers;\r\n- affected parties including (but not limited to) tenants, landowners and occupiers;\r\n- communities;\r\n- staff;\r\n- contractors;\r\n- local and national government, and industry;\r\n\r\n• approach its activities proactively by:\r\n- minimising the potential for discrimination, harassment and bullying;\r\n- seeking out opportunities to promote inclusive development;\r\n- seeking out the views of stakeholders;\r\n- seeking to ensure that people with protected characteristics do not experience disproportionate disadvantage as a result of the planning, design, construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n\r\n• create opportunities for local, disadvantaged and underrepresented people and companies to benefit from the investment in HS2 (e.g. NCATI – National College for Advanced Transport and Infrastructure )\r\n","Embedding EDI","Paragraph 5.2, Information Paper H1: Equality, diversity and inclusion policy.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A167","N/A","N/A","General","8.1  The EDI Policy will be performance managed by the EDI Steering Group chaired by a member of the HS2 Executive Committee and implemented through HS2 Ltd's Management Systems.  Implementation by suppliers and third parties will be achieved through contracts and agreements developed by HS2 Ltd.\r\n","Implementing the EDI policy","Paragraph 8.1, Information Paper H1: Equality, diversity and inclusion policy.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A168","N/A","N/A","General","9.1  The policy will be reviewed annually or more often in the event of a significant change in circumstances including new legislation or a specific request from stakeholders.\r\n","Reviewing the EDI policy","Paragraph 9.1, Information Paper H1: Equality, diversity and inclusion policy.  Version 1.1","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A190","N/A","N/A\t","General","3.13 In situations where agencies are used to source labour, contractors will set out proposals to ensure that those agencies, including those of its subcontractors, directly support the delivery of the aims and objectives of the HS2 Ltd. Sustainability policy (summarised at U&A Ref ID A170). \r\n","Sourcing labour via agencies","Paragraph 3.13, Information Paper H2: Skills and employment.   Version 1.2.","2019-09-02","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A169","N/A","N/A","General","3.3  HS2 Ltd or the nominated undertaker will require the supply chain to  create appropriate apprenticeship and employment opportunities for local, disadvantaged and under-represented groups in order to promote fair and equal access to the employment opportunities generated by HS2.\r\n","Approach to skills and employment","Paragraph 3.3, Information Paper H2: Skills and employment.   Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A170","N/A","N/A","General","3.7 The nominated undertaker shall, insofar as it is lawful to do so, ensure equality of opportunity in order to encourage the recruitment of local, disadvantaged or under-represented groups. This is in accordance with the HS2 Ltd Sustainability Policy , which commits to “providing rewarding jobs and careers that are open to all in society, setting new standards for equality, diversity and inclusion and providing a legacy of skills, learning, expertise and experience”. This commitment is explained in greater detail in HS2’s Skills, Employment and Education Strategy. The strategy sets out four key  objectives: \r\n∙\tEnsure we have the skills to deliver the HS2 Programme and leave a skills legacy for the transport infrastructure sector and the wider UK economy\r\n∙\tCreate sustainable skills, employment and education opportunities in HS2 Ltd.’s supply chain through the use of procurement levers\r\n∙\tStimulate interest in STEM subjects to encourage more young people into transport infrastructure careers\r\n∙\tWork in partnership with stakeholders and industry as they maximise the economic and regeneration benefits of the HS2 Programme locally along the line of the route and across the UK  \r\n\r\n","Approach to skills and employment","Paragraph 3.7, Information Paper H2: Skills and employment.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A171","N/A","N/A","General","3.8 During the procurement of any relevant contract, HS2 Ltd or the nominated undertaker will seek to evaluate contractors’ responses against a number of skills and employment criteria.  The procurement process will look to assess: \r\n• at pre-qualification stage - the tenderers’ track record of delivering apprenticeships and employment interventions relevant to the requirement being procured; and \r\n• at Invitation to Tender Stage - the tenderers’ proposed method of meeting reasonable, proportionate and achievable apprenticeship and employment benchmarks stated by HS2 Ltd. Examples of the areas covered by these benchmarks will include numbers of apprenticeships, unemployed job starts, and work experience placements.\r\n\r\n3.9 The tenderers’ responses on all the above will be objectively evaluated against published criteria supplied to tenderers in advance.\r\n","Approach to skills and employment","Paragraph 3.8 - 3.9, Information Paper H2: Skills and employment.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A172","N/A","N/A","General","3.11  Contractors will be required to employ apprentices in the delivery of the works. This can be achieved through a mixture of both new apprentices being recruited as well as existing roles becoming apprenticeship opportunities.\r\n","Approach to skills and employment","Paragraph 3.11, Information Paper H2: Skills and employment.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A173","N/A","N/A","General","3.12 Contractors will be required to help local, disadvantaged and under-represented groups to access the apprenticeship and employment opportunities generated by HS2 by: \r\n∙\tplacing all job vacancies with Jobcentre Plus and any other job brokerage mechanisms that may be nominated by the nominated undertaker. HS2 Ltd is l developing an HS2 Jobs Brokerage service, which contractors will be required to be part of. Their vacancies will be advertised through a HS2  public facing jobs board and they will work with designated Job Brokerage Partners who will support those people looking for work;\r\n∙\tparticipating in relevant external recruitment and skills  events and communicating and publicising employment opportunities;\r\n∙\tnominating a suitably qualified member of staff to act as a Skills Employment and Education (SEE) Co-ordinator , with responsibility for delivering their skills, employment and education contractual requirements working with  its supply chain, and skills and employment stakeholders; and\r\n∙\tperformance managing, monitoring and reporting progress on the achievement of skills,  employment and education outputs to HS2 Ltd or the nominated undertaker. \r\n\r\n","Approach to skills and employment","Paragraph 3.12, Information Paper H2: Skills and employment.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A211","N/A","N/A","General","3.13 In situations where agencies are used to source labour, contractors will set out proposals to ensure that those agencies, including those of its subcontractors, directly support the delivery of the aims and objectives of the HS2 Ltd. Sustainability policy (summarised at U&A Ref ID: A170).","Sourcing labour via agencies","Paragraph 3.13, Information Paper H2: Skills and employment.  Version 1.3","2021-02-11","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
[null,"Undertakings and assurances extracted from Promoter Responses to Select Committee Reports and having general application ","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["A175","N/A","N/A","General","The Promoter will also scope a long-term project to monitor the environmental impact of moving ancient woodland, to inform any future proposals for the translocation of ancient woodland.","Ancient woodland","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's First Special Report of Session 2017-2019, paragraph 26","2018-06-25","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A212","N/A","N/A","General","80. HS2 Ltd will report the progress in reusing excavated material and will publish relevant data annually.\r\n","Excavated material","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's Third Special Report of Session 2017-2019, paragraph 80","2019-06-24","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A213","N/A","N/A","General","58. In order to meet the Select Committee recommendation, the Promoter will work with HS2 Ltd to develop more detailed guidance on its atypical arrangements, including in respect of assured short hold tenancies, agricultural tenancies and movable homes, and consider what other improvements can be made to increase awareness and accessibility for those likely to be affected by HS2.  \r\n\r\n59. The Select Committee has identified that the compensation entitlements of houseboat residents that are affected by public works differ in law from some other types of resident who live in movable homes.  The Promoter will review current property compensation arrangements for movable/mobile homes and carry out the necessary consultation to explore in particular: \r\n\r\n• whether there is a case to bring houseboats into line with caravans in respect of statutory home loss payment entitlement; \r\n\r\n• whether there is a case to introduce regulations to compensate houseboat residents who are impacted by significant noise disturbance from rail works; and \r\n\r\n• the potential use of non-statutory compensation measures in advance of legislation being made should the case for change be established. \r\n\r\n60. In the interim, and in view of the Select Committee’s instruction, the Promoter will identify the relevant houseboat owners on Phase 2a that are impacted by HS2, and ensure that HS2 Ltd’s Phase 2a community engagement team publicise to them that they may request for their case to be considered atypically. Funding arrangements for atypical assistance are already in place, so the Promoter does not propose to establish a distinct fund for houseboat owners specifically at this stage.   The Promoter would seek to apply principles in assessing houseboat owners’ eligibility to compensation and non-statutory assistance similar to those that are applied to eligible tenants, as far as is appropriate.  \r\n","Atypical arrangements","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's Third Special Report of Session 2017-2019, paragraphs 58 - 60","2019-06-24","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["A214","N/A","N/A","General","109. In response to the Select Committee’s request, the Promoter will provide additional funding for signage to help pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders navigate changes to the road and public rights of way network and away from construction traffic.  As part of the detailed design process, the Promoter will work with highway authorities, local access forums, user groups (for example The Ramblers) and communities to identify the best way of maintaining public rights of way during construction, including the appropriate provision of such signage. \r\n","Cycling, footpaths and bridleways","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's Third Special Report of Session 2017-2019, paragraph 109","2019-06-24","Assurance","Routewide\t","Routewide"]
[null,"Commitments made at Report Stage in the House of Lords","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["A217","N/A","N/A","General","544. As for the memorial woodland mentioned by my noble friend Lord Randall, I am aware of the case. As he knows, because we have corresponded about it, HS2 Ltd is supporting the hospice and the affected families and will have discussions with the hospice and the landowner about creating a suitable memorial in this location once the works have concluded.","Engagement – Phase One memorial woodland","Baroness Vere speech at Report stage, first day, 30 November 2020 (see Column 544 in Hansard)","2020-11-30","Assurance","N/A","N/A"]
["A218","N/A","N/A","General","1193. Furthermore, by not defining the term “impacts”, HS2 Ltd will report on a wide range of issues relating to ancient woodlands, including those that could potentially be caused by non-compliance with the code of construction practice. The reporting will include measures undertaken relating to breaches of assurances for ancient woodland and lessons learned, should they occur—and, of course, we all hope that they do not.","Ancient woodland","Baroness Vere speech at Report stage, second day, 8 December 2020 (see Column 1193 in Hansard) ","2020-12-08","Assurance","N/A","N/A"]
["A219","N/A","N/A","General","1194. By committing HS2 Ltd to report on non-compliance with the measures set out in the code of construction practice, we are ensuring that all these impacts are captured and are not limited to the narrower definition of impacts in the amendment proposed by the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb. Further, the reporting will include the variance between what ancient woodland the environmental statement has assessed will be lost or impacted by HS2 and what actually occurs.","Ancient woodland","Baroness Vere speech at Report stage, second day, 8 December 2020 (see Column 1194 in Hansard)","2020-12-08","Assurance","N/A","N/A"]
["A220","N/A","N/A","General","1194. I will go further. I am pleased to commit HS2 Ltd to reporting on the volume of metres cubed of ancient woodland soils that have been translocated, and to reporting on the number of hectares of ancient woodland compensation and restoration that have been included in the detailed design of the scheme. I am also pleased to commit the company to reporting on the number of hectares of ancient woodland creation and restoration delivered through all HS2 funds that deliver woodland creation. The intention is to publish the ancient woodland impact reports in the annual environmental report. ","Ancient woodland","Baroness Vere speech at Report stage, second day, 8 December 2020 (see Column 1194 in Hansard","2020-12-08","Assurance","N/A","N/A"]
["A221","N/A","N/A","General","1211. I appreciate that these matters can be legally and technically complex. That is why I am pleased that the noble Earl has been liaising with departmental officials as they start to develop non-statutory guidance on how Schedule 23 is designed to operate in relation to phases 1 and 2a of HS2. Furthermore, I am delighted to hear that the noble Earl has already been in touch with his colleagues at the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and that they are very happy to be involved. Of course, my officials will work very closely with it, and they will also work closely with officials in the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government on the draft guidance, which is intended to set out how Schedule 23 applies and to make the legal effects clear. Officials are keen to include areas of best practice, and, if possible, officials would like to include advice from the president of the Institution of Civil Engineers on how to appoint the most appropriate professional should a dispute arise.\r\n","Guidance on party walls","Baroness Vere speech at Report stage, second day, 8 December 2020 (see Column 1211 in Hansard)","2020-12-08","Assurance","N/A","N/A"]
[null,"Section B: protective provisions agreements (PPAs)","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["B1","Network Rail Infrastructure Limited","N/A","N/A\t",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["B1.1","N/A","N/A\t","Network Rail Infrastructure Limited","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport","Protective Provisions","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and Network Rail Infrastructure Limited","2018-01-30","Undertaking","Routewide","Routewide"]
["B2","United Kingdom Oil Pipelines Limited","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["B2.1","N/A","HoC/0093","United Kingdom Oil Pipelines Limited","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport","Protective Provisions","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and United Kingdom Oil Pipelines Limited","2019-01-25","Undertaking","Routewide","Routewide"]
["B3","National Grid Electricity Transmissions Plc","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["B3.1","N/A","AP2/0042","National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport","Protective Provisions","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and \r\nNational Grid Electricity Transmission Plc","2019-05-13","Undertaking","Routewide","Routewide"]
["B4","Cadent Gas Plc","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["B4.1","N/A","AP2/0031","Cadent Gas","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport","Protective Provisions","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and Cadent Gas","2019-05-13","Undertaking","Routewide","Routewide"]
["B5","National Grid Gas Plc","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["B5.1","N/A","AP2/0043","National Grid Gas Plc","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport","Protective Provisions","Undertaking between the  SoS for Transport and National Grid Gas Plc","2019-05-13","Undertaking","Routewide","Routewide"]
["B6","South Staffordshire Water","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["B6.1","N/A","HoC/0160","South Staffordshire Water","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport","Protective Provisions","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and South Staffordshire Water Plc","2019-12-11","Undertaking","Routewide","Routewide"]
["B7","Mainline Pipelines","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["B7.1","N/A","N/A","Mainline Pipelines","See undertaking between the Secretary of State for Transport and Mainline Pipelines","Various","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and Mainline Pipelines","2020-05-25","Undertaking","Various","N/A"]
[null,"Section C: undertakings and assurances given to specific third parties","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C1","Conningham, Major Raymond and Doctor Dianne Barre","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C1.1","N/A","N/A","Major Raymond Conningham and Doctor Dianne Barre","The Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition under the Bill in relation to land at 1 Kings Walk, land parcel 202 in the Parish of Kings Bromley as shown on the attached plan[attached to beneficiary letter].\r\n","Compulsory acquisition","Letter from Lucy Lagerweij (HS2) to Major Raymond Conningham and Doctor Dianne Barre","2017-07-17","Assurance","Land parcel 202\r\nKings Walk, Kings Bromley, Burton-on-Trent, DE13 7JU","Lichfield District"]
["C2","Cristall, Angela Mary","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C2.1","N/A","N/A","Angela Mary Cristall","The Secretary of State will not, and will require the nominated undertaker not to, exercise the powers in the Bill so to permanently acquire or take temporary possession of Plot No. 1 for the purposes of carrying out any HS2 Phase 2A related construction works.  Plot No. 1 being the area of land marked with a ‘1’ in the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] and identified as Plot 1 on Sheet No. 1-22 of the Plans accompanying the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill and being land described in the Book of Reference accompanying the Bill as comprising access track and hedgerow owned by Angela Mary Cristall and Richard Edward James.\r\n","Compulsory acquisition","Letter from Lucy Lagerweij (HS2) to Angela Mary Cristall\t","2017-09-01","Assurance","The Hollies\r\nBishton Lane\r\nWolseley Bridge\r\nStafford \r\nST18 0XE\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C3","James, Gillian","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C3.1","N/A","N/A","Gillian James","The Secretary of State will not, and will require the nominated undertaker not to, exercise the powers in the Bill so to permanently acquire or take temporary possession of Plot No. 1 for the purposes of carrying out any HS2 Phase 2A related construction works.  Plot No. 1 being the area of land marked with a ‘1’ in the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] and identified as Plot 1 on Sheet No. 1-22 of the Plans accompanying the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill and being land described in the Book of Reference accompanying the Bill as comprising access track and hedgerow owned by Angela Mary Cristall and Richard Edward James).\r\n","Compulsory acquisition\t","Letter from Lucy Lagerweij (HS2) to Gillian James","2017-09-01","Assurance","The Hollies\r\nBishton Lane\r\nWolseley Bridge\r\nStafford \r\nST18 0XE","Stafford Borough"]
["C4","James, Richard Edward","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C4.1","N/A","N/A","Richard Edward James","The Secretary of State will not, and will require the nominated undertaker not to, exercise the powers in the Bill so to permanently acquire or take temporary possession of Plot No. 1 for the purposes of carrying out any HS2 Phase 2A related construction works.  Plot No. 1 being the area of land marked with a ‘1’ in the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] and identified as Plot 1 on Sheet No. 1-22 of the Plans accompanying the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill and being land described in the Book of Reference accompanying the Bill as comprising access track and hedgerow owned by Angela Mary Cristall and Richard Edward James).\r\n","Compulsory acquisition","Letter from Lucy Lagerweij (HS2) to Richard Edward James","2017-09-01","Assurance","The Hollies\r\nBishton Lane\r\nWolseley Bridge\r\nStafford \r\nST18 0XE","Stafford Borough"]
["C5","Broome Manor Limited","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C5.1","N/A","N/A","Broome Manor Limited","The Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition under the Bill in relation to land parcel 202 in the Parish of Kings Bromley as shown on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter].\r\n","Compulsory acquisition","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to G R Smith (Broome Manor Limited)","2018-01-02","Assurance","Land parcel 202\r\nKings Walk, Kings Bromley, Burton-on-Trent, DE13 7JU","Lichfield District"]
["C6","Whitmore Parish Council","N/A\t\t\t","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C6.1","N/A","HoC/0090","Whitmore Parish Council","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to not use, as an HS2 Heavy Goods Vehicle construction lorry route, any part of Manor Road not identified as such on page 116 of the Environmental Statement Volume 5 Traffic and Transport map book (attached), other than:\r\n\r\n(a)\tin the case of emergencies, or\r\n\r\n(b)\tif required to do so by the local authority.\r\n\r\nFor the avoidance of doubt, construction worker traffic (cars/Light Goods Vehicles) may continue to use the whole length of Manor Road.","HS2 Heavy Goods Vehicles","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Ian Webb (Whitmore Parish Council)","2018-03-20","Assurance","Manor Road, Whitmore Parish","Newcastle-under-Lyme"]
["C7","The National Farmers Union","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C7.1","N/A","HoC/0107","The National Farmers Union","1.1.The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to ensure that there is an agricultural liaison service providing individuals experienced in agricultural matters in place and contactable by telephone 24 hours a day, 7 days per week, during the construction of HS2 works on agricultural land.\r\n1.2. The Secretary of State will require that the Nominated Undertaker will:\r\n1.2.1 .Provide the name and contact details of the agricultural liaison service provider(s) (and any replacement) to the NFU before he or she takes up his or her post;\r\n1.2.2. Arrange meetings between the agricultural liaison service provider(s) and the NFU on a regular basis, [and at least every three months] to discuss the activities of the agricultural liaison service provider.\r\n","Agricultural liaison service","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Alistair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), Annex A, assurance 1","2018-05-31","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C7.2","N/A","HoC/0107","The National Farmers Union","2.1\tWhere -\r\n2.1.1 detailed design plans of the proposed railway works are sufficiently advanced to enable the Secretary of State to assess, in his reasonable opinion, the extent of relevant land required permanently for the construction, operation and maintenance of the permanent railway corridor comprised within the Scheduled works for the Bill, and\r\n2.1.2 the exercise of such powers is in his reasonable opinion required for the timely and economic delivery of HS2 Phase 2a works, \r\nthe Secretary of State will exercise acquisition powers over relevant land rather than exercise temporary possession powers over relevant land.\r\n2.2 In advance of the exercise by the Secretary of State of acquisition powers over relevant land pursuant to paragraph 2.1, the Nominated Undertaker shall not, save where otherwise agreed with the relevant landowner, or where subject to paragraph 2.3, exercise temporary possession powers over relevant land.\r\n2.3 Pursuant to paragraph 2.2, the Nominated Undertaker may exercise temporary possession powers over relevant land in advance of acquisition powers where in the reasonable opinion of the Nominated Undertaker, the relevant land is required to be occupied temporarily for the purpose of –\r\n 2.3.1 programme critical construction works including but not limited to, works to establish construction access routes,\r\n2.3.2 environmental mitigation works,\r\n2.3.3 utility works; or\r\n2.3.4 highway works, which cannot be undertaken pursuant to the exercise of acquisition powers whilst also being consistent with the timely and economic delivery of HS2 Phase 2a works.\r\n2.4 In these assurances- \r\n“acquisition powers” means the power of compulsory acquisition of land to be conferred on the Secretary of State under clause 4 of the Bill;\r\n“agricultural land” means land classified as agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988;\r\n“relevant landowner” means the freehold owner and occupier of agricultural land;\r\n“relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the relevant landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Secretary of State of acquisition powers for the purposes of the construction, operation and maintenance of the permanent railway corridor comprised within the Scheduled works for the Bill;\r\n“temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1(2) of schedule 15 to the Bill.","Agricultural land acquired for the purposes of the permanent railway corridor","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Alistair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), Annex A, assurance 2.1","2018-05-31","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C7.3","N/A","HoC/0107","The National Farmers Union","The Secretary of State will, in line with wider Government policies, require the Nominated Undertaker to pay promptly compensation that has been agreed or determined by the Upper Tribunal of the Lands Chamber to be payable to a claimant under the Bill in respect of the compulsory acquisition of agricultural land/rural businesses.\r\n","Prompt payment of compensation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Alistair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), Annex A, assurance 3","2018-05-31","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C7.4","N/A","HoC/0107","The National Farmers Union","4.1 Where a farmer/rural business owner submits to the Promoter detailed particulars of an estimated claim for compensation arising from the compulsory acquisition of agricultural land/a rural business (a “detailed request”), the Promoter will provide in writing within three months of receipt of the detailed request the Nominated Undertaker's estimate of the compensation (including for disturbance) payable in respect of the compulsory purchase of that agricultural land/rural business.\r\n4.2 Where possession of land is taken by the Nominated Undertaker under Schedule 15 of the Bill and an owner occupier or agricultural tenant submits to the Promoter a particularised and evidenced claim for compensation based upon agricultural losses arising from the temporary occupation of agricultural land pursuant to paragraph 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 15 to the Bill (a “compensation request”), the Promoter will make interim payments of compensation as appropriate on a case by case basis. For example, payments could be made on a three monthly, six monthly or (as a minimum) annual basis taking account of the particular characteristics of the agricultural business in question. Before making the interim payments, the Nominated Undertaker may require the owner occupier or agricultural tenant to enter into a Temporary Possession Agreement in advance of the exercise of powers.\r\n","Estimated claims for compensation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Alistair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), Annex A, assurance 4","2018-05-31","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C7.5","N/A","HoC/0107","The National Farmers Union","5.1 In respect of farmers/rural business owners, the Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with that farmer/rural business owner, where a business case is approved and where it relates to a relocation necessary for a particular business in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Promoter of land required for that business, such agreement to provide that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Promoter being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured.","Relocation matters","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Alistair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), Annex A, assurance 5","2018-05-31","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C7.6","N/A","HoC/0107","The National Farmers Union","6.1 The Secretary of State confirms that the Nominated Undertaker will be liable to farmers and rural business owners for the actionable acts and omissions of the Nominated Undertaker's contractors and sub-contractors in constructing the works authorised by the Bill, and as a consequence the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to:\r\n6.1.1 Set in place arrangements to deal promptly with any claims made by farmers and rural business owners arising as a consequence of the construction of the works authorised by the Bill (including as a consequence of the acts or omissions of the Nominated Undertaker's contractors and sub-contractors).\r\n6.2 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to implement contractual monitoring, reporting and enforcement procedures to ensure that third party claims against the Nominated Undertaker arising out of the execution of HS2 works on the farmer/rural business owner's land are being dealt with promptly and effectively.\r\n","Liability and claims","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Alistair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), Annex A, assurance 6","2018-05-31","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C7.7","N/A","HoC/0107","The National Farmers Union","7.1 Where an existing private water supply to a farm is adversely and directly, affected by the construction of the Proposed Works, the Nominated Undertaker will, if requested by the farmer or landowner to do so, provide or procure or meet the reasonable cost of the provision of an alternative supply of water where reasonably practicable to do so and if there is no other practicable alternative means of supply available.\r\n7.2 Where the supply is so affected temporarily by the construction of the Proposed Works, then the alternative supply need only be supplied for the period during which it is so affected.\r\n7.3 Where a request is made by the farmer or landowner under 7.1 for a permanent supply due to permanent severance of the existing supply caused by the construction of the Proposed Works the Nominated Undertaker will where provision of an alternative means of supply can be demonstrated by the land owner/farmer to be reasonably required for his business, provide or procure or meet the reasonable cost of a permanent means of alternative supply of water.","Water supply","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Alistair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), Annex A, assurance 7","2018-05-31","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C7.8","N/A","HoC/0107","The National Farmers Union","9.1\tNotwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers but subject to paragraph 9.2, the Nominated Undertaker will provide at least 3 months’ written notice in advance of the date of entry to the landowner and any occupier in respect of the relevant land to be occupied under temporary possession powers (“the Notice”).\r\n9.2\tThe Nominated Undertaker may temporarily occupy relevant land in exercise of temporary possession powers (and thereby give no less than 28 days’ notice) in the following circumstances:-\r\n9.2.1\twhere following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the Notice, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the Notice was served;\r\n9.2.2\twhere following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the Notice, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the Notice due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n9.2.3\twhere the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the Notice.\r\n9.3\tIn this assurance:- \r\n9.3.1\t“intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the Notice; \r\n9.3.2\t“relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercises by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n9.3.3\t“temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n","Notice of taking temporary possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Alistair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), Annex A, assurance 9","2019-04-18","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C8","The Country Land and Business Association","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C8.1","N/A","HoC/0140\r\n","The Country Land and Business Association","1.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to ensure that there are agricultural liaison service providing individuals experienced in agricultural matters in place and contactable by telephone 24 hours a day, 7 days per week, during the construction of HS2 works on agricultural land.\r\n1.2. The Secretary of State will require that the Nominated Undertaker will:\r\n1.2.1. Provide the name and contact details of the agricultural liaison service provider(s) (and any replacement) to the CLA before he or she takes up his or her post;\r\n1.2.2. Arrange meetings between the agricultural liaison service provider(s) and the CLA on a regular basis, [and at least every three months] to discuss the activities of the agricultural liaison service provider.\r\n","Agricultural liaison service","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew Shirley,  Annex A, assurance 1","2018-05-02","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C8.2","N/A","HoC/0140\r\n","The Country Land and Business Association","2.1. The Secretary of State will, in line with wider Government policies, require the Nominated Undertaker to pay promptly compensation that has been agreed or determined by the Upper Tribunal of the Lands Chamber to be payable to a claimant under the Bill in respect of the compulsory acquisition of agricultural land/rural businesses.\r\n","Prompt payment of compensation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew Shirley,   Annex A, assurance 2.1","2018-05-02","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C8.3","N/A","HoC/0140\r\n","The Country Land and Business Association","3.1. Where a farmer/rural business owner submits to the Promoter detailed particulars of an estimated claim for compensation arising from the compulsory acquisition of agricultural land/a rural business (a “detailed request”), the Promoter will provide in writing within three months of receipt of the detailed request the Nominated Undertaker's estimate of the compensation (including for disturbance) payable in respect of the compulsory purchase of that agricultural land/rural business.\r\n3.2 Where possession of land is taken by the Nominated Undertaker under Schedule 15 of the Bill and an owner occupier or agricultural tenant submits to the Promoter a particularised and evidenced claim for compensation based upon agricultural losses arising from the temporary occupation of agricultural land pursuant to paragraph 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 15 to the Bill  (a “compensation request”), the Promoter will make interim payments of compensation as appropriate on a case by case basis, taking account of the particular characteristics of the agricultural business in question. Before making the interim payments, the Nominated Undertaker may require the owner occupier or agricultural tenant to enter into a Temporary Possession Agreement in advance of the exercise of powers.","Estimated claims for compensation ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew Shirley, Annex A, assurance 3.1 and 3.2","2018-05-02","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C8.4","N/A","HoC/0140","The Country Land and Business Association","4.1. In respect of farmers/rural business owners, the Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with that farmer/rural business owner, where a business case is approved and where it relates to a relocation necessary for a particular business in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Promoter of land required for that business, such agreement to provide that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Promoter being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured.","Relocation matters","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew Shirley Annex A, assurance 4.1","2018-05-02","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C8.5","N/A","HoC/0140","The Country Land and Business Association","5.1. The Secretary of State confirms that the Nominated Undertaker will be liable to farmers and rural business owners for the actionable acts and omissions of the Nominated Undertaker's contractors and sub-contractors in constructing the works authorised by the Bill, and as a consequence the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to:\r\n5.1.1 Set in place arrangements to deal promptly with any claims made by farmers and rural business owners arising as a consequence of the construction of the works authorised by the Bill (including as a consequence of the acts or omissions of the Nominated Undertaker's contractors and sub-contractors).\r\n5.2. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to implement contractual monitoring, reporting and enforcement procedures to ensure that third party claims against the Nominated Undertaker arising out of the execution of HS2 works on the farmer/rural business owner's land are being dealt with promptly and effectively.\r\n","Liability and claims\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew Shirley Annex A, assurance 5.1","2018-05-02","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C9","Staffordshire County Council","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C9.1","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","1 (a) Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set out in paragraph (c) below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to reduce the height of the Kings Bromley Viaduct by up to 3m at the highest horizontal level shown on Sheet Nos. 2-01 and 2-02 of the sections deposited with the Bill for that part of Work No. 1 on the Kings Bromley Viaduct together with any consequential and associated reduction in height of both the Bourne Embankment and the River Trent Viaduct (“the Lowered Viaduct”). The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to act in good faith in seeking to achieve as great a decrease in height as far as reasonably practicable (up to 3m) under this paragraph (without prejudice to the need for all parties to act in good faith generally in respect of these assurances) and to engage with Staffordshire County Council during the detailed design stage in respect of the implementation of this paragraph; and\r\n\r\n(b) Subject to the satisfaction of paragraph (a) and the conditions set out in paragraph (c) below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to seek to further reduce the height of the Lowered Viaduct so far as is reasonably practicable and to act in good faith and to engage with Staffordshire County Council during the detailed design stage in respect of this (without prejudice to the need for all parties to act in good faith generally in respect of these assurances).\r\n\r\n(c) The conditions referred to in paragraph (a) and (b) above are:\r\n(i) the successful promotion of an amendment to the Bill through the introduction of an Additional Provision which confers on the Secretary of State the powers for the Lowered Viaduct (if required to authorise any further necessary lands or works powers necessary for the construction or maintenance of the Lowered Viaduct) (“the Additional Provision”) and the inclusion in a Supplementary Environmental Statement of an assessment of the significant environmental effects of the Lowered Viaduct;\r\n\r\n(ii) the Promoter being satisfied that the Lowered Viaduct, or any further reduction in height of the Lowered Viaduct, can be delivered as part of the works authorised by the Bill (as amended by the Additional Provision if required as set out in sub-paragraph (i) above) and without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement or any Supplementary Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n\r\n(iii) the Promoter securing any and all necessary consents for delivering the Lowered Viaduct, or any further reduction in height of the Lowered Viaduct, and any associated works and conveniences, including the approval (if necessary) of the relevant highway authority, Environment Agency and lead local flood authority; and\r\n\r\n(iv) the Promoter being of the view that the Lowered Viaduct, or any further reduction in height of the Lowered Viaduct, can be delivered without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Bourne Embankment” means that part of Work No. 1 on embankment between the Kings Bromley Viaduct and the River Trent Viaduct;\r\n\r\n“Kings Bromley Viaduct” means that part of Work No. 1 on viaduct over Work No. 7 and Work No. 9 at a height as shown on Sheet Nos. 2-01 and 2-02 of the sections deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n“the River Trent Viaduct” means that part of Work No. 1 on viaduct over Work No. 11 and the River Trent;\r\n\r\n“Work No. 1” means the scheduled work identified with that number in Schedule 1 to the Bill together with all necessary works and conveniences;\r\n\r\n“Work No. 7” means the scheduled work identified with that number in Schedule 1 to the Bill together with all necessary works and conveniences; and\r\n\r\n“Work No. 9” means the scheduled work identified with that number in Schedule 1 to the Bill together with all necessary works and conveniences;\r\n\r\n“Work No. 11” means the scheduled work identified with that number in Schedule 1 to the Bill together with all necessary works and conveniences.","Lowering of Kings Bromley Viaduct","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis","2018-04-26","Assurance","Kings Bromley Viaduct","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.2","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to restrict HS2 Large Goods Vehicle construction traffic from entering the village of Kings Bromley and using the A513 Alrewas Road within the village as a through route, except:\r\ni. in circumstances where it is required to do so by the relevant planning authority under the powers conferred on it by paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill, or\r\nii. in circumstances where it would not be reasonably practicable to use other access routes, for example (but not limited to) in respect of any utilities works proposed within the village of Kings Bromley as part of the Proposed Scheme, or\r\niii. in the case of an emergency or if directed to do so by the police or emergency services, or\r\niv. where, it would prejudice the safe, timely and economic construction and/or operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Kings Bromley not to be used for HS2 LGV construction traffic","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 1","2018-05-08","Assurance","Kings Bromley\t","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.3","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","2. (a) Recognising that the local highway authority would like the temporary roundabout proposed in the Bill at the junction of the A513 Rugeley Road and A515 Lichfield Road and shown on Map Number CT-05-202 in the CA1 Fradley to Colton Map book, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement (“the Temporary Roundabout”) to be made permanent, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to design and construct the works to provide the Temporary Roundabout in a manner that does not preclude this subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:\r\n(b) The conditions referred to in paragraph (a) are:\r\ni. the nominated undertaker being satisfied that the permanent retention of the Temporary Roundabout can be delivered without the need for any additional land to that included within the limits of land to be acquired and used in the Bill;\r\nii. Staffordshire County Council securing the necessary consents and approvals to enable the permanent retention and adoption of the Temporary Roundabout, under relevant legislation prior to the Temporary Roundabout being removed by the nominated undertaker.\r\n(c) Nothing in this assurance shall require the Promoter or nominated undertaker to retain the works in paragraph (a) permanently or seek any powers or consents for the permanent retention of the Temporary Roundabout.\r\n","Temporary roundabout A513/A515 and use of Kings Bromley for traffic involved in its construction","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 2","2018-05-08","Assurance","Kings Bromley","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.4","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","3. (a) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to explore, and subject to the conditions in sub-paragraph (c) implement, options for maximising, as far as is reasonably practicable, the volume of materials and equipment brought in, and the volume of excavated material removed, by rail via the Stone railhead once that railhead is operational. In exploring those options, the nominated undertaker must balance the wider environmental impacts to the local community with the impact on rail passenger services.\r\n(b) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to respond to any reasonable request made by Staffordshire County Council for information about the progress made in exploring the options mentioned in paragraph (a).\r\n(c) The conditions in paragraph (a) are that such options:\r\ni. must be deliverable within the existing powers of the Bill;\r\nii. are subject to the availability of train paths; and\r\niii. must not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.","Maximising the use of the Stone railhead and the rail connection to the IMB-R","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 3","2018-05-08","Assurance","Stone railhead and the rail connection to the IMB-R","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.5","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","4. (a) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to explore, and, as far as is reasonably practicable and subject to the availability of train paths, implement options for maximising the use of the Norton Bridge to Stone Railway connection to the Stone IMB-R for the movement of materials and equipment involved in maintenance works during the operation of the Proposed Scheme. In exploring those options, the nominated undertaker must balance the wider environmental impacts to the local community with the impact on rail passenger services.\r\n(b) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to respond to any reasonable request made by Staffordshire County Council for information about progress made in exploring the options mentioned in paragraph (a).\r\n","Maximising the use of the Stone railhead and the rail connection to the IMB-R","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 4","2018-05-08","Assurance","Stone railhead and the rail connection to the IMB-R","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.6","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","5. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to, subject to securing the necessary consents and approvals under the Bill and in so far as is consistent with the Environmental Statement, use reasonable endeavours to ensure that at the Stone IMB-R:\r\n(a) a landscape, noise and flood mitigation bund, of 430m in length and 3m in height is provided to the west of the M6 and north of the realigned Yarnfield Lane to provide noise and visual screening for properties to the west of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n(b) a landscape bund 90m in length and 3m in height, is located at the eastern extent of the Norton Bridge to Stone sidings with a noise fence barrier, 2m in height, along the top of the landscape bund to provide visual and acoustic screening for Micklow House Farm and residents of properties in Walton\r\n","Noise at Stone Infrastructure Maintenance Base – Rail","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 5","2018-05-08","Assurance","Stone Infrastructure Maintenance Base ","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.7","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n6. (a) The Promoter will (subject to any necessary consents or approvals being in place) require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to complete the construction and commissioning of the M6 Slip Roads as soon as reasonably practicable in the main civil engineering works construction programme for the Proposed Scheme.\r\n(b) The Promoter will (subject to any necessary consents or approvals being in place) require the nominated undertaker to ensure that, upon the opening of the completed M6 Slip Roads to HS2 construction traffic, it will use reasonable endeavours to maximise the use of the M6 Slip Roads by HS2 Large Goods Vehicle construction traffic, so far as reasonably practicable, for access to and egress from the Stone railhead main compound so as to reduce so far as reasonably practicable the use of Yarnfield Lane by HS2 Large Goods Vehicle construction traffic accessing the Stone railhead main compound.","Yarnfield Lane","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 6","2018-05-08","Assurance","Yarnfield Lane","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.8","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n7. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to limit the external elevation of the building comprising the Yarnfield North Embankment satellite compound Temporary Worker Accommodation and any temporary office buildings within this compound to two storeys.","Height of Yarnfield North Embankment Temporary Worker Accommodation and any Office Buildings","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 7","2018-05-08","Assurance","Yarnfield North Embankment ","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.9","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","8. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to limit the external elevation of any permanent buildings at the Stone IMB-R constructed under the powers in the Bill to two storeys.","Height of permanent buildings at the Stone IMB-R","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 8","2018-05-08","Assurance","Stone IMB-R","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.10","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","9.(a) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to treat the Stone railhead main compound as 'medium risk' as set out in the Institute of Air Quality Management (IAQM) 'Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction', 2014 as revised from time to time (“IAGM, 2014”) for the purposes of worksite boundary construction dust monitoring unless and until it is demonstrated by the appointed contractor that the Stone railhead main compound does not meet the criteria to be classed as medium risk under IAQM, 2014.\r\n(b) Worksite boundary construction dust monitoring will be undertaken at the Stone railhead main compound for any such period that it is treated as medium risk under (a) above as set out in Section 7.3 of the draft Code of Construction Practice, and the results will be reported back to the relevant local authority as set out in Section 4.3 of the draft Code of Construction Practice","Dust monitoring at Stone railhead main compound","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 9","2018-05-08","Assurance","Stone railhead","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.11","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n10.The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours in the design of the Stone IMB-R to:\r\n(a)reduce, so far as is reasonably practicable, the footprint of the permanent works included in the Stone IMB-R (other than any mitigation works); and\r\n(b)explore, and so far as is reasonably practicable, implement options for local placement of excavated material to create additional visual screening of the permanent works included in the Stone IMB-R (other than any mitigation works), and can be achieved within the existing powers of the Bill and the limits of land to be acquired or used within the Bill plans for the purpose of the Stone IMB-R.\r\n(c)The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to respond to any reasonable request made by Staffordshire County Council for information about progress made in exploring the options mentioned in paragraphs (a) & (b).","Footprint of Stone IMB-R","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 10","2018-05-08","Assurance","Stone IMB-R","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.12","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","11.(a) In managing the HS2 Large Goods Vehicle construction traffic within the Petitioner’s administrative boundary and in order to reduce the impact of HS2 Large Goods Vehicle construction traffic on the local road network, the Promoter shall, subject to the conditions in paragraph (b), require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to:\r\n(i) commence construction of each Haul Road as soon as reasonably practicable following commencement of main civil engineering works in the construction programme for the Proposed Scheme, having regard to the purpose of each Haul Road; and\r\n(ii) prioritise the use of the Haul Roads by HS2 LGV construction traffic so far as reasonably practicable above the use of the local road network.\r\n(c) The conditions referred to in paragraph (a) above are:\r\n(i) the securing of any necessary consents and approvals; and\r\n(ii) the Promoter being satisfied that doing so would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance “Haul Roads” means those haul routes described in the Environmental Statement as proposed within the limits of land to be acquired or used as shown on the plans deposited with the Bill.\r\n","Haul roads","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 11","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.13","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","12. (a) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in exercising the powers of the Bill to carry out Road Widening Works to explore and, where reasonably practicable, implement options to avoid the need to remove existing hedgerows during the widening works, for example by carrying out the widening on only one side of the existing road, so far as doing so can be done: within the existing powers of the Bill and without the need for any additional land from that identified on the deposited plans as within the limits of land to be acquired or used for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme; and without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme, including having regard to the safety of all road users and particularly pedestrians, cyclists and equestrians.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Road Widening Works” means those works authorised by the Bill to widen those existing highways not forming part of the Strategic Road Network or other ‘A’ roads within Staffordshire County Council’s administrative boundary which have existing hedgerows at the boundary of the highways which are within the limits of land identified on the deposited plans as within the limits of land to be acquired or used for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme.","Impact on hedgerows","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 12","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.14","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","13.The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in exercising the powers of the Bill to carry out works which the Environmental Statement reports might result in the loss of any Veteran Trees to explore and, where reasonably practicable, implement options to avoid in each case the need to remove a Veteran Tree.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Veteran Trees” means those trees within the administrative boundary of Staffordshire County Council and identified in:\r\n·paragraph 8.3.27 of the Community area report for CA1, Fradley to Colton, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement;\r\n·paragraphs 8.3.27 and 8.3.28 of the Community area report for CA2, Colwich to Yarlet, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement;\r\n·paragraph 8.3.28 of the Community area report for CA3, Stone and Swynnerton, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement;\r\n·paragraph 8.3.29 of the Community area report for CA4, Whitmore Heath to Madeley, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement; and\r\n·paragraph 8.3.20 and 8.3.21 of the Community area report for CA5, South Cheshire, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement.","Impact on veteran trees","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 13","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.15","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","14.(a) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to explore during detailed design of the Proposed Scheme and, if reasonably practicable, implement options for alternative traffic management measures which could be carried out within the existing highway boundary on Bishton Lane instead of the Bishton Lane Widening Works in order to seek to avoid or reduce the need for the Bishton Lane Widening Works and the associated permanent loss of approximately 3km of native species-rich hedgerows reported in paragraph 8.4.16 of the Community area report for CA2, Colwich to Yarlet, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement. As part of this the nominated undertaker will have regard to the volume of HS2 traffic proposed to use Bishton Lane during the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Bishton Lane Widening Works” means the widening of a 1.5km section of Bishton Lane to 3.5m in width, with provision of passing bays, from The Hollies to Colwich Bridleway 23, with replacement hedgerow planting on both sides of Bishton Lane as set out in paragraph 2.2.11 of the Community area report for CA2, Colwich to Yarlet, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement\r\n","Widening of Bishton Lane (CA2)","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 14","2018-05-08","Assurance","Bishton Lane, Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.16","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n15. (a) The Promoter will, subject to the conditions in paragraph (b), require the nominated undertaker to undertake an environmental assessment of a construction route for Large Goods Vehicles between the Yarlet South Cutting Satellite Compound and the junction of the A51 and the A518 via the A34 Stone Road and the A51 as shown in green for indicative purposes on the attached plan (the “Additional Construction Route”) to ensure that the use of the route creates no new significant adverse environmental effects.\r\n(b) The assurance in paragraph (a) is subject to:\r\ni.  the Promoter being satisfied that the Additional Construction Route is deliverable within the existing powers of the Bill and without the need for any additional land from that identified on the deposited plans as within the limits of land to be acquired or used for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme;\r\nii.  the Additional Construction Route not requiring the protection of other assets and being capable of being used for Large Goods Vehicles or the condition of the highway not unreasonably deteriorating as a result of its use as an Additional Construction Route; and\r\niii.  the carrying out of a satisfactory environmental impact assessment of the effects of the Additional Construction Route and the inclusion of the Additional Construction Route in a Supplementary Environmental Statement to accompany the Bill\r\niv.  the approval of the route by the relevant planning authority under Schedule 17 as a lorry route, as required.","Additional construction traffic route to reduce the impact upon Beaconside","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 15","2018-05-08","Assurance","Beaconside, Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.17","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","16.The Promoter will (subject to any necessary consents or approvals being in place) require the nominated undertaker to ensure that, upon the opening of the Haul Road to HS2 construction traffic, it will use reasonable endeavours to maximise the use of the Haul Road by HS2 LGV construction traffic so far as reasonably practicable to access the Marston South embankment satellite compound so as to reduce the use of Marston Lane by HS2 LGV construction traffic accessing the Marston South embankment satellite compound. This assurance is subject to the Promoter being satisfied that doing so would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Haul Road” means that site haul route described in the fourth bullet point of paragraph 2.3.94 of the Community area report for CA2, Colwich to Yarlet, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement.\r\n","Marston Lane haul road","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 16","2018-05-08","Assurance","Marston Lane","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.18","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n17. (a) The Promoter will promote an Additional Provision to provide for the following traffic measures to be provided on a permanent basis:\r\n· The introduction of traffic signals at the existing non-signalised intersection of the A513 and Marston Lane;\r\n· Works to widen the Hydrant Way approach to the A513/A518/Hydrant Way roundabout; and\r\n· Signalisation of the existing priority junction of A34 with Yarnfield Lane.\r\n(b) The Promoter will engage with Staffordshire County Council in preparing the Additional Provision to seek to understand highway capacity and safety standards issues.\r\n(c) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to commence implementation of the traffic measures mentioned in paragraph (a) above as soon as reasonably practicable following commencement of main civil engineering works in the construction programme for the Proposed Scheme.\r\n(d) the Promoter will, subject to securing any necessary consents and approvals and, if necessary, any additional works powers to those currently in the Bill by way of the promotion of an Additional Provision, provide for the introduction of temporary traffic signals at the existing non-signalised intersection of the A513 and Sandon Road (east) for the period in which such temporary traffic signals would provide mitigation to reduce the effects of HS2 construction traffic at that junction.\r\n(e) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to notify Staffordshire County Council before making any decision to remove the temporary traffic signals referred to in paragraph (d) above.\r\n(f) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to engage with any developer proposing highways improvements to junctions in the vicinity of Beaconside in respect of which works are proposed as part of the Proposed Scheme (provided that the local highway authority gives the nominated undertaker notice of such proposed developer’s highway improvements) with the aim of securing that the developer coordinates its works with those in the Proposed Scheme.","Junction improvements","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 17","2018-05-08","Assurance","· The intersection of the A513 and Marston Lane;\r\n·  Hydrant Way approach to the A513/A518/Hydrant Way roundabout; and\r\n· Priority junction of A34 with Yarnfield Lane.","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.19","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","19. (a) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, after the relevant main civil engineering works contract which includes the Great Haywood Viaduct has been awarded and commenced (and is free from any legal challenge), to use reasonable endeavours to promptly commence the process for designing the Great Haywood Viaduct.\r\n(b) As a key design element, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to engage the public on the design development of the Great Haywood Viaduct as set out in Information Paper D1: Design.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Great Haywood Viaduct” means that part of Work No. 17 on viaduct over the Macclesfield to Colwich Line and the River Trent as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-24 of the plans deposited with the Bill","Great Haywood viaduct","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 19","2018-05-08","Assurance","Great Haywood Viaduct","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.20","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n20. Following Royal Assent of the Bill, the Promoter will extend the Ecology Review Group, comprised of relevant statutory bodies, non-governmental organisations and local authorities, to cover the Proposed Scheme. The Group reviews the outputs of monitoring for habitat creation sites in respect of the Proposed Scheme and makes recommendations for remedial action where appropriate. The Ecology Review Group may, for the avoidance of doubt, be combined with such a group established for HS2 Phase One.\r\n","Ecology Review Group","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 20","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.21","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n21.The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to work with Staffordshire County Council to identify potential opportunities for environmental enhancements by the nominated undertaker, the council and others in their area as part of the environmental corridor that will be developed as part of the Proposed Scheme as set out in the Environmental Statement and in Information Paper E28: Green Infrastructure and the Green Corridor. The nominated undertaker with give attention to potential improvements to the Stone Meadows Local Nature Reserve, as part of this work","Green Infrastructure and the Green Corridor","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 21","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.22","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","22. (a) Recognising Staffordshire County Council’s request for Common Lane to not be permanently stopped up and subject to the satisfaction of the condition in paragraph (b), the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to design and construct a permanent alternative vehicular route between Common Lane and A515 Lichfield Road to the north of the Proposed Scheme to replace that part of Common Lane which is to be permanently stopped up under the Bill between points P6 and P7 on Sheet No. 1-05 of the plans deposited with the Bill (“the Alternative Route”).\r\n(b) The assurance in paragraph (a) is subject to the successful promotion of an amendment to the Bill through the introduction of an Additional Provision, and any requisite environmental information, which confers on the Secretary of State the land and works powers to acquire compulsorily the additional land required for the provision of the Alternative Route and to construct the Alternative Route.\r\n(c) The Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to promote the Additional Provision referred to in paragraph (b).","Common Lane","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 22","2018-05-08","Assurance","Common Lane and the A515 Lichfield Road, Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.23","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","23 (a) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to require its suppliers to seek to create or promote apprenticeship and employment opportunities for local, disadvantaged and under-represented groups in the construction of the Proposed Scheme, in order to promote fair and equal access to the employment opportunities generated by the Proposed Scheme. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to, insofar as it is lawful to do so, ensure equality of opportunity in order to encourage the recruitment of local, disadvantaged or under-represented groups in the construction of the Proposed Scheme. This is in accordance with the HS2 Ltd Sustainability Policy, which commits to “providing rewarding jobs and careers that are open to all in society, setting new standards for equality, diversity and inclusion and providing a legacy of skills, learning, expertise and experience.”\r\n(b) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to report, prior to commencement of the main civil engineering contract, to Lichfield District Council and Staffordshire County Council on the steps it has taken under paragraph (a).\r\n","Socio economic","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 23","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.24","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","24.The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, in making predictions of noise and vibration in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances for the purpose of HS2 Phase 2a Information Papers E9 Control of Airborne Noise, E10 Control of Ground-borne Noise and Vibration from the Operation of Temporary and Permanent Railways, and E11 Control of Noise from the Operation of Stationary Systems, to include, but not limit such predictions to, the following: the potential for freight operation; planned operational speeds; high speed train noise and vibration characteristics; planned operational rail traffic volumes and compositions; degradation to rolling stock and/or track over the maintenance cycle of the railway; and prediction model uncertainty.\r\n","Noise and vibration","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 24\r\n","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.25","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","25. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to use noise or vibration prediction models during the design and construction phases of the Proposed Scheme that are validated for the range of circumstances over which they are applied. Validation reports for the prediction models used shall be provided to all Local Authority Environmental Health Departments with a declaration of the numerical values of prediction model uncertainty being applied by the nominated undertaker under paragraph 24 above.\r\n","Noise and vibration ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 25","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.26","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","26. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to apply the noise and vibration commitments set out in HS2 Phase 2a Information Papers E9 Control of Airborne Noise, E10 Control of Ground-borne Noise and Vibration from the Operation of Temporary and Permanent Railways, E11 Control of Noise from the Operation of Stationary Systems and E13 Control of Construction Noise and Vibration to individual noise sensitive receptors.\r\n","Noise and vibration","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 26","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.27","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n27.The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to share with the Local Authority Environmental Health Departments information that is relevant to understanding the noise and vibration performance of the control measures adopted during the design of the Proposed Scheme for receptors within their administrative area.\r\n","Noise and vibration","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 27","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.28","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","28. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to apply the November 2015 release of Government's Transport Analysis Guidance Unit A3 when valuing the effect of noise change and consider this value when assessing the benefit of applying operational airborne noise control measures to the Proposed Scheme.","Noise and vibration","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 28","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.29","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n29. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to monitor peer-reviewed research by independent sources into annoyance and health effects specific to high speed railway noise and vibration and notify all Local Authority Environmental Health Departments on the HS2 Phase One route if a numerical correction to noise and vibration levels from the scheme is applied, to account for the research findings.\r\n","Noise and vibration","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 29","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.30","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","30. The Promoter will bring forward an amendment to Schedule 17 to the Bill which would provide for the nominated undertaker to elect to end an approval of lorry routes obtained under Schedule 17. This approach would allow the nominated undertaker to write to the relevant planning authority when it wished to end an approval of lorry routes for a specific site. After this point the nominated undertaker would not be limited to using the routes that had been approved but if it wished to have more than 24 lorry movements from that specific site in a day it would need a new lorry route approval under Schedule 17. The relevant obligations in the Code of Construction Practice and Routewide Traffic Management Plan would still apply.","Amendment to Schedule 17 ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 30","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","East Staffordshire"]
["C9.31","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","31. Where a site is in regular use by Large Goods Vehicles and the site is not subject to an approval under paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill where reasonably practicable routes to and from the site will be discussed at the relevant local Traffic Liaison Group so that any appropriate advice can be provided to the relevant contractor(s) prior to use of that route.”\r\nIn this assurance: “site” means:\r\n(a) a working or storage site,\r\n(b) a site where anything transported to the site will be re-used, or\r\n(c) a waste disposal site.","Discussion about LGV routes with Traffic Liaison Groups\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 31","2018-05-08","Assurance","Staffordshire","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.32","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","32. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to retain the veteran oak tree colloquially known as \"Noddy's Oak\" on Newlands Lane, Stockwell Heath during construction of the works related to the Proposed Scheme in the area. With regards to Natural England and Forestry Commission standing advice on ancient woodland and veteran trees, and taking account of paragraph 12.2 of the draft Code of Construction Practice particularly in relation to root protection zones, the nominated undertaker will further use reasonable endeavours to ensure that the tree’s roots are not damaged during the works to utilities in that area.\r\n","Retaining Noddy's Oak","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Annex A, assurance 31","2018-05-08","Assurance","Noddy's Oak, Staffordshire","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.33","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to raise the issue of the speed limit on Manor Road with Staffordshire County Council, in their capacity as highway authority, in the relevant Traffic Liaison Group (TLG) meeting.","Speed limit on Manor Road, Staffordshire","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's First Special Report of Session 2017-2019, paragraph 22","2018-06-25","Assurance","Manor Road, Staffordshire","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.34","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","The Promoter will continue to liaise with Staffordshire County Council on highway matters and that will include discussions about improving access through Ingestre during HS2 Phase 2A construction works.  \r\n","Access through Ingestre","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's Second Special Report of Session 2017-2019, paragraph 116","2018-11-13","Assurance","Ingestre","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.35","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport\r\n\r\n","Various","Undertaking between the Secreatary of State for Transport and Staffordshire County Council ","2018-12-04","Undertaking","Rugeley Power Station, Staffordshire","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.36","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, in exercising the powers of the Bill, not to remove the Veteran Beech tree referred to as CA2-08 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report. \r\n","Ancient and Veteran Trees ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Sharpe Pritchard LLP assurance 1","2019-02-22","Assurance","The Veteran Beech tree referred to as CA2-08 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report. \r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.37","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","2. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, in exercising the powers of the Bill, not to remove the Veteran Ash tree referred to as CA4-07 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report.\r\n","Ancient and Veteran Trees ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Sharpe Pritchard LLP assurance 2","2019-02-22","Assurance","The veteran Ash Tree referred to as CA4-07 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.38","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, in exercising the powers of the Bill to carry out works which the Environmental Statement reports might result in the loss of any Veteran Tree, to explore and, where reasonably practicable, implement options to avoid removal of the Black Poplar tree referred to as CA1-02 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report.\r\n","Ancient and Veteran Trees ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Sharpe Pritchard LLP assurance 1","2019-02-22","Assurance","The Black Poplar tree referred to as CA-02 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.39","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","2.\tThe Promoter will require the nominated undertake, in exercising the powers of the Bill to carry out works which the Environmental Statement reports might result in the loss of any Veteran Tree, to explore and, where reasonably practicable, implement options to avoid removal of the Horse-Chestnut tree referred to as CA2-03 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report.\r\n","Ancient and Veteran Trees ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Sharpe Pritchard LLP assurance 2","2019-02-22","Assurance","The Horse-Chestnut tree referred to as CA2-03 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report.\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.40","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","3.\tThe Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, in exercising the powers of the Bill, not to remove the Veteran Ash tree referred to as CA3-01 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report.\r\n","Ancient and Veteran Trees ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Sharpe Pritchard LLP assurance 3","2019-02-22","Assurance","The Veteran Ash tree referred to as CA3-01 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report.\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.41","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","4.\tSubject to the Promoter no longer needing to undertake works to the west of the A53 Newcastle Road in the vicinity of Whitmore Heath (south) Tunnelling Facility, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, in exercising the powers of the Bill, not to remove the Pedunculate Oak trees referred to as CA4-02, CA4-03, CA4-04 and CA4-05 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report.\r\n","Ancient and Veteran Trees ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Sharpe Pritchard LLP assurance 4","2019-02-22","Assurance","The Pedunculate Oak trees referred to as CA4-02, CA4-03, CA4-04 and CA4-05 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report.\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.42","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","5.\tThe Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, in exercising the powers of the Bill, not to remove the Pedunculate Oak tree referred to as CA4-08 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report.\r\n","Ancient and Veteran Trees ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Sharpe Pritchard LLP assurance 5","2019-02-22","Assurance","The Pedunculate oak tree referred to as CA4-08 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.43","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","6.\tThe Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, in exercising the powers of the Bill, not to remove the Pedunculate oak tree referred to as CA4-09 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report.\r\n","Ancient and Veteran Trees ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Sharpe Pritchard LLP assurance 6","2019-02-22","Assurance","The Pedunculate oak tree referred to as CA4-09 in the Ancient and Veteran Trees (EI-626) Report","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.44","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n1.1\tSubject to the conditions in 1.2 being satisfied, the Secretary of State will fund the reasonable and properly incurred costs of Staffordshire County Council of undertaking the Flood Mitigation Works. The funding referred to in this paragraph is capped at £30,000 and shall be payable only where the construction of the Flood Mitigation Works has been completed by 31 December 2025. \r\n 1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are:\r\n 1.2.1\tthat Staffordshire County Council agrees and is able \t\tto undertake the Flood Mitigation Works using its powers as \tLocal Highway Authority; and\r\n1.2.2\tthat Staffordshire County Council and the Promoter agree \tthe scope and timetable for the Flood Mitigation Works.\"\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Flood Mitigation Works” means the installation of drainage enhancements at the points shown in \"Appendix 1 - Nethertown flood mitigation\" which may include the clearance and expansion of ditches and culverts and the imposition of traffic management measures.\r\n","Flood Mitigation Works ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, Sharpe Pritchard LLP ","2019-03-15","Assurance","At the points shown in \"Appendix 1 - Nethertown flood mitigation\"","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.45","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","1.1     The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to avoid the use of the B5234 as it passes through Newborough as a Large Goods Vehicle route in connection with the Overhead Line Works during the weekday hours of 08:15 and 09:30 and 15:00 and 16:30 during school term time where reasonably practicable, except:\r\n1.1.1 in circumstances where it is required to do so by the relevant planning authority under the powers conferred on it by paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n1.1.2 in circumstances where it would not be reasonably practicable to use other access routes, for example (but not limited to) in respect of any utilities works proposed within Newborough as part of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n1.1.3 in the case of an emergency or if directed to do so by the police or emergency services.”\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Large Goods Vehicle“ has the same meaning as in paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n “the Overhead Line Works” means the main civil works for the construction of the overhead lines at Parkgate as part of the Proposed Scheme as set out in Schedule 3 to the Bill, shown indicatively on Plans 1-15 - 1-15G.\r\n\r\n","Use of Large Goods Vehicles ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP)","2019-04-16","Assurance","The B5234 as it passes through Newborough and the B5017 as it passes through Shobnall","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.46","N/A","HoC/0130","Staffordshire County Council","1.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to avoid the use of the B5234 as it passes through Newborough and the B5017 as it passes through Shobnall, as a Large Goods Vehicle route in connection with the Overhead Line Works during the weekday hours of 08:15 and 09:30 and 15:00 and 16:40 during school term time, except:\r\n1.1.1 in circumstances where it is required to do so by the relevant planning authority under the powers conferred on it by paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n1.1.2 in circumstances where it would not be reasonably practicable to use other access routes, for example (but not limited to) in respect of any utilities works proposed within Newborough or Shobnall as part of the Proposed Scheme and where it is essential for Large Goods Vehicles to pass through Newborough or Shobnall between those times; and\r\n1.1.3 in the case of an emergency or if directed to do so by the police or emergency services.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Large Goods Vehicle“ has the same meaning as in paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n“the Overhead Line Works” means the main civil works for the construction of the overhead lines at Parkgate as part of the Proposed Scheme as set out in Schedule 3 to the Bill, shown indicatively on Plans 1-15 - 1-15G.","Use of Large Goods Vehicles, Newborough and Shobnall","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP) ","2019-04-25","Assurance","The B5234 as it passes through Newborough","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.47","N/A","AP2/0070","Staffordshire County Council","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to avoid the use of the roads shown coloured orange and blue on the attached plan in Lichfield as a Large Goods Vehicle route for main civil works, except: \r\n2.1.1\tin circumstances where it is required to do so by the relevant planning authority under the powers conferred on it by paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill, or \r\n2.1.2\tin circumstances where it would not be reasonably practicable to use other access routes, for example (but not limited to) in respect of any utilities works proposed within the city of Lichfield as part of the Proposed Scheme, or \r\n2.1.3\tin the case of an emergency or if directed to do so by the police or emergency services.\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n “the Construction Period” means the period from commencement of any works for construction and delivery of the Proposed Scheme until completion of those works;\r\n “Large Goods Vehicle” has the same meaning as in Part 4 of the Road Traffic Act 1988.\r\n\r\n","Construction traffic in Lichfield","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), assurance 2 ","2019-04-29","Assurance","the use of the roads shown coloured orange and blue on the attached plan in Lichfield","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.48","N/A","AP2/0070","Staffordshire County Council","3.1 The Secretary of State will, subject to the conditions in paragraph 3.2, require the nominated undertaker to construct the Overbridge Replacement as soon as reasonably practicable during the Construction Period and, once constructed, will require the nominated undertaker as far as reasonably practicable to segregate public traffic from construction traffic during the remainder of the Construction Period at this location (including but not limited to the period when the Transfer node associated with Yarnfield North embankment satellite compound is in operation), except in the case of an emergency or if directed to do otherwise by the police or emergency services.\r\n3.2. \tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 3.1 are that: \r\n3.2.1.       the Bill confers all necessary powers and consents required in order to deliver the early Overbridge Replacement; and\r\n3.2.2. \tthe early Overbridge Replacement would not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement with the Bill.”\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n “the Construction Period” means the period from commencement of any works for construction and delivery of the Proposed Scheme until completion of those works;\r\n“the Overbridge Replacement” means the proposed Yarnfield Lane M6 overbridge replacement as illustrated on plan 1-39 and 1-40 shown as Work No. 69;","Yarnfield Lane/M6 overbridge","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), assurance 3","2019-04-29","Assurance","Yarnfield Lane/M6 overbridge","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.49","N/A","AP2/0070","Staffordshire County Council","1.1 The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to work with the Petitioner, as the Local Highway Authority, to seek to reduce impacts to junctions in the County of Staffordshire caused by the Proposed Scheme during the Construction Period so far as reasonably practicable (including those junctions which are, according to the Environmental Statement, already over capacity or which will be over capacity as a result of the HS2 Phase 2a works and any of the junctions listed in paragraph 2 of this assurance which are identified, by the traffic assessments referred to in that paragraph, as already over capacity or which will be over capacity as a result of the said works). \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Construction Period” means the period from commencement of any works for construction and delivery of the Proposed Scheme until completion of those works;\r\n“the Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement deposited with the Bill and any further environmental statements or supplementary environmental statements deposited in Parliament in connection with the Bill;\r\n“the Petitioner” means the Staffordshire County Council; \r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n\r\n","Impact on Junctions","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, (Sharpe Pritchard LLP) , assurance 1","2019-05-01","Assurance","A513 Beaconside/Paton Drive; A513 Beaconside/Dyson Way;  A513 Beaconside/MOD;A513 Beaconside/Tollgate Drive;  A513 Beaconside/Parkside Avenue & New Development Accesses; A34 / Redhill Business Park; and A53 / Bent Lane / Three Mile Lane.","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.50","N/A","AP2/0070","Staffordshire County Council","2. The nominated undertaker will carry out traffic assessments for the following junctions which have been identified by the Council as requiring assessment in response to consultations preceding the date on which the Council deposited its petition in respect of Additional Provision 2 to the Bill: \r\n2.1. A513 Beaconside/Paton Drive; \r\n2.2. A513 Beaconside/Dyson Way; \r\n2.3. A513 Beaconside/MOD; \r\n2.4. A513 Beaconside/Tollgate Drive; \r\n2.5. A513 Beaconside/Parkside Avenue & New Development Accesses; \r\n2.6. A34 / Redhill Business Park; and \r\n2.7. A53 / Bent Lane / Three Mile Lane.","Impact on Junctions","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), assurance 2","2019-05-01","Assurance","A513 Beaconside/Paton Drive; A513 Beaconside/Dyson Way;  A513 Beaconside/MOD;A513 Beaconside/Tollgate Drive;  A513 Beaconside/Parkside Avenue & New Development Accesses; A34 / Redhill Business Park; and A53 / Bent Lane / Three Mile Lane.","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.51","N/A","AP2/0070","Staffordshire County Council","\r\n1.1 The Secretary of State acknowledges that Option 7 and Option 7a each have potential to reduce the impacts of the Proposed Scheme during construction while delivering similar benefits during operation. The Secretary of State will therefore require the nominated undertaker to seek to implement either Option 7 or Option 7a substantially in accordance with the alignments as shown indicatively on Plan 1 and Plan 2 respectively. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to begin the process of so implementing either Option 7 or Option 7a as soon as practicable after the date on which the House of Commons Select Committee reports the Bill.\r\n \r\n1.2 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to seek to:\r\n \r\n1.2.1 open any new Option 7 or Option 7a permanent alignment to the public before stopping up the existing Common Lane; and\r\n \r\n1.2.2 implement either Option 7 or Option 7a instead of implementing Work No. 7D.\r\n \r\n1.3 The assurances given in this paragraph 1 are subject to:\r\n \r\n1.3.1 the nominated undertaker obtaining all the necessary consents, including any consent or agreement required under the Highways Act 1980 and planning permission, required to implement either Option 7 or Option 7a, with any conditions placed on the nominated undertaker able to be reasonably capable of implementation;\r\n \r\n1.3.2 in the case of Option 7, the nominated undertaker identifying a suitable alternative site, which can be used for relocation of the mitigation planting in the vicinity of the proposed new roundabout at the junction of the A515 Lichfield Road/A513 Rugeley Road;\r\n \r\n1.3.3 the nominated undertaker being able to secure the necessary rights to the Property on reasonable terms; \r\n\r\n1.3.4 the nominated undertaker concluding that either Option 7 or Option 7a can be delivered without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n \r\n1.3.5 the nominated undertaker, during detailed design, not being prevented from constructing an alternative bridleway link between Common Lane and Work No. 7B, which would otherwise connect with Work No. 7D; and\r\n\r\nand that they do not require the Secretary of State to promote an Additional Provision, or to seek any other powers of compulsory acquisition, in relation to Option 7 or Option 7a.\r\n \r\n1.4 Subject to Paragraph 2, should the conditions in paragraph 1.3 not be met, the nominated undertaker will construct the proposals as authorised by the Bill (namely Work No. 7D).\r\n \r\n1.5 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage regularly with the Council in developing the implementation of either Option 7 or Option 7a.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n\r\n“the Council” means Staffordshire County Council;\r\n  \r\n“Option 7” means the proposal being considered by the nominated undertaker for an alternative solution to seek to address issues at Common Lane as a result of the Proposed Scheme involving the construction of a new permanent road linking the A515 Lichfield Road to Crawley Lane on the alignment shown indicatively on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“Option 7a” means the proposal being considered by the nominated undertaker for an alternative solution to seek to address issues at Common Lane as a result of the Proposed Scheme involving the construction of a new permanent road linking the A515 Lichfield Road to Crawley Lane on the alignment shown indicatively on Plan 2;\r\n \r\n“the Property” means the land required for the construction, operation and maintenance of Option 7 as indicatively shown outlined in purple on Plan 1 or Option 7a as indicatively shown outlined in purple on Plan 2;\r\n \r\n“Plan 1” and Plan 2” means the plans attached to this assurance [attached to letter to beneficiary];\r\n \r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n  \r\n“Work No. 7D” means a diversion of Common Lane commencing at a point 480 metres east of the bridge carrying the A515 Lichfield Road over Bourne Brook and terminating by a junction with Work No. 7 at a point 370 metres south-west of the junction of the A513 Rugeley Road with the A515 Lichfield Road. Work No. 7D includes a bridge over Bourne Brook as described at Schedule 1 to the Bill and proposed in Additional Provision 2; and\r\n \r\n“Work No. 7B” means an access road commencing at a point 380 metres northeast of the junction of Shaw Lane with the A515 Lichfield Road and terminating at a point 85 metres north-east of its commencement as described at Schedule 1 to the Bill.\r\n","Option 7 and Option 7a Development","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, (Sharpe Pritchard LLP, assurance 1","2019-06-24","Assurance","A513 Beaconside/Paton Drive; A513 Beaconside/Dyson Way;  A513 Beaconside/MOD;A513 Beaconside/Tollgate Drive;  A513 Beaconside/Parkside Avenue & New Development Accesses; A34 / Redhill Business Park; and A53 / Bent Lane / Three Mile Lane.","Stafford Borough"]
["C9.52","N/A","AP2/0070","Staffordshire County Council","2.1 In the event that the nominated undertaker is unable to secure the Property by agreement in accordance with paragraph 1.3.3 but the other conditions in paragraph 1.3 are met, the assurances in paragraph 1 shall still apply if the Council secures compulsory powers over the Property so as to enable the acquisition of the Property and the implementation by the nominated undertaker of either Option 7 or Option 7a.\r\n\r\n2.2 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to fund the reasonable costs of the Council in securing the compulsory powers referred to in paragraph 2.1, provided that:\r\n\t\r\n2.2.1 the Council does not take any steps to either secure the requisite compulsory powers or to contest any third party challenge to such powers without the prior consent in writing of the nominated undertaker (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld); and\r\n\r\n2.2.2 the nominated undertaker has prior approval of the Council’s expenditure associated with obtaining the compulsory powers and that all costs claimed by the Council are supported by such evidence as the nominated undertaker reasonably requires.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n\r\n“the Council” means Staffordshire County Council;\r\n  \r\n“Option 7” means the proposal being considered by the nominated undertaker for an alternative solution to seek to address issues at Common Lane as a result of the Proposed Scheme involving the construction of a new permanent road linking the A515 Lichfield Road to Crawley Lane on the alignment shown indicatively on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“Option 7a” means the proposal being considered by the nominated undertaker for an alternative solution to seek to address issues at Common Lane as a result of the Proposed Scheme involving the construction of a new permanent road linking the A515 Lichfield Road to Crawley Lane on the alignment shown indicatively on Plan 2;\r\n \r\n“the Property” means the land required for the construction, operation and maintenance of Option 7 as indicatively shown outlined in purple on Plan 1 or Option 7a as indicatively shown outlined in purple on Plan 2. ","Compulsory Purchase Order","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), assurance 2","2019-06-24","Assurance","A513 Beaconside/Paton Drive; A513 Beaconside/Dyson Way;  A513 Beaconside/MOD;A513 Beaconside/Tollgate Drive;  A513 Beaconside/Parkside Avenue & New Development Accesses; A34 / Redhill Business Park; and A53 / Bent Lane / Three Mile Lane.","Stafford Borough"]
["C10","Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council ","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C10.1","N/A","HoC/0110","Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in exercising the powers under the Bill not to prevent vehicular access to Ingestre from Hoo Mill crossroads via Ingestre Park Road in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances.","Vehicular access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Andrews (Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council)","2018-05-11","Assurance","Access to Ingestre from Hoo Mill crossroads via Ingestre Park Road","Stafford Borough"]
["C10.2","N/A","HoC/0110","Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council","1.1 During the construction of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking account of the relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.2 below, to seek to utilise any Relevant Site Haul Roads as a construction route for Large Goods Vehicles and Construction Vehicles between the public road network and the Compound for the purposes of mitigating the nominated undertaker’s expected frequency and/or period of use of Hanyards Lane as a  construction route for Large Goods Vehicles and Construction Vehicles between the public road network and the Compound.\r\n1.2  The relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.2 above are:-\r\n1.2.1 compliance with all relevant approvals, permissions, undertakings and assurances regarding the operation and use of any Relevant Site Haul Roads; and\r\n1.2.2 the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2A of HS2 as defined further in the Bill, and includes the proposals in Additional Provision 2 to the Bill;\r\n“Relevant Site Haul Roads” means such site haul roads as may be constructed for the Proposed Scheme within the area of the land required for the construction of the railway which may be utilised by the Nominated Undertaker to provide a vehicular construction route between the public road network and the Compound; \r\n“the Compound” means the Brancote South Cutting Satellite Compound as authorised by the Bill the indicative location of which is shown on CT-05-214 in Environmental Statement Volume 2: Map Book, CA2: Colwich to Yarlet as deposited with the Bill; and\r\n“Hanyards Lane” means that part of the private road known as Hanyards Lane in the Parish of Tixall, Staffordshire which is situated within plot 48a and Plot 48 on Sheet No. 1-29 and Sheet No. 1-28 of the deposited plans (as defined in the Bill).\r\n","Use of Hanyards Lane","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Andrews (Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council), assurance 1","2019-03-29","Assurance","Such site haul roads as may be constructed for the Proposed Scheme within the area of the land required for the construction of the railway which may be utilised by the Nominated Undertaker to provide a vehicular construction route between the public road network and the Brancote South Cutting Satellite Compound \r\n\r\nand\r\n\r\nthat part of the private road known as Hanyards Lane in the Parish of Tixall, Staffordshire which is situated within plot 48a and Plot 48 on Sheet No. 1-29 and Sheet No. 1-28 of the deposited plans (as defined in the Bill). ","Stafford Borough"]
["C10.3","N/A","HoC/0110","Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council","2.1   Recognising that Ingestre and Tixall Parish Council would like the temporary roundabout proposed in the Bill at Hoo Mill Lane and shown on Map Number CT-05-212 in the CA2 Colwich to Yarlet Mapbook, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement (“the Temporary Roundabout”) to be made permanent, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to design and construct the works to provide the Temporary Roundabout in a manner that does not preclude this subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 2.2. \r\n2.2 The conditions in paragraph 2.1 are:\r\ni. the nominated undertaker being satisfied that the permanent retention of the Temporary Roundabout can be delivered without the need for any additional land to that included within the limits of land to be acquired or used in the Bill; and \r\nii. Staffordshire County Council securing the necessary consents and approvals to enable the permanent retention and adoption of the Temporary Roundabout under relevant legislation prior to the Temporary Roundabout being removed by the nominated undertaker.\r\n","Hoo Mill roundabout ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Andrews (Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council), assurance 2","2019-03-29","Assurance","The temporary roundabout proposed in the Bill at Hoo Mill Lane and shown on Map Number CT-05-212 in the CA2 Colwich to Yarlet Mapbook","Stafford Borough"]
["C10.5","N/A","HoC/0110","Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council","1. If the relevant highway authority does not retain the Temporary Roundabout permanently, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with Staffordshire County Council during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme in relation to the improvement of the visibility splays at the junction. \r\n2.  Subject to any proposals meeting the conditions in paragraph 3 below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to implement any reasonable proposals put forward from the engagement with Staffordshire County Council to improve the visibility splays at the junction. \r\n3. The conditions referred to in paragraph 2 above are:\r\na. that the proposals can be implemented within the powers or limits of the Bill;\r\nb. the proposals do not give rise to any new or different environmental effects to those assessed in the Environmental Statement or effect compliance with the Environmental Minimum Requirements; and\r\nc. the proposals can be implemented within the construction programme for the Proposed Scheme and do not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n- the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2.","Visibility Splays \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Andrews (Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council), assurance 1 to 3","2019-05-07","Assurance","the cross road of Hoo Mill lane, Ingestre Park Road, Great Haywood Road, Mill Lane\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C10.4","N/A","HoC/0110","Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council","1.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 2 below being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to provide the Footway as part of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n 2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are:\r\n a.\tthat the provisions contained in Additional Provision 2 relating to Ingestre Park Golf Course receive Royal Assent and are implemented as part of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n b.\tthat the Footway can be constructed and retained within the powers and limits of the Bill; \r\nc.\tthat  Staffordshire County Council agree to the Footway being provided; \r\n d.\tthat the Footway does not give rise to any new or different environmental effects to those assessed in the Environmental Statement or effect compliance with the Environmental Minimum Requirements; and\r\n e.\tthat the Footway can be constructed within the construction programme for the Proposed Scheme and does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n “the Footway” means a pedestrian footway to be provided along the part of Ingestre Park Road shown edged black on the plan attached to this assurance.","BOAT 1/Ingestre Park Road Footway ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Andrews (Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council), assurances 1 to 2","2019-05-10","Assurance","means a pedestrian footway to be provided along the part of Ingestre Park Road shown edged black on the plan attached to this assurance","Stafford Borough"]
["C10.6","N/A","HoC/0110","Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council","1.1.\tSubject to the conditions at paragraph 1.2, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to provide a contribution of up to £106,000 towards the construction of the Staffordshire and Worchester Canal Towpath Improvements (‘contribution’). \r\n1.2.\tThe conditions referred to at paragraph 1.1 are:\r\n1.2.1.\t all required consents or approvals required for the Wider Staffordshire and Worchester Canal Towpath Improvements are obtained by Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council or, as the case may be, other relevant stakeholders (for the avoidance of doubt, the nominated undertaker is not required to obtain such consents);\r\n1.2.2.\t other stakeholders provide the remaining funds required for the Wider Staffordshire and Worchester Canal Towpath Improvements;\r\n1.2.3.\t a requirement that the contribution is applied only to the Staffordshire and Worchester Canal Towpath Improvements and that Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council, or other stakeholder carrying out those works, provides the nominated undertaker with evidence to show its compliance with this requirement upon request; and\r\n1.2.4.\t the Bill receives Royal Assent.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Staffordshire and Worchester Canal Towpath Improvements” means the improvement of the towpath requested by Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council between the points indicatively marked with a green dot on the attached plan; and\r\n“the Wider Staffordshire and Worchester Canal Towpath Improvements” means the wider improvements of the towpath between the points indicatively marked with an orange dot on the attached plan. \r\n","Towpath improvement contribution ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Andrews (Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council), assurance 1","2019-10-23","Assurance","means the improvement of the towpath requested by Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council between the points indicatively marked with a green dot on the attached plan ","Stafford Borough"]
["C10.7","N/A","HoC/0110","Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council","1. The Secretary of State will, subject to the conditions in paragraph 2, require the nominated undertaker, insofar as it is reasonably practicable, during the detailed design to reflect the character of the Millennium Avenue within the design of the realigned Hoo Mill Lane through the planting of oak trees. The location and spacing of the trees will replicate the location and spacing of the trees in the Millennium Avenue and such bronze plaques previously used in the Millennium Avenue as are provided by the Petitioner will be used to label the trees.\r\n2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that the planting of such trees does not:\r\n- 1. create any new or different significant environmental effects than those reported in the Environmental Statement; or\r\n- 2. prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme, and that the planting of such trees satisfies the requirements of the local highway authority\r\n\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement deposited at Parliament with the Bill or the environmental statement deposited at Parliament in relation to the High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands) Bill 2017;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Replacement of trees ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Andrews (Ingestre with Tixall Parish Council), assurance 2","2019-10-23","Assurance","Hoo Mill lane, Great Haywood, ST18 0RG","Stafford Borough"]
["C11","The National Trust","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C11.1","N/A","HoC/0164","The National Trust","1. In recognition of the special qualities of the Trent–Sow Parklands and Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage prior to the completion of the design phase and subject to the terms of the assurances below on a collaborative basis in relation to key principles for the design and appearance of HS2 works in the Trent–Sow Parklands area and Cannock Chase AONB with the following parties:\r\n• Staffordshire County Council\r\n• Stafford Borough Council\r\n• Cannock Chase AONB Unit (or any successor body)\r\n• Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council\r\n• Staffordshire Wildlife Trust\r\n• Natural England\r\n• Historic England\r\n• The Canal & River Trust\r\n• The Landmark Trust\r\n•National Trust\r\n2. To facilitate this collaborative engagement, the nominated undertaker will seek to form as soon as reasonably practicable after the date of this assurance a Trent–Sow Parklands and Cannock Chase AONB HS2 Group (the 'Group') involving the nominated undertaker and the parties listed above.\r\n3. This assurance is subject to the parties listed above and the nominated undertaker agreeing to appropriate Terms of Reference in substantially the form provided to the National Trust on 14th May 2018.\r\n","Trent-Sow Parklands and Cannock Chase AONB HS2 Group","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), assurance 1 to 3","2018-05-14","Assurance","Great Haywood","Stafford Borough"]
["C11.2","N/A","HoC/0164","The National Trust","4. The Secretary of State will consider the reasonableness of additional environmental enhancement measures proposed by the Group under the Terms of Reference that are within the Group's area of remit but outside of Bill limits, and the extent to which they align with the purpose and scope of the Group  and, provided that such proposals do not unreasonably impact on the timely, economic and safe delivery and/or construction of the railway, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to fund reasonable measures that align with the purpose and scope of the Group up to a combined total value of £1.5million.","Additional environmental enhancement measures","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP),  assurance 4","2018-05-14","Assurance","Great Haywood","Stafford Borough"]
["C11.3","N/A","HoC/0164","The National Trust","5. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to fund the reasonable and properly incurred administrative costs of the Group, up to £150,000 in each year (following the date of the Group's first meeting) in which the Group continues to meet in accordance with the agreed Terms of Reference.","Administrative costs of the Group","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), assurance 5","2018-05-14","Assurance","Great Haywood","Stafford Borough"]
["C11.4","N/A","HoC/0164","The National Trust","6. The nominated undertaker will be required to review the mitigation strategy at Great Haywood for the control of operation noise, in order to seek to reduce the operational impacts on heritage assets at Shugborough (namely the Chinese House, the Shepherd’s Monument, Shugborough Hall and the garden areas within which they are situated) and implement any such reasonable measures required for mitigating such effects so far as doing so can be done: \r\n(a) within the existing powers of the Bill and without the need for any additional land from that identified on the deposited plans as within the limits of land to be acquired or used for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme; and \r\n(b) without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic construction and/or operation of the Proposed Scheme.","Review mitigation strategy","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), assurance 6","2018-05-14","Assurance","Great Haywood","Stafford Borough"]
["C11.5","N/A","HoC/0164","The National Trust","7. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, after: \r\n(a) the main civil engineering works contract which includes the Great Haywood Viaduct; or \r\n(b) the relevant enabling works contract relating to those works has been awarded and commenced, whichever is awarded and commenced sooner, (and is free from any legal challenge), to meet the National Trust every two months in order to keep the National Trust updated with construction works in the Great Haywood area.\r\n","Meet with National Trust every 2 months","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), assurance 7","2018-05-14","Assurance","Great Haywood","Stafford Borough"]
["C12","Mavesyn Ridware Parish Council","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C12.1","N/A","HoC/0005","Mavesyn Ridware Parish Council ","Subject to the successful promotion by the Promoter of an additional provision to the Bill to authorise a new HS2 construction road between Common Lane and the HS2 railway corridor, as illustrated on Sheet 1-11 and Sheet 1-12 of the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Additional Provision Plans and Sections (March 2018), the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to restrict Large Goods Vehicle construction traffic generated by the HS2 Phase 2A Proposed Scheme from using B5014 Uttoxeter Road through Hill Ridware and the section of Pipe Lane between Pipe Ridware and the junction of Pipe Lane and the proposed haul road at Common Lane, except:\r\n1.1 in circumstances where it is required to do so by the relevant planning authority under the powers conferred on it by paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill; or\r\n1.2 in circumstances where it would not be reasonably practicable to use another route for utilities works, mitigation works and other minor works; or\r\n1.3 in the case of emergency or if directed to do so by the police or emergency services.\r\n In this assurance:\r\n“Large Goods Vehicle” has the same meaning as in Part 4 of the Road Traffic Act 1988\r\n","Construction traffic through Hill Ridware and Pipe Ridware","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Ms Samantha LaPlanche (Clerk to Mavesyn Ridware Parish Council)","2018-05-16","Assurance","Hill Ridware and Pipe Ridware, Staffordshire","Lichfield District"]
["C13","Henry Chadwick Community Primary School","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C13.1","N/A","HoC/0048","Henry Chadwick Community Primary School","Subject to the successful promotion by the Promoter of an additional provision to the Bill to authorise a new HS2 construction road between Common Lane and the HS2 railway corridor, as illustrated on Sheet 1-11 and Sheet 1-12 of the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Additional Provision Plans and Sections (March 2018), the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to restrict Large Goods Vehicle construction traffic generated by the HS2 Phase 2A Proposed Scheme from using School Lane in Hill Ridware, except:\r\n1.1 in circumstances where it is required to do so by the relevant planning authority under the powers conferred on it by paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill; or\r\n1.2 in circumstances where it would not be reasonably practicable to use another route for utilities works, mitigation works and other minor works; or\r\n1.3 in the case of emergency or if directed to do so by the police or emergency services.\r\n In this assurance:\r\n“Large Goods Vehicle” has the same meaning as in Part 4 of the Road Traffic Act 1988.\r\n","Construction traffic on School Lane, Hill Ridware","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Gillian Margaret Stockdale","2018-05-16","Assurance","School Lane, Hill Ridware","Lichfield District"]
["C14","The Reverend Grigson and Mrs Wray","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C14.1","N/A","HoC/0097","The Reverend Grigson and Mrs Wray","(a) The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to explore and, subject to the conditions in sub-paragraph (b) implement, options for providing, as far as is reasonably practicable, a new temporary parking bay during HS2 construction, sufficient for up to three car parking spaces on Yarlet Lane in the vicinity of the Church of St Leonard, Marston.\r\nb) the conditions are that such options:\r\ni. must be deliverable within the existing powers of the Bill;\r\nii. are subject to consultation and, as necessary approval, of the relevant highway authority in accordance with Schedules 4 and 5 of the Bill; and\r\niii. must not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme\r\nShould the relevant highway authority seek that the works are to be retained as permanent works, the highway authority shall be responsible for all necessary planning permissions and any consents and approvals in accordance with the Highways Act 1980\r\n","Temporary parking bay at Yarlet Lane","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to the Reverend Grigson and Mrs Wray","2018-05-18","Assurance","Yarlet Lane, Marston","Stafford Borough"]
["C14.2","N/A","HoC/0097","The Reverend Grigson and Mrs Wray","1.1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, to continue to seek where reasonably practicable, measures to further reduce or avoid the likely significant airborne noise effect identified in the Environmental Statement. In doing so the nominated undertaker will continue to engage with Saint Leonards Church, Marston (‘the church’) to fully understand the receptor, its use and the benefit of the measures.\r\n","Noise and vibration reduction","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to the Reverend Grigson assurance 1","2018-05-22","Assurance","St Leonards Church","Stafford Borough"]
["C14.3","N/A","HoC/0097","The Reverend Grigson and Mrs Wray","2.1 The Promoter, liaising appropriately with representatives of the church, and subject to being granted all necessary rights of access and being provided with any necessary consents for carrying out monitoring and other activities, shall ensure that, prior to the commencement of the works related to the construction of the Proposed Scheme within the vicinity of the church, a risk assessment (‘the Risk Assessment’) is carried out by a competent specialist of the potential impacts of vibration from the construction of the of the Proposed Scheme on the church and any other items held at the church identified as vulnerable, or sensitive to vibration.\r\n2.2 The Risk Assessment shall take into account, but not be limited to, the structural integrity of the building, the vibration sensitivity of any item identified in the assessment work and work undertaken at the church, the existing vibration in the potentially affected locations, the nature of the construction activities proposed and the intervening ground conditions between the receptor and source of any vibration.\r\n2.3 If the Risk Assessment identifies the potential for harmful effects on the church or any of the vulnerable items held at the church, the Promoter will develop a vibration management plan (‘the Vibration Management Plan’), which is to be implemented to manage the impact of vibration related to the construction of the Proposed Scheme within the vicinity of the church. The Risk Assessment, and Vibration Management Plan if applicable, may include, but not necessarily be limited to, vibration predictions, vibration assessment (including the identification of relevant criteria), identification of control measures to be adopted, and a vibration monitoring regime (including the identification of relevant trigger levels) and associated control mechanisms. The approach to, and conclusions of, the Risk Assessment, and any Vibration Management Plan, will be developed in consultation with the church, or their nominated representatives.\r\n2.4 The Promoter shall implement any Vibration Management Plan produced in accordance with this assurance in order to avoid any adverse impacts from vibration on the church and on any vulnerable items held at the church during the construction of the Proposed Scheme within the church grounds.\r\n2.5 Under any Vibration Management Plan produced in accordance with this assurance, the Promoter shall also implement a monitoring strategy for vibration and noise at the church during the construction works of the Proposed Scheme within the church grounds.","Risk assessment and vibration management plan","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to the Reverend Grigson, assurance 2","2018-05-22","Assurance","St Leonards Church","Stafford Borough"]
["C14.4","N/A","HoC/0097","The Reverend Grigson and Mrs Wray","3.1 The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to explore and, subject to the conditions in sub-paragraph 3.2 implement, as far as is reasonably practicable, options for providing and installing infrastructure for toilet facilities and clean running water (without a connection to a sewerage system) within the building of the church and maintaining such facilities throughout the period of construction of the Proposed Scheme within the vicinity of the church.\r\n3.2 The conditions in paragraph 3.1 are that such options:\r\n3.2.1 are subject to the church obtaining any necessary consents and approvals, including any faculty; and\r\n3.2.2 must not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme. ","Toilets and refreshment facilities","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to the Reverend Grigson and Mrs Wray, assurance 3","2018-05-22","Assurance","St Leonards Church","Stafford Borough"]
["C15","Marson, John","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C15.1","N/A","HoC/0113","John Marson","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in exercising the powers under the Bill not to, as far as is reasonably practicable, restrict vehicular access to and from the Property at any time during construction and operation of the temporary haul route (shown on the maps attached).\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\"Property” means Limpits Farm House, Heath Road, Whitmore, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire ST5 5HB\r\n","Vehicular access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr John Marson","2018-05-18","Assurance","Limpits Farm House, Heath Road, Whitmore, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire ST5 5HB","Stafford Borough"]
["C16","Woore Parish Council","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/a",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C16.1","N/A","HoC/0134","Woore Parish Council","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker not to use the Pipe Gate ‘slip road’ as a lorry holding area nor seek approval for the use of the route by Large Goods Vehicles under Schedule 17 of the Bill for the purposes of the construction of works authorised under the Bill, except where required by a direction of the relevant highway authority or otherwise in an emergency or at the direction of a police officer or other emergency services.\r\n","Restrict vehicular access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Sarah Pimlott","2018-05-18","Assurance","Pipe Gate slip road","Shropshire"]
["C16.2","N/A","HoC/0134","Woore Parish Council","1.1\tSubject to paragraph 1.2, so as to comply with the recommendation of the House of Commons Select Committee regarding the control of traffic in Woore Village, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to:\r\n1.1.1\tContinue to engage with Woore Parish Council and the local highway authority in relation to the impact of a construction route through Woore Village and to use reasonable endeavours to agree with Woore Parish Council a suitable package of physical traffic calming and safety measures to manage construction traffic within the Village.\r\n1.1.2\tIn the event that agreement under paragraph 1.1.1 is not reached in time to allow the traffic calming measures to be consented and constructed prior to such time that the A51 and A525 are required by the nominated undertaker as construction routes for the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to implement the measures proposed in Design Package 2 in the Traffic Report.\r\n1.2\tParagraph 1.1 is subject to the following:\r\n1.2.1\tthe measures can be carried out without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.2\tthe consent of the local highway authority;\r\n1.2.3\tthe measures do not create any new or different significant environmental effects than those reported in the Environmental Statement prepared in connection with the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“construction route” means an application for, and approval of, a route for Large Goods Vehicles to use the A51 and A525 and which passes through Woore in accordance with Schedule 17 of the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”);\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2A of HS2 as defined further in the Bill, and includes the proposals in Additional Provision 2 to the Bill;\r\n“the Traffic Report” means the Report entitled ‘Traffic Calming and Road Safety Provisions Options – Woore Village’ issued to Woore Parish Council in January 2019 and appended to this assurance.\r\n\"Design Package 2\" as detailed in the report issued in January 2019\r\n","Traffic Calming Measures","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Bernie Morris assurance 1.1 to 1.2.3 ","2020-03-13","Assurance","A51 and A525 which passes through Woore Village","Shropshire"]
["C16.3","N/A","HoC/0134","Woore Parish Council","1.1     Subject to paragraph 1.2, so as to comply with the recommendation of the House of Lords Select Committee regarding the implementation of road safety measures in Woore village, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to:   \r\n1.1.1\tInclude provision for a School Crossing Patrol Officer in the package of measures set out in the assurance given to Woore Parish Council on 13 March 2020; and \r\n1.1.2     In the event that Shropshire  Council (“the Council”), as local highway authority, does not give its approval to the provision of a School Crossing Patrol Officer then the equivalent funding for the School Crossing Patrol Officer would be made available to the Council for other road safety measures that the Council informs the nominated undertaker would be of a greater safety benefit to the village of Woore.\r\n\r\n1.2\tParagraph 1.1 is subject to the following:\r\n1.2.1\tthe provision for the School Crossing Patrol Officer be used only during term time for the period that the A51 and A525 through the parish of Woore are in use as an HS2 construction traffic route;\r\n1.2.2\tthe School Crossing Patrol Officer is deployed only on the crossing situated on London Road outside Woore Primary School;\r\n1.2.3\tany funding for alternative safety measures provided to the Council is no more than the cost of funding the School Crossing Patrol Officer would be for that period;\r\n1.2.4\tthe School Crossing Patrol Officer can be employed, or alternative measures can be carried out, without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n1.2.5\tin relation to paragraph 1.1.1, the consent of the local highway authority.\r\n","Provision of School Crossing Patrol Officer","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Helen Jackson, assurance 1.1 to 1.1.2","2020-11-23","Assurance","A51 and A525 which passes through Woore Village","Shropshire"]
["C17","The Landmark Trust","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C17.1","N/A","HoC/0085","The Landmark Trust","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in exercise of the Bill powers not to restrict pedestrian and vehicular access to Ingestre Pavilion and Tixall Gatehouse, where reasonably practicable during the construction of HS2 works.\r\n","Vehicular and pedestrian access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead (Knight Frank)","2018-05-21","Assurance","Ingestre Pavilion and Tixall Gatehouse","Stafford Borough"]
["C17.2","N/A","AP2/0080","The Landmark Trust","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in exercise of the Bill powers, as they may be altered by Additional Provision 2, to not restrict pedestrian and vehicular access to Ingestre Pavilion and Tixall Gatehouse, so far as reasonably practicable, during construction of the AP2 works.","Vehicular and pedestrian access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead (Knight Frank)","2019-04-15","Assurance","Ingestre Pavilion and Tixall Gatehouse","Stafford Borough"]
["C18","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C18.1","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in exercise of the Bill powers: \r\n(a) not to restrict pedestrians and vehicles from accessing Staffordshire Showground, so far as is reasonably practicable during the construction of HS2 works;","Vehicular and pedestrian access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 1a","2018-05-22","Assurance","Staffordshire Showground, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.2","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in exercise of the Bill powers to:\r\n\r\n(b) engage with Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society to discuss the timing and nature of HS2 works within the Staffordshire Showground site or those works within the immediate vicinity of the Staffordshire Showground site which are anticipated to directly affect vehicular access to the Staffordshire Showground site on event days (provided Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society gives the nominated undertaker reasonable notice of such event days in advance) so as to reduce, so far as is reasonably practicable, disturbance to Staffordshire Showground and its operations;\r\n","Engagement","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 1b","2018-05-22","Assurance","Staffordshire Showground, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.3","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in exercise of the Bill powers:\r\n\r\n(c) should HS2 works on event days (notified to the nominated undertaker) require alternative temporary traffic direction signing to be installed by the nominated undertaker on the adopted highway for pedestrian and vehicular access to and egress from the Staffordshire Showground, to engage with Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society and the local highway authority regarding the provision of such alternative temporary traffic direction signing.\r\n","Signage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 1c","2018-05-22","Assurance","Staffordshire Showground, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.4","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","Other than in unforeseen or emergency circumstances, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in exercise of the Bill powers to use reasonable endeavours not to interrupt pedestrian use of the underpass shown marked on the Plan on Event Days during the construction phase of HS2 Phase 2a.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n‘Event Days’ means the days as notified to HS2 Limited by the Petitioner in writing and no less than 3 months in advance and lasting no longer than 5 days, unless agreed between the Promoter and the Petitioner, where parking is required on the western side of the A518 and the underpass is required for visitors to cross to the Showground for the purposes of the specified event","SABS underpass","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch(Bircham Dyson Bell LLP) assurance 1","2018-06-21","Assurance","The underpass shown marked on the Plan on Event Days during the construction phase of HS2 Phase 2a, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.5","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","1. Subject to 2 below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours not to undertake any mitigation planting on the area occupied by the LPG Tanks or 5 meter buffer area around the LNG Tanks as shown edged red on the Plan within plots 33 and 37 shown on sheet 1-30.\r\n\r\n2. The conditions referred to in 1 above are that this change:\r\n• does not negatively impact the Promoter’s objective of seeking to achieve no net loss in biodiversity;\r\n• does not affect the landscape planting required to mitigate any significant visual effects reported in the Environmental Statement;\r\n• receives the consent of all relevant bodies and authorities;\r\n• does not affect the Promoter’s compliance with any aspects of the Environmental Minimum Requirements; and\r\n• does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of HS2 Phase 2a.","LPG tanks","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP) assurance 2","2018-06-21","Assurance","Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.6","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","1. Subject to 2 below, during the detailed design of HS2 Phase 2a the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner in relation to the design of the reconfigured western access from Weston Road (Work No. 51B) as shown on the Plan to maximise the amount of space for car parking available to Staffordshire County Showground so far as reasonably practicable. \r\n2. Paragraph 1 above is subject to:\r\n• any statutory approvals required from the Local Planning Authority and from the Local Highway Authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill\r\n• changes to the Bill made through any future Additional Provisions not being adversely affected by this assurance;\r\n• the proposal not affecting compliance with any aspect of the Environmental Minimum Requirements by the Promoter;\r\n• the proposal not requiring the acquisition of any land not provided for under the Bill or outside of the Petitioner’s landownership; and\r\n• the proposal not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of HS2 Phase 2a.\r\n","Access off A518 Weston Road","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP) assurance 3","2018-06-21","Assurance","Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.7","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","The Promoter would like to draw the Petitioner’s attention to the provisions included in the draft Code of Construction Practice in relation to engagement and notice of works, in particular section 5.1.4, and in addition is willing to offer the following assurance: \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for construction of the HS2 Phase 2a project in the immediate area.”\r\n","Provision of information","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP) assurance 4 ","2018-06-21","Assurance","Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.8","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","\r\nOther than in unforeseen or emergency circumstances, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in exercise of the Bill powers to use reasonable endeavours not to interrupt pedestrian use of the underpass shown marked on the Plan [attached to beneficiary letter] on Event Days during the construction phase of HS2 Phase 2a.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n‘Event Days’ means the calendar days as notified to HS2 Limited by the Petitioner in writing as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event no less than 3 months in advance and lasting no longer than 5 calendar days in any period of consecutive calendar days, unless agreed between the Promoter and the Petitioner, where parking is required on the western side of the A518 and the underpass is required for visitors to cross to the Showground for the purposes of the specified event\r\n","SBAS underpass","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 1","2018-07-09","Assurance","Staffordshire Showground, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.9","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","1. Subject to 2 below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker not to undertake any mitigation planting on Plot 37 any further north than 5 metres to the south of the LPG Tanks and LNG Tanks on that Plot. \r\n\r\n2. The conditions referred to in 1 above are that this change:\r\n\r\n• does not affect the landscape planting required to mitigate any significant visual effects reported in the Environmental Statement;\r\n• receives the consent of all relevant bodies and authorities;\r\n• does not affect the Promoter’s compliance with any aspects of the Environmental Minimum Requirements; and\r\n• does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of HS2 Phase 2a.\r\n                 ","LPG tanks","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 2","2018-07-09","Assurance","Staffordshire Showground, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.10","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","\r\n1. Subject to 2 below, during the detailed design of HS2 Phase 2a the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner in relation to the design of the reconfigured western access from Weston Road (Work No. 51B) as shown on the Plan [attached to beneficiary letter] to maximise the amount of space for car parking available to Staffordshire County Showground so far as reasonably practicable.\r\n\r\n2. Paragraph 1 above is subject to:\r\n\r\n• any statutory approvals required from the Local Planning Authority and from the Local Highway Authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill\r\n• changes to the Bill made through any future Additional Provisions not being adversely affected by this assurance (notwithstanding the petitioner’s right to be heard on a petition against any such Additional Provision);\r\n• the proposal not affecting compliance with any aspect of the Environmental Minimum Requirements by the Promoter;\r\n• the proposal not requiring the acquisition of any land not provided for under the Bill or outside of the Petitioner’s landownership; and\r\n• the proposal not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of HS2 Phase 2a.\r\n","Access off A518 Weston Road ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 3","2018-07-09","Assurance","Western access from Weston Road (Work No. 51B) as shown on the Plan\r\n\r\nStaffordshire Showground, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.11","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill from time to time and of likely changes to target dates for construction of the HS2 Phase 2a project in the immediate area of the Showground.","Provision of information","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 4","2018-07-09","Assurance","Staffordshire Showground, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.12","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","\r\nIf at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 5","2018-07-09","Assurance","Staffordshire Showground, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.13","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","\r\nThe Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with SBAS, where a business case is approved and where it relates to the provision of additional infrastructure, including reconfiguring the entrance to the Property from Deer Park Drive and associated reconfigured internal roads within the ownership of SBAS, in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Promoter of part of the Property required for the Showground.\r\n \r\nSuch agreement to provide that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Promoter being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the Property in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured.\r\n","Reconfiguring entrance and internal roads","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 6","2018-07-09","Assurance","Staffordshire Showground, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.14","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to engage with the relevant utility companies in order to reduce any disturbance caused by utility works at the Property as far as reasonably practicable.","Utility diversions","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 7","2018-07-09","Assurance","Staffordshire Showground, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.15","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","1. Subject to 2 below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker not to undertake any mitigation planting on Plot 37 any further north than 5 metres to the south of the LPG Tanks on that Plot.\r\n2. The conditions referred to in 1 above are that this change:\r\n∙\tdoes not affect the Promoter’s compliance with any aspects of the Environmental Minimum Requirements; and\r\n∙\tdoes not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of HS2 Phase 2a.\r\n\r\n","LPG tanks","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 1","2018-11-21","Assurance","Plot 37","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.16","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","1.1 The Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition in the Bill over plots AP1-23 and AP1-24 shown on the Parliamentary Plans accompanying Additional Provision 1 to the Bill [plan reference C861-ARP-HY-DPL-000-120015] during the construction phase of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.2 Subject to the successful promotion of an Additional Provision which confers on the Secretary of State the power to use a section of Trent Walk for HS2 maintenance access, the Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition in the Bill over plots AP1-23 and AP1-24 shown on the Parliamentary Plans accompanying Additional Provision 1 to the Bill [plan reference C861-ARP-HY-DPL-000-120015] for maintenance during the operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Plots AP1-23 and AP1-24\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurances 1.1 and 1.2","2018-11-21","Assurance","Plots AP1-23 and AP1-24","Stafford Borough"]
["C18.17","N/A","HoC/0161","Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society","1. Subject to the satisfaction of the condition detailed in paragraph 2 below, in consideration of SBAS agreeing not to pursue any compensation claim in relation to loss of profit or business extinguishment for the reduction of car parking at the Showground as a result of the Authorised Works, the Secretary of State will not exercise powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill over the Land.\r\n2. The condition referred to in paragraph 1 is that any of the Land is within the freehold ownership of SBAS at the date of Royal Assent to the Bill.” \r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“the Land” means the land located with plots AP2-16, AP2-18, AP2-19 and AP2-21 in the Parish of Hopton and Coton as shown on the deposited plans for the Additional Provision to the Bill deposited in the House of Commons on 8 February 2019;\r\n“SBAS” means Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society; \r\n“the Showground” means Staffordshire County Showground, Weston Rd, Stafford ST18 0BD.","Staffordshire County Showground\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurances 1 to 2","2019-04-12","Assurance","Plots AP2-16, AP2-18, AP2-19 and AP2-21 in the Parish of Hopton and Coton \r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C19 ","Bull, Wayne Bull and Julia Allsopp","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C19.1","N/A","HoC/0182 & AP1/0025","Mr Bull and Miss Allsopp","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to restrict HS2 Large Goods Vehicles from using Common Lane between its existing junction with the A515 Lichfield Road and the Petitioner’s property, Holly Cottage, except\r\n• in circumstances where it would not be reasonably practicable to use another route, for example for utilities works, or mitigation works; or\r\n• in circumstances where it is required to do so by the relevant planning authority under the powers conferred on it by paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill; or\r\n• in the case of emergency or if directed to do so by the police or emergency services.","Construction Traffic using Common Lane South","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Bull and Miss Allsopp","2018-05-23","Assurance","Common Lane South, Lichfield Road","Stafford Borough"]
["C19.2","N/A","AP2/0050","Mr Bull and Miss Allsopp","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to restrict HS2 Large Goods Vehicles from using Common Lane between its existing junction with the A515 Lichfield Road and the Petitioner’s property, Holly Cottage in connection with the construction of the Proposed  Scheme, except\r\n• in circumstances where it would not be reasonably practicable to use another route, for example for utilities works, or mitigation works; or\r\n• in circumstances where it is required to do so by the relevant planning authority under the powers conferred on it by paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill; or\r\n• in the case of emergency or if directed to do so by the police or emergency services.\r\nIn this assurance, “Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2A of HS2 as defined further in the Bill, and includes the proposals in Additional Provision 2 to the Bill.","Construction Traffic using Common Lane South","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Bull and Miss Allsopp","2019-03-25","Assurance","Common Lane between its existing junction with the A515 Lichfield Road and Holly Cottage","Stafford Borough"]
["C19.3","N/A","AP2/0050","Mr Bull and Miss Allsopp","\r\nThe Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to restrict HS2 Large Goods Vehicles from using Crawley Lane except\r\n• during the construction of Crawley Lane modifications shown on CT-05-202-R1; or\r\n• in circumstances where it would not be reasonably practicable to use another route, for example for utilities works, or mitigation works; or\r\n• in circumstances where it is required to do so by the relevant planning authority under the powers conferred on it by paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill; or\r\n• in the case of emergency or if directed to do so by the police or emergency services.\r\n","Large Goods Vehicles using Crawley Lane","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Bull and Miss Allsopp","2019-04-01","Assurance","Crawley Lane","Stafford Borough"]
["C19.4","N/A","AP2/0050","Mr Bull and Miss Allsopp","1.1 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below being satisfied, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to locate the Pyford North Embankment Satellite Compound as far away as possible from the Petitioner’s Property within the Construction Area as shown for indicative purposes only on the attached plan. \r\n1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n1.2.1  the Promoter is satisfied that the change can be delivered within the existing powers of the Bill and without the need for any additional land from that identified on the deposited plans as within the limits of land to be acquired or used for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n 1.2.2  the Promoter is satisfied that the change could be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill; \r\n 1.2.3  the contractor is satisfied that the change can be accommodated within the overall Construction Area at this location; and\r\n1.2.4  the Promoter is satisfied that the change will not prejudice the safe, timely and economic construction of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Construction Area” means plot 101 on the attached Bill plan;\r\n “the Petitioner’s Property” means the property shown (Holly Cottage) on the attached plan.","Pyford North Embankment Satellite Compound","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Bull and Miss Allsopp","2019-04-26","Assurance","Holly Cottage","Stafford Borough"]
["C20","Rushton, Andrew","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C20.1","N/A","HoC/0157","Andrew Rushton","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 Seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 Seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed Design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Andrew Rushton, assurance 1","2018-05-25","Assurance","Black Flatts Farm\r\nLichfield, WS15 3HT","Lichfield District"]
["C20.2","N/A","HoC/0157","Andrew Rushton","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural Soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Andrew Rushton, assurance 2","2018-05-25","Assurance","Black Flatts Farm\r\nLichfield, WS15 3HT","Lichfield District"]
["C20.3","N/A","HoC/0157","Andrew Rushton","1.1\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, the Secretary of State will not exercise the powers conferred in the Bill over the Woodland Habitat Creation Land for the purposes of provision of woodland habitat creation on the Woodland Habitat Creation Land but instead shall use the Replacement Land for such purposes. \r\n1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are:\r\n1.2.1\tthe inclusion of the Grid Supply Point Connection in the enacted Bill;\r\n1.2.2\tthe Secretary of State being satisfied that the relocation of the woodland habitat creation to the Replacement Land can be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement;\r\n 1.2.3\tthe nominated undertaker obtaining, at the nominated undertaker’s expense,  all necessary consents and approvals from the local highway/ planning authority required to authorise the use of the Replacement Land for woodland habitat creation and the use of the Access for the purposes of the creation and maintenance of the woodland habitat on the Replacement Land; \r\n1.2.4\tthe Secretary of State being satisfied that the relocation of the woodland habitat creation to the Replacement Land can be made without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.5        the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Replacement Land is suitable for woodland habitat creation following a detailed ecological survey undertaken by the Promoter; \r\n1.2.6\tthe Replacement Land being sufficient to accommodate the woodland habitat creation intended for the Woodland Habitat Creation Land;\r\n1.2.7\tthe Petitioner and owner of the Replacement Land entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n 1.2.7.1\tgrants any and all necessary rights over the Replacement Land sufficient to enable the Secretary of State to use that land to plant the woodland habitat created on the Replacement Land;\r\n1.2.7.2\tprovides that the consideration payable to the Petitioner (and land owner) for using the Replacement Land for woodland habitat creation shall be calculated as if the Secretary of State had done so in the exercise of powers in the Bill; \r\n 1.2.7.3\tprovides for access, or the construction of the Access if that is required, and grants any and all necessary rights over the Access to enable the Secretary of State to create and thereafter maintain the woodland habitat on the Replacement Land; \r\n1.2.7.4\tprovides for the Petitioner’s confirmation that the land required for the Access is not subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the use of the Access for the purposes of the creation and maintenance of the woodland habitat on the Replacement Land;\r\n1.2.7.5\tprovides for the maintenance by the Petitioner of the woodland habitat created on the Replacement Land and to protect that land as woodland habitat in perpetuity;  \r\n1.2.7.6\tprovides for the imposition on the Petitioner of obligations relating to the carrying out, maintenance, protection or enforcement of the woodland habitat or prohibitions on the use of the Replacement Land;\r\n 1.2.7.7\tis binding on all those with interests in the Replacement Land and the land required for the Access and any successors in title. \r\n 1.3\tNothing in this assurance shall prevent the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred in the Bill over the Woodland Habitat Creation Land:\r\n 1.3.1\tfor any other works/purposes permitted by the Bill as enacted;\r\n 1.3.2\tfor the purposes of woodland habitat creation:\r\n1.3.2.1\tin the event that any of the conditions in paragraph 1.2 are not satisfied or\r\n1.3.2.2\tto the extent that the Replacement Land is insufficient to accommodate the woodland habitat creation proposed to be created within the Woodland Habitat Creation Land.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Access” means the creation of an access to the Replacement Land from Blithbury Road and the provision of an access track suitable for use by maintenance vehicle as shown indicatively on Attachment B to allow the creation and future maintenance of the woodland habitat on the Replacement Land; \r\n“Grid Supply Point Connection” means a connection from the national grid supply between Parkgate, on the B5234, 1.5km west of Newborough, and the Newlands Lane Auto Transformer Feeder Station, as illustrated on Sheets 15 – 15 G of the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Additional Provision Plans and Sections dated February 2019;\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017; \r\n“the Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme, including any supplementary environmental statement, accompanying the Bill;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Andrew Rushton of Black Flatts Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n “Replacement Land” means the land within the Petitioner’s ownership which is suitable to be used for woodland habitat creation as shown indicatively edged in blue on Attachment A; and\r\n“Woodland Habitat Creation Land” means that land within plot 118 on Bill Plan 1-14 identified for the provision of woodland habitat creation edged in green on Attachment A.\r\n","Access for creation and purposes of woodland habitat","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Andrew Rushton","2019-08-06","Assurance","Black Flatts Farm\r\nLichfield, WS15 3HT","Lichfield District"]
["C21","Smith, Richard and Colin ","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C21.1","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 Seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 Seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Richard and Colin Smith, assurance 1","2018-05-25","Assurance","Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS13 3QL and Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.2","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3.The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction.  Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n2.5. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.6. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.7 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Richard and Colin Smith, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS13 3QL and Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.3","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Richard and Colin Smith, assurance 3\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS13 3QL and Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.4","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","1.1. The Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with the Petitioner, where a business case is approved and where it relates to the provision of additional farm infrastructure necessary for the Petitioner’s farm business in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Promoter of land required for that business, such agreement to provide that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Promoter being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured.\r\n","Provision of additional infrastructure matters\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Richard and Colin Smith.  Additional Infrastructure, assurance 1\r\n","2018-06-01","Assurance","Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS13 3QL and Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.5","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","2.1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the provision of additional farm infrastructure required as a result of the impact of the project on the holding where the additional infrastructure is either:\r\n2.1.1. to be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or\r\n2.1.2. the subject of a separate application for planning consent.\r\n2.2. The assistance referred to in paragraph 2.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for the provision of additional farm infrastructure.\r\n2.3. Paragraph 2.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 2.1., a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 2.1. and required to give effect to the provision of additional farm infrastructure, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill.\r\n 2.4. Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 2.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper C7: Business Relocation.\r\n2.5. In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.\r\n","Provision of additional farm infrastructure\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Richard and Colin Smith.  Additional Infrastructure, assurance 2 \r\n","2018-06-01","Assurance","Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS13 3QL and Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.6","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 1\r\n","2019-02-13","Assurance","Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS13 3QL and Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.7","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","2.1 The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the relocation of any agricultural buildings displaced for the purposes of the project where the replacement is either:\r\n2.1.1 to be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or\r\n2.1.2  the subject of a separate application for planning consent.\r\n2.2  The assistance referred to in paragraph 2.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for relocation of an agricultural building.\r\n2.3  Paragraph 2.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 2.1., a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 2.1. and required to give effect to the relocation of an agricultural building, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill.\r\n2.4  Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 2.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Information Paper C7, Business Relocation.\r\n2.5  In this assurance, “agricultural building” includes a residential building occupied as part of an agricultural building.\r\n2.6  In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.\r\n","Relocation of agricultural buildings \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 2\r\n","2019-02-13","Assurance","Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS13 3QL and Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.8","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","3.1  If prior to the giving of notice of entry or prior to the notice of vesting under a general vesting declaration to acquire land permanently (whether or not before Royal Assent) the Petitioner identifies suitable land for the relocation of an agricultural building (whether within or outside the Petitioner’s ownership) and the Petitioner provides to the Secretary of State a detailed course of action substantiating the relocation, the Secretary of State will confirm whether or not he accepts that the land identified and evidence supporting the course of action provides a reasonable basis for the Petitioner’s claim for compensation in the event that the Bill receives Royal Assent and the  Secretary of State exercises his powers of compulsory acquisition.\r\n3.2  In this assurance, “agricultural building” includes a residential building occupied as part of an agricultural building.\r\n\r\n","Identification of land for the relocation of agricultural buildings \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 3\r\n","2019-02-13","Assurance","Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS13 3QL and Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.9","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","5.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n5.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n5.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n5.4 Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n5.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n5.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson.  Additional Infrastructure, assurance 5\r\n","2019-02-13","Assurance","Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS13 3QL and Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.10","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","1.1 During the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult with the Petitioners and use reasonable endeavours to identify, subject to obtaining any necessary consents and/or land rights, an Alternative Location for the Specified Works.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Alternative Location” means an appropriate and suitable alternative location within that part of the Property shown shaded blue on Plan 3 for the Specified Works;\r\n“Petitioners” means Richard Smith and Colin Smith of Pipe Hall Farm, Pipe Ridware, Rugeley WS15 3QL and trading as R J Smith and Son;\r\n“Specified Works” means the works authorised by the Bill to install pipework for the purposes of groundwater recharge within that part of the Property situated within Plots AP2-6, AP2-7 and AP2-8 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware and shown on the deposited plans as deposited in the House of Commons on 8 February 2019 with additional provision 2 to the Bill.","Ground Water Recharge\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 1\r\n","2019-04-02","Assurance","Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS13 3QL and Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.11","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","2.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill that are proposed to be constructed on or operated from any part of the Property for the purposes of the operation of the Borrow Pit, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult the Petitioners regarding the Nominated Undertaker’s preparation of the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology.\r\n2.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation under paragraph 2.1 above and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors including but not limited to the relevant factors referred to in paragraph 2.4 below associated with the design, construction, operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit,\r\n2.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n2.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioners to modify the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioners’ agricultural holding operated by the Petitioners on or from the Property during the period of the excavation of the Borrow Pit by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology which gives rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement.\r\n2.4 The relevant factors referred to in paragraph 2.2 above are:-\r\n2.4.1 any requirements of the local planning authority for the approval of the operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit under Schedule 17 of the Bill;\r\n2.4.2 the safe, timely and economic operation of the Borrow Pit;\r\n2.4.3 compliance with other relevant undertakings and assurances; and\t\r\n2.4.4 the safe, timely and economic delivery of any other works for the Proposed Scheme connected with, or within the vicinity of, the Borrow Pit.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Borrow Pit” means the borrow pit known as Borrow Pit 4 (193) and located within plots 4, 5 and 8 in the Parish of Hamstall Ridware and within plots 9 and 11 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware as shown on the deposited plans as deposited with the Bill;\r\n“Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology\" means the methodology for the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which shall include the following:- \r\na) information on the method or methods for the extraction of materials from any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property,\r\nb) information on any other works and/or activities required in connection with the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which are to be constructed and/or undertaken on or from the Property, and\r\nc) information on any sequencing of material extraction operations for any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property;\r\n“Petitioners” means Richard Smith and Colin Smith of Pipe Hall Farm, Pipe Ridware, Rugeley WS15 3QL and trading as R J Smith and Son.\r\n","Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 2\r\n","2019-04-02","Assurance","The borrow pit known as Borrow Pit 4 (193) and located within plots 4, 5 and 8 in the Parish of Hamstall Ridware and within plots 9 and 11 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware as shown on the deposited plans as deposited with the Bill","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.12","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","3.1 Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions referred to in paragraph 3.2 below, the Secretary of State will reduce the area of land within Area B over which the Acquisition Powers are exercised for the purposes of undertaking material extraction operations for the Borrow Pit to an extent proportionate to the area of land within Area A that is made available by the Petitioners for the purposes of undertaking material extraction operations for the Borrow Pit.\r\n3.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 3.1 above are:-\r\n3.2.1 the Petitioners entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State for the transfer to the Secretary of State of Area A or any part of Area A at a price that shall not be greater than the overall cost of the acquisition of Area A or any part of Area A if the Secretary of State had acquired Area A or any part of Area A under the Acquisition Powers;\r\n3.2.2 the Nominated Undertaker obtaining all relevant consents and approvals required for both undertaking material extraction operations on or from Area A or any part of Area A and the subsequent restoration of Area A or any part of Area A. For the avoidance of doubt this includes any consents or approvals as may be required from the local planning authority; \r\n3.2.3 the safe, timely and economic operation of the Borrow Pit;\r\n3.2.4 compliance with other relevant undertakings and assurances; and\r\n3.2.5 the safe, timely and economic delivery of any other works for the Proposed Scheme connected with, or within the vicinity of, the Borrow Pit.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Acquisition Powers”\tmeans the power of compulsory acquisition of land to be conferred on the Secretary of State under clause 4 of the Bill;\r\n“Area A” means that part of the Property shown coloured blue on Plan 1;\r\n“Area B” means that part of the Property shown coloured red on Plan 1;\r\n“the Borrow Pit” means the borrow pit known as Borrow Pit 4 (193) and located within plots 4, 5 and 8 in the Parish of Hamstall Ridware and within plots 9 and 11 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware as shown on the deposited plans as deposited with the Bill;\r\n“Petitioners” means Richard Smith and Colin Smith of Pipe Hall Farm, Pipe Ridware, Rugeley WS15 3QL and trading as R J Smith and Son.\r\n","Borrow Pit Location\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 3\r\n","2019-04-02","Assurance","The borrow pit known as Borrow Pit 4 (193) and located within plots 4, 5 and 8 in the Parish of Hamstall Ridware and within plots 9 and 11 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware as shown on the deposited plans as deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\nThose parts of Pipe Hall Farm, Pipe Ridware, Rugeley WS15 3QL shown coloured blue and red on Plan 1 attached to this assurance.","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.13","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","4.1 Subject to paragraph 4.2 below, during the period of the Nominated Undertaker’s operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit the Secretary of State will, subject to obtaining any necessary consents and /or land rights, require the Nominated Undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to provide the Temporary Cattle Access.\r\n4.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall not be required to provide the Temporary Cattle Access in the event that in consequence of paragraph 3 above a reasonable alternative means of temporary cattle access can be provided over Area B during the period of the Nominated Undertaker’s operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Area B” means that part of the Property shown coloured red on Plan 1;\r\n“the Borrow Pit”\tmeans the borrow pit known as Borrow Pit 4 (193) and located within plots 4, 5 and 8 in the Parish of Hamstall Ridware and within plots 9 and 11 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware as shown on the deposited plans as deposited with the Bill;\r\n\"Temporary Cattle Access\" means a temporary access route with a minimum width of 10 (ten) metres between the points marked ‘X’ and ‘Y’ on Plan 2 for use by the Petitioners in connection with the movement of cattle as part of the operation of the Petitioners’ agricultural holding on or from the Property.\r\n\r\n","Temporary Cattle Access\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 4\r\n","2019-04-02","Assurance","A route between the points marked ‘X’ and ‘Y’ on Plan 2 within “Area B”  that part of the Petitioner's Property shown coloured red on Plan 1. Both plans attached to this assurance. ","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.14","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, (Hinson, Parry & Company), Annex A\r\n","2019-07-08","Assurance","Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS13 3QL and Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.15","N/A","HoC/0059","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","1.1.\tPrior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner regarding the detailed design of the balancing pond, turning head and associated environmental mitigation coloured blue on the attached plan, proposed to be constructed upon the Petitioner’s landholding under the powers of the Bill.\r\n1.2.\tThe nominated undertaker shall have regard to the Petitioner’s responses under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors including but not limited to the relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.4 below associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of the balancing pond and other ecological or other mitigation seek to:\r\n1.2.1.\tminimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2.\taccommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the balancing pond.\r\n1.3.\tNothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology which gives rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement.\r\n1.4.\tThe relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.2 above are:\r\n1.4.1.\tthe safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n1.4.2.\tcompliance with other relevant undertakings and assurances.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\"Environmental Statement\" means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited at Parliament with the Bill;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Richard Smith and Colin Smith of Pipe Hall Farm, Pipe Ridware, Rugeley WS15 3QL and trading as R J Smith and Son;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Balancing Pond\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, (Hinson, Parry & Company) \r\n","2019-09-20","Assurance","detailed design of the balancing pond, turning head and associated environmental mitigation coloured blue on the attached plan, ","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.16","N/A","HoL/0008","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","1.1.\tSubject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below the Secretary of State shall acquire the Land for the purposes of the construction, operation and maintenance of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are:\r\n1.2.1.\tthe Petitioner, being the freehold owner and occupier of the Land entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the acquisition of the Land including the following terms:\r\n1.2.1.1.\tthe price to be paid for the Land and Property shall be assessed in accordance with the principles of the Compensation Code (or in the absence of agreement, by the price being 90% of the Secretary of State’s assessment of the acquisition price) as if assessed as an advanced payment under s.52 of the Land Compensation Act 1973. The acquisition price shall be in full and final settlement of all claims for compensation in respect of the open market value of the Land and Property to be acquired;\r\n1.2.1.2.\tin the absence of agreement between the parties, any dispute as to compensation to be referred to the Upper Tribunal;\r\n1.2.1.3.\tthe Land will be acquired under the principles of the Compensation Code as set out by Section 5 of the Land Compensation Act 1961 including Rule 2 and Rule 6 with the full benefit of the Compensation Code including reference to the Upper Tribunal for non-agreed elements etc;\r\n1.2.1.4.\tthe valuation date for the Land will be the earlier of the date of completion of the sale of the Land and entry by the Secretary of State under powers of entry to be conferred under the Bill;\r\n1.2.1.5.\tany claim for compensation for the acquisition of the Land will be calculated under the principles of the Compensation Code and valued the valuation date;\r\n1.2.1.6.\tthe agreement will provide for the purchase price and compensation of Land and Property to be acquired is payable subject to phased payments following completion of milestones; \r\n1.2.1.7.\tthe Secretary of State’s agreement to the purchase price and advanced payment is subject to conditions required by the Secretary of State relating to the provision by the Petitioner of relocated facilities contained in the agreement; \r\n1.2.1.8.\ton completion of the sale of the Land the Secretary of State will grant a farm business tenancy of the Land on terms acceptable to the Secretary of State and including conditions set out in the Schedule attached to these assurances. The agreement will include clauses agreed between the parties on the insurance of the Land and mechanisms in the event of any damage of the Land; \r\n1.2.1.9.\tthe Petitioner shall deliver vacant possession of the Land by the possession date, being the termination date of the tenancy;\r\n1.2.1.10. the agreement will also include any other clauses required by the Secretary of State in order to facilitate the transfer of the Land; \r\n1.2.1.11. the agreement will make provision for the Secretary of State, in contemplating a disposal under the terms of the 2019 Rules, to waive the exception set out in paragraph 10 of the 2019 Rules when considering the extent to which the character of the Land may have changed as a result of the construction of the authorised works on the Land;\r\n1.2.1.12. the agreement will make provision that:\r\n(i)\tthe Land need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the Land; and\r\n(ii)\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n(iii)\tprovides for the maintenance of any environmental mitigation to be provided on the Land; \r\nprovided that the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an owner-occupier of adjoining land and an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;\r\n1.2.1.13. the Secretary of State shall reimburse the Petitioner for reasonable legal and agents fees incurred in dealing with the acquisition of the Land, the Farmhouse and the leaseback to the extent that these are covered by the Compensation Code. Agents fees to be reimbursed at the rates currently agreed.\r\n1.2.2 Nothing in these assurances shall prevent the Secretary of State serving notice under the Phase 2a Bill as enacted the Secretary of State will pay compensation in line with the Compensation Code and taking account of any payments of compensation that have actually been made to the Petitioner so there shall be no double recovery of compensation.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“2019 Rules” means the Crichel Down Rules as amended in July 2019;\r\n“authorised works” means the works to be authorised under the Bill;\r\n“Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the “Bill” includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Compensation Code” means the collective term for the legal principles relating to the compensation for compulsory acquisition and deriving from Acts of Parliament and case law;\r\n“Land” means the 45.797 hectares of agricultural land at Pipe Hall Farm, shown for the purpose of identification only edged on red, blue, yellow and green on plan 1; \r\n“the Petitioner” means Messrs Richard and Colin Smith;\r\n“the Plan” means the plan annexed to these assurances; and\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Acquisition\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, (Hinson, Parry & Company), Annex A \r\n","2019-10-22","Assurance","Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C21.17","N/A","HoL/0008","Messrs Richard and Colin Smith","Subject to you countersigning this letter confirming that the Petitioners will use reasonable endeavours to continue negotiations in good faith with the Promoter to complete the Documentation the Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to continue negotiations in good faith with the Petitioners to complete the Documentation as soon as reasonably practicable prior to Royal Assent for the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Documentation” means:\r\na)\tA set of heads of terms making provision for the completion of the documents referred to in b) to f) below;\r\nb)\tAn Agreement for the sale and purchase of land at Pipe Hall Farm, Pipe Ridware, Rugeley, Warwickshire, WS15 3Q to be entered into by (1) the Petitioners, (2) Helen Jane Smith and (3)  the Secretary of State for Transport;\r\nc)\tAn Option Agreement in respect of land at Pipe Hall Farm, Pipe Ridware, Rugeley, Warwickshire, WS15 3QL to be entered into by (1) the Petitioners, (2) Helen Jane Smith and (3) the Secretary of State for Transport;\r\nd)\t2 Transfer Deeds in form TR1 for the transfers of the freehold land referred to in 1) above;\r\ne)\tA Farm business tenancy relating to premises at Pipe Hall Farm, Pipe Ridware, Rugeley, Warwickshire, WS15 3Q to be entered into by (1) the Secretary of State for Transport, (2) the Petitioners and (3) Helen Jane Smith; and\r\nf)\tA Rent Deposit Deed to be entered into between (1) the Secretary of State, (2) High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd, (3) the Petitioners and (4) Helen Jane Smith;\r\n\r\n","Documentation of heads of terms\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight  (HS2) to Roger Bedson, (Hinson, Parry & Company), \r\n","2020-09-03","Assurance","Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS13 3QL and Pipe Hall Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QL","Stafford Borough"]
["C22","Mycock, Trevor","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C22.1","N/A","HoC/0058","Trevor Mycock","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 Seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 Seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Trevor Mycock, assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Townend Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3RX","Stafford Borough"]
["C22.2","N/A","HoC/0058","Trevor Mycock","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction.  Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n2.5. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.6. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.7 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Trevor Mycock, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Townend Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3RX","Stafford Borough"]
["C22.3","N/A","HoC/0058","Trevor Mycock","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Trevor Mycock, assurance 3\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Townend Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3RX","Stafford Borough"]
["C22.4","N/A","HoC/0058","Trevor Mycock","1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the width of the landscape mitigation planting proposed to be located within the Blue Land, and shown indicatively in blue on attached [attached to beneficiary letter] annotated plan CT-06-207 in the Supplementary Environmental Statement and Additional Provision (Volume 2: Map Book CA1: Fradley to Colton), to a width of approximately 10m.\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n(i) an alternative suitable area of land being available so to relocate the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1 if such relocation is required;\r\n(ii) the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1  not creating any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n(iii) the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1 not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n(iv) the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1 not requiring the acquisition by the Secretary of State of any land outside of the Petitioners’ land ownership; and\r\n(v) the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1 receiving approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n","Landscape Mitigation planting\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Trevor Mycock, assurance 1\r\n","2018-06-04","Assurance","Townend Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3RX","Stafford Borough"]
["C22.5","N/A","HoC/0058","Trevor Mycock","2.1 \tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 2.2 the Secretary of State will not exercise the powers conferred by the Bill so as to compulsorily acquire the Green Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation on the Green Land.\r\n2.2  The conditions referred to in paragraph 2.1 are:\r\n(a) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the relocation of ecological mitigation works to the Red Land will not affect the proposed diversion of Footpath 73, across Colton Footpath 73 Overbridge (and also identified as Work No. 21 on Replacement Sheet No. 1-15 of attached Plan No.2 [attached to beneficiary letter], deposited with the Additional Provision (March 2018);\r\n(b) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Petitioners are the appropriate persons, having regard to the nature and objectives of the ecological mitigation required to be provided on the Red Land, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that ecological mitigation; and\r\n(c) the Petitioners entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n(i) provides that following the completion by the nominated undertaker of any construction activities for the Proposed Scheme on or from the Red Land the Secretary of State shall not be required to restore any such parts of the Red Land to the its condition prior to the commencement of any such construction activities;\r\n(ii) restricts any use of the Red Land which would remove or interfere with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n(iii) provides for the maintenance and management of the ecological mitigation to be provided on or by the Red Land; and\r\n(d) the Secretary of State reaching agreement with the Petitioners, in a form acceptable to the Secretary of State, as to the level of compensation payable in respect of the exercise of the temporary possession powers conferred by the Bill over the Red Land in advance of the nominated undertaker taking temporary possession of the Red Land or any part of it.\r\n","Ecological mitigation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Trevor Mycock, assurance 2\r\n","2018-06-04","Assurance","Townend Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3RX","Stafford Borough"]
["C22.6","N/A","HoC/0058","Trevor Mycock","3.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to use reasonable endeavours to relocate the Balancing Pond subject to the nominated undertaker identifying an alternative site within the Act limits (as defined by the Bill), which can be used for the purposes of the relocation of the Balancing Pond subject to the following conditions:-\r\n(i) the Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents required in order to deliver the drainage requirements for the Proposed Scheme at any alternative site;\r\n(ii) that any alternative site will not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n(iii) that the Balancing Pond can be relocated without prejudicing the safety, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n(iv) any proposed alternative site for the Balancing Pond receiving approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n3.2 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consider the suitability of Option 3 as part of the nominated undertaker’s consideration of options for alternative sites for the Balancing Pond","Relocation of balancing pond\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Trevor Mycock, assurance 3\r\n","2018-06-04","Assurance","Townend Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3RX","Stafford Borough"]
["C22.7","N/A","HoC/0058","Trevor Mycock","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Trevor Mycock \r\n","2019-07-08","Assurance","Townend Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3RX","Stafford Borough"]
["C23","Roobottom, Graham and Rachel","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C23.1","N/A","HoC/0056","Graham and Rachel Roobottom","1.1.Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 Seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 Seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Graham and Rachel Roobottom, assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Cowley Hill Farm, Rugeley, \r\nWS15 3QQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C23.2","N/A","HoC/0056","Graham and Rachel Roobottom","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3.The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction.  Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n2.5. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.6. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.7 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Graham and Rachel Roobottom, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Cowley Hill Farm, Rugeley, \r\nWS15 3QQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C23.3","N/A","HoC/0056","Graham and Rachel Roobottom","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 1","2019-02-14","Assurance","Cowley Hill Farm, Rugeley, \r\nWS15 3QQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C23.4","N/A","HoC/0056","Graham and Rachel Roobottom","2.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n2.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n2.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 2","2019-02-14","Assurance","Cowley Hill Farm, Rugeley, \r\nWS15 3QQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C23.5","N/A","HoC/0056","Graham and Rachel Roobottom","3.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n3.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n3.4 Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n3.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 3","2019-02-14","Assurance","Cowley Hill Farm, Rugeley, \r\nWS15 3QQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C23.6","N/A","HoC/0056","Graham and Rachel Roobottom","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Cowley Hill Farm, Rugeley, \r\nWS15 3QQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C24","Parkinson, Robert, Helen and Richard","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C24.1","N/A","HoC/0018","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 Seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 Seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert Parkinson, assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Lee Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.2","N/A","HoC/0018","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction.  Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n2.5. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.6. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.7 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert Parkinson, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Lee Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.3","N/A","HoC/0018","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2  Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert Parkinson, assurance 3\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Lee Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.4","N/A","HoC/0018","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","(1) In the event that the yellow land has been acquired by the Promoter and following construction, is no longer required for the authorised works, and is available for disposal on the open market in accordance with the Crichel Down Rules, the Promoter will consider proposals by the Petitioner to acquire the yellow land at open market value from the Promoter.\r\n(2) In the event that the yellow land is disposed of to the Petitioner, the Promoter will not construct either the access track or the alternative access track.\r\n(3) In the event that the yellow land is disposed of to the current owner or a third party, pursuant to the Crichel Down Rules, the Promoter will not construct the access track in the event that the alternative access track can be constructed in accordance with paragraph (5).\r\n(4) The Promoter shall only construct the alternative access track if \r\n(i) the construction of the alternative access track is within the scope of the Bill and does not require any further or other consents;\r\n(ii) all necessary consents under Schedule 17 are obtained for the development of the alternative access track;\r\n(iii) the development of the alternative access track is within the scope of the Environmental Impact Assessment undertaken for the Bill and does not create any new or different adverse significant effects; and\r\n(iv) the construction of the alternative access does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic construction of the authorised works.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the access track” means the access track between the B5013 Uttoxeter Road and the yellow land which is proposed to be constructed under the Bill to create a means of vehicular and pedestrian access to the yellow land and coloured red on the Drawing following completion of the authorised works;\r\n“the alternative access track“ means an alternative means of vehicular and pedestrian access to the yellow land to be constructed following completion of the authorised works on land within Bill Limits and/or on land within the ownership of the Petitioner and coloured blue on the Drawing;\r\n“the authorised works” means the works to be authorised under the Bill, including for the avoidance of any doubt the carrying out of environmental mitigation works of any description and/or sustainable placement; and \r\n“yellow land“ means the land shaded yellow on the attached sketch Ref (P2A-018 - Parkinson, Lea Hall Farm - HOC-2.41a) (“the Drawing”).\r\n","Access to Third Party Land\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert Parkinson","2018-06-01","Assurance","Lee Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.5","N/A","HoC/0018","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","(1) The Promoter shall where reasonably practicable and subject to the Petitioner’s reasonable requirements provide the access track on the following conditions:\r\n(i). the construction of the access track is within the scope of the Bill and does not require any further or other consents;\r\n(ii) all necessary consents under Schedule 17 are obtained for the development of the access track;\r\n(iii) the development of the access track is within the scope of the Environmental Impact Assessment undertaken for the Bill and does not create any new or different adverse significant effects; and\r\n(iv) the construction of the access does not prejudice the timely and economic construction of the authorised works.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“access track” means the access track between the end of Jonghams Lane under Moreton Brook Viaduct to the field North East of Hamley (North) Drop Inlet Culvert\r\n","Rights of access on Jonghams Lane and under Moreton Brook Viaduct \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert Parkinson, assurance 1\r\n","2018-06-01","Assurance","Lee Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.6","N/A","HoC/0018","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","(2) On completion of that part of the authorised works associated with the construction of the Viaduct and any ancillary or related activities, the Promoter will:- \r\n(i) give written notice to the Petitioner of the effective completion of the construction of those works; and\r\n(ii) use reasonable endeavours to enter into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State granting access rights if the Petitioner makes such a written request to the Promoter within three months of receipt of such notification from the Promoter.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Viaduct” means the section of railway viaduct carrying the HS2 High Speed Railway to be known as Moreton Brook Viaduct and marked with a red line on the attached indicative drawing ref P2A-018_HOC-2.39 – Parkinson, Lea Hall Farm (“the Drawing”)\r\n","Rights of access on Jonghams Lane and under Moreton Brook Viaduct \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert Parkinson, assurance 2\r\n","2018-06-01","Assurance","Lee Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.7","N/A","HoC/0018","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","(3) Without limitation to the terms which the Promoter may impose in response to a request made by the Petitioner under paragraph (2), the duration of any access rights granted by the Promoter shall only subsist for so long as the Petitioner is the owner and occupier of the relevant land and uses the relevant land for the purposes of agricultural production.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“relevant land” means the green land and the blue land; and\r\n“blue land” means the agricultural land shown edged in blue on the indicative Drawing which is owned and occupied by the Petitioner;\r\n“green land “ means the agricultural land shown edged in green on the indicative Drawing which is owned and occupied by the Petitioner;","Rights of access on Jonghams Lane and under Moreton Brook Viaduct ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert Parkinson,  assurance 3\r\n","2018-06-01","Assurance","The agricultural land shown edged in blue and the agricultural land shown edged in green on the indicative Drawing attached to the letter\r\n","Lichfield District"]
["C24.8","N/A","HoC/0018","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","(4) If –\r\n(i) a written request from the Petitioner is not received by the Promoter within the three months period specified in paragraph (2), or\r\n (ii) the Petitioner is not the owner and occupier of the relevant land when a written request is served on the Promoter under paragraph (2), or\r\n(iii) the relevant land is no longer being used for agricultural purposes when a written request is served on the Promoter under paragraph (2),\r\nthe Promoter will not be under any further obligation to consider the grant of access rights.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“access rights” means vehicular, livestock and pedestrian access rights granted by the Promoter to the Petitioner to enable the Petitioner to pass and repass beneath the Viaduct across land owned by the Promoter to access the green land and/or the blue land for the purposes of farming the relevant land subject to such vehicular weight/ height/width restrictions and other relevant limitations and terms, including financial contributions by the Petitioner towards the maintenance and use of the access, as the Promoter considers appropriate to safeguard the safe, timely and economic operation and maintenance of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n\r\n“blue land” means the agricultural land shown edged in blue on the indicative Drawing which is owned and occupied by the Petitioner;\r\n“green land “ means the agricultural land shown edged in green on the indicative Drawing which is owned and occupied by the Petitioner;\r\n","Rights of access on Jonghams Lane and under Moreton Brook Viaduct \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert Parkinson,  assurance 4\r\n","2018-06-01","Assurance","The agricultural land shown edged in blue and the agricultural land shown edged in green on the indicative Drawing attached to the letter\r\n","Lichfield District"]
["C24.9","N/A","HoC/0018","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","\r\n1.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours not to exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Yellow Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below.\r\n1.2 The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to:\r\n(i) the nominated undertaker being satisfied that reducing the delivered area of mitigation will not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n(ii) the provision of a reduced area of ecological mitigation receiving approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill; and \r\n(iii) the nominated undertaker concluding that the change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.3 The nominated undertaker will where reasonably practicable modify the design of the balancing pond and access road for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the works\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Yellow Land” means the land coloured yellow on the attached plan being part of the land in plot 214 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-20 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill. The land has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of ecological mitigation, an access road, and balancing pond\r\n","Reduction in environmental planting around balancing pond\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert Parkinson\r\n","2018-06-05","Assurance","Lee Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.10","N/A","HoC/0018","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","1.1 The Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Green Land for the purposes of providing woodland habitat creation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below.\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 is subject to:\r\n(a) the Petitioner entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the construction and maintenance of the landscape planting to be provided on the Blue Land, subject to a management and maintenance agreement with the Petitioner and the Secretary of State;\r\n(b) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the woodland habitat creation planting required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of the woodland habitat creation;\r\n(c) the Blue Land not being subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the construction, maintenance or the objectives of the woodland habitat creation required to be provided on the Blue Land; and\r\n(d) all necessary approvals required from the local planning authority for constructing and maintaining the woodland habitat creation on the Blue Land\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Green Land” means the land coloured green on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plots 213 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-20 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“the Blue Land” means the land coloured blue on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plots 213 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-20 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill, being the area of land outside of Bill limits proposed for woodland habitat creation.\r\n","Relocation of woodland habitat creation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert Parkinson\r\n","2018-06-05","Assurance","Lee Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.11","N/A","HoC/0018","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1\r\n","2019-02-14","Assurance","Lea Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.12","N/A","HoC/0018","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","2.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2  The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage  \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2\r\n","2019-02-14","Assurance","Lea Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.13","N/A","AP2/0003","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","1.1. The nominated undertaker will use the Replacement Land for the purposes of the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles and shall not exercise the compulsory acquisition powers conferred in the Bill for the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 and 1.3.\r\n\r\n1.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n\r\n1.2.1 the nominated undertaker, using reasonable endeavours, obtains all necessary consents and permissions required for the use of the Replacement Land at the Secretary of State’s cost provided that such consents can be reasonably implemented and are granted in time to align with the programme of construction of the Temporary Material Stockpiles without causing delay or interruption to the construction of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n\r\n1.2.2 the nominated undertaker concludes that any change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without adverse impact on the construction programme of the Proposed Scheme or prejudicing the safety, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n\r\n1.2.3 compliance with other relevant undertakings and assurances;\r\n\r\n1.2.4 the Secretary of State is the freehold owner and occupier of the Replacement Land; and\r\n\r\n1.2.5 the Replacement Land is at the disposal of the Secretary of State for the purposes of relocating Temporary Material Stockpiles and Local Placement.\r\n\r\n1.3 For the avoidance of doubt, this assurance will only apply where the Petitioner is the owner of the land where the Temporary Material Stockpiles and Local Placement (“the Land”) is currently proposed on Plan 1. Should the Petitioner sell the Land or have submitted an accepted blight notice in respect of the Land, the Secretary of State reserves the right to use the Land for the provision of Temporary Material Stockpiles and Local Placement.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Replacement Land” means the land identified by HS2 Ltd as being suitable to relocate the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles as illustrated edged red on Plan 2;\r\n\r\n“the Local Placement” refers to the proposed local placement as illustrated edged red on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“the Temporary Material Stockpiles” means the proposed temporary material stockpiles at the Property as illustrated brown on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“Plan 1” means the attached plan illustrating the current proposed location of the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles;\r\n\r\n“Plan 2” means the attached plan illustrating the Replacement Land for the relocation of the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles;\r\n\r\n“the Petitioner” means Mr Robert and Mrs Helen and Mr Richard Parkinson of Lea Hall Farm, Admaston, Rugeley WS15 3NN.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Use of alternative sites for Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1.1","2019-04-15","Assurance","Lea Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.14","N/A","AP2/0003","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","2.1\tIn the event it is not possible to use the Replacement Land for the purposes of Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles in accordance with paragraph 1,  the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to review the use of the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles, and following such review will consider whether it is reasonably practicable to reduce and/or relocate the size of the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles proposed as illustrated on Plan 1.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Replacement Land” means the land identified by HS2 Ltd as being suitable to relocate the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles as illustrated edged red on Plan 2;\r\n\r\n“the Local Placement” refers to the proposed local placement as illustrated edged red on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“the Temporary Material Stockpiles” means the proposed temporary material stockpiles at the Property as illustrated brown on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“Plan 1” means the attached plan illustrating the current proposed location of the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles;\r\n\r\n“Plan 2” means the attached plan illustrating the Replacement Land for the relocation of the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles.\r\n","Review of Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2.1","2019-04-15","Assurance","Lea Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.15","N/A","AP2/0003","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","2.2\tThe nominated undertaker will, during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, seek to engage with the Petitioner and will inform them of the outcome of the review of the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles as described in paragraph 2.1.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Petitioner” means Mr Robert and Mrs Helen and Mr Richard Parkinson of Lea Hall Farm, Admaston, Rugeley WS15 3NN;\r\n\r\n“the Local Placement” refers to the proposed local placement as illustrated edged red on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“the Temporary Material Stockpiles” means the proposed temporary material stockpiles at the Property as illustrated brown on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“Plan 1” means the attached plan illustrating the current proposed location of the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n ","Engagement regarding the Review of Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2.2","2019-04-15","Assurance","Lea Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.16","N/A","AP2/0003","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","3.1 If the nominated undertaker confirms that the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles are to be retained as illustrated on Plan 1, then the Petitioner will be provided with details of the schedule and duration of the associated HS2 Works. The nominated undertaker will continue to engage with Petitioner throughout the duration of HS2 Works and will fulfil its existing commitment to put in place an agricultural liaison service.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n\r\n“the Local Placement” refers to the proposed local placement as illustrated edged red on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“the Temporary Material Stockpiles” means the proposed temporary material stockpiles at the Property as illustrated brown on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“Plan 1” means the attached plan illustrating the current proposed location of the Local Placement and Temporary Material Stockpiles;\r\n\r\n“the Petitioner” means Mr Robert and Mrs Helen and Mr Richard Parkinson of Lea Hall Farm, Admaston, Rugeley WS15 3NN.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information on HS2 Works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3.1","2019-04-15","Assurance","Lea Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C24.17","N/A","AP2/0003","Robert, Helen, and Richard Parkinson","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Lea Hall Farm, Lea Lane, \r\nAdmaston, WS15 3NN","Lichfield District"]
["C25","Froggatt, David and Sian","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C25.1","N/A","HoC/0175","David and Sian Froggatt","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David and Sian Froggat, assurance 1\r\n","2018-06-05","Assurance","Quinton's Orchard Farm\r\nRugeley, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.2","N/A","HoC/0175","David and Sian Froggatt","2.1.  The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David and Sian Froggat, assurance 2\r\n","2018-06-05","Assurance","Quinton's Orchard Farm\r\nRugeley, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.3","N/A","HoC/0175","David and Sian Froggatt","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David and Sian Froggat, assurance 3\r\n","2018-06-05","Assurance","Quinton's Orchard Farm\r\nRugeley, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.4","N/A","HoC/0175, AP1/0020","David and Sian Froggatt","1.  In order to control the impacts of dust, as a result of construction activities on Quinton Orchard fishery ponds, the Secretary of State will instruct the nominated undertaker to have regard for the measures set out in section 7 entitled \"Air Quality\" of the Code of Construction Practice paying particular attention to sections 7.1\"Air quality management - general provisions\" and 7.2.6 \"Excavation and earthworks activities\". The Secretary of State will also instruct the nominated undertaker to require its contractors to manage and mitigate airborne contaminants (dust, air pollution, odour and exhaust emissions) during the construction works in accordance with best practicable means.\r\n","Air Quality","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP), assurance 1","2018-07-06","Assurance","Quinton's Orchard Farm\r\nRugeley, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.5","N/A","HoC/0175, AP1/0020","David and Sian Froggatt","1.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to construct the Accommodation Overbridge to the Minimum Specification.\r\n\r\n1.2. The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to the nominated undertaker concluding that construction of the Accommodation Overbridge to the Minimum Specification would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Accommodation Overbridge” means the Mavesyn Ridware Footpath 38 Accommodation Overbridge forming part of Work No.16 as shown indicatively on plan CT-06-205 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n\r\n“Minimum Specification” means able to accommodate vehicles of up to 19.920 metres in length, up to 2.500 metres in width, a minimum ground clearance of 0.398 metres, a maximum vehicle track width of 2.500 metres, a lock to lock time of up to 4.00 seconds and a kerb to kerb turning radius of up to 4.630 metres\r\n\r\n","Accommodation Overbridge","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP), assurance 1","2018-07-11","Assurance","The Mavesyn Ridware Footpath 38 Accommodation Overbridge forming part of Work No.16 as shown indicatively on plan CT-06-205","Lichfield District"]
["C25.6","N/A","HoC/0175, AP1/0020","David and Sian Froggatt","\r\n2.1 Following the completion of the construction of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will grant to the Petitioner a right to use the Accommodation Overbridge.\r\n\r\n2.2 The grant of the right of access under paragraph 2.1 shall be subject to the nominated undertaker imposing restrictions on the maximum weight and size of vehicles that may be used over and along the right of access over the Accommodation Overbridge.  \r\n\r\n2.3 Any restrictions imposed under paragraph 2.2 will only be imposed so far as is necessary to ensure the safety and integrity of the operational railway and its infrastructure. \r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Accommodation Overbridge” means the Mavesyn Ridware Footpath 38 Accommodation Overbridge forming part of Work No.16 as shown indicatively on plan CT-06-205 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n","Right to use Accommodation Overbridge","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP), assurance 2","2018-07-11","Assurance","The Mavesyn Ridware Footpath 38 Accommodation Overbridge forming part of Work No.16 as shown indicatively on plan CT-06-205","Lichfield District"]
["C25.7","N/A","HoC/0175, AP1/0020","David and Sian Froggatt","3.1 The Secretary of State will promote an Additional Provision to enable the construction of the Haul Route on an alternative alignment to the alignment currently proposed under AP1 and shown on the AP1 Plans (the “Alternative Haul Route Alignment”).\r\n\r\n3.2 Subject to the successful promotion of an Additional Provision to enable the construction of the Alternative Haul Route Alignment and any further approvals required under Schedule 17 to the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to:\r\n\r\n3.2.1 construct the Alternative Haul Route Alignment;\r\n\r\n3.2.2 use the Alternative Haul Route Alignment only in connection with the construction of the Proposed Scheme; and \r\n\r\n3.2.3 to remove the Alternative Haul Route Alignment following the completion of such construction.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Haul Route” means the haul route and maintenance access proposed to be constructed on the Petitioner’s Property under the Proposed Scheme;\r\n\r\n“Petitioner’s Property” means Agricultural land, hedgerows and access track (Pipe Lane) at Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, WS15 3JL;\r\n","Haul Route","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP), assurance 3","2018-07-11","Assurance","Agricultural land, hedgerows and access track (Pipe Lane) at Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.8","N/A","HoC/0175, AP1/0020","David and Sian Froggatt","\r\n4.1  The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to relocate the ecological mitigation area on the Green Land shown on plan 1 to the Blue Land shown on plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n\r\n4.2 The assurance in paragraph 4.1 is subject to:\r\n(a) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the ecological mitigation can be delivered on  the 'Blue Land' without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n\r\n(b) the Petitioners obtaining and providing to the Secretary of State evidence of a written consent of the freehold owner of the Blue Land to the location of the ecological mitigation area on the Blue Land;\r\n\r\n(c) a management agreement between the Petitioners, the Secretary of State and the freehold owner of the Blue Land, setting out the principles of management of the ecological mitigation area on the Blue Land; \r\n\r\n(d)  the Secretary of State securing any and all necessary consents for delivering the ecological mitigation area on the Blue Land; and\r\n\r\n(e) the Secretary of State  being of the view that the relocation of the ecological mitigation area to the Blue Land does not   prejudice  the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Green Land” means the land edged green on the attached plan being part of the land in plot 82 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware in the County of Staffordshire as shown in Sheet No. 1-13 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill; \r\n\r\n“the Blue Land” means the land edged blue on the attached plan being part of the land in plot 22 in the Parish of Colwich in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet No. 1-21 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill; \r\n","Mitigation Planting","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP), assurance 4","2018-07-11","Assurance","The land edged green on the attached plan being part of the land in plot 82 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware in the County of Staffordshire as shown in Sheet No. 1-13 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill and the land edged blue on the attached plan being part of the land in plot 22 in the Parish of Colwich in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet No. 1-21 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill.","Lichfield District"]
["C25.9","N/A","HoC/0175, AP1/0020","David and Sian Froggatt","1.1 The nominated undertaker, liaising with representatives of the Petitioner and subject to being granted all necessary rights of access and being provided with any necessary consents for carrying out monitoring and other activities, shall ensure that, as soon as reasonably practicable and prior to the commencement of the works related to the construction of the Proposed Scheme within the vicinity of the Petitioner’s Property, a risk assessment (“the Risk Assessment”) is carried out by competent specialists of the potential impacts in relation to noise and vibration effects, potential dust effects, for potential biosecurity effects and for potential water contamination effects from the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme on the Petitioner’s Fish Farming Activity.\r\n2.1 If the Risk Assessment identifies the potential for harmful effects on the Petitioner’s Fish Farm Activity, the nominated undertaker will develop an action plan (“Action Plan”) and will seek to reduce air quality impacts identified in the Risk Assessment. The Action Plan may include but will not necessarily be limited to the identification of control measures to be adopted, a monitoring regime (including the identification of trigger levels) and associated control mechanisms.\r\n3.1 Objective\r\nAn appropriate representation of the Promoter and the Petitioner, will form a working group to collaborate and review the implementation of the Action Plan and be consulted on monitoring data and the implementation of any control mechanisms.\r\n3.2 Duration\r\nThe working group is to be established upon Royal Assent of the Bill and cease at the ‘Testing and Commissioning Phase’.\r\n3.3 Meetings\r\nThe working group shall meet at least once every quarter with additional meetings scheduled as necessary. The meetings will be chaired by the Head of Acquisitions.\r\n3.4 Terms of Reference\r\nThe members agree to develop a terms of reference for the working group as soon as reasonably practicable.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Head of Acquisitions” means Michael Eckett or one of his direct reports or any successor which shall be communicated in advance to the Representative;\r\n“the Petitioner’s Fish Farming Activity” means the Quinton’s Orchard Fish Farm carried out on the Petitioner’s Property;\r\n“the Petitioner’s Property” means Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL;\r\n \"the Representative” means a person appointed by the farmers to represent and liaise with HS2 Ltd on their behalf who can be contactable at all reasonable times.\r\n","Risk Assessment, Action Plan","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP), assurance 1 to 3","2018-11-19","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.10","N/A","HoC/0175, AP1/0020","David and Sian Froggatt","4.1 The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to design and construct the balancing pond shown within cells F6 and G6 on plan CT06-205 of Volume 2 (Fradley to Colton) of the Environmental Statement, appended to this assurance (“the balancing pond”) with an impermeable lining, which in tandem with the measures set out within the Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) will ensure compliance with the Environmental Minimum Requirements (EMRs).“\r\n","Balancing Pond","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP), assurance 4","2018-11-19","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.11","N/A","HoC/0175, AP1/0020","David and Sian Froggatt","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, during detailed design of the authorised works in the vicinity of Pipe Lane, to seek to engage with the Petitioners regarding the movement of their farm machinery and vehicles between Quintons Orchard Farm and Longacre Farm along Pipe Lane, with a view to reducing, so far as reasonably practicable, the impacts on the Petitioners’ farming operations of the utility diversion works connecting to Quintons Orchard Farm from Pipe Lane.","Detailed Design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to John Uffold, McCartneys LLP","2019-04-02","Assurance","Quintons Orchard Farm and Longacre Farm along Pipe Lane","Lichfield District"]
["C25.12","N/A","AP2/0049","David and Sian Froggatt","14. The Promoter will make an offer to acquire Norman’s Bungalow at market value once completed. The Promoter will work with the utilities provider to determine an appropriate route to provide water to Quinton’s Orchard Farm, with the aim of avoiding the established native bluebell beds within Bill limits along Quintons Orchard Drive. The Promoter confirms that local placement will not be deposited on Mr & Mrs Froggatt’s land and will give them an assurance to that effect. \r\n","Norman's Bungalow and Quinton's Orchard Farm","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's Third Special Report of Session 2017-2019, paragraph 14","2019-06-24","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.13","N/A","AP2/0049","David and Sian Froggatt","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP)","2019-07-08","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.14","N/A","AP2/0049","David and Sian Froggatt","\r\n2.1\tThe Promoter will require the nominated undertaker:-\r\n2.1.1\tto work with the Utilities Provider to determine an appropriate route to provide piped water to Quinton’s Orchard Farm, with the aim of avoiding the established native bluebell beds within Bill limits along Quintons Orchard Drive; \r\n2.1.2\tnot to use the Petitioners Land for the local placement of surplus materials; and\r\n2.1.3\tto write as soon as reasonably practicable to the Petitioner setting out proposed terms for a negotiated acquisition of the freehold interest in “Norman’s Bungalow” from the Petitioners.\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“Norman’s Bungalow” means the bungalow situated at Pipewood, Blithbury registered as HM Land Registry Title SF614048 and shown coloured Turquoise on the Plan A and being land outside of limits but shown on Replacement Sheet 1-14 Inset A; \r\n“the Petitioners” means David Froggatt and Sian Froggatt of Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Pipe Lane, Blithbury, Rugeley, WS15 3JL;\r\n\"Quintons Orchard Drive” means the unadopted access track, identified as Plots AP1-27, AP1-28 and AP2-21 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware in the District of Lichfield and shown coloured Yellow on the Plan B and being land within limits and shown on Replacement Sheet 1-13;  \r\n“Replacement Sheet” means the extracts of the deposited plans identified and referred to in clause 53(2) of the Bill.\r\n\r\n","BT Utility Diversion\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to John Uffold, assurance 2","2019-08-15","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.15","N/A","HoL/0028","David and Sian Froggatt","1. Unless otherwise agreed (not to be unreasonably withheld) with the Petitioner, during the construction of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to maintain access to the Property for the access and egress of emergency vehicles.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Petitioners” means David and Sian Froggatt\r\n“the Secretary of State” means the Secretary of State for Transport.\r\n“Petitioners’ Property” means Agricultural land, hedgerows and access track (Pipe Lane) at Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, WS15 3JL.","Emergency access\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tony Rimmer, assurance 1","2019-10-16","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.16","N/A","HoL/0028","David and Sian Froggatt","3.1 The Secretary of State will promote an Additional Provision to enable the construction of the Haul Route on an alternative alignment to the alignment currently proposed under AP1 and shown on the AP1 Plans (the “Alternative Haul Route Alignment”).\r\n3.2 Subject to the successful promotion of an Additional Provision to enable the construction of the Alternative Haul Route Alignment and any further approvals required under Schedule 17 to the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use Schedule 15 temporary possession powers to temporarily occupy the land required for the Alternative Haul Route Alignment, subject to condition in 3.3, in order to:\r\n3.2.1 construct the Alternative Haul Route Alignment;\r\n3.2.2 use the Alternative Haul Route Alignment only in connection with the construction of the Proposed Scheme; and \r\n3.2.3 to remove the Alternative Haul Route Alignment following the completion of such construction. \r\n3.3 The conditions referred to in 3.2 are that: \r\n3.3.1 the temporary possession of land to construct the Alternative Haul Route Alignment would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n3.3.2 the Petitioners agree that any claim for compensation in respect of land which is to be occupied for the Alternative Haul Route Alignment and is not permanently required for the operation of the Proposed Scheme will not exceed the overall cost to the project as compared with outright acquisition of the land based upon its existing use as a mixed farming business.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“Haul Route” means the haul route and maintenance access proposed to be constructed on the Petitioners’ Property under the Proposed Scheme;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; \r\n“the Petitioners” means David and Sian Froggatt\r\n","Haul Route\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tony Rimmer, assurance 3","2019-10-16","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.17","N/A","HoL/0028","David and Sian Froggatt","7. In order to control any potential effects on water supply and contamination as a result of construction activities on the Petitioner’s Fish Farming Activity, the Secretary of State will instruct the nominated undertaker to apply the measures set out in section 16 entitled \"Water Resources and Flood Risk\" of the Code of Construction Practice paying particular attention to sections 16.1\"Surface Water and groundwater management - general provisions.\r\n\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Code of Construction Practice” means the Code of Construction Practice that is prepared for the Bill to control the construction of the Proposed Scheme and that is finalised on Royal Assent\r\nof the Bill;\r\n\r\n“the Petitioners” means David and Sian Froggatt;\r\n\r\n“the Petitioners’ Fish Farming Activity” means the Quinton Orchard Fish Farm carried out at the Petitioner’s Property.\r\n“Petitioners’ Property” means Agricultural land, hedgerows and access track (Pipe Lane) at Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, WS15 3JL","Water resources and flood risk\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tony Rimmer, assurance 7","2019-10-16","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.18","N/A","HoL/0028","David and Sian Froggatt"," In accordance with the provisions of the draft Code of Construction Practice, the Nominated Undertaker at its own expense shall provide appropriate fencing around the boundary of the proposed construction sites indicatively shown edged red on the plan attached at Appendix 2, so to secure those construction sites and prevent pedestrian movement between those construction working areas and Quintons Orchard farm.\r\n\r\nIn these Assurances:  \r\n \r\n“Code of Construction Practice” means the draft Code of Construction Practice as appended to Volume 5 of the High Speed Rail (West Midlands to Crewe) Environmental Statement; \r\n\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as further defined by the Bill.","Fencing","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to James Del Mar, section 2, assurance 1","2020-09-16","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.19","N/A","HoL/0028","David and Sian Froggatt","1.1 Acknowledging the Petitioners’ preference for the diversion to the Petitioners’ Property to be from Pipe Lane along Mavesyn Ridware Footpath 38 Accommodation Overbridge to Quinton’s Orchard Farm, the Secretary of State will, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioners with regard to the potential relocation of a BT Utility Diversion to Bentley Hall Farm and the Petitioners’ Property as set out in AP2-001-105. \r\n\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are:- \r\n\r\n1.2.1 the nominated undertaker obtaining any required consents from any third party landholders and subject to the agreement of BT; \r\n\r\n1.2.2 the Petitioner making all required land available in order to facilitate any potential relocation of the BT Utility Diversion arising from this assurance; \r\n\r\n1.2.3 BT consenting, and subsequently acting expeditiously (if required) to use their statutory powers as a statutory utility undertaker, to facilitate the BT Utility Diversion and to pay compensation for land acquired or used for the BT Utility Diversion in accordance with the Compensation Code; and \r\n\r\n1.2.4 The relocation of the BT Utility Diversion not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme and can be accommodated within the construction programme for the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“Additional Provision” means amendments to the Bill introduced following deposit of the Bill into Parliament;\r\n“AP2” means the Additional Provision to the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 8 February 2019;\r\n“AP2-001-105” means the drawings with corresponding references as set out in the environmental statement submitted with AP2;\r\n“Bentley Hall Farm” located in Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3HX;\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands- Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“BT” means British Telecommunications plc;\r\n\"BT Utility Diversion\" means the diversion of the BT Openreach overhead telecommunications line as set out in AP2-001-105;\r\n“Compensation Code” means the code of statue and case law determining the compensation to be paid to landowners and occupiers where land or rights in land are authorised to be compulsorily acquired under the Bill;\r\n“Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme  \r\n“the Petitioners” means David Froggatt and Sian Froggatt of Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Pipe Lane, Blithbury, Rugeley, WS15 3JL;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n\r\n\r\n","BT Utility Diversion\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight  (HS2) to James Del Mar, section 3, assurance 1","2020-09-16","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.20","N/A","HoL/0028","David and Sian Froggatt","1.1\tThe Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to grant a right of access over the Accommodation Overbridge along such part of North Drive as is shaded red on Plan 42 (13) (“the Overbridge Route”) to the Petitioners and any successors in title. \r\n1.2\tAccess along the Overbridge Route will also be required:\r\n1.2.1\tfor construction, maintenance and operation of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.2\tby such landowners as require access to the land on which the HS2 balancing pond shown on Plan 42 (13) is situated and their successors in title; and\r\n1.2.3\tsuch other parties as in time may reasonably require access to be granted by the Nominated Undertaker, provided that the Nominated Undertaker has first consulted on the grant of such access with the Petitioners. \r\n“In these Assurances:  \r\n “Accommodation Overbridge” means the Mavesyn Ridware Footpath 38 Accommodation Overbridge forming part of Work No.16 as shown indicatively on plan CT-06-205 attached at Appendix 1;\r\n“Plan P42 (13)” means the plan showing proposed access over the Accommodation Overbridge and along North Drive as appended to this assurance letter;\r\n","North Drive Access\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight  (HS2) to James Del Mar, assurance 1","2020-09-23","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.21","N/A","HoL/0028","David and Sian Froggatt","The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to construct the Accommodation Overbridge so that it has a width of no less than 8.5m between the parapets, separates pedestrians from vehicular traffic, and takes into account any other reasonable requirements of the Petitioners in the design of the Accommodation Overbridge. This shall include, but not be limited to, the specification of agricultural vehicles used by the Petitioners in the operation of their farming business. \r\nIn these Assurances:  \r\n “Accommodation Overbridge” means the Mavesyn Ridware Footpath 38 Accommodation Overbridge forming part of Work No.16 as shown indicatively on plan CT-06-205 attached at Appendix 1","Accommodation Overbridge\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to James Del Mar, assurance 2","2020-09-23","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.22","N/A","HoL/0028","David and Sian Froggatt","1.1 The nominated undertaker, liaising with representatives of the Petitioners and subject to being granted all rights of access and being provided with any necessary consents for carrying out monitoring and other activities, shall ensure that, as soon as reasonably practicable and prior to the commencement of the works related to the construction of the Proposed Scheme within the vicinity of the Petitioners’ Property, a risk assessment (“the Risk Assessment”) is carried out by competent specialists of the potential impacts in relation to noise and vibration effects, potential dust effects, for potential biosecurity effects, and for potential water contamination effects from the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme on the Petitioners’ Fish Farm Activity, as well as any potential impact on the maintenance of the security of the Petitioners’ Fish Farm during  the construction of the Proposed Scheme. The Risk Assessment may be revised, amended and updated as the construction programme progresses, and further design works are carried out.  \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Petitioners’ Fish Farming Activity” means the Quinton’s Orchard Fish Farm activity carried out on the Petitioners’ Property and “the Petitioner’s Fish Farm” means the location(s) on the Petitioner’s Property where such activity is carried out;\r\n","Risk Assessment\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to James Del Mar, assurance 1 ","2020-09-23","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.23","N/A","HoL/0028","David and Sian Froggatt","2.1\tIf the Risk Assessment identifies the potential for harmful effects on the Petitioners’ Fish Farm Activity, the Nominated Undertaker will develop an action plan (“Action Plan”) and will seek to reduce air quality impacts and any potential effects on water supply and contamination and potential impacts on the maintenance of security identified in the Risk Assessment. The Action Plan may include but will not necessarily be limited to the identification of control measures to be adopted, a monitoring regime (including the identification of trigger levels) and associated control mechanisms.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Petitioners’ Fish Farming Activity” means the Quinton’s Orchard Fish Farm activity carried out on the Petitioners’ Property and “the Petitioner’s Fish Farm” means the location(s) on the Petitioner’s Property where such activity is carried out;\r\n","Action Plan\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to James Del Mar, assurance 2","2020-09-23","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C25.24","N/A","HoL/0028","David and Sian Froggatt","3.1   Working Group Objective\r\nAn appropriate representation of the Promoter and the Petitioners will form a working group to collaborate and review the implementation of the Action Plan and be consulted on monitoring data and the implementation of any control mechanisms. \r\n3.2   Working Group Duration\r\nThe working group is to be established on or before 31 December 2020 and cease at the ‘Testing and Commissioning Phase’.\r\n3.3   Working Group Meetings\r\nThe working group shall meet at least once every quarter with additional meetings scheduled as necessary. The meetings will be chaired by the Head of Early Works.\r\n3.4   Working Group Terms of Reference\r\nThe members agree to develop a term of reference for the working group as soon as reasonably practicable.\r\n","Working Group\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight  (HS2) to James Del Mar, assurance 3 ","2020-09-23","Assurance","Quinton’s Orchard Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C26","Astley, George and Brenda ","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C26.1","N/A","HoC/0166","George and Brenda Astley","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 Seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 Seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George and Brenda Astley, assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Blythe House Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QQ ","Lichfield District"]
["C26.2","N/A","HoC/0166","George and Brenda Astley","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George and Brenda Astley, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Blythe House Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QQ ","Lichfield District"]
["C26.3","N/A","HoC/0166","George and Brenda Astley","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George and Brenda Astley, assurance 3\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Blythe House Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QQ ","Lichfield District"]
["C26.4","N/A","HoC/0166","George and Brenda Astley","1.1 The Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Green Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the condition in paragraph 1.2 below.\r\n1.2 The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to:\r\n(a) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the ecological mitigation, which was provided on a precautionary basis, can be removed from the Proposed Scheme design, or reduced in extent, without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill.\r\n(b) the Secretary of State being of the view that the removal of the ecological mitigation can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n(c) is subject to consent from local planning authority.","Removal/Reduction of Ecological Mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George and Brenda Astley, assurance 1 \r\n","2018-06-12","Assurance","Blythe House Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QQ ","Lichfield District"]
["C26.5","N/A","HoC/0166","George and Brenda Astley","1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in exercising the powers under the Bill to maintain vehicular and pedestrian access to Blythe House Farm, Hamstall Ridware, Nr Rugeley, Staffordshire WS15 3QQ by any of the highways marked red, green and blue on the attached Plan so far as reasonably practicable during construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n2. If the access referred to in paragraph 1 is to be restricted the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in exercising the powers under the Bill to liaise with the Petitioner to ensure that any disruption is reduced so far as reasonably practicable","Access to Blythe House Farm","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George and Brenda Astley, assurance 1 and 2 \r\n","2018-06-18","Assurance","Blythe House Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QQ ","Lichfield District"]
["C26.6","N/A","HoC/0166","George and Brenda Astley","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale, (Bagshaws LLP), Annex A \r\n","2019-07-08","Assurance","Blythe House Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3QQ ","Lichfield District"]
["C27","Prince, John Stanley","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C27.1","N/A","HoC/0052","John Stanley Prince","1.1.Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 Seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 Seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to John Stanley Prince, assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Princes Farms, Burton-on-Trent, DE13 7JG","Stafford Borough"]
["C27.2","N/A","HoC/0052","John Stanley Prince","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3.The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction.  Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n2.5. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.6. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.7 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to John Stanley Prince, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Princes Farms, Burton-on-Trent, DE13 7JG","Stafford Borough"]
["C27.3","N/A","HoC/0052","John Stanley Prince","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to John Stanley Prince, assurance 3\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Princes Farms, Burton-on-Trent, DE13 7JG","Stafford Borough"]
["C27.4","N/A","HoC/0052","John Stanley Prince","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A\r\n","2019-07-08","Assurance","Princes Farms, Burton-on-Trent, DE13 7JG","Stafford Borough"]
["C28","Grundy, Gillian and Helen Fowell and Patricia Rothery","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C28.1","N/A","HoC/0173","Gillian Grundy, Helen Fowell and Patricia Rothery","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Gillian Grundy, Helen Fowell and Patricia Rothery, assurance 1\r\n","2018-06-05","Assurance","1 Alrewas Road, Burton-on-Trent, DE13 7HW and Rose House, Rugeley, WS15 3BN","Stafford Borough"]
["C28.2","N/A","HoC/0173","Gillian Grundy, Helen Fowell and Patricia Rothery","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Gillian Grundy, Helen Fowell and Patricia Rothery, assurance 2\r\n","2018-06-05","Assurance","1 Alrewas Road, Burton-on-Trent, DE13 7HW and Rose House, Rugeley, WS15 3BN","Stafford Borough"]
["C28.3","N/A","HoC/0173","Gillian Grundy, Helen Fowell and Patricia Rothery","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Gillian Grundy, Helen Fowell and Patricia Rothery, assurance 3\r\n","2018-06-05","Assurance","1 Alrewas Road, Burton-on-Trent, DE13 7HW and Rose House, Rugeley, WS15 3BN","Stafford Borough"]
["C28.4","N/A","HoC/0173","Gillian Grundy, Helen Fowell and Patricia Rothery","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notice of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","1 Alrewas Road, Burton-on-Trent, DE13 7HW and Rose House, Rugeley, WS15 3BN","Stafford Borough"]
["C29","Ellis, Timothy and Anthony","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C29.1","N/A","HoC/0177","Timothy and Anthony Ellis","1.1.Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 Seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 Seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Timothy and Anthony Ellis, assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Bentley Hall Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, WS15 3HX","Lichfield District"]
["C29.2","N/A","HoC/0177","Timothy and Anthony Ellis","2.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n2.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n2.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Timothy and Anthony Ellis, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Bentley Hall Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, WS15 3HX","Lichfield District"]
["C29.3","N/A","HoC/0177","Timothy and Anthony Ellis","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consider during detailed design the introduction of an earthwork bund up to 3 meters in height, in the Green Land, as shown indicatively in Appendix 1.\r\nThis assurance is subject to the following conditions:\r\ni.  the proposed change not prejudicing compliance with any aspect of the Environmental Minimum Requirements;\r\nii. the proposed change not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\niii. the proposed change not requiring the acquisition of any land outside of the Petitioner’s land ownership.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\"the Green Land” means the land edged green on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being plot 81 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-13 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill","Earthwork bund\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Timothy and Anthony Ellis\r\n","2018-06-01","Assurance","Bentley Hall Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, WS15 3HX","Lichfield District"]
["C29.4","N/A","HoC/0177","Timothy and Anthony Ellis","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP)\r\n","2019-07-08","Assurance","Bentley Hall Farm, Blithbury, Rugeley, WS15 3HX","Lichfield District"]
["C30","Ridley, Eric and Paul","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C30.1","N/A","HoC/0162","Eric and Paul Ridley","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2.  The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1  Seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2  Seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3.  In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Eric and Paul Ridley, assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Hadley Gate Field Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HT","Lichfield District"]
["C30.2","N/A","HoC/0162","Eric and Paul Ridley","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4  The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Agricultural soils\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Eric and Paul Ridley, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Hadley Gate Field Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HT","Lichfield District"]
["C30.3","N/A","HoC/0162","Eric and Paul Ridley","3.1.   Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2   Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3    Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Eric and Paul Ridley, assurance 3\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","Hadley Gate Field Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HT","Lichfield District"]
["C30.4","N/A","HoC/0162","Eric and Paul Ridley","1.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n\r\n1.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n\r\n1.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n\r\n1.4 Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n\r\n1.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n\r\n1.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Eric and Paul Ridley, assurance 1\r\n","2018-06-12","Assurance","Hadley Gate Field Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HT","Lichfield District"]
["C30.5","N/A","HoC/0162","Eric and Paul Ridley","1.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, to remove the width of the landscape mitigation planting proposed to be located within the Blue Land, and shown indicatively in blue on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] deposited in the Additional Provision (March 2018), and introduce an area of hedgerow habitat creation proposed to be located within the Green Land, and shown indicatively in green on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] deposited in the Additional Provision (March 2018);\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n(i) the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1 does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill and as updated by the Supplementary Environmental Statement;\r\n(ii) the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1 does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n(iii) the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1 receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands- Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017;\r\n“the Blue Land” means the land hatched in blue on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plots 182 and 168 the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Replacement Sheet Nos. 1-14 of the plans deposited in the Additional Provision (March 2018);\r\n“the Green Land” means the land hatched green on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plots 182 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Replacement Sheet Nos. 1-14 of the plans deposited in the Additional Provision (March 2018), being an area of proposed hedgerow habitat creation;\r\n","Landscape mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Eric and Paul Ridley, assurance 1\r\n","2018-06-14","Assurance","Hadley Gate Field Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HT","Lichfield District"]
["C30.7","N/A","HoC/0162","Eric and Paul Ridley","Except where vehicular access over Bishton Lane may be restricted in connection with the construction of works authorised by the Bill to re-align Bishton Lane, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker during the construction of the Proposed Scheme to use reasonable endeavours to provide the Petitioners with such vehicular access over Bishton Lane as may be reasonably required by the Petitioners for the purposes of accessing the existing manure storage facility located at Moreton Farm.\r\n\r\n","Vehicular Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Eric and Paul Ridley\r\n","2018-06-19","Assurance","Hadley Gate Field Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HT","Lichfield District"]
["C30.6","N/A","HoC/0162","Eric and Paul Ridley","1.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the condition in paragraph 1.2, to use reasonable endeavours to form and layout a permanent means of vehicular access from the Hadley Gate Lane Diversion to the Petitioners existing agricultural land holding located adjacent to the Hadley Gate Lane Diversion.\r\n1.2 The condition referred to in paragraph 1.1 is the nominated undertaker securing all necessary consents and approvals for the provision of the access described in paragraph 1.1 from the local highway authority under Schedule 4 of the Bill.","Vehicular Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Eric and Paul Ridley\r\n","2018-06-29","Assurance","Hadley Gate Field Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HT","Lichfield District"]
["C30.8","N/A","HoC/0162","Eric and Paul Ridley","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Hadley Gate Field Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HT","Lichfield District"]
["C31","Phillips, Andrew","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C31.1","N/A","HoC/0171","Andrew Phillips","If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to The Granary, Shaw Lane, Riley Hill, Staffordshire WS13 8HW and the Bromley Hayes Garden Centre, Shaw Lane, Riley Hill, Lichfield, WS13 8HW, the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Property” means The Granary, Shaw Lane, Riley Hill, Staffordshire WS13 8HW and Bromley Hayes Garden Centre, Shaw Lane, Riley Hill, Lichfield, WS13 8HW\r\n","Exercise of Schedule 15 Powers","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew Phillips, assurance 1 \r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","The Granary, Shaw Lane, Riley Hill, Staffordshire WS13 8HW and the Bromley Hayes Garden Centre, Shaw Lane, Riley Hill, Lichfield, WS13 8HW","Lichfield District"]
["C31.2","N/A","HoC/0171","Andrew Phillips","1.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n1.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notice periods relating to temporary possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew Phillips, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-25","Assurance","The Granary, Shaw Lane, Riley Hill, Staffordshire WS13 8HW and the Bromley Hayes Garden Centre, Shaw Lane, Riley Hill, Lichfield, WS13 8HW","Lichfield District"]
["C31.3","N/A","HoC/0171","Andrew Phillips","1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to:\r\n(i) remove the extent of the hedgerow habitat creation in the Blue Land; and\r\n(ii) reinstate the lost boundary in the Blue Land, equivalent to that which already exists.\r\n2. 1(i) above is subject to approval by the local planning authority of the removal of the extent of the hedgerow habitat mitigation under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n”the Blue Land” means the land edged blue on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 81 in the Parish of Kings Bromley in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-05 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill.","Hedgerows","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew Phillips, assurances 1 and 2\r\n","2018-05-31","Assurance","Bromley Hayes Garden Centre, Shaw Lane, Riley Hill, Lichfield, WS13 8HW","Lichfield District"]
["C31.4","N/A","HoC/0171","Andrew Phillips","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in exercising the powers under the Bill not to prevent access to the Bromley Hayes Garden Centre, Shaw Lane, Riley Hill, Lichfield, WS13 8HW in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances.","Access to the Bromley Hayes Garden Centre","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew Phillips \r\n","2018-06-01","Assurance","Bromley Hayes Garden Centre, Shaw Lane, Riley Hill, Lichfield, WS13 8HW","Lichfield District"]
["C31.5","N/A","HoC/0171","Andrew Phillips","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP), Annex A\r\n","2019-07-08","Assurance","Bromley Hayes Garden Centre, Shaw Lane, Riley Hill, Lichfield, WS13 8HW","Lichfield District"]
["C32","Collier, Andrew, Pauline and Mark","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C32.1","N/A ","HoC/0028","Andrew, Pauline and Mark Collier","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew, Pauline and Mark Collier assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Ingestre Manor Farm\r\nStafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C32.2","N/A","HoC/0028","Andrew, Pauline and Mark Collier","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requiements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament\r\n","Agricultural soils\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew, Pauline and Mark Collier assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Ingestre Manor Farm\r\nStafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C32.3","N/A","HoC/0028","Andrew, Pauline and Mark Collier","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew, Pauline and Mark Collier assurance 3\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Ingestre Manor Farm\r\nStafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C32.4","N/A","HoC/0028","Andrew, Pauline and Mark Collier","1.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n1.2  The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n1.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n1.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew, Pauline and Mark Collier, assurance 1 \r\n","2018-06-20","Assurance","Ingestre Manor Farm\r\nStafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C32.5","N/A","HoC/0028","Andrew, Pauline and Mark Collier","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson & Parry), Annex A\r\n","2019-07-08","Assurance","Ingestre Manor Farm\r\nStafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C33","Parrott, Anthony, Jane and Sam","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C33.1","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","1.1.Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne(HS2) to Anthony, Jane, Sam and Sarah Parrott, assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.2","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\t\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3.The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne(HS2) to Anthony, Jane, Sam and Sarah Parrott, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.3","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3 .Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Anthony, Jane, Sam and Sarah Parrott, assurance 3\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.4","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","5.1. If prior to the giving of notice of entry or prior to the notice of vesting under a general vesting declaration to acquire land permanently (whether or not before Royal Assent) the Petitioner identifies suitable land for the relocation of an agricultural building (whether within or outside Petitioner’s ownership) and the Petitioner provides to the Secretary of State a detailed course of action substantiating the relocation, the Secretary of State will confirm whether or not he accepts that the land identified and evidence supporting the course of action provides a reasonable basis for the Petitioner’s claim for compensation in the event that the Bill receives Royal Assent and the Secretary of State exercises his powers of compulsory acquisition.\r\n","Identification of land for the relocation of agricultural buildings\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Anthony, Jane, Sam and Sarah Parrott, assurance 5\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.5","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","6.1.The Promoter acknowledges that proper professional costs and fees reasonably incurred by the Petitioner for the purposes of seeking to identify suitable alternative premises at which to relocate an agricultural building which is subject to the power of compulsory acquisition under the Bill, will form a Head of Claim as part of any disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of that land under the Bill.","Professional costs and fees","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Anthony, Jane, Sam and Sarah Parrott, assurance 6\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.6","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","1.1 The Secretary of State will require not to exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Green Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the condition in paragraph 1.2 below.\r\n1.2 The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to:\r\n(a) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the ecological mitigation, which was provided on a precautionary basis, can be removed from the Proposed Scheme design without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n(b) the Secretary of State Promoter being of the view that the removal of the ecological mitigation can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n(c) is subject to consent from local planning authority\r\n“In this assurance:\r\n“the Green Land” means the land coloured green on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 94 in the Parish of Colwich in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet No. 1-23 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill.\r\n","Removal of precautionary great crested newt mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Anthony, Jane, Sam and Sarah Parrott, assurance 1\r\n","2018-06-08","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.7","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","1.1. The Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with the Petitioner, where a business case is approved and where it relates to a relocation necessary for the Petitioner’s farm business in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Promoter of land required for that business, such agreement to provide that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Promoter being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured.\r\n\r\n","Relocation Matters","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Anthony, Jane, Sam and Sarah Parrott,  assurance 1\r\n","2018-06-11","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.8","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","2.1. The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of a relocation necessary for the Petitioner’s farm business required as a result of the impact of the project on the holding where the relocation is either:\r\n2.1.1. to be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or \r\n2.1.2 \tthe subject of a separate application for planning consent. \r\n2.2.The assistance referred to in paragraph 2.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for the relocation of farm buildings. \r\n2.3.Paragraph 2.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 2.1., a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 2.1. and required to give effect to the relocation of farm buildings, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill. \r\n2.4.Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 2.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper C7: Business Relocation.\r\n2.5. In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.\r\n\r\n","Relocation of agricultural buildings\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Anthony, Jane, Sam and Sarah Parrott, assurance 2\r\n","2018-06-11","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.9","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1\r\n","2019-02-13","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.10","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","2.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage  \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2\r\n","2019-02-13","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.11","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport","Various","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","2019-03-01","Undertaking","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.11_01","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","*see undertaking for definitions*\r\n\r\n2.1 Subject to the conditions specified in para 3 below, the Secretary of State undertakes to require the Nominated Undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to:\r\n2.1.1 Construct the Alternative Overbridge;\r\n2.1.2 Provide the Accommodation Access Track; and\r\n2.1.2 Effect the Permanent Bridleway Diversion.\r\n2.2\tFor the avoidance of doubt, if the conditions set out in para 3 below are not fulfilled the undertaking in para 2.1 above shall not come into force.\r\n","Conditions","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott, clauses 2.1 - 2.2","2019-03-01","Undertaking","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.11_02","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","*see undertaking for definitions*\r\n\r\n3.1 The undertaking in paragraph 2.1 above is subject to the following conditions:\r\n\r\n3.2 The Owners cooperating with the Secretary of State and/or the Nominated Undertaker on all matters subject of this Undertaking; and\r\n\r\n3.3\tIf requested to do so, the Owners agreeing to the sale of land required for the construction of the Alternative Overbridge at the time and on terms agreed with the Secretary of State.\r\n3.4\tThe Secretary of State being satisfied that the total costs associated with the construction of the Alternative Overbridge, the Accommodation Access Track and the Permanent Bridleway Diversion does not exceed the total overall costs of the construction of Work 31.\r\n3.5\tAll consents required for the construction of the Alternative Bridge having been obtained by the Promoter at the Promoter's cost in time to fit with the programme of construction of the Authorised Works without causing delay or interruption to the construction of the Proposed Scheme\r\n3.6\tIn the event that the construction of the Alternative Bridge adversely affects the area currently designated for mitigation planting under the Bill on the Owners’ property – the Owners agreeing with the Secretary of State to:\r\n(i)\tidentify a suitable alternative site (“alternative planting mitigation site”) to accommodate mitigation planting on the Owners’ Land;\r\n(ii)\tprovide all necessary accesses to and egresses from the alternative planting mitigation site for the purpose of inspection and maintenance\r\n(iii)\teither agreeing to sell the alternative planting mitigation site to the Secretary of State on acceptable terms or entering into an agreement with the Secretary of State and/or the Nominated Undertaker regarding maintenance of the  alternative planting mitigation site; and\r\n3.7\tProvided that the construction of the Alternative Bridge does not adversely impact on the construction programme of the Proposed Scheme and the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n3.8\tProvided that effecting the Permanent Bridleway Diversion Order does not adversely impact on the construction programme of the Proposed Scheme and the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.","Alternative Overbridge","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott, clauses 3.1 -3.8","2019-03-01","Undertaking","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.12","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","1.1\tThe Promoter shall require the nominated undertaker to consult with the Owners during the detailed design of the Accommodation Crossings and consider so far as reasonably practicable the reasonable requirements of the Owners when determining the specifications of the Accommodation Crossings.\r\n1.2\tIn considering the Owners’ requirements the Promoter shall be satisfied that they\r\n1.2.1\tdo not result in any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement;\r\n1.2.2\tdo not adversely impact on the construction programme of the accommodation works or the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.3\tare within the limits and powers of the Bill, excepting the specification of any Accommodation Crossing which is the subject of a separate agreement between the Owners and the Promoter which allows for the relocation of that Accommodation Crossing for which consents and permissions additional to those provided for in the Bill are required;\r\n1.2.4 do not in all other respects affect the safe, economic and timely delivery of the Proposed Scheme.  \r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Owners” means Anthony Parrott, Jane Parrott, Sam Parrott and Sarah Parrott;\r\n\r\n“Accommodation Crossings” means the Accommodation Overbridge and the Accommodation Underbridge ","Crossings specification\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 1\r\n","2019-04-01","Assurance","The Accommodation Overbridge and the Accommodation Underbridge at Tithe Barn Farm, Stafford, ST17 0BX\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.13","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","2.1 The Promoter shall require the nominated undertaker during detailed design to review the use of local placement, and following such review will consider whether \r\n2.1.1 it is reasonably practicable to reduce the size of local placement on Area A; and \r\n2.1.2 use in the first instance Area B instead of Area A for local placement. \r\n2.2 The use of Area B for local placement shall be subject to \r\n2.2.1 the Promoter being satisfied that it does not result in any new of different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement;\r\n2.2.2 any requirements of the local planning authority for the approval of the construction and restoration of Area A and Area B under Schedule 17 of the Bill being satisfied;\r\n2.2.3\tthe local placement being consistent with the safe, timely and economic delivery of any other works for the Proposed Scheme connected with, or within the vicinity of, Area B\r\n2.2.4 the Owners providing any necessary access for the purpose of local placement on Area B\r\n2.2.5 the Owners entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides \r\n- for local placement of excavated materials to take place in Area B subject to such conditions as the nominated undertaker requires\r\n- that Area B need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity and local placement on Area B.\r\n2.3 The Promoter shall require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Owners to discuss possible regrading and/or restoration of Area A to a condition suitable for its former use or to a different use agreed with the Owners.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“local placement” means an area designated for placing of surplus excavated material; \r\n“local placement area A” means the local placement area shown coloured blue on plan 1;\r\n“local placement area B” means the local placement area shown coloured red on plan 2;\r\n“Owners” means Anthony Parrott, Jane Parrott, Sam Parrott and Sarah Parrott\r\n\r\n","Local placement\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 2\r\n","2019-04-01","Assurance","Local placement areas A and B shown coloured blue on plan 1 and red on plan 2\r\n attached to this assurance","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.14","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","3.1\tProvided that the protected strip does not include plots AP-15 and AP2-18 or any part or parts of them the Secretary of State shall not exercise the compulsory acquisition powers conferred in the Bill in relation to plots numbered AP2-15 and AP2-18.\r\n3.2\tIn the event that the protective strip includes part or parts of plots AP-15 and AP2-18 the Secretary of State shall only exercise the compulsory acquisition powers conferred in the Bill in relation to such part or parts of plots AP2-15 and AP2-18 which form part of the protective strip. \r\n3.3\tSubject to the condition in paragraph 3.5 below the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to make the orange land available and accessible to the Owners for the purpose for which the Owners use that land during the construction of Work 32.\r\n3.4\tProvided that the construction of Work 32 has been completed and subject to the condition in para 3.5 below, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to make the pink land available and accessible to the Owners for the purpose for which the Owners use that land during the construction of Work 33.\r\n3.5\tThe condition referred to in paragraphs 3.3 and 3.4 is that the availability and use of the orange land or pink land (as relevant) does not prejudice the safe, economic and timely delivery of the Proposed Scheme. \r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Plots AP2-15 and AP2-18” means plots of land in the Parish of Colwich shown on plan 2;\r\n“Protected strip” means a strip of land 25 metres in width on either side of Work 32 required for the purpose of carrying out Work 32;\r\n“Orange land” means the land shown coloured orange on plan 2;\r\n“Owners” means Anthony Parrott, Jane Parrott, Sam Parrott and Sarah Parrott;\r\n“Work 32 and Work 33” means a diversion of a gas main as further described in Schedule 1 of the Bill;\r\n “Pink land” means the land shown coloured pink on plan 2;\r\n“Plan(s)” means the plan(s) attached to this assurance [attached to assurance letter sent to beneficiary]\r\n","Land take for the purpose of utilities diversion on the Owners’ Land\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 3\r\n","2019-04-01","Assurance","AP2-15 and AP2-18 in the Parish of Colwich shown on plan 2 attached to the assurance including the land coloured pink and orange. \r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.15","N/A","HoC/0038","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","4.1\tThe Secretary of State shall use reasonable endeavours to promote the Footpath Diversion Order and subject to the Order being confirmed the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to implement the Footpath Diversion.  \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n “Footpath Diversion” means the diversion of Footpath Colwich 54 as [shown indicatively with a pink line on plan 3. “Footpath Diversion Order” means an order to effect the Footpath Diversion, including powers to ensure that all parts of the diverted Footpath Colwich 54 between points X and Y on Plan 3 are stopped up;\r\n“plan(s)” means the plan(s) attached to this assurance [attached to assurance letter sent to beneficiary]\r\n\r\n\r\n","Alternative alignment of Footpath 54\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 4\r\n","2019-04-01","Assurance","Footpath Colwich 54 ","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.16","N/A","HoC/0038 & AP2/0028","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","1.1 \tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to construct an Accommodation Overbridge capable of accommodating vehicles permitted for use on a public highway and to consider when carrying out detailed design of the Accommodation Overbridge the Petitioner’s reasonable requests to accommodate vehicles or undertake operations on or over the Accommodation Overbridge which exceed the Maximum Authorised Weight or the Overall Vehicle Dimensions.\r\n1.2\tSubject to the conditions in 1.3, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to construct the Accommodation Underbridge with the dimensions of at least 4.5 metres wide by 4.25 metres high to accommodate the Petitioner’s use of vehicles that are within the 1986 Regulations and the 1998 Regulations specifications.\r\n1.3\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 and 1.2 are:\r\n1.3.1\tthe Petitioner informs the nominated undertaker of any required vehicular use over the Accommodation Overbridge which exceeds the Maximum Authorised Weight or the Overall Vehicle Dimensions as soon as possible and in any event prior to the commencement of the detailed design of the Accommodation Overbridge;\r\n1.3.2 \tthe Petitioner informs the nominated undertaker of any required vehicular use over the Accommodation Underbridge which exceeds the Overall Vehicle Dimensions within the 1986 Regulations as soon as possible and in any event prior to the completion of the detailed design of the Accommodation Underbridge;\r\n1.3.3\tthe Accommodation Crossings can be provided within the existing powers of the Bill and without the need for any additional land; \r\n1.3.4\tthe nominated undertaker concludes that any change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without adverse impact on the construction programme of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.3.5\tprovision of the Accommodation Crossings do not result in any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and\r\n1.3.6\tthe nominated undertaker concludes that any change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without prejudicing the safety, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n “1986 Regulations” means The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 as amended; \r\n “1998 Regulations” means The Road Vehicles (Authorised Weight) Regulations 1998 as amended;\r\n  “Accommodation Crossings” means the Accommodation Overbridge and the Accommodation Underbridge;\r\n“Accommodation Overbridge” means an accommodation overbridge to be constructed under the Bill and referred to as Work 31 of the Authorised Works in Schedule 1 of the Bill or an alternative overbridge to be constructed instead of Work 31 as further described in the assurance;\r\n“Accommodation Underbridge” means an accommodation bridge to be constructed under the Bill and referred to as Work 34 of the Authorised Works in Schedule 1 of the Bill;\r\n “Maximum Authorised Weight” as defined in the 1998 Regulations;\r\n “the Overall Vehicle Dimensions” as set out and defined in the 1986 Regulations namely the vehicular overall height, overall width and overall length;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Anthony, Jane, Sam and Sarah Parrott.\r\n","Accommodation Crossings\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company)","2019-05-04","Assurance","The Accommodation Overbridge and Underbridge on Tithe Barn Farm near Great Haywood","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.17","N/A","HoC/0038 & AP2/0028","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.18","N/A","HoL/0004","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","1.1.\tSubject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below the Secretary of State shall acquire the Land and Property for the purposes of the construction, operation and maintenance of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are:\r\n1.2.1.\tthe Petitioner, being the freehold owner and occupier of the Land and Property entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the acquisition of the Land and Property including the following terms:\r\n1.2.1.1.\tthe price to be paid for the Land and Property shall be assessed in accordance with the principles of the Compensation Code (or in the absence of agreement, by the price being 90% of the Secretary of State’s assessment of the acquisition price) as if assessed as an advanced payment under s.52 of the Land Compensation Act 1973. The acquisition price shall be in full and final settlement of all claims for compensation in respect of the open market value of the Land and Property to be acquired;\r\n1.2.1.2.\tin the absence of agreement between the parties, any dispute as to compensation to be referred to the Upper Tribunal;\r\n1.2.1.3.\tthe Land and Property will be acquired under the principles of the Compensation Code as set out by Section 5 of the Land Compensation Act including Rule 2 and Rule 6 with the full benefit of the Compensation Code including reference to the Upper Tribunal for non-agreed elements etc;\r\n1.2.1.4.\tthe valuation date for the Land and Property will be the earlier of the date of completion of the sale of the Land and entry by the Secretary of State on the Land under powers of entry to be conferred under the Bill;\r\n1.2.1.5.\tany claim for compensation for the acquisition of the Land and Property will be calculated under the principles of the Compensation Code and valued at the valuation date;\r\n1.2.1.6.\tthe agreement will provide for the purchase price and compensation of Land and Property to be acquired is payable subject to phased payments following completion of milestones; \r\n1.2.1.7.\tthe agreement will provide the Petitioner with the right to sublet the Property subject to the written consent of the Secretary of State;\r\n1.2.1.8.\ton completion of the sale of the Land the Secretary of State will grant a farm business tenancy of the Land on terms acceptable to the Secretary of State and including conditions set out in the schedule attached to these assurances. The agreement will include clauses agreed between the parties on the insurance of the Land and mechanisms in the event of any damage of the Land; \r\n1.2.1.9.\tthe Petitioner shall deliver vacant possession of the Land by the possession date, being the termination date of the tenancy; \r\n1.2.1.10.\tthe agreement will also include any other clauses required by the Secretary of State in order to facilitate the transfer of the Land and Property; \r\n1.2.1.11.\tthe agreement will make provision for the Secretary of State, in contemplating a disposal under the terms of the 2019 Rules, to waive the exception set out in paragraph 10 of the 2019 Rules when considering the extent to which the character of the Land may have changed as a result of the construction of the authorised works on the Land;\r\n1.2.1.12.\tthe agreement will make provision that:\r\n (i)\tthe Land need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the Land; and\r\n (ii)\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n (iii)\tprovides for the maintenance of any environmental mitigation to be provided on the Land; \r\nprovided that the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an owner-occupier of adjoining land and an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;\r\n1.2.1.13.\tthe Secretary of State shall reimburse the Petitioner for reasonable legal and agents fees incurred in dealing with the acquisition of the Property, the Farmhouse and the leaseback to the extent that these are covered by the Compensation Code.  Agents fees to be reimbursed at the rates currently agreed.\r\n1.2.2.\tNothing in these assurances shall prevent the Secretary of State serving notice under the Phase 2a Bill as enacted the Secretary of State will pay compensation in line with the Compensation Code and taking account of any payments of compensation that have actually been made to the Petitioner so there shall be no double recovery of compensation.”\r\nIn this assurances:\r\n“2019 Rules” means the Crichel Down Rules as amended in July 2019;\r\n“authorised works” means the works to be authorised under the Bill;\r\n“Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the “Bill” includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Compensation Code” means the collective term for the legal principles relating to the compensation for compulsory acquisition and deriving from Acts of Parliament and case law;\r\n“the Land” means the 34.271 hectares of agricultural land at Tithe Barn Farm, shown for the purpose of identification only edged red and shaded pink plan 1;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Anthony, Jane, Sam and Sarah Parrott t/as A G Parrott Farming;\r\n“Plan 1 and 2” means the plans annexed to these assurances;\r\n“Property” means the 116.386 square feet of land, being the residential building and its curtilage at Tithe Barn Farm, shown for the purpose of identification only edged red and shaded pink plan 2;  \r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Acquisition\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-10-22","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C33.19","N/A","HoL/0004","Anthony, Jane, Sam, and Sarah Parrott","Subject to you countersigning this letter confirming that the Petitioners will use reasonable endeavours to continue negotiations in good faith with the Promoter to complete the Documentation the Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to continue negotiations in good faith with the Petitioners to complete the Documentation as soon as reasonably practicable prior to Royal Assent for the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n “Documentation” means:-\r\na)\t A set of heads of terms making provision for the completion of the documents referred to in  b) to e) below;\r\nb)\tAn Agreement for the sale and purchase of land at Tithe Barn Lane, Great Hayward, Staffordshire ST18 0RA to be entered into by  (1) Anthony George Parrott and Jane Rosemary Parrott  and (2) Secretary of State for Transport;\r\nc)\tA Transfer Deed in form TR1 for the transfer of  the freehold land referred to in 1) above;\r\nd)\tA Farm business tenancy relating to premises at Tithe Barn Lane, Great Hayward, Staffordshire ST18 0RA to be entered into by (1) Secretary of State for Transport and (2) the Petitioners; and\r\ne)\tA Rent Deposit Deed to be entered into between (1) the Secretary of State, (2) High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd and (3) the Petitioner;\r\n","Negotiations in good faith\r\n\r\n","Letter from Simoon Knight (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2020-09-02","Assurance","Tithe Barn Farm, \r\nStafford, ST17 0BX","Stafford Borough"]
["C34","Executors for Peter Kenny (Deceased) and Mrs Val Kenny","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C34.1","N/A","HoC/0049, AP1/0029","Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny, assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Sandyford Cottage,\r\nStone, ST15 0QB","Stafford Borough"]
["C34.2","N/A","HoC/0049, AP1/0029","Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Sandyford Cottage,\r\nStone, ST15 0QB","Stafford Borough"]
["C34.3","N/A","HoC/0049, AP1/0029","Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny, assurance 3\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Sandyford Cottage,\r\nStone, ST15 0QB","Stafford Borough"]
["C34.4","N/A","HoC/0049, AP1/0029","Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny","4.1. The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the relocation of any agricultural buildings displaced for the purposes of the project where the replacement is either:\r\n4.1.1\tto be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or\r\n4.1.2. the subject of a separate application for planning consent.\r\n4.2. The assistance referred to in paragraph 10.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for relocation of an agricultural building.\r\n4.3. Paragraph 10.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 10.1., a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 10.1. and required to give effect to the relocation of an agricultural building, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill.\r\n4.4. Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 10.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Information Paper C7, Business Relocation.\r\n4.5. In this assurance and in Assurances 11 and 12, “agricultural building” includes a residential building occupied as part of an agricultural building.\r\n4.6. In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.","Relocation of agricultural buildings\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny, assurance 4\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Sandyford Cottage,\r\nStone, ST15 0QB","Stafford Borough"]
["C34.5","N/A","HoC/0049, AP1/0029","Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny","5.1. If prior to the giving of notice of entry or prior to the notice of vesting under a general vesting declaration to acquire land permanently (whether or not before Royal Assent) the Petitioner identifies suitable land for the relocation of an agricultural building (whether within or outside Petitioner’s ownership) and the Petitioner provides to the Secretary of State a detailed course of action substantiating the relocation, the Secretary of State will confirm whether or not he accepts that the land identified and evidence supporting the course of action provides a reasonable basis for the Petitioner’s claim for compensation in the event that the Bill receives Royal Assent and the Secretary of State exercises his powers of compulsory acquisition.\r\n","Identification of land for the relocation of agricultural buildings\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny, assurance 5\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Sandyford Cottage,\r\nStone, ST15 0QB","Stafford Borough"]
["C34.6","N/A","HoC/0049, AP1/0029","Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny","6.1.The Promoter acknowledges that proper professional costs and fees reasonably incurred by the Petitioner for the purposes of seeking to identify suitable alternative premises at which to relocate an agricultural building which is subject to the power of compulsory acquisition under the Bill, will form a Head of Claim as part of any disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of that land under the Bill.","Professional costs and fees\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny, assurance 6\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Sandyford Cottage,\r\nStone, ST15 0QB","Stafford Borough"]
["C34.7","N/A","HoC/0049, AP1/0029","Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny, assurance 1\r\n","2019-03-05","Assurance","Sandyford Cottage,\r\nStone, ST15 0QB","Stafford Borough"]
["C34.8","N/A","HoC/0049, AP1/0029","Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny, assurance 2 \r\n","2019-03-05","Assurance","Sandyford Cottage,\r\nStone, ST15 0QB","Stafford Borough"]
["C34.9","N/A","HoC/0049, AP1/0029","Executors of the late Peter Kenny and Mrs Val Kenny","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A\r\n","2019-07-08","Assurance","Sandyford Cottage,\r\nStone, ST15 0QB","Stafford Borough"]
["C35","Weaver, Richard and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd","N/A","N/A ",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C35.1","N/A","HoC/0051","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd ","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd, assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\nStone, ST15 0BU","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.2","N/A","HoC/0051","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd ","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\nStone, ST15 0BU","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.3","N/A","HoC/0051","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd ","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd, assurance 3\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\nStone, ST15 0BU","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.4","N/A","HoC/0051","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd ","1.1 The Secretary of State will require not to exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Green Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the condition in paragraph 1.2 below.\r\n1.2 The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to:\r\n(a) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the ecological mitigation, which was provided on a precautionary basis, can be removed from the Proposed Scheme design without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n(b) the Secretary of State being of the view that the removal of the ecological mitigation can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n(c) is subject to consent from local planning authority.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n “the Green Land” means the land coloured green on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 24 in the Parish of Stone Rural in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-35 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n","Removal of precautionary great crested newt mitigation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd, assurance 1 \r\n","2018-06-08","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\nStone, ST15 0BU","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.5","N/A","HoC/0051","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd ","\r\n1.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to modify the design of the proposed ecological mitigation to be provided pursuant to the Bill in the Blue Land for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding within the Property following the completion of construction of the Works.\r\n\r\n1.2 The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to:\r\n\r\n1.2.1 the nominated undertaker being satisfied that part of the Woodland Habitat Creation can be delivered at the Green Land in lieu of the Blue Land without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n1.2.2 the Petitioner entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the construction and ongoing maintenance of the Woodland Habitat Creation to be provided on the Green Land, subject to a management and maintenance agreement between the Petitioner and the Secretary of State;\r\n\r\n1.2.3 the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the Woodland Habitat Creation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of the Woodland Habitat Creation;\r\n\r\n1.2.4 the Green Land not being subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the construction, maintenance or the objectives of the Woodland Habitat Creation required to be provided on the Green Land; and \r\n\r\n1.2.5 all consent and approvals required from the local planning authority and third parties necessary for constructing and maintaining the woodland habitat creation on the Green Land. \r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Blue Land” means land shown for identification purposes only shaded blue and labelled ‘Blue Land’ on the attached Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n\r\n“Green Land” means land shown for identification purposes only shaded green and labelled ‘Green Land’ on the attached Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n\r\n“Woodland Habitat Creation” means the woodland creation proposed by the Bill to be created within the Blue Land [attached to beneficiary letter]; \r\n\r\n“Plan 1” means the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] bearing reference ‘C861-ARP-EV-DPL-000-056320 Rev P03’;\r\n\r\n“Plan 2” means the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] bearing reference ‘C861-ARP-EV-DPL-000-056221 Rev P05’;\r\n\r\n “Location P10” means the location on the Byway Open to All Traffic 63 (BOAT 63) shown for identification purposes only by a red circle on Plan [4] [attached to beneficiary letter]; \r\n","Ecological Mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd, assurances 1.1 and 1.2","2018-07-06","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\nStone, ST15 0BU","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.6","N/A","HoC/0051","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd ","1.3 Subject to the receipt of all necessary consents and approvals (including local highway authority approvals) and the implementation of the Proposed Scheme the Promoter will install the Bridleway Gate at Location P10 provided that such installation would not contravene any law or any third party rights.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Bridleway Gate” means a gate appropriate for installation on a bridleway;\r\n","Bridleway","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd, assurance 1.3","2018-07-06","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\nStone, ST15 0BU","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.7","N/A","HoC/0051","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd ","1.4 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the Balancing Ponds, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the detailed design of the Balancing Ponds.\r\n\r\n1.5 The nominated undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.4 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertakings and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation, seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the detailed design of the Balancing Ponds or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Property following the completion of construction of the Balancing Ponds.\r\n\r\n1.6 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the Balancing Ponds which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the Proposed Scheme but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Balancing Ponds","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd, assurances 1.4 to 1.6","2018-07-06","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\nStone, ST15 0BU","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.8","N/A","HoC/0051","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd ","1.7 The Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to position the Trackway closer to the trace of the railway provided that any such adjustment would not:\r\n\r\n1.7.1 require any modification to the Trackway which would give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications; and\r\n\r\n1.7.2 impact on the safe, timely or economic delivery or operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Trackway” means the trackway shaded pink on Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter] located at Point 5 as shown on the Petitioner’s select committee exhibit A209(6)\r\n","Trackway","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd, assurance 1.7","2018-07-06","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\nStone, ST15 0BU","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.9","N/A","HoC/0051","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd ","1.2 Where existing services on the Property would be severed as a result of the construction of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, prior to the completion of the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, to consult with the Petitioner to use reasonable endeavours to provide replacement conduits necessary for the Petitioner’s efficient management of the Property as a farm enterprise.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Property” means North Pirehill Farm, Pirehill Lane, Stone, ST15 0BU as shown edged red on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n","Provision of Conduits","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd, assurance 1.2","2018-07-10","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\nStone, ST15 0BU","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.10","N/A","HoC/0051","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd ","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd, assurance 1","2019-03-05","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\nStone, ST15 0BU","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.11","N/A","HoC/0051","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd ","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd, assurance 2","2019-03-05","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\nStone, ST15 0BU","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.12","N/A","AP2/0065\t","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd "," \r\n1.1\tIn carrying out the detailed design and construction of the Utility Diversion, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker, subject to conditions at paragraph 1.2, to use reasonable endeavours to re- route, so far as reasonably practicable and in accordance with Western Power Distribution Codes of Practice and Standards, the Utility Diversion at the Property to a route agreed with the Petitioner for the purposes of the Petitioner’s efficient management of agricultural operations at the Property.  \r\n \r\n1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n \r\n1.2.1\tthe re-routing of the Utility Diversion does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement with the Bill;\r\n \r\n1.2.2\tthe re-routing of the Utility Diversion does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n \r\n1.2.3\tthe nominated undertaker achieves all required consents for the proposed re-routing of the Utility Diversion; and\r\n\r\n1.2.4\tthe Petitioner agrees to provide the nominated undertaker with the necessary land for any alternative diversion where the land required is outside Bill limits.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Utility Diversion”  means diversion of the Western Power Distribution 11kV overhead line edged red and labelled AP2-003-102 on plans CT-05-221 and CT-06-221.\r\n","Utility Diversion","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company)","2019-04-03","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\n Stone, ST15 0BU, specifically the Western Power Distribution 11kV overhead line edged red and labelled AP2-003-102 on plans CT-05-221 and CT-06-221.","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.13","N/A","AP2/0065\t","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd "," 1.1\tDuring the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in 1.2, to use reasonable endeavours to relocate the Local Placement onto the two areas identified for Replacement Land and when doing so to reduce so far as reasonably practicable the extent of the Local Placement.\r\n1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n1.2.1\tthe nominated undertaker concludes that any change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without adverse impact on the construction programme of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.2\tthe nominated undertaker concludes that any change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.3\tcompliance with other relevant undertakings and assurances; and \r\n1.2.4\tthe proposed reconfiguration of local placement to one or both of the areas identified for Replacement Land receives any required approvals from the Local Planning Authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n1.3\tFor the avoidance of doubt, should the Replacement Land not receive the required approvals and consents as set out in paragraph 1.2, the Local Placement will be retained as currently designed in AP2 and illustrated on the attached plan. [plan attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n“In this assurance:\r\n“the Local Placement” refers to the proposed local placement illustrated brown on the attached plan;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Richard Weaver & Richard Weaver Farms Ltd;\r\n “the attached plan” means plan No. CT-05-220b, which has been marked up to illustrate the current proposed location of the Local Placement and the indicative proposed relocation of the Local Placement;\r\n “the Replacement Land” means the areas of land identified by HS2 Ltd as being suitable to relocate the Local Placement as illustrated edged in blue on the attached plan.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Local Placement","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2019-05-01","Assurance","The areas of land identified by HS2 Ltd as being suitable to relocate the Local Placement ","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.14","N/A","AP2/0065\t","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd "," 2.1\tThe nominated undertaker will, during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, review the use of the Local Placement and following such review will consider whether it is reasonably practicable to reduce the size of the Local Placement proposed to be located on the area shown indicatively on the attached plan or avoid using the site for the Local Placement entirely.\r\n2.2\tThe nominated undertaker will, during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, seek to engage with the Petitioner and will inform them of the outcome of the review of the Local Placement as described in paragraph 2.1. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Local Placement” refers to the proposed local placement illustrated brown on the attached plan;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Richard Weaver & Richard Weaver Farms Ltd.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Review of Local Placement ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-05-01","Assurance","The areas of land identified by HS2 Ltd as being suitable to relocate the Local Placement as illustrated edged in blue on the attached plan","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.15","N/A","AP2/0065\t","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd "," If the nominated undertaker confirms that the Local Placement is to be retained as illustrated on the attached plan, then the Petitioner will be provided with details of the schedule and duration of the associated HS2 Works. The nominated undertaker will continue to engage with Petitioner throughout the duration of HS2 Works and will fulfil its existing commitment to put in place an agricultural liaison service.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Local Placement” refers to the proposed local placement illustrated brown on the attached plan;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Richard Weaver & Richard Weaver Farms Ltd.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Provision of information on HS2 Works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2019-05-01","Assurance","The areas of land identified by HS2 Ltd as being suitable to relocate the Local Placement as illustrated edged in blue on the attached plan","Stafford Borough"]
["C35.16","N/A","AP2/0065\t","Richard Weaver and Richard Weaver Farms Ltd ","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","North Pirehill Farm,\r\nStone, ST15 0BU","Stafford Borough"]
["C36","Clarke, Richard Ivor and Ivor and Elizabeth Clarke","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C36.1","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Ivor Clarke and Ivor and Elizabeth Clarke, assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Brickhouse Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C36.2","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Ivor Clarke and Ivor and Elizabeth Clarke assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Brickhouse Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C36.3","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Ivor Clarke and Ivor and Elizabeth Clarke, assurance 3\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Brickhouse Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C36.4","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","1.1 The Secretary of State will require not to exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Green Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the condition in paragraph 1.2 below.\r\n1.2 The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to:\r\n(a) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the ecological mitigation, which was provided on a precautionary basis, can be removed from the Proposed Scheme design without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n(b) the Secretary of State being of the view that the removal of the ecological mitigation can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n(c) is subject to consent from local planning authority.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Green Land” means the land coloured green on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 24 in the Parish of Stone Rural in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-35 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill;","Removal of precautionary great crested newt mitigation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Ivor Clarke and Ivor and Elizabeth Clarke, assurance 1\r\n","2018-06-08","Assurance","Brickhouse Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C36.10","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","1.1 The Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Green Land for the purposes of providing woodland habitat creation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below.\r\n\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are subject to:\r\n(a) the Petitioner entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the construction and maintenance of woodland habitat creation to be provided on the Blue Land, subject to a management and maintenance agreement with the Petitioner and the Secretary of State;\r\n(b) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that woodland habitat creation;\r\n(c) the Blue Land not being subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the construction, maintenance or the objectives of the woodland habitat creation required to be provided on the Blue Land; and\r\n(d) all necessary approvals required from the local planning authority for constructing and maintaining the woodland habitat creation on the Blue Land.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n\"the Blue Land” means the land coloured blue on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plots 8 and 57 in the Parish of Hopton and Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on\r\nSheet Nos. 1-30 and 1-31 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n\r\n“the Green Land” means the land coloured green on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 8 in the Parish of Hopton and Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-30 and 1-31 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Woodland habitat creation\t","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Ivor Clarke and Ivor and Elizabeth Clarke, assurance 1","2018-06-08","Assurance","Green Land and Blue Land in the Parish of Hopton and Colton","Stafford Borough"]
["C36.5","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","1.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, to retain for use by the Petitioner the gate or similar access point from the A518, indicatively marked A on the attached Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter], as provided by the nominated undertaker in any of Land Parcels 8, 35, AP-11 and AP-13 and used for access to the Hopton South Satellite Compound.\r\n1.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\na. the Land Parcels referred to in paragraph 1.1 are within the Petitioner’s ownership; and\r\nb. the Petitioner has obtained all necessary consents for use of the gate or access point provided.\r\n1.3. In the event that the conditions in paragraph 1.2 are not met, the nominated undertaker may remove the gate or access point and reinstate the land in accordance with its obligations under the Bill.\r\n1.4. The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to the nominated undertaker concluding that leaving the access point in place would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Hopton South Satellite Compound” means the satellite construction compound shown indicatively in orange on plan CT-05-215 in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n“Land Parcel 8” means land in the Parish of Hopton and Coton identified as Plot 8 on Replacement Sheet 1-30 deposited in Parliament on 23 March 2018;\r\n“Land Parcel 35a” means land in the Parish of Hopton and Coton identified as Plot 35a on Replacement Sheets 1-30 and 1-31 deposited in Parliament on 23 March 2018;\r\n“Land Parcel AP-11” means land in the Parish of Hopton and Coton identified as Plot AP-11 on Replacement Sheet 1-30 deposited in Parliament on 23 March 2018;\r\n“Land Parcel AP-13” means land in the Parish of Hopton and Coton identified as Plot AP-13 on Replacement Sheet 1-30 deposited in Parliament on 23 March 2018.\r\n","Land Access\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Ivor Clarke and Ivor and Elizabeth Clarke, assurance 1\r\n","2018-06-17","Assurance","Access from A518, Brickhouse Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C36.6","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","\r\n 2.1. On completion of that part of the authorised works associated with the construction of the\r\nHopton North Cutting and any ancillary or related activities, the Promoter will:- \r\n2.1.1.\tgive written notice to the Petitioner of the effective completion of the construction of those works; and\r\n2.1.2.\tuse reasonable endeavours to enter into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State granting access rights if the Petitioner makes such a written request to the Promoter within three months of receipt of such notification from the Promoter.\r\n2.2. Without limitation to the terms which the Promoter may impose in response to a request made by the Petitioner under paragraph 2.1 the duration of any access rights granted by the Promoter shall only subsist for so long as the Petitioner is the owner and occupier of the relevant land and uses the relevant land for the purposes of agricultural production.\r\n2.3.\tIf –\r\n2.3.1.\ta written request from the Petitioner is not received by the Promoter within the three months period specified in paragraph 2.1, or\r\n2.3.2.\tthe Petitioner is not the owner and occupier of the relevant land when a written request is served on the Promoter under paragraph 2.1, or\r\n2.3.3.\tthe relevant land is no longer being used for agricultural purposes when a written request is served on the Promoter under paragraph 2.1, the Promoter will not be under any further obligation to consider the grant of access rights\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“relevant land” means the agricultural land shown edged in blue on the indicative Drawing (Plan 2) [attached to beneficiary letter] which is owned and occupied by the Petitioner;\r\n“Hopton North Cutting” means the section of railway cutting to be known as Hopton North Cutting and indicated on the attached indicative drawing ref CT-06-216 in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill (“the Drawing”); and\r\n“access rights” means vehicular, livestock and pedestrian access rights granted by the Promoter to the Petitioner to enable the Petitioner to pass and re-pass along the Sandon Road Maintenance Track between the junction of this track with the Public Highway and the relevant land for the purposes of farming the relevant land subject to such vehicular weight/ height/width restrictions and other relevant limitations and terms, including financial contributions by the Petitioner towards the maintenance and use of the access, as the Promoter considers appropriate to safeguard the safe, timely and economic operation and maintenance of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Rights of Access\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Ivor Clarke and Ivor and Elizabeth Clarke, assurance 2\r\n","2018-06-17","Assurance","Track on Sandon Road, Brickhouse Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C36.7","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","1.1. Subject to the successful promotion of an additional provision to the Bill which confers on the Secretary of State the power to acquire compulsorily the Alternative Site for the purposes of accommodating temporary material stockpiles and associated purposes, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to relocate the Temporary Material Stockpiles to the Alternative Site and the Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of the Bill over the green land. \r\n1.2. Subject to the assurance in paragraph 1.1, the Secretary of State will have the right to exercise powers over Land Parcel 35a for the purposes of: provision of railway infrastructure and access; provision of environmental mitigation; and worksite and access for construction, Hopton South Cutting Satellite Compound and Hopton South Cutting Transfer Node (North).\r\n1.3. The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to the nominated undertaker concluding that relocating the Temporary Material Stockpiles to the Alternative Site would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.","Temporary Material Stockpiles\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Ivor Clarke and Ivor and Elizabeth Clarke\r\n","2018-06-18","Assurance","Brickhouse Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C36.8","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","\r\n1.1 The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, to retain for permanent use by the Petitioner the gate or similar access point from the A518, indicatively marked A on the attached Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter], as provided by the nominated undertaker in any of Land Parcels 8, 35, AP-11 and AP-13 and used for access to the Hopton South Satellite Compound.\r\n\r\n1.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\na. the Land Parcels referred to in paragraph 1.1 are within the Petitioner’s ownership; and\r\nb. the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to obtain all necessary consents for permanent use of the gate or access point provided.\r\n\r\n1.3 In the event that the conditions in paragraph 1.2 are not met, the nominated undertaker may remove the gate or access point and reinstate the land in accordance with its obligations under the Bill.\r\n\r\n1.4. The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to the nominated undertaker concluding that leaving the access point in place would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Hopton South Satellite Compound” means the satellite construction compound shown indicatively in orange on plan CT-05-215 in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n“Land Parcel 8” means land in the Parish of Hopton and Coton identified as Plot 8 on Replacement Sheet 1-30 deposited in Parliament on 23 March 2018;\r\n\r\n“Land Parcel 35a” means land in the Parish of Hopton and Coton identified as Plot 35a on Replacement Sheets 1-30 and 1-31 deposited in Parliament on 23 March 2018;\r\n\r\n“Land Parcel AP-11” means land in the Parish of Hopton and Coton identified as Plot AP-11 on Replacement Sheet 1-30 deposited in Parliament on 23 March 2018;\r\n\r\n“Land Parcel AP-13” means land in the Parish of Hopton and Coton identified as Plot AP-13 on Replacement Sheet 1-30 deposited in Parliament on 23 March 2018;\r\n","Access from the A518","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Ivor Clarke and Ivor and Elizabeth Clarke, assurance 1 ","2018-11-13","Assurance","Marked 'A' on Plan 1 attached to the letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C36.9","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","2.1 The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to provide an access track over the Bund.\r\n\r\n2.2 The assurance in paragraph 2.1 is subject to the nominated undertaker concluding that providing the access track would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Bund” means the area of landscape earthworks shown edged red on Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n","Access over the Bund","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Richard Ivor Clarke and Ivor and Elizabeth Clarke, assurance 2","2018-11-13","Assurance","The area of landscape earthworks shown edged red on Plan 2, attached to the letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C36.11","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 1","2019-02-13","Assurance","Brickhouse Farm, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C36.12","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","2.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 2","2019-02-13","Assurance","Brickhouse Farm, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C36.13","N/A","HoC/0062","Richard Ivor Clarke and \r\nIvor and Elizabeth Clarke","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Brickhouse Farm, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C37","Weaver, Matthew and Matthew Weaver Ltd","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C37.1","N/A","HoC/0063","Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd, assurance 1\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Aston Pool Farm, Stafford, ST15 0BH","Stafford Borough"]
["C37.2","N/A","HoC/0063","Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd, assurance 2\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Aston Pool Farm, Stafford, ST15 0BH","Stafford Borough"]
["C37.3","N/A","HoC/0063","Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd, assurance 3\r\n","2018-05-30","Assurance","Aston Pool Farm, Stafford, ST15 0BH","Stafford Borough"]
["C37.4","N/A","HoC/0063","Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker not to exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Red Land for the purposes of providing the Ecological Mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction\r\nof the condition in paragraph 2.2 below.\r\n\r\n2.2 The assurance in paragraph 2.1 is subject to:\r\n\r\n2.2.1 the nominated undertaker being satisfied that the Ecological Mitigation can be delivered on the Green Land in lieu of the Red Land without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n2.2.2 the nominated undertaker securing any and all necessary consents for delivering the Ecological Mitigation within the Green Land within nine (9) months of Royal Assent;\r\n\r\n2.2.3 the nominated undertaker concluding that the Ecological Mitigation can be delivered within the Green Land without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n\r\n2.2.4 agreements being entered into in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the construction and ongoing maintenance of the Ecological Mitigation within the Green Land, subject to a management and maintenance agreement between the landowner and the Secretary of State;\r\n\r\n2.2.5 the Secretary of State being satisfied that the owner of the Green Land, having regard to the nature and objectives of the Ecological Mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of the Ecological Mitigation; and\r\n\r\n2.2.6 the Green Land not being subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the construction, maintenance or the objectives of the Ecological Mitigation required to be provided on the Green Land.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Ecological Mitigation” means the ecological mitigation proposed by the Bill to be created within the Red Land;\r\n\r\n“Green Land” means both the land edged green and shaded green and labelled ‘Green Land’ on the attached Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n\r\n“Plan 1” means the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] bearing reference ‘C861-ARP-EV-DPL-000-056320 Rev P03’;\r\n\r\n“Red Land” means the land edged and shaded red and labelled ‘Red Land’ on the attached Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n","Ecological Mitigation Relocation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd, assurance 2","2018-07-09","Assurance","The land edged green and shaded green and labelled ‘Green Land’ on the attached Plan 1","Stafford Borough"]
["C37.5","N/A","HoC/0063","Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd","\r\nWhere existing services on the Property would be severed as a result of the construction of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, prior to the completion of the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, to consult with the Petitioner to use reasonable endeavours to provide replacement conduits necessary for the Petitioner’s efficient management of the Property as a farm enterprise.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Property” means Aston Pool Farm, Stone, Staffordshire, ST15 0BU as shown for identification purposes only edged red on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n","Provision of Conduits","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd, assurance ","2018-07-10","Assurance","The position of the 'overbridge' shown labelled ‘Stone\r\nRural Footpath 28 Accommodation Overbridge’ on Plan 1;","Stafford Borough"]
["C37.6","N/A","HoC/0063","Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd","1.1. Subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 1.2 below, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to:\r\n\r\n1.1.1. relocate the Stone Rural Footpath 28 Accommodation Overbridge to the location shown indicatively with a line coloured pink on the attached plan;\r\n\r\n1.1.2. divert Stone Rural Footpath 28 to the location shown indicatively with a line coloured orange on the attached plan;\r\n\r\n1.1.3. create a new area of woodland habitat on the land shown indicatively coloured green on the attached plan;\r\n\r\n1.1.4. create a new area of hedgerow habitat on the land shown indicatively coloured blue on the attached plan\r\n\r\n1.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are:\r\n\r\n1.2.1. successful promotion of an Additional Provision which confers on the Secretary of State the powers to acquire compulsorily the land required for the purpose of the relocation and construction of the Stone Rural Footpath Accommodation Overbridge; the diversion of the Footpath and creation of the new area of woodland habitat;\r\n\r\n1.2.2. obtaining the relevant approvals from the highway and/or planning authority, as appropriate; and\r\n\r\n1.2.3. that the works associated with the above assurances do not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Stone Rural Footpath Accommodation Overbridge” means the Stone Rural Footpath 28 Accommodation Overbridge shown on plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n","Stone Rural Footpath 28 Accommodation Overbridge\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd","2018-07-13","Assurance","Stone Rural Footpath 28 Accommodation Overbridge as shown on plan 1\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C37.7","N/A","HoC/0063","Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd assurance 1","2019-03-05","Assurance","Aston Pool Farm, Stafford, ST15 0BH\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C37.8","N/A","HoC/0063","Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd assurance 2","2019-03-05","Assurance","Aston Pool Farm, Stafford, ST15 0BH\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C37.9","N/A","HoC/0063","Matthew Weaver and Matthew Weaver Ltd","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Aston Pool Farm, Stafford, ST15 0BH\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C38","Madders, Mark, James, Robert and Mary","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C38.1","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders, assurance 1","2018-05-30","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, \r\nStafford, ST18 0YA","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.2","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders, assurance 2","2018-05-30","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, \r\nStafford, ST18 0YA","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.3","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders, assurance 3","2018-05-30","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, \r\nStafford, ST18 0YA","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.4","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","5.1. If prior to the giving of notice of entry or prior to the notice of vesting under a general vesting declaration to acquire land permanently (whether or not before Royal Assent) the Petitioner identifies suitable land for the relocation of an agricultural building (whether within or outside Petitioner’s ownership) and the Petitioner provides to the Secretary of State a detailed course of action substantiating the relocation, the Secretary of State will confirm whether or not he accepts that the land identified and evidence supporting the course of action provides a reasonable basis for the Petitioner’s claim for compensation in the event that the Bill receives Royal Assent and the Secretary of State exercises his powers of compulsory acquisition.","Identification of land for the relocation of agricultural buildings\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders, assurance 5","2018-05-30","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, \r\nStafford, ST18 0YA","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.5","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","6.1.The Promoter acknowledges that proper professional costs and fees reasonably incurred by the Petitioner for the purposes of seeking to identify suitable alternative premises at which to relocate an agricultural building which is subject to the power of compulsory acquisition under the Bill, will form a Head of Claim as part of any disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of that land under the Bill.","Professional costs and fees\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders, assurance 6","2018-05-30","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, \r\nStafford, ST18 0YA","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.6","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","1.1.  The Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with the Petitioner, where a business case is approved and where it relates to a relocation necessary for the Petitioner’s farm business in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Promoter of land required for that business, such agreement to provide that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Promoter being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured.\r\n","Relocation Matters\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders, assurance 1","2018-06-11","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, \r\nStafford, ST18 0YA","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.7","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","2.1. The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of a relocation necessary for the Petitioner’s farm business required as a result of the impact of the project on the holding where the relocation is either:\r\n2.1.1. to be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or \r\n2.1.2. the subject of a separate application for planning consent. \r\n2.2. The assistance referred to in paragraph 2.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for the relocation of farm buildings. \r\n2.3. Paragraph 2.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 2.1., a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 2.1. and required to give effect to the relocation of farm buildings, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill. \r\n2.4. Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 2.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper C7: Business Relocation.\r\n2.5. In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.\r\n","Relocation of agricultural buildings\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders, assurance 2","2018-06-11","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, \r\nStafford, ST18 0YA","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.8","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 1","2019-02-13","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, \r\nStafford, ST18 0YA","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.9","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","2.1 The Nominated Undertaker will engage with the owner and occupier of the land with respect to the particular purpose(s) he expects to exercise the powers under clause 14 of the Bill, the type of vehicle(s) to be used, the purpose of the use and the expected frequency and period of use.\r\n","Use of private roads  \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 2","2019-02-13","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, \r\nStafford, ST18 0YA","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.10","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","3.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n3.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n3.4 Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n3.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 3","2019-02-13","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, \r\nStafford, ST18 0YA","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.11","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","1.1\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, the Promoter will not use its powers of compulsory acquisition or temporary use in respect of:\r\n1.1.1\tthe Blue Land designated in the Environmental Statement for woodland habitat creation PROVIDED THAT the Orange Land may be used for that purpose; and\r\n1.1.2\tthe Green Land designated in the Environmental Statement for grassland habitat creation PROVIDED that the Yellow Land may be used for that purpose.\r\n1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are:-\r\n1.2.1\tthe Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the establishment and maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land;\r\n1.2.2\tall required consents are obtained by the Promoter; \r\n1.2.3\tthere are no new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and\r\n1.2.4\tthat there are no impacts on the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n “Blue Land” means the part of the Petitioners’ Property shown indicatively shaded Blue on the Plan A1;\r\n“Green Land” means the part of the Petitioners’ Property shown indicatively shaded green on the Plan A1;\r\n\"Orange Land\" means the part of the Petitioners’ Property shown indicatively shaded orange on the Plan A1;\r\n“Petitioners” means together:- \r\na)\tJames Stuart Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA; \r\nb)\tMark Robert Madders of Lower Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA; and \r\nc)\tRobert Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA;\r\n","Environmental Mitigation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, Annex A, assurance 1","2019-04-02","Assurance","The “Blue Land,” “Orange Land\" and “Green Land defined in the assurance and shown on  Plan A1 attached to this assurance\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.12","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","2.1\tThe Promoter shall require the nominated undertaker to consult with the Petitioners during the detailed design of the Accommodation Overbridge and consider so far as reasonably practicable the reasonable requirements of the Petitioners when determining the specifications of the Accommodation Overbridge.\r\n2.2\tIn considering the Petitioners’ requirements the Promoter shall be satisfied that they\r\n2.2.1\tdo not result in any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement;\r\n2.2.2\tdo not adversely impact on the construction programme of the accommodation works or the Proposed Scheme;\r\n2.2.3\tare within the limits and powers of the Bill; and\r\n2.2.4\tdo not in all other respects affect the safe, economic and timely delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Accommodation Overbridge” means the Bridleway Tixall 0.1628 Accommodation Overbridge forming part of Work No. 49 as shown on plan No. 1-28 as deposited with the Bill;\r\n“Petitioners”\tmeans together:- \r\na)\tJames Stuart Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA;\r\nb)\tMark Robert Madders of Lower Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA; and\r\nc)\tRobert Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA;\r\n\r\n","Crossings Specification\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, Annex A, assurance 2","2019-04-02","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, \r\nStafford, ST18 0YA specifically the Bridleway Tixall 0.1628 Accommodation Overbridge forming part of Work No. 49 as shown on plan No. 1-28 as deposited with the Bill","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.13","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","3.1 \tIn the design and construction of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State shall, subject to the conditions at paragraph 1.2, require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to provide the Hedgerow Habitat so far as is reasonably practicable at the Property.\r\n3.2 \tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n3.2.1 \tthe proposed addition of the Hedgerow Habitat does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n3.2.2 \tthe Nominated Undertaker achieved all required consents for the Hedgerow Habitat; and\r\n3.2.3 \tprovided that the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the establishment and maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Hedgerow Habitat” means the proposed creation of additional hedgerow habitats of approximately 3.7km at the Property as illustrated red on the attached plan A2;\r\n\"Property\" means the land and buildings owned and occupied by the Petitioners located at Lower Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA;\r\n","Hedgerow Habitat\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, Annex A, assurance 3","2019-04-02","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, \r\nStafford, ST18 0YA","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.14","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","1.1\tSubject to the Nominated Undertaker taking account of the relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.2 below, during the construction of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to only use Hanyards Lane or permit Hanyards Lane to be used in accordance with the permitted uses specified in paragraph 1.3 below.\r\n1.2\tThe relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.1 above are:-\r\n1.2.1\tcompliance with all relevant approvals, permissions, undertakings and assurances regarding the operation and use of any Relevant Site Haul Roads; and\r\n1.2.2\tthe safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme. \r\n1.3\tThe permitted uses referred to in paragraph 1.1 above are the use of Hanyards Lane:-\r\n1.3.1\tduring any period prior to the construction and bringing into use of any Relevant Site Haul Roads, as a construction route for the passage of any persons or vehicles (with or without materials, plant or machinery) for purposes in connection with the construction of early works and/or the carrying out of land surveys or investigations for the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.3.2\tduring the period of the construction of the Proposed Scheme, as a construction route between the public road network and the Compound for any vehicles that cannot be permitted by the Nominated Undertaker to use any Relevant Site Haul Roads;\r\n1.3.3\tduring any period following the removal and closure for use of any Relevant Site Haul Roads, as a construction route for the passage of any persons or vehicles (with or without materials, plant or machinery) for purposes in connection with any construction demobilisation activities required for the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.3.4\tas a access route for the passage of any persons or vehicles (with or without materials, plant or machinery) for purposes in connection with the maintenance by the Nominated Undertaker of any mitigation planting provided as part of the Proposed Scheme on any land adjacent to and/or accessible from Hanyards Lane; \r\n1.3.5\tat any time as an access route between the public road network and the Compound for any emergency response vehicles; and\r\n1.3.6\tsuch other purposes as the Nominated Undertaker may agree with the Petitioners from time to time, such agreement not to be unreasonably withheld by the Petitioners.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Hanyards Lane” means that part of the private road known as Hanyards Lane that is located in the Parish of Tixall, Staffordshire and which is situated within plot AP2-16 and Plot 48 on Replacement Sheet No. 1-29 and Replacement Sheet No. 1-28 of the deposited plans for the additional provision to the Bill deposited in the House of Commons on 8 February 2019; \r\n“Relevant Site Haul Roads” means such site haul roads as may be constructed for the Proposed Scheme within the area of the land required for the construction of the railway which may be utilised by the Nominated Undertaker to provide a vehicular construction route between the public road network and the Compound; \r\n “the Compound” means the Brancote South Cutting Satellite Compound as authorised by the Bill the indicative location of which is shown on CT-05-214 in Environmental Statement Volume 2: Map Book, CA2: Colwich to Yarlet as deposited with the Bill;\r\n“Petitioners” means together:-  \r\na) James Stuart Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA;  \r\nb) Mark Robert Madders of Lower Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA; and  \r\nc) Robert Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA; ","Use of Hanyards Lane\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, Annex B, assurance 1","2019-04-02","Assurance","Such site haul roads as may be constructed for the Proposed Scheme within the area of the land required for the construction of the railway which may be utilised by the Nominated Undertaker to provide a vehicular construction route between the public road network and the Brancote South Cutting Satellite Compound \r\n\r\nand\r\n\r\nthat part of the private road known as Hanyards Lane in the Parish of Tixall, Staffordshire which is situated within plot 48a and Plot 48 on Sheet No. 1-29 and Sheet No. 1-28 of the deposited plans (as defined in the Bill).","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.15","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","2.1\tPrior to the completion of the detailed design of the Compound, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to agree with Petitioners the terms of the Hanyards Lane Traffic Management Plan.\r\n2.2\tNothing in paragraph 2.1 above shall require the Nominated Undertaker to agree to the inclusion of any terms in the Hanyards Lane Traffic Management Plan which give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement and/or which:- \r\n2.2.1\tprejudices or contravenes any requirements of the local planning authority for the approval of Large Goods Vehicle routes under Schedule 17 of the Bill;\r\n2.2.2\tprejudices or contravenes any requirements of the local planning or local highway authority in relation to any relevant approvals required under the Bill;\r\n2.2.3\tgives rise to the need to secure any additional land rights outside of the scope of the land rights which may be secured through the exercise of the Bill powers;\r\n2.2.4\tprejudices or contravenes any requirements of the local highway authority raised in connection with the preparation by the Nominated Undertaker in accordance with the CoCP for the Proposed Scheme of route-wide traffic management plans, local traffic management plans or site-specific traffic management plans;\r\n2.2.5\tprejudices or contravenes compliance with other relevant undertakings and assurances; and\r\n2.2.6\tprejudices the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n2.3\tThe Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker when preparing, in accordance with the requirements of the CoCP, any workforce travel plan that is relevant to the use of Hanyards Lane as a vehicular construction route to the Compound to include in that plan targets to reduce individual car journeys by the construction workforce for the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Hanyards Lane Traffic Management Plan” means a plan for the management of the use of Hanyards Lane by the Nominated Undertaker as part of a vehicular construction route to the Compound which shall include the information set out in the Appendix to this Assurance;\r\n“Relevant Site Haul Roads” means such site haul roads as may be constructed for the Proposed Scheme within the area of the land required for the construction of the railway which may be utilised by the Nominated Undertaker to provide a vehicular construction route between the public road network and the Compound;  \r\n“the Compound” means the Brancote South Cutting Satellite Compound as authorised by the Bill the indicative location of which is shown on CT-05-214 in Environmental Statement Volume 2: Map Book, CA2: Colwich to Yarlet as deposited with the Bill; \r\nThe Hanyards Lane Traffic Management Plan which is to be agreed in accordance with paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2 of this Assurance shall include, as appropriate, the following:- \r\nNOTE: Terms and expressions defined in this Assurance shall, if referred to in this Appendix, have the same meaning unless otherwise stated.\r\nSection 1 – Proposed Uses\r\nHead -\tIndicative Content\r\n1.1. Vehicle Type [Details of the type of HS2 vehicle(s) that are proposed to use Hanyards Lane as a construction route]\r\n1.2. Purpose [Details of the purpose of the proposed HS2 vehicular use of Hanyards Lane]\r\n1.3. Frequency\t[Details of the expected frequency of HS2 vehicle movements along Hanyards Lane during the construction of the Proposed Scheme]\r\n1.4. Period [Details of the period of the proposed use of Hanyards Lane as a as a vehicular construction route the Compound]\r\nSection 2 – Management Methodology\r\n2.1. Management Methodology\t[Information on any method or methods which may be employed for managing the movement of HS2 Large Goods Vehicles along Hanyards Lane, such methods may include:\r\n·\tthe movement of HS2 Large Goods Vehicles along Hanyards Lane by convoy; or\r\n·\tthe use of a permit access system for HS2 Large Goods Vehicles seeking to access along Hanyards Lane.]\r\n2.2. Vehicle Holding Areas [Information on the potential use of or need for a vehicle holding area for HS2 Large Goods Vehicles accessing along Hanyards Lane.]\r\n2.3. Traffic Control Gates [Information on the potential use of or need for traffic control gates as a means to manage vehicular access onto Hanyards Lane from the Compound and /or the Property.]\r\nSection 3 – Summary of Workforce Travel Plan\r\n3.1. Summary of [Summary of details of the HS2 workforce travel plan (as referred to in\r\nworkforce travel plan\tparagraph 2.3 of this assurance) that is relevant to the use of Hanyards\r\n Lane as a vehicular construction route the Compound]\r\n3.2. Targets [Summary of the targets included in the workforce travel plan to reduce individual car journeys by the construction workforce for the Proposed Scheme that is relevant to the use of Hanyards Lane as a vehicular construction route the Compound]\r\n","Hanyards Lane Traffic Management Plan\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, Annex B, assurance 2","2019-04-02","Assurance","Such site haul roads as may be constructed for the Proposed Scheme within the area of the land required for the construction of the railway which may be utilised by the Nominated Undertaker to provide a vehicular construction route between the public road network and the Brancote South Cutting Satellite Compound \r\n\r\nand\r\n\r\nthat part of the private road known as Hanyards Lane in the Parish of Tixall, Staffordshire which is situated within plot 48a and Plot 48 on Sheet No. 1-29 and Sheet No. 1-28 of the deposited plans (as defined in the Bill).l ","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.16","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","3.1\tSubject to paragraph 3.2 below, in the event that the Nominated Undertaker uses Hanyards Lane as a vehicular construction route to the Compound then, unless otherwise agreed by the Petitioners, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to install, at the Nominated Undertaker’s cost, the CCCM.\r\n3.2\tThe installation of the CCCM by the Nominated Undertaker is subject to the Nominated Undertaker securing all necessary consents, permissions and land rights as may be required for the installation of the CCCM.\r\n3.3\tThe Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker, prior to the Nominated Undertaker commencing the installation of the CCCM in accordance with this paragraph 3, to consult with the Petitioners on the detailed design of the CCCM to be installed.\r\n3.4\tThe Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation under paragraph 3.3 above and in so far as reasonably practicable shall accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioners to modify the design of the CCCM for the purposes of facilitating the safe movement of cattle across Hanyards Lane in connection with the operation of the Petitioners agricultural holding as operated by the Petitioners on or from the Property.\r\n3.5\tNothing in paragraph 3.4 above shall require any modification to the design of the CCCM which:-\r\n3.5.1\tgives rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and/or\r\n3.5.2\tprejudices the safe and efficient use of Hanyards Lane as a vehicular construction route to the Compound.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\nCattle Crossing Control Mechanism (“CCCM”) means the environmental statement including any supplementary environmental statement deposited into Parliament with the Bill; means such mechanism(s) as may be appropriate for the purposes of facilitating the crossing of Hanyards Lane by cattle and which shall be located at or within close proximity to the point marked ‘X’ on Plan B1. Such appropriate mechanism(s) may include the following features:- \r\na)\treplacement of existing cattle grid(s) located in Hanyards Lane,\r\nb)\tinstallation of new manually retractable fence(s) and / or gate(s); and / or\r\nc)\tthe provision of a vehicle banksman.\r\n\r\n“Petitioners” means together:-  \r\na) James Stuart Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA;  \r\nb) Mark Robert Madders of Lower Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA; and  \r\nc) Robert Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA; \r\n\r\n“the Property” means the land and buildings owned and occupied by the Petitioners located at Lower Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA and which are shown edged red on Plan B2; \r\n\r\n “the Compound” means the Brancote South Cutting Satellite Compound as authorised by the Bill the indicative location of which is shown on CT-05-214 in Environmental Statement Volume 2: Map Book, CA2: Colwich to Yarlet as deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n“Hanyards Lane” means that part of the private road known as Hanyards Lane that is located in the Parish of Tixall, Staffordshire and which is situated within plot AP2-16 and Plot 48 on Replacement Sheet No. 1-29 and Replacement Sheet No. 1-28 of the deposited plans for the additional provision to the Bill deposited in the House of Commons on 8 February 2019; \r\n\r\n","Cattle Crossing Control Mechanism \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, Annex B, assurance 3","2019-04-02","Assurance","“Hanyards Lane”  that part of the private road known as Hanyards Lane in the Parish of Tixall, Staffordshire which is situated within plot 48a and Plot 48 on Sheet No. 1-29 and Sheet No. 1-28 of the deposited plans (as defined in the Bill), specifically  the point marked ‘X’ on Plan B1 attached to this assurance.","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.17","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","4.1\tIn the event that the Nominated Undertaker uses Hanyards Lane as a vehicular construction route to the Compound then, during the detailed design of the Compound, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to engage with the Petitioners regarding the provision by the Nominated Undertaker of any new or improved vehicle passing place(s) on Hanyards Lane as may be reasonable and appropriate for managing the use of Hanyards Lane as a vehicular construction route to the Compound.\r\n4.2\tWhere pursuant to the engagement under paragraph 4.1 above the provision of new or improved vehicle passing place(s) on Hanyards Lane is identified, then the Nominated Undertaker will construct such vehicle passing place(s) and shall bear the reasonable cost of so doing. \r\n4.3\tThe provision of passing place(s) under paragraph 4.2 shall be subject to the Nominated Undertaker securing all necessary consents, permissions and land rights as may be required for the installation and use of the vehicle passing place(s) and provided that the land required for the passing place(s) is provided by the Petitioner at no cost to the Nominated Undertaker. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Hanyards Lane” means that part of the private road known as Hanyards Lane that is located in the Parish of Tixall, Staffordshire and which is situated within plot AP2-16 and Plot 48 on Replacement Sheet No. 1-29 and Replacement Sheet No. 1-28 of the deposited plans for the additional provision to the Bill deposited in the House of Commons on 8 February 2019;\r\n “the Compound” means the Brancote South Cutting Satellite Compound as authorised by the Bill the indicative location of which is shown on CT-05-214 in Environmental Statement Volume 2: Map Book, CA2: Colwich to Yarlet as deposited with the Bill;\r\n“Petitioners” means together:-  \r\na) James Stuart Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA;  \r\nb) Mark Robert Madders of Lower Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA; and  \r\nc) Robert Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA;\r\n","Hanyards Lane Vehicle Passing Place(s)\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, Annex B, assurance 4","2019-04-02","Assurance","Such site haul roads as may be constructed for the Proposed Scheme within the area of the land required for the construction of the railway which may be utilised by the Nominated Undertaker to provide a vehicular construction route between the public road network and the Brancote South Cutting Satellite Compound \r\n\r\nand\r\n\r\nthat part of the private road known as Hanyards Lane in the Parish of Tixall, Staffordshire which is situated within plot 48a and Plot 48 on Sheet No. 1-29 and Sheet No. 1-28 of the deposited plans (as defined in the Bill).","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.18","N/A","HoC/0064","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","5.1\tBefore the commencement of the use of Hanyards Lane as a vehicular construction route to the Compound, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to prepare:-\r\n5.1.1\ta condition survey of the condition of Hanyards Lane (“the Survey”); and\r\n5.1.2\tif relevant, a schedule detailing any remedial works required to be undertaken by the Nominated Undertaker before the commencement of the use of Hanyards Lane as a vehicular construction route to the Compound (“the Schedule”).\r\n5.2\tThe Secretary of State will instruct the Nominated Undertaker to issue a copy of the Survey and the Schedule, as prepared under paragraph 5.1 above, to the Petitioners and to have regard where reasonably practicable to comments made by the Petitioners on the remedial works detailed in the Schedule.\r\n5.3\tWhere damage to Hanyards Lane is caused by or results from the Nominated Undertaker’s use of Hanyards Lane as a vehicular construction route to the Compound, then the Nominated Undertaker shall make good such damage to the reasonable satisfaction of the Petitioners.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Hanyards Lane” means that part of the private road known as Hanyards Lane that is located in the Parish of Tixall, Staffordshire and which is situated within plot AP2-16 and Plot 48 on Replacement Sheet No. 1-29 and Replacement Sheet No. 1-28 of the deposited plans for the additional provision to the Bill deposited in the House of Commons on 8 February 2019;\r\n“the Compound” means the Brancote South Cutting Satellite Compound as authorised by the Bill the indicative location of which is shown on CT-05-214 in Environmental Statement Volume 2: Map Book, CA2: Colwich to Yarlet as deposited with the Bill;\r\n“Petitioners”\tmeans together:- \r\na)\tJames Stuart Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA; \r\nb)\tMark Robert Madders of Lower Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA; and \r\nc)\tRobert Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA;\r\n","Hanyards Lane Condition Survey, Remedial Works and Repair Works\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, Annex B, assurance 5","2019-04-02","Assurance","Such site haul roads as may be constructed for the Proposed Scheme within the area of the land required for the construction of the railway which may be utilised by the Nominated Undertaker to provide a vehicular construction route between the public road network and the Brancote South Cutting Satellite Compound \r\n\r\nand\r\n\r\nthat part of the private road known as Hanyards Lane in the Parish of Tixall, Staffordshire which is situated within plot 48a and Plot 48 on Sheet No. 1-29 and Sheet No. 1-28 of the deposited plans (as defined in the Bill).","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.19","N/A","HoC/0064 & AP2/0030","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","1. 1\tThe Nominated Undertaker will, during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, review the use of local placement, and following such review will consider whether it is reasonably practicable to reduce the size of the local placement proposed to be located on Area A. For the avoidance of doubt, the review will consider whether it is reasonably practicable to instead make use of land already owned by the Promoter for the purposes of local placement, without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.2 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will, during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, engage with the Petitioner and will inform them of the outcome of the review of local placement sites (described in paragraph 1.1 above) with reference to Area A.\r\n2.1 \tIf the Nominated Undertaker confirms that the local placement of excavated materials is required in Area A, then the Petitioner will be provided with details of the schedule and duration of HS2 works associated with local placement expected to affect Area A. The Nominated Undertaker will continue to engage with the Petitioner throughout the duration of HS2 works affecting Area A, and will fulfil its existing commitment to put in place an agricultural liaison service.\r\n3.1\tWhere local placement of excavated materials is required in Area A but the Nominated Undertaker and Petitioner agree that an alternative site (“Area B”) should be used for the same purpose, then the Nominated Undertaker will use Area B for the purposes of local placement of excavated materials, subject to the conditions in paragraph 3.2.\r\n3.2\tThe condition referred to in paragraph 3.1 are:\r\n3.2.1\tThe Petitioner providing any necessary access on terms satisfactory to the Nominated Undertaker; \r\n3.2.2\tthe Nominated Undertaker securing any necessary consents and permissions provided that such consents can be reasonably implemented, and any approvals required under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 of the Bill; and \r\n3.2.3\tthere being no new or different significant environmental effects from those reported in the Environmental Statement\r\n4.1\tFor the avoidance of doubt, where Area B is used for the purposes of local placement of excavated materials, Assurances 1 and 2 will apply to Area B as if it was Area A with any necessary variations that the Nominated Undertaker considers appropriate to address the particular characteristics of Area B.”\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“Area A” means the land shaded Blue on Plan 1 and Plan 2;\r\n“Area B” means the land shaded Red on Plan 1; \r\n“Petitioner” means Mr Mark Madders of Lower Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA, Mr James Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA, Mr Robert Madders c/o Upper Hanyards Lane, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA, Mrs Mary Madders of Deer Park Farm t/as J S Madders and Sons.\r\n\r\n","Review of local placement\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson,  assurance 1 to 4","2019-04-23","Assurance","Area of land proposed for local placement on Upper Hanyards Farm\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.20","N/A","HoC/0064 & AP2/0030","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","1.1 \tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to construct an Accommodation Overbridge capable of accommodating vehicles permitted for use on a public highway and to consider when carrying out detailed design of the Accommodation Overbridge the Petitioner’s reasonable requests to accommodate vehicles or undertake operations on or over the Accommodation Overbridge which exceed the Maximum Authorised Weight or the Overall Vehicle Dimensions.\r\n1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1:\r\n1.2.1\tthe Petitioner informs the nominated undertaker of any required vehicular use over the Accommodation Overbridge which exceeds the Maximum Authorised Weight or the Overall Vehicle Dimensions as soon as possible and in any event prior to the commencement of detailed design of the Accommodation Overbridge;\r\n1.2.2\tthe Accommodation Overbridge can be provided within the existing powers of the Bill and without the need for any additional land; \r\n1.2.3\tthe nominated undertaker concludes that any change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without adverse impact on the construction programme of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.4\tprovision of the Accommodation Overbridge does not result in any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and\r\n1.2.5\tthe nominated undertaker concludes that any change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without prejudicing the safety, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“1986 Regulations” means The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 as amended; \r\n“1998 Regulations” means The Road Vehicles (Authorised Weight) Regulations 1998 as amended;\r\n“Accommodation Overbridge” means an accommodation overbridge to be constructed under the Bill and referred to as Work 49 of the Authorised Works in Schedule 1 of the Bill;\r\n “Maximum Authorised Weight” as defined in the 1998 Regulations;\r\n“the Overall Vehicle Dimensions” as set out and defined in the 1986 Regulations namely the vehicular overall height, overall width and overall length;\r\n“Petitioner” means Mr Mark Madders of Lower Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA, Mr James Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA, Mr Robert Madders c/o Upper Hanyards Lane, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA, Mrs Mary Madders of Deer Park Farm t/as J S Madders and Sons.\r\n\r\n","Accommodation Overbridge\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2019-05-04","Assurance","Area of land proposed for mitigation at Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA\r\n\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.21","N/A","HoC/0064 & AP2/0030","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A ","2019-07-08","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA\r\n\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.22","N/A","HoL/0010","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","1.1.\tSubject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below the Secretary of State shall acquire the Land and Property for the purposes of the construction, operation and maintenance of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are:\r\n1.2.1.\tthe Petitioner, being the freehold owner and occupier of the Land and Property entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the acquisition of the Land and Property including the following terms:\r\n1.2.1.1.\tthe price to be paid for the Land and Property shall be assessed in accordance with the principles of the Compensation Code (or in the absence of agreement, by the price being 90% of the Secretary of State’s assessment of the acquisition price) as if assessed as an advanced payment under s.52 of the Land Compensation Act 1973. The acquisition price shall be in full and final settlement of all claims for compensation in respect of the open market value of the Land and Property to be acquired;\r\n1.2.1.2.\tin the absence of agreement between the parties, any dispute as to compensation to be referred to the Upper Tribunal;\r\n1.2.1.3.\tthe Land and Property will be acquired under the principles of the Compensation Code as set out by Section 5 of the Land Compensation Act including Rule 2 and Rule 6 with the full benefit of the Compensation Code including reference to the Upper Tribunal for non-agreed elements etc;\r\n1.2.1.4.\tthe valuation date for the Land and Property will be the earlier of the date of completion of the sale of the Land and entry by the Secretary of State on the Land under powers of entry to be conferred under the Bill;\r\n1.2.1.5.\tany claim for compensation for the acquisition of the Land and Property will be calculated under the principles of the Compensation Code and valued at the valuation date;\r\n1.2.1.6.\tthe agreement will provide for the purchase price and compensation of Land and Property to be acquired is payable subject to phased payments following completion of milestones; \r\n1.2.1.7.\tthe agreement will provide the Petitioner with the right to sublet the Property subject to the written consent of the Secretary of State;\r\n1.2.1.8.\ton completion of the sale of the Land the Secretary of State will grant a farm business tenancy of the Land on terms acceptable to the Secretary of State and including conditions set out in the schedule attached to these assurances. The agreement will include clauses agreed between the parties on the insurance of the Land and mechanisms in the event of any damage of the Land; \r\n1.2.1.9.\tthe Petitioner shall deliver vacant possession of the Land by the possession date, being the termination date of the tenancy;\r\n1.2.1.10.\tthe agreement will also include any other clauses required by the Secretary of State in order to facilitate the transfer of the Land and Property; \r\n1.2.1.11.\tthe agreement will make provision for the Secretary of State , in contemplating a disposal under the terms of the 2019 Rules, to waive the exception set out in paragraph 10 of the 2019 Rules when considering the extent to which the character of the Land may have changed as a result of the construction of the authorised works on the Land;\r\n1.2.1.12.\tthe agreement will make provision that:\r\n (i)\tthe Land need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the Land; and\r\n (ii)\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n (iii)\tprovides for the maintenance of any environmental mitigation to be provided on the Land; \r\nprovided that the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an owner-occupier of adjoining land and an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;\r\n1.2.1.13.\tthe Secretary of State shall reimburse the Petitioner for reasonable legal and agents fees incurred in dealing with the acquisition of the Property, the Farmhouse and the leaseback to the extent that these are covered by the Compensation Code. Agents fees to be reimbursed at the rates currently agreed.\r\n1.2.2.\tNothing in these assurances shall prevent the Secretary of State serving notice under the Phase 2a Bill as enacted the Secretary of State will pay compensation in line with the Compensation Code and taking account of any payments of compensation that have actually been made to the Petitioner so there shall be no double recovery of compensation.\r\n\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“2019 Rules” means the Crichel Down Rules as amended in July 2019;\r\n“authorised works” means the works to be authorised under the Bill;\r\n“Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the “Bill” includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Compensation Code” means the collective term for the legal principles relating to the compensation for compulsory acquisition and deriving from Acts of Parliament and case law;\r\n“the Land” means 40.029 hectares of agricultural land at Upper Hanyards Farm, shown for the purpose of identification only edged on red and shaded pink on the Plan;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Mr Mark Madders of Lower Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA, Mr James Madders of Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA, Mr Robert Madders c/o Upper Hanyards Lane, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA, Mrs Mary Madders of Deer Park Farm t/as J S Madders and Sons;\r\n“the Plan” means the plan annexed to these assurances;\r\n“Property” means 820.697square metres of land comprising the farmhouse and residential curtilage shown edged in blue for the purposes of identification only on the Plan; \r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Acquisition\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A ","2019-10-22","Assurance","Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA\r\n\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C38.23","N/A","HoL/0010","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","Subject to you countersigning this letter confirming that the Petitioners will use reasonable endeavours to continue negotiations in good faith with the Promoter to complete the Documentation the Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to continue negotiations in good faith with the Petitioners to complete the Documentation as soon as reasonably practicable prior to Royal Assent for the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Documentation” means:-\r\na)\tA set of heads of terms making provision for the completion of the documents referred to in  b) to e) below;\r\nb)\tAn Agreement for the sale and purchase of land at Upper and Lower Hanyards Farm, Stafford, Staffordshire to be entered into by (1) the Petitioners and (2) Secretary of State for Transport;\r\nc)\t3 Transfer Deeds in form TR1 for the transfers of the freehold land referred to in 1) above;\r\nd)\tA Farm business tenancy relating to premises at Upper and Lower Hanyards Farm, Stafford, Staffordshire to be entered into by (1) Secretary of State for Transport and (2) the Petitioners; and\r\ne)\tA Rent Deposit Deed to be entered into between (1) the Secretary of State, (2) High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd and (3) the Petitioners","Negotiations in good faith\r\n\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2020-09-02","Assurance","Upper Hanyards Farm, Hanyards Lane, Tixall, Staffordshire ST18 0YA\r\n\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C39","Williams, Julie","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C39.1","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Richard (deceased) and Mrs Julie Williams, assurance 1","2018-05-30","Assurance","Park Farm, Stafford, ST18 0BD ","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.2","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Richard (deceased) and Mrs Julie Williams, assurance 2","2018-05-30","Assurance","Park Farm, Stafford, ST18 0BD ","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.3","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Richard (deceased) and Mrs Julie Williams, assurance 3","2018-05-30","Assurance","Park Farm, Stafford, ST18 0BD ","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.4","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","4.1. The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the relocation of any agricultural buildings displaced for the purposes of the project where the replacement is either:\r\n4.1.1\tto be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or\r\n4.1.2. the subject of a separate application for planning consent.\r\n4.2. The assistance referred to in paragraph 10.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for relocation of an agricultural building.\r\n4.3. Paragraph 10.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 10.1., a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 10.1. and required to give effect to the relocation of an agricultural building, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill.\r\n4.4. Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 10.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Information Paper C7, Business Relocation.\r\n4.5. In this assurance and in Assurances 11 and 12, “agricultural building” includes a residential building occupied as part of an agricultural building.\r\n4.6. In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.","Relocation of agricultural buildings","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Richard (deceased) and Mrs Julie Williams, assurance 4","2018-05-30","Assurance","Park Farm, Stafford, ST18 0BD ","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.5","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","5.1. If prior to the giving of notice of entry or prior to the notice of vesting under a general vesting declaration to acquire land permanently (whether or not before Royal Assent) the Petitioner identifies suitable land for the relocation of an agricultural building (whether within or outside Petitioner’s ownership) and the Petitioner provides to the Secretary of State a detailed course of action substantiating the relocation, the Secretary of State will confirm whether or not he accepts that the land identified and evidence supporting the course of action provides a reasonable basis for the Petitioner’s claim for compensation in the event that the Bill receives Royal Assent and the Secretary of State exercises his powers of compulsory acquisition.","Identification of land for the relocation of agricultural buildings","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Richard (deceased) and Mrs Julie Williams,, assurance 5","2018-05-30","Assurance","Park Farm, Stafford, ST18 0BD ","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.6","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","6.1.The Promoter acknowledges that proper professional costs and fees reasonably incurred by the Petitioner for the purposes of seeking to identify suitable alternative premises at which to relocate an agricultural building which is subject to the power of compulsory acquisition under the Bill, will form a Head of Claim as part of any disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of that land under the Bill.","Professional costs and fees\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Richard deceased) and Mrs Julie Williams, assurance 6","2018-05-30","Assurance","Park Farm, Stafford, ST18 0BD ","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.7","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to complete the detailed design of Trent Walk Underbridge, so as to provide a minimum vertical clearance of 4.25 meters from the surface of the track beneath the underbridge and the underside of the underbridge.\r\n\r\nThis assurance is subject to the successful promotion of an Additional Provision and approvals of the local planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Trent Walk Underbridge” means the underbridge shown tinted pink on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n","Trent Walk Underbridge","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company)","2018-07-04","Assurance","The underbridge shown tinted pink on the plan attached to the letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.8","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","1.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to modify the design of the proposed ecological mitigation in the land edged red on plan 1 accompanying this assurance [attached to beneficiary letter] for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the Works.\r\n","Ecological mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1.1","2018-07-06","Assurance","Park Farm, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.9","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the land take for the balancing pond identified in blue shading on plan 1 accompanying this assurance [attached to beneficiary letter].\r\n\r\n2.2. The assurance in 2.1 is subject to:\r\n2.2.1. the Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents required in order to deliver the drainage requirements for the Proposed Scheme at any alternative site;\r\n\r\n2.2.2. that any alternative site will not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n2.2.3. that the balancing pond can be relocated without prejudicing the safety, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Reduction in the land take for balancing pond","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurances 2","2018-07-06","Assurance","Land at Park Farm, Weston Road, Stafford,\r\nST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.10","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","3.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 3.2, to remove the width of woodland habitat creation proposed to be located within the Orange Land, and shown indicatively in orange on Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter], and introduce an area of hedgerow habitat creation proposed to be located within the Green Land, and shown indicatively in green on Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter].\r\n\r\n3.2.1. the nominated undertaker being satisfied that the woodland habitat creation can be delivered at the Pink Land without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n3.2.2. the Petitioner entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the construction and maintenance of the woodland habitat creation to be provided on the Pink Land, subject to a management and maintenance agreement with the Petitioner and the Secretary of State;\r\n\r\n3.2.3. the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the woodland habitat creation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of the woodland habitat creation;\r\n\r\n3.2.4. the Pink Land not being subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the construction, maintenance or the objectives of the woodland habitat creation required to be provided on the Pink Land; and\r\n\r\n3.2.5. all necessary approvals required from the local planning authority for constructing and maintaining the woodland habitat creation on the Pink Land;\r\n\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Orange Land” means the land coloured orange on Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter], being land within the Petitioner’s ownership which has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of woodland habitat creation;\r\n\r\n“the Green Land” means the land coloured green on Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter], being land within the Petitioner’s ownership which has been identified to introduce an area of hedgerow habitat creation; and\r\n\r\n“the Pink Land” means the land coloured red on Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter], being land within the Petitioner’s ownership, which has been identified to introduce an area of woodland habitat creation;\r\n","Woodland habitat creation – habitat connectivity","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-07-06","Assurance","Park Farm, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD - the land coloured orange; the land coloured green; and\r\n the land coloured red on Plan 2 attached to the letter.","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.11","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","4.1. In carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner over the variety of trees planted in the land shaded orange on plan 3 [attached to beneficiary letter] and use reasonable endeavours to reduce overshadowing of the Petitioners’ residential properties, provided that the planting in this area achieves the environmental objectives of the proposed mitigation.\r\n","Woodland habitat creation – habitat creation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2018-07-06","Assurance","Park Farm, Weston Road, Stafford,\r\nST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.12","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","5.1. Where existing services on the Property would be severed as a result of the construction of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, prior to the completion of the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, to consult with the Petitioner to seek to provide, where reasonably practicable, replacement conduits necessary for the efficient management of the Petitioner’s Property as a farm enterprise.\r\n","Provision of conduits","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2018-07-06","Assurance","Park Farm, Weston Road, Stafford,\r\nST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.13","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","6.1. The nominated undertaker will identify with the Petitioner existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n\r\n6.2. The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the nominated undertaker.\r\n\r\n6.3. The nominated undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n\r\n6.4. Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the Petitioner which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n\r\n6.5. As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the Petitioner by the nominated undertaker.\r\n\r\n6.6. Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the Petitioner.\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 6","2018-07-06","Assurance","Park Farm, Weston Road, Stafford,\r\nST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.14","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2019-02-13","Assurance","Park Farm, Weston Road, Stafford,\r\nST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.15","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","2.1 The Nominated Undertaker will engage with the owner and occupier of the land with respect to the particular purpose(s) he expects to exercise the powers under clause 14 of the Bill, the type of vehicle(s) to be used, the purpose of the use and the expected frequency and period of use.\r\n","Use of private roads  ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-02-13","Assurance","Park Farm, Weston Road, Stafford,\r\nST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.16","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","3.1  The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n3.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n3.4 Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n3.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Adjoining Land” means land which adjoins Staffordshire County Showground and can be used as replacement car parking; \r\n“SBAS” means Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society (registered company number: 03682748) (registered charity number: 1073166) of The County Showground, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD who trade as Stafford Showground Limited; \r\n","Drainage  ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2019-02-13","Assurance","Park Farm, Weston Road, Stafford,\r\nST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.17","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","1. Subject to the conditions in paragraph 2 being met, the Secretary of State will not exercise powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill over the land edged (red) on the attached Plan (“the Land”) [attached to beneficiary letter]. \r\n2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that the Secretary of State is satisfied that:\r\na. an agreement between SBAS and the owners and occupiers of Adjoining Land has been concluded to allow SBAS to acquire sufficient land equivalent in function to the land lost as a result of the Proposed Scheme to allow the car parking at Staffordshire County Showground to continue to operate during the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme and the land has been transferred to SBAS by the date of Royal Assent to the Bill; or\r\nb. there is no need for the Land to be acquired to allow car parking at the Staffordshire Country Showground to continue to operate during the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n3. If the Secretary of State is not satisfied that the conditions in paragraph 2 have been met by the date of Royal Assent to the Bill then the Secretary of State may exercise powers of compulsory acquisition over the land referred to in paragraph 1 above or over so much of this land as is necessary to acquire land equivalent in function to the land lost as a result of the Proposed Scheme. \r\n4. Where powers of compulsory acquisition are exercised by the Secretary of State in accordance with paragraph 3, but only part of the land referred to in paragraph 1 is required, the Secretary of State shall liaise with the landowner in relation to the exercise of the powers of compulsory acquisition.”","Acquisition","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company) assurance 1 to 4","2019-03-13","Assurance","Park Farm, Weston Road, Stafford,\r\nST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.18","N/A","HoC/0065","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","1. Subject to the conditions in paragraph 2 being met, the Secretary of State will not exercise powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill over the land edged (red) on the attached Plan (“the Land”). [attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n2.  The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that the Secretary of State is satisfied that:\r\na. an agreement between SBAS and the owners and occupiers of Adjoining Land has been concluded to allow SBAS to acquire sufficient land equivalent in function to the land lost as a result of the Proposed Scheme to allow the car parking at Staffordshire County Showground to continue to operate during the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme and the land has been transferred to SBAS or an agreement capable of providing for the transfer of the land to SBAS has been entered into and registered with HM Land Registry by the date of Royal Assent to the Bill; or\r\nb. there is no need for the Land to be acquired to allow car parking at the Staffordshire Country Showground to continue to operate during the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n3. If the Secretary of State is not satisfied that the conditions in paragraph 2 have been met by the date of Royal Assent to the Bill then the Secretary of State may exercise powers of compulsory acquisition over the land referred to in paragraph 1 above or over so much of this land as is necessary to acquire land equivalent in function to the land lost as a result of the Proposed Scheme. \r\n4. Where powers of compulsory acquisition are exercised by the Secretary of State in accordance with paragraph 3, but only part of the land referred to in paragraph 1 is required, the Secretary of State shall liaise with the landowner in relation to the exercise of the powers of compulsory acquisition.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Adjoining Land” means land which adjoins Staffordshire County Showground and can be used as replacement car parking; \r\n“SBAS” means Staffordshire and Birmingham Agricultural Society (registered company number: 03682748) (registered charity number: 1073166) of The County Showground, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD who trade as Stafford Showground Limited.","Land for replacement car parking ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurances 1 to 4","2019-04-30","Assurance","Park Farm, Weston Road, Stafford,\r\nST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C39.19","N/A","HoC/0065, AP2/0029","Mrs Julie Williams and Executors of Mr Richard Williams (deceased)","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company),  Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Park Farm, Weston Road, Stafford, ST18 0BD","Stafford Borough"]
["C40","Green, R, P and A","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C40.1","N/A","HoC/0067","R, P and A Green","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to R, P and A Green, assurance 1","2018-05-30","Assurance","Walton Heath Farm, Stone, ST15 0BX ","Stafford Borough"]
["C40.2","N/A","HoC/0067","R, P and A Green","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to R, P and A Green, assurance 2","2018-05-30","Assurance","Walton Heath Farm, Stone, ST15 0BX ","Stafford Borough"]
["C40.3","N/A","HoC/0067","R, P and A Green","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to R, P and A Green, assurance 3","2018-05-30","Assurance","Walton Heath Farm, Stone, ST15 0BX ","Stafford Borough"]
["C40.4","N/A","HoC/0067","R, P and A Green","1.1. Subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 first being met, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to construct the part of Eccleshall Road contained in Work No. 68 in the Parish of Stone as set out in the Bill on a revised alignment to move it approximately 75m south of the current alignment shown on Sheet No. 1-37 of the plans and sections deposited with the Bill to ensure that the Micklow Bungalow as shown edged red on the accompanying plan is on the north side of the revised alignment of Eccleshall Road.\r\n\r\n1.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are:\r\n\r\n1.2.1. the proposed alignment can be accommodated within the existing powers of the Bill and does not require any additional land or powers to those currently provided for within the Bill;\r\n\r\n1.2.2. the successful promotion by the Promoter of an Additional Provision for sufficient additional mitigation planting as a result of the realigned section of Eccleshall Road;\r\n\r\n1.2.3. the local highway authority does not object to the proposed revised alignment;\r\n\r\n1.2.4. any statutory approvals required from the Local Highway Authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill being secured including the required reduction in speed limits for the design standard of the road;\r\n\r\n1.2.5. the construction and operation of the revised alignment as proposed does not adversely impact on the operation of any other highways including the M6 Motorway;\r\n\r\n1.2.6. the construction and operation of the proposed alignment does not give rise to any new or materially different environment effects from those reported in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n\r\n1.2.7. changes to the Bill made by any future Additional Provisions not being adversely affected by this assurance; and\r\n\r\n1.2.8. the construction and operation of the proposed alignment does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Eccleshall Road","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to R, P and A Green, letter 1, assurance 1","2018-06-18","Assurance","Eccleshall Road","Stafford Borough"]
["C40.5","N/A","HoC/0067","R, P and A Green","1.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, to remove the width of the landscape mitigation planting proposed to be located within the Blue Land, and shown indicatively in blue on the attached plan, and introduce an area of hedgerow habitat creation proposed to be located within the Green Land, and shown indicatively in green on the attached plan deposited with the Bill.\r\n\r\n1.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n\r\n1.2.1. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1 not creating any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n1.2.2. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1 not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n\r\n1.2.3. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1 receiving approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Blue Land” means the land shown in blue on the attached plan  [attached to beneficiary letter] comprising part of the land identified as plots 56 on Sheet Nos. 1-36 and 1-37 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill, being the area of landscape mitigation planting proposed to be removed from the scheme design;\r\n\r\n“the Green Land” means the land shown in green on the attached plan  [attached to beneficiary letter] comprising part of the land identified as plots 56 on Sheet No. 1-36 and 1-37 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill, being an area of proposed hedgerow habitat creation.\r\n","Landscape mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to R, P and A Green, letter 2, assurance 1","2018-06-18","Assurance","The land shown in blue on the attached plan comprising part of the land identified as plots 56 on Sheet Nos. 1-36 and 1-37 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill; and\r\n\r\nthe land shown in green on the attached plan comprising part of the land identified as plots 56 on Sheet No. 1-36 and 1-37 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill","Stafford Borough"]
["C40.6","N/A","HoC/0067","R, P and A Green","\r\n1.2 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.3 being met and obtaining any necessary consents, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to construct the Access.\r\n\r\n1.3 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.2 are:\r\n\r\n1.3.1 that the part of Eccleshall Road contained in Work No. 68 will be constructed on a revised alignment to move it approximately 75m south of the current alignment shown on Sheet No. 1-37 of the plans and sections deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n1.3.2 that the Access can be accommodated within the existing powers of the Bill and does not require any additional land or powers to those currently provided for within the Bill;\r\n\r\n1.3.3 the local highway authority does not object to the construction and operation of the proposed Access;\r\n\r\n1.3.4 any statutory approvals required from the local highway authority, including under Schedule 4 to the Bill can be secured;\r\n\r\n1.3.5 the construction and operation of the Access does not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those reported in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill; and\r\n\r\n1.3.6 the construction and operation of the Access does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n1.4 For the avoidance of doubt and subject to the Petitioner securing all appropriate local authority consents, the Promoter will not object to future proposals by the Petitioner to reconstruct the Access.\r\n\r\n1.5 Subject to the Secretary of State complying with the relevant legislation regarding the disposal of land, the Secretary of State will not seek to extract a ransom from the petitioner in relation to the disposal of land for the Access.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Access” a gate and access of equivalent dimensions to the Existing Access from the realigned Eccleshall Road to the land retained by the Petitioner at a location within the area coloured pink\r\non Plan 3;\r\n\r\n“Plan 3” means the attached plan bearing reference ‘Plan 3’’ [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n","Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to R, P and A Green, assurances 1.2 - 1.5","2018-07-09","Assurance","From the realigned Eccleshall Road to the land retained by the Petitioner at a location within the area coloured pink on Plan 3 attached to the letter\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C40.7","N/A","HoC/0067","R, P and A Green","\r\n2.2 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 2.3 below the Promoter will, prior to the service of an Acquisition Notice, use reasonable endeavours to enter into an agreement with the Petitioners, such agreement to include the following provisions:\r\n\r\n2.2.1 If an Acquisition Notice served by the Promoter comprises any part of the Blue Land then (unless otherwise agreed) the Petitioner may serve a Counternotice and the Promoter will then be obliged to acquire the Yellow Land and the relevant part of the Blue Land;\r\n\r\n2.2.2 Compensation for land acquired (including, for the avoidance of doubt, a disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of any land) by the Promoter shall be calculated in accordance with the Compensation Code;\r\n\r\n2.2.3 the Petitioner not objecting to the inclusion of the Yellow Land within an Additional Provision;\r\n\r\n2.2.4 the terms of the agreement binding successors in title to the Petitioners;\r\n\r\n2.2.5 a suitable restriction on the title in respect of the Property being registered at the Land Registry.\r\n\r\n2.3 The conditions referred to in paragraph 2.2 are:\r\n\r\n2.3.1 that the Petitioners are the freehold owners of the Blue Land at the date that the agreement is entered into; and\r\n\r\n2.3.2 the Blue Land is not subject to any lease or tenancy agreement and no such interests will be created by the Petitioners during the currency of the agreement.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Blue Land” means the land edged blue on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“Yellow Land” means the land shaded yellow on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“Plan 1” means the attached plan  [attached to beneficiary letter]bearing reference ‘Plan 1’;\r\n","Acquisition of Land","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to R, P and A Green, assurances 2.2 and 2.3","2018-07-09","Assurance","The land edged blue and the land shaded yellow on Plan 1 attached to the letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C40.8","N/A","HoC/0067","R, P and A Green","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to R, P and A Green, assurance 1","2019-03-05","Assurance","Walton Heath Farm, Common Lane, Stone, Staffordshire, ST15 0BX \r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C40.9","N/A","HoC/0067","R, P and A Green","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to R, P and A Green, assurance 2","2019-03-05","Assurance","Walton Heath Farm, Common Lane, Stone, Staffordshire, ST15 0BX \r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C40.10","N/A","HoC/0067","R, P and A Green","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company),  Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Walton Heath Farm, Common Lane, Stone, Staffordshire, ST15 0BX ","Stafford Borough"]
["C41","Dangerfield, Andrew and William, Alan and Diane","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C41.1","N/A","HoC/0170","Andrew, William, Alan and Diane Dangerfield","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew, William, Alan and Diane Dangerfield, assurance 1","2018-05-31","Assurance","Moreton Farm, Stafford, ST18 0XD and Rosemary Cottage, Stafford, ST18 0XD","Lichfield District"]
["C41.2","N/A","HoC/0170","Andrew, William, Alan and Diane Dangerfield","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew, William, Alan and Diane Dangerfield, assurance 2","2018-05-31","Assurance","Kings Bromley, Riley Hill","Lichfield District"]
["C41.3","N/A","HoC/0170","Andrew, William, Alan and Diane Dangerfield","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Andrew, William, Alan and Diane Dangerfield, assurance 3","2018-05-31","Assurance","Kings Bromley, Riley Hill","Lichfield District"]
["C41.4","N/A","HoC/0170","Andrew, William, Alan and Diane Dangerfield","The Promoter will maintain vehicular access to the petitioners’ property so far as reasonably practicable during construction of the Proposed Scheme. If the access is to be restricted the nominated undertaker will liaise with the petitioner to ensure that any disruption is reduced so far as reasonably practicable.\r\n","Vehicular access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP)","2018-11-13","Assurance","Moreton Farm, Stafford, ST18 0XD and Rosemary Cottage, Stafford, ST18 0XD","Lichfield District"]
["C41.5","N/A","HoC/0170","Andrew, William, Alan and Diane Dangerfield","\r\nThe Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to construct the Accommodation Overbridge to include a carriageway with a minimum width of 5 metres in connection with the construction of the railway.\r\n“In this assurance:\r\n“Accommodation Overbridge” means the Colwich Bridleway 23 Accommodation Green Overbridge forming part of Work No.30 as shown indicatively on plan CT-06-210;\r\n“Work No.30” means the scheduled work as shown on the parliamentary plans deposited with the Bill. \r\n","Accommodation Overbridge","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Julia Hayhurst         (Bagshaws LLP)","2018-12-17","Assurance","Moreton Farm, Stafford, ST18 0XD and Rosemary Cottage, Stafford, ST18 0XD, specifically the Colwich Bridleway 23 Accommodation Green Overbridge forming part of Work No.30 as shown indicatively on plan CT-06-21","Lichfield District"]
["C41.6","N/A","HoC/0170","Andrew, William, Alan and Diane Dangerfield","1.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, in undertaking the detailed design of the A515 Realignment, to give consideration to the Petitioner’s representations in respect of reducing the amount of Land required but shall not make any consequential changes to the detailed design that would or may, in the Secretary of State’s opinion: \r\n1.1.1 affect the nominated undertaker’s compliance with any aspect of the Environmental Minimum Requirements or require any modification to the Works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications; or \r\n1.1.2 require any works or activities on land outwith the limits of deviation in respect of the Bill; or\r\n1.1.3 prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“A515” means the A road known as the ‘A515’ in the vicinity of the Land; \r\n“A515 Realignment” means works to be carried out by the nominated undertaker to realign the A515 pursuant to the Act and Work Number 7;\r\n“Land” means Land Parcel 100b Parish of Kings Bromley;\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale  (Bagshaws LLP)","2019-02-14","Assurance","Land Parcel 100b Parish of Kings Bromley","Lichfield District"]
["C41.7","N/A","HoC/0170","Andrew, William, Alan and Diane Dangerfield","1.1 Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set out in paragraph 1.2 below, the Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Green Land for the purposes of providing wetland habitat creation on the Green Land.\n1.2 The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to:\n(a) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the proposed wetland habitat creation on the Green Land can be relocated to a suitable area that provides equivalence within the proposed scheme without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\n(b) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the removal of the proposed wetland habitat creation on the Green Land can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\n(c) any required planning permission,  and the necessary approval  under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill (conditions of deemed planning permission), being granted by  the local planning authority for the relocation.\nIn this assurance:\n“Green Land” means the land shaded green and labelled ‘Green Land’ on the attached [attached to beneficiary letter] CT-05 and CT-06 maps being part of the land in plot 100a and 100 in the Parish of Kings Bromley in the County of Staffordshire;","Wetland Mitigation Planting ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Julia Hayhurst  (Bagshaws LLP) assurance 1","2019-02-26","Assurance","The land shaded green and labelled ‘Green Land’ on the  CT-05 and CT-06 maps attached to the assurance (part of the land in plot 100a and 100 in the Parish of Kings Bromley in the County of Staffordshire)","Lichfield District"]
["C41.8","N/A","HoC/0170","Andrew, William, Alan and Diane Dangerfield","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in exercise of the powers contained in the Bill to construct the Access Track to include a vehicular carriageway with a minimum width of 5 metres in connection with the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Access Track to Moreton Farm \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Julia Hayhurst (Bagshaws LLP)  assurance 2","2019-02-26","Assurance","The access to Moreton Farm as shown as Work No. 30B on Sheet No 1-21 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill","Lichfield District"]
["C41.9","N/A","HoC/0170","Andrew, William, Alan and Diane Dangerfield","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Julia Hayhurst (Bagshaws LLP), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Moreton Farm, Stafford, ST18 0XD and Rosemary Cottage, Stafford, ST18 0XD","Lichfield District"]
["C42","Mellor, Luke and Son","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C42.1","N/A","HoC/0155","Luke Mellor and Son","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luke Mellor and Son, assurance 1","2018-05-31","Assurance","Manor Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HU","Lichfield District"]
["C42.2","N/A","HoC/0155","Luke Mellor and Son","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luke Mellor and Son, assurance 2","2018-05-31","Assurance","Manor Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HU","Lichfield District"]
["C42.3","N/A","HoC/0155","Luke Mellor and Son","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luke Mellor and Son, assurance 3","2018-05-31","Assurance","Manor Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HU","Lichfield District"]
["C42.4","N/A","HoC/0155","Luke Mellor and Son","1.1. The Secretary of State will, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Green Land for the purposes of providing woodland habitat creation and grassland habitat at those locations, and will require the nominated undertaker introduce an area of hedgerow habitat creation proposed to be located within the Red Land, and shown on the attached plan, Plan No.1, deposited with the Bill, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below. \r\n1.2.The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 is subject to: \r\n(a) The Petitioner entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the construction and maintenance of the woodland habitat creation and grassland habitat creation to be provided on the Blue Land and of the hedgerow habitat creation to be provided on the Red Land, subject to a management and maintenance agreement with the Petitioner and the Secretary of State;\r\n(b) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the habitat creation required to be provided and the nature of the Petitioner’s interest in the land, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of the woodland habitat creation, the grass land habitat creation and the hedgerow habitat creation;\r\n(c) the Blue Land not being subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the construction, maintenance or the objectives of the woodland habitat creation and grassland habitat creation required to be provided on the Blue Land; and\r\n(d) the local planning authority approving the alternative environmental  mitigation scheme  proposed by this assurance under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill and, if required, granting planning permission for the mitigation works required on the blue land without unreasonable conditions and in an acceptable timescale.\r\n1.3. The nominated undertaker will where reasonably practicable modify the design of the balancing pond and access road on the Green Land for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the works.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Blue Land” means the land shown in blue on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being as shown on Replacement Sheet No. 1-19 and Replacement Sheet No. 1-20 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on the plans deposited with the Additional Provision (March 2018), being the area of land outside of Bill limits proposed for environmental habitat creation;\r\n“the Green Land” means the land shown in green on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 113, 114, 116 and 126 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Replacement Sheet No. 1-14 of the plans deposited with the Additional Provision (March 2018), being the area of woodland and grassland habitat creation, an access road, and balancing pond;\r\n“the Red Land” means the land shown in red on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 113, 114, 116 and 126 in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Replacement Sheet No. 1-14 of the plans deposited with the Additional Provision (March 2018), being the area of land proposed for hedgerow habitat creation;","Mitigation Planting","Letter from Oliver Bayne (NA) to Luke Mellor and Son, assurance 1","2018-06-18","Assurance","Manor Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HU","Lichfield District"]
["C42.5","N/A","HoC/0155","Luke Mellor and Son","1. The Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with the Petitioner, where a business case is approved and where it relates to the provision of funding for additional land that may be necessary for the Petitioner’s farm business in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Promoter of land required for that business, such agreement to provide that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Promoter being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured.\r\n","Business case for additional land ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luke Mellor and Son, assurance 1","2018-06-19","Assurance","Manor Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HU","Lichfield District"]
["C42.6","N/A","HoC/0155","Luke Mellor and Son","1. Objective\r\nAppropriate Representative of the Promoter and the Petitioner will form a working group to collaborate to consider how organic farming activities at Manor Farm can reasonably be maintained during construction of the Proposed Scheme and any restoration period thereafter.\r\n2. Duration\r\nThe working group is to be established as soon as reasonably practicable and will meet until the opening of the House of Lords petitioning period, which is yet to be announced.\r\n3. Meetings\r\nThe working group shall meet at least once every quarter with additional meetings scheduled as necessary. The meetings will be chaired by the Head of Acquisitions.\r\n4. Terms of Reference\r\nThe members agree to develop a terms of reference for the working group as soon as reasonably practicable.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“the Head of Acquisitions” means Michael Eckett or one of his direct reports or any successor which shall be communicated in advance to the Representative\r\n","Working group\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luke Mellor and Son, assurances 1 to 4","2018-06-19","Assurance","Manor Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HU","Lichfield District"]
["C42.7","N/A","HoC/0155","Luke Mellor and Son","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Manor Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3HU","Lichfield District"]
["C43","Jolliffe, Mark and Wendy","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C43.1","N/A","HoC/0066","Mark and Wendy Jolliffe","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mark and Wendy Jolliffe, assurance 1","2018-05-31","Assurance","Yarlet Hall Farm, ST18 9SD","Stafford Borough"]
["C43.2","N/A","HoC/0066","Mark and Wendy Jolliffe","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mark and Wendy Jolliffe, assurance 2","2018-05-31","Assurance","Yarlet Hall Farm, ST18 9SD","Stafford Borough"]
["C43.3","N/A","HoC/0066","Mark and Wendy Jolliffe","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mark and Wendy Jolliffe, assurance 3","2018-05-31","Assurance","Yarlet Hall Farm, ST18 9SD","Stafford Borough"]
["C43.4","N/A","HoC/0066","Mark and Wendy Jolliffe","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mark and Wendy Jolliffe, assurance 1","2019-02-14","Assurance","Yarlet Hall Farm, ST18 9SD","Stafford Borough"]
["C43.5","N/A","HoC/0066","Mark and Wendy Jolliffe","2.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2  The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mark and Wendy Jolliffe, assurance 2","2019-02-14","Assurance","Yarlet Hall Farm, ST18 9SD\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C43.6","N/A","HoC/0066","Mark and Wendy Jolliffe","3.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n•  a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 3.2) \r\n• following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n3.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 3.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n3.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n3.4  The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mark and Wendy Jolliffe, assurance 3","2019-02-14","Assurance","Yarlet Hall Farm, ST18 9SD","Stafford Borough"]
["C43.7","N/A","HoC/0066","Mark and Wendy Jolliffe","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Yarlet Hall Farm, ST18 9SD","Stafford Borough"]
["C44","Swinnerton, Stephen John (deceased)","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C44.1","N/A","HoC/0181","Stephen John Swinnerton (deceased)","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Stephen John Swinnerton, assurance 1","2018-05-31","Assurance","New House Farm, Rugeley,\r\nWS15 3HY ","Stafford Borough"]
["C44.2","N/A","HoC/0181","Stephen John Swinnerton (deceased)","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Stephen John Swinnerton, assurance 2","2018-05-31","Assurance","New House Farm, Rugeley,\r\nWS15 3HY ","Stafford Borough"]
["C44.3","N/A","HoC/0181","Stephen John Swinnerton (deceased)","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\nThe assurances referred to in this letter apply to you and members of your immediate family who inherit title to the property (New House Farm and Blithbury Reindeer Lodge, Uttoxeter Road, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire).\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Stephen John Swinnerton, assurance 3","2018-05-31","Assurance","New House Farm, Rugeley,\r\nWS15 3HY ","Stafford Borough"]
["C44.4","N/A","HoC/0181","Stephen John Swinnerton (deceased)","1.1.\tThe Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to:\r\n1.1.1.\treplace hedgerow lost as a result of the works to realign the B5014 Uttoxeter Road as shown on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n1.2.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 1.3. below:\r\n1.2.1.       engage with the Landowner during detailed design of the Proposed Scheme with the aim of retaining as much of the hedgerow as reasonably practicable near to the Landowner’s Property;\r\n1.3.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.2. are that:              \r\n1.3.1.\tthe retention of the hedgerow is possible during and following the works to realign the   B5014 Uttoxeter Road;\r\n1.3.2.\tthe ecological condition of the hedgerow and\r\n1.3.3.\tany approval by the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill required being secured.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Landowner” means Stephen Swinnerton;\r\n“the Landowner’s Property” means New House Farm and Blithbury Reindeer Lodge, Uttoxeter Road, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire;\r\n","Hedgerow","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Charles Meynell, Fisher German","2019-03-14","Assurance","New House Farm, Rugeley,\r\nWS15 3HY ","Stafford Borough"]
["C44.5","N/A","HoC/0181","Stephen John Swinnerton (deceased)","1. Subject to the conditions at paragraph 1.3, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to use reasonable endeavours to:\r\n 1.1. replace hedgerow lost as a result of the works to realign the B5014 Uttoxeter Road as shown on the attached plan; and\r\n 1.2. engage with the Landowner with the aim of retaining as much of the hedgerow as reasonably practicable near to the Property.\r\n 1.3. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that:              \r\n1.3.1. the retention of the hedgerow is possible during and following the works to realign the  B5014 Uttoxeter Road;\r\n 1.3.2.\tthe ecological condition of the hedgerow is capable of being retained; and\r\n 1.3.3.\tany approval by the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill required being secured.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Landowner” means Stephen Swinnerton and members of his immediate family who inherit title to the Property;\r\n“the Property” means New House Farm and Blithbury Reindeer Lodge, Uttoxeter Road, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire.\r\n\r\n","Hedgerow","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Charles Meynell, (Fisher German), assurance 1","2019-04-16","Assurance","New House Farm, Rugeley,\r\nWS15 3HY ","Stafford Borough"]
["C44.6","N/A","HoC/0181","Stephen John Swinnerton (deceased)","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Charles Meynell, (Fisher German), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","New House Farm, Rugeley,\r\nWS15 3HY ","Stafford Borough"]
["C45","Fielding, J A and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C45.1","N/A","HoC/0072","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms, assurance 1 ","2018-05-31","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.2","N/A","HoC/0072","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n·A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n·A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n·A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n·Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n·Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n·Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n·Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n·A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n·A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms, assurance 2 ","2018-05-31","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.3","N/A","HoC/0072","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms, assurance 3 ","2018-05-31","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.4","N/A","HoC/0072","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms","1.1 The Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Yellow Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the condition in paragraph 1.2. \r\n1.2 The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to:\r\n(a) the Promoter being satisfied that the ecological mitigation, which was provided on a precautionary basis, can be removed from the scheme design without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n(b) the Promoter being of the view that the removal of the ecological mitigation can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n(c) is subject to consent from local planning authority\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Yellow Land” means the land block coloured yellow on the attached plan (Plan A) being part of the land in plot 1 in the Parish of Kings Bromley in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Replacement Sheet Nos. 1-02 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Additional Provision (March 2018);\r\n“the Green Land” means both the land edged green and block coloured green on the attached plans (Plans B, C and D) being part of the land in plots 6, 7, 8 in the Parish of Alrewas, and plots 1, 7, 16a, 16b, 26, 35, 38 and AP1-2 in the Parish of Kings Bromley in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Replacement Sheet Nos. 1-02 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Additional Provision (March 2018); \r\n“the Blue Land” means both the land edged blue and block coloured blue on the attached plans (Plans B, C and D) and being part of the land in plots 8 and 11 in the Parish of Alrewas, and 16a, 26, 38, and 51 in the Parish of Kings Bromley in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Replacement Sheet Nos. 1-02 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Additional Provision (March 2018);\r\n","Ecological mitigation – great crested newts \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms, assurance 1 ","2018-06-05","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.5","N/A","HoC/0072","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms","2.1 The Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Green Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the condition in paragraph 2.2 below.\r\n2.2 The assurance in paragraph 2.1 is subject to:\r\n(a) the nominated undertaker being satisfied that the ecological mitigation can be delivered at the Green and Blue Land without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n(b) the nominated undertaker securing any and all necessary consents for delivering the ecological mitigation at the alternative sites within 9 months of Royal Assent;\r\n(c) the nominated undertaker concluding that the ecological mitigation can be delivered at the alternative sites without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n(d) the final design of the relocated mitigation will be subject to the borrow pit scheme approved by the local planning authority under paragraph 8 of Schedule 17 of the Bill.\r\n","Ecological mitigation relocation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms, assurance 2 ","2018-06-05","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.6","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms","The Promoter is currently in active negotiations with adjoining land owners in order to mitigate Mrs Fielding’s concerns, and will be working with the petitioner throughout detailed design in accordance with the directions of the Select Committee to ensure her concerns are resolved as far as reasonably practicable [directions of the Select Committee indicated at paragraph 61].\r\n","Detailed design","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's Second Special Report of Session  2017 - 2019, paragraph 62","2018-11-13","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.7","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","1.1\tSubject to paragraph 1.2 below, the Secretary of State shall not exercise any permanent acquisition or temporary possession powers conferred by the Bill over the Property or any part of the Property for any purposes in connection with the excavation of materials from Borrow Pit 1 Area A.\r\n1.2\tParagraph 1.1 above does not preclude the Secretary of State from exercising any permanent acquisition or temporary possession powers conferred by the Bill over the Property or any part of the Property for any purposes in connection with:-\r\n1.2.1\tthe construction, operation and maintenance on, under or over the Property of any utility diversion works required for the Proposed Scheme; and/or\r\n1.2.2\tthe carrying out of the Dewatering Activities on the Property as may be required to facilitate the Nominated Undertaker’s operation of Borrow Pit 1 Area B for the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“Area A” means that part of the property shown coloured pink and red on Plan 1;\r\n“Area B” means that part of the property shown coloured yellow on Plan 2;\r\n“Borrow Pit 1” means the area of the borrow pit identified on Plan 1 as Borrow Pit 1 Western Section (189A) that is located within plot 38 in the Parish of Kings Bromley as shown on the deposited plans as deposited with the Bill; \r\n“the Dewatering Activities” means any activities required to be carried out in connection with:\r\na)\tthe process of dewatering Borrow Pit 1 Area B;\r\nb)\tthe management of water generated from the process of dewatering Borrow Pit 1 Area B; and\r\nc)\tthe recharging into the ground of water generated from the process of dewatering Borrow Pit 1 Area B;\r\n“Petitioner”\tmeans J A Fielding and B Stoney of J A Fielding Farms, Woodend Farm Riley Hill, Lichfield, WS13 8HR;\r\n“Plan 1”\tmeans the plan attached to this assurance with the title Plan 1;\r\n“Plan 2”\tmeans the plan attached to this assurance with the title Plan 2.\r\n\r\n","Assurance on Borrow Pit 1 Western Section (189A) ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead (Knight Frank)","2019-04-18","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.8","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","1.1\tPrior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill that are proposed to be constructed on or operated from any part of the Property for the purposes of the operation of the Borrow Pit, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the Nominated Undertaker’s preparation of the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology.\r\n1.2\tThe Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation under paragraph 1.1 above and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors including but not limited to the relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.4 below associated with the design, construction, operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit,\r\n1.2.1\tseek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2\tseek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding operated by the Petitioner on or from the Property during the period of the excavation of the Borrow Pit by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.3\tNothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the environmental statement for the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.4\tThe relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.2 above are:-\r\n1.4.1\tany requirements of the local planning authority for the approval of the operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit under Schedule 17 of the Bill;\r\n1.4.2\tthe safe, timely and economic operation of the Borrow Pit;\r\n1.4.3\tcompliance with other relevant undertakings and assurances; and \r\n1.4.4\tthe safe, timely and economic delivery of any other works for the Proposed Scheme connected with, or within the vicinity of, the Borrow Pit.”\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“the Borrow Pit” means the borrow pit identified on Plan 1 as Borrow Pit 1 Eastern Section (189) and located within plot 51 in the Parish of Kings Bromley;\r\n“Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology”\tmeans the methodology for the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which shall include the following:-\r\na)\tInformation on the method or methods for the extraction of materials from any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property;\r\nb)\tInformation on any other works and/or activities required in connection with the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which are to be constructed and/or undertaken on or from the Property, and\r\nc)\tInformation on any sequencing of material extraction operations for any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property;\r\n“Petitioner”\tmeans J A Fielding and B Stoney of J A Fielding Farms, Woodend Farm Riley Hill, Lichfield, WS13 8HR;\r\n“Plan 1”\tmeans the plan attached to this assurance highlighted yellow with the title Plan 1 and also known as ‘Area B’);\r\n“the Property”\tmeans the land and buildings owned by the Petitioner situated within the Act limits (as defined in the Bill) located at Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Assurance on Borrow Pit 1 Eastern Section (189A) ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead (Knight Frank)","2019-04-18","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.9","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, (Knight Frank), assurance 1","2019-04-24","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.10","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","2.1\tNotwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n2.2\tNotwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n2.3\tFollowing the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, (Knight Frank), assurance 2","2019-04-24","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.11","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","3.1 \tThe Promoter acknowledges that proper professional costs and fees reasonably incurred by the Petitioner for the purposes of seeking to identify suitable alternative premises at which to relocate an agricultural building which is subject to the power of compulsory acquisition under the Bill, will form a Head of Claim as part of any disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of that land under the Bill.\r\n","Professional costs and fees ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, (Knight Frank), assurance 3","2019-04-24","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.12","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","4.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will engage with the owner and occupier of the land with respect to the particular purpose(s) he expects to exercise the powers under clause 14 of the Bill, the type of vehicle(s) to be used, the purpose of the use and the expected frequency and period of use.\r\n","Use of private roads ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to (Tim Broomhead, Knight Frank),  assurance 4","2019-04-24","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.13","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","5.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n5.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n5.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n5.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n5.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n5.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, (Knight Frank), assurance 5","2019-04-24","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.14","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","6.1 \tPrior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of  State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n6.2 \tThe Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 6.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n6.2.1\tseek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n6.2.2 \tseek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n6.3 \tIn this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n6.4 \tNothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, (Knight Frank), assurance 6","2019-04-24","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.15","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","7.1 \tThe Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n•\ta pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n•\ta target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n•\ta method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n•\tadvice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n•\trecommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n•\tadvice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n•\tadvice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n•\ta schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 7.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n•\ta final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n7.2 \tShould the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 7.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n7.3 \tThe reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n7.4 \tThe agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of \tConstruction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, (Knight Frank), assurance 7","2019-04-24","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.16","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","1.1\tThe Secretary of State acknowledges that Option 7 has potential to reduce the impacts of the Proposed Scheme during construction while delivering similar benefits during operation.  The Landowners have been consulted on Option 7 and have indicated that they may be prepared to make land available by agreement to enable Option 7 to be implemented. \r\n1.2\tIn the event that the Secretary of State requires the nominated undertaker to seek to implement Option 7 the nominated undertaker will be required to continue its engagement with the Landowners in relation to the design development of the Option 7 proposals. \r\n1.3\tShould the design development and Landowner engagement suggest that Option 7 is capable of being brought forward instead of Work No.7D without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme (and for the avoidance of doubt the nominated undertaker will construct Work No.7D if it deems Option 7 cannot be delivered), the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to:\r\n1.3.1.\tdevelop an alignment substantially in accordance with the Option 7 alignment as shown indicatively on Plan 1;\r\n1.3.2.\tduring detailed design of Option 7 seek to reduce, so far as reasonably practicable, the amount of the Landowners’ land required for Option 7 on the Kings Bromley side of the Option 7 alignment and seek to reduce the footprint of the operational Option 7 permanent alignment so far as is reasonably practicable having regard to the nature and purpose of Option 7;\r\n1.3.3.\tprovide a suitable form of access to the Landowners’ land on the Kings Bromley side of the Option 7 permanent alignment; \r\n1.3.4.\tenter into an agreement with the Landowners in relation to the construction, operation and maintenance of Option 7; and\r\n1.3.5.\timplement Option 7 instead of implementing Work No.7D.\r\n1.4.\tThe agreement referred to at paragraph 1.3.4 above must include the following requirements:\r\n1.4.1.\tthe nominated undertaker will not seek to permanently acquire land that is required only for the construction of Option 7; \r\n1.4.2.\tthe Landowners must grant the nominated undertaker all necessary rights and facilities required in relation to the construction, operation and maintenance of Option 7; and\r\n1.4.3.\tthe Landowners must be freehold owners of the Property and able to convey the Property with vacant possession. \r\n1.5.\tThe assurances given in this paragraph 1 are subject to:\r\n1.5.1.\tthe nominated undertaker obtaining all the necessary consents, including any consent or agreement required under the Highways Act 1980, required to implement Option 7, with any conditions placed on the nominated undertaker able to be reasonably implementable;\r\n1.5.2.       the nominated undertaker identifying a suitable alternative site within the Act limits (as defined by the Bill), which can be used for relocation of the mitigation planting in the vicinity of the proposed new roundabout at the junction of the A515 Lichfield Road/A513 Rugeley Road;\r\n1.5.3.\tthe nominated undertaker being able to secure the necessary rights to the Property on reasonable terms pursuant to the agreement referred to at paragraph 1.3.4 above; \r\n1.5.4\tthe nominated undertaker concluding that Option 7 can be delivered without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme; and \r\n1.5.5.\tthe nominated undertaker, during detailed design, not being prevented from constructing an alternative bridleway link between Common Lane and Work No. 7B, which would otherwise connect with Work No. 7D;\r\nand nothing in these assurances requires the Secretary of State to promote an Additional Provision in relation to Option 7.”\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“Landowners” means David and Hazel Cliffe of DT Cliffe Farming, Common Farm, Bromley Hayes, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13 8JE and Joy A Fielding of J A Fielding Farms, Woodend Farm, Riley Hill, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13 8HR;\r\n“Option 7” means the proposal being considered by the nominated undertaker for an alternative solution to seek to address issues at Common Lane as a result of the Proposed Scheme involving the construction of a new permanent road linking the A515 Lichfield Road to Crawley Lane on the alignment shown indicatively on Plan 1; \r\n“the Property” means the land required for the construction, operation and maintenance of Option 7 as indicatively shown outlined in purple on Plan 1; \r\n“Plan 1” means the plan attached to this agreement;\r\n“Work No.7D” means a diversion of Common Lane commencing at a point 480 metres east of the bridge carrying the A515 Lichfield Road over Bourne Brook and terminating by a junction with Work No. 7 at a point 370 metres south-west of the junction of the A513 Rugeley Road with the A515 Lichfield Road. Work No. 7D includes a bridge over Bourne Brook as described at Schedule 1 to the Bill and proposed in Additional Provision 2; and\r\n“Work No.7B” means  an access road commencing at a point 380 metres northeast of the junction of Shaw Lane with the A515 Lichfield Road and terminating at a point 85 metres north-east of its commencement as described at Schedule 1 to the Bill.\r\n","Option 7 Development","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead (Knight Frank), assurance 1","2019-04-25","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.17","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","1.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 2 being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to relocate the Wetland Habitat Creation to the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Woodland Habitat Creation to the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land.  \r\n2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that:\r\na.\tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the Wetland Habitat Creation can be delivered on the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Woodland Habitat Creation can be delivered on the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill; \r\n b.\tthe proprietor and the freehold owner of the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land entering into an agreement with the Secretary of State on  terms satisfactory to the Secretary of State by 31 March 2020 which provides for either \r\ni.\tthe transfer of the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land to the Secretary of State; or\r\n ii.\tthe grant to the Secretary of State of any and all necessary rights over the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land (including rights of access at all times and for all purposes) sufficient to enable the Secretary of State to use the land for the wetland habitat creation and the woodland habitat creation and provides for the ongoing management and maintenance by the Proprietor and/or freehold owner of the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land and which provides for the Secretary of State to access, maintain and manage the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land in the event of any non-compliance by the Proprietor and/or freehold owner to carry out the management and maintenance of the habitat creation; \r\n c.\tthe Secretary of State securing any and all necessary consents for delivering the habitat mitigation on the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land within a timescale consistent with the Promoter delivering the relocation within the construction period for the Proposed Scheme. The nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to obtain consents within this timescale; and\r\nd.\tthe Secretary of State being of the view that the relocation of the habitat mitigation to the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme and can be delivered within the construction programme for the Proposed Scheme. \r\n3.\tNothing in this assurance shall prevent the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred by the Bill over the Wetland Habitat Creation and the Woodland Habitat Creation for the purposes of the habitat mitigation:\r\n(a)\tin the event that the conditions in paragraph 2 are not satisfied; and\r\n(b)\tto the extent that the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land are insufficient to accommodate the habitat mitigation.\r\n4.1  The Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Pink Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the condition in paragraph 4.2.\r\n4.2\tThe assurance in paragraph 4.1 is subject to:\r\n(a) the Promoter being satisfied that the ecological mitigation, which was provided on a precautionary basis, can be removed from the scheme design without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n(b) the Promoter being of the view that the removal of the ecological mitigation can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n(c) is subject to consent from local planning authority.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land” means the land shown Yellow on the Plan which is suitable to be used for wetland habitat creation; \r\n “Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land” means the land shown Purple on the Plan which is suitable to be used for woodland habitat creation;\r\n“Wetland Habitat Creation” means the land to be used for wetland habitat creation under the Bill shown as Turquoise on the Plan and being land in Plot 1 in the Parish of Kings Bromley on Replacement Sheets 1-01 and 1-02 annexed to these assurances.'\r\n“Woodland Habitat Creation” means the land to be used for woodland habitat creation under the Bill shown as Magenta on the Plan and being land in Plots 1, 16a and 26 in the Parish of Kings Bromley on Replacement Sheets 1-01 and 1-02 annexed to these assurances.","Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation and Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, (Knight Frank), assurances 1 to 4","2019-04-26","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.18","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","5.1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioners in locating the Pyford Brook Satellite Compound within plot 1 of Kings Bromley on the Replacement Sheet 1-02 annexed to these assurances, subject to the satisfaction of the condition in paragraph 5.2.\r\n5.2 The assurance is given subject to detailed design and the Promoter being satisfied that any relocation does not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Satellite Compound\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, (Knight Frank), assurance 5","2019-04-26","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.19","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","6. The Promoter shall not exercise any powers in the Bill over plots 29, 30 ,31,15 and 17 in Parish of Kings Bromley and in respect of part of plot 1 in Parish of Kings Bromley as edged mauve on the Replacement Sheet 1-02 annexed to these assurances.","Access\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, (Knight Frank), assurance 6","2019-04-26","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.20","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","7. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to retain the existing hedgerows at plots 8 and 11 in Parish of Alrewas and at plot  1,16a, 26 and 38  in Parish of Kings Bromley as edged orange on the Replacement Sheet 1-02 annexed to these assurances.\r\n","Hedgerows\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, (Knight Frank), assurance 7","2019-04-26","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.21","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","8. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioners  in relation to the location of grassland habitat creation within plot 16a, AP1-2 and 26 in Parish of Kings Bromley as coloured blue on Replacement Sheet 1-02 annexed to these assurances.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Blue Land” means the land coloured blue on the Plan and being land in Plots 16a, AP1-2 and 26 in Parish of Kings Bromley as shown on Replacement Sheet No. 102 annexed to these assurances.\r\n","Grassland\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, (Knight Frank), assurance 8","2019-04-26","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.22","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","9. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioners in relation to the temporary laydown area within plot AP1-1 in the Parish of Kings Bromley on the Replacement Sheet 1-02 annexed to these assurances.\r\n","Temporary Laydown area\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, (Knight Frank), assurance 9","2019-04-26","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.23","N/A","HoC/0072, AP1/0012, AP2/0023","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Joy Fielding","2019-07-08","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.24","N/A","HoL/0019","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","4.1\tThe Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the   Bill in relation to the Pink Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the condition in paragraph 4.2.\r\n4.2\tThe assurance in paragraph 4.1 is subject to:\r\na.\tthe Secretary of State being satisfied that the ecological mitigation, which was provided on a precautionary basis, can be removed from the Proposed Scheme design without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\nb.\tthe Secretary of State being of the view that the removal of the ecological mitigation can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\nc.\t is subject to consent from local planning authority.\r\nIn these assurances\r\n\r\n“the Pink Land” means the land to be used for grassland habitat creation under the Bill shown as Pink on the Plan and being land in Plot 1 in the Parish of Kings Bromley in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Replacement Sheet No. 1-02 annexed to these assurances;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n\r\n“the Secretary of State” means the Secretary of State for Transport;\r\n“the Environmental Statement”  means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme, including any supplementary environmental statement, and accompanying the Bill;\r\n\r\n","Ecological mitigation – Great Crested Newts\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Joy Fielding and B Stoney, assurance 4","2019-11-05","Assurance","the land to be used for grassland habitat creation under the Bill shown as Pink on the Plan and being land in Plot 1 in the Parish of Kings Bromley in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Replacement Sheet No. 1-02","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.25","N/A","HoL/0019","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","5.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioners regarding the relocation of  the Pyford Brook Satellite Compound within plot 1 on  Replacement Sheet 1-02 annexed to these assurances, subject to the satisfaction of the condition in paragraph 5.2.\r\n5.2 The assurance is given subject to detailed design and the Secretary of State being satisfied that any relocation does not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Secretary of State” means the Secretary of State for Transport;\r\n“the Environmental Statement”  means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme, including any supplementary environmental statement, and accompanying the Bill;\r\n","Satellite Compound\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Joy Fielding and B Stoney, assurance 5","2019-11-05","Assurance","the Pyford Brook Satellite Compound within plot 1 on  Replacement Sheet 1-02","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.26","N/A","HoL/0019","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","6. The Secretary of State will not exercise the compulsory acquisition powers conferred by the Bill over plots 29, 30, 31, 15 and 17 as edged mauve and over that part of plot 1 also edged mauve on the Replacement Sheet 1-02 annexed to these assurances.\r\n","Access\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Joy Fielding and B Stoney, assurance 6","2019-11-05","Assurance","plots 29, 30, 31, 15 and 17 as edged mauve and over that part of plot 1 also edged mauve on the Replacement Sheet 1-02","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.27","N/A","HoL/0019","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","7. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to retain the existing hedgerows located at plots 8 and 11 and at plots 1,16a, 26 and 38 as are edged orange on the Replacement Sheet 1-02 annexed to these assurances.\r\n","Hedgerows\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Joy Fielding and B Stoney, assurance 7","2019-11-05","Assurance","plots 8 and 11 and at plots 1,16a, 26 and 38 as are edged orange on the Replacement Sheet 1-02","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.28","N/A","HoL/0019","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","8. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to minimise the loss of Existing Woodland, subject to the Secretary of State being of the view that minimising the loss of Existing Woodland does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme. \r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n\r\n“the Existing Woodland” means the area of existing woodland within Plots 16a and 26 in the Parish of Kings Bromley on Replacement Sheet 1-02 annexed to these assurances","Existing Woodland\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Joy Fielding and B Stoney, assurance 8","2019-11-05","Assurance","Woodend Farm, Lichfield, \r\nWS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.29","N/A","HoL/0019","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","9. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to engage with the Petitioners regarding the period of use of plot AP1-1 (as shown on Replacement Sheet 1-02 annexed to these assurances) as a  temporary laydown area for the construction of the Proposed Scheme \r\nIn these assurances:\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n","Temporary Laydown area\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Joy Fielding and B Stoney, assurance 9","2019-11-05","Assurance","the period of use of plot AP1-1 (as shown on Replacement Sheet 1-02","Stafford Borough"]
["C45.30","N/A","HoL/0019","J A Fielding and J A Fielding Farms and B Stoney","1. Subject to the conditions in paragraph 2 being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to relocate the Wetland Habitat Creation (for the avoidance of doubt, excluding the Blue Land which is required for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme) to the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Woodland Habitat Creation to the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land.\r\n\r\n2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that: \r\na. the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Wetland Habitat Creation can be delivered on the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Woodland Habitat Creation can be delivered on the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill; \r\nb. the Freehold Owner entering into an agreement with the Secretary of State on terms satisfactory to the Secretary of State by 31 March 2021 which provides for the transfer of the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land to the Secretary of State;\r\nc. the Secretary of State securing any and all necessary consents for delivering the habitat mitigation on the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land within a timescale consistent with the nominated undertaker delivering the relocation within the construction period for the Proposed Scheme. The nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to obtain consents within this timescale;  \r\nd. the Secretary of State being of the view that the relocation of the habitat mitigation to the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme and can be delivered within the construction programme for the Proposed Scheme; \r\ne. any required approval under paragraph 9 of schedule 17 to the Bill is obtained; and\r\nf. all required landowners enter into the Existing Hedgerow Enhancement Agreement.\r\n\r\n3. Nothing in these assurances shall prevent the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred by the Bill over the Wetland Habitat Creation and the Woodland Habitat Creation for the purposes of the habitat mitigation: \r\na. in the event that the conditions in paragraph 2 are not satisfied; and \r\nb. to the extent that the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land and the Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land are insufficient to accommodate the habitat mitigation required for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land” and “Alternative Woodland Habitat Creation Land” means the land shown indicatively coloured Red on Plan 1 which is suitable to be used for wetland habitat creation and woodland habitat creation;\r\n“Blue Land” means the land shown in blue on Plan 2 and Plan 3 that is required for the purposes of wetland habitat creation in relation to the Proposed Scheme and is not proposed to be relocated pursuant to this assurance with the intention that the habitat creation on this land will be integrated with the existing planting in the vicinity of Pyford Brook with the aim of enhancing the quality of the habitat without removing existing planting along Pyford Brook;\r\n“Existing Hedgerow Enhancement Agreement” means an agreement between the Secretary of State and/or the nominated undertaker and all required landowners that is in terms that are satisfactory to the Secretary of State that would require the enhancement of the existing hedgerow and 5m buffer on either side of that hedgerow as shown as a Green line on Plan 2 for the purposes of providing ecological connectivity. In negotiating the agreement with the landowner(s) the Secretary of State and/or the nominated undertaker will have regard to existing utilities, maintenance of existing efficient farming operations of the landowner(s) and will seek to reduce so far as reasonably possible the extent of enhancements required having regard to the existing condition of the hedgerow;\r\n“the Freehold Owner” means the freehold owner(s) of the land shown coloured Red on Plan 1 which is proposed as the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation and the Alternative Wetland Habitat Creation Land; \r\n “Plan 1” means the plan attached to these assurances with drawing reference “Plan 1”; \r\n“Plan 2” means the plan attached to these assurances with drawing reference “Plan 2”;\r\n“Plan 3” means the plan attached to these assurances with drawing reference “Plan 3”;\r\n“Wetland Habitat Creation” and “Woodland Habitat Creation” means the land to be used for wetland habitat creation and woodland habitat creation under the Bill shown Yellow on Plan 2 and Plan 3 and in the Parish of Kings Bromley\r\n\r\n","Relocate wetland\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Joy Fielding and B Stoney, assurances 1 to 3","2020-07-10","Assurance","in the vicinity of Pyford Brook ","Stafford Borough"]
["C46","Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C46.1","N/A","HoC/0141","Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council","1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker as far as is reasonably practicable to: \r\n(a) design and construct the realigned Manor Road; and,\r\n(b) design, construct, operate and maintain the operational HS2 railway, \r\nso that the combined airborne noise from the realigned Manor Road and the operational HS2 railway predicted in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances, does not exceed the lowest observed adverse effect levels set out in Table 2 of Appendix B of HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper E9: Control of Airborne Noise. \r\nFor the purposes of paragraph 1 of this assurance, the “external amenity spaces” criterion in Table 2 of Appendix B, with a noise impact level of 55 dB LpAeq. (0700-2300 hrs), applies to Madeley Cemetery.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Newcastle Under Lyme Borough Council, assurance 1","2018-06-04","Assurance","Manor Road and Madeley Cemetery","Newcastle-under-Lyme"]
["C46.2","N/A","HoC/0141","Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council","2.  The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consider during detailed design opportunities to provide additional landscape mitigation planting on land within the Act limits (as defined by the Bill) between the Madeley Cemetery and the proposed Manor Road Overbridge for the purposes of providing additional visual screening of the proposed Manor Road Overbridge from the Madeley Cemetery.  The provision of such additional landscape mitigation planting is subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 3. \r\n3. The conditions referred to in Paragraph 2 are as follows:\r\na) The nominated undertaker securing all necessary consents and approvals for the provision of the additional landscape mitigation planting described in paragraph 2 as may be required from the local highway authority and/or the local planning authority under Schedules 4 and 17 of the Bill; and\r\nb) The nominated undertaker being satisfied that the provision of the additional landscape mitigation planting described in paragraph 2 would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic construction and/or operation of the Proposed Scheme. \r\n4. Where any additional landscape mitigation planting is provided by the nominated undertaker in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 of this assurance the Secretary of State will also require the nominated undertaker to ensure that it is maintained as if it were covered by HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper E20: Maintenance of Landscaped Areas or HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper E7: Future Highway Maintenance Responsibilities as may be applicable.\r\n","Landscape mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Newcastle Under Lyme Borough Council, assurances 2 to 4","2018-06-04","Assurance","Manor Road and Madeley Cemetery","Newcastle-under-Lyme"]
["C46.3","N/A","HoC/0141","Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council","1.1  The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to ensure that no Large Goods Vehicle construction traffic related to the Proposed Scheme will pass through Madeley Conservation Area, except where:\r\ni) the use of roads within the Madeley Conservation Area is required to be used for access to local suppliers or businesses premises;\r\nii) in circumstances where it is required to do so by the relevant planning authority under the powers conferred on it by paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill; \r\niii) there is a need to undertake work related to utilities; or\r\niv) in the case of an emergency or if directed to do so by the police or emergency services; or\r\nv) where, it would prejudice the safe, timely and economic construction and/or operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n 1.2  The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to avoid applying for approval for the use of the part of the A525 that goes through the Madeley Conservation Area as a construction route for Large Goods Vehicles for the Proposed Scheme under Schedule 17 of the Bill where reasonably practicable.\r\n1.3 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances to use the haul routes indicated on the attached plan (Netherset Hay Farm Borrow Pit indicative haul roads) for: \r\ni) the removal of all material that is excavated from the Netherset Hey Borrow Pit; and \r\nii) the importation of as much fill material to that borrow pit as is reasonably practicable.\r\n1.4  For the avoidance of doubt the assurances in 1.1, and 1.3 relate to the Petitioner’s desire to limit Large Goods Vehicle construction traffic, including that travelling to and from the Netherset Hay Farm Borrow Pit, passing through the Madeley Conservation Area.  They do not prevent the Promoter from using other public highways in conjunction with the haul roads, subject to gaining any necessary consents under Schedule 17 of the Bill\r\n","Vehicular access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Newcastle Under Lyme Borough Council, assurance 1","2018-06-05","Assurance","Manor Road and Madeley Cemetery","Newcastle-under-Lyme"]
["C47","Cliffe, Hazel and David","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C47.1","N/A","HoC/0082","Hazel and David Cliffe","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the extent of woodland habitat creation to no more than 1.7ha in the Blue Land, as shown indicatively in Appendix 1 [attached to beneficiary letter].\r\nThis assurance is subject to the following conditions:\r\ni. the proposed change not prejudicing compliance with any aspect of the Environmental Minimum Requirements;\r\nii. the proposed change not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\niii. the proposed change not requiring the acquisition of any land outside of the Petitioner’s land ownership; and\r\niv. approval of the  proposed change by the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule  17 to the Bill.\r\n","Woodland habitat creation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Hazel and David Cliffe (and J A Fielding)","2018-05-31","Assurance","The Blue Land, as show indicatively in Appendix 1  attached to the letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C47.2","N/A","HoC/0082","Hazel and David Cliffe","1.1\tPrior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill that are proposed to be constructed on or operated from any part of the Property for the purposes of the operation of the Borrow Pit, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the Nominated Undertaker’s preparation of the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology.\r\n1.2\tThe Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation under paragraph 1.1 above and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors including but not limited to the relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.4 below associated with the design, construction, operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit,\r\n1.2.1\tseek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2\tseek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding operated by the Petitioner on or from the Property during the period of the excavation of the Borrow Pit by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.3\tNothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the environmental statement for the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“the Borrow Pit”  means the borrow pit identified on Plan 1 and Plan 2 as Borrow Pit 2 (190) and located within plot 134a in the Parish of Kings Bromley;\r\n“Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology”\tmeans the methodology for the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which shall include the following:-\r\na)\tInformation on the method or methods for the extraction of materials from any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property;\r\nb)\tInformation on any other works and/or activities required in connection with the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which are to be constructed and/or undertaken on or from the Property, and\r\nc)\tInformation on any sequencing of material extraction operations for any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property;\r\n“Petitioner”\tmeans David and Hazel Cliffe of DT Cliffe Farming, Common Farm, Bromley Hayes, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13 8JE; \r\n“Plan 1”\tmeans the plan attached to this assurance highlighted yellow with the title Plan 1;\r\n“Plan 2”\tmeans the plan attached to this assurance highlighted yellow with the title Plan 2;\r\n“the Property”\tmeans the land and buildings owned by the Petitioner situated within the Act limits (as defined in the Bill) located at Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF.\r\n\r\n","Assurance on Borrow Pit 2 (190) – Common Farm\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Hazel and David Cliffe ","2019-04-18","Assurance","Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF;","Stafford Borough"]
["C47.3","N/A","HoC/0082","Hazel and David Cliffe","1.1 \tSubject to paragraph 2.1 below, the Secretary of State shall not exercise any permanent acquisition or temporary possession powers conferred by the Bill over the Property or any part of the Property for any purposes in connection with the excavation of materials from Borrow Pit 1 Area A.\r\n2.1\tParagraph 1.1 above does not preclude the Secretary of State from exercising any permanent acquisition or temporary possession powers conferred by the Bill over the Property or any part of the Property for any purposes in connection with:-\r\n2.1.1\tthe construction, operation and maintenance on, under or over the Property of any utility diversion works required for the Proposed Scheme; and/or\r\n2.1.2\tthe carrying out of the Dewatering Activities on the Property as may be required to facilitate the Nominated Undertaker’s operation of Borrow Pit 1 Area B for the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n “Borrow Pit 1 Area A”\tmeans the area of the borrow pit identified as Borrow Pit 189A that is located within the area highlighted pink on Plan 1;\r\n“Borrow Pit 1 Area B”\tmeans the area of the borrow Pit identified as Borrow Pit 189 that is located within the area highlighted yellow on Plan 2;\r\n“the Dewatering Activities”\tmeans any activities required to be carried out in connection with:\r\na)\tthe process of dewatering Borrow Pit 1 Area B;\r\nb)\tthe management of water generated from the process of dewatering Borrow Pit 1 Area B; and\r\nc)\tthe recharging into the ground of water generated from the process of dewatering Borrow Pit 1 Area B;\r\n“Petitioner”\tmeans David and Hazel Cliffe of DT Cliffe Farming, Common Farm, Bromley Hayes, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13 8JE;\r\n“Plan 1”\tmeans the plan attached to this assurance with the title Plan 1;\r\n“Plan 2”\tmeans the plan attached to this assurance with the title Plan 2;\r\n“the Property”\tmeans the land and buildings owned by the Petitioner situated within the Act limits (as defined in the Bill) located at Common Farm, Bromley Hayes, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13.\r\n","Assurance on Borrow Pit 1 Western Section (189A) – Common Farm\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Hazel and David Cliffe ","2019-04-18","Assurance","Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF;","Stafford Borough"]
["C47.4","N/A","HoC/0082, AP1/0013, AP2/0034","Hazel and David Cliffe","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Hazel and David Cliffe, assurance 1","2019-04-24","Assurance","Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF;","Stafford Borough"]
["C47.5","N/A","HoC/0082, AP1/0013, AP2/0034","Hazel and David Cliffe","2.1\tNotwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n2.2\tNotwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n2.3\tFollowing the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Hazel and David Cliffe, assurance 2","2019-04-24","Assurance","Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF;","Stafford Borough"]
["C47.6","N/A","HoC/0082, AP1/0013, AP2/0034","Hazel and David Cliffe","3.1 \tThe Promoter acknowledges that proper professional costs and fees reasonably incurred by the Petitioner for the purposes of seeking to identify suitable alternative premises at which to relocate an agricultural building which is subject to the power of compulsory acquisition under the Bill, will form a Head of Claim as part of any disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of that land under the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Professional costs and fees \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Hazel and David Cliffe, assurance 3","2019-04-24","Assurance","Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF;","Stafford Borough"]
["C47.7","N/A","HoC/0082, AP1/0013, AP2/0034","Hazel and David Cliffe","4.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will engage with the owner and occupier of the land with respect to the particular purpose(s) he expects to exercise the powers under clause 14 of the Bill, the type of vehicle(s) to be used, the purpose of the use and the expected frequency and period of use.\r\n\r\n","Use of private roads \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Hazel and David Cliffe, assurance 4","2019-04-24","Assurance","Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF;","Stafford Borough"]
["C47.8","N/A","HoC/0082, AP1/0013, AP2/0034","Hazel and David Cliffe","5.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n5.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n5.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n5.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n5.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n5.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Hazel and David Cliffe, assurance 5","2019-04-24","Assurance","Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF;","Stafford Borough"]
["C47.9","N/A","HoC/0082, AP1/0013, AP2/0034","Hazel and David Cliffe","6.1 \tPrior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of  State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n6.2 \tThe Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 6.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n6.2.1\tseek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n6.2.2 \tseek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n6.3 \tIn this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n6.4 \tNothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n\r\n","Detailed design \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Hazel and David Cliffe, assurance 6","2019-04-24","Assurance","Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF;","Stafford Borough"]
["C47.10","N/A","HoC/0082, AP1/0013, AP2/0034","Hazel and David Cliffe","7.1 \tThe Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n•\ta pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n•\ta target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n•\ta method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n•\tadvice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n•\trecommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n•\tadvice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n•\tadvice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n•\ta schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 7.2) \r\n•\tfollowing completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n•\ta final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n7.2 \tShould the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 7.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n7.3 \tThe reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n7.4 \tThe agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n\r\n","Agricultural soils \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Hazel and David Cliffe, assurance 7","2019-04-24","Assurance","Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF;","Stafford Borough"]
["C47.11","N/A","HoC/0082, AP1/0013, AP2/0034","Hazel and David Cliffe","1.1\tThe Secretary of State acknowledges that Option 7 has potential to reduce the impacts of the Proposed Scheme during construction while delivering similar benefits during operation.  The Landowners have been consulted on Option 7 and have indicated that they may be prepared to make land available by agreement to enable Option 7 to be implemented. \r\n1.2\tIn the event that the Secretary of State requires the nominated undertaker to seek to implement Option 7 the nominated undertaker will be required to continue its engagement with the Landowners in relation to the design development of the Option 7 proposals. \r\n1.3\tShould the design development and Landowner engagement suggest that Option 7 is capable of being brought forward instead of Work No.7D without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme (and for the avoidance of doubt the nominated undertaker will construct Work No.7D if it deems Option 7 cannot be delivered), the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to:\r\n1.3.1.\tdevelop an alignment substantially in accordance with the Option 7 alignment as shown indicatively on Plan 1;\r\n1.3.2.\tduring detailed design of Option 7 seek to reduce, so far as reasonably practicable, the amount of the Landowners’ land required for Option 7 on the Kings Bromley side of the Option 7 alignment and seek to reduce the footprint of the operational Option 7 permanent alignment so far as is reasonably practicable having regard to the nature and purpose of Option 7;\r\n1.3.3.\tprovide a suitable form of access to the Landowners’ land on the Kings Bromley side of the Option 7 permanent alignment; \r\n1.3.4.\tenter into an agreement with the Landowners in relation to the construction, operation and maintenance of Option 7; and\r\n1.3.5.\timplement Option 7 instead of implementing Work No.7D.\r\n1.4.\tThe agreement referred to at paragraph 1.3.4 above must include the following requirements:\r\n1.4.1.\tthe nominated undertaker will not seek to permanently acquire land that is required only for the construction of Option 7; \r\n1.4.2.\tthe Landowners must grant the nominated undertaker all necessary rights and facilities required in relation to the construction, operation and maintenance of Option 7; and\r\n1.4.3.\tthe Landowners must be freehold owners of the Property and able to convey the Property with vacant possession. \r\n1.5.\tThe assurances given in this paragraph 1 are subject to:\r\n1.5.1.\tthe nominated undertaker obtaining all the necessary consents, including any consent or agreement required under the Highways Act 1980, required to implement Option 7, with any conditions placed on the nominated undertaker able to be reasonably implementable;\r\n1.5.2.       the nominated undertaker identifying a suitable alternative site within the Act limits (as defined by the Bill), which can be used for relocation of the mitigation planting in the vicinity of the proposed new roundabout at the junction of the A515 Lichfield Road/A513 Rugeley Road;\r\n1.5.3.\tthe nominated undertaker being able to secure the necessary rights to the Property on reasonable terms pursuant to the agreement referred to at paragraph 1.3.4 above; \r\n1.5.4\tthe nominated undertaker concluding that Option 7 can be delivered without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme; and \r\n1.5.5.\tthe nominated undertaker, during detailed design, not being prevented from constructing an alternative bridleway link between Common Lane and Work No. 7B, which would otherwise connect with Work No. 7D;\r\nand nothing in these assurances requires the Secretary of State to promote an Additional Provision in relation to Option 7.”\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“Landowners” means David and Hazel Cliffe of DT Cliffe Farming, Common Farm, Bromley Hayes, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13 8JE and Joy A Fielding of J A Fielding Farms, Woodend Farm, Riley Hill, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13 8HR;\r\n“Option 7” means the proposal being considered by the nominated undertaker for an alternative solution to seek to address issues at Common Lane as a result of the Proposed Scheme involving the construction of a new permanent road linking the A515 Lichfield Road to Crawley Lane on the alignment shown indicatively on Plan 1; \r\n“the Property” means the land required for the construction, operation and maintenance of Option 7 as indicatively shown outlined in purple on Plan 1; \r\n“Plan 1” means the plan attached to this agreement;\r\n“Work No.7D” means a diversion of Common Lane commencing at a point 480 metres east of the bridge carrying the A515 Lichfield Road over Bourne Brook and terminating by a junction with Work No. 7 at a point 370 metres south-west of the junction of the A513 Rugeley Road with the A515 Lichfield Road. Work No. 7D includes a bridge over Bourne Brook as described at Schedule 1 to the Bill and proposed in Additional Provision 2; and\r\n“Work No.7B” means  an access road commencing at a point 380 metres northeast of the junction of Shaw Lane with the A515 Lichfield Road and terminating at a point 85 metres north-east of its commencement as described at Schedule 1 to the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Option 7","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Hazel and David Cliffe (and J A Fielding)","2019-04-25","Assurance","the vicinity of the proposed new roundabout at the junction of the A515 Lichfield Road/A513 Rugeley Road","Stafford Borough"]
["C47.12","N/A","HoC/0082, AP1/0013, AP2/0034","Hazel and David Cliffe","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to D T Cliffe Farming","2019-07-08","Assurance","Common Farm, Bromley Hayes, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13 8JE","Stafford Borough"]
["C48","Carter, Dr Paul and Mrs Elizabeth","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C48.1","N/A","HoC/0032","Dr Paul Carter and Mrs Elizabeth Carter","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to take appropriate steps to control and limit dust during construction in accordance with the Code of Construction Practice (CoCP).\r\n","Dust","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Paul Carter and Mrs Elizabeth Carter","2018-06-04","Assurance","Routewide","Stafford Borough"]
["C48.2","N/A","HoC/0032","Dr Paul Carter and Mrs Elizabeth Carter","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in exercise of the powers contained in the Bill, not to restrict emergency services vehicles on, across and along Pipe Lane in order to access the hamlet of Nethertown in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances during the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Access for emergency service vehicles","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Paul Carter and Mrs Elizabeth Carter","2018-11-13","Assurance","Pipe Lane, Nethertown, Hamstall Ridware, Rugeley ","Cannock Chase"]
["C48.3","N/A","HoC/0032","Dr Paul Carter and Mrs Elizabeth Carter","1.1 Subject to paragraph 1.2 below, except in the event of an emergency or unless otherwise directed by the local highway authority, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker in exercising the powers contained in the Bill for purposes in connection with the construction of the Proposed Scheme not to restrict at any time public or emergency service vehicular access to and from Nethertown on, across or along Pipe Lane.\r\n1.2 If reasonably required to ensure the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Viaduct Works or the Pipe Lane Modification Works the Nominated Undertaker may temporarily restrict vehicular access to and from Nethertown on, across or along Pipe Lane provided that:- \r\n1.2.1 A reasonable alternative vehicular access route to Nethertown via the existing public road network is open and remains open for public use for the duration of the period that such temporary restrictions remain in place; and\r\n 1.2.2 Emergency service vehicular access to and from Nethertown on, across or along Pipe Lane shall continue to be maintained by the Nominated Undertaker for the duration of the period that such temporary restrictions remain in place. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Nethertown” means Nethertown village located in the Parish of Hamstall Ridware, District of Lichfield, County of Staffordshire;\r\n“Pipe Lane” means the public highway known as Pipe Lane that is located in the Parishes of Hamstall Ridware and Mavesyn Ridware in the County of Staffordshire;\r\n“the Pipe Lane Modification Works” means the works authorised by the Bill required to be constructed so to modify the alignment of Pipe Lane in connection with the construction of Works Nos. 15 and 15A as described in Schedule 1 of the Bill;\r\n“the Viaduct Works” means the works authorised by the Bill required to be constructed in connection with the construction of a railway viaduct over Pipe Line as part of Work No.1 as described in Schedule 1 of the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Access to Nethertown","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Paul Carter and Mrs Elizabeth Carter","2019-03-27","Assurance","Pipe Lane, Nethertown, Hamstall Ridware, Rugeley ","Cannock Chase"]
["C49","Cheshire East Borough Council","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C49.1","N/A","HoC/0163, AP1/0021","Cheshire East Council","If the Crewe Hub proposals are developed by Network Rail so to include works to revise the existing railway layout at Crewe Station then, subject to such revised railway layout works being consented and funded, the Promoter will review the proposals in the Proposed Scheme for passenger train services to serve Crewe Station through the use of the Independent Lines.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Independent Lines” means the existing railway lines at Crewe Station known as the Independent Lines.\r\n","Review independent lines","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Cheshire East Council, assurance 1","2018-06-06","Assurance","Crewe Station CW2 6HR","Cheshire East"]
["C49.2","N/A","HoC/0163, AP1/0021","Cheshire East Council","Subject to the successful promotion of an Additional Provision for amendments to Crewe station, the Promoter shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the following plots in the Town of Sandbach:\r\n•Plots 2,5,6,7,8 and 9 as contained in Schedule 6 of the Bill; and\r\n•Plots 3 and 10 as contained in Schedule 8 of the Bill.\r\n","Sandbach Station Satellite Compound\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Cheshire East Council, assurance 2","2018-06-06","Assurance","Sandbach Station CW11 3JG","Cheshire East"]
["C49.3","N/A","HoC/0163, AP1/0021","Cheshire East Council","1. Except in the case of an emergency or unforeseen circumstances, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker not to use the Sandbach station satellite compound:- \r\n(i) for a duration of longer than 8 months; and\r\n(ii) during that 8 month period not to use the compound on any day between the hours of 0630 and 1900, except that such a restriction shall not apply on any day within the period of a weekend railway possession when no train services are operating at Sandbach station.","Sandbach Station Satellite Compound\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Cheshire East Council, Sandbach station carpark, assurance 1","2018-06-11","Assurance","Sandbach Station CW11 3JG","Cheshire East"]
["C49.4","N/A","HoC/0163, AP1/0021","Cheshire East Council","2. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to provide signage to inform car park users when the Sandbach station car park will be closed.","Sandbach station carpark\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Cheshire East Council, Sandbach station carpark, assurance 2","2018-06-11","Assurance","Sandbach Station CW11 3JG","Cheshire East"]
["C49.5","N/A","HoC/0163, AP1/0021","Cheshire East Council","1. Within a period of 6 months following Royal Assent, the Promoter will make available to Cheshire East Council a fund of up to £700,000 (“the Fund”) to support the identification of further local environmental and landscape enhancements within the administrative area of Cheshire East which are over and beyond that proposed in the Environmental Statement or proposed through detailed design and located outside Bill limits. The Fund will be released to Cheshire East following the Promoter’s review of Cheshire East Council’s proposals in accordance with Paragraph 3.\r\n2. The Fund includes provision for any associated costs for the administration of the Fund.\r\n3. In reviewing proposals from Cheshire East submitted in accordance with Paragraph 1 the Promoter will consider such proposals in accordance with the following conditions:\r\n· None of the proposals should impact the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n· None of the proposals should contradict any approval required for the Proposed Scheme under Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n· None of the proposals creating any new or significant effects than those identified in the ES and;\r\n· Ensuring the delivery of any proposals by Cheshire East meet the appropriate standards for managing public money,\r\nin addition to the conditions above the Promoter will continue to work with the Petitioner to agree further terms of reference for the administration of the Fund\r\n","Environment and Landscape enhancement fund\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Cheshire East Council, Environment and Landscape enhancement fund, assurances 1 to 3","2018-06-11","Assurance","Cheshire East","Cheshire East"]
["C49.6","N/A","HoC/0163, AP1/0021","Cheshire East Council ","1. Within a period of 6 months following Royal Assent, the Promoter will make available to Cheshire East Council a fund of up to £850,000 (“the Fund”) to support the identification of further local environmental and landscape enhancements within the administrative area of Cheshire East which are over and beyond that proposed in the Environmental Statement or proposed through detailed design and located outside Bill limits. The Fund will be released to Cheshire East following the Promoter’s review of Cheshire East Council’s proposals in accordance with Paragraph 3.\r\n\r\n2. The Fund includes provision for any associated costs for the administration of the Fund.\r\n\r\n3. In reviewing proposals from Cheshire East submitted in accordance with Paragraph 1 the Promoter will consider such proposals in accordance with the following conditions:\r\n• None of the proposals should impact the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n• None of the proposals should contradict any approval required for the Proposed Scheme under Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n• None of the proposals creating any new or significant effects than those identified in the ES and;\r\n• Ensuring the delivery of any proposals by Cheshire East meet the appropriate standards for managing public money, \r\n\r\nin addition to the conditions above the Promoter will continue to work with the Petitioner to agree further terms of reference for the administration of the Fund.\r\n","Environment and Landscape enhancement fund","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Cheshire East Council, Environment and Landscape enhancement fund, assurances 1 to 3","2018-08-09","Assurance","Cheshire East","Cheshire East"]
["C49.7","N/A","HoC/0163, AP1/0021","Cheshire East Council ","The Department of Transport, Network Rail and HS2 Ltd have looked carefully at capacity between Manchester and Crewe post 2027 and are satisfied that the level of capacity could be maintained with the introduction of HS2 services, subject to access rights being granted by the regulator, the Office of Rail and Road. The timetable for HS2 and conventional services beyond 2027 including between Crewe and Manchester will be subject to future planning and timetabling discussions with the West Coast Partnership, and other franchise operators and Network Rail. The Secretary of State will ask that capacity and connectivity between Crewe and Manchester are considered carefully as part of their timetabling considerations, with a view to mitigating any loss of capacity as a result of HS2.\r\n\r\n","Timetabling","Letter from the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Nusrat Ghani MP to Cllr Rachel Bailey, Leader of the Council (Cheshire East Council)","2018-06-11","Assurance","Routewide","Cheshire East"]
["C49.8","N/A","HoC/0163, AP1/0021","Cheshire East Council ","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in exercising the powers of the Bill to carry out works which the Environmental Statement reports might result in the loss of any Veteran Trees to explore and, where reasonably practicable, implement options to avoid in each case the need to remove a Veteran Tree. \r\nIn this assurance: “Veteran Trees” means those trees within the administrative boundary of Cheshire East Council and identified in: \r\n• paragraph 8.3.20 and 8.3.21 of the Community area report for CA5, South Cheshire, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement.\r\n","Veteran Trees","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Hayley Kirkham, Cheshire East Council","2019-03-11","Assurance","“Veteran Trees” means those trees within the administrative boundary of Cheshire East Council and identified in: \r\n• paragraph 8.3.20 and 8.3.21 of the Community area report for CA5, South Cheshire, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement.\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C49.9","N/A","AP2/0062","Cheshire East Council ","If the Crewe Hub proposals are developed by Network Rail to include works to revise the existing railway layout at Crewe Station (“the Revised Works”) then subject to: \r\na. the Revised Works providing the same operational railway functionality required for the Proposed Scheme as would be delivered by the timely construction of the works authorised by the Bill to revise the existing railway layout at Crewe Station; and\r\nb. the Revised Works being consented and funded;\r\nthen the Secretary of State would require the Nominated Undertaker not to exercise the powers conferred by the Bill, for the purposes of constructing a new platform on the Independent Lines.\r\n In this assurance:-\r\n “Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Additional Provisions” means amendments to the Bill introduced following deposit of the Bill into Parliament;\r\n“the Independent Lines” means the existing railway lines at Crewe Station known as the Independent Lines.","Revised Works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Emyr Thomas (Sharpe Pritchard LLP)","2019-05-13","Assurance","Cheshire East","Cheshire East"]
["C49.10","N/A","AP2/0062","Cheshire East Council ","1. The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker, when designing and implementing the proposed HS2 construction traffic haul route at the A500 Shavington Bypass (shown as indicatively in the red bubbles within the green circles on the attached plan), to comply with the requirements of Chapter 12 (Landscape and visual) and Chapter 5 of the Code of Construction Practice. \r\n","Site restoration","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Emyr Thomas (Sharpe Pritchard)","2019-05-13","Assurance","Cheshire East","Cheshire East"]
["C49.15","N/A","AP2/0062","Cheshire East Council "," 2. In accordance with paragraph 5 of Part 1 of Schedule 17 (conditions of deemed planning permission) of the Bill, the Secretary of State shall, should Cheshire East Council be a “qualifying authority”, consult with it on the content of any class approval, of arrangements relating to the ancillary matters referred to in paragraph 4(2)(a), (b) and (d) to (g), of which sub-paragraphs (2)(d) and (e) are concerned with works screening and artificial lighting. Measures approved under such class approval are subject to enforcement as if they had been approved by the planning authority under paragraph 4 of Part 1 of Schedule 17. \r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to “the Bill” include any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill.","Site restoration -class approval","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Emyr Thomas (Sharpe Pritchard)","2019-05-13","Assurance","Cheshire East","Cheshire East"]
["C49.16","N/A","AP2/0062","Cheshire East Council ","3. Prior to the statutory consultation on the draft Class Approval, the Promoter will engage with Cheshire East Council on the “works screening” in the draft in relation HS2 works at the A500 (shown as indicatively in the red bubbles within the green circles on the attached plan). This engagement will have regard to Schedule 17 to the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill, the draft Phase 2a Code of Construction, and the Draft Phase 2a Schedule 17 Statutory Guidance.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to “the Bill” include any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill.","Site restoration - engagement regarding \"works screening\"","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Emyr Thomas (Sharpe Pritchard)","2019-05-13","Assurance","Cheshire East","Cheshire East"]
["C49.17","N/A","AP2/0062","Cheshire East Council "," 4. The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker, upon completion of the HS2 construction works at the A500 Shavington Bypass, to implement a site restoration scheme in accordance with the requirements of the Bill. For the avoidance of doubt, the nominated undertaker must restore the site in accordance with a scheme agreed with the relevant planning authority or, in the absence of such agreement, as determined by the appropriate Ministers.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Appropriate Ministers” means the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and the Secretary of State for Transport acting jointly;\r\n“the HS2 construction works” means the works to construct the Proposed Scheme.","Site restoration","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Emyr Thomas (Sharpe Pritchard)","2019-05-13","Assurance","Cheshire East","Cheshire East"]
["C49.11","N/A","AP2/0062","Cheshire East Council ","1. Subject to the conditions in paragraph 2 below, the Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to seek opportunities during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to further integrate the Local Placement Sites into the existing landscape mitigation earthworks. \r\n 2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that further visual integration can be delivered:\r\n - in a manner that is consistent with the requirements for the Local Placement Sites to be restored to former land use; \r\n- within the powers and limits of the Bill;  \r\n- without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; \r\n- without the need for further consents, permissions or approvals; and\r\n- without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Local Placement Sites” means the following sites identified in Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement and Supplementary Environmental Statement 2 CA5 for the placement of surplus excavated material:\r\n - to the north and south of Chorlton Footpath 3 (SES2-005-005) Map CT-05-237, D3 to A5; and Map CT-06-237, D3 to A4, in the SES2 and AP2 ES Volume 2, CA5 Map Book;\r\n - to the east of the Casey Lane diversion (SES2-005-006) Map CT-06-239, G4 to E3, in the SES2 and AP2 ES Volume 2, CA5 Map Book.\r\n","Local Placement Sites","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Emyr Thomas (Sharpe Pritchard)","2019-05-13","Assurance","Cheshire East","Cheshire East"]
["C49.12","N/A","AP2/0062","Cheshire East Council ","For the excavated material which cannot be beneficially reused for the earthworks of the Proposed Scheme, the nominated undertaker will seek timely opportunities for such material to be used in other local construction projects or the restoration of mineral sites, provided that the transportation of that material does not result in significant environmental effects.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.","Excavated Material","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Emyr Thomas (Sharpe Pritchard)","2019-05-13","Assurance","Cheshire East","Cheshire East"]
["C49.13","N/A","AP2/0062","Cheshire East Council ","1.1.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner in order to review the Petitioner’s data on highway surveys undertaken to date and the Petitioner’s programme for any remaining highways surveys to be undertaken in advance of the Construction Period.\r\n 1.2  In the event it is necessary for the Petitioner to undertake additional highways surveys to identify any impacts on the A500 as a result of construction of works for the delivery of the Proposed Scheme in the borough of Cheshire East during the Construction Period in order to support a claim under Section 59 of the Highways Act 1980 regarding deterioration of the A500 due to Exceptional Traffic, the Secretary of State would reimburse the Petitioner’s reasonably incurred costs subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.3.\r\n1.3 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.3 are as follows:\r\n1.3.1 the survey data provided in paragraph 1.1 and 1.2 shall include data on the A500 together with comparable data on similar highways or other sections of the A500 not used by Large Goods Vehicles during the Construction Period and to the reasonable satisfaction of the Secretary of State; and\r\n1.3.2 the Petitioner provides the Secretary of State, in advance, with the anticipated reasonable costs and expenses to be incurred in relation to additional highways surveys as set out in paragraph 1.2.\r\n1.4 Should the Petitioner seek determination of Excess Expenses by a Court, such procedure shall be in accordance with Section 59 of the Highways Act 1980. However, prior to commencement of any proceedings under Section 59 of the Highways Act 1980, the Petitioner may propose that any claim for Excess Expenses be determined in accordance with paragraphs 15 to 17 of Part 1 of Schedule 32 of the Bill.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n “the A500” means the section of the A500 approved by the Petitioner, as the local highways authority, as a route for Large Goods Vehicles during the Construction Period in accordance with Schedule 17 of the Bill;\r\n“the Construction Period” means the period from commencement of any works for construction and delivery of the Proposed Scheme until completion of those works in the borough of Cheshire East;\r\n “Excess Expenses” as set out in paragraph 59(1) of the Highways Act 1980 as amended;\r\n “Extraordinary Traffic” as set out in paragraph 59(1) of the Highways Act 1980 as amended;\r\n “Large Goods Vehicles” means has the same meaning as defined in paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Cheshire East Council, Westfields, Sandbach, Cheshire, CW11 1HZ.\r\n\r\n","Surveys\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Emyr Thomas (Sharpe Pritchard), assurance 1","2019-05-13","Assurance","Cheshire East","Cheshire East"]
["C49.14","N/A","AP2/0062","Cheshire East Council ","2. Provided that the A500 Dualling Scheme receives planning permission and is successful in obtaining funding from the Department for Transport, the Promoter will engage with the Council in relation to the construction programmes and timing of the A500 Dualling Scheme and the Proposed Scheme with a view to managing any interface between the two schemes as far as reasonably practicable.\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“A500 Dualling Scheme” means the Council’s proposals to upgrade the section of the A500 between Meremoor Moss roundabout and M6 junction 16 to dual carriageway standard;\r\n“the Council” means Cheshire East Council\r\n\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.","Council’s A500 dualling scheme\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Emyr Thomas (Sharpe Pritchard), assurance 2","2019-05-13","Assurance","Cheshire East","Cheshire East"]
["C50","The Woodland Trust","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C50.1","N/A","HoC/0099","The Woodland Trust\r\n","1.1 Prior to commencement of construction, the Promoter will, or will require the Nominated Undertaker, to survey the ancient woodlands identified within Bill limits and publish the results as soon as is reasonably practicable.","Surveys of ancient woodlands prior to commencement of construction\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust), assurance 1","2018-06-05","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C50.2","N/A","HoC/0099","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","2.1 The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to have regard to the guidance in Natural England’s and the Forestry Commission’s Standing Advice (Ancient Woodland and veteran trees: protecting them from development) on avoiding damage to or loss of ancient woodland or ancient and veteran trees and for compensation for any unavoidable loss.","Having regard to Natural England's Standing Advice regarding Ancient Woodland\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust), assurance 2","2018-06-05","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C50.3","N/A","HoC/0099","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","3.1 Provided it does not increase project costs and subject to obtaining any necessary consents and permissions, the nominated undertaker will consider any reasonable and timely opportunities that arise to undertake enhancements of existing ancient woodlands outside Bill limits as an alternative to providing compensation as authorised by the Bill and consider new opportunities, where reasonably practicable, to maximise biodiversity gain.","Environmental mitigation outside of Bill land\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust),  assurance 3","2018-06-05","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C50.4","N/A","HoC/0099","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","4.1 The Promoter will ensure that a management regime is in place to ensure, as far as reasonably practicable, that the ecological objectives of ancient woodland compensation set out in the ecology site management plan are achieved within an appropriate timescale. The appropriate period of monitoring and management of new habitats is set out in HS2 Phase 2a Information Paper E2: Ecology ('Phase 2a IP E2').","Ancient woodland compensation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust),  assurance 4","2018-06-05","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C50.5","N/A","HoC/0099","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","5.1.   The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to:\r\n5.1.1. Consult with the Woodland Trust in respect of any construction activities undertaken within, or within 100m of, an area of Ancient Woodland which have been assessed as likely to have an adverse effect on the woodland, as reported in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill.\r\n5.1.2. Where any works authorised by the Bill are to be undertaken adjacent to or within 100 metres of an area of ancient woodland, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, within a reasonable time, prior to commencement of those construction activities to which this paragraph applies, to engage with the Petitioner in respect of such works and to have regard to any reasonable representations made by the Petitioner regarding any proposed mitigation (such measures to be on land within Bill limits).\r\n","Engagement on construction works\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust),  assurance 5","2018-06-05","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C50.6","N/A","HoC/0099","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","6.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to:\r\n(i) grow all trees for the Proposed Scheme in the United Kingdom;\r\n(ii) seek to use planting stock for ancient woodland compensation measures that is sourced and grown within the UK; \r\n(iii) when sourcing tree seed stock for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme, to use reasonable endeavours to source such seed stock from the United Kingdom whilst recognising that, in line with the Secretary of State's commitment to planning for future resilience to climate change, some seed stock is to have an origin and provenance from 0⁰ - 5⁰ latitude south of the planting location;\r\n(iv) put in place a system of plant passports for all seed and plant material to reduce risks to biosecurity.\r\n","Provenance of planting stock\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust),  assurance 6","2018-06-05","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C50.7","N/A","HoC/0099","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","8.1 The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to ensure that Ecology Site Management Plans, as described in High Speed Two Phase 2a Information Paper E2: Ecology, are prepared at the detailed design stage in respect of any ancient woodland compensation areas, including translocation of ancient woodland soils, and that the Nominated Undertaker (or its contractors) will engage with the Woodland Trust in their preparation and have regard to any reasonable recommendations made by the Woodland Trust. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to ensure that such Ecological Site Management Plans include, where relevant, bespoke methodologies for translocation of ancient woodland soils in accordance with the requirements for translocation of such soils described in the High Speed Two Phase 2a Ancient Woodland Strategy.\r\n","Engagement on Ecology Site Management Plans","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust), assurance 8.1","2018-07-10","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C50.8","N/A","HoC/0099","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","9.1 The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker, in exercising the powers of the Bill, to carry out works of a temporary nature which the Environmental Statement reports might result in the loss of any Veteran Trees or Ancient Woodland to explore and, where reasonably practicable, implement options to avoid in each case the need to remove a Veteran Tree or affect the Ancient Woodland. \r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n'Veteran Tree' means those trees identified within the Veteran Tree Report shared with the Woodland Trust on 15 May 2018, or any thereof before Royal Assent. \r\n\r\n'Ancient Woodland' means habitat identified as ancient woodland in the Environmental Statement and any Supplementary Environmental Statements prior to Royal Assent.\r\n","Veteran Trees and Ancient Woodland","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust), assurance 9.1","2018-07-10","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C50.9","N/A","HoC/0099","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","9.2. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in carrying out the authorised works to ensure that, of those trees identified as Veteran Trees in the Veteran Tree report shared with the Trust on 15 May 2018, no more than the nine Veteran Trees identified therein as likely to be lost, will be damaged or destroyed as a result of temporary construction works, save in unforeseen circumstances.  And further scrutiny will be given to preserving these nine trees in line with assurance 9.1 above and the draft Code of Construction Practice.\r\n","Veteran Trees ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust), assurance 9.2","2018-07-10","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C50.10","N/A","HoC/0099","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","10.1 The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to inform the Woodland Trust in advance of submitting any planning application under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for works outside the Act limits as defined in clause 60(2) of the hybrid Bill which, in the reasonable opinion of the nominated undertaker may affect ancient woodland or veteran trees.\r\n","Informing Woodland Trust of any further planning applications in relation to Phase 2a works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust), assurance 10.1","2018-07-10","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C50.11","N/A","AP2/0063","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to, when constructing the temporary overhead line diversion required at Lower Birches Plantation/Titlers Plantation to facilitate the Parkgate Grid Supply Point Connection to:\r\na)\treduce, as far as practicable, the amount of Ancient Woodland canopy that is required to be cleared as a result of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nb)\tcrown reduce/coppice no more Ancient Woodland than is reasonably necessary to safely construct and operate the overhead lines (including any statutory minimum clearance between the overhead lines and the tree canopy).\r\n","Parkgate grid supply point connection\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust), Parkgate grid assurance","2019-05-09","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C50.12","N/A","AP2/0063","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","The Promoter will not seek to gain access through the Westfield Covert Ancient Woodland for the purposes of constructing and maintaining the Additional Provision 2 Woodland and Wetland Habitat Creation and will use reasonable endeavours to avoid any damage to that woodland during the construction of those works.\r\nIn this assurance\r\n\"Westfield Covert Ancient Woodland\" means the site which is on the Ancient Woodland Inventory as at the date of this assurance and is shown indicatively edged red on the attached plan \r\n\"Woodland and Wetland Habitat Creation\" means the site which is shown indicatively edged green on the attached plan.\r\n\r\n","Westfield Covert ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust), assurance 1","2019-05-09","Assurance","Westfield Covert Ancient Woodland\" means the site which is on the Ancient Woodland Inventory as at the date of this assurance and is shown indicatively edged red on the attached plan \r\nWoodland and Wetland Habitat Creation\" means the site which is shown indicatively edged green on the attached plan.","Lichfield District"]
["C50.13","N/A","AP2/0063","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","The Promoter will ensure that Additional Provision 2 construction works do not take place within Tittensor Chase Local Wildlife Site. \r\nIn this assurance\r\n\"Tittensor Chase Local Wildlife Site\" means the site which is on the Ancient Woodland Inventory as at the date of this assurance and is shown indicatively edged red on the attached plan.\r\n\r\n","Tittensor Chase Local Wildlife Site ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust), assurance 2","2019-05-09","Assurance","Tittensor Chase Local Wildlife Site\" means the site which is on the Ancient Woodland Inventory as at the date of this assurance and is shown indicatively edged red on the attached plan.","Stafford Borough"]
["C50.14","N/A","AP2/0063","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","The Promoter will ensure that Additional Provision 2 construction works do not take place within Unnamed Woodland to the West of Holly Wood. \r\nIn this assurance\r\n\"Unnamed Woodland to the West of Holly Wood\"\tmeans the site which is on the Ancient Woodland Inventory as at the date of this assurance and is shown indicatively edged red on the attached plan. \r\n\r\n","Unnamed woodland to the West of Holly Wood ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust), assurance 3","2019-05-09","Assurance","Unnamed Woodland to the West of Holly Wood means the site which is on the Ancient Woodland Inventory as at the date of this assurance and is shown indicatively edged red on the attached plan.","Newcastle-under-Lyme"]
["C50.15","N/A","AP2/0063","The Woodland Trust\r\n\r\n","The Promoter will require that there is no additional loss of Ancient Woodland at Vicar’s Coppice and Tomhay Wood as a result of the works authorised by Additional Provision 2 above that which is reported in the Phase One ES.”\r\nIn this assurance\r\n\"Phase One ES\" means the environmental statement prepared in relation to the High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands) Act 2017\r\n\"Tomhay Wood\" means the site which is on the Ancient Woodland Inventory as at the date of this assurance and is shown indicatively edged red on the attached plan \r\n\"Vicar’s Coppice\" means the site which is on the Ancient Woodland Inventory as at the date of this assurance and is shown indicatively edged red on the attached plan. \r\n\r\n","Vicar’s Coppice and Tomhay Wood ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Luci Ryan (The Woodland Trust), assurance 4","2019-05-09","Assurance","\"Tomhay Wood\" means the site which is on the Ancient Woodland Inventory as at the date of this assurance and is shown indicatively edged red on the attached plan \r\n\"Vicar’s Coppice\" means the site which is on the Ancient Woodland Inventory as at the date of this assurance and is shown indicatively edged red on the attached plan.","Lichfield District"]
["C51","Deane , B and R","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C51.1","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to B and R Deane, assurance 1","2018-06-05","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.2","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2.  Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to B and R Deane, assurance 2 ","2018-06-05","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.3","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation","Notices of entry and taking possession.\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to B and R Deane, assurance 3 ","2018-06-05","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.4","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","4.1. The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the relocation of any agricultural buildings displaced for the purposes of the project where the replacement is either:\r\n4.1.1 to be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or\r\n4.1.2. the subject of a separate application for planning consent.\r\n4.2. The assistance referred to in paragraph 4.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for relocation of an agricultural building.\r\n4.3. Paragraph 4.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 4.1., a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 4.1. and required to give effect to the relocation of an agricultural building, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill.\r\n4.4. Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 4.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Information Paper C7, Business Relocation.\r\n4.5. In this assurance, “agricultural building” includes a residential building occupied as part of an agricultural building.\r\n4.6. In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.\r\n","Relocation of agricultural buildings\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to B and R Deane, assurance 4","2018-06-05","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.6","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","5.1. If prior to the giving of notice of entry or prior to the notice of vesting under a general vesting declaration to acquire land permanently (whether or not before Royal Assent) the Petitioner identifies suitable land for the relocation of an agricultural building (whether within or outside Petitioner’s ownership) and the Petitioner provides to the Secretary of State a detailed course of action substantiating the relocation, the Secretary of State will confirm whether or not he accepts that the land identified and evidence supporting the course of action provides a reasonable basis for the Petitioner’s claim for compensation in the event that the Bill receives Royal Assent \tand the Secretary of State exercises his powers of compulsory acquisition.\r\n","Identification of land for the relocation of agricultural buildings\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to B and R Deane, assurance 5","2018-06-05","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.5","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","6.1. The Promoter acknowledges that proper professional costs and fees reasonably incurred by the Petitioner for the purposes of seeking to identify suitable alternative premises at which to relocate an agricultural building which is subject to the power of compulsory acquisition under the Bill, will form a Head of Claim as part of any disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of that land under the Bill.\r\n","Professional costs and fees\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to B and R Deane, assurance 6","2018-06-05","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.7","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 1","2019-02-19","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.8","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","2.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2  The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 2","2019-02-19","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.9","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","\r\n1.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to modify the design of the Ecological Mitigation for the purpose of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the Works.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Ecological Mitigation” means the proposed ecological mitigation shown edged red on Plan 1; \r\n“the Petitioner” means B & R Deane of Micklow House Farm, Eccleshall Road, Stone, Staffordshire ST15 0BY;\r\n\r\n","Ecological Mitigation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 1","2019-03-20","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY specifically the proposed ecological mitigation shown edged red on Plan 1 attached to the assurance.","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.10","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","2.1 In the design and construction of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 2.2, to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the land take conferred in the Bill for the Balancing Ponds.\r\n2.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 2.1 are that:\r\n2.2.1 the nominated undertaker is satisfied that any change to the Proposed Scheme design will not create any new or different environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n2.2.2 the nominated undertaker concludes that any change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without prejudicing the safety, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n2.2.3 the proposed reduction in land take for the Balancing Ponds receives any required approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Balancing Ponds” means the balancing ponds shown coloured blue on Plan 1;\r\n“the Petitioner” means B & R Deane of Micklow House Farm, Eccleshall Road, Stone, Staffordshire ST15 0BY;\r\n“Plan 1” means the attached plan marked Plan 1 which is an illustrated version of map number CT-06-222.","Balancing Pond\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 2","2019-03-20","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY, specifically the balancing ponds shown coloured blue on Plan 1 attached to the assurance.","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.11","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","1.1. The Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with the Petitioners, where a business case is approved and where it relates to the provision of additional farm infrastructure necessary for the Petitioner’s farm business in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Promoter of land required for that business, such agreement to provide that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Promoter being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Petitioners” means Bryan Deane & Roger Deane of Micklow House Farm, Eccleshall Road, Stone, Staffordshire, ST15 0BY;\r\n“the Promoter” means the Secretary of State (or any successor Secretary of State or Minister holding the transport portfolio) and includes so far as relevant any nominated undertakers exercising any powers or functions under the Bill once enacted;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; \r\n“the SES2” means the Supplementary Environmental Statement 2, HS2’s Environmental Impact Assessment deposited in the House of Commons with amendments to the Bill on 8 February 2019.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Provision of additional farm infrastructure matters\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2019-04-29","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.12","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","2.1.\tThe Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioners in respect of the provision of additional farm infrastructure required as a result of the impact of the project on the holding where the additional infrastructure is either: \r\n2.1.1.\tto be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or \r\n2.1.2.\tthe subject of a separate application for planning consent. \r\n2.2.\tThe assistance referred to in paragraph 2.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioners) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioners in respect of the need for the provision of additional farm infrastructure. \r\n2.3.\tParagraph 2.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 2.1., the Petitioners provide to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 2.1. and required to give effect to the provision of additional farm infrastructure, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill. \r\n2.4.\tAny request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioners under paragraph 2.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper C7: Business Relocation.\r\n2.5.\tIn this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Petitioners” means Bryan Deane & Roger Deane of Micklow House Farm, Eccleshall Road, Stone, Staffordshire, ST15 0BY.\r\n","Provision of additional farm infrastructure \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-04-29","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.13","N/A","HoC/0010","B and R Deane\t","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.14","N/A","HoL/0009","B and R Deane\t","1.1.\tThe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill over the Pink Land and shall require the nominated undertaker not to exercise any of the powers conferred by the Bill over the Pink Land.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Pink Land” means the land coloured pink on the attached plan which forms part of parcel 73a in the Parish of Stone Rural as marked on the plans deposited with the Bill.\r\n","Powers over part of parcel 73a in the Parish of Stone Rural\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-10-14","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.15","N/A","HoL/0009","B and R Deane\t","1.1.\tSubject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below the Secretary of State shall acquire the Land for the purposes of the construction, operation and maintenance of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are:\r\n1.2.1.\tthe Petitioner, being the freehold owner and occupier of the Land entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the acquisition of the Land including the following terms:\r\n1.2.1.1.\tthe price to be paid for the Land and Property shall be assessed in accordance with the principles of the Compensation Code (or in the absence of agreement, by the price being 90% of the Secretary of State’s assessment of the acquisition price) as if assessed as an advanced payment under s.52 of the Land Compensation Act 1973. The acquisition price shall be in full and final settlement of all claims for compensation in respect of the open market value of the Land and Property to be acquired;\r\n1.2.1.2.\tin the absence of agreement between the parties, any dispute as to compensation to be referred to the Upper Tribunal;\r\n1.2.1.3.\tthe Land will be acquired under the principles of the Compensation Code as set out by Section 5 of the Land Compensation Act 1961 including Rule 2 and Rule 6 with the full benefit of the Compensation Code including reference to the Upper Tribunal for non-agreed elements etc;\r\n1.2.1.4.\tthe valuation date for the Land will be the earlier of the date of completion of the sale of the Land and entry by the Secretary of State under powers of entry to be conferred under the Bill;\r\n1.2.1.5.\tany claim for compensation for the acquisition of the Land will be calculated under the principles of the Compensation Code and valued the valuation date;\r\n1.2.1.6.\ton completion of the sale of the Land the Secretary of State will grant a farm business tenancy of the Land on terms acceptable to the Secretary of State and including conditions set out in the Schedule attached to these assurances. The agreement will include clauses agreed between the parties on the insurance of the Land and mechanisms in the event of any damage of the Land; \r\n1.2.1.7.\tthe Petitioner shall deliver vacant possession of the Land by the possession date, being the termination date of the tenancy;\r\n1.2.1.8.\tthe agreement will also include any other clauses required by the Secretary of State in order to facilitate the transfer of the Land; \r\n1.2.1.9.\tthe agreement will make provision for the Secretary of State, in contemplating a disposal under the terms of the 2019 Rules, to waive the exception set out in paragraph 10 of the 2019 Rules when considering the extent to which the character of the Land may have changed as a result of the construction of the authorised works on the Land;\r\n1.2.1.10.\tthe agreement will make provision that:\r\n (i)\tthe Land need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the Land; and\r\n (ii)\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n (iii)\tprovides for the maintenance of any environmental mitigation to be provided on the Land; \r\nprovided that the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an owner-occupier of adjoining land and an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;\r\n1.2.1.11.\tthe Secretary of State shall reimburse the Petitioner for reasonable legal and agents fees incurred in dealing with the acquisition of the Land and the leaseback to the extent that these are covered by the Compensation Code. Agents fees to be reimbursed at the rates currently agreed.\r\n1.2.2.\tNothing in these assurances shall prevent the Secretary of State from serving compulsory purchase notices on the Petitioners and if notice is served under the Phase 2a Bill as enacted the Secretary of State will pay compensation in line with the Compensation Code and taking account of any payments of compensation that have actually been made to the Petitioner so there shall be no double recovery of compensation.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“2019 Rules” means the Crichel Down Rules as amended in July 2019;\r\n“authorised works” means the works to be authorised under the Bill;\r\n“Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the “Bill” includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Compensation Code” means the collective term for the legal principles relating to the compensation for compulsory acquisition and deriving from Acts of Parliament and case law;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Bryan Deane and Roger Michael Robert Deane;\r\n“the Plan” means the plan annexed to these assurances;\r\n“Land” means 36.4 hectares of agricultural land at Micklow House Farm, shown for the purpose of identification only shaded on red on the Plan;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Acquisition\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-10-22","Assurance","Micklow House Farm, Eccleshell Road, Stone, ST15 0BY","Stafford Borough"]
["C51.16","N/A","HoL/0009, AP2/0060\t","B and R Deane\t","1.1. Subject to the conditions at paragraph 1.2, the Promoter will relocate the grassland habitat creation designated in SES2 and AP2 to be located in the area shown indicatively coloured yellow on the Plan to the area shown indicatively coloured blue on the Plan.\r\n1.2. The conditions at paragraph 1.1 are:\r\n1.2.1. there are no new or different environmental effects than those assessed in SES2 and AP2;\r\n1.2.2. there is no prejudice to the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.3. all required consents and approvals are obtained by the Promoter; and\r\n1.2.4. the Freehold Owners enter into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Promoter for the purpose of the management and maintenance of the grassland habitat creation on their land (the “Environmental Covenant Agreement”).\r\n1.3. Entry by the Promoter into the Environmental Covenant Agreement is conditional upon the following:\r\n1.3.1. no legal and/or other impediments to the Freehold Owners entering into and thereafter complying the Environmental Covenant Agreement which may prejudice management and maintenance of the grassland habitat creation; and\r\n1.3.2. the Promoter concluding that the Freehold Owners are appropriate persons, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for continuing management and maintenance of the grassland habitat creation.\r\n\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“Additional Provision 2” means the second additional provision to the Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 8 February 2019;\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Freeholder Owners” means the Petitioners provided that they are the freehold owners of the land coloured blue on the Plan;\r\n“the Petitioners” means Bryan Deane & Roger Deane of Micklow House Farm, Eccleshall Road, Stone, Staffordshire ST15 0BY;\r\n“the Plan” means the plans attached to this assurance;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“SES2” means the Supplementary Environmental Statement 2, HS2’s Environmental Impact Assessment deposited in the House of Commons with amendments to the Bill on 8 February 2019; and\r\n“AP2” means the Additional Provision 2, HS2’s Environmental Impact Assessment deposited in the House of Commons with amendments to the Bill on 8 February 2019.\r\n","Relocation of Great Crested Newt Habitat Creation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1 ","2019-04-02","Assurance","Areas shown in blue and yellow on the plans attached to letter to beneficiary","Stafford Borough"]
["C52","Hooley, H R and F J ","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C52.1","N/A","HoC/0165","H R and F J Hooley","1.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n1.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R and F J Hooley. assurance 1","2018-06-05","Assurance","Bishton Lane Farm\r\nStafford, ST18 0XE","Stafford Borough"]
["C52.2","N/A","HoC/0165","H R and F J Hooley","2.1.Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n2.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 2.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n2.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n2.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n2.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n2.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R and F J Hooley, assurance 2","2018-06-05","Assurance","Bishton Lane Farm\r\nStafford, ST18 0XE","Stafford Borough"]
["C52.3","N/A","HoC/0165","H R and F J Hooley","1.1.  Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n1.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n"," Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R and F J Hooley, assurance 1","2018-06-18","Assurance","Bishton Lane Farm\r\nStafford, ST18 0XE","Stafford Borough"]
["C52.4","N/A","HoC/0165","H R and F J Hooley","2.1  Provided that–\r\n2.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n2.1.1.1  provides that the Property need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n2.1.1.2  restricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n2.1.1.3  provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n2.1.2   the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;]\r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n"," Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R and F J Hooley, assurance 2","2018-06-18","Assurance","Bishton Lane Farm\r\nStafford, ST18 0XE","Stafford Borough"]
["C52.5","N/A","HoC/0165","H R and F J Hooley","3.1  Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 1.1 and 2.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 1.1 and 2.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n3.2  On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 3.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n3.3  In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 3.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R and F J Hooley, assurance 3","2018-06-18","Assurance","Bishton Lane Farm\r\nStafford, ST18 0XE","Stafford Borough"]
["C52.6","N/A","HoC/0165","H R and F J Hooley","4.1  The Secretary of State [or any statutory undertaker authorised by the Secretary of State] may exercise the powers of the Bill so as to acquire permanent rights over the Property in respect of [installing, maintaining, renewing, replacing or upgrading cable, pipes, ducts and other services and to have access to the Property in order to maintain, renew, replace or upgrade such cable, pipes, ducts or other services] or [access over the Property as required in connection with the construction, implementation, renewal, operation or maintenance of the work authorised by the Bill].\r\n4.2  Subject to paragraph 19.1 the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is required for the acquisition of rights\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R and F J Hooley, assurance 4","2018-06-18","Assurance","Bishton Lane Farm\r\nStafford, ST18 0XE","Stafford Borough"]
["C52.7","N/A","HoC/0165","H R and F J Hooley","7.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n7.2  The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n7.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n7.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n7.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n7.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R and F J Hooley, assurance 5","2018-06-18","Assurance","Bishton Lane Farm\r\nStafford, ST18 0XE","Stafford Borough"]
["C52.8","N/A","HoC/0165","H R and F J Hooley","1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, during detailed design, regarding the widening of Bishton Lane under the Proposed Scheme, to use reasonable endeavours, during construction of the proposed scheme to avoid:\r\n1.1 any interruption to private water extraction serving the Petitioners’ property; and\r\n1.2 any decline in quality of water obtained by private unlicensed water extraction serving the Petitioners’' property.\r\n 2. The assurance in paragraph 1 is subject to the nominated undertaker concluding that its implementation would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Drainage\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Hayhurst, assurance 1","2018-12-17","Assurance","Bishton Lane Farm\r\nStafford, ST18 0XE","Stafford Borough"]
["C52.9","N/A","HoC/0165","H R and F J Hooley","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale (Bagshaws LLP), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Bishton Lane Farm\r\nStafford, ST18 0XE","Stafford Borough"]
["C53","Plant, Richard and Hana, Mr and Mrs E Anderson, Mrs S Marginson","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C53.1","N/A","HoC/0014","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant, Mr and Mrs E Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson, assurance 1","2018-06-05","Assurance","Walton House Farm, Common Lane, Stone, ST15 0BX\r\n\r\nThe Cottage,Common Lane,\r\nStone, ST15 0BX\r\n\r\nPool House Farm, Weston-Jones, Newport, TF10 8ED","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.2","N/A","HoC/0014","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","2.1.  The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant, Mr and Mrs E Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson, assurance 2","2018-06-05","Assurance","Walton House Farm, Common Lane, Stone, ST15 0BX\r\nThe Cottage,Common Lane,\r\nStone, ST15 0BX\r\nPool House Farm, Weston-Jones, Newport, TF10 8ED","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.3","N/A","HoC/0014","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant, Mr and Mrs E Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson, assurance 3","2018-06-05","Assurance","Walton House Farm, Common Lane, Stone, ST15 0BX\r\nThe Cottage,Common Lane,\r\nStone, ST15 0BX\r\nPool House Farm, Weston-Jones, Newport, TF10 8ED","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.4","N/A","HoC/0014","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","4.1. The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the relocation of any agricultural buildings displaced for the purposes of the project where the replacement is either:\r\n4.1.1 to be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or\r\n4.1.2. the subject of a separate application for planning consent.\r\n4.2. The assistance referred to in paragraph 4.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for relocation of an agricultural building.\r\n4.3. Paragraph 4.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 4.1., a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 4.1. and required to give effect to the relocation of an agricultural building, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill.\r\n4.4. Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 4.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Information Paper C7, Business Relocation.\r\n4.5.In this assurance, “agricultural building” includes a residential building occupied as part of an agricultural building.\r\n4.6. In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.","Relocation of agricultural buildings\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant, Mr and Mrs E Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson, assurance 4","2018-06-05","Assurance","Walton House Farm, Common Lane, Stone, ST15 0BX\r\nThe Cottage,Common Lane,\r\nStone, ST15 0BX\r\nPool House Farm, Weston-Jones, Newport, TF10 8ED","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.5","N/A","HoC/0014","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","5.1. If prior to the giving of notice of entry or prior to the notice of vesting under a general vesting declaration to acquire land permanently (whether or not before Royal Assent) the Petitioner identifies suitable land for the relocation of an agricultural building (whether within or outside Petitioner’s ownership) and the Petitioner provides to the Secretary of State a detailed course of action substantiating the relocation, the Secretary of State will confirm whether or not he accepts that the land identified and evidence supporting the course of action provides a reasonable basis for the Petitioner’s claim for compensation in the event that the Bill receives Royal Assent \tand the Secretary of State exercises his powers of compulsory acquisition.\r\n","Identification of land for the relocation of agricultural buildings","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant, Mr and Mrs E Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson, assurance 5","2018-06-05","Assurance","Walton House Farm, Common Lane, Stone, ST15 0BX\r\nThe Cottage,Common Lane,\r\nStone, ST15 0BX\r\nPool House Farm, Weston-Jones, Newport, TF10 8ED","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.6","N/A","HoC/0014","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","6.1. The Promoter acknowledges that proper professional costs and fees reasonably incurred by the Petitioner for the purposes of seeking to identify suitable alternative premises at which to relocate an agricultural building which is subject to the power of compulsory acquisition under the Bill, will form a Head of Claim as part of any disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of that land under the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Building A” means the building shown coloured red on the accompanying plan [attached to beneficiary letter]; and\r\n“the Works” means Work No. 62 as shown in part on Replacement Sheet 1-36 of the plans deposited with the Bill.\r\n","Professional costs and fees\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant, Mr and Mrs E Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson, assurance 6","2018-06-05","Assurance","Walton House Farm, Common Lane, Stone, ST15 0BX\r\nThe Cottage,Common Lane,\r\nStone, ST15 0BX\r\nPool House Farm, Weston-Jones, Newport, TF10 8ED","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.7","N/A","HoC/0014","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","1.1. Subject to the Bill being enacted in its current form, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in the exercise of Bill powers to use reasonable endeavours not to demolish Building A for the purposes of constructing the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.2.The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to the nominated undertaker concluding that constructing the Works without demolishing Building A would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Impact on Building A\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), assurance 1","2018-06-19","Assurance","Walton House Farm, Common Lane, Stone, ST15 0BX\r\nThe Cottage,Common Lane,\r\nStone, ST15 0BX\r\nPool House Farm, Weston-Jones, Newport, TF10 8ED","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.8","N/A","HoC/0014","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","\r\n1.1 Subject to the Bill being enacted in its current form, in undertaking the Proposed Scheme the Promoter will install hedgerow on the Blue Land in lieu of tree planting on that land provided that doing so would not give rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been assessed in the Environmental Statement for the Proposed Scheme but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications. \r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Blue Land” means the land shaded blue on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n\r\n“Plan 1” means the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] bearing document number ‘2PT01-ARP-EV-DPL-000-056221 Rev P04’.\r\n","Tree Planting ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), assurance 1.1","2018-07-06","Assurance","The land shaded blue on Plan 1 attached to the letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.9","N/A","HoC/0014","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","1.3 Subject to the successful promotion of Additional Provision 2 and the receipt of all necessary approvals and consents the Promoter will, in undertaking the Proposed Scheme, carry out the works to complete the Footpath Diversion.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Footpath 32” means the public footpath shown for identification purposes only with a broken orange line and labelled ‘FP 32’;\r\n\r\n“Footpath Diversion” means the diversion of Footpath 32 as shown on Plan 1 as a solid orange line and labelled ‘FP 32’ including the element of further diversion indicated by the pink solid line on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“Plan 1” means the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] bearing document number ‘2PT01-ARP-EV-DPL-000-056221 Rev P04’\r\n","Footpath Diversion","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), assurance 1.3","2018-07-06","Assurance","The element of further diversion indicated by the pink solid line on Plan 1;\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.10","N/A","HoC/0014","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), assurance 1","2019-03-05","Assurance","Walton House Farm, Common Lane, Stone, ST15 0BX\r\nThe Cottage,Common Lane,\r\nStone, ST15 0BX\r\nPool House Farm, Weston-Jones, Newport, TF10 8ED","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.11","N/A","HoC/0014","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), assurance 2","2019-03-05","Assurance","Walton House Farm, Common Lane, Stone, ST15 0BX\r\nThe Cottage,Common Lane,\r\nStone, ST15 0BX\r\nPool House Farm, Weston-Jones, Newport, TF10 8ED\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.12","N/A","AP2/0067","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","1. If Additional Provision 2 is confirmed by Parliament and the Yellow Land remains in the ownership of the Yellow Land Owners, the nominated undertaker shall provide no more than a Limited Accommodation Access across the Owners’ Land. \r\n2. In the event that the accommodation access is not required, provided that the conditions in paragraph 3 are fulfilled the Secretary of State shall not exercise compulsory purchase powers over plot AP2-45 and AP2-44 and may instead exercise temporary powers over plot AP2-44 under Schedule 15 of the Bill for the purpose of access, construction and maintenance of the Grassland Habitat Area. \r\n3. The conditions referred to in paragraph 2 are that:\r\n(i) the Promoter successfully promotes Additional Provision 2; \r\n(ii) the Owners enter into a management and maintenance agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the management and maintenance of the Grassland Habitat Area;\r\n(iii) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Owners are an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the Grassland Habitat Area to enter into an agreement referred to in paragraph (ii);\r\n(iv) the Secretary of State being satisfied that there is no legal impediment to the Owners entering into and complying with an agreement under paragraph (ii) which may prejudice the maintenance of the Grassland Habitat Area.\r\n“In this assurance:\r\n\"Accommodation access” means an access to be provided on the Owners’ Land on Plots AP2-44 and AP2-45 as shown on the Plan;\r\n“Grassland Habitat Area” means an area of grassland habitat to be constructed on the Owners’ Land and shown on the Plan;\r\n“Limited Accommodation Access” means an access for the benefit of the owners of the Yellow Land and the nominated undertaker over Work No. 66, plots AP2-44 and AP2-45 as shown on Sheet No 1 – 36 of the plans deposited in Parliament with Additional Provision 2;\r\n“Owners” means Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant, Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson;\r\n“Owners’ Land” means Walton House Farm shown edged red on the Plan;   \r\n“the Plan” means the plan attached to this assurance;\r\n“Plots AP2-44 and AP2-45” means the plots shown on Sheet No. 1 - 36 of the plans deposited in Parliament with Additional Provision 2;\r\n“Work No. 66” means an access road including a bridge over the railway as further described in Schedule 1 to the Bill; \r\n“Yellow Land” means land shown shaded yellow on the Plan;\r\n“Yellow Land Owners” means the owners of the Yellow Land at the date of this assurance;\r\n\r\n\r\n","Accommodation access rights","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), assurance 1 and 2","2019-04-01","Assurance","“Plots AP2-44 and AP2-45” means the plots shown on Sheet No. 1 - 36 of the plans deposited in Parliament with Additional Provision 2;Walton House Farm, Common Lane, Stone, ST15 0BX\r\nThe Cottage,Common Lane,\r\nStone, ST15 0BX\r\nPool House Farm, Weston-Jones, Newport, TF10 8ED\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.13","N/A","AP2/0067","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","1.\tThe Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme with the aim of addressing the Petitioners’ safety and security concerns in relation to the proposed realignment of Stone Rural Footpath 32 Diversion so far as reasonably practicable. \r\n2.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 3 below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consider implementing any reasonable proposals which meet the aims of the engagement under paragraph 1 above so far as reasonably practicable. \r\n 3.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 2 above are:\r\n a.\tthe Petitioner providing any necessary access or rights required for the proposals to be implemented on terms satisfactory to the Nominated Undertaker;\r\nb.\tthe Nominated Undertaker securing any necessary consents, approvals and permissions for the proposals 9 months before commencement of works for Stone Rural Footpath 32 Diversion provided that such consents can be reasonably implemented, and any approvals required under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 of the Bill;\r\nc.\tthe proposals can be accommodated within the limits and powers of the Bill;\r\nd.\tthe proposals can be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those reported in the Phase 2a Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement and Supplementary Environmental Statement 2;\r\ne.\tthe proposals can be delivered within the works programme for the Proposed Scheme;\r\nf.\tthe proposals can be delivered without prejudicing the timely, economic and safe delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\ng.\tthe proposals would not adversely affect the integrity of the mitigation creation required to be provided on the Petitioner's Land under the Bill.”\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n “the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (Crewe – West Midlands) Bill as amended by Additional Provision 1 and Additional Provision 2;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant, Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson of Walton House Farm; \r\n “the Petitioner’s Land” means the land shown edged red on the Plan; \r\n“the Plan” means the plan attached to this assurance;\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of High Speed 2 as further defined in the Bill;\r\n “Stone Rural Footpath 32 Diversion” means the realignment of the Stone Rural Footpath diversion as shown on the Plan.\r\n\r\n","Stone Rural Footpath 32 Diversion”","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurances 1 to 3","2019-04-23","Assurance","Stone Rural Footpath 32 Diversion","Stafford Borough"]
["C53.14","N/A","AP2/0067","Mr Richard and Mrs Hana Plant and Mr and Mrs Anderson and Mrs Susan Marginson","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-08","Assurance","Walton House Farm, Common Lane, Stone, ST15 0BX\r\nThe Cottage,Common Lane,\r\nStone, ST15 0BX\r\nPool House Farm, Weston-Jones, Newport, TF10 8ED","Stafford Borough"]
["C54","Baskeyfield, Elizabeth, Neville, Timothy","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C54.1","N/A","HoC/0043","Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield","1.1. The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n1.2. The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by  the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n1.4 Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n1.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield, assurance 1","2018-06-08","Assurance","Madeley Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, Newcastle, ST5 5ET","Stafford Borough"]
["C54.2","N/A","HoC/0043","Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield","2.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n2.2.  The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 2.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n2.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n2.2.2  seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n2.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n2.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield, assurance 2","2018-06-08","Assurance","Madeley Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, Newcastle, ST5 5ET","Stafford Borough"]
["C54.3","N/A","HoC/0043","Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield, assurance 3","2018-06-08","Assurance","Madeley Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, Newcastle, ST5 5ET","Stafford Borough"]
["C54.4","N/A","HoC/0043","Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield","4. 1 The Promoter acknowledges that proper professional costs and fees reasonably incurred by the Petitioner for the purposes of seeking to identify suitable alternative premises at which to relocate an agricultural building which is subject to the power of compulsory acquisition under the Bill, will form a Head of Claim as part of any disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of that land under the Bill.","Professional costs and fees","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield, assurance 4","2018-06-08","Assurance","Madeley Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, Newcastle, ST5 5ET","Stafford Borough"]
["C54.5","N/A","HoC/0043","Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield","5.1. The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.","Provision of information","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield, assurance 5","2018-06-08","Assurance","Madeley Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, Newcastle, ST5 5ET","Stafford Borough"]
["C54.6","N/A","HoC/0043","Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield","The Promoter will continue to engage with the Baskeyfields up to and throughout detailed design so that they can provide their views on the proposals. The Promoter will adopt the proposal in their petition for reinstating the drainage pipe, subject only to the exact positioning of the viaduct, which will be confirmed during detailed design.\r\n","Drainage solution","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's Second Special Report of Session 2017 - 2019, paragraph 49","2018-11-13","Assurance","Madeley Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, Newcastle, ST5 5ET","Stafford Borough"]
["C54.7","N/A","HoC/0043","Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Neville Baskeyfield","2019-07-09","Assurance","Madeley Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, Newcastle, ST5 5ET","Stafford Borough"]
["C54.8","N/A","HoL/0015","Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield","1.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to relocate the proposed wetland habitat creation from the Blue Land to the Yellow Land, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below.\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n1.2.1 the proposed relocation does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement;\r\n1.2.2 the proposed relocation does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.3 the Yellow Land being sufficient to accommodate the wetland habitat creation intended for the Blue Land;\r\n1.2.4 the Nominated Undertaker obtains any required approval for the proposed relocation\r\nfrom the local planning authority, and that such consents can be reasonably implemented;\r\n1.2.5 the Petitioner, being the freehold owner and occupier of the Yellow Land and either:\r\n1.2.5.1 entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n1.2.5.1.1 grants all and any necessary rights over the Yellow Land sufficient to enable the Secretary of State to use that land for the wetland habitat creation including, for the avoidance of doubt, any access required for the establishment, maintenance and inspection of the wetland habitat creation;\r\n1.2.5.1.2 provides for the construction of the wetland habitat creation on the Yellow Land and its maintenance by the Petitioner, subject to a management and maintenance agreement being entered into between the Petitioner and the Secretary of State; and\r\n 1.2.5.1.3 provides that the consideration payable to the Petitioner for using the Yellow Land for wetland habitat creation will be calculated as if the Secretary of State had done so in the exercise of the powers of the Bill; or\r\n1.2.5.2 the Petitioner transfers in fee simple to the Secretary of State the Yellow Land for its open market value or a value equal to the value of the Blue Land (whichever is less) together with any right of access required for the establishment maintenance and inspection of the wetland habitat creation;\r\n1.2.6 the Yellow Land not being subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the construction, maintenance or the objectives of the wetland habitat creation to be provided; and\r\n1.2.7 if the agreement referred to at paragraph 1.2.5.1 is to be entered into:\r\n1.2.7.1 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the wetland habitat creation, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of wetland habitat creation on the Yellow Land; and\r\n1.2.7.2 the Secretary of State being satisfied that there is no legal impediment to the Petitioner entering into and thereafter complying with the agreement which may prejudice the maintenance of the wetland habitat creation on the Yellow Land.\r\n1.3 Nothing in this assurance prevents the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred by the Bill over the Blue Land to provide the proposed wetland habitat creation to the extent that the Yellow Land is insufficient to accommodate the proposed wetland habitat creation.\r\n1.4 If the Nominated Undertaker constructs the wetland habitat creation on the Blue Land the Secretary of State will grant the Petitioner a reasonable right of access for the purposes of the management and maintenance of drainage ditches serving other property of the Petitioner in the vicinity of the River Lea provided that the grant of such rights does not affect the integrity and objectives of the wetland habitat creation to be created on that land.\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n“Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017;\r\n“the Blue Land” means the land indicatively shown coloured blue on the Plan;\r\n“the Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Elizabeth Margaret Baskeyfield, Neville Baskeyfield and Timothy Neil Baskeyfield of Mitchells Wood Farm, Bells Hollow, Red Street Village, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire ST5 7AJ;\r\n“the Plan” means the plan attached to this assurance;\r\n“Property” means Madeley Park Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, ST5 5 ET;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“the Yellow Land” means the land indicatively shown coloured yellow on the Plan.\r\n","Relocation of wetland habitat creation \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Neville Baskeyfield, assurance 1","2019-10-18","Assurance","Madeley Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, Newcastle, ST5 5ET","Stafford Borough"]
["C54.9","N/A","HoL/0015","Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to exercise its powers of temporary possession under Schedule 15 to the Bill instead of the Secretary of State exercising its powers of permanent acquisition over the Green Land, provided that:\r\n2.1.1 the Petitioner, being the freehold owner and occupier of the Green Land, enters into a management and maintenance agreement in relation to the management and maintenance of the grassland habitat creation to be provided on the Green Land in a form that is satisfactory to the Secretary of State; and\r\n2.1.2 the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided,\r\n to be responsible for securing the maintenance of the grassland habitat creation on the Green Land.\r\n2.2 If the Secretary of State exercises its powers under the Bill to permanently acquire the Green Land it will grant a reasonable right of access for the purposes of the management and maintenance of drainage ditches serving other property of the Petitioner in the vicinity of the River Lea provided that the grant of such rights does not affect the integrity and objectives of the grassland habitat creation to be created on that land.\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n“Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017;\r\n“the Green Land” means the land indicatively shown coloured green on the Plan;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Elizabeth Margaret Baskeyfield, Neville Baskeyfield and Timothy Neil Baskeyfield of Mitchells Wood Farm, Bells Hollow, Red Street Village, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire ST5 7AJ.\r\n","Grassland habitat creation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Neville Baskeyfield, assurance 2","2019-10-18","Assurance","Madeley Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, Newcastle, ST5 5ET","Stafford Borough"]
["C54.10","N/A","HoL/0015","Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield","3.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to engage with the Petitioner during the construction of the Proposed Scheme regarding the management of the River Lea in the vicinity of the Petitioners’ Property.\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n\"Property\" means Madeley Park Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, ST5 5ET","Engagement during construction \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Neville Baskeyfield, assurance 3","2019-10-18","Assurance","Madeley Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, Newcastle, ST5 5ET","Stafford Borough"]
["C54.11","N/A","HoL/0015","Elizabeth, Neville and Timothy Baskeyfield","4.1\tIf the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n4.1.1\tprovides that the relocated wetland habitat mitigation land, the Yellow Land, and\r\ngrassland habitat mitigation land, the Green Land, must retain its ecological value in accordance with a monitoring and maintenance regime provided by the Secretary of State; and\r\n4.1.2\tprovides for the maintenance of the wetland and grassland habitat mitigation to be provided on the wetland and grassland habitat mitigation land; and\r\n4.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the wetland and grassland habitat mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation on the wetland and grassland habitat mitigation land; and\r\n4.3 there are no legal and/or other impediments to the Petitioners or owners entering into and thereafter complying with an agreement referred to in paragraphs 4.1.1 above which may prejudice the construction and/or maintenance of the wetland or grassland habitat mitigation,\r\nthe Secretary of State shall enter into appropriate arrangements to allow the Petitioner to graze the wetland and the grassland habitat mitigation land in accordance with the terms of the above agreement.\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n“the Green Land” means the land indicatively shown coloured green on the Plan;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Elizabeth Margaret Baskeyfield, Neville Baskeyfield and Timothy Neil Baskeyfield of Mitchells Wood Farm, Bells Hollow, Red Street Village, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire ST5 7AJ; and\r\n“the Yellow Land” means the land indicatively shown coloured yellow on the Plan.\r\n","Monitoring and maintenance\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Neville Baskeyfield, assurance 4","2019-10-18","Assurance","Madeley Farm, Manor Road, Baldwins Gate, Newcastle, ST5 5ET","Stafford Borough"]
["C55","Baskerville, June and Barbara","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C55.1","N/A","HoC/0094","June and Barbara Baskerville","1.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n1.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n1.4 Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n1.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to June and Barbara Baskerville, assurance 1","2018-06-08","Assurance","Common Lane Farm, know as Gordon Baskerville and Company, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF","East Staffordshire"]
["C55.2","N/A","HoC/0094 and AP2/0082","June and Barbara Baskerville","1.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner regarding the proposed relocation of the Utility Compound and land required for the Overhead Line Works to an alternative location at the Petitioner’s Property, subject to the following conditions:\r\n1.1.1 the nominated undertaker secures any necessary planning permission, consents and approvals for the use of an alternative location for the Utility Compound and Overhead Line Works for such purpose before the date nine months from the date of Royal Assent to the Bill (the nominated undertaker having used reasonable endeavours to secure such planning permission, consents and approvals as necessary within this timescale);\r\n1.1.2 the nominated undertaker being satisfied that any alternative location is sufficient to accommodate the Utility Compound and Overhead Line Works;\r\n1.1.3 any change to the Proposed Scheme design will not create any new or different environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n1.1.4 any change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without prejudicing the safety, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.1.5 the proposed relocation of the Utility Compound and Overhead Line Works receives any required approvals from the local planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n1.1.6 the Petitioner as owner of the Property enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the nominated undertaker which:\r\n1.1.6.1 grants any and all necessary rights over the alternative location for the Utility Compound and Overhead Line Works sufficient to enable the nominated undertaker to use that land for the Utility Compound and Overhead Line Works; and\r\n1.1.6.2 provides that the consideration payable to the Petitioner for using the alternative location for the Utility Compound and Overhead Line Works shall be calculated as if the Secretary of State had done so in exercise of powers in the Bill.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“Overhead Line Works’” means works pursuant to the National Electricity Transmission System electrical circuits within the Petitioner’s land holding;\r\n“the Petitioner” means June and Barbara Baskerville of Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF;\r\n“the Property” means Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 7JF;\r\n“the Utility Compound” means the land identified for the provision of a utility compound as shown orange on plan CT-05-202 and marked ‘Litchfield Road Utility Compound’.\r\n\r\n","Relocation of the Utility Compound and Overhead Line Works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to June and Barbara Baskerville, assurance 1","2019-04-09","Assurance","Litchfield Road Utility Compound’.\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C55.3","N/A","HoC/0094 and AP2/0082","June and Barbara Baskerville","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill that are proposed to be constructed on or operated from any part of the Property for the purposes of the operation of the Borrow Pit, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the Nominated Undertaker’s preparation of the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation under paragraph 1.1 above and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors including but not limited to the relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.4 below associated with the design, construction, operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding operated by the Petitioner on or from the Property during the period of the excavation of the Borrow Pit by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.3 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the environmental statement for the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.4 The relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.2 above are:-\r\n1.4.1 any requirements of the local planning authority for the approval of the operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit under Schedule 17 of the Bill;\r\n1.4.2 the safe, timely and economic operation of the Borrow Pit;\r\n1.4.3 compliance with other relevant undertakings and assurances; and \r\n1.4.4 the safe, timely and economic delivery of any other works for the Proposed Scheme connected with, or within the vicinity of, the Borrow Pit.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n “Bill”\tmeans the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Borrow Pit”\tmeans the borrow pit identified on Plan 1 and Plan 2 as Borrow Pit 1 (189) and located within plot 54 in the Parish of Kings Bromley and plot 13 in the Parish of Alrewas;\r\n“Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology”\tmeans the methodology for the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which shall include the following:-\r\na)\tInformation on the method or methods for the extraction of materials from any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property;\r\nb)\tInformation on any other works and/or activities required in connection with the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which are to be constructed and/or undertaken on or from the Property, and\r\nc)\tInformation on any sequencing of material extraction operations for any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property;\r\n“Petitioner”\tmeans June, Barbara, Gordon Baskerville and Company of Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire DE13 7JF;\r\n“Plan 1”\tmeans the plan attached to this assurance highlighted in yellow with the title Plan 1;\r\n“Plan 2”\tmeans the plan attached to this assurance highlighted in yellow with the title Plan 2;\r\n“the Property”\tmeans the land and buildings owned by the Petitioner situated within the Act limits (as defined in the Bill) located at Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire DE13 7JF;\r\n“Proposed Scheme”\tmeans Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Assurance on Borrow Pit 1 189 (Eastern Section) – Common Lane Farm\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to June and Barbara Baskerville, assurance 1","2019-04-18","Assurance","Common Lane Farm, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire DE13 7JF;\r\n\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C56","Field, William","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C56.1","N/A","HoC/0124","William Field","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2.  The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to William Field, assurance 1","2018-06-08","Assurance","\"The Lion Lodge Estate\" comprising of:-\r\nLion Lodge and Flushing Coverts and agricultural land (Town Field);\r\nNos 1 and 2 Lion Lodge either side of the gateway, to the Shrewsbury Estate and prominent features on the approach to the historic village of Ingestre;\r\nKeeper's Cottage, No 1 Hoo Mill Lane; \r\nAlso, sporting rights on the Lion Lodge Estate and adjacent land totalling some 200 hectares.","East Staffordshire"]
["C56.2","N/A","HoC/0124","William Field","2.1. The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.","Provision of information","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to William Field, assurance 2","2018-06-08","Assurance","\"The Lion Lodge Estate\" comprising of:-\r\nLion Lodge and Flushing Coverts and agricultural land (Town Field);\r\nNos 1 and 2 Lion Lodge either side of the gateway, to the Shrewsbury Estate and prominent features on the approach to the historic village of Ingestre;\r\nKeeper's Cottage, No 1 Hoo Mill Lane; \r\nAlso, sporting rights on the Lion Lodge Estate and adjacent land totalling some 200 hectares.\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C57","Leavesley, James","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C57.1","N/A","HoC/0135","James Leavesley","1.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n1.1. The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n1.3. Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n1.4. As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.5. Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to James Leavesley, assurance 1","2018-06-08","Assurance","Needwood House Farm, Tutbury Road, Needwood, Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 9PQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C57.2","N/A","HoC/0135","James Leavesley","2.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n2.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 2.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n2.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n2.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n2.3.  In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n2.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to James Leavesley, assurance 2 ","2018-06-08","Assurance","Needwood House Farm, Tutbury Road, Needwood, Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 9PQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C57.3","N/A","HoC/0135","James Leavesley","\r\n 1. The Secretary of State will not exercise the compulsory acquisition powers under the Bill over the Lagoon Land and will require the nominated undertaker not to exercise the powers of the Bill to take temporary possession of that land.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Lagoon Land” means such part of plot 16 in the Parish of Alrewas as is shown shaded yellow on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n“Trent and Mersey Canal Viaduct Phase One” is the proposed viaduct labelled as the Trent and Mersey Canal Viaduct Phase One on Map Number CT-06-200; and\r\n“Pyford Brook Viaduct” is the proposed viaduct labelled as the Pyford Brook Viaduct on Map Number CT-06-201.\r\n","Land Take\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to James Leavesley, assurance 1","2018-06-21","Assurance","Needwood House Farm, Tutbury Road, Needwood, Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 9PQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C57.4","N/A","HoC/0135","James Leavesley","2.1   The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to provide a vehicular right of access for the benefit of the Petitioner either under the Trent and Mersey Canal Viaduct Phase One or under the Pyford Brook Viaduct between the Petitioner’s land to the east of the proposed HS2 Phase 2a line of route and the Petitioner’s land to the west of that route during the operation of the Proposed Scheme. \r\n2.2   The vehicular right of access provided under paragraph 2.1 is subject to the nominated undertaker notifying the Petitioner of the maximum height of the vehicles that may use that right of access.”\r\n","Access\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to James Leavesley, assurance 2 ","2018-06-21","Assurance","Needwood House Farm, Tutbury Road, Needwood, Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 9PQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C58","Sutton, David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C58.1","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, \tassociated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 1","2018-06-11","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.2","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 2","2018-06-11","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.3","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","3.1. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 3","2018-06-11","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.4","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","1.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property Gonsley Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Gonsley Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n1.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 1","2018-06-18","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.5","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","2.1  Provided that–\r\n2.1.1 \tthe Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n2.1.1.1 \tprovides that the Property Gonsley Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n2.1.1.2\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n2.1.1.3\tprovides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n2.1.2  the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n2.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 2","2018-06-18","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.6","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","3.1  Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n3.2  On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n3.3  In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n3.4  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 3","2018-06-18","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.7","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","4.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Gonsley Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 4","2018-06-18","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.8","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","5.1  If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Gonsley Farm the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 5","2018-06-18","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.9","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","6.1  The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n6.2  The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n6.3  The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n6.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n6.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n6.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Blue Land” means Area 3 circled blue on the Petitioner’s exhibit A215(13);\r\n“the Green Land” means the land coloured green on the enclosed plan [attached to beneficiary letter] bearing the reference CT-06-237;\r\n“the Red Land” means the land edged red on the enclosed plan [attached to beneficiary letter] bearing the reference CT-06-237;\r\n “Plot 3” means plot 3 as illustrated on the Petitioner’s exchanged exhibit No. A215 (13); \r\n“Plot 4” means plot 4 as illustrated on the Petitioner’s exchanged exhibit No. A215 (13);\r\n“the Yellow Land”  means the land coloured yellow on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] numbered CT-06-239 as deposited with the Bill. The land has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of landscape mitigation.","Drainage \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 6","2018-06-18","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.10","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","1.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker where reasonably practicable to modify the design of the proposed ecological mitigation in the Blue Land for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the Works.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\"the Blue Land” means Area 3 circled blue on the Petitioner’s exhibit A215(13)\r\n","Ecological Mitigation\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 1 in response to request 1","2018-06-25","Assurance","\"The Blue Land” as shown attached to the letter\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C58.11","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the gradient on the embankment illustrated as Plot 4 in order that the Petitioner’s land holding is more readily available for agricultural use, subject to the Petitioner’s agreement. \r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Plot 4” means plot 4 as illustrated on the Petitioner’s exchanged exhibit No. A215 (13)\r\n","Gradient \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 2 in response to request 2","2018-06-25","Assurance","The embankment illustrated as Plot 4 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C58.12","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","4.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker as far as reasonably practicable to reduce the depth of the environmental mitigation planting on the Red Land and reduce the gradient on the Green Land in order that the Petitioner’s land holding is more readily available for agricultural use.\r\n4.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 4.1 are that:\r\n4.2.1. the proposed reduction in the environmental mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 4.1 does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n4.2.2. the proposed reduction in the environmental mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 4.1 does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n4.2.3. the proposed reduction in the environmental mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 4.1 receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill. \r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“the Green Land” means the land coloured green on the enclosed plan [attached to beneficiary letter] bearing the reference CT06-237;\r\n\r\n“the Red Land” means the land edged red on the enclosed plan [attached to beneficiary letter]bearing the reference CT-06-237.\r\n","Reduce Land Take at Lanes End \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 3 in response to request 4","2018-06-25","Assurance","The Red Land and the Green Land as shown attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C58.13","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","5.1. The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to reduce the extent of the landscape mitigation planting proposed to be located within the Yellow Land for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the Works.\r\n5.2. This assurance is subject to:\r\n5.2.1. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 5.1 does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environ-mental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n5.2.2. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 5.1 does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n5.2.3. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 5.1 receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“the Yellow Land” means the land coloured yellow on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] numbered CT-06-239 as deposited with the Bill. The land has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of landscape mitigation.\r\n","Reduction of Land Take at Sutch Farm \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 4 in response to request 5","2018-06-25","Assurance","The Yellow Land as shown attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C58.14","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","6.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker where reasonably practicable not to prevent the Petitioner’s access to Wrinehill Road from the Petitioner’s land holding to the areas of land shown edged blue on the copy of plan CT-05-237 as illustrated on slide A215 (19) of the Petitioner’s exhibits during the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Access\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 5 in response to request 6","2018-06-25","Assurance","The Petitioner’s access to Wrinehill Road from the Petitioner’s land holding to the areas of land shown edged blue on the copy of plan CT-05-237 as illustrated on slide A215 (19) of the Petitioner’s exhibits \r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C58.15","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","7.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker not to prevent the Petitioner’s access to the land at Lanes End Farm during the operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Access\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 6 in response to request 7","2018-06-25","Assurance","The Petitioner’s access to the land at Lanes End Farm\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C58.16","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","8.1. Where an existing private water supply to the Petitioner is adversely and directly, affected by the construction of the Works, the nominated undertaker will, if requested by Petitioner to do so, provide or procure or meet the reasonable cost of the provision of an alternative supply of water where reasonably practicable to do so and if there is no other practicable alternative means of supply available.\r\n8.2. Where the supply is so affected temporarily by the construction of the Proposed Works, then the alternative supply need only be supplied for the period during which it is so affected. \r\n8.3. Where a request is made by Petitioner under 8.1 for a permanent supply due to permanent severance of the existing supply caused by the construction of the Works the nominated under-taker will where provision of an alternative means of supply can be demonstrated by the Petitioner to be reasonably required for his business, provide or procure or meet the reasonable cost of a permanent means of alternative supply of water.\r\n","Water Supply \r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 7 in response to request 8","2018-06-25","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.17","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","9.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner and any appointed agent to develop a plan which the Petitioner’s current farming enterprise may be reasonably adjusted during and after the construction of the Proposed Scheme, with a view to agreeing a reasonable business case.\r\n","Business Mitigation\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 8 in response to request 9 ","2018-06-25","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.18","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","10.1.\tThe Secretary of State will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with the Petitioner, where a business case is approved and where it relates to the provision of additional farm infrastructure necessary for the Petitioner’s farm business in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Secretary of State of freehold land required for that business, such agreement to provide that compensation, in accordance with the Compensation Code, will be paid in advance of entry, subject to the Secretary of State being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured.\r\n10.2.The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the provision of additional farm infrastructure required as a result of the impact of the Proposed Scheme on the Petitioner’s holding where the additional infrastructure is either: \r\n10.2.1. to be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or \r\n10.2.2. the subject of a separate application for planning consent. \r\n10.3. The assistance referred to in paragraph 10.2 shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for the provision of additional farm infra-structure. \r\n10.4. Paragraph 10.5 applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 10.1 a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 10.1 and required to give effect to the provision of additional farm infrastructure, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill. \r\n10.5. Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 10.3 shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to rein-statement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper C7: Business Relocation.\r\n10.6. In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work pro-posed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural infra-structure(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented. \r\n10.7. in this assurance, “additional farm infrastructure” means the development of a facility for storage of slurry required to reinstate part of the Petitioner’s farm undertaking which is impacted as a result of the exercise of the powers of the Bill resulting in the loss of freehold land. \r\n","Additional Infrastructure\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton assurance 9 in response to request 10","2018-06-25","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.19","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","11.1. The Secretary of State for Transport will require the nominated undertaker to both agree to the employment of a qualified independent ecological expert and reimburse the reasonable costs in order to undertake any and all necessary ecological surveys at the Petitioner’s land holding to ensure that the provision of slurry storage is complaint with all necessary regulatory frameworks in respect of the safe and appropriate storage of slurry and farm effluent. \r\n11.2. This assurance is subject to:-\r\n11.2.1. The commencement and adherence to Assurance No. 10; \r\n11.2.2. the Petitioner’s appropriate  business case being approved; and \r\n11.2.3. the Compensation Code","Environmental Surveys\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton, assurance 10 in response to request 11","2018-06-25","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.20","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","1.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker where reasonably practicable to seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the proposed ecological mitigation in the Yellow Land for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the Works.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\"the Yellow Land\" means the land coloured yellow on the attached [attached to beneficiary letter] Bill plan Sheet No. 1-60 and CT-05 and CT-06 maps;\r\n“the Petitioner” means David Sutton, Sarah Sutton, Edward Sutton, Paul Sutton and John Sutton trading as D & S C Sutton of Oakhanger Hall, Taylors Lane, Oakhanger, Crewe, CW1 5XD\r\n","Ecological Mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","2018-10-29","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C58.21","N/A","HoC/0075","David, Sarah, Edward, Paul and John Sutton","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tom Selby and Tony Rimmer (Rostons), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Oakhanger Hall, Crewe, CW1 5XD","Cheshire East"]
["C59","Proudlove, David","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C59.1","N/A","HoC/0073","David Proudlove","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into  account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant  owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Proudlove, assurance 1","2018-06-11","Assurance","Heath Farm, Crewe, CW2 5NQ","Cheshire East"]
["C59.2","N/A","HoC/0073","David Proudlove","2.1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· A pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· A target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n· A method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· Advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· Recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· Advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· Advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· A schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· A final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2. Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3. The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4. The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Proudlove, assurance 2","2018-06-11","Assurance","Heath Farm, Crewe, CW2 5NQ","Cheshire East"]
["C59.3","N/A","HoC/0073","David Proudlove","3.1.Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2. Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3. Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Proudlove, assurance 3","2018-06-11","Assurance","Heath Farm, Crewe, CW2 5NQ","Cheshire East"]
["C59.4","N/A","HoC/0073","David Proudlove","1.1 The Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Red Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below.\r\n1.2 The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to:\r\na. the Secretary of State being satisfied that the ecological mitigation, which was provided on a precautionary basis, can be reduced in extent, without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\nb. the Secretary of State being of the view that the removal of the ecological mitigation can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\nc. consent from the local planning authority.\r\n1.3  The nominated undertaker will where reasonably practicable modify the design of the balancing pond and access road on the Green Land for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the works.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“the Red Land” means the land shown in red on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 44 in the Borough of Cheshire East as shown on Replacement Sheet No. 1-61 of the plans deposited with the Additional Provision (March 2018) (the relevant Additional Provision Plans are appended and referenced as Plan 2 for the relevant Construction Phase Plan and Plan 3 for the relevant Scheme Plan), an area of proposed ecological mitigation;\r\n“the Green Land” means the land shown in green on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 44 in the Borough of Cheshire East as shown on Replacement Sheet No. 1-61 of the plans deposited with the Additional Provision (March 2018) (the relevant Additional Provision Plans are appended and referenced as Plan 2 for the relevant Construction Phase Plan and Plan 3 for the relevant Scheme Plan), an area of a proposed access road, and balancing pond;\r\n“Work No.118” means the scheduled work authorised by the Bill and as shown marked Work No.118 on Sheets 1-61 and 1-62 of the Parliamentary Plans.\r\n","Mitigation Planting\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Proudlove, assurance 1","2018-06-25","Assurance","The land shown in red on the attached plan being part of the land in plot 44 in the Borough of Cheshire East as shown on Replacement Sheet No. 1-61 of the plans deposited with the Additional Provision (March 2018)","Cheshire East"]
["C59.5","N/A","HoC/0073","David Proudlove","3.1. Subject to the successful promotion of the Proposed Scheme and the exercise of the powers conferred on the Promoter under the Bill, the Promoter will exercise the relevant powers under the Bill to acquire the severed land.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“the severed land” means the areas shown indicatively as outlined in blue on the plan in exhibit A213(10)","Severed Land\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Proudlove, assurance 3","2018-06-25","Assurance","The areas shown indicatively as outlined in blue on the plan in exhibit A213(10)","Cheshire East"]
["C59.6","N/A","HoC/0073","David Proudlove","4.1. Subject to the successful promotion of an Additional Provision to the Bill which confers both the power to acquire compulsorily the Heath Farm Access Land and deemed planning permission for the Farm Access Track for the purposes of providing access to Heath Farm and to the condition in paragraph 4.2, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to construct the Farm Access Track.\r\n4.2. The condition referred to in paragraph 4.1 is that the Petitioner owns the Heath Farm Access Land or that the consents of any third party interests in the Heath Farm Access Land required to construct the Farm Access Track have been secured.\r\n4.3. The Farm Access Track will be constructed from Work No.118 to the south side of Heath Farm by the shortest route possible, as shown indicatively on the attached Plan 1, and, following construction, the nominated undertaker will not be liable for maintenance of the Farm Access Track.\r\n4.4. The assurance in paragraph 4.1 is subject to the nominated undertaker concluding that construction of the Farm Access Track would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Farm Access Track” means a metalled access track from Work No.118 to Heath Farm as shown indicatively on the attached Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n“Heath Farm” means Heath Farm, Newcastle Road, Chorlton, Crewe, Cheshire, CW2 5NQ;\r\n“Heath Farm Access Land” means the land shown indicatively shaded blue and edged with a dotted line on the attached Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter];","Access to Heath Farm\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Proudlove, assurance 4 ","2018-06-25","Assurance","An access track from Work No.118 to Heath Farm as shown indicatively on the attached Plan 1 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C59.7","N/A","HoC/0073","David Proudlove","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tom Selby and Tony Rimmer (Rostons), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Heath Farm, Crewe, CW2 5NQ","Cheshire East"]
["C60","Mawbey, Sharon and Martin and Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C60.1","N/A","HoC/0192, AP1/0028","Sharon and Martin Mawbey, Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd","1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in constructing the utility diversion in the Hoo Mill Lane area to use reasonable endeavours to maintain access to the Property at all times.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\"Property\" means Lock Cottage, Hoo Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Staffordshire ST18 0RG and/or Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd, The Workshops, Hoo Mill Lane, Great Haywood, ST18 0RG.","Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Sharon and Martin Mawbey, Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd","2018-06-08","Assurance","Lock Cottage, Hoo Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Staffordshire ST18 0RG and/or Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd, The Workshops, Hoo Mill Lane, Great Haywood, ST18 0RG.\r\n\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C60.2","N/A\t\t","HoC/0192, AP1/0028","Sharon and Martin Mawbey, Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in the exercise of the powers of the Bill to limit the external elevation of the building or buildings comprising the Trent South Embankment Temporary Worker Accommodation to two storeys.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Trent South Embankment Temporary Worker Accommodation” means the temporary worker accommodation proposed for the Trent South embankment main compound as set out at paragraph 2.3.32 of the Colwich to Yarlet Community Area 2 report in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill and shown on Map CT-05-212 in grid squares F1 to F3.”","Trent South Embankment Temporary Worker Accommodation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Sharon and Martin Mawbey, Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd","2018-11-13","Assurance","The temporary worker accommodation proposed for the Trent South embankment main compound, shown on Map CT-05-212 in grid squares F1 to F3.","Stafford Borough"]
["C60.3","N/A\t\t","HoL/0034","Sharon and Martin Mawbey, Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd","Provided that the Petitioners enter into the Advance Mitigation and Loss Payment Agreement (“Agreement”), the Secretary of State confirms that the Petitioners will be paid an advance payment of compensation in accordance with the Compensation Code in respect of the Petitioners’ property interests affected by the exercise of compulsory purchase powers to be conferred under the Bill within 90 days of completion of that Agreement in accordance with the terms of that Agreement.\r\n“In these assurances:-\r\n“Advance Mitigation and Loss Payment Agreement” means the agreement to be entered into between the Secretary of State and the Petitioners in substantially the same terms as the agreement attached to this assurance;\r\n","Advance Mitigation and Loss Payment Agreement\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Sharon and Martin Mawbey, Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd, assurance 1","2020-09-09","Assurance","Lock Cottage, Hoo Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Stafford ST18 0RG","Stafford Borough"]
["C60.4","N/A\t\t","HoL/0034","Sharon and Martin Mawbey, Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd","Once the Bill has received Royal Assent, the Secretary of State will not enter on to the Petitioners’ property under section 11(1) of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 or section 8 of the Compulsory Purchase (Vesting Declarations) Act 1981 before December 2022 and will require that the nominated undertaker does not enter that land under the powers contained in Schedule 15 to the Bill before December 2022.\r\n","Date of Entry\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Sharon and Martin Mawbey, Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd, assurance 2","2020-09-09","Assurance","Lock Cottage, Hoo Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Stafford ST18 0RG","Stafford Borough"]
["C60.5","N/A\t\t","HoL/0034","Sharon and Martin Mawbey, Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd","The Promoter will continue to engage with the Petitioners and will use reasonable endeavours to reach a final agreement with you as soon as practicable on terms that are agreeable to both parties.\r\n\r\n","Reasonable Endeavours\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Sharon and Martin Mawbey, Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd, assurance 1","2020-11-23","Assurance","Lock Cottage, Hoo Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Stafford ST18 0RG","Stafford Borough"]
["C60.6","N/A","HoL/0034","Sharon and Martin Mawbey, Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport\r\n","Various","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and Sharon and Martin Mawbey, Engineering and Canal Services of Great Haywood Ltd","2023-05-11","Undertaking","Various","Stafford Borough"]
["C61","Roxane (UK) Limited","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C61.1","N/A","HoC/0101","Roxane (UK) Limited\t","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport\r\n","Various","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and Roxane (UK) Limited","2018-06-12","Undertaking","Wood End Lane, Fradley, Lichfield,\r\nWS13 8EL","Lichfield District"]
["C62","H R J Gould Properties Ltd","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C62.1","N/A","HoC/0021","H R J Gould Properties","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R J Gould Properties Ltd, assurance 1","2018-06-13","Assurance","Crabtree Farm, Park Lane,\r\nRugeley, WS15 3LX","Stafford Borough"]
["C62.2","N/A","HoC/0021","H R J Gould Properties","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R J Gould Properties Ltd, assurance 2","2018-06-13","Assurance","Crabtree Farm, Park Lane,\r\nRugeley, WS15 3LX","Stafford Borough"]
["C62.3","N/A","HoC/0021","H R J Gould Properties","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property Crab Tree Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Crab Tree Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R J Gould Properties Ltd, assurance 3","2018-06-13","Assurance","Crabtree Farm, Park Lane,\r\nRugeley, WS15 3LX","Stafford Borough"]
["C62.4","N/A","HoC/0021","H R J Gould Properties","4.1 \tProvided that–\r\n4.1.1 \tthe Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1 \tprovides that the Property Crab Tree Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3\tprovides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R J Gould Properties Ltd, assurance 4","2018-06-13","Assurance","Crabtree Farm, Park Lane,\r\nRugeley, WS15 3LX","Stafford Borough"]
["C62.5","N/A","HoC/0021","H R J Gould Properties","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R J Gould Properties Ltd, assurance 5","2018-06-13","Assurance","Crabtree Farm, Park Lane,\r\nRugeley, WS15 3LX","Stafford Borough"]
["C62.6","N/A","HoC/0021","H R J Gould Properties","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Crab Tree Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R J Gould Properties Ltd, assurance 6","2018-06-13","Assurance","Crabtree Farm, Park Lane,\r\nRugeley, WS15 3LX","Stafford Borough"]
["C62.7","N/A","HoC/0021","H R J Gould Properties","7.1  If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Crab Tree Farm the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R J Gould Properties Ltd, assurance 7","2018-06-13","Assurance","Crabtree Farm, Park Lane,\r\nRugeley, WS15 3LX","Stafford Borough"]
["C62.8","N/A","HoC/0021","H R J Gould Properties","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R J Gould Properties Ltd, assurance 8","2018-06-13","Assurance","Crabtree Farm, Park Lane,\r\nRugeley, WS15 3LX","Stafford Borough"]
["C62.9","N/A","HoC/0021","H R J Gould Properties","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R J Gould Properties Ltd, assurance 1","2019-02-19","Assurance","Crabtree Farm, Park Lane,\r\nRugeley, WS15 3LX","Stafford Borough"]
["C62.10","N/A","HoC/0021","H R J Gould Properties","2.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to H R J Gould Properties Ltd, assurance 2 ","2019-02-19","Assurance","Crabtree Farm, Park Lane,\r\nRugeley, WS15 3LX","Stafford Borough"]
["C62.11","N/A","HoC/0021","H R J Gould Properties","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Crabtree Farm, Park Lane,\r\nRugeley, WS15 3LX","Stafford Borough"]
["C63","Carney, Christopher and Carol","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C63.1","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurance 1","2018-06-14","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.2","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurance 2","2018-06-14","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.3","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property Upper Moreton Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Upper Moreton Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurance 3","2018-06-14","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.4","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","4.1 Provided that–\r\n4.1.1  the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1 \tprovides that the Property Upper Moreton Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3\t provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2   the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurance 4","2018-06-14","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.5","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurance 5","2018-06-14","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.6","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Upper Moreton Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurance 6","2018-06-14","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.7","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Upper Moreton Farm the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurance 7","2018-06-14","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.8","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2  Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurance 8","2018-06-14","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.9","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","OPTION A\r\n1.The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to:  \r\n (1) liaise with the Petitioner and provide as soon as reasonably practicable notice of  commencement of the construction of the Authorised Works; \r\n(2) if requested by the Petitioner, provide reasonable support to the Petitioner in submitting the planning application for the alternative location to be used for the Petitioner’s Farm Care activities, including payment of the reasonable cost of the application and providing, if required, the statement of impact and timing; \r\n(3) pay the reasonable costs of:\r\n(i) the relocation for the duration of the construction period; and, \r\n(ii) if required by the Petitioner following completion of the construction of the Authorised Works, reinstatement of the existing classrooms in its current location;\r\n4) provide reasonably suitable and convenient welfare facilities at the alternative location.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“alternative classrooms” means the relocated or replacement existing classrooms required as a result of the impact of the Proposed Scheme on the existing classrooms;\r\n “existing classrooms” means the number of existing portable units (at the time of this assurance) on the Petitioner’s Property used as classrooms for the purpose of the Petitioner’s Care Farm activities;\r\n“the Head of Acquisitions” means Michael Eckett or one of his direct reports or any successor which shall be communicated in advance to the Petitioner;\r\n “Petitioner’s Care Farm activities” means the provision of care farming facilities and therapy through agricultural activity for vulnerable individuals with learning difficulties, disabilities and/or special needs;\r\n“Petitioner’s Property” means Upper Moreton Farm, Bishton Lane, Wolseley Bridge, Stafford ST18 0XD, comprising Upper Moreton Farm Community Interest Company and `Care Farm’;\r\n\"the noise barrier\" means the noise barriers, or equivalent, to be constructed in the Parish of Colton on Work No. 17 between point 'A' and point 'B' as shown on the attached plans [attached to beneficiary letter]. The plans referred to in this assurance are attached to this letter as Annex A;\r\n “statement of impact and timing”  means a statement describing the impact of the authorised works on the Petitioner’s Care Farm activities and the timescales in which those impacts may affect the Petitioner’s Farm Care activities; and\r\n“welfare facilities” means toilet and kitchenette facilities to be provided to the Petitioner as part of the relocation; \r\n","Alternative classrooms\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurance 1","2018-06-26","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.10","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","OPTION B \r\n2.  The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to, in so far as it is reasonably practicable, provide noise barriers of up to 3m or equivalent above rail height or equivalent, between the sections of the railway marked as 'A' and 'B' shown on the attached plans [attached to beneficiary letter]. This assurance is subject to approvals by the relevant planning authority under Schedule 17 of the Bill.\r\n","Noise barrier \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurance 2","2018-06-26","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.11","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","3. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to use appropriate hoarding to screen the Authorised Works from the Petitioner’s Property as set out in Section 5.6 of the draft Code of Construction Practice. Mitigation planting with a landscape mitigation function will be established in advance of the construction of the Authorised Works, where reasonably practicable.\r\n","Construction hoarding\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurance 3","2018-06-26","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.12","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","4. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to provide fencing around the balancing pond located on the Petitioner’s Property during the operation of the Proposed Scheme. The fencing provided will take account of the needs of the users of the Care Farm. \r\n","Balancing pond \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurance 4","2018-06-26","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.13","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","1.  The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to: \r\n1.1 \tprovide reasonable support to the Petitioner in submitting the planning application for the alternative classrooms, including payment of the reasonable cost of the application; and\r\n1.2\tpay the reasonable costs of providing the alternative classrooms.\r\n2.  The assurances at paragraph 1 are subject to a methodology and specification for the construction of the alternative classrooms and the terms of payment pursuant to those assurances being agreed at the Case Management Steering Group.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“alternative classrooms” means the good quality second-hand alternative portable unit classrooms to be provided by the Petitioner in the Alternative Classroom Location required as a result of the impact of the Proposed Scheme on the existing classrooms;\r\n“Alternative Classroom Location” means the area of the Petitioner’s Property edged red on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter]; \r\n“existing classrooms” means portable units on the Petitioner’s Property used as classrooms for the purpose of the Petitioner’s Care Farm activities;\r\n“Petitioner’s Care Farm activities” means the provision of care farming facilities and therapy through agricultural activity for vulnerable individuals with learning difficulties, disabilities and/or special needs;\r\n“Case Management Steering Group” means the group established by the nominated undertaker pursuant to the assurance at paragraph 4 in the assurance letter dated 26 June 2018 from the Promoter to the Petitioner’s agent.\r\n","Alternative classrooms\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher and Carol Carney, assurances 1 & 2","2019-02-05","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.14","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 1","2019-02-15","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.15","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","2.1 The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the relocation of any agricultural buildings displaced for the purposes of the project where the replacement is either:\r\n2.1.1  to be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or\r\n2.1.2  the subject of a separate application for planning consent.\r\n2.2  The assistance referred to in paragraph 2.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for relocation of an agricultural building.\r\n2.3  Paragraph 2.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 2.1. a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 2.1. and required to give effect to the relocation of an agricultural building, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill.\r\n2.4  Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 2.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Information Paper C7, Business Relocation.\r\n2.5 In this assurance, “agricultural building” includes a residential building occupied as part of an agricultural building.\r\n2.6 In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.\r\n","Relocation of agricultural buildings \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 2","2019-02-15","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.16","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","3.1  If prior to the giving of notice of entry or prior to the notice of vesting under a general vesting declaration to acquire land permanently (whether or not before Royal Assent) the Petitioner identifies suitable land for the relocation of an agricultural building (whether within or outside the Petitioner’s ownership) and the Petitioner provides to the Secretary of State a detailed course of action substantiating the relocation, the Secretary of State will confirm whether or not he accepts that the land identified and evidence supporting the course of action provides a reasonable basis for the Petitioner’s claim for compensation in the event that the Bill receives Royal Assent and the  Secretary of State exercises his powers of compulsory acquisition.\r\n3.2 In this assurance, “agricultural building” includes a residential building occupied as part of an agricultural building.","Identification of land for the relocation of agricultural buildings \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 3","2019-02-15","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.17","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","4.1 The Promoter acknowledges that proper professional costs and fees reasonably incurred by the Petitioner for the purposes of seeking to identify suitable alternative premises at which to relocate an agricultural building which is subject to the power of compulsory acquisition under the Bill, will form a Head of Claim as part of any disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of that land under the Bill.","Professional costs and fees \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 4","2019-02-15","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.18","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","5.1  The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n5.2  The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n5.3  The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n5.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n5.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n5.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 5","2019-02-15","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C63.19","N/A","HoC/0041","Christopher and Carol Carney","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, (Hinson & Parry), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Upper Moreton Farm,\r\nStafford, ST18 0XD","Stafford Borough"]
["C64","Fenton, T A and Partners and Richard Fenton","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C64.1","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton, assurance 1","2018-06-14","Assurance","Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C64.2","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","2.1  The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to T A Fenton and Partners  and Richard Fenton, assurance 2","2018-06-14","Assurance","Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C64.3","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property The Ashton Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property The Ashton Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance. ","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to T A Fenton and Partners  and Richard Fenton, assurance 3","2018-06-14","Assurance","Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C64.4","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","4.1 Provided that–\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1 \tprovides that the Property The Ashton Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3\tprovides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to T A Fenton and Partners  and Richard Fenton, assurance 4","2018-06-14","Assurance","Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C64.5","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to T A Fenton and Partners  and Richard Fenton, assurance 5","2018-06-14","Assurance","Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C64.6","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property The Ashton Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne(HS2) to T A Fenton and Partners  and Richard Fenton, assurance 6","2018-06-14","Assurance","Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C64.7","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property The Ashton Farm the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne(HS2) to T A Fenton and Partners  and Richard Fenton, assurance 7","2018-06-14","Assurance","Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C64.8","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to T A Fenton and Partners  and Richard Fenton, assurance 8","2018-06-14","Assurance","Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C64.9","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, in carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, to use reasonable endeavours to relocate the hedgerows within the Petitioner’s landholding, shown on land parcels 34 and 38 on Bill plan 1-40, subject to identifying an alternate site within Bill limits which can be utilised for the purposes of the relocation, subject to the following conditions:\r\n1. The Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents in order to relocate the hedgerow to the alternative site; \r\n2. That the alternative site will not create any new or different environmental effects than those reported in the Environmental Statement;\r\n3. That the hedgerow can be relocated without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Hedgerow relocation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton assurance 1, 2 and 3","2018-06-22","Assurance","the hedgerows within the Petitioner’s landholding, shown on land parcels 34 and 38 on Bill plan 1-40, Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C64.10","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to work with the Petitioner and seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the detailed design of ecological mitigation for the purposes of providing access to the Petitioner’s Property along the existing track through existing gate through mitigation planting following the completion of construction of the works.\r\nNothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the Proposed Scheme but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Petitioner’s Property” means The Ashton Farm, Eccleshall, Staffordshire, ST21 6LS;","Plant mitigation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to T A Fenton and Partners  and Richard Fenton ","2018-06-25","Assurance","Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C64.11","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to T A Fenton and Partners  and Richard Fenton, assurance 1.1","2019-03-05","Assurance","Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C64.12","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to T A Fenton and Partners  and Richard Fenton assurance 2","2019-03-05","Assurance","Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C64.13","N/A","HoC/0050","T A Fenton and Partners and Richard Fenton","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Ashton Farm, Eccleshall,\r\nStafford, ST21 6LS","Stafford Borough"]
["C65","Bannister, Leslie and George","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C65.1","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Leslie and George Bannister, assurance 1","2018-06-15","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.2","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Leslie and George Bannister, assurance 2","2018-06-15","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.3","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property Lount Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Lount Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Leslie and George Bannister, assurance 3","2018-06-15","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.4","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","4.1 Provided that –\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1 \tprovides that the Property Lount Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3\tprovides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Leslie and George Bannister, assurance 4","2018-06-15","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.5","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Leslie and George Bannister, assurance 5","2018-06-15","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.6","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Lount Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Leslie and George Bannister, assurance 6","2018-06-15","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.7","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Lount Farm the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Leslie and George Bannister, assurance 7","2018-06-15","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.8","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Leslie and George Bannister, assurance 8","2018-06-15","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.9","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","1. Subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 2 below, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker following completion of the works to use reasonable endeavours to provide access from the Colwich Bridleway Accommodation Green Overbridge in the approximate position shown at point D on the attached plan.\r\n2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 above are:\r\n2.1 the Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents;\r\n2.2 approval of the highway authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill; \r\n2.3 the provision of access not resulting in creating any new or different environmental effects than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and\r\n2.4 the construction of the track not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme. \r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes\r\n","Access from the Colwich Bridleway Accommodation Green Overbridge \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Leslie and George Bannister.  Access from the Colwich Bridleway Accommodation Green Overbridge, assurances 1 and 2","2018-06-25","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.10","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","Subject to detailed design, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to:\r\n1. provide a culvert in an approximate location indicated by three points A, B and C on the attached Bill plan; and  \r\n2. provide a hard surface track from a point 390 meters north-east of the junction of Bridleway Colton 58 and Footpath Colton 59 and terminating at a point 85 meters north of its commencement (as described as Work No. 28 in the Bill).","Access across wetland\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Leslie and George Bannister.  Access across wetland, assurances 1 and 2","2018-06-25","Assurance","The approximate location indicated by three points A, B and C on the Bill plan  attached to the letter; and  \r\nfrom a point 390 meters north-east of the junction of Bridleway Colton 58 and Footpath Colton 59 and terminating at a point 85 meters north of its commencement\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.11","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","1. The Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the area coloured yellow on the attached plan for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the condition in paragraph 2 below.\r\n2. The assurance in paragraph 1 is subject to:\r\n(a)  the Secretary of State being satisfied that relocating the ecological mitigation  to the area coloured  orange on the attached plan  does not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n(b) the Secretary of State being of the view that the relocation  of the ecological mitigation can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n(c) approval  from the local planning authority\r\n","Ecological mitigation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Leslie and George Bannister. Removal of trees, assurances 1 and 2","2018-06-25","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.12","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 1","2019-02-14","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.13","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","2.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 2","2019-02-14","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C65.14","N/A","HoC/0025","Leslie and George Bannister","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company) Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Lount Farm, Rugeley, WS15 3LR","Stafford Borough"]
["C66","Furnival, John and Jane","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C66.1","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1  seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr John and Mrs Jane Furnival, assurance 1 ","2018-06-19","Assurance","Manor Farm, Crewe, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.2","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr John and Mrs Jane Furnival, assurance 2 ","2018-06-19","Assurance","Manor Farm, Crewe, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.3","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property, Manor Farm, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Manor Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr John and Mrs Jane Furnival, assurance 3 ","2018-06-19","Assurance","Manor Farm, Crewe, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.4","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","4.1 Provided that–\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1\tprovides that the Property Manor Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3\tprovides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr John and Mrs Jane Furnival, assurance 4 ","2018-06-19","Assurance","Manor Farm, Crewe, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.5","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr John and Mrs Jane Furnival, assurance 5","2018-06-19","Assurance","Manor Farm, Crewe, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.6","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Manor Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr John and Mrs Jane Furnival, assurance 6.1","2018-06-19","Assurance","Manor Farm, Crewe, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.7","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Manor Farm the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr John and Mrs Jane Furnival, assurance 7.1","2018-06-19","Assurance","Manor Farm, Crewe, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.8","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2  Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr John and Mrs Jane Furnival, assurance 8","2018-06-19","Assurance","Manor Farm, Crewe, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.9","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","\r\n4.1.The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to maintain access from Manor Road to Area 4 during the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Area 4” means the land edged red and numbered 4 in the Petitioner's exhibit No. A218(10)\r\n\r\n","Maintenance of Access from Manor Road to Area 4","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 4.1 in response to request 4","2018-06-23","Assurance","The land edged red and numbered 4 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(10)","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.10","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","\r\n5.1. Subject to the successful promotion of an Additional Provision the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in exercise of the powers contained in the Bill to maintain access from Manor Road Farm to Areas 6, 7 and 8 during the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Area 6” means the land edged green and numbered 6 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(10); \r\n\r\n“Area 7” means the land edged yellow and numbered 7 but excludes the area edged red and labelled excluded, as in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(10);\r\n\r\n“Area 8” means the land edged purple and numbered 8 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(10); \r\n","Access During Construction","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 5.1 in response to request 5","2018-06-23","Assurance","The land edged yellow and numbered 5 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(14); the land edged green and numbered 6 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(10); and  the land edged yellow and numbered 7 but excluding the area edged red and labelled excluded, as in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(10).","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.11","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","\r\n6.1 Subject to the successful promotion of an Additional Provision, the Secretary of State will not require the use of Area 7.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Area 7” means the land edged yellow and numbered 7 but excludes the area edged red and labelled excluded, as in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(10)\r\n","\"Area 7\" no longer required \t","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 6.1 in response to request 6","2018-06-23","Assurance","The land edged yellow and numbered 7 but excluding the area edged red and labelled excluded, as in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(10)","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.12","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","9.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker where reasonably practicable to realign the access tracks alongside the Manor Road Bridge as illustrated on the Secretary of State’s exhibit No 735(2) to ensure livestock are transported efficiently.","Access Tracks - Alignment","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 9.1 in response to request 9","2018-06-23","Assurance","The Manor Road Bridge as illustrated on the Secretary of State’s exhibit No 735(2)","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.13","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","10.1.The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker where reasonably practicable to design and construct the Manor Road access track as illustrated on the Secretary of State’s exhibit No. 735(4) for use of livestock following  the construction of the Proposed Scheme subject to:\r\n\r\n10.1.1.\tthe proposed design referred to in paragraph 10.1 does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n10.1.2.\tthe proposed design referred to in paragraph 10.1 does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n\r\n10.1.3.\tthe proposed design  referred to in paragraph 10.1 receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.","Access Track - Construction Traffic ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 10 om response to request 10","2018-06-23","Assurance","The Manor Road access track as illustrated on the Secretary of State’s exhibit No. 735(4)","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.14","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","11.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker where reasonably practicable to extend the Manor Road access track for the purposes of facilitating the Petitioner’s effective access from point A to B as illustrated on the Secretary of State’s exhibit No. 735(4).","Access Track Extension","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 11.1 in response to request 11","2018-06-23","Assurance","The Manor Road access track  from point A to B as illustrated on the Secretary of State’s exhibit No. 735(4).\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.15","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","\r\n12.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to not to restrict access to Area 5 where reasonably practicable during operation of the Proposed Scheme for the purposes of the Petitioner’s access.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Area 5” means the land edged yellow and numbered 5 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(14)\r\n","Access to Area 5","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 12.1 in response to request 12 ","2018-06-23","Assurance","The land edged yellow and numbered 5 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(14)","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.16","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","\r\n14.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to remove the width of the landscape mitigation planting on Area 3 and introduce an area of hedgerow habitat creation, subject to the conditions set out in 14.2.\r\n\r\n14.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 14.1 are that:\r\n\r\n14.2.1. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 14.1 does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n14.2.2. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 14.1 does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n\r\n14.2.3. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 14.1 receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Area 3” means the land edged green and numbered 3 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(14)\r\n","Landscape Mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 14 in response to request 14","2018-06-23","Assurance","The land edged green and numbered 3 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(14)","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.17","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","\r\n15.1. The Secretary of State shall not use Area 5 for the provision of equipment storage, subject to the successful promotion of an Additional Provision that removes WCML equipment.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Area 5” means the land edged yellow and numbered 5 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(14)\r\n","Provision of equipment storage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 15.1 in response to request 15","2018-06-23","Assurance","The land edged yellow and numbered 5 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(14)","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.18","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","\r\n18.1.\tThe Secretary of State will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with the Petitioner, where a business case is approved and where it relates to the provision of Additional Farm Infrastructure necessary for the Petitioner’s farm business in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Secretary of State of land required for that business, such agreement to provide that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Secretary of State being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Additional Farm Infrastructure” means \r\n• Cubicle housing for 250 cows;\r\n• Feed pad for cows;\r\n• Additional slurry storage; and\r\n• Concrete silage pits.\r\n","Provision of Additional Farm Infrastructure matters","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 18.1 in response to request 18","2018-06-23","Assurance","Manor Farm, Manor Farm Road, Madeley, Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.19","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","\r\n18.2.The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the provision of Additional Farm Infrastructure required as a result of the impact of the project on the holding where the Additional Farm Infrastructure is either:\r\n\r\n18.2.1.\tto be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or \r\n\r\n18.2.2.\tthe subject of a separate application for planning consent.\r\n\r\n18.3.The assistance referred to in paragraph 18.2 shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for the provision of Additional Farm Infrastructure. \r\n\r\n18.4. Paragraph 18.5 applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 18.2, a Petitioner provides to the Secretary of State evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Secretary of State that consent referred to in paragraph 18.2 and required to give effect to the provision of additional farm infrastructure, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill.\r\n\r\n18.5. Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 18.4 shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper C7: Business Relocation. \r\n\r\n18.6. In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Additional Farm Infrastructure” means \r\n• Cubicle housing for 250 cows;\r\n• Feed pad for cows;\r\n• Additional slurry storage; and\r\n• Concrete silage pits.","Provision of Additional Farm Infrastructure","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurances 18.2 to 18.6 in response to request 18","2018-06-23","Assurance","Manor Farm, Manor Farm Road, Madeley, Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.20","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","18.7. Objective - Appropriate representatives of the Promoter and the Petitioner will form a Working Group to collaborate to consider farming activities at Manor Farm that can reasonably be maintained during construction of the Proposed Scheme and any restoration period thereafter.\r\n\r\n18.8. Duration - The Working Group is to be established as soon as reasonably practicable and will meet until the opening of the House of Lords petitioning period, which is yet to be announced. \r\n\r\n18.9. Meetings - The Working Group shall meet at least once every quarter with additional meetings scheduled as necessary. The meetings will be chaired by the Head of Acquisitions. \r\n\r\n18.10. Terms of Reference - The members agreed to develop a terms of reference for the Working Group as soon as it reasonably practicable.","Working Group","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurances 18.7 to 18.10 in response to request 18","2018-06-23","Assurance","Manor Farm, Manor Farm Road, Madeley, Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.21","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","19.1. The nominated undertaker will identify with the Petitioner existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans. \r\n\r\n19.2. The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the nominated undertaker. \r\n\r\n19.3. The nominated undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the Petitioner in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions. \r\n\r\n19.4. Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the Works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the Petitioner which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required. \r\n\r\n19.5. As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the Petitioner as appropriate by the nominated undertaker. \r\n\r\n19.6. Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the Works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the Petitioner.\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 19 in response to request 19","2018-06-23","Assurance","Manor Farm, Manor Farm Road, Madeley, Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.22","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","20.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to undertake soil surveys on the Petitioner’s land holding, on areas where productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the Works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land-raising. Data from the soil surveys will be used to set a target specification for the soils within the Petitioner’s holding, which will be used to return agricultural soils in order to enable their former use prior to the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Soil","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 20.1 in response to request 20","2018-06-23","Assurance","Manor Farm, Manor Farm Road, Madeley, Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 9PS","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.23","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","\r\n7.1 Subject to the successful promotion of an Additional Provision, the Secretary of State will not require the use of Area 8\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Area 8” means the land edged purple and numbered 8 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(10)\r\n","\"Area 8\" not required","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 7.1 in response to request 7 ","2018-06-25","Assurance","The land edged purple and numbered 8 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(10)","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.24","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","12.2. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker not to restrict access to Area 5a where reasonably practicable during operation of the Proposed Scheme for the purposes of the Petitioner’s access.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n “Area 5a” means the land edged yellow and numbered 5a on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n","Access to Area 5a","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 12.2","2018-10-08","Assurance","The land edged yellow and numbered 5a on Plan 1, attached to the letter.","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.25","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","14.2. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to remove the width of the landscape mitigation planting on Area 4 and introduce an area of hedgerow habitat creation, subject to the conditions set out in 14.3.\r\n14.3. The conditions referred to in paragraph 14.2 are that:\r\n14.3.1. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 14.2 does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n14.3.2. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 14.2 does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n14.3.3. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 14.2 receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n “Area 4” means the land edged green and numbered 4 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(14)\r\n","Landscape Mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer, assurance 14.2 - 14.3","2018-10-08","Assurance","The land edged green and numbered 4 in the Petitioner’s exhibit No. A218(14)\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C66.26","N/A","HoC/0089","John and Jane Furnival","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tony Rimmer and Tom Selby (Rostons), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Manor Farm, Crewe, CW3 9PS\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C67","Thompson, E A ","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C67.1","N/A","HoC/0076","Miss E A Thompson","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss E A Thompson, assurance 1","2018-06-19","Assurance","Beechwood Farm, Crewe, CW3 9QN","Stafford Borough"]
["C67.2","N/A","HoC/0076","Miss E A Thompson","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss E A Thompson, assurance 2","2018-06-19","Assurance","Beechwood Farm, Crewe, CW3 9QN","Stafford Borough"]
["C67.3","N/A","HoC/0076","Miss E A Thompson","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property, Beechwood, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Beechwood but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss E A Thompson, assurance 3","2018-06-19","Assurance","Beechwood Farm, Crewe, CW3 9QN","Stafford Borough"]
["C67.4","N/A","HoC/0076","Miss E A Thompson","4.1  Provided that–\r\n4.1.1  the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1 \t provides that the Property Beechwood need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2\t restricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3\t provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2  the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss E A Thompson, assurance 4","2018-06-19","Assurance","Beechwood Farm, Crewe, CW3 9QN","Stafford Borough"]
["C67.5","N/A","HoC/0076","Miss E A Thompson","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss E A Thompson, assurance 5","2018-06-19","Assurance","Beechwood Farm, Crewe, CW3 9QN","Stafford Borough"]
["C67.6","N/A","HoC/0076","Miss E A Thompson","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Beechwood but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss E A Thompson, assurance 6","2018-06-19","Assurance","Beechwood Farm, Crewe, CW3 9QN","Stafford Borough"]
["C67.7","N/A","HoC/0076","Miss E A Thompson","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Beechwood the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss E A Thompson, assurance 7","2018-06-19","Assurance","Beechwood Farm, Crewe, CW3 9QN","Stafford Borough"]
["C67.8","N/A","HoC/0076","Miss E A Thompson","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation","Notices of entry and taking possession \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss E A Thompson, assurance 8","2018-06-19","Assurance","Beechwood Farm, Crewe, CW3 9QN","Stafford Borough"]
["C67.9","N/A","HoC/0076","Miss E A Thompson","\r\n3.1. Where the nominated undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over the Blue Land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the nominated undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of ensuring that materially changed land within the Blue Land is not restored following ecological mitigation works to be carried out by the nominated undertaker, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into such an agreement, make a written request to the nominated undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Blue Land.\r\n\r\n3.2. On receipt of a request pursuant to the paragraph above, the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme, he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n\r\n3.3. In reaching a decision pursuant to the above paragraph the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Blue Land” means the land shown for identification purposes only edged blue on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n","Acquisition of Land","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss E A Thompson, assurance 1 in response to request 3","2018-07-13","Assurance","The land shown for identification purposes only edged blue on Plan 1  attached to the letter\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C67.10","N/A","HoC/0076","Miss E A Thompson","4.1. Where reasonably required to mitigate any potential conflict between ecological mitigation planting and drainage arrangements on the Property pursuant to section 5 below, the Secretary of State will not, subject to entry into an agreement under section 4.2, authorise the exercise of the powers of compulsory or temporary acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Red Land for the purposes of the provision of ecological mitigation planting on the Red Land.\r\n\r\n4.2. Section 4.1 is subject to an agreement being entered into between the Secretary of State and the Petitioner prior to the commencement of detailed design of the ecological mitigation planting on the Red Land, for the relocation of some or all of the planting from the Red Land to an alternative site within the Property and subject further to the conditions set out in section 4.4.\r\n\r\n4.3. An agreement entered into pursuant to section 4.2 must be in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State for the purposes of making provision for the creation and maintenance of ecological mitigation planting on an alternative site within the Property and which includes provisions that:-\r\n\r\na) require the Petitioner to provide to the Secretary of State alternative land for ecological mitigation planting within the Property in substitution for that part of the Red Land to be released from being subject to planting, such land being suitable for the proposed planting and not subject to any adverse third party right that may affect the use of that site for ecological mitigation planting;\r\n\r\nb) the agreement securing all necessary rights of access for the nominated undertaker to the alternative site to carry out the ecological mitigation planting on the alternative site and thereafter access the planting pursuant to rights to be conferred under the agreement; and\r\n\r\nc) the proposed change does not require the acquisition of any land outside of the Petitioner’s land ownership.\r\n\r\n4.4. An agreement entered into under section 4.2 is subject to –\r\n\r\na) all necessary consents being obtained from the local planning authority including any consents needed under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n\r\nb) any alternative arrangements for ecological mitigation planting not giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those reported in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill; and\r\n\r\nc) any alternative arrangements for ecological mitigation planting not negatively impacting upon the HS2 project objective of seeking to achieve no net loss in biodiversity.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Property” means the freehold property known as Beechwood, School Lane, Onneley, as shown for identification purposes only, edged red on Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n\r\n“Red Land” means the land coloured red on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n","Relocation of woodland planting from the Red Land","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss E A Thompson, assurance 2 in response to request 4","2018-07-13","Assurance","The land coloured red on Plan 1 attached to the letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C67.11","N/A","HoC/0076","Miss E A Thompson","5.1. The nominated undertaker will identify with the Petitioner existing drainage arrangements on the Property. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the Property and of any existing plans.\r\n\r\n5.2. The location of drains within the Property cut or disturbed by the nominated undertaker’s construction works will be recorded by the nominated undertaker.\r\n\r\n5.3. The nominated undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the Petitioner in respect of the pre- and postdrainage schemes that are required and necessary. The nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n\r\n5.4. Prior to the commencement of significant construction works in the immediate vicinity of the Property, land drains within the Property affected by the Proposed Scheme works will, where reasonably practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the Petitioner which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n\r\n5.5. As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the Petitioner as appropriate by the nominated undertaker.\r\n\r\n5.6. Where natural drainage patterns within the Property are adversely affected by the Proposed Scheme works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered by the nominated undertaker having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the Petitioner.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Property” means the freehold property known as Beechwood, School Lane, Onneley, as shown for identification purposes only, edged red on Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss E A Thompson, assurance 3 in response to request 5","2018-07-13","Assurance","Beechwood, School Lane, Onneley","Stafford Borough"]
["C67.12","N/A","HoC/0076","Miss E A Thompson","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) Tom Selby and Tony Rimmer (Rostons), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Beechwood, School Lane, Onneley","Stafford Borough"]
["C68\t","Williams, Charles and Christina","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C68.1","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Charles and Christina Williams, assurance 1","2018-06-19","Assurance","Baa Hill Farm Produce, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9QE","Cheshire East"]
["C68.2","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Charles and Christina Williams, assurance 2","2018-06-19","Assurance","Baa Hill Farm Produce, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9QE","Cheshire East"]
["C68.3","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","3.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.”\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Charles and Christina Williams, assurance 3","2018-06-19","Assurance","Baa Hill Farm Produce, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9QE","Cheshire East"]
["C68.4","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","2.1. Where the water and/or the electricity supply to the severed area is adversely and directly affected by the construction of the Proposed Works, the nominated undertaker will, if requested by the Petitioner to do so, provide or procure or meet the reasonable cost of the provision of an alternative supply of water and/or electricity where reasonably practicable to do so and if there is no other practicable alternative means of supply available.\r\n2.2. Where the water and/or the electricity supply is so affected temporarily by the construction of the Proposed Works, then the alternative supply need only be supplied for the period during which it is so affected.\r\n2.3. Where a request is made by the Petitioner under paragraph 2.1 for a permanent water and/or electricity supply due to permanent severance of the existing water and/or electricity supply to the severed area caused by the construction of the Proposed Works, the nominated undertaker will where provision of an alternative means of supply can be demonstrated by the Petitioner required for his business, provide or procure or meet the reasonable cost of a permanent means of alternative supply of water and/or electricity.\r\n2.4. Any supply of water and/or electricity to the severed area under any part of this assurance will be subject to its provision by the nominated undertaker in conjunction with the relevant statutory undertaker(s).\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the severed area” means the area identified edged in red on the plan at exhibit A217(6);\r\n“the Proposed Works” means works authorised to be constructed under the Bill.","Water and Electricity Supplied to Severed Land\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Charles and Christina Williams, assurance 1 in response to request 2","2018-07-13","Assurance","The area identified edged in red on the plan at exhibit A217(6)","Cheshire East"]
["C68.5","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","3.1. In exercising the powers conferred under the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours not to prevent vehicular and pedestrian access to the Petitioners’ Farm Shop via Bar Hill Road during the construction of the Proposed Works.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“the Petitioners’ Farm Shop” means the Baa Hill Farm Shop located at Baa Hill Farm as shown on the plan at exhibit A217(9);\r\n","Bar Hill Road\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Charles and Christina Williams, assurance 2 in response to request 3","2018-07-13","Assurance","Baa Hill Farm Produce, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9QE","Cheshire East"]
["C68.6","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","4.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to, if requested by the Petitioner, provide or procure or meet the reasonable cost of the provision of appropriate signage to state wording to the effect of “business as usual” at the Petitioners’ Farm Shop.\r\n4.2. Any signage provision in 4.1 of this assurance will be subject always to any local authority approval.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Petitioners’ Farm Shop” means the Baa Hill Farm Shop located at Baa Hill Farm as shown on the plan at exhibit A217(9);\r\n","Signage\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Charles and Christina Williams, assurance 3 in response to request 4","2018-07-13","Assurance","Baa Hill Farm Produce, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9QE","Cheshire East"]
["C68.7","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","6.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 6.2, to use reasonable endeavours to remove the width of the landscape mitigation planting proposed to be located within the Blue Land, and shown indicatively in blue on Plan 1 and introduce an area of hedgerow habitat creation proposed to be located within the Yellow Land, on Plan 1.\r\n6.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 6.1 are that:\r\n6.2.1. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 6.1 not creating any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n6.2.2. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 6.1 not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n6.2.3. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 6.1 receiving approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n6.3. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the gradient of the landscaped earthworks shown indicatively within the Orange Land on Plan 2 in order that it is more readily available for agricultural use.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“the Yellow Land” means the land coloured yellow on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 87 and 97 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-53 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill. The land has been identified for the introduction of hedgerow habitat creation;\r\n“the Blue Land” means the land coloured blue on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 87 and 97 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-53 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill. The land has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of landscape mitigation to be reduced;\r\n“the Orange Land” means the land coloured orange on Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 87 and 97 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-53 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill. The land has been identified for the inclusion of landscape earthworks;\r\n","Landscape Mitigation and Woodland Mitigation\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Charles and Christina Williams, assurance 4 in response to request 6","2018-07-13","Assurance","The Blue Land shown indicatively in blue on Plan CT-06-233, as attached to the letter, and the Yellow Land shown indicatively in green on Plan CT-06-233 deposited with the Bill.\r\nThe land coloured yellow on Plan 1, as attached to the letter, being part of the land in plot 87 and 97 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-53 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill. \r\n\r\nThe land coloured orange on Plan 2, as attached to the letter, being part of the land in plot 87 and 97 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-53 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill. ","Cheshire East"]
["C68.8","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","7.1. Following the completion of the construction of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will grant to the Petitioner a right to use the Madeley Bridleway 1 Accommodation Green Overbridge.\r\n7.2. The grant of the right of access under paragraph 7.1 shall be subject to the nominated undertaker imposing restrictions on the maximum weight and size of vehicles that may be used over and along the right of access over the Madeley Bridleway 1 Accommodation Green Overbridge.\r\n7.3. Any restrictions imposed under paragraph 7.2 will only be imposed so far as is necessary to ensure the safety and integrity of the operational railway and its infrastructure.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Madeley Bridleway 1 Accommodation Green Overbridge” means the bridge as identified in red on the plan at exhibit A217(10)\r\n","Right to use Madeley Bridleway 1 Accommodation Green Overbridge\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Charles and Christina Williams,  assurance 5 in response to request 7","2018-07-13","Assurance","Madeley Bridleway 1 Accommodation Green Overbridge as identified in red on the plan at exhibit A217(10)","Cheshire East"]
["C68.9","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","8.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to make reasonable provision for the future management of the planting on the Madeley Bridleway 1 Accommodation Green Overbridge as identified in red on the plan in exhibit A217(10).\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n “Madeley Bridleway 1 Accommodation Green Overbridge” means the bridge as identified in red on the plan at exhibit A217(10);","Management of Planting on the Madeley Bridleway 1 Accommodation Green Overbridge\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Charles and Christina Williams, assurance 6 in response to request 8","2018-07-13","Assurance","Madeley Bridleway 1 Accommodation Green Overbridge as identified in red on the plan at exhibit A217(10)","Cheshire East"]
["C68.10","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","9.1. During the detailed design of the works in the areas which include those shown indicatively in the Green Land on the Plan 1, the nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to reduce the land take in these areas.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Green Land” means the land coloured green on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 97 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-53 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill. The land has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of ecological mitigation, and access road;\r\n","Access Roads, Land Take\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Charles and Christina Williams, assurance 7 in response to request 9","2018-07-13","Assurance","The land coloured green on Plan 1, as attached to the letter, being part of the land in plot 97 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-53 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill. ","Cheshire East"]
["C68.11","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","10.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours not to exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Green Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 10.2 below in relation to a reduced area of ecological mitigation being provided.\r\n10.2. The assurance in paragraph 10.1 is subject to:\r\n10.2.1. the nominated undertaker being satisfied that reducing the delivered area of mitigation will not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n10.2.2. the provision of a reduced area of ecological mitigation receiving approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill; and\r\n10.2.3. the nominated undertaker concluding that the change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n10.3. The nominated undertaker will, where reasonably practicable, modify the design of the access road for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the works.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Green Land” means the land coloured green on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter] being part of the land in plot 97 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-53 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill. The land has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of ecological mitigation, and access road;\r\n\r\n“the access road” means the maintenance access road associated with the Drummer Stile Inverted Siphon as shown within the orange circle on the plan at exhibit A217(10);\r\n","Ecological Mitigation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Charles and Christina Williams, assurance 8 in response to request 10 ","2018-07-13","Assurance","The land coloured green on Plan 1, as attached to the letter, being part of the land in plot 97 in the Parish of Colton in the County of Staffordshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-53 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill. \r\n\r\nThe maintenance access road associated with the Drummer Stile Inverted Siphon as shown within the orange circle on the plan at exhibit A217(10)","Cheshire East"]
["C68.12","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","11.1. The Promoter will work with the Petitioners and use reasonable endeavours to mitigate the impact of the construction of the Proposed Scheme upon the Petitioners’ Farm Shop.\r\n11.2. If it is not possible to mitigate the impact of the construction of the Proposed Scheme upon the Petitioners’ Farm Shop, and if the Petitioner is able to demonstrate that the Farm Shop business cannot continue, the Secretary of State will extinguish the business and compensation will be payable in accordance with the compensation code.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Petitioners’ Farm Shop” means the Baa Hill Farm Shop located at Baa Hill Farm as shown on the plan at exhibit A217(9).\r\n","The Farm shop\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Charles and Christina Williams, assurance 9 in response to request 11","2018-07-13","Assurance","Baa Hill Farm Produce, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9QE","Cheshire East"]
["C68.13","N/A","HoC/0077","Charles and Christina Williams","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tom Selby and Tony Rimmer (Rostons), Annex A ","2019-07-09","Assurance","Baa Hill Farm Produce, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9QE","Cheshire East"]
["C69","Beavis, Ivor","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C69.1","N/A","HoC/0087","Ivor Beavis","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Ivor Beavis, assurance 1","2018-06-19","Assurance","Checkley Wood Shoot, The Valve House, Cheshire, SY14 8AW","Cheshire East"]
["C69.2","N/A","HoC/0087","Ivor Beavis","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Ivor Beavis, assurance 2","2018-06-19","Assurance","Checkley Wood Shoot, The Valve House, Cheshire, SY14 8AW","Cheshire East"]
["C69.3","N/A","HoC/0087","Ivor Beavis","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property, Checkley Wood Shoot of the Vale House, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Checkley Wood Shoot of the Vale House but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Ivor Beavis, assurance 3","2018-06-19","Assurance","Checkley Wood Shoot, The Valve House, Cheshire, SY14 8AW","Cheshire East"]
["C69.4","N/A","HoC/0087","Ivor Beavis","4.1 Provided that–\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1\tprovides that the Property Checkley Wood Shoot of the Vale House need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2  restricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3  provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; and\r\n4.1.2  the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Ivor Beavis, assurance 4","2018-06-19","Assurance","Checkley Wood Shoot, The Valve House, Cheshire, SY14 8AW","Cheshire East"]
["C69.5","N/A","HoC/0087","Ivor Beavis","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Ivor Beavis, assurance 5","2018-06-19","Assurance","Checkley Wood Shoot, The Valve House, Cheshire, SY14 8AW","Cheshire East"]
["C69.6","N/A","HoC/0087","Ivor Beavis","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Checkley Wood Shoot of the Vale House but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Ivor Beavis, assurance 6","2018-06-19","Assurance","Checkley Wood Shoot, The Valve House, Cheshire, SY14 8AW","Cheshire East"]
["C69.7","N/A","HoC/0087","Ivor Beavis","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Checkley Wood Shoot of the Vale House the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Ivor Beavis. assurance 7","2018-06-19","Assurance","Checkley Wood Shoot, The Valve House, Cheshire, SY14 8AW","Cheshire East"]
["C69.8","N/A","HoC/0087","Ivor Beavis","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.”\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Ivor Beavis. assurance  8","2018-06-19","Assurance","Checkley Wood Shoot, The Valve House, Cheshire, SY14 8AW","Cheshire East"]
["C69.9","N/A","HoC/0087","Ivor Beavis","1.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to ensure that there is an agricultural liaison service providing individuals experienced in agricultural matters in place and contactable by telephone 24 hours a day, 7 days per week, during the construction of HS2 works on agricultural land.\r\n1.2 The Secretary of State will require that the Nominated Undertaker will:\r\n1.2.1 Provide the name and contact details of the agricultural liaison service provider(s) (and any replacement) to the National Farmers Union (NFU) before he or she takes up his or her post;\r\n1.2.2 Arrange meetings between the agricultural liaison service provider(s) and the NFU on a regular basis, and at least every three months to discuss the activities of the agricultural liaison service provider.","Agricultural liaison service\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tom Selby, (Rostons), assurance 1","2019-04-18","Assurance","Checkley Wood Shoot, The Valve House, Cheshire, SY14 8AW","Cheshire East"]
["C69.10","N/A","HoC/0087 & AP2/0024","Ivor Beavis","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Tom Selby and Tony Rimmer (Rostons), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Checkley Wood Shoot, The Valve House, Cheshire, SY14 8AW","Cheshire East"]
["C70","Brittle, Robert, Richard and Mrs Kay","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C70.1","N/A","HoC/0081","Robert, Richard and Kay Brittle","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Robert, Richard and Mrs Kay Brittle. assurance 1 ","2018-06-18","Assurance","The Coppice, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 5HF","Stafford Borough"]
["C70.2","N/A","HoC/0081","Robert, Richard and Kay Brittle","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2\tShould the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Robert, Richard and Mrs Kay Brittle,  assurance 2 ","2018-06-18","Assurance","The Coppice, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 5HF","Stafford Borough"]
["C70.3","N/A","HoC/0081","Robert, Richard and Kay Brittle","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property The Coppice need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property The Coppice but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Robert, Richard and Mrs Kay Brittle, assurance 3 ","2018-06-18","Assurance","The Coppice, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 5HF","Stafford Borough"]
["C70.4","N/A","HoC/0081","Robert, Richard and Kay Brittle","4.1 Provided that–\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.  provides that the Property The Coppice need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2  restricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.  provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Robert, Richard and Mrs Kay Brittle, assurance 4 ","2018-06-18","Assurance","The Coppice, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 5HF","Stafford Borough"]
["C70.5","N/A","HoC/0081","Robert, Richard and Kay Brittle","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Robert, Richard and Mrs Kay Brittle, assurance 5","2018-06-18","Assurance","The Coppice, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 5HF","Stafford Borough"]
["C70.6","N/A","HoC/0081","Robert, Richard and Kay Brittle","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property The Coppice but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Robert, Richard and Mrs Kay Brittle, assurance 6 ","2018-06-18","Assurance","The Coppice, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 5HF","Stafford Borough"]
["C70.7","N/A","HoC/0081","Robert, Richard and Kay Brittle","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property The Coppice the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Robert, Richard and Mrs Kay Brittle, assurance 7 ","2018-06-18","Assurance","The Coppice, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 5HF","Stafford Borough"]
["C70.8","N/A","HoC/0081","Robert, Richard and Kay Brittle","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2  Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Robert, Richard and Mrs Kay Brittle, assurance 8","2018-06-18","Assurance","The Coppice, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 5HF","Stafford Borough"]
["C70.9","N/A","HoC/0081","Robert, Richard and Kay Brittle","1. The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of permanent compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the plot 36 in the Parish of Whitmore as contained in Schedule 6 of the Bill (“Plot 36”), subject to:\r\n1.1 the successful promotion by the Promoter of Additional Provision 2; and\r\n1.2 the Promoter accessing Plot 36 on a temporary basis either by agreement with the Petitioner or in exercise of the powers to be conferred under Schedule 2 of the Bill for the purpose of carrying out any necessary ground investigations and environmental surveys required in connection with the HS2 Project.\r\n","Compulsory purchase","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Robert, Richard and Mrs Kay Brittle, assurance 1","2019-03-05","Assurance","The Coppice, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 5HF","Stafford Borough"]
["C70.10","N/A","HoC/0081","Robert, Richard and Kay Brittle","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","The Coppice, Newcastle-under-Lyme, ST5 5HF","Stafford Borough"]
["C71","Moore, E W H Partnership","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C71.1","N/A","HoC/0039","E W H Moore Partnership","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-06-18","Assurance","Grange Farm, Crewe, CW3 9DE","Stafford Borough"]
["C71.2","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2\tShould the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-06-18","Assurance","Grange Farm, Crewe, CW3 9DE","Stafford Borough"]
["C71.3","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property, Grange Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Grange Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-06-18","Assurance","Grange Farm, Crewe, CW3 9DE","Stafford Borough"]
["C71.4","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","4.1 Provided that–\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1\tprovides that the Property, Grange Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3\tprovides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2018-06-18","Assurance","Grange Farm, Crewe, CW3 9DE","Stafford Borough"]
["C71.5","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2018-06-18","Assurance","Grange Farm, Crewe, CW3 9DE","Stafford Borough"]
["C71.6","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Grange Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 6","2018-06-18","Assurance","Grange Farm, Crewe, CW3 9DE","Stafford Borough"]
["C71.7","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Grange Farm the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 7","2018-06-18","Assurance","Grange Farm, Crewe, CW3 9DE","Stafford Borough"]
["C71.8","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2  Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 8","2018-06-18","Assurance","Grange Farm, Crewe, CW3 9DE","Stafford Borough"]
["C71.9","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","1.1. The Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with the Petitioner, where a business case is approved and where it relates to the provision of additional farm infrastructure necessary for the Petitioner’s farm business in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Promoter of land required for that business, such agreement to provide that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Promoter being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured.\r\n","Provision of additional farm infrastructure matters\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-06-20","Assurance","Grange Farm, Crewe, CW3 9DE","Stafford Borough"]
["C71.10","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","2.1. The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the provision of additional farm infrastructure required as a result of the impact of the project on the holding where the additional infrastructure is either: \r\n2.1.1. to be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or \r\n2.1.2. the subject of a separate application for planning consent. \r\n2.2. The assistance referred to in paragraph 2.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for the provision of additional farm infrastructure. \r\n2.3. Paragraph 2.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 2.1., a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 2.1. and required to give effect to the provision of additional farm infrastructure, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill. \r\n2.4. Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 2.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper C7: Business Relocation .\r\n","Provision of additional farm infrastructure \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-06-20","Assurance","Grange Farm, Crewe, CW3 9DE","Stafford Borough"]
["C71.11","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to provide that the part of the HS2 access road (as shown on Map CT-06-235, in grids E5, E6 and F5, in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill) from the junction with the realigned Checkley Lane (shown as P7 on Replacement sheet 1-58 of the plans deposited with the Bill) to a field access (shown as point P12 on Replacement sheet 1-58 of the plans deposited with the Bill), to be constructed as part of Work No. 108C, will be of a carriageway width of not less than 5.5m, and suitable for expected agricultural traffic. This assurance is subject to the nominated undertaker securing any necessary approval of the local highway authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill, and subject to engagement with the Petitioner (as owner of the Petitioner’s Property) during detailed design in respect of Work No 108C.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Petitioner” means E W H Moore Partnership c/o Mr Paul Moore, Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe, CW3 9DB\r\n\r\n“Petitioner’s Property” means the landholding of the Petitioner in the Borough of Cheshire East as at the date of this assurance\r\n","Width of access during operation (work No. 108C) off Checkley Lane realignment (Work No.108)","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-07-02","Assurance","HS2 access road (as shown on Map CT-06-235, in grids E5, E6 and F5, in\r\nVolume 2 of the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill) from the junction with the realigned Checkley Lane","Stafford Borough"]
["C71.12","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to use appropriate hoarding to screen the construction of Work Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108 and 108C from the Petitioner’s Property in accordance with Section 5.6 of the draft Code of Construction Practice.\r\n\r\n“Work Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108 and 108C” means those works identified as such in Schedule 1 to the Bill and authorised by the Bill together will all necessary works and conveniences to be authorised to be constructed by the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Petitioner’s Property” means the landholding of the Petitioner in the Borough of Cheshire East as at the date of this assurance\r\n","Construction screening/hoarding","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-07-02","Assurance","Between Work Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108 and 108C and the Petitioner's Property - Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Crewe, CW3 9DB","Stafford Borough"]
["C71.13","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","1.1 Subject to detailed ecology surveys during the detailed design stage, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to accommodate the Petitioner’s proposals to reduce the number of ponds associated with great crested newt habitat creation areas within the Petitioner’s property and increase the distance of great crested newt habitat creation areas from the Petitioner’s commercial poultry sheds, in connection with facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s Property following completion of construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n1.2 The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to:-\r\n\r\n(a) the nominated undertaker being satisfied that the modifications to the great crested newt mitigation does not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement;\r\n\r\n(b) the nominated undertaker being satisfied that the modifications to the great crested newt meet the European Protected Species Licencing Requirements;\r\n\r\n(c) the nominated undertaker securing any and all necessary consents for delivering the great crested newt mitigation;\r\n\r\n(d) the Petitioner’s proposals not contradicting any approval required for the Proposed Scheme under Schedule 17 to the Bill; and\r\n\r\n(e) the nominated undertaker concluding that the modifications to the great crested newt mitigation does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n“Petitioner’s Property” means Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe, CW3 9DB;\r\n\r\n“European Protected Species: Mitigation Licensing” means requirements for licensing activities that affect European Protected Species, under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017.\r\n","Great crested newt habitat creation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company)","2018-07-09","Assurance","Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe, CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C71.14","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","1.1 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 being met and obtaining any necessary consents, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to provide the Access for use by the Petitioner during construction of the Proposed Scheme between Whitmore Heath and Madeley.  \r\n\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are:\r\n\r\n1.2.1 that the  Access can be accommodated within the existing powers of the Bill and does not require any additional land or powers to be conferred on the Promoter other than under the powers currently provided for within the Bill;\r\n\r\n1.2.2 the local highway authority does not object to the construction and operation of the Access;\r\n\r\n1.2.3 any statutory approvals required from the local highway authority, including under Schedule 4 to the Bill can be secured;\r\n\r\n1.2.4 the construction and operation of the Access does not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those reported in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill; and\r\n\r\n1.2.5 the construction of the Access does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n1.3 The exact location of the Access will be determined during detailed design. Following the initial construction of the Access and during construction of the Proposed Scheme, the nominated undertaker may vary the location of the Access in consultation with the Petitioner, subject to satisfaction of the conditions set out in paragraph 1.2.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Access” means vehicular and pedestrian access to the Red Land from the Checkley Lane Temporary Diversion over the illustrative route labelled “proposed accommodation access” on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“Checkley Lane Temporary Diversion” means the temporary road diversion required in connection with the construction of the Proposed Scheme and labelled “proposed accommodation access” on Plan 1;\r\n\r\n“Plan 1” means the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] bearing reference ‘Plan 1’;\r\n","Construction Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-07-10","Assurance","Vehicular and pedestrian access to the Red Land from the Checkley Lane Temporary Diversion over the illustrative route labelled “proposed accommodation access” on Plan 1, as  attached to the letter.\r\n\r\nGrange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe, CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C71.15","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","2.1 The nominated undertaker shall, in accordance with the noise monitoring framework summarised in HS2 Phase 2a Information Paper E12, carry out monitoring during the commissioning of the railway, of operational noise levels from the operational railway from a monitoring location to be located within the Petitioners premises.  \r\n\r\n2.2 The nominated undertaker will share monitoring data with the Petitioner and will engage with the Petitioner in any review of the results of the monitoring undertaken by the Petitioner.\r\n","Noise Monitoring","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-07-10","Assurance","Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe, CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C71.16","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","1. The Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with the Petitioner or any subsequent owner of the Property where:\r\n\r\n1.1 a business case is approved and where it relates to the provision of additional farm infrastructure necessary for the Petitioner’s farm business in consequence of acquisition by the Promoter of land required for that business as a result of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n\r\n1.2 such agreement provides that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Promoter being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured. \r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Property” means Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe CW3 9DB\r\n","Provision of additional farm infrastructure matters","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company)","2018-07-13","Assurance","Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe, CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C71.17","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company) assurance 1","2019-02-15","Assurance","Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe, CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C71.18","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030","E W H Moore Partnership","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2  The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3  The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company) assurance 2","2019-02-15","Assurance","Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe, CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C71.19","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030, AP2/0066","E W H Moore Partnership ","\r\n1. Subject to the conditions in paragraph 2 below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to construct the Hedgerow Planting for the purposes of seeking to provide security and privacy in relation to the Owner’s agricultural business purposes during the operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that the Secretary of State must be satisfied that the provision of the Hedgerow Planting:\r\n\r\n(i) will not result in new or different environmental effects from those reported in the Environmental Statement;\r\n\r\n(ii) will not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n\r\n(iii) will not adversely affect the integrity of the existing mitigation creation required to be provided on the Owners’ Land; \r\n\r\n(iv) will not adversely affect the objective to achieve No Net Loss in Biodiversity; and\r\n\r\n(v) all necessary consents being obtained for the purposes of constructing the Hedgerow Planting, including any approval of the relevant local planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\nEnvironmental Statement means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited at Parliament with the Bill\r\n\r\n\"Hedgerow Planting\"\tmeans the proposed hedgerow planting to be located on the Owner’s Land in the position shown indicatively with a green line and labelled ‘Location of proposed hedgerow’ on the plan at appendix 1 [attached to letter to beneficiary];\r\n\r\n\"No Net Loss in Biodiversity\"\tmeans the objective of the Proposed Scheme to achieve no net loss in biodiversity by, inter alia, planting new woodland to address losses that could not be avoided;\r\n \r\n\"Owners\" means E W H Moore Partnership c/o Mr Paul Moore who are the owners and occupiers of the Owner’s Land;\r\n\r\nOwner’s Land\tmeans Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe as shown indicative edged red on the plan at appendix 2 [attached to letter to beneficiary].\r\n","Hedgerow Planting","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurances 1 to 2","2019-04-15","Assurance","Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe ","Cheshire East"]
["C71.20","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030, AP2/0066","E W H Moore Partnership ","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport\r\n\r\n","Various","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and E W H Moore Partnership","2019-04-25","Undertaking","Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe ","Cheshire East"]
["C71.21","N/A","HoC/0039, AP1/0030, AP2/0066","E W H Moore Partnership ","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Grange Farm, Checkley Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe ","Cheshire East"]
["C72","Moss, J M and S, John Mosley, Susan and Simon and Janet Thompson","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C72.1","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Mos and Mr Simon Moss ","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2  The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1  seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 \tseek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3  In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4  Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 1","2018-06-19","Assurance","Forge Mill Farm, Middlewich, CW10 0HQ","Cheshire East"]
["C72.2","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss","2.1  The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2  Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4  The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.”\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 2","2018-06-19","Assurance","Forge Mill Farm, Middlewich, CW10 0HQ","Cheshire East"]
["C72.3","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property Basford need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Basford but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 3","2018-06-19","Assurance","Forge Mill Farm, Middlewich, CW10 0HQ","Cheshire East"]
["C72.4","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss","4.1 \tProvided that–\r\n4.1.1 \tthe Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1 \tprovides that the Property Basford need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3\tprovides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2 \tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 4","2018-06-19","Assurance","Forge Mill Farm, Middlewich, CW10 0HQ","Cheshire East"]
["C72.5","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss","5.1  Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 16.1 and 17.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 16.1 and 17.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2  On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 18.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3  In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 18.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 5","2018-06-19","Assurance","Forge Mill Farm, Middlewich, CW10 0HQ","Cheshire East"]
["C72.6","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Basford but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 6","2018-06-19","Assurance","Forge Mill Farm, Middlewich, CW10 0HQ","Cheshire East"]
["C72.7","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss","7.1  If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Basford the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 7","2018-06-19","Assurance","Forge Mill Farm, Middlewich, CW10 0HQ","Cheshire East"]
["C72.8","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss","8.1  Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2  Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 8","2018-06-19","Assurance","Forge Mill Farm, Middlewich, CW10 0HQ","Cheshire East"]
["C72.9","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss","9.1  The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n9.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n9.3  The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n9.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n9.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n9.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.”\r\n","Drainage \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 9","2018-06-19","Assurance","Forge Mill Farm, Middlewich, CW10 0HQ","Cheshire East"]
["C72.10","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss","1.    Subject to the incorporation of Additional Provision 2 within the Bill as enacted, for the duration of the construction and existence of the Haul Route a single vehicular / pedestrian access will be provided to allow the Petitioners to access the Field across a section of the Haul Route (to be agreed) (and vice versa), provided that such access shall be subject to any necessary traffic management control; be in accordance with the Code of Construction Practice; and not prejudice the nominated undertaker’s use of the Haul Route. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Haul Route” means a construction route to be constructed on the Pink land and used by the nominated undertaker for the purpose of the Proposed Scheme\r\n","Access\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 1 ","2018-06-25","Assurance","\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nA construction route to be constructed on the Pink land\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C72.11","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss","2. If Additional Provision 2 is not incorporated within the Bill as enacted, following detailed design of the Haul Route and prior to the access route referred to in paragraph 1 above being made available for use by the Petitioners, the Petitioners may provide a Stock Handling Facility within the Field and the reasonable and proper costs of provision of the Stock Handling Facility shall be borne by the nominated undertaker in accordance with the Compensation Code. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Stock Handling Facility” means an open-air handling facility for the safe enclosure of livestock\r\n“Haul Route” means a construction route to be constructed on the Pink land and used by the nominated undertaker for the purpose of the Proposed Scheme\r\n","Stock handling facility\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 2 ","2018-06-25","Assurance","Forge Mill Farm, Middlewich, CW10 0HQ","Cheshire East"]
["C72.12","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss","3. Subject to the successful incorporation of Additional Provision 2 within the Bill as enacted the nominated undertaker will seek to use the Severed Land for the construction of part of the Haul Route and in so doing will, where practicable, reduce the amount of the Field it acquires for the construction of the Haul Route. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\"Severed Land” means the land shown coloured orange on the attached Sheet No, 1.64\r\n“Haul Route” means a construction route to be constructed on the Pink land and used by the nominated undertaker for the purpose of the Proposed Scheme\r\n","Haul route\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 3 ","2018-06-25","Assurance","The land shown coloured orange on the attached Sheet No, 1.64\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C72.13","N/A","HoC/0074","J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss","4.1 The nominated undertaker will identify with the Petitioner existing drainage arrangements within the Field. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable and necessary, of inspections of the Field and of any existing plans.\r\n4.2  The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the nominated undertaker.\r\n4.3 The nominated undertaker will utilise appropriate agricultural drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the Petitioners in respect of the pre-and post-drainage schemes that are required. The nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n4.4 Prior to the commencement of significant construction works in the immediate vicinity of the Field, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the Petitioners which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n4.5   As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the Petitioners as appropriate by the nominated undertaker. \r\n4.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the Petitioner.\r\n4.7  The nominated undertaker shall use reasonable endeavours to provide access (for essential drain maintenance purposes only) to drains within the Pink Land and Severed Land during the nominated undertaker’s use of the Haul Route provided that such access would not have any detrimental effect on or prejudice the nominated undertaker’s use of the Pink Land.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Pink Land” means the land shown coloured pink on the attached Sheet No. 1.64 [attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n“Field” means the land shown coloured green on the attached Sheet No. 1-64 [attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n\"Severed Land” means the land shown coloured orange on the attached Sheet No, 1.64 [attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n“Haul Route” means a construction route to be constructed on the Pink land and used by the nominated undertaker for the purpose of the Proposed Scheme\r\n","Drainage\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J M and S Moss, Mr John Mosley Moss, Mrs Susan Moss and Mr Simon Moss, assurance 4 ","2018-06-25","Assurance","The land shown coloured pink and the land shown coloured green on the attached Sheet No. 1-64, as attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C72.14","N/A","AP2/0018","Mrs Susan Moss and Janet Thompson","1.\tIf AP2 is confirmed by Parliament, and subject to all of the conditions in paragraph 3 being satisfied, following the completion of construction of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to retain the Temporary Access as constructed for the purpose of the Proposed Scheme under AP2 for use by the Owners to access the Owners’ Land.\r\n2.\tFor the avoidance of doubt the nominated undertaker shall not be required to carry out any works either to the Temporary Access or to the Owners’ Land for the purpose of construction of the Permanent Access. \r\n3.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that the Owners enter into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which makes express provision for the terms of the agreement to bind successors in title to the Owners’ Land as to the conditions to be set out in such an agreement to require the Owners to:\r\n3.1\tobtain and provide to the nominated undertaker a written confirmation that the owners of the Access Land and the relevant planning authority, as appropriate, have agreed  that the nominated undertaker shall not be required to restore the Access Land after the Temporary Access has been constructed; \r\n3.2\tobtain planning permission and all relevant consents and approvals from the highway authority for the purpose of constructing the Permanent Access in place of the Temporary Access, such consents and approvals being obtained by the Petitioners no later than six months before the completion of the construction of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n3.3\tconfirm to the nominated undertaker that they acknowledge and agree that:\r\n(i)\tany increase in value of any of the Owners’ Land acquired by the Secretary of State resulting from the retention of the Temporary Access for the purpose of the construction by the Owners of the Permanent Access to the Owners’ Land shall be disregarded by the Secretary of State in assessing any of the Owners’ claims for compensation under the Compensation Code in relation to the Owners’ Land; and \r\n(ii)\tthe value of the Owners’ Land for the purpose of assessing compensation due to the Owners in respect of the compulsory acquisition of any of the Owners’ Land and/or any rights in the Owners’ Land for the purpose of the Proposed Scheme shall be based on the existing lawful use of the Owners’ Land at the date of this Assurance.\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“Owners” means Mrs Susan Moss and Mrs Janet Thompson;\r\n“Owners’ Land” means the land shown edged red on the plan;\r\n“Plan” means the plan attached to this assurance;[plan attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n“Permanent Access” means the bell mouth entrance from B5071 (excluding the Haul Road) to the Owners’ Land to be constructed on the Access Land by the Owners as a means of permanent access to the Owners’ Land in place of the Temporary Access;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; and\r\n“Temporary Access” means the bell mouth entrance from B5071 to be constructed by the nominated undertaker under AP2 on the access land leading to the haul road to be constructed on the Owners’ Land as shown on the plan.\r\n “Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill.\r\n","Temporary Access\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tony Rimmer, (Rostons), assurances 1 to 3\r\n","2019-04-29","Assurance","The Old Vicarage, Narrow Lane, Crewe Green, Crewe, Cheshire. CW1 5UN\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C72.15","N/A","AP2/0018","Mrs Susan Moss and Janet Thompson","4.\tThe Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to consider at the detailed design whether it would be possible to reduce the amount of the Owners’ Land to be acquired for the purpose of the Proposed Scheme subject to the Secretary of State and the nominated undertaker being satisfied that such reduction does not affect the timely, economic and safe delivery of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\nOwners” means Mrs Susan Moss and Mrs Janet Thompson;\r\n“Owners’ Land” means the land shown edged red on the plan; [plan attached to beneficiary letter]\r\nProposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Detailed Design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tony Rimmer, (Rostons), assurance 4\r\n","2019-04-29","Assurance","The Old Vicarage, Narrow Lane, Crewe Green, Crewe, Cheshire. CW1 5UN","Cheshire East"]
["C72.16","N/A","AP2/0018","Mrs Susan Moss and Janet Thompson","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tom Selby and Tony Rimmer, (Rostons), Annex A\r\n","2019-07-09","Assurance","The Old Vicarage, Narrow Lane, Crewe Green, Crewe, Cheshire. CW1 5UN","Cheshire East"]
["C73","Slater, Christopher, Brenda and John","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C73.1","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","1.1  Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 \tseek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2  seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3  In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4  Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 1","2018-06-19","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-under-Lyne, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.2","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","2.1  The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2 \tShould the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4  The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 2","2018-06-19","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-under-Lyne, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.3","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property Snape Hall Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Snape Hall Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 3","2018-06-19","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-under-Lyne, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.4","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","4.1 Provided that–\r\n4.1.1 \tthe Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1 \tprovides that the Property Snape Hall Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3\tprovides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2 \tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 4","2018-06-19","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-under-Lyne, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.5","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","5.1 \tWhere the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2  On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3  In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 5","2018-06-19","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-under-Lyne, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.6","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Snape Hall Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 6","2018-06-19","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-under-Lyne, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.7","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","7.1  If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Snape Hall Farm the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 7","2018-06-19","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-under-Lyne, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.8","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","8.1  Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2  Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 8","2018-06-19","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-under-Lyne, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.9","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","9.1  If prior to the giving of notice of entry or prior to the notice of vesting under a general vesting declaration to acquire land permanently (whether or not before Royal Assent) the Petitioner identifies suitable land for the relocation of an agricultural building (whether within or outside the Petitioner’s ownership) and the Petitioner provides to the Secretary of State a detailed course of action substantiating the relocation, the Secretary of State will confirm whether or not he accepts that the land identified and evidence supporting the course of action provides a reasonable basis for the Petitioner’s claim for compensation in the event that the Bill receives Royal Assent and the Secretary of State exercises his powers of compulsory acquisition. \r\n9.2  In this assurance, “agricultural building” includes a residential building occupied as part of an agricultural building.”\r\n","Identification of land for the relocation of agricultural buildings\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 9","2018-06-19","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-under-Lyne, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.10","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","1, Where existing conduits on the Petitioner’s Property would be severed as a result of the construction of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, prior to the completion of the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, to consult with the Petitioner to seek to provide, where reasonably practicable, replacement conduits necessary for the efficient management of the Petitioner’s Property as a farm enterprise.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“conduits” means the conduits through which pipes, wires and cables through which utilities and other services are carried;\r\n","Conduits under the railway\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 1","2018-06-25","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-under-Lyne, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.11","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","2.1 In carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reconfigure so far as reasonably practicable the balancing ponds by reducing their size and realigning the track leading from Snape Hall Road to the end of the River Lea South Embankment and associated earthworks.\r\n2.2 The assurance in paragraph 2.1 above is subject to the following conditions:\r\n2.1.2 the Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents in order to reconfigure the road;\r\n2.2.2 the necessary approvals of the highway authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill;\r\n2.2.3 the reconfiguration of the road will not result in creating any new or different environmental effects than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and \r\n2.2.4 the reconfiguration of the balancing pond and or the track shall not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“balancing ponds” means balancing pond 1 and balancing pond 2 or any one of them;\r\n“balancing pond 1” means the balancing pond shown in land parcel 148 on Bill plan 1-49 and on the Environmental Statement plan CT-06-231; \r\n“balancing pond 2” means the balancing pond shown in land parcel 134 on Bill plan 1-48 and on the Environmental Statement plan CT- CT-06-231;\r\n","Balancing ponds\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 2","2018-06-25","Assurance","The balancing pond shown in land parcel 148 on Bill plan 1-49 and on the Environmental Statement plan CT-06-231; \r\nThe balancing pond shown in land parcel 134 on Bill plan 1-48 and on the Environmental Statement plan CT- CT-06-231;","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.12","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","3.  Subject to successful promotion of an Additional Provision, detailed design and any approvals of the highway authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to provide a right of access through land parcels 155a and 166 in the Parish of Whitmore, and 4 and 5 in the Parish of Madeley, as shown in Bill plan sheet number 1-49.\r\n\r\n","Access\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 3","2018-06-25","Assurance","Access through land parcels 155a and 166 in the Parish of Whitmore, and 4 and 5 in the Parish of Madeley, as shown in Bill plan sheet number 1-49.\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.13","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","4. Subject to detailed design, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to seek to accommodate so far as reasonably practicable the Petitioner’s reasonable proposals to modify the detailed design of the ecological mitigation on the Petitioner’s Property for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s Property, following completion of the works so far as reasonably practicable and provided that such modification does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n","Trees\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 4","2018-06-25","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-under-Lyne, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.14","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","5.1 Subject to detailed design, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to seek to accommodate so far as reasonably practicable the Petitioner’s reasonable proposals to modify the detailed design of the ancient woodland compensation on the Petitioner’s Property, for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s Property.\r\n5.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 5.1 are that:\r\n5.2.1  that such modification to the planting referred to in paragraph 5.1 not creating any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n5.2.2  that such modification to the planting referred to in paragraph 5.1 not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n5.2.3  that such modification to the planting referred to in paragraph 5.1 receiving approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n","Modification to ancient woodland compensation \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 5","2018-06-25","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-under-Lyne, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.15","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","6.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 6.2, to use reasonable endeavours to remove the width of the landscape mitigation planting proposed to be located within the Blue Land, and shown indicatively in blue on Plan No.1, and introduce an area of hedgerow habitat creation proposed to be located within the Yellow Land, and shown indicatively in yellow on Plan No.1 deposited with the Bill.\r\n6.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 6.1 are that:\r\n2.1.1.\tthe proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 6.1 not creating any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n2.1.2.\tthe proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 6.1 not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n2.1.3.\tthe proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 6.1 receiving approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Blue Land” means the land edged blue on Plan No.1 being part of the land in plot 102 in the Parish of Whitmore in the County of Newcastle-Under-Lyme as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-48 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill. The land has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of landscape mitigation;\r\n“the Yellow Land” means the land edged yellow on Plan No.1 being part of the land in plot 102 in the Parish of Whitmore in the County of Newcastle-Under-Lyme as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-48 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill. The land is identified for the introduction of hedgerow habitat creation.\r\n","Landscape planting \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Brenda and John Slater, assurance 6","2018-06-25","Assurance","the land edged blue and the land edged yellow on Plan No.1, as attached to the letter being part o the land in plot 102 in the Parish of Whitmore in the Country of Newcastle-Under-Lyme as shown on sheet Nos 1-48 of the plans deposited","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.16","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 1","2019-02-15","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.17","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","2.1 The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the relocation of any agricultural buildings displaced for the purposes of the project where the replacement is either:\r\n2.1.1  to be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or\r\n2.1.2  the subject of a separate application for planning consent.\r\n2.2  The assistance referred to in paragraph 2.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for relocation of an agricultural building.\r\n2.3  Paragraph 2.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 2.1. a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 2.1. and required to give effect to the relocation of an agricultural building, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill.\r\n2.4  Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 2.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Information Paper C7, Business Relocation.\r\n2.5  In this assurance, “agricultural building” includes a residential building occupied as part of an agricultural building.\r\n2.6  In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.\r\n\r\n","Relocation of agricultural buildings \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 2","2019-02-15","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.18","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","3.1  The Promoter acknowledges that proper professional costs and fees reasonably incurred by the Petitioner for the purposes of seeking to identify suitable alternative premises at which to relocate an agricultural building which is subject to the power of compulsory acquisition under the Bill, will form a Head of Claim as part of any disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of that land under the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Professional costs and fees \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 3","2019-02-15","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.19","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","4.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n4.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n4.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n4.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n4.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n4.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 4","2019-02-15","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.20","N/A","HoC/0055","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","1. The Promoter will restrict the use of its compulsory purchase powers under the Bill so far as is reasonably practicable over that part of the Petitioner’s Property shaded orange on the Plan subject to, and to the extent that, there is sufficient width on the Access Road for use by HS2 construction vehicles and for HS2’s operational and maintenance use.\r\n2. The Promoter will restrict the use of its compulsory purchase powers under the Bill so far as is reasonably practicable over that part of the Petitioner’s Property shaded blue on the Plan provided that this does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.” \r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“Access Road” means the access road shown indicatively as a dashed red line on the Plan;\r\n “the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Petitioner’s Property” means Snape Hall Farm, Snape Hall Road, Whitmore, Staffordshire, ST5 5HS; \r\n“Plan” means the attached plan (drawing reference C861-ARP-HY-DPL-000-120030);\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.","Reduction in compulsory acquisition\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurances 1 to 2","2019-04-17","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.21","N/A","AP2/0033","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","1.1 \tThe Promoter shall require the nominated undertaker to consult with the Petitioner during the detailed design of the Accommodation Underbridge and consider so far as reasonably practicable the reasonable requirements of the Petitioner when determining the specifications of the Accommodation Underbridge, subject to the conditions referred to in paragraph 1.2 and 1.3.\r\n1.2\tIn respect of the Accommodation Underbridge, \r\n1.2.1\tthe reasonable requirements referred to in paragraph 1.1 means that the Accommodation Underbridge will be sized in accordance with the expected usage requirements of the Petitioner and other authorised users; \r\n1.2.2\tThe dimensions of the Accommodation Underbridge will be at least 4.7 metres wide by 4.14 metres high where the Petitioner’s usage requirements include traversing the crossing by large agricultural vehicles, machinery and implements.\r\n1.2 \tIn considering the Petitioners requirements the Promoter shall be satisfied that the requirements:\r\n1.2.1 \tdo not interfere with reasonable usage of the Accommodation Underbridge by other authorised users; \r\n1.2.2 do not result in any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement;\r\n1.2.3 \tdo not adversely impact on the construction programme of HS2accommodation works or the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.4 \tare within the limits and powers of the Bill, excepting the specification of any other accommodation crossing which may be the subject of a separate agreement between the Petitioners and the Promoter which allows for the relocation of the accommodation crossing for which consents and permissions additional to those provided for in the Bill will be required;\r\n1.2.5 \tdo not in all other respects affect the safe, economic and timely delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Accommodation Underbridge”\tmeans an accommodation bridge to be constructed  under the Bill and referred to as Work 92C of the Authorised Works in Schedule 1 of the Bill; \r\n “Bill”\tmeans the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Environmental Statement”\tmeans the environmental statement including any supplementary environmental statement deposited into Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“Petitioners” means Christopher Slater, Brenda Slater and John Slater;\r\n“Promoter” means the Secretary of State (or any successor Secretary of State or Minister holding the transport portfolio) and includes so far as relevant any nominated undertakers exercising any powers or functions under the Bill once enacted; and\r\n“Proposed Scheme”\tmeans Phase 2a of HS2 as defined in the Bill.\r\n","Crossings specification\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company)","2019-04-23","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.22","N/A","AP2/0033","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","11. In paragraph 73 of the report the Select Committee said:\r\n\r\n“HS2 must ensure that the height of the underbridge is 5.7 metres and the width 4–4.5 metres so as at to allow access for delivery vehicles to the farms.”\r\n\r\n12. The Promoter will incorporate the requested specifications into the detailed design process and continue to engage with the Slater family and other users.\r\n","Detailed design\r\n","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's Third Special Report of Session 2017-2019, paragraphs 11-12\r\n","2019-06-24","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C73.23","N/A","AP2/0033","Christopher, Brenda and John Slater","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A\r\n","2019-07-09","Assurance","Snape Hall Farm, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, ST5 5HS","Stafford Borough"]
["C74","Lord Stafford's Estates, Rt Hon The Lord Stafford, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No.1 Company Ltd, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No. 1 Company Ltd, Trustees of the Swynnerton Settled Estate, Fitzherbert Farms, Hon Benjamin Fitzherbert","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A\t\t\t\t","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C74.1","N/A","HoC/0069","Lord Stafford's Estates, Rt Hon The Lord Stafford, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No.1 Company Ltd, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No. 1 Company Ltd, Trustees of the Swynnerton Settled Estate, Fitzherbert Farms, Hon Benjamin Fitzherbert","1.1 Subject to the conditions at 1.2 and 1.3 below, the nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to reconfigure the areas of land identified for use as mitigation planting and design balancing ponds within the Swynnerton Estate as shown in the July 2017 Environmental Statement, Volume 2: Community Area 3 Stone and Swynnerton map book in order to reduce agricultural land take.\r\n\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in 1.1 are that any reconfiguration of the mitigation planting:\r\ni. does not affect the integrity of required habitat creation and does not negatively impact the Promoter’s objective of seeking to achieve no net loss in biodiversity; and\r\nii. does not affect the visual planting required to mitigate the significant visual effects reported in the Environmental Statement;\r\n\r\n1.3 The conditions referred to in 1.1 are that any reconfiguration of the mitigation planting and balancing ponds:\r\ni. receives the consent of all relevant bodies and authorities\r\nii. the proposals can be accommodated within the existing powers of the Bill;\r\niii. does not affect the Promoter’s compliance with any aspects of the Environmental Minimum Requirements; and\r\niv. does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of HS2 Phase 2a.\r\n","Mitigation planting, design and balancing ponds","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Russell Poole (Swynnerton Estate), assurance 1","2018-06-21","Assurance","Swynnerton Estate, Stone, ST15 0QE","Stafford Borough"]
["C74.2","N/A","HoC/0069","Lord Stafford's Estates, Rt Hon The Lord Stafford, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No.1 Company Ltd, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No. 1 Company Ltd, Trustees of the Swynnerton Settled Estate, Fitzherbert Farms, Hon Benjamin Fitzherbert","2.1. Subject to the successful promotion of an Additional Provision and the conditions in paragraph 2.2 first being met, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to construct the Swynnerton New Bridleway on a revised alignment to the current alignment shown on Plan AP1 CT-05-225. The revised alignment is shown for indicative purposes only by the red line on the accompanying Plan (“Swynnerton New Bridleway alternative - indicative”).\r\n\r\n2.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 2.1 are that:\r\n\r\ni. the Secretary of State is satisfied that the local planning or highway authority with responsibility for the Swynnerton New Bridleway does not have any objections to the construction of the revised alignment of the Swynnerton New Bridleway;\r\n\r\nii. the revised alignment of the Swynnerton New Bridleway does not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those reported in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill; and\r\n\r\niii. the revised alignment of the Swynnerton New Bridleway does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Swynnerton New Bridleway","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Russell Poole (Swynnerton Estate), assurance 2","2018-06-21","Assurance","Swynnerton New Bridleway","Stafford Borough"]
["C74.3","N/A","HoC/0069","Lord Stafford's Estates, Rt Hon The Lord Stafford, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No.1 Company Ltd, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No. 1 Company Ltd, Trustees of the Swynnerton Settled Estate, Fitzherbert Farms, Hon Benjamin Fitzherbert","3.1. Subject to 3.2 below, the Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reduce the width of the screen planting to the East of the cutting by the Tittensor Road diversion, plots 167 and 174 on replacement sheet No. 1-43, as shown indicatively in green on Appendix 1 to a width of approximately 10m. \r\n\r\n3.2 This assurance is subject to the following conditions:\r\ni. the Promoter securing all necessary consents;\r\nii. an alternative suitable area being available to relocate the planting elsewhere if required;\r\niii. the proposed change not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of HS2 Phase 2a; and \r\niv. the proposed change not requiring the acquisition of any land outside of the Petitioner’s land ownership.\r\n","Screen planting","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Russell Poole (Swynnerton Estate), assurance 3","2018-06-21","Assurance","East of the cutting by the Tittensor Road diversion, plots 167 and 174 on replacement sheet No.1-43","Stafford Borough"]
["C74.4","N/A","HoC/0069","Lord Stafford's Estates, Rt Hon The Lord Stafford, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No.1 Company Ltd, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No. 1 Company Ltd, Trustees of the Swynnerton Settled Estate, Fitzherbert Farms, Hon Benjamin Fitzherbert","4.1 Subject to 4.2 below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours provide a means of vehicular access to the field as shown indicatively in blue on Appendix 2 across plot 189 on replacement sheet No. 1-44 from the A51 during operation of the Proposed Scheme. \r\n\r\n4.2 This assurance is subject to the following conditions:\r\n\r\ni. the Promoter securing all necessary consents;\r\nii. any requirements or conditions stipulated by the Local Highway Authority and the nominated undertaker being able to reasonably meet such requirements or conditions;\r\niii. the nominated undertaker being able to satisfy any conditions set out in Schedule 4 to the Bill;\r\niv. the Swynnerton Estate landowner granting any necessary rights of access during construction; \r\nv. the proposal not affecting compliance with any aspect of the Environmental Minimum Requirements;\r\nvi. the proposal not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of HS2 Phase 2a; and\r\nvii. the proposal not requiring the acquisition of any land outside of the Petitioner’s landownership. \r\n","Highway access to fields from A519 or A51","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Russell Poole (Swynnerton Estate), assurance 4","2018-06-21","Assurance","The field as shown indicatively in blue on Appendix 2, attached to the letter, across plot 189 on replacement sheet No. 1-44 from the A51","Stafford Borough"]
["C74.5","N/A","HoC/0069","Lord Stafford's Estates, Rt Hon The Lord Stafford, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No.1 Company Ltd, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No. 1 Company Ltd, Trustees of the Swynnerton Settled Estate, Fitzherbert Farms, Hon Benjamin Fitzherbert","6.1 Provided that: \r\n\r\ni. the Promoter secures all necessary consents; and;\r\nii. Lord Stafford as the landowner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Promoter which provides:\r\n\r\na) that the Petitioner shall provide the land hatched in green on Appendix 3, the plan of which was provided by the Petitioner to the Promoter on 14 December 2017, for ecological mitigation planting; and\r\nb) for the maintenance of the ecological mitigation to be provided on the land,\r\n\r\nthe Promoter shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the land shown edged in blue in Appendix 4.   \r\n","Relocation of woodland habitat","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Russell Poole (Swynnerton Estate), assurance 6","2018-06-21","Assurance","The land hatched in green on Appendix 3 attached to the letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C74.6","N/A","HoC/0069","Lord Stafford's Estates, Rt Hon The Lord Stafford, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No.1 Company Ltd, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No. 1 Company Ltd, Trustees of the Swynnerton Settled Estate, Fitzherbert Farms, Hon Benjamin Fitzherbert","7.1 Subject to 7.2 below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours provide a means of vehicular access to the fields either side of Dog Lane as shown indicatively in blue on Appendix 5 during operation of the Proposed Scheme. \r\n\r\n7.2 This assurance is subject to the following conditions:\r\n\r\ni. the Promoter securing all necessary consents;\r\nii. any requirements or conditions stipulated by the Local Highway Authority and the nominated undertaker being able to reasonably meet such requirements or conditions;\r\niii. the nominated undertaker being able to satisfy any conditions set out in Schedule 4 to the Bill; \r\niv. the proposal not affecting compliance with any aspect of the Environmental Minimum Requirements;\r\nv. the proposal not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of HS2 Phase 2a; and\r\nvi. the proposal not requiring the acquisition of any land outside of the Petitioner’s landownership. \r\n","Highway access to fields either side of Dog Lane","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Russell Poole (Swynnerton Estate), assurance 7","2018-06-21","Assurance","The fields either side of Dog Lane as shown indicatively in blue on Appendix 5 attached to the letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C74.7","N/A","HoC/0069","Lord Stafford's Estates, Rt Hon The Lord Stafford, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No.1 Company Ltd, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No. 1 Company Ltd, Trustees of the Swynnerton Settled Estate, Fitzherbert Farms, Hon Benjamin Fitzherbert","8.2 Further, the Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to enter into an Agreement with the Petitioner which will set out:\r\ni. that the Promoter will return the stopped up area of Bent Lane to the ownership of the Petitioner; and \r\nii. that the Petitioner will grant the Promoter, Network Rail and other bodies (to be confirmed in said Agreement) such vehicular and pedestrian access rights over the stopped up area of Bent Lane as the Promoter requires for Phase 2a purposes. \r\n\r\n8.3 The entering into of any agreement pursuant to 8.2 above is subject to the following conditions:\r\ni. the successful promotion of an Additional Provision to stop up the section of Bent Lane specified in 8.1 above and the exercise of these powers by the Promoter; \r\nii. the Local Highway Authority not objecting to the proposal;\r\niii. any requirements or conditions stipulated by the Local Highway Authority and the Nominated Undertaker being able to reasonably meet such requirements or conditions under the Bill;\r\niv. the Petitioner granting the Promoter, Network Rail and other bodies (to be confirmed in said Agreement) such vehicular and pedestrian access rights over the stopped up area of Bent Lane as the Promoter requires for Phase 2a purposes at no cost to the Promoter; \r\nv. the cost of returning the land to the Petitioner is taken into account in any compensation claim from the Petitioner; and\r\nvi.the position of any gate installed is set back far enough to allow HS2 access vehicles to pull off the highway safely to access the mitigation planting and so as not to impact on the safe use of the highway.\r\n","The stopping up of Bent Lane","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Russell Poole (Swynnerton Estate), assurances 8.2 to 8.3","2018-06-21","Assurance","Bent Lane shown on Appendix 6, as attached to the letter, on replacement sheet 1-46 at the new point marked as P12","Stafford Borough"]
["C74.8","N/A","AP2/0004","Lord Stafford's Estates, Rt Hon The Lord Stafford, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No.1 Company Ltd, Lord Stafford's Estates (Will) No. 1 Company Ltd, Trustees of the Swynnerton Settled Estate, Fitzherbert Farms, Hon Benjamin Fitzherbert","1.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 2 below, during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Promoter shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to construct the Replacement Access Track in place of the Access Track as part of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n2. The conditions in paragraph 1 are that:\r\na. the Replacement Access Track can be constructed within the existing powers and limits of the Bill; \r\nb. Severn Trent Water granting the Promoter (on terms satisfactory to the Promoter) any and all necessary rights and consents to use their access road/land within the Reservoir to enable the Promoter to construct and use the Replacement Access Track; \r\nc. the Replacement Access Track can be constructed without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill; and\r\nd. the Replacement Access Track can be constructed in place of the Access Track without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Access Track” means the part of the access track shown shaded yellow indicatively on Plan A;\r\n“Replacement Access Track” means an alternative access to the Additional Water Treatment Facility within the footprint of the Reservoir as shown indicatively on Plan B;\r\n\r\n“Additional Water Treatment Facility” means the provision of a water treatment facility under the Bill shown indicatively on CT-05-228-R2 and CT-06-228-R2 in CA 3 Stone and Swynnerton in the Supplementary Environmental Statement 2 and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Map Books and labelled AP2-003-015; \r\n\r\n“the Reservoir” means the New Covered Reservoir Under Construction by Severn Trent Water as shown indicatively on CT-05-228-R2 and CT-06-228-R2 in CA 3 Stone and Swynnerton in the Supplementary Environmental Statement 2 and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Map Books.\r\n","Replacement Access Track ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Russell Poole (Swynnerton Estate), assurance 1","2019-04-18","Assurance","Swynnerton Estate","Stafford Borough"]
["C75","Berrisford, J & B and Philip and Janet","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C75.1","N/A","HoC/0145\t\t","J & B Berrisford (Ellesmere Dairy Farm)","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works. \r\n\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2)  to Mr J Cliffe (Wright Marshall Ltd), assurance 1","2018-06-21","Assurance","Ellesmere Dairy, Nantwich, CW5 7NT","Cheshire East"]
["C75.2","N/A","HoC/0145\t\t","J & B Berrisford (Ellesmere Dairy Farm)","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n\r\n- a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n- a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n- a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n- advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n- recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n- advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n- advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n- a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n- a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n\r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr J Cliffe (Wright Marshall Ltd), assurance 2","2018-06-21","Assurance","Ellesmere Dairy, Nantwich, CW5 7NT","Cheshire East"]
["C75.3","N/A","HoC/0151\t\t","J & B Berrisford (Chorlton Dairy Farm)","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works. \r\n\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr J Cliffe (Wright Marshall Ltd), assurance 1","2018-06-21","Assurance","Chorlton Dairy Farm, Chorlton Lane, Crewe, CW2 5NF","Cheshire East"]
["C75.4","N/A","HoC/0151\t\t","J & B Berrisford (Chorlton Dairy Farm)\r\n","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n\r\n- a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n- a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n- a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n- advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n- recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n- advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n- advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n- a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n- a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n\r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr J Cliffe (Wright Marshall Ltd), assurance 2 ","2018-06-21","Assurance","Chorlton Dairy Farm, Chorlton Lane, Crewe, CW2 5NF","Cheshire East"]
["C75.5","N/A","HoC/0145","J & B Berrisford (Ellesmere Dairy Farm)","\r\n1.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the land take for the balancing pond identified in blue shading on Plan 1 accompanying this assurance.\r\n\r\n1.2. The assurance in 1.1 is subject to:\r\n\r\n1.2.1. the Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents required in order to deliver the drainage requirements for the Proposed Scheme at any alternative site; and\r\n\r\n1.2.2. that any alternative site will not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill.\r\n","Reduction in the land take for balancing ponds","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr J Cliffe (Wright Marshall Ltd)","2018-07-09","Assurance","Balancing pond identified in blue shading on Plan 1, attached to the letter, Ellesmere Dairy, Nantwich, CW5 7NT","Cheshire East"]
["C75.6","N/A","HoC/0151","J & B Berrisford (Chorlton Dairy Farm)","1.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the land take for the balancing pond identified in blue shading on Plan 2 accompanying this assurance.\r\n\r\n1.2. The assurance in 1.1 is subject to:\r\n\r\n1.2.1. the Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents required in order to deliver the drainage requirements for the Proposed Scheme at any alternative site; and\r\n\r\n1.2.2. that any alternative site will not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill.\r\n","Reduction in the land take for balancing ponds","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr J Cliffe (Wright Marshall Ltd)","2018-07-09","Assurance","Balancing pond identified in blue shading on Plan 2, attached to the letter, Chorlton Dairy Farm, Chorlton Lane, Crewe, CW2 5NF","Cheshire East"]
["C75.7","N/A","HoC/0151","J & B Berrisford (Chorlton Dairy Farm)","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to provide the Petitioner with a Segregated Access Track prior to the stopping up of the Railway Underpass during the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme for the purposes of facilitating the Petitioner’s access to Chorlton Village.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Railway Underpass” means the underpass adjacent to the proposed Segregated Access as illustrated in orange on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n\r\n“Segregated Access Track” means the proposed access track between Chorlton Dairy Farm to Newcastle Road to the West of the Proposed Scheme as illustrated in pink on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter], suitable for up to 44 tonne vehicles.\r\n","Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr J Cliffe (Wright Marshall Ltd)","2018-07-16","Assurance","The proposed access track between Chorlton Dairy Farm to Newcastle Road to the West of the Proposed Scheme as illustrated in pink on Plan 1, attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C75.8","N/A","AP2/0078","Philip and Janet Berrisford (Ellesmere Dairy Farm)"," 1.1 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.3 first being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours at the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to reduce the geographical extent of the Ellesmere Balancing Pond and associated environmental mitigation planting. \r\n1.2 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.3 first being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours at the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to relocate the Ellesmere Balancing Pond further to the east (shown on Appendix A) within Ellesmere Land already required for the construction of the Proposed Scheme where reasonably practicable.\r\n1.3 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:                                                               \r\n 1.3.1 the construction, operation and maintenance of the modified Balancing Pond can be delivered within the existing Bill powers and limits in accordance with the existing powers of the Bill (as enacted);\r\n 1.3.2 the construction of the modified Balancing Pond would not give rise to any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement; \r\n 1.3.3 the construction, operation and maintenance of the modified Balancing Pond is not likely to prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n “Ellesmere Balancing Pond” means the balancing pond and surrounding habitat creation proposed to be constructed on the Ellesmere Land pursuant to the Bill; \r\n “the Ellesmere Land” means the land shown shaded green on Plan 1 attached to this assurance;  \r\n “the Petitioner” means HS2-AP2: 078 Phillip & Janet Berrisford (Ellesmere Dairy Farm);\r\n","Ellesmere Dairy ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Peter Donald Lewis, Wright Marshall Ltd","2019-04-02","Assurance","Ellesmere Dairy Farm, Cobbs Lane, Wybunbury, Nantwich, CW5 7NT Specifically: the land shown shaded green on Plan 1 attached to this assurance and the balancing pond and surrounding habitat creation proposed to be constructed on the Ellesmere Land pursuant to the Bill.\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C75.9","N/A  ","AP2/0078","Philip and Janet Berrisford (Ellesmere Dairy Farm)","1.\tThe Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to design and construct the balancing pond in the alternative location.\r\n2.\tIn designing the balancing pond in the alternative location the nominated undertaker shall consider so far as reasonably practicable a reduction of land take required for the construction of the balancing pond.\r\n 3.\tThe assurances in paragraphs 1 and 2 above are subject to the Secretary of State being satisfied that the construction of the balancing pond in the alternative location:\r\n(i)\tdoes not result in or create new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the ES;\r\n(ii)\tdoes not affect the safe, economic and timely delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n(iii)\tcan be provided within the existing powers and limits of the Bill and without the need for any additional land.   \r\nIn these assurances:-\r\nalternative location” means an area to the north of the balancing pond as shown coloured blue on plan 1;\r\n“authorised works” means the works to be authorised under the Bill which are shown on the plans deposited with the High Speed Rail (West Midlands- Crewe) Bill and the Additional Provisions;\r\n “balancing pond” means a balancing pond to be constructed on the Petitioners’ Land as part of the authorised works and shown on plan 1;  \r\n“Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“ES” means the environmental statement including any supplementary environmental statement deposited into Parliament with the Bill and/or the Additional Provisions;\r\n“Petitioners” means J & B Berrisford & Son;\r\n“Petitioners’ Land” means the Chorlton Dairy Farm, Chorlton Lane, Chorlton, Crewe CW2 5NF; \r\n“plan 1” and “plan 2”  means the numbered plans attached to this assurance;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Utility Compound” means the utility compound proposed to be constructed on the Utility Land as part of the authorised works;\r\n“Utility Land” means the land edged coloured orange and labelled “Utility compound on Chorlton Dairy Farm” on plan 2.\r\n\r\n","Balancing Pond","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Peter Donald Lewis (Wright Marshall Ltd), assurances 1 to 3","2019-04-16","Assurance","The land edged coloured orange and labelled “Utility compound on Chorlton Dairy Farm” on plan 2 attached to this assurance.\r\n\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C75.10","N/A","AP2/0078","Philip and Janet Berrisford (Ellesmere Dairy Farm)","4.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 4.1 below, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the extent of the land required for the Utility Land where reasonably practicable.   \r\n4.1.\tThe conditions referred to paragraph 4 above are that the Secretary of State shall be satisfied that:\r\n(i)\tthe Utility Compound is  required for the authorised works; and \r\n(ii)\tthe Petitioners shall grant to the nominated undertaker  all necessary rights of access to the reduced  Utility Land for the purpose of constructing and maintaining the Utility Compound; and \r\n(iii)\tthe reduction of the land required for the Utility Compound \r\n-\tdoes not result in or create any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the ES; and in all other respects \r\n-\tdoes not prejudice the timely, safe and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n4.2.\tThe Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioners in respect of the proposed timetable for the construction of the Utility Compound on the Utility Land.”  \r\nIn these assurances:-\r\nalternative location” means an area to the north of the balancing pond as shown coloured blue on plan 1;\r\n“authorised works” means the works to be authorised under the Bill which are shown on the plans deposited with the High Speed Rail (West Midlands- Crewe) Bill and the Additional Provisions;\r\n “balancing pond” means a balancing pond to be constructed on the Petitioners’ Land as part of the authorised works and shown on plan 1;  \r\n“Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“ES” means the environmental statement including any supplementary environmental statement deposited into Parliament with the Bill and/or the Additional Provisions;\r\n“Petitioners” means J & B Berrisford & Son;\r\n“Petitioners’ Land” means the Chorlton Dairy Farm, Chorlton Lane, Chorlton, Crewe CW2 5NF; \r\n“plan 1” and “plan 2”  means the numbered plans attached to this assurance;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Utility Compound” means the utility compound proposed to be constructed on the Utility Land as part of the authorised works;\r\n“Utility Land” means the land edged coloured orange and labelled “Utility compound on Chorlton Dairy Farm” on plan 2.\r\n\r\n","Utility Land","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Peter Donald Lewis (Wright Marshall Ltd), assurance 4","2019-04-16","Assurance","The land edged coloured orange and labelled “Utility compound on Chorlton Dairy Farm” on plan 2 attached to this assurance.\r\n\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C75.11","N/A","AP2/0079","Philip and Janet Berrisford (Chorlton Dairy Farm)","1.\tThe Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to design and construct the balancing pond in the alternative location.\r\n2.\tThe Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to remove the landscape and visual planting and grassland habitat creation shown indicatively on the attached plans in yellow and replace this with Hedgerow Habitat Creation shown indicatively on the attached plans.\r\n3.\tIn designing the balancing pond in the alternative location the nominated undertaker shall consider so far as reasonably practicable a reduction of land take required for the construction of the balancing pond.\r\n\r\n4.   The assurances in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above are subject to the Secretary of State being satisfied that the construction of the balancing pond in the alternative location and Hedgerow Habitat Creation:\r\n(i)    does not result in or create new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the ES;\r\n(ii)    does not affect the safe, economic and timely delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n(iii)    can be provided within the existing powers and limits of the Bill and without the need for any additional land;\r\n(iv)\twould not prejudice the timely, safe and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n(v)     the Hedgerow Habitat Creation can be established, inspected and maintained within the existing limits and powers of the Bill; and\r\n(vi)   the Hedgerow Habitat Creation is approved under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n“Additional Provision(s)” means amendments to the Bill introduced following deposit of the Bill into Parliament;\r\n“alternative location” means an area to the north of the balancing pond as shown coloured blue on plan 1;\r\n“Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n “ES” means the environmental statement including any supplementary environmental statement deposited into Parliament with the Bill and/or the Additional Provisions;\r\n“Hedgerow Habitat Creation” means the proposed hedgerow planting to be constructed on the Petitioner’s Land as part of the authorised works for the purposes of mitigating landscape and visual impacts of the Proposed Scheme and as shown indicatively with green circles on plan 1 and labelled ‘proposed Hedgerow Habitat Creation to replace landscape and visual mitigation planting and grassland habitat creation’;\r\n“Petitioners” means J & B Berrisford & Son;\r\n“Petitioners’ Land” means the Chorlton Dairy Farm, Chorlton Lane, Chorlton, Crewe, CW2 5NF;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Landscape and Visual Mitigation” means the proposed planting to be placed on the Petitioners land as part of the Proposed Scheme for the purpose of landscape and visual mitigation shown indicatively on the attached plans in yellow; and\r\n“Grassland Habitat Creation” mean the proposed grassland habitat creation to be placed on the Petitioners land as part of the Proposed Scheme for the purpose of ecological mitigation associated with the balancing pond shown indicatively on the attached plans in red.\r\n","Balancing Pond","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Peter Donald Lewis (Wright Marshall Ltd), assurances 1 to 4","2019-05-20","Assurance","Chorlton Dairy Farm, Chorlton Lane, Chorlton, Crewe, CW2 5NF\r\n\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C75.12","N/A","AP2/0079","Philip and Janet Berrisford (Chorlton Dairy Farm)","5.   Subject to the conditions in paragraph 5.1 below, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the extent of the land required for the Utility Land where reasonably practicable.   \r\n5.1    The conditions referred to paragraph 5 above are that the Secretary of State shall be satisfied that:\r\n(i)      the Utility Compound is required for the authorised works; and \r\n(ii)      the Petitioners shall grant to the nominated undertaker all necessary rights of access to the reduced Utility Land for the purpose of constructing and maintaining the Utility Compound; and \r\n(iii)     the reduction of the land required for the Utility Compound \r\n-  does not result in or create any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the ES; and in all other respects \r\n-  does not prejudice the timely, safe and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n5.2.  \tThe Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioners in respect of the proposed timetable for the construction of the Utility Compound on the Utility Land. \r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“ES” means the environmental statement including any supplementary environmental statement deposited into Parliament with the Bill and/or the Additional Provisions; \r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Utility Compound” means the utility compound proposed to be constructed on the Utility Land as part of the authorised works;\r\n“Utility Land” means the land coloured orange” on plan 2.\r\n","Utility Land","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Peter Donald Lewis (Wright Marshall Ltd), assurance 5","2019-05-20","Assurance","Chorlton Dairy Farm, Chorlton Lane, Chorlton, Crewe, CW2 5NF\r\n\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C75.13","N/A","AP2/0079","Philip and Janet Berrisford (Chorlton Dairy Farm)","6.  Provided that:\r\n 6.1     the Owner, as owner and occupier of the relevant land, enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State to monitor and maintain the hedgerow habitat which:\r\n 6.1.1  provides that the Hedgerow Habitat Creation must retain its ecological value in accordance with a monitoring and maintenance regime provided by the Secretary of State; and\r\n6.1.2  provides for the maintenance of the Hedgerow Habitat Creation to be provided on the Landscape and Visual Mitigation; and\r\n 6.2     the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Owner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the Hedgerow Habitat Creation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation on the Hedgerow Habitat Creation; \r\n 6.3     there are no legal and/or other impediments to the Owner entering into and thereafter complying with an agreement referred to in paragraph 6.1 above which may prejudice the maintenance of the Hedgerow Habitat Creation;\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the land of the Owner used for the Hedgerow Habitat Creation but instead the nominated undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of that land.”\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“Hedgerow Habitat Creation” means the proposed hedgerow planting to be constructed on the Petitioner’s Land as part of the authorised works for the purposes of mitigating landscape and visual impacts of the Proposed Scheme and as shown indicatively with green circles on plan 1 and labelled ‘proposed Hedgerow Habitat Creation to replace landscape and visual mitigation planting and grassland habitat creation’;\r\n“Owner” means the petitioners, Philip and Janet Berrisford of J & B Berrisford & Son Re: Ellesmere Dairy Farm, Cobbs Lane, Wybunbury, Nantwich, CW5 7NT.\r\n"," Hedgerow Habitat Creation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Peter Donald Lewis (Wright Marshall Ltd), assurance 6","2019-05-20","Assurance","Chorlton Dairy Farm, Chorlton Lane, Chorlton, Crewe, CW2 5NF\r\n\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C76","Barton, Christopher, Wendy and Geoffrey","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C76.1","N/A","HoC/0142","Christopher, Wendy and Geoffrey Barton","The Nominated Undertaker will engage with the owner and occupier of the land with respect to the particular purpose(s) he expects to exercise the powers under clause 14 of the Bill, the type of vehicle(s) to be used, the purpose of the use and the expected frequency and period of use.\r\n","Use of private roads","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Wendy and Geoffrey Barton ","2018-06-21","Assurance","Canalside Farm, Shop and Marina, Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Staffordshire ST18 0RQ","East Staffordshire"]
["C76.2","N/A","HoC/0142","Christopher, Wendy and Geoffrey Barton","1.1 Prior to the use of the Access Track within the Petitioner’s land by HS2 Large Goods Vehicle construction traffic the Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to engage with the Petitioner in order to develop appropriate site specific traffic management measures to seek to reduce, as far as reasonably practicable, disruption to the Petitioner’s operations. \r\n1.2 Traffic management measures in paragraph 1.1 will seek to reduce the use of the Access Track by HS2 Large Goods Vehicles at weekends and bank holidays in order to reduce, as far as reasonably practicable, disruption to the Petitioner’s operations. “the Access Track” means the road to be used in relation to the construction and maintenance of the Proposed Scheme as shown on Plan [1] highlighted in blue attached to this assurance;\r\n1.3 The Promoter will require that the Access Track is only used by HS2 Large Good Vehicles during the construction of the Proposed Scheme and only for the purposes of constructing the Haul Road - “the Haul Road” means the road shown on the attached Plan 1 highlighted in yellow;\" (and the subsequent reinstatement) except:\r\n1.3.1 in circumstances where it is required to do so by the relevant planning authority under the powers conferred on it by paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill, or\r\n1.3.2 in the case of an emergency or if directed to do so by the police or emergency services, or\r\n1.3.3 where, it would prejudice the safe, timely and economic construction and/or operation of the Proposed Scheme.”","Construction access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Christopher, Wendy and Geoffrey Barton ","2018-06-25","Assurance","Canalside Farm, Shop and Marina, Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Staffordshire ST18 0RQ","East Staffordshire"]
["C76.3","N/A","HoC/0142","Christopher, Wendy and Geoffrey Barton","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 1","2019-02-14","Assurance","Canalside Farm, Shop and Marina, Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Staffordshire ST18 0RQ","East Staffordshire"]
["C76.4","N/A","HoC/0142","Christopher, Wendy and Geoffrey Barton","2.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n2.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n2.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 2","2019-02-14","Assurance","Canalside Farm, Shop and Marina, Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Staffordshire ST18 0RQ","East Staffordshire"]
["C76.5","N/A","HoC/0142","Christopher, Wendy and Geoffrey Barton","3.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n3.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n3.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n3.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 3","2019-02-14","Assurance","Canalside Farm, Shop and Marina, Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Staffordshire ST18 0RQ","East Staffordshire"]
["C76.6","N/A","HoC/0142","Christopher, Wendy and Geoffrey Barton","4.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of  State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n4.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 4.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n4.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n4.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n4.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n4.4  Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 4","2019-02-14","Assurance","Canalside Farm, Shop and Marina, Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Staffordshire ST18 0RQ","East Staffordshire"]
["C76.7","N/A","HoC/0142","Christopher, Wendy and Geoffrey Barton","5.1  The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n•\ta pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n•\ta target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n•\ta method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n•\tadvice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n•\trecommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n•\tadvice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n•\tadvice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n•\ta schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 5.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n•\ta final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n5.2  Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 5.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n5.3  The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n5.4  The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson assurance 5","2019-02-14","Assurance","Canalside Farm, Shop and Marina, Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Staffordshire ST18 0RQ","East Staffordshire"]
["C76.8","N/A","HoC/0142","Christopher, Wendy and Geoffrey Barton","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company, Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Canalside Farm, Shop and Marina, Mill Lane, Great Haywood, Staffordshire ST18 0RQ","East Staffordshire"]
["C77","Tabernor, Trevor, Jean, Alan and Jeffrey","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C77.1","N/A","HoC/0179, AP1/0019","Trevor, Jean, Alan and Jeffrey Tabernor","1.1 Subject to the successful promotion of an Additional Provision and the satisfaction of the conditions set out in 1.2 below, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to construct the Proposed Alignment in substitution for the route alignment identified as Option A4.3b. \r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in 1.1 above are that the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Proposed Alignment is not subject to any objection from the local planning and highway authority; and the construction of the Proposed Alignment does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme. \r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“the Proposed Alignment” means a route alignment generally in conformity with Option 4.0 save in respect of the final location of a permanent auto-transformer station which shall be established by the nominated undertaker through detailed design work;\r\n\"Option A4.0\" means the section of the HS2 railway alignment described in paragraph 2.5.7 of Environmental Statement Volume 2 of CA2: Colwich to Yarlet;\r\n“Option A4.3b” means the section of HS2 railway alignment described in paragraph 2.5.7 of Environmental Statement Volume 2 of CA2: Colwich to Yarlet;\r\n","Route alignment","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Trevor, Jean, Alan Jeffrey Tabernor, assurance 1","2018-06-26","Assurance","The section of the HS2 railway alignment described in paragraph 2.5.7 of Environmental Statement Volume 2 of CA2: Colwich to Yarlet","Stafford Borough"]
["C77.2","N/A","HoC/0179, AP1/0019","Trevor, Jean, Alan and Jeffrey Tabernor","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Trevor, Jean, Alan Jeffrey Tabernor, assurance 1","2018-06-21","Assurance","Land parcel 3495","Stafford Borough"]
["C77.3","N/A","HoC/0179,  AP1/0019","Trevor, Jean, Alan and Jeffrey Tabernor","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:- \r\n· a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n· a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n · a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n· advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n· recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n· advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n· advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n· a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n· a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Trevor, Jean, Alan Jeffrey Tabernor, assurance 2","2018-06-21","Assurance","Land parcel 3495","Stafford Borough"]
["C78","Ralls, Keith and Gillian","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C78.1","N/A","HoC/0111, AP1/0006","Keith and Gillian Ralls","The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker in constructing the Proposed Scheme at the Property to use reasonable endeavours to minimise any interference with the operation of the drainage system.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“drainage system” means the pond, ditch and associated drainage channels at the Property; \r\n“the Property” means Long Compton Farm registered at the Land Registry under Title Number SF450192.\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Keith and Gillian Ralls, assurance 1","2018-06-25","Assurance","Long Compton Farm, Sandyford, Stone, Staffordshire ST15 0QB","East Staffordshire"]
["C78.2","N/A","HoC/0111,  AP1/0006","Keith and Gillian Ralls","Subject to the Nominated Undertaker’s assessment of the ecological condition of the hedgerow between A51 Stone Road to the end of the Petitioner’s Property shown marked in red on the Plan (“the hedgerow”), and subject to approval by the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker not to remove and replace the hedgerow and instead to enhance the hedgerow along the existing field boundary to provide connectivity to the woodland and ponds as shown marked red on the Plan. \r\n","Hedgerow","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Keith and Gillian Ralls, assurance 2","2018-06-25","Assurance","The hedgerow between A51 Stone Road to the end of Long Compton Farm, Sandyford, Stone, Staffordshire ST15 0QB as marked in red on the Plan attached to the letter","East Staffordshire"]
["C78.3","N/A","HoC/0111, AP1/0006","Keith and Gillian Ralls","If private services to the Property are temporarily interfered with by the construction works for the Proposed Scheme, alternative services will be provided where reasonably practicable during that period of interference.  These may include the provision of a new, or amendment to an existing, private water supply or electricity supply to the Property subject to any requirements of the relevant statutory undertaker or service provider.”\r\n","Private utilities\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Keith and Gillian Ralls, assurance 3","2018-06-25","Assurance","Long Compton Farm, Sandyford, Stone, Staffordshire ST15 0QB","East Staffordshire"]
["C78.4","N/A","AP2/0014","Keith and Gillian Ralls","1.\tSubject to the conditions set out in paragraph 2 below being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to relocate the Roundabout further to the north and/or west of its current position (“the Revised Location”).\r\n 2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1 above are: \r\n(a)\tthe Promoter obtaining any additional land interests required for the delivery of the Roundabout at the Revised Location before the construction of the A51 Stone Road diversion, subject to it being made available on reasonable terms (but nothing in this assurance shall require the Promoter to promote an Additional Provision to obtain such land interests);\r\n(b)\tthe Promoter obtaining any necessary permissions, consents and approvals from the local planning authority and local highway authority required to deliver the Roundabout at the Revised Location on reasonably implementable terms without any Unacceptable Conditions before the construction of the A51 Stone Road diversion;\r\n(c)\tthe local highway authority agreeing to adopt and maintain the Roundabout at the Revised Location in perpetuity;\r\n(d)\tthe Promoter being satisfied that the relocation of the Roundabout to the Revised Location can be accommodated within the programme for the Proposed Scheme; \r\n(e)\tthe Promoter being satisfied that the relocation of the Roundabout to the Revised Location would not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and \r\n(f)\tthe Promoter being satisfied that the relocation of the Roundabout to the Revised Location would not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“Environmental Statement” means the Environmental Statement including any supplementary environmental statement deposited into Parliament with the Bill\r\n“A51 Stone Road  diversion” means the diversion of the A51 Stone Road from a junction near the existing Tittensor Road to the A519 Newcastle Road\r\n“the Roundabout ” means the roundabout on the A51 Stone Road diversion and Tittensor Road diversion proposed as part of Additional Provision 2 as shown on the Plan \r\n“the Plan”\tmeans plan CT-06-225 in the CA3 Stone and Swynnerton Map Book in Volume 2 of the Supplementary Environmental Statement and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement \r\n “Unacceptable Conditions”\tmeans a condition imposed on any permission, consent or approval which could adversely impact the delivery of the Proposed Scheme including any conditions which could cause the Secretary of State to incur additional cost, would cause delay to the Proposed Scheme or are outside the scope of highways approvals under Schedules 4 and 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Relocation of roundabout\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Keith and Gillian Ralls, assurances 1 to 2","2019-05-02","Assurance","Junction of A51 Stone Road diversion and Tittensor Road diversion","East Staffordshire"]
["C79","Pearce, David","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C79.1","N/A","HoC/0013","David Pearce","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2  The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 \tseek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3  In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4  Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Pearce, assurance 1","2018-06-21","Assurance","Shelton-under-Harley Farm,Whitmore,  Newcastle-under-lyme, ST5 4EJ","Stafford Borough"]
["C79.2","N/A","HoC/0013","David Pearce","2.1  The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2  Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4  The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Pearce, assurance 2","2018-06-21","Assurance","Shelton-under-Harley Farm,Whitmore,  Newcastle-under-lyme, ST5 4EJ","Stafford Borough"]
["C79.3","N/A","HoC/0013","David Pearce","3.1  Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n3.2  Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n3.3  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Pearce, assurance 3","2018-06-21","Assurance","Shelton-under-Harley Farm,Whitmore,  Newcastle-under-lyme, ST5 4EJ","Stafford Borough"]
["C79.4","N/A","HoC/0013","David Pearce","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Pearce, assurance 1","2019-03-05","Assurance","Shelton-under-Harley Farm,Whitmore,  Newcastle-under-lyme, ST5 4EJ","Stafford Borough"]
["C79.5","N/A","HoC/0013","David Pearce","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Pearce, assurance 2","2019-03-05","Assurance","Shelton-under-Harley Farm,Whitmore,  Newcastle-under-lyme, ST5 4EJ","Stafford Borough"]
["C79.6","N/A","HoC/0013","David Pearce","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Shelton-under-Harley Farm,Whitmore,  Newcastle-under-lyme, ST5 4EJ","Stafford Borough"]
["C80","Dyke, George, Helen, Sarah","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C80.1","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2  The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2  seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3  In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4  Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George, Helen and Sarah Dyke, assurance 1","2018-06-21","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.2","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","2.1 \tThe Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n\r\n2.2  Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4  The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.”\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George, Helen and Sarah Dyke, assurance 2","2018-06-21","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.3","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property Hatton Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Hatton Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George, Helen and Sarah Dyke, assurance 3","2018-06-21","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.4","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","4.1  Provided that–\r\n4.1.1  the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1 \tprovides that the Property Hatton Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2  restricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3  provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2  the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George, Helen and Sarah Dyke, assurance 4","2018-06-21","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.5","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","5.1  Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2  On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3  In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George, Helen and Sarah Dyke, assurance 5","2018-06-21","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.6","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Hatton Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George, Helen and Sarah Dyke, assurance 6","2018-06-21","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.7","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Hatton Farm the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George, Helen and Sarah Dyke, assurance 7","2018-06-21","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.8","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","8.1 \tNotwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2 \tNotwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3 \tFollowing the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.”\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to George, Helen and Sarah Dyke, assurance 8","2018-06-21","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.9","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","1.1 During the construction period of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to reduce so far as is reasonably practicable, the use of Common Lane (Swynnerton) between the A51 and point marked “X” (shown in Plan 1 attached) by HS2 construction traffic (illustrated in blue on Plan 1 attached).\r\n","Common Lane (Swynnerton) - construction vehicles\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-06-28","Assurance","Common Lane (Swynnerton) between the A51 and point marked “X” shown in Plan 1 attached to the letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.10","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours not to exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Green Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 2.2 below in relation to a reduced area of ecological mitigation being provided.\r\n2.2 The assurance in paragraph 2.1 is subject to:\r\n2.2.1 the nominated undertaker being satisfied that reducing the delivered area of mitigation will not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n2.2.2 the provision of a reduced area of ecological mitigation receiving approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill; and\r\n2.2.3 the nominated undertaker concluding that the change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n2.3 The nominated undertaker will where reasonably practicable modify the design of the balancing pond and access road for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the Works.\r\n\r\n","Balancing pond – reduction of ecological mitigation\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-06-28","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.11","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","3.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to complete the detailed design of the Swynnerton Footpath 52 Accommodation Underbridge, so as to provide a minimum vertical clearance of 5.7 metres by a minimum horizontal clearance of 5.5 metres, from the surface of the track beneath the underbridge and the underside of the underbridge.\r\n\r\n","Swynnerton Footpath 52 accommodation underbridge\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-06-28","Assurance","Swynnerton Footpath 52 Accommodation Underbridge","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.12","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","4.1 During construction of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, where so far as reasonably practicable, not to prevent the Petitioner’s access on, across and along Common Lane (Swynnerton) within Bill limits, subject to any required consents being granted by the Local Planning Authority and Highways Authority and any other relevant third party consents.\r\n\r\n","Access: Common Lane (Swynnerton)\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2018-06-28","Assurance","Access on, across and along Common Lane (Swynnerton)","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.13","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","\r\n1.1 Following the completion of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to provide the Petitioner with access for agricultural vehicles between Swynnerton Footpath 52 Accommodation Underbridge and Swynnerton Footpath 15 Green Overbridge within Bill limits as illustrated on the attached CT-06-227 plan for the purposes of facilitating the Petitioner’s access, where reasonably practicable and subject to the conditions set out in 1.2 below. \r\n \r\n1.2  The provision of the agricultural vehicle access shall be subject to:\r\n \r\n1.2.1  the provision of the access not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme\r\n\r\n1.2.2  the access being provided on land within existing Bill limits;\r\n\r\n1.2.3 the access being capable of being provided either (a) within the existing powers of the Bill and not creating any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill or (b) through the successful promotion of an Additional Provision and/or a Supplementary Environmental Statement which confers on the Secretary of State powers to provide the access and the inclusion in the Supplementary Environmental Statement of an assessment of the significant environmental effects of the proposed access.\r\n","Access for agricultural vehicles between the Swynnerton Footpath 52 Accommodation Underbridge and Swynnerton Footpath 15 Green Overbridge","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company)","2018-07-04","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.14","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","\r\n1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2019-03-05","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.15","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-03-05","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C80.16","N/A","HoC/0017","George, Helen and Sarah Dyke","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Hatton Mill Farm, Hatton, Stafford, ST21 6SH","Stafford Borough"]
["C81","Nield, Edward","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C81.1","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-06-21","Assurance","Chells Hill Farm, CW11 2TJ\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C81.2","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","2.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property, parcel of land located off Bar Hill Road, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, parcel of land located off Bar Hill Road, but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n2.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company),  assurance 2","2018-06-21","Assurance","Chells Hill Farm, CW11 2TJ\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C81.3","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","3.1 \tProvided that–\r\n3.1.1 \tthe Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n3.1.1.1 \tprovides that the Property, parcel of land located off Bar Hill Road, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n3.1.1.2\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n3.1.1.3\tprovides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n3.1.2 \tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2 \tIn this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-06-21","Assurance","Chells Hill Farm, CW11 2TJ\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C81.4","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","4.1  Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 2.1 and 3.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 2.1 and 3.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n4.2  On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 4.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n4.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 4.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n4.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2018-06-21","Assurance","Chells Hill Farm, CW11 2TJ\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C81.5","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","5.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, parcel of land located off Bar Hill Road, but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2018-06-21","Assurance","Chells Hill Farm, CW11 2TJ\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C81.6","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","6.1 \tIf at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property, parcel of land located off Bar Hill Road, the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 6","2018-06-21","Assurance","Chells Hill Farm, CW11 2TJ\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C81.7","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","7.1  Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n7.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n7.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 7","2018-06-21","Assurance","Chells Hill Farm, CW11 2TJ\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C81.8","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","1.  The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to reduce the area of landscape mitigation planting by excluding the use of the Blue Land as shown on the attached plan for that purpose in the interests of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n \r\n2.  This assurance is subject to the condition that the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1:\r\n \r\n(i)  does not create in any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n \r\n(ii) does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n \r\n(iii)  receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Blue Land” means the land shown edged blue on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter].\r\n","Reducing the area of landscape mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company)","2018-07-03","Assurance","Chells Hill Farm, CW11 2TJ","Cheshire East"]
["C81.9","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2019-02-27","Assurance","Chells Hill Farm, CW11 2TJ","Cheshire East"]
["C81.10","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-02-27","Assurance","Chells Hill Farm, CW11 2TJ","Cheshire East"]
["C81.11","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","3.1 \tThe Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n•\ta pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n•\ta target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n•\ta method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n•\tadvice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n•\trecommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n•\tadvice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n•\tadvice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n•\ta schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 3.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n•\ta final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n3.2 \tShould the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 3.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n3.3 \tThe reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n3.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2019-02-27","Assurance","Chells Hill Farm, CW11 2TJ","Cheshire East"]
["C81.12","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Chells Hill Farm, CW11 2TJ","Cheshire East"]
["C81.13","N/A","HoC/0026","Edward Nield","In this assurance, subject to various conditions, the Secretary of State agrees to the following:\r\n 1.  The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to reduce the area of landscape mitigation planting by excluding the use of the Red Land as shown on the attached plan and shall not acquire the Red Land permanently for any purpose under the powers of the Bill.\r\n 2.  This assurance is subject to the condition that the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1 as a result of not acquiring the Red Land:\r\n (i)  does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement;\r\n (ii) does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n (iii)  receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n“In this assurance:\r\n “Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement, prepared for the Proposed Scheme, including any supplementary environmental statement deposited into the House of Commons with the Bill and/or the additional provisions; \r\n“the nominated undertaker” refers to the body or bodies appointed by the Secretary of State to exercise the powers conferred by the Bill to construct and maintain the Proposed Scheme. The nominated undertaker may be HS2 Ltd, or it may be another body or bodies appointed to oversee the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Mr Edward Nield;\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n “the Red Land” means the land shown coloured red on the attached plan\r\n","Landscape mitigation\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight  (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1 to 2 ","2020-06-30","Assurance","“the Red Land” means the land shown coloured red on the attached plan","Cheshire East"]
["C82","Paris, Gillan and Suzan","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C82.1","N/A","HoC/0132","Gillan John Paris and Suzan Violet Paris","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2  The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1  seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed Design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Gillan John Paris and Suzan Violet Paris, assurance 1","2018-06-21","Assurance","No. 2 Keepers Cottage, Hoo Mill Lane, Ingestre Stafford\r\nLand ST18 0RG and Stables Adjacent to Lion Lodge Ingestre, Stafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C83","Tavernor, Mr and Mrs J","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C83.1","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs J Tavernor, assurance 1","2018-06-21","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.2","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs J Tavernor, assurance 2","2018-06-21","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.3","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property Farley Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Farley Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs J Tavernor, assurance 3","2018-06-21","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.4","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","4.1 Provided that–\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1 provides that the Property Farley Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2 restricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3 provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs J Tavernor, assurance 4","2018-06-21","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.5","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance."," Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs J Tavernor, assurance 5","2018-06-21","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.6","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Farley Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs J Tavernor, assurance 6","2018-06-21","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.7","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Farley Farm the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs J Tavernor, assurance 7","2018-06-21","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.8","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs J Tavernor, assurance 8","2018-06-21","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.9","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","On completion of the Works the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to remove the proposed temporary roundabout at Tolldish Lane as illustrated on Sheet Nos. 1-24 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill, subject to any and all consents being granted by the Local Planning Authority and Highways Authority in accordance with Schedule 4 and 17 of the Bill.\r\n","Roundabout at Tolldish Lane","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs J Tavernor ","2018-06-21","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.10","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","1.1 The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to realign at detailed design stage that part of Tolldish Lane diversion (Work No 36A) that falls within plots 154 and 156 as shown on plan Replacement Sheet No 1-24 as close to the Trent South embankment (Work No 17) as reasonably practicable and safe subject to the following conditions:\r\n1.2.1\tthe Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents in order to reconfigure the road;\r\n1.2.2\tthe necessary approvals of the highway authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill;\r\n1.2.3\tthe reconfiguration of the road will not result in creating any new or different environmental effects than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and \r\n1.2.4\tthe reconfiguration of the road shall not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme","Tolldish Lane diversion","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs J Tavernor, assurance 1","2018-06-25","Assurance","Tolldish Lane diversion (Work No 36A) that falls within plots 154 and 156 as shown on plan Replacement Sheet No 1-24 as close to the Trent South embankment (Work No 17)","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.11","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","Following completion of the works and reinstatement of the Petitioner’s Property boundary the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker, so far as reasonably practicable, to provide access from Plot 174 to Plot 177 on the Petitioner’s Property as shown on the attached Replacement Sheet No 1-23, subject to approvals of the highway authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","2018-06-26","Assurance","Access from Plot 174 to Plot 177 on the Petitioner’s Property as shown on the attached Replacement Sheet No 1-23 \r\nFarley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.12","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","On completion of the Works, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to remove the proposed temporary Tolldish Lane diversion as illustrated on Replacement Sheet No. 1-24 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill, subject to any and all consents being granted by the Local Planning Authority and Highways Authority in accordance with Schedules 4 and 17 of the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Works” includes all and any works (including preparatory works) for construction of the Proposed Scheme.","Tolldish Lane diversion","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","2018-07-17","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.13","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 1","2019-02-14","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.14","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","2.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 2","2019-02-14","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C83.15","N/A","HoC/0060","Mr and Mrs J Tavernor","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Farley Farm, Stafford, ST18 0UD","Stafford Borough"]
["C84","Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased), The","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C84.1","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to the executors of J S Sampson (Deceased), assurance 1","2018-06-21","Assurance","Manor Farm, Congleton, CW12 2PG","Cheshire East"]
["C84.2","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to the executors of J S Sampson (Deceased), assurance 2","2018-06-21","Assurance","Manor Farm, Congleton, CW12 2PG","Cheshire East"]
["C84.3","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property, Land south of Hopton village, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Land south of Hopton Village but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to the executors of J S Sampson (Deceased), assurance 3","2018-06-21","Assurance","Manor Farm, Congleton, CW12 2PG","Cheshire East"]
["C84.4","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","4.1 Provided that–\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n4.1.1.1  provides that the Property Land south of Hopton Village need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n4.1.1.2  restricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n4.1.1.3  provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n4.1.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having  regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to the executors of J S Sampson (Deceased), assurance 4","2018-06-21","Assurance","Manor Farm, Congleton, CW12 2PG","Cheshire East"]
["C84.5","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to the executors of J S Sampson (Deceased), assurance 5","2018-06-21","Assurance","Manor Farm, Congleton, CW12 2PG","Cheshire East"]
["C84.6","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, Land south of Hopton village, but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to the executors of J S Sampson (Deceased), assurance 6","2018-06-21","Assurance","Manor Farm, Congleton, CW12 2PG","Cheshire East"]
["C84.7","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Land south of Hopton Village the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to the executors of J S Sampson (Deceased), assurance 7","2018-06-21","Assurance","The Property Land south of Hopton Village\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C84.8","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to the executors of J S Sampson (Deceased), assurance 8","2018-06-21","Assurance","Manor Farm, Congleton, CW12 2PG","Cheshire East"]
["C84.9","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","\r\n1.1 In carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme the Promoter shall, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reconfigure so far as reasonably practicable the ecological mitigation proposed for the Ecological Mitigation Land to reduce the amount of the Ecological Mitigation Land required for such mitigation.\r\n\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n\r\na) the proposed reconfiguration referred to in paragraph 1.1 does not create any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill; \r\nb) the proposed reconfiguration referred to in paragraph 1.1 does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and \r\nc) the proposed reconfiguration referred to in paragraph 1.1 receives any necessary approval from the local planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Ecological Mitigation Land” means the area of proposed grassland habitat creation shown in grid squares E5 and F5 on Plan CT-06-216 in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill and shown edged in red on the attached plan;","Ecological Mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company)","2018-07-02","Assurance","The area of proposed grassland habitat creation shown in grid squares E5 and F5 on Plan CT-06-216 in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill and shown edged in red on the plan attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C84.10","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","1.1 Subject to the condition in paragraph 1.2, the Secretary of State, in exercising the powers of the Bill, will grant to the Petitioner a right of way with or without vehicles, post-construction of the Proposed Scheme, over the Access Road for the purpose of enabling the Petitioner to access the Petitioner’s Land from Hopton Lane.\r\n\r\n1.2 This assurance is subject to the Petitioner being the freehold owner of the Petitioner’s Land at the date of the completion of the Mitigation Works or Work No. 53A (whichever is the later).\r\n\r\n“Petitioner’s Land” means that parcel of land owned by the Petitioner as shown edged in purple on the attached plan and identified on Map CT-06-216 in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill for woodland and grassland habitat creation; \r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Access Road” means that part of the access road from Hopton Lane comprised in Work No. 53A between points A and B on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter]; \r\n\r\n“Work No. 53A” means the work identified as Work No. 53A in Schedule 1 to the Bill together with all necessary works and conveniences to be authorised to be constructed by the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Right of Way - post construction\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company)","2018-07-03","Assurance","That part of the access road from Hopton Lane comprised in Work No. 53A between points A and B on the plan,  attached to the letter\r\n\r\nThe parcel of land owned by the Petitioner as shown edged in purple on the plan, as attached to the letter, and identified on Map CT-06-216 in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement \r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C84.11","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.","Provision of information \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2019-02-14","Assurance","Manor Farm, Congleton, CW12 2PG\r\n\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C84.12","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","2.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Drainage \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-02-14","Assurance","Manor Farm, Congleton, CW12 2PG\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C84.13","N/A","HoC/0015","The Executors of J S Sampson (Deceased)","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Manor Farm, Congleton, CW12 2PG\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C85","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club Limited","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C85.1","N/A","HoC/0148","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club Limited","2.1. If the ENE Panel finally determines that the Petitioner is entitled to be compensated in respect of the impact of the Proposed Scheme on the Property on the basis of Equivalent Reinstatement the Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with the Petitioner, where a business case is approved and where it relates to reasonable costs required to be spent in order to acquire the Equivalent Property in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Promoter, such agreement to provide that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Promoter being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured.\r\n2.2. If the ENE Panel finally determines that the Petitioner is not entitled to be compensated in respect of the impact of the Proposed Scheme on the Property on the basis of Equivalent Reinstatement then the terms of paragraph 3.2 below will then apply. \r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n\"ENE” means Early Neutral Evaluation being a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution as more particularly defined in the Civil Procedure Rules;\r\n\r\n“ENE Panel” means the independent panel appointed in accordance with the ADR Policy to determine the Matter In Dispute and which shall comprise at least one barrister, one solicitor and one surveyor each of whom shall be experienced in compensation law and practice;\r\n\r\n“Equivalent Property” means a property on which the Petitioner would construct and operate a new entire golf club in the event that the basis for the Petitioner’s compensation in respect of the Property is agreed to be Equivalent Reinstatement;\r\n\r\n“Equivalent Reinstatement” means compensation in respect of the compulsory acquisition of land pursuant to section 5(5) of the Land Compensation Act 1961;\r\n","ENE Process Outcome","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Ingestre Park Golf Club / Kington Hill Club Limited, assurance 2","2018-06-28","Assurance","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club, Ingestre, Stafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C85.2","N/A","HoC/0148","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club Limited","3.2. If:\r\n3.2.1. Additional Provision 2 is incorporated within the Act;\r\n3.2.2. the ENE Panel finally determines that the Petitioner is not entitled to be compensated in respect of the impact of the Proposed Scheme on the Property on the basis of Equivalent Reinstatement;\r\n3.2.3. the Conditions have been satisfied, \r\nthen the Promoter acknowledges that the Petitioner may develop the Reconfigured Course Land in accordance with the Planning Permission and the decisions of the Steering Group in respect of which the Promoter will compensate the Petitioner in accordance with the Compensation Code. \r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“ENE Panel” means the independent panel appointed in accordance with the ADR Policy to determine the Matter In Dispute and which shall comprise at least one barrister, one solicitor and one surveyor each of whom shall be experienced in compensation law and practice;\r\n\r\n“Reconfigured Course Land” means the three parcels of land shown for identification purposes only edged blue, green and pink on the Plan [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n\r\n","Reconfigured Course Land and Reconfigured Course Development\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Ingestre Park Golf Club / Kington Hill Club Limited, assurance 3","2018-06-28","Assurance","The three parcels of land shown for identification purposes only edged blue, green and pink on the Plan attached to the letter\r\n\r\nIngestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club, Ingestre, Stafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C85.3","N/A","HoC/0148","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club Limited"," 4.1.\tObjective\r\n4.1.1.\tTo assist HS2 Ltd and the Petitioner in jointly developing a plan for the Reconfigured Course Development as a result of the loss of land due to the Proposed Scheme. \r\n4.1.2.\tThe Steering Group will oversee negotiations in good faith between the parties in order to facilitate and conclude an agreement for the provision of the Reconfigured Course Land necessary for the Reconfigured Course Development and Petitioner’s business case.\r\n4.2.\tRole\r\nThe role of the Steering Group includes:\r\n4.2.1.\tProviding advice and reviewing outputs to assist the Petitioner in designing the Reconfigured Course Development;\r\n4.2.2.\tProviding the Petitioner with greater certainty regarding the scope of the Reconfigured Course Development and seeking to agree acceptable heads of claim;\r\n4.2.3.\tProgressing the settlement of an agreement relating to the provision of the Reconfigured Course Development on the Reconfigured Course Land;\r\n4.2.4.\tTake constructive steps to resolve any material issues and challenges that arise; and\r\n4.2.5.\tProvide guidance on the application of the Compensation Code to the Reconfigured Course Development and Reconfigured Course Land.\r\n4.3.\tMembership\r\nThe Steering Group shall comprise (unless otherwise agreed in writing):\r\n4.3.1.\tHS2 Ltd’s Head of Acquisitions;\r\n4.3.2.\tA representative of the Petitioner;\r\n4.3.3.\tHS2 Ltd’s Agent;\r\n4.3.4.\tThe Petitioner’s Agent; and\r\n4.3.5.\tAdditional parties as agreed in writing between HS2 Ltd and the Petitioner.\r\n4.4.\tDuration\r\n4.4.1.\tWith the Petitioner’s agreement the Steering Group shall be established as soon as reasonably practicable following the date of this letter and will meet until the objectives of the Steering Group have been fulfilled. \r\n4.5.\tMeetings\r\n4.5.1.\tThe Steering Group shall meet at least once every six weeks with additional meetings scheduled as necessary. The meetings will be chaired by the Head of Acquisitions.\r\n4.6.\tTerms of Reference\r\n4.6.1.\tThe members agree to develop a terms of reference for the Steering Group as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n","Steering Group","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Ingestre Park Golf Club / Kington Hill Club Limited, assurance 4","2018-06-28","Assurance","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club, Ingestre, Stafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C85.4","N/A","HoC/0148","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club Limited","5.1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the Petitioner’s securing the Planning Permission. \r\n5.2. The assistance referred to in paragraph 5.1 shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner’s in respect of the need for the Reconfigured Course Development","Assistance in relation to the Planning Permission","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Ingestre Park Golf Club / Kington Hill Club Limited, assurance 5","2018-06-28","Assurance","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club, Ingestre, Stafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C85.5","N/A","AP2/0025","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club Limited","1.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 2, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker, in exercising the powers under the Bill, to: \r\na.\tmaintain 18 golf holes at Ingestre Park Golf Club until 6 months before the Significant Construction Works Start Date and subsequently a minimum of 9 golf holes at the Ingestre Park Golf Club until the Significant Construction Works Start Date;\r\nb.\tuse reasonable endeavours to minimise the period during which there are fewer than 18 golf holes open; and\r\nc.\tnot, as far as is reasonably practicable, prevent vehicular and pedestrian access to and from the Clubhouse, Car Park and Greenkeepers Maintenance Area, as shown indicatively on the Plan, during the construction of the Authorised Works and operation of the Proposed Scheme. \r\n2.\tThe above assurances are subject to the following conditions: \r\na.\tthe timely delivery of all required environmental surveys and the outcome of those surveys being satisfactory;\r\nb.\tthe successful promotion of AP2;\r\nc.\tthe carrying out of such assurances would not have a detrimental impact on the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;  \r\nd.\tIngestre Park Golf Club agrees to progress the reconfiguration scheme at Ingestre Park Golf Club authorised under AP2 on a timely and cost effective basis and to work closely and cooperatively with the Nominated Undertaker; and \r\ne.\tIngestre Park Golf Club takes forward the relevant compensation and land agreements with the Nominated Undertaker, consents, design and construction of the new reconfigured golf course site expeditiously.\r\n3.\tThe Nominated Undertaker will continue to engage with Ingestre Park Golf Club and keep Ingestre Park Golf Club informed of any changes to the programme for construction of the HS2 works, in particular any change to the Significant Construction Works Start Date.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“AP2 ES” means the supplementary environmental statement deposited in the House of Commons on 8 February 2019 with AP2;\r\n\"British Pipeline Agency Diversion Works” means works for the purpose of diverting an existing British Pipeline Agency fuel pipeline annotated on the plans deposited with AP2 as Fuel Pipeline Work No. 44 on Replacement Sheets No 1-26 and 1-28;\r\n“Plan” means the plan attached to this assurance and labelled ‘AP2-00025 - Ingestre Park Golf Club - Indicative Location Plan of Facilities’;\r\n“Significant Construction Works” means the enabling, utility and main Authorised Works in the vicinity of the existing Ingestre Park Golf Club between Fradley and Yarlet, as set out in more detail in the AP2 ES, which includes, but is not limited to, the British Pipeline Agency Diversion Works; \r\n“Significant Construction Works Start Date” means the date on which the Significant Construction Works commence (which is reported as end of September 2021 in the AP2 ES indicative construction programme).","Number of golf holes","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Ingestre Park Golf Club / Kington Hill Club Limited, assurances 1 to 3","2019-05-15","Assurance","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club, Ingestre, Stafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C85.6","N/A","AP2/0025","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club Limited","1.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 2 and without prejudice to paragraph 1.c of the 2019 Assurance, the Secretary  of State will require the Nominated Undertaker, in exercising the powers under the Bill to execute the BPA Works,  to use reasonable endeavours to avoid obstruction or prevention of use by the Petitioner of the Greenkeepers track during the construction of the BPA Works. \r\n2.\tThe assurance set out in paragraph 1 is subject to the following conditions:\r\na)\tthe timely delivery of all required environmental surveys and the outcome of those surveys being satisfactory; \r\nb)\tthe discharge of the assurance not creating any new or different significant environmental effects; \r\nc)\tthe discharge of the assurance not having a detrimental impact on the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\nd)\tthe use by the Nominated Undertaker of the Greenkeepers track as a means of access for the construction of a junction between the Greenkeepers track and the Underbridge and for the operational maintenance of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\ne)\tthe use as a means of access to land required for the construction and maintenance of environmental mitigation works.\r\n3.    The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to continue to engage with the Petitioner in good faith to keep the Petitioner informed of any changes to the programme for construction of the BPA Works.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“2019 Assurance” means the letter of assurance from the Secretary of State to the Petitioner and dated 15 May 2019;\r\n“BPA Works” means works for the purpose of diverting an existing British Pipeline Agency fuel pipeline annotated on the plans deposited with AP2 as Fuel Pipeline Work No. 44 on Replacement Sheets No 1-26 and 1-28;\r\n“Greenkeepers track” means that part of the internal access and maintenance track connecting the visitors car park to the Golf Club with the Greenkeepers maintenance area as indicatively edged blue on the Plan.\r\n“Plan” means the plan attached to this assurance and labelled Annex B and the red line dotted on the Plan identifies the southern boundary set on the southern edge of the Greenkeepers track and gate entry to the Underbridge; \r\n “Reconfiguration Works” means the reconfiguration of the Golf Club to be undertaken on land proposed to be acquired under Bill including land identified for the purposes of AP2;\r\n“Underbridge” means the underbridge to be constructed as part of Work No.45 as described in Schedule 1 to the Bill;\r\n","Access Track","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Ingestre Park Golf Club / Kington Hill Club Limited, assurances 1 to 3","2020-08-25","Assurance","“BPA Works” means works for the purpose of diverting an existing British Pipeline Agency fuel pipeline annotated on the plans deposited with AP2 as Fuel Pipeline Work No. 44 on Replacement Sheets No 1-26 and 1-28;\r\n“Greenkeepers track” means that part of the internal access and maintenance track connecting the visitors car park to the Golf Club with the Greenkeepers maintenance area as indicatively edged blue on the Plan.\r\n“Plan” means the plan attached to this assurance and labelled Annex B and the red line dotted on the Plan identifies the southern boundary set on the southern edge of the Greenkeepers track and gate entry to the Underbridge; \r\n “Reconfiguration Works” means the reconfiguration of the Golf Club to be undertaken on land proposed to be acquired under Bill including land identified for the purposes of AP2;\r\n“Underbridge” means the underbridge to be constructed as part of Work No.45 as described in Schedule 1 to the Bill;\r\n\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C85.7","N/A","AP2/0025","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club Limited","1.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraphs 2, 3 and 6 but without prejudice to the generality of paragraph 1.a and 1.b of the 2019 Assurance, the Secretary of State will -\r\na)\teither i) exercise the powers of compulsory purchase proposed to be conferred under the Bill to vest the Reconfigured Course Land in the Secretary of State so that the Reconfigured Course Land may be occupied from the date of vesting by the Petitioner in order for the Petitioner to commence the construction of  Reconfiguration Works such date being no later than 1 April 2021; or ii) require the Nominated Undertaker to exercise the powers of temporary occupation proposed to be conferred under the Bill over the Reconfigured Course Land so that the Reconfigured Course Land may be occupied from the date of  possession by the Petitioner for the Petitioner to commence the construction of  Reconfiguration Works such date being no later than 1 April 2021; and\r\nb)\trequire the Nominated Undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to secure that the period of availability of a  minimum of 9 holes of golf specified in paragraph 1.a of the 2019 Assurance will be maintained at Ingestre Park Golf Club between the period of January 2022 to September 2022 notwithstanding the commencement date of the Significant Construction Works Start Date.\r\n2.\tThe assurance set out in paragraph 1 a) is subject to the following conditions:\r\na)\tthe enactment of the Bill on or before 31 December 2020; and\r\nb)\tvacant possession being taken of the Reconfigured Course Land on expiry of the relevant statutory notice period for vesting or temporary occupation of the Reconfigured Course Land.\r\n\r\n\"In these assurances:\r\n\"2019 Assurance\" means the letter of assurance from the Secretary of State to the Petitioner and dated 15 May 2019;\r\n\"Reconfigured Course Land\" means the land shown for identification purposes only edged blue on the Plan;\r\n\"Reconfiguration Works\" means the reconfiguration of Ingestre Park Golf Club to be undertaken by the Petitioner on land proposed to be acquired under the Bill including land identified for the purposes of AP2;\r\n\"Significant Construction Works Start Date\" means the date on which the Significant Construction Works commence (which is reported as end of September 2021 in the AP2 ES indicative construction programme); \r\n\"Cadent Works\" means the works to divert an existing gas pipeline and comprised within Work No 46 and shown on replacement sheets 1-26 and 1-28 on the Deposited Plans; \r\n\r\n","Reconfigured Course Land  ","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Ingestre Park Golf Club / Kington Hill Club Limited, assurances 1 to 2","2020-08-27","Assurance","The 'Reconfigured Course Land,' meaning the land at Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club, Ingestre, Stafford ST18 0RE, shown edged blue on the Plan at attached to the assurance letter\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C85.8","N/A","AP2/0025","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club Limited","3.\tThe assurance set out in paragraph 1 b) is subject to the following conditions:\r\na)\tthe timely delivery of all required environmental surveys and the outcome of those surveys being satisfactory;\r\nb)\tall required planning consent being secured so as to facilitate the availability of the 9 holes for the period between January 2022 and September 2022;\r\nc)\tthe carrying out of such an assurance does not have a prejudicial impact on the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; \r\nd)\tthe Petitioner progressing the Reconfiguration Works on a timely and cost effective basis to complete the Reconfiguration Works so that the Reconfigured Golf Club Land is available for use as a golf course by 1 October 2022; and\r\ne)\tthe Petitioner working closely and cooperatively with the Nominated Undertaker.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\"Reconfiguration Works\" means the reconfiguration of Ingestre Park Golf Club to be undertaken by the Petitioner on land proposed to be acquired under the Bill including land identified for the purposes of AP2;\r\n\r\n"," Environmental surveys ","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Ingestre Park Golf Club / Kington Hill Club Limited, assurance 3","2020-08-27","Assurance","The 'Reconfigured Course Land,' meaning the land at Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club, Ingestre, Stafford ST18 0RE, shown edged blue on the Plan at attached to the assurance letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C85.9","N/A","AP2/0025","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club Limited","4.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraphs 5 and 6 the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to secure the Planning Direction for the Reconfiguration Works as soon as practicable following enactment of the Bill.\r\n5.\tThe assurance set out in paragraph 4 is subject to the following conditions:\r\na)\tthe Petitioner providing in a timely manner to the Secretary of State all relevant planning information reasonably required by the Secretary of State to facilitate the making by the Secretary of State of the Planning Direction; and\r\nb)\tthe Petitioner proposing a cost effective solution for the Reconfiguration Works which  seeks to design and deliver the Reconfiguration Works in a manner which does not prejudice the timely and economic delivery of HS2 and mitigates the impact upon the operation of the Golf Club.\r\n6.\tThe assurances set out in paragraphs 1 and 4 are also subject to the following conditions:\r\na)\tthe Petitioner must enter into an  agreement  with the Secretary of States prior to Royal Assent of the Bill on terms satisfactory to the Secretary of State to give effect to the terms of the Secretary of State’s letter regarding the provision of funding  by the Secretary of State to the Petitioner for the construction of  Reconfiguration Works, such agreement making provision for the terms upon which funding shall be forthcoming and the subsequent safeguarding of the golf course as a community asset;\r\nb)\tthe Petitioner must secure any required additional environmental and planning consents beyond those contained in the Planning Direction or otherwise provided for under the Bill to facilitate the construction of Reconfiguration Works; and \r\nc)\tthe Petitioner must complete the design and construction of the Reconfiguration Works prior to 1 October 2022. \r\n\"In these assurances:\r\n\"Reconfiguration Works\" means the reconfiguration of Ingestre Park Golf Club to be undertaken by the Petitioner on land proposed to be acquired under the Bill including land identified for the purposes of AP2;\r\n“Secretary of State’s letter” means the letter dated 25 August 2020 from Mr Jon Griffiths to the Petitioner;\r\n“Planning Direction” means a direction by the Secretary of State pursuant to clause 47(1) of the Bill (Planning Permission: works involving reinstatement of undertakings) in respect of the Reconfiguration Works):\r\n\r\n","Planning Direction ","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Ingestre Park Golf Club / Kington Hill Club Limited, assurances 4 to 6","2020-08-27","Assurance","The 'Reconfigured Course Land,' meaning the land at Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club, Ingestre, Stafford ST18 0RE, shown edged blue on the Plan at attached to the assurance letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C85.10","N/A","AP2/0025","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club Limited","7.\tThe Secretary of State and the Nominated Undertaker will continue to engage with the Petitioner in good faith towards the construction by the Petitioner of the Reconfiguration Works.\r\n\"In these assurances:\r\n\"Reconfiguration Works\" means the reconfiguration of Ingestre Park Golf Club to be undertaken by the Petitioner on land proposed to be acquired under the Bill including land identified for the purposes of AP2;\r\n","Engagement with petitioner ","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Ingestre Park Golf Club / Kington Hill Club Limited, assurance 7","2020-08-27","Assurance","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club, Ingestre, Stafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C85.11","N/A","HoL/0029","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club Limited","1. Subject to the conditions in paragraph 2 being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to relocate the Grassland Habitat Creation and the Mitigation Pond from the Orange Land to the Red Land.\r\n2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are:\r\na.  that the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Grassland Habitat Creation and Mitigation Pond can be delivered on the Red Land without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statements accompanying the Bill;\r\nb.  that the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Grassland Habitat Creation and Mitigation Pond can be delivered on the Red Land within the existing powers of the Bill;\r\nc.  the Secretary of State securing any and all necessary consents for delivering the Grassland Habitat Creation and the Mitigation Pond on the Red Land within a timescale consistent with the construction period for the Proposed Scheme; and\r\nd.  the Secretary of State being of the view that the relocation of the Grassland Habitat Creation Land and the Mitigation Pond to the Red Land does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme and can be delivered within the construction programme for the Proposed Scheme.\r\n3. Nothing in this assurance shall prevent the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred by the Bill over the Orange Land for the purposes of the Grassland Habitat Creation and the Mitigation Pond:\r\na.  in the event that the conditions in paragraph 2 are not satisfied; and\r\nb.  to the extent that the Red Land is insufficient to accommodate the habitat mitigation.\r\n4. This assurance supersedes and replaces the assurances offered in letters dated 21 August 2020 and 19 January 2021.\r\n“In this Assurance:\r\n “Grassland Habitat Creation” means the land proposed to be used for environmental mitigation under the Bill on the Orange Land;\r\n“Mitigation Pond” means the mitigation pond proposed to be constructed under the Bill on the Orange Land; \r\n“the Orange Land” means the land to be used for the Grassland Habitat Creation and the Mitigation Pond under the Bill shown edged orange on the Plan annexed to this assurance;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; \r\n“Red Land” means the land shown shaded red on the Plan annexed to this assurance; \r\n\r\n","Grassland Habitat Creation ","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Ingestre Park Golf Club / Kington Hill Club Limited, assurance 1 to 4","2021-01-21","Assurance","Ingestre Park Golf Club and Kingston Hill Golf Club, Ingestre, Stafford ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C86","Doig, Dr Raymond and Mrs Suzanne ","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A\t","N/A"]
["C86.1","N/A","AP1/0005","Dr Raymond and Mrs Suzanne Doig\t","\r\n(1) In this assurance – \r\n \r\n“AP1” means the Additional Provision to the Bill as deposited in Parliament on 23 March 2018;\r\n\r\n\"the Bill\" means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill as deposited in Parliament on 17 July 2017 and amended by AP1;\r\n\r\n\"Bill Limits\" means the limit of deviation and the limits of land to be acquired or used shown on the deposited plans for the Bill; \r\n\r\n“protected property” means that part of the Petitioner’s property within plot number AP1-17 shown on the deposited plans for AP1; and\r\n\r\n“Works” means utility works to be undertaken beneath Newcastle Road, Cheshire East required in connection with the construction of the works to be authorised under the Bill.\r\n\r\n(2) Subject to paragraph (3) the nominated undertaker shall use reasonable endeavours to construct the Works without entering onto and using any part of the protected property.\r\n\r\n(3) Paragraph (2) is subject to the nominated undertaker designing and constructing the Works so as to avoid entry onto the protected property whilst being compliant with all applicable safety and regulatory controls required by either the relevant utility companies or the local highway authority.\r\n","Utility works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Raymond and Mrs Suzanne Doig, assurances 1 to 3","2018-06-29","Assurance","The “protected property” means that part of the Petitioner’s property within plot number AP1-17 shown on the deposited plans for AP1","Cheshire East"]
["C87","Garratt, Roy (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C87.1","N/A","HoC/0016","Roy Garratt (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","\r\n1.1 The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to reduce the extent of the landscape mitigation planting proposed to be located within the Yellow Land for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the Proposed Works.\r\n\r\n1.2 This assurance is subject to:-\r\n\r\n1.2.1 the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 5.1 does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n1.2.2 the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1 does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n\r\n1.2.3 the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1 receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“the Yellow Land” means the land shown in yellow on the attached plan (which is labelled as Plan 1)[attached to beneficiary letter] and comprises a scheme plan of the Environmental Mitigation Measures in respect of the Petitioners land;\r\n","Ecological and other mitigation measures on farmland","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-06-29","Assurance","The land shown in yellow on Plan 1 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C87.2","N/A","HoC/0016","Roy Garratt (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n\r\n1.2  The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n\r\n1.2.1  seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.","Detailed Design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-07-03","Assurance","The Stables, Casey Lane, Shavington, Crewe","Cheshire East"]
["C87.3","N/A","HoC/0016","Roy Garratt (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n\r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-07-03","Assurance","The Stables, Casey Lane, Shavington, Crewe","Cheshire East"]
["C87.4","N/A","HoC/0016","Roy Garratt (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","\r\n3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property, Casey Lane Stables, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, Casey Lane Stables, but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-07-03","Assurance","The Stables, Casey Lane, Shavington, Crewe","Cheshire East"]
["C87.5","N/A","HoC/0016","Roy Garratt (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","4.1 Provided that–\r\n\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n\r\n4.1.1.1  provides that the Property, Casey Lane Stables,  need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n\r\n4.1.1.2  restricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n\r\n4.1.1.3  provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n\r\n4.1.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having   regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\n\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2018-07-03","Assurance","The Stables, Casey Lane, Shavington, Crewe","Cheshire East"]
["C87.6","N/A","HoC/0016","Roy Garratt (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, Casey Lane Stables.\r\n\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2018-07-03","Assurance","The Stables, Casey Lane, Shavington, Crewe","Cheshire East"]
["C87.7","N/A","HoC/0016","Roy Garratt (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, Casey Lane Stables, but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property, Casey Lane Stables.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 6.1","2018-07-03","Assurance","The Stables, Casey Lane, Shavington, Crewe","Cheshire East"]
["C87.8","N/A","HoC/0016","Roy Garratt (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","\r\n7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property, Casey Lane Stables the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property, Casey Lane Stables but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property, Casey Lane Stables.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 7.1","2018-07-03","Assurance","The Stables, Casey Lane, Shavington, Crewe","Cheshire East"]
["C87.9","N/A","HoC/0016","Roy Garratt (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 8","2018-07-03","Assurance","The Stables, Casey Lane, Shavington, Crewe","Cheshire East"]
["C87.10","N/A","HoC/0016","Roy Garratt (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Barrie and Lesley Garratt, assurance 1","2019-03-14","Assurance","The Stables, Casey Lane, Shavington, Crewe","Cheshire East"]
["C87.11","N/A","HoC/0016","Roy Garratt (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","2.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Barrie and Lesley Garratt, assurance 2","2019-03-14","Assurance","The Stables, Casey Lane, Shavington, Crewe","Cheshire East"]
["C87.12","N/A","HoC/0016","Roy Garratt (Deceased) c/o Barrie Garratt","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Barrie and Lesley Garratt, Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","The Stables, Casey Lane, Shavington, Crewe","Cheshire East"]
["C88"," Moss, Mr John, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C88.1","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","1.1 Subject to the condition in paragraph 1.2, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to relocate the Blakenhall Cutting Satellite Compound to the Alternative Compound Site.\r\n\r\n1.2 The condition referred to in paragraph 1.1 is:\r\n\r\n1.2.1 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the relocation referred to in paragraph 1.1 will cause no significant effect on the environment above those reported in the Environmental Statement and which cannot be mitigated by reasonable means\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Alternative Compound Site” means the land shown indicatively edged orange on attached Plan 2[attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n\r\n“Blakenhall Cutting Satellite Compound” means the satellite compound shown indicatively edged green on attached Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter]; \r\n","Relocation of Blakenhall Cutting Satellite Compound","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-06-29","Assurance","The land shown indicatively edged orange and the satellite compound shown indicatively edged green on Plan 2 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C88.2","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","2.1 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 2.2, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to relocate the Temporary Material Stockpiles to the Alternative Stockpile Site. \r\n\r\n2.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 2.1 are:\r\n\r\n2.2.1 the successful promotion, if required, of an amendment to the Bill through the introduction of an Additional Provision, which confers on the Secretary of State the power to acquire and use the Alternative Stockpile Site for the purposes of accommodating temporary material stockpiles and associated purposes; and\r\n\r\n2.2.2 that the Secretary of State is satisfied that the relocation referred to in paragraph 2.1 will cause no significant effect on the environment above those reported in the Environmental Statement and which cannot be mitigated by reasonable means.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“Temporary Material Stockpiles” means the temporary material stockpiles co-located with the Blakenhall Cutting Satellite Compound and shown indicatively edged blue on attached Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter].\r\n\r\n“Alternative Stockpile Site” means the land shown indicatively edged red on attached Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter].\r\n","Relocation of Temporary Material Stockpiles","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-06-29","Assurance","The temporary material stockpiles co-located with the Blakenhall Cutting Satellite Compound and shown indicatively edged blue on Plan 1  attached to the letter, and also the land shown indicatively edged red on Plan 1.","Cheshire East"]
["C88.3","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","3.1 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 3.2 the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to provide the Den Lane Access. \r\n\r\n3.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 3.1 are:\r\n\r\n3.2.1 the successful promotion, if required, of an amendment to the Bill through the introduction of an Additional Provision, which confers on the Secretary of State the power to acquire compulsory and use the Access Site for the purposes of providing an access from Den Lane and associated purposes; and\r\n\r\n3.2.2 that the Secretary of State is satisfied that provision of the Den Lane Access will cause no significant effect on the environment above those reported in the Environmental Statement and which cannot be mitigated by reasonable means.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Den Lane Access” means an unmetalled access track shown indicatively by a blue line on Plan 3 [attached to beneficiary letter] which connects Den Lane to the Petitioner’s farmyard.\r\n","Access off Den Lane","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-06-29","Assurance","The access track shown indicatively by a blue line on Plan 3, attached to the letter, which connects Den Lane to the Petitioner’s farmyard.","Cheshire East"]
["C88.4","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","4.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the detailed design of the Den Lane Balancing Pond proposed to be constructed on the Petitioner’s property under the powers of the Bill.\r\n\r\n4.2 The nominated undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 4.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable seek to:\r\n\r\n4.2.1 minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n\r\n4.2.2 accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the detailed design of the works for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s farm enterprise following the completion of construction of the Den Lane Balancing Pond. \r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Den Lane Highway Balancing Pond” means the highway balancing pond shown indicatively coloured purple on Plan 4.\r\n","Den Lane Balancing Pond","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2018-06-29","Assurance","The highway balancing pond shown indicatively coloured purple on Plan 4 attached to the letter.","Cheshire East"]
["C88.5","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","5.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to review the extent of landscape planting within the Yellow land in considering the detailed design of such landscape mitigation planting with a view to reducing the extent of the planting on the Yellow land.\r\n\r\n5.2 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the detailed design of the landscape mitigation planting proposed to be carried out on the Yellow land under the powers of the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Yellow land” means the land coloured yellow on Plan 4 [attached to beneficiary letter].\r\n","Landscape Mitigation Planting","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2018-06-29","Assurance","The land coloured yellow on Plan 4 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C88.6","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n\r\n1.2  The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n\r\n1.2.1  seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n\r\n1.2.2  seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n\r\n1.3  In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n\r\n1.4  Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.7","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n\r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-07-03","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.8","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","\r\n3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property, Lower Den Farm, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, Lower Den Farm, but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n3.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-07-03","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.9","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","4.1 Provided that–\r\n\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n\r\n4.1.1.1 provides that the Property, Lower Den Farm, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n\r\n4.1.1.2 restricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n\r\n4.1.1.3 provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided \ton that land; [and\r\n\r\n4.1.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having   regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\n\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2018-07-03","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.10","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","\r\n5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2018-07-03","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.11","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","\r\n6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, Lower Den Farm, but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 6.1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.12","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 7.1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.13","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","\r\n8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 8","2018-07-03","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.14","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Provision of information \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2019-03-05","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.15","N/A","HoC/0011","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-03-05","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.16","N/A","HoC/0011, AP2/0037","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","\r\n1.1\tThe Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner to discuss the relocation of surplus material from the construction of the Proposed Scheme for the purpose of levelling out existing hollows within the Petitioner’s agricultural landholding, so far as is reasonably practicable.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 and amended by AP1 and AP2;\r\n “the Petitioner” means John, Dorothy and John Moss of Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX;\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Use of surplus materials","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company)\t","2019-04-15","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.17","N/A","HoC/0011, AP2/0037","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss"," 1.1\tIn carrying out the detailed design and construction of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, to merge the Balancing Ponds, reducing their volume as far as reasonably practicable.\r\n 1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n 1.2.1\tthe nominated undertaker is satisfied that any change to the Proposed Scheme design will not create any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill; \r\n 1.2.2\tthe nominated undertaker concludes that any change to the Proposed Scheme design can be delivered within the limits and powers of the Bill, and without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n1.2.3\tthe merged balancing pond does not become classified as a reservoir under the Reservoir Act 1975 (as amended).\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; \r\n“the Environmental Statement” means the Environmental Statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“the Balancing Ponds” refers to HS2 balancing ponds P24140 and P24123 as shown on map CT-06-236 as deposited with the Bill.\r\n","Balancing Ponds","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1\t","2019-04-18","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.18","N/A","HoC/0011, AP2/0037","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","2.1\tThe Secretary of State shall not exercise any permanent acquisition or temporary possession powers conferred by the Bill over the Specified Property or any part of the Specified Property for any purposes in connection with the excavation of materials from the Borrow Pit. This is subject to the Petitioner granting the Nominated Undertaker rights on reasonable terms for vehicular access between Area 2 and Area 4.\r\n2.2\tPrior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill that are proposed to be constructed on or operated from any part of the Property for the purposes of the operation of the Borrow Pit, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the Nominated Undertaker’s preparation of the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology.\r\n2.3\tThe Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation under paragraph 2.2 above and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors including but not limited to the relevant factors referred to in paragraph 2.5 below associated with the design, construction, operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit:\r\n2.3.1\tseek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n2.3.2\tseek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding operated by the Petitioner on or from the Property during the period of the excavation of the Borrow Pit by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.4\tNothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology which gives rise to any new or different significant environmental effects which have not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the Proposed Scheme.\r\n2.5\tThe relevant factors referred to in paragraph 2.3 above are:\r\n2.5.1\tany requirements of the local planning authority for the approval of the operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit under Schedule 17 of the Bill;\r\n2.5.2\tthe safe, timely and economic construction or operation of the Borrow Pit;\r\n2.5.3\tcompliance with other relevant undertakings and assurances; and\r\n2.5.4\tthe safe, timely and economic delivery of any other works for the Proposed Scheme connected with, or within the vicinity of, the Borrow Pit.”\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n “Area 2” means the area of Borrow Pit 6 that is shaded green and identified on Plan 1;\r\n“Area 4” means the area of Borrow Pit 6 that is shaded red and identified on Plan 1;\r\n“the Balancing Ponds” refers to HS2 balancing ponds P24140 and P24123 as shown on map CT-06-236 as deposited with the Bill;\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Borrow Pit” means the borrow pit identified on Plan 1 as Borrow Pit 6 and located within the area edged brown on Plan 2;\r\n“Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology” means the methodology for the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which shall include the following:\r\na) information on the method or methods for the extraction of materials from any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property;\r\nb) information on any other works and/or activities required in connection with the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which are to be constructed and/or undertaken on or from the Property; and\r\nc) information on any sequencing of material extraction operations for any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property;\r\n“the Petitioner” means John, Dorothy and John Moss of Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 9BX; \r\n“Plan 1” means the plan attached to this assurance with the title ‘Plan 1’;\r\n“Plan 2” means the plan attached to this assurance with the title ‘Plan 2’;\r\n“the Property” means the land and buildings owned by the Petitioner, excluding the Specified Property, situated within the Act limits (as defined in the Bill) located at Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 9BX and shown edged red on Plan 2; \r\n“the Specified Property” means that part of the land and buildings owned by the Petitioner situated within the Act limits (as defined in the Bill) located at the Property and shown hatched yellow on Plan 2.\r\n\r\n","Borrow Pit 6","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2\t","2019-04-18","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.19","N/A","HoC/0011, AP2/0037","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","1.1\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to not remove the Existing Bridge as part of the construction of the Proposed Scheme. \r\n 1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 of this assurance are that:\r\n(a)\tthe retention of the Existing Bridge (and any limited strengthening works) would not conflict with the works to realign and extent the West Coast Main Line tracks proposed in the Proposed Scheme, including Work No. 113;\r\n(b)\tthe Existing Bridge is suitable for use by HS2 construction traffic or would be suitable for use by HS2 construction traffic if it was subject to limited strengthening works (having regard to the carriage of Blakenhall Bridleway 8 across the Existing Bridge);\r\n(c)\tNetwork Rail consent to the retention of the Existing Bridge and its use by HS2 construction traffic, and any limited strengthening works; \r\n(d)\tthe nominated undertaker secures any necessary rights and/or consents for the retention of Existing Bridge, any limited strengthening works (including temporary interference with Blakenhall Bridleway 8) and its use by HS2 construction traffic; \r\n(e)\tthe retention of the Existing Bridge (and any limited strengthening works) would not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and\r\n(f)\tthe retention of the Existing Bridge (and any limited strengthening works) would not impact on the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme. \r\nIn these assurances:\r\n\"the attached plans\" means the plans attached to this assurance;\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement including any supplementary environmental statement deposited into Parliament with the Bill as amended by Additional Provisions; \r\n “the Existing Bridge” means the bridge carrying Blakenhall Bridleway 8 over the West Coast Main Line in the vicinity of Lower Den Farm which is in existence at the date of this assurance and is proposed to be removed as part of the Proposed Scheme (see Map No. CT-05-236 in the SES2 and AP2 ES);\r\n“limited strengthening works” means works to strengthen the Existing Bridge so that it would be suitable for use by HS2 construction traffic provided that: such works would be carried out at a reasonable cost; the necessary possessions of the West Coast Main Line would be obtained to carry out the works; any necessary consents or approvals would be obtained for the works; works would not be required to the foundations of the Existing Bridge and would be limited to the deck of the Existing Bridge; the works would not require any additional land or works powers from those conferred by the Bill; and the works would not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement;\r\n\"Owners\" means Mr John Moss (Snr) and Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss t/a JE DM and JE Moss;\r\n \"Owners’ Land\" means Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 9BX;\r\n\"proposed new access\" means the new access to the Owners’ Land to be constructed under AP2 as shown edged in red on the attached plans and labelled “Current access road location (AP2-005-006)”;\r\n\"proposed new access\" means the new access to the Owners’ Land to be constructed under AP2 as shown edged in red on the attached plans and labelled “Current access road location (AP2-005-006)”;\r\n“Work No. 114” means the work numbered 114 in Schedule 1 to the Bill together with all necessary works and conveniences; and\r\n “Work No. 113” means the work numbered 113 in Schedule 1 to the Bill together with all necessary works and conveniences.\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Existing Bridge","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1\t","2019-05-07","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.20","N/A","HoC/0011, AP2/0037","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","2.1. \tThe Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker in designing the proposed new access to reroute so far as reasonably practicable the proposed new access AP2-005-006 further to the east of the current route in line with the existing telegraph poles located on the Owners’ Land as shown indicatively edged in pink on the attached plans. \r\n2.2.\tThe assurance in paragraph 2.1 above is subject to all of the conditions in paragraph 2.3 below being satisfied.\r\n2.3.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 2.2 are:\r\n2.4.1\tthe Owners agreeing to grant all such rights as the nominated undertaker shall require over the Owners’ Land for the purpose of rerouting the proposed new access; and\r\n2.4.2\tthe nominated undertaker obtaining all relevant consents, including planning permission and/or highway consent as appropriate, required for the purpose of rerouting the proposed new access with any conditions placed on the nominated undertaker able to be reasonably implementable; \r\n2.4.3\tany claim for compensation under the Compensation Code shall be assessed on the basis of the access being located within the limits of deviation for Work No 111B as shown on Replacement Sheet No 1-59; and\r\n2.4.4\tthe nominated undertaker being satisfied that the rerouting of the proposed new access does not:\r\nI.\tgive rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed and reported on in the Environmental Statement and subsequent Supplementary Environmental Statements; \r\nII.\tadversely impact on the construction programme of the Proposed Scheme; and in all other respects; and\r\nIII.\tprejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n\"the attached plans\" means the plans attached to this assurance;\r\n “the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n “Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement including any supplementary environmental statement deposited into Parliament with the Bill as amended by Additional Provisions; \r\n \"Owners\" means Mr John Moss (Snr) and Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss t/a JE DM and JE Moss;\r\n \"Owners’ Land\" means Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 9BX;\r\nproposed new access\" means the new access to the Owners’ Land to be constructed under AP2 as shown edged in red on the attached plans and labelled “Current access road location (AP2-005-006)”;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Access Track","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2\t","2019-05-07","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C88.21","N/A","HoC/0011, AP2/0037","Mr John Moss, Mrs Dorothy Moss and Mr John Moss, T/As JE DM and JE Moss","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A\t","2019-07-09","Assurance","Lower Den Farm, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire CW3 9BX","Cheshire East"]
["C89"," Proudlove, Mr Philip and Mrs Sue ","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C89.1","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","\r\n1.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, where reasonably practicable, to modify the design of the proposed ecological mitigation on the Blue Land, for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the Proposed Scheme subject to the Petitioner’s agreement. \r\n\r\n1.2 The modifications referred to in paragraph 1.1 are subject to:\r\n \r\n1.2.1 the proposed modification in the ecological mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1, does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill; \r\n\r\n1.2.2 the proposed modification in the ecological mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 1.1, receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.  \r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Blue Land”  means the land coloured blue on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] numbered 1. The land has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of ecological mitigation. \r\n\r\n","Ecological Mitigation  ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-06-29","Assurance","The land coloured blue on the attached plan numbered 1 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C89.2","N/A ","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","\r\n2.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker as far as reasonably practicable, to reduce the depth of the environmental mitigation planting on the Green Land and reduce the gradient on the Red Land, in order that the Petitioner’s land holding is more readily available for agricultural use.\r\n\r\n2.2 The reductions referred to in paragraph 2.1 are subject to: \r\n\r\n2.2.1 the proposed reduction in the environmental mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 2.1 does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n2.2.2 the proposed reduction in the environmental mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 2.1 receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“the Green Land”  means the land coloured green on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] numbered 2. The land has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of landscape mitigation.  \r\n\r\n“the Red Land”  means the land outlined in red on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] numbered 2. The land has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of landscape mitigation.\r\n \r\n","Environmental Mitigation ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2 ","2018-06-29","Assurance","The land coloured green and the land outlined in red on the plan numbered 2 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C89.3","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove"," \r\n3.1 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 3.2, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours, to provide a permanent accommodation access suitable for agricultural use from Chorlton Lane to the Orange Land, for the benefit of the owner and occupiers of land in this field. \r\n\r\n3.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 3.1 are that:\r\n\r\n3.2.1 such access can be provided within the existing powers of the Bill and without the need for any additional land from that identified on the deposited plans as within the limits of land to be acquired or used for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n\r\n3.2.2 such access can be provided without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those identified in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n\r\n3.2.3 the determination of suitability for agricultural use shall be determined by the nominated undertaker, subject to consultation with the Petitioner. \r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“the Orange Land”  means the land coloured Orange on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] numbered 3. \r\n","Agricultural Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3 ","2018-06-29","Assurance","The land coloured Orange on the plan numbered 3 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C89.4","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove"," \r\n4.1 The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to reduce the extent of the landscape mitigation planting proposed to be located within the Yellow Land for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n4.2 This assurance is subject to: \r\n\r\n4.2.1 the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 4.1 does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill; \r\n\r\n4.2.2 the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 4.1 does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and \r\n\r\n4.2.3 the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 4.1 receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“the Yellow Land”  means the land coloured yellow on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] numbered 4. The land has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of landscape mitigation.\r\n","Reduction of Land Take at Sutch Farm","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4 ","2018-06-29","Assurance","The land coloured yellow on the plan numbered 4 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C89.5","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","\r\n5.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the detailed design of the balancing pond coloured blue on plan 4, proposed to be constructed upon the Petitioner’s landholding under the powers of the Bill.\r\n\r\n5.2 The nominated undertaker shall have regard to the Petitioner’s responses under paragraph 5.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of the balancing pond and other ecological or other mitigation seek to:  \r\n\r\n5.2.1 minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n\r\n5.2.2 accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the balancing pond.\r\n\r\n5.3 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the balancing pond which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the Proposed Scheme but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“the Blue Land”  means the land coloured blue on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter] numbered 1. The land has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of ecological mitigation. \r\n","Balancing Pond","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5 ","2018-06-29","Assurance","The land coloured blue on the plan numbered 1 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C89.6","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n\r\n1.2  The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n\r\n1.2.1  seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n\r\n1.3  In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n\r\n1.4  Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n\t","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe CW2 5BA;\r\nLand End Farm, Chorlton, Crewe CW2 5NF","Cheshire East"]
["C89.7","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","\r\n2.1  The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n\r\n2.2  Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n\r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-07-03","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe CW2 5BA;\r\nLand End Farm, Chorlton, Crewe CW2 5NF","Cheshire East"]
["C89.8","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property, Sutch Farm, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n3.2  In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-07-03","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe CW2 5BA","Cheshire East"]
["C89.9","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","4.1 Provided that–\r\n\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n\r\n4.1.1.1  provides that the Property, Sutch Farm, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n\r\n4.1.1.2  restricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n\r\n4.1.1.3  provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n\r\n4.1.2 \tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having   regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\n\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2018-07-03","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe CW2 5BA;\r\nLand End Farm, Chorlton, Crewe CW2 5NF","Cheshire East"]
["C89.10","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2018-07-03","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe CW2 5BA;\r\nLand End Farm, Chorlton, Crewe CW2 5NF","Cheshire East"]
["C89.11","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, Sutch Farm, but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 6","2018-07-03","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe CW2 5BA;\r\nLand End Farm, Chorlton, Crewe CW2 5NF","Cheshire East"]
["C89.12","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 7","2018-07-03","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe CW2 5BA;\r\nLand End Farm, Chorlton, Crewe CW2 5NF","Cheshire East"]
["C89.13","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","\r\n8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n\r\n8.3  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 8","2018-07-03","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe CW2 5BA;\r\nLand End Farm, Chorlton, Crewe CW2 5NF","Cheshire East"]
["C89.14","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","\r\n1.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to modify the design of the proposed ecological mitigation in the land edged red on the plan accompanying this assurance for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the Works.\r\n","Ecological mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-07-04","Assurance","The land edged red on the plan accompanying this assurance ","Cheshire East"]
["C89.15","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","\r\n2.1.The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to reduce the extent of the landscape mitigation planting proposed to be located within the land shaded green on the plan accompanying this assurance for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding following the completion of construction of the Works\r\n.\r\n2.2.The assurance in 2.1 is subject to:\r\n\r\n2.2.1.the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 2.1 does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n2.2.2.the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 2.1 does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n\r\n2.2.3. the proposed reduction in the landscape mitigation planting referred to in paragraph 2.1 receives approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n","Landscape mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-07-04","Assurance","The land shaded green on the plan accompanying this assurance","Cheshire East"]
["C89.16","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","\r\n3.1.The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in carry out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the land take for the balancing pond identified in blue shading on the plan accompanying this assurance.\r\n \r\n3.2.The assurance in 3.1 is subject to:\r\n\r\n3.2.1.the Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents required in order to deliver the drainage requirements for the Proposed Scheme at any alternative site;\r\n\r\n3.2.2.that any alternative site will not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n3.2.3.that the balancing pond can be relocated without prejudicing the safety, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Reduction in the land take for balancing pond","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-07-04","Assurance","The balancing pond identified in blue shading on the plan accompanying this assurance.","Cheshire East"]
["C89.17","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company),  assurance 1 ","2019-02-15","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe CW2 5BA","Cheshire East"]
["C89.18","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-02-15","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe CW2 5BA","Cheshire East"]
["C89.19","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, to review the use of permanent local placement of surplus excavated material on the Petitioners’ land (“the review”), and to seek to avoid any use of the Petitioners’ land for this purpose.\r\n2. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to include in the review consideration of potential alternative suitable sites for permanent local placement and the scope for integrating local placement with mitigation earthworks in the Blakenhall area.\r\n3. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to inform the Petitioners of the outcome of the review and, in the event that it is not reasonably practicable to avoid use of the Petitioners’ land for this purpose entirely, to seek to reduce the extent of local placement on their land so far as is reasonably practicable.\r\n4. The commitments in paragraphs 1 and 3 to avoid, or otherwise to reduce, the extent of local placement of surplus excavated material on the Petitioners’ land are subject to the following:\r\na) The Promoter being able to deliver an alternative solution for the proposed local placement with the consent of any relevant landowner and without the need for further consents;\r\nb) The alternative not giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and\r\nc) The alternative being capable of delivery without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Petitioners” means Philip and Sue Proudlove of Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe, CW2 5BA;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Local placement of surplus excavated soil","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurances 1 to 4","2019-05-01","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe, CW2 5BA","Cheshire East"]
["C89.20","N/A","HoC/0027","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe, CW2 5BA","Cheshire East"]
["C89.21","N/A","HoL/0002","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","1.1 The Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Yellow Land for the purposes of providing ecological mitigation at that location, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below.\r\n1.2 The assurance in paragraph 1.1 is subject to: \r\n(a) the Secretary of State being satisfied that the ecological mitigation, which was provided on a precautionary basis at the Property, can be removed from the Proposed Scheme design without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n(b) the Secretary of State being of the view that the removal of the ecological mitigation at the Property can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n(c) is subject to consent from local planning authority. \r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n \"Environmental Statement\" means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited at Parliament with the Bill;\r\n “the Petitioners” means Philip and Sue Proudlove of Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe, CW2 5BA;  \r\n “the Property” means Sutch Farm, Black Lane, Shavington, Crewe CW2 5BA owned by the Petitioners;\r\n “the Yellow Land” means the land shown as yellow on the attached plan being part of the land in plot 81 and 18 in the County of Cheshire as shown on Sheet Nos. 1-62 of the plans deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; ","Ecological Mitigation\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1 ","2020-03-03","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe, CW2 5BA","Cheshire East"]
["C89.22","N/A","HoL/0002","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","2.1  During the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, to use reasonable endeavours to provide the proposed Gate to the Property during construction for the purposes of maintaining the Petitioners’ access and connectivity to their agricultural land holdings subject to conditions at paragraph 2.2.\r\n 2.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 2.1 are that:\r\n (a)\tthe proposed Gate does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement with the Bill; \r\n(b)\tthe proposed Gate does not prejudice the timely, safe and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n(c)\tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the land required for the proposed Gate is not subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed Gate;\r\n(d)\tthe Petitioners are responsible for the management and maintenance of the proposed Gate; and\r\n(e)\tshould the Petitioners elect to construct the proposed Gate, the Secretary of State will provide the Petitioners with a reasonable sum to facilitate the construction of the proposed Gate.\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n \"Environmental Statement\" means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited at Parliament with the Bill;\r\n “the Gate” means the proposed gate within the Property, the location to which to be agreed with the Petitioner during the detailed design, for the purposes of facilitating the Petitioners’ agricultural use of their landholding; \r\n “the Petitioners” means Philip and Sue Proudlove of Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe, CW2 5BA;  \r\n “the Property” means Sutch Farm, Black Lane, Shavington, Crewe CW2 5BA owned by the Petitioners;\r\n\r\n\r\n","Provision of a Gate\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2 ","2020-03-03","Assurance","Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe, CW2 5BA","Cheshire East"]
["C89.23","N/A","HoL/0002","Mr Philip and Mrs Sue Proudlove","1.1\tDuring the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, to use reasonable endeavours to provide Access to the Property during construction and operation, indicatively illustrated on the Plan for the purposes of maintaining the Petitioners’ access to their agricultural land holdings subject to the conditions at paragraph 2.\r\n2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that:\r\n2.1\tThe proposed Access does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement with the Bill;\r\n2.2\tThe proposed Access does not prejudice the timely, safe and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;   \r\n2.3\tThe Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Promoter which provides for the construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed Access on the Petitioners’ landholding;\r\n2.4\tThe Promoter is satisfied that the land required for the proposed Access is not subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed Access; and \r\n2.5\tThe Petitioners’ enter into an agreement with the Promoter to accommodate any consequent relocation of Landscape Mitigation Planting in order to facilitate the Access at an alternative location within the Petitioners’ landholding subject that any relocation of Landscape Mitigation Planting does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement with the Bill and is approved under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“the Access” means the proposed access consisting of an accommodation access track between the unaffected land at Lane End Farm and the highways network as indicatively shown on the Plan;\r\n“the Environmental Statement” means the environmental Statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“the Landscape Mitigation Planting” means the proposed creation of landscape mitigation planting at the Property;\r\n“the Petitioners” means Philip and Sue Proudlove of Sutch Farm, Back Lane, Shavington, Crewe, CW2 5BA;\r\n“the Plan” means the attached plan indicatively illustrating the route of the proposed Access;\r\n“the Property”\tmeans Land End Farm, Chorlton, Crewe CW2 5NF owned by the Petitioners;\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Access to Land End Farm\t\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company) ","2020-03-03","Assurance","Land End Farm, Chorlton, Crewe CW2 5NF","Cheshire East"]
["C90","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children’s Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C90.1","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd"," \r\n1.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consult the Petitioner on the opportunities to return the Green Land to agricultural use, and where appropriate enter into a management and maintenance agreement with the Petitioner in accordance with paragraph 2.2.  \r\n\r\n1.2 Entry by the Secretary Of State into an agreement pursuant to paragraph 1.1 is conditional upon the following:-\r\n\r\n1.2.1 the agreement being in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the construction and maintenance of ecological habitat creation on the Green Land;\r\n\r\n1.2.2 the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of the ecological habitat creation on the Green Land; \r\n\r\n1.2.3 all activities to be permitted under the agreement complying with the required maintenance, management and monitoring plans to be incorporated in that agreement;\r\n\r\n1.2.4 does not affect the integrity of required habitat creation and does not negatively impact the Promoter’s objective of seeking to achieve no net loss in biodiversity; and\r\n\r\n1.2.5 any required consent being obtained from the local planning authority pursuant to paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\n1.3 Subject to an agreement being entered into pursuant to paragraph 2.1, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Green Land but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Green Land.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“the Green Land” means the land coloured green on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter], being land within the Petitioner’s ownership which has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of ecological mitigation;\r\n","Wetland Habitat Creation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-06-29","Assurance","The land coloured green on Plan 1 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C90.2","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","\r\n2.1 In carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to consider a reduction in the extent of the ancient woodland compensation planting proposed for the Yellow Land. \r\n\r\n2.2 In considering the reduction in the extent of the ancient woodland compensation planting proposed for the Yellow Land, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consider the suitability of the Red Land illustrated on Plan 2 as part of the nominated undertaker’s consideration of options for the reconfiguration the ancient woodland compensation planting on the Petitioners land holding.\r\n\r\n2.3 In the event of the Secretary of State concludes that the Red Land is suitable for the reconfiguration of the ancient woodland compensation planting, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to seek an agreement with the petitioner to relocate ancient woodland compensation planting to the Red land subject to the following -\r\n\r\n2.3.1 the Petitioner making available to the Secretary of State the Red Land for the relocation of ancient woodland compensation planting from the Yellow Land;\r\n\r\n2.3.2 the reconfiguration of the woodland habitat will not result in creating any new or different environmental effects than those reported in the Environmental Statement; \r\n\r\n2.3.3 the reconfiguration of the woodland habitat will not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n\r\n2.3.4 the Petitioner entering into a management and maintenance agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the construction and maintenance of the reconfigured ancient woodland compensation planting on the Red Land to be provided by the Petitioner;\r\n\r\n2.3.5 the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of the ecological habitat creation on the Red Land; \r\n\r\n2.3.6 the Secretary of State being satisfied there is no legal impediment to the Petitioner entering into and complying with an agreement under paragraph 3.3 which may prejudice the construction or maintenance of the ancient woodland compensation planting;\r\n\r\n2.3.7 does not affect the integrity of required habitat creation and does not negatively impact the Promoter’s objective of seeking to achieve no net loss in biodiversity; and\r\n\r\n2.3.8 any required consent being obtained from the local planning authority pursuant to paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Yellow Land” means the land coloured yellow on Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter], being land within the Petitioner’s ownership which has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of woodland habitat creation;\r\n\r\n“the Red Land” means the land coloured red on Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter], being land within the Petitioner’s ownership;\r\n","Woodland Habitat Creation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-06-29","Assurance","The land coloured yellow on Plan 2 attached to the letter\r\n\r\nThe land coloured red on Plan 2 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C90.3","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","\r\n3.1 In carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to consider relocation of the proposed area of grassland habitat creation as shown on the Blue Land to the Orange Land.\r\n\r\n3.2 In considering the relocation, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consider the suitability of the Orange Land.\r\n\r\n3.3 In the event the Secretary of State concludes that the Orange Land is suitable for the relocation, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to enter into an agreement with the Petitioner to agree the relocation of the grassland habitat creation subject to the following -\r\n\r\n3.3.1 the Petitioner making available to the Secretary of State the Orange Land for the relocation of the proposed area of grassland habitat creation;\r\n\r\n3.3.2 the reconfiguration of the habitat will not result in creating any new or different environmental effects from those reported in the Environmental Statement; \r\n\r\n3.3.3 the reconfiguration of the habitat will not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n\r\n3.3.4 the Petitioner entering into a management and maintenance agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the construction and maintenance of the relocated habitat creation to be provided on the Orange land;\r\n\r\n3.3.5 the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of the relocated habitat creation on the Orange Land; \r\n\r\n3.3.6 the Secretary of State being satisfied there is no legal impediment to the Petitioner entering into an agreement under paragraph 3.3, which may prejudice the construction or maintenance of the relocated habitat creation;\r\n\r\n3.3.7 the Petitioner does not affect the integrity of required habitat creation and does not negatively impact the Promoter’s objective of seeking to achieve no net loss in biodiversity; and\r\n\r\n3.3.8 any required consent being obtained from the local planning authority pursuant to paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“the Blue Land” means the land coloured blue on Plan 3 [attached to beneficiary letter], being land within the Petitioner’s ownership which has been identified within the Bill for the purposes of grassland habitat creation;\r\n\r\n“the Orange Land” means the land coloured orange on Plan 3 [attached to beneficiary letter], being land within the Petitioner’s ownership;\r\n\r\n\r\n","Relocation of grassland habitat creation ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-06-29","Assurance","The land coloured blue and the land coloured orange on Plan 3 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C90.4","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","\r\n1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.5","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n\r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-07-03","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.6","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property Netherset Hey Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Netherset Hey Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-07-03","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.7","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","\r\n4.1 Provided that–\r\n\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n\r\n4.1.1.1 provides that the Property Netherset Hey Farm need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n\r\n4.1.1.2\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n\r\n4.1.1.3\tprovides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided on that land; [and\r\n\r\n4.1.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\n\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2018-07-03","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.8","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2018-07-03","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.9","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property Netherset Hey Farm but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 6.1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.10","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","\r\n7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property Netherset Hey Farm the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 7.1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.11","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 8","2018-07-03","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.12","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2019-02-15","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.13","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","2.1 The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to offer appropriate assistance to the Petitioner in respect of the relocation of any agricultural buildings displaced for the purposes of the project where the replacement is either:\r\n2.1.1  to be provided for under a deemed planning consent granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015; or\r\n2.1.2 the subject of a separate application for planning consent.\r\n2.2  The assistance referred to in paragraph 2.1. shall (if requested by the Petitioner) include the provision of a statement of impact and timing for the Petitioner in respect of the need for relocation of an agricultural building.\r\n2.3  Paragraph 2.4. applies where notwithstanding any assistance provided in paragraph 2.1. a Petitioner provides to the Promoter evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the Promoter that consent referred to in paragraph 2.1. and required to give effect to the relocation of an agricultural building, is unlikely to be obtained and requests the Secretary of State to take steps to authorise the relocation of the displaced building by the exercise of the powers of clause 46 of the Bill.\r\n2.4  Any request to the Secretary of State by the Petitioner under paragraph 2.3. shall be considered by the Secretary of State in accordance with the policy relating to reinstatement of undertakings set out in section 7 of HS2 Information Paper C7, Business Relocation.\r\n2.5  In this assurance, “agricultural building” includes a residential building occupied as part of an agricultural building.\r\n2.6  In this assurance, a “statement of impact and timing” means a statement describing the impact of the work proposed to be undertaken in relation to the agricultural building(s) in question and the timescales in which those impacts are intended to be implemented.\r\n\r\n","Relocation of agricultural buildings ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-02-15","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.14","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","3.1 If prior to the giving of notice of entry or prior to the notice of vesting under a general vesting declaration to acquire land permanently (whether or not before Royal Assent) the Petitioner identifies suitable land for the relocation of an agricultural building (whether within or outside the Petitioner’s ownership) and the Petitioner provides to the Secretary of State a detailed course of action substantiating the relocation, the Secretary of State will confirm whether or not he accepts that the land identified and evidence supporting the course of action provides a reasonable basis for the Petitioner’s claim for compensation in the event that the Bill receives Royal Assent and the  Secretary of State exercises his powers of compulsory acquisition.\r\n3.2  In this assurance, “agricultural building” includes a residential building occupied as part of an agricultural building.\r\n","Identification of land for the relocation of agricultural buildings ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2019-02-15","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.15","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","4.1 The Promoter acknowledges that proper professional costs and fees reasonably incurred by the Petitioner for the purposes of seeking to identify suitable alternative premises at which to relocate an agricultural building which is subject to the power of compulsory acquisition under the Bill, will form a Head of Claim as part of any disturbance claim arising from the acquisition of that land under the Bill.\r\n","Professional costs and fees ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2019-02-15","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.16","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","5.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n5.2  The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n5.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n5.4 Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n5.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n5.6  Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer. ","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2019-02-15","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.17","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","1.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 2 below, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker in carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to consider a relocation of the area designated for ancient woodland compensation planting on the Yellow Land while maintaining the Ecological Connectivity Corridor. \r\n2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1 above are that: \r\n2.1\tthe nominated undertaker shall \r\n(i)\tconsider the suitability of the Replacement Land and the maintenance of the Ecological Connectivity Corridor as part of the options for the reconfiguration of the area of ancient woodland compensation planting on the Owners’ Land; and \r\n(ii)\tengage with the Owners during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme regarding the size and location of the Ecological Connectivity Corridor on the Yellow Land \r\n3.\tIn assessing the suitability of the Replacement Land the Secretary of State shall be satisfied that the provision of ancient woodland compensation planting on the Replacement Land will not: \r\n(i)\tresult in creating new or different environmental effects from those reported in the Environmental Statement; \r\n(ii)\tprejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n(iii)\tadversely affect the integrity of the ancient woodland compensation planting required to be provided on the Owners’ Land; and \r\n(iv)\tadversely affect the objective to achieve no net loss in biodiversity. \r\n4.\tSubject to the Secretary of State being satisfied that the Replacement Land and Ecological Connectivity Corridor is suitable for ancient woodland compensation planting and provided that the conditions in paragraph 5 below are fulfilled the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to seek the agreement of the Owners to relocate the ancient woodland compensation planting from the Yellow Land to the Replacement Land. \r\n5.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 4 above are: \r\n5.1\tthe Secretary of State being satisfied that\r\n(i)\tthere is no legal and/or other impediment to the Owners entering into and thereafter complying with an agreement referred to in paragraph 4 above which may prejudice the construction and/or maintenance of Replacement Land and Ecological Connectivity Corridor as ancient woodland compensation planting; \r\n(ii)\tthe Owners are appropriate persons, having regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for continuing maintenance of the ancient woodland compensation planting on the Replacement Land and Ecological Connectivity Corridor; and \r\n(iii)\tthe nominated undertaker obtains all necessary consents for the purpose of locating the ancient woodland compensation planting on the Replacement Land, including the necessary approval of the relevant local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17.\r\n5.2\tthe Owners: \r\n(i)\tmaking the Replacement Land and Ecological Connectivity Corridor and any access to and egress from the Replacement Land and Ecological Connectivity Corridor available for the purpose of relocating ancient woodland compensation planting from the Yellow Land; and \r\n(ii)\tentering into an agreement with, and in the form satisfactory to, the Secretary of State for the purpose of the construction, management and maintenance of the Replacement Land by the Owners as ancient woodland compensation planting.”\r\nIn this assurance:-       \r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to “the Bill” includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;                                      \r\n“Ecological Connectivity Corridor” means a reduced area of ancient woodland compensation planting (indicatively shown in blue) to provide a link between the existing woodlands at Aldersley Rough to the north and Hey Sprink to the south of the Yellow Land;\r\n “Land” means Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE of which the Yellow Land and the Replacement Land form part; \r\n“no net loss in biodiversity” means the objective of the Proposed Scheme to achieve no net loss in biodiversity by, inter alia, planting new woodland to address losses that could not be avoided; \r\n“Owners” means Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children’s Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms LTD Owners;\r\n“the Petitioner” means  Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children’s Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd;\r\n“Plan” means the plan attached to this Assurance; \r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Replacement Land” means the land coloured red and purple on the plan forming part of the Owners’ Land to be used for ancient woodland compensation planting instead of the Yellow Land \r\n“Yellow Land” means the area designated for ancient woodland compensation planting shown coloured yellow on the plan.\r\n","Ecological Connectivity Corridor","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurances 1 to 5","2019-05-07","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.18","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","1.1\tSubject to the completion of further ground investigations to inform the extent of material extraction operations required to be undertaken from the Borrow Pit for the purposes of facilitating the timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to use reasonable endeavours not to use the Blue Land or any part of the Blue Land for the purposes of undertaking material extraction operations for the Borrow Pit.\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“the Blue Land” means that part of the Property shown coloured blue and labelled Area 1 on Plan 2;\r\n“the Borrow Pit” means the borrow pit identified on Plan 2 as Area 2 and located within the area edged Green on Plan 2;\r\n“Plan 2” means the plan attached to this assurance with the title ‘Plan 2’;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.","Use of the Blue Land","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2019-05-08","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.19","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","2.1\tPrior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill that are proposed to be constructed on or operated from any part of the Property for the purposes of the operation of the Borrow Pit, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the Nominated Undertaker’s preparation of the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology.\r\n2.2\tThe Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation under paragraph 2.1 above and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors including but not limited to the relevant factors referred to in paragraph 2.4 below associated with the design, construction, operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit,\r\n2.2.1\tnotwithstanding paragraph 1.1 above, seek to reduce the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988;\r\n2.2.2\tseek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding operated by the Petitioner on or from the Property during the period of the excavation of the Borrow Pit by the Nominated Undertaker; and\r\n2.2.3\tseek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology for the purposes of ensuring any minerals located within the Property that are not extracted by the Nominated Undertaker for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme shall remain accessible for potential future extraction following the Nominated Undertaker’s restoration of the Borrow Pit.\r\n2.3\tNothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology which gives rise to any new or different significant effect on the environment which has not been addressed in the environmental statement for the Proposed Scheme.\r\n2.4\tThe relevant factors referred to in paragraph 2.2 above are:-\r\n2.4.1\tany requirements of the local planning authority for the approval of the operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit under Schedule 17 of the Bill;\r\n2.4.2\tthe safe, timely and economic operation of the Borrow Pit;\r\n2.4.3\tcompliance with other relevant undertakings and assurances; and\r\n2.4.4\tthe safe, timely and economic delivery of any other works for the Proposed Scheme connected with, or within the vicinity of, the Borrow Pit.\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“the Borrow Pit” means the borrow pit identified on Plan 2 as Area 2 and located within the area edged Green on Plan 2;\r\n“Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology”\tmeans the methodology for the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which shall include the following:-\r\na)\tinformation on the method or methods for the extraction of materials from any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property,\r\nb)\tinformation on any other works and/or activities required in connection with the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which are to be constructed and/or undertaken on or from the Property,\r\nc)\tinformation on any sequencing of material extraction operations for any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property, and\r\nd)\tinformation on the method or methods to be employed for ensuring that any minerals located within the Property that are not extracted by the Nominated Undertaker for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme shall remain accessible for potential future extraction following the Nominated Undertaker’s restoration of the Borrow Pit.\r\n\r\n","Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-05-08","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.20","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","3.1\tIn the event that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of the Bill to compulsorily acquire the Property or any part of the Property the compensation payable by the Secretary of State for land will be assessed by the Secretary of State in accordance with the Compensation Code which will include the full open market value of the land and may include potential development value of the land for mineral extraction. “In these assurances:-\r\n“Compensation Code” means the code of statute and case law determining the compensation to be paid to landowners and occupiers of land where land or rights in land are authorised to be compulsorily acquired under the Bill;\r\n“the Property” means the land and buildings owned and occupied by the Petitioner situated within the Act limits (as defined in the Bill) located at Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Lane, Crewe, CW3 9P and shown shaded green on Plan 2.","Compensation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2019-05-08","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE ","Cheshire East"]
["C90.21","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","4.1\tFollowing the completion of the construction of works for the Proposed Scheme that are to be constructed on or from the Property, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to:-\r\n4.1.1\treinstate the existing route of the Footpath that passes through the Accommodation Underbridge; and\r\n4.1.2\treinstate the Farm Access Track to a standard that is, as far as is reasonably practicable, the same as the standard of the Farm Access Track immediately prior to the Nominated Undertaker taking possession of the Farm Access Track for the purpose of constructing the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Footpath” means the footpath known as Footpath Madeley 14 which is located in the Parishes of Whitmore and Madeley; \r\n“Farm Access Track” means that section of the existing farm access track which passes through the Accommodation Underbridge;\r\n“Accommodation Underbridge”\tmeans the existing accommodation underbridge on the Stoke to Market Drayton Railway the position of which is marked ‘Accommodation Underbridge’ on Plan 1;\r\n“Plan 1” means the plan attached to this assurance with the title ‘Plan 1’.","Accommodation Underbridge","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2019-05-08","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.22","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","5.1\tThe Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker, for the duration of the period that works for the Proposed Scheme are being constructed on or from the Property, to provide the Petitioner with the Temporary Access.\r\n5.2\tIf during the period that works for the Proposed Scheme are being constructed on or from the Property, the Petitioner’s use of the Temporary Access is to be subject to any temporary restrictions as may be required by the Nominated Undertaker to ensure the safe operation of any construction works for the Proposed Scheme that are located in the vicinity of the Temporary Access, then the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to:-\r\n5.2.1\tprovide the Petitioner with such prior notice of the commencement of any temporary restrictions as is reasonable practicable; and  \r\n5.2.2\tseek to minimise as far as is reasonably practicable the duration of any temporary restrictions.\r\n5.3\tPrior to the completion of the detailed design of the Diversion, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to engage with the Petitioner and use reasonable endeavours to agree with the Petitioner the appropriate timescales for the construction of any works by the Nominated Undertaker that may be required to provide the Temporary Access.\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“the Temporary Access”\tmeans a temporary means of vehicular and pedestrian access over and along the Diversion for the purposes of the Petitioner accessing to and from that part of the Property that abuts the Diversion and which is located immediately adjacent to the Temporary Material Stockpile; and\r\n“the Temporary Material Stockpile”\tmeans the temporary material stockpile located to the north-east of Madeley Footpath 24 and which is shown coloured brown on plan CT-05-233 of Volume 2: Map Book, CA4:Whitmore Heath to Madeley, of the Supplementary Environmental Statement 2 and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement as submitted with additional provision 2 (February 2019) to the Bill.\r\n“the Diversion” means that section of the diversion route for Madeley Footpath 24 which is shown connecting Bar Hill Road and Bower End Lane on Plan 3;\r\n\r\n“Plan 3” means the plan attached to this assurance with the title ‘Plan 3’.\r\n","Temporary Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to  Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2019-05-08","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.23","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","28. The Promoter will enter into discussions with the Trust to agree terms for temporary possession of the borrow pit land, unless otherwise agreed with the Trust.  When assessing the terms for temporary possession, the Promoter will refer to HS2 Phase 2a Information Paper C3: Land Acquisition Policy, such that the overall cost to the Promoter does not exceed the cost of proceeding on a permanent basis with compulsory acquisition and subsequent disposal of the land.","Temporary possession of borrow pit","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's Third Special Report of Session 2017-2019, paragraph 28","2019-06-24","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.24","N/A","HoC/0040","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.25","N/A","HoL/0003","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","1. The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to meet the reasonable costs for the Petitioner to instruct a suitably qualified person to undertake a full investigation of Title of the Land. This Assurance is subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 2.\r\n2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are:\r\n2.1  The scope of the instruction referred to in paragraph 1 is for a firm of solicitors to provide a Certificate of Title for the Borrow Pit (including minerals) based on the Law Society’s approved form.\r\n2.2  The firm of solicitors instructed by the Petitioners must be approved by the Nominated Undertaker, or their legal advisors, so to ensure the solicitors are of sufficient standing that the Certificate of Title can be relied upon.\r\n2.3  The costs to be met by the Nominated Undertaker are subject to a cap of £10,000 (inclusive of VAT and disbursements) and will be a ‘contribution’ to reasonable and properly incurred legal fees in providing the Certificate of Title, with the Petitioners meeting any further amount.\r\n2.4  The Nominated Undertaker will pay costs up to the amount specified in paragraph 2.3 directly to the firm of solicitors instructed by the Petitioners, upon receipt of Certificate of Title and invoices.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n “the Borrow Pit” means the borrow pit identified on the Plan as Area 2 and located within the area shaded Green on the Plan.\r\n“the Land” means the land registered at HM Land Registry under Title Numbers: SF397271; SF200540; SF310775.\r\n\r\n","Payment of professional fees in respect to certificate for title of borrow pit\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1 to 2","2020-03-05","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C90.26","N/A","HoL/0003","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","I am therefore writing to you, on behalf of the Secretary of State, to offer your clients the attached undertaking which gives effect to the House of Commons Select Committee’s direction that the borrow pit land should not be retained permanently by the Secretary of State but should be returned to your clients following the working and restoration of the borrow pit.  The Secretary of State’s proposal is to offer the affected land for purchase by your clients following the completion of the borrow pit works, on the basis that the land has not materially changed.  The undertaking contains comments to identify where further detail is required before it is sealed by the Secretary of State.  However, at this stage, I can offer your clients an assurance that the Secretary of State will enter into the commitments contained in the unilateral undertaking pending the provision of that detail.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Commitment contained in the unilateral undertaking\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1 to 2","2020-09-01","Assurance","Netherset Hey Farm, Netherset Hey Lane, Madeley, Crewe CW3 9PE","Cheshire East"]
["C91","Williams, Mr Richard and Mrs Alison and  Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C91.1","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","1.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in exercise of the powers contained in the Bill not to use BW2 as a vehicular construction traffic route in connection with the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“BW2” means the part of Madeley Bridleway 2 shown in red on the attached Plan 2 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n","Construction Traffic \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-06-30","Assurance","The part of Madeley Bridleway 2 shown in red on the Plan 2 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C91.2","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","\r\n2.1 Subject to paragraph 2.2 and to the nominated undertaker and the Petitioner agreeing to the scope, design, programming and cost of the new access tracks the Secretary of State will meet the reasonable and proper costs incurred by the Petitioner carrying out the construction of the new access tracks. \r\n\r\n2.2 The design and construction of the new access tracks shall be subject to:-\r\n\r\n2.2.1 the provision of the new access tracks not creating any new design or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill; and\r\n\r\n2.2.2 the provision of the new access tracks not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\n2.3 Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph 2.1 the new access tracks shall include a section of track at the toe of the Embankment to provide a crossing point beneath the railway in approximately the position shown coloured pink on Plan 5, the final location being determined through detailed design and engagement with the Petitioner. \r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“new access tracks” means new tracks to be constructed within the Property, following completion of the Works,\r\n","Agricultural Access Tracks ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-06-30","Assurance","The tracks to be constructed within the Property, and a section of track at the toe of the Embankment to provide a crossing point beneath the railway in approximately the position shown coloured pink on Plan 5 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C91.3","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","\r\n3.1 In carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State shall, subject to the conditions in paragraph 3.2, require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reconfigure so far as reasonably practicable the Balancing Pond by reducing its size and realigning the hedgerows bordering the Balancing Pond in order that the alignment of the hedgerows more closely follows the boundary of the Balancing Pond.\r\n\r\n3.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 3.1 are that the proposed alterations/realignment referred to in paragraph 3.1 does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Balancing Pond” means the balancing pond shown coloured blue on the attached Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n","Balancing Pond","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-06-30","Assurance","The balancing pond shown coloured blue on the Plan 1 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C91.4","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","\r\n4.1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to complete the detailed design of Madeley Bridleway 2 Accommodation Underbridge, so as to provide a minimum vertical clearance of 5.7 metres by a minimum horizontal clearance of 5.5 metres, from the surface of the track beneath the underbridge and the underside of the underbridge.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Madeley Bridleway 2 Accommodation Underbridge” means the accommodation underbridge shown in orange on Plan 1 [attached to beneficiary letter].\r\n","Embankment Underpass","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2018-06-30","Assurance","The accommodation underbridge shown in orange on Plan 1 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C91.5","N/A\t\t","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","\r\n5.1 In carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State shall, subject to the conditions in paragraph 5.2, require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reduce, reconfigure and/or, so far as reasonably practicable, relocate the Stockpiles within the Property.\r\n\r\n5.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 5.1 are that:\r\n\r\n5.2.1 such relocated facilities can be provided within the existing powers of the Bill within the Property and without the need for any additional land from that identified on the deposited plans for the Bill;\r\n\r\n5.2.2 the proposed reduction, relocation or reconfiguration of the Stockpiles does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n5.2.3 the proposed reduction, relocation or reconfiguration of the Stockpiles does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n\r\n5.2.4 the proposed reduction, relocation or reconfiguration of the Stockpiles receives any required approval from the local planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n","Temporary Material Stockpiles","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2018-06-30","Assurance","That part of Wrinehill Hall Farm within Bill Limits and shown edged in red on Plan 3 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C91.6","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","\r\n6.1 In the design and construction of the Landscape Earthworks, the nominated undertaker shall, subject to the conditions in paragraph 6.2, use reasonable endeavours to reduce the areas of agricultural land required for Landscape Earthworks.\r\n\r\n6.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 6.1 are that:\r\n\r\n6.2.1 the proposed reduction in Landscape Earthworks does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n\r\n6.2.2 the proposed reduction in Landscape Earthworks does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n\r\n6.2.3 the proposed reduction in Landscape Earthworks receives any required approval from the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Stockpiles” means the areas of the Property shown edged Blue on the attached Plan 4 [attached to beneficiary letter] which are required for use as temporary material stockpiles required in connection with the construction of the Works;\r\n","Landscape Earthworks","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 6","2018-06-30","Assurance","The areas of the Property shown edged Blue on the Plan 4  attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C91.7","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","\r\n7.1 Where existing conduits on the Property would be severed as a result of the construction of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, prior to the completion of the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, to consult with the Petitioner to seek to provide, where reasonably practicable, replacement conduits necessary for the efficient management of the Petitioner’s Property as a farm enterprise.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“Property” means that part of Wrinehill Hall Farm within Bill Limits and shown edged in red on the attached Plan 3 [attached to beneficiary letter];\t\r\n","Provision of Conduits","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 7","2018-06-30","Assurance","That part of Wrinehill Hall Farm within Bill Limits and shown edged in red on the Plan 3 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C91.8","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","\r\n8.1 The Secretary of State will use reasonable endeavours to reach an agreement with the Petitioner, where a business case is approved and where it relates to the provision of funding for the acquisition by the Petitioner of additional land that may be necessary for the Petitioner’s farm business, in consequence of permanent acquisition by the Secretary of State of land required for that business.\r\n\r\n8.2 An agreement entered into under paragraph 8.1 shall provide that compensation will be paid in advance of entry after Royal Assent, subject to the Secretary of State being satisfied there is no subsisting mortgage over the land in question and that suitable security for any advanced payment can be adequately secured. \r\n","Provision of Replacement Agricultural Land","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 8","2018-06-30","Assurance","That part of Wrinehill Hall Farm within Bill Limits and shown edged in red on the Plan 3 attached to the letter","Cheshire East"]
["C91.9","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Wrinehill Hall Farm, Mill Lane, Betley, Crewe CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C91.10","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n\r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n\r\n2.4  The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-07-03","Assurance","Wrinehill Hall Farm, Mill Lane, Betley, Crewe CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C91.11","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property, Wrinehill Hall Farm, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, Wrinehill Hall Farm, but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-07-03","Assurance","Wrinehill Hall Farm, Mill Lane, Betley, Crewe CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C91.12","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","4.1 Provided that–\r\n\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n\r\n4.1.1.1 provides that the Property, Wrinehill Hall Farm, need not be restored to its former \tcondition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n\r\n4.1.1.2  restricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which \tare to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n\r\n4.1.1.3  provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided \ton that land; [and\r\n\r\n4.1.2 \tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having   regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\n\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2018-07-03","Assurance","Wrinehill Hall Farm, Mill Lane, Betley, Crewe CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C91.13","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2018-07-03","Assurance","Wrinehill Hall Farm, Mill Lane, Betley, Crewe CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C91.14","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","\r\n6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, Wrinehill Hall Farm, but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 6.1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Wrinehill Hall Farm, Mill Lane, Betley, Crewe CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C91.15","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 7","2018-07-03","Assurance","Wrinehill Hall Farm, Mill Lane, Betley, Crewe CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C91.16","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 8","2018-07-03","Assurance","Wrinehill Hall Farm, Mill Lane, Betley, Crewe CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C91.17","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2019-02-27","Assurance","Wrinehill Hall Farm, Mill Lane, Betley, Crewe CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C91.18","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-02-27","Assurance","Wrinehill Hall Farm, Mill Lane, Betley, Crewe CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C91.19","N/A","HoC/0053","Mr Richard and Mrs Alison Williams, Mr Jeffrey and Mrs Sheila Thornhill","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Wrinehill Hall Farm, Mill Lane, Betley, Crewe CW3 9DB","Cheshire East"]
["C92","Davies Mr J, R and Miss M J Davies and Mr David Hollinshead","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C92.1","N/A","AP1/0033","Mr J R Davies, Miss M J Davies and Mr David Hollinshead","1.1.The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker not to use Larch Avenue (Basford, Crewe) for HS2 construction traffic during the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Construction Traffic","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Hazel Coen, assurance 1.1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Larch Avenue","Cheshire East"]
["C92.2","N/A","AP1/0033","Mr J R Davies, Miss M J Davies and Mr David Hollinshead","\r\n2.1.The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to liaise with relevant local authorities (including Cheshire East Council and the Wybunbury Ward Combined Parishes) with a view to determining appropriate hoarding and visually amenable acoustic and visual mitigation around the Basford Cutting Transfer Node, Basford Cutting Batching Plant and Basford Cutting Main Compound.\r\n","Liaison with location authorities regarding hoarding and visually amenable acoustic and visual mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Hazel Coen, assurance 2 \r\n","2018-07-03","Assurance","Basford Cutting Transfer Node, Basford Cutting Batching Plant and Basford Cutting Main Compound","Cheshire East"]
["C92.3","N/A","AP1/0033","Mr J R Davies, Miss M J Davies and Mr David Hollinshead","3.1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker not to dig up Footpath Basford 11 shown on Replacement Sheet No. 1-62 of the plans deposited with the Additional Provision, nor the hedgerows and trees directly alongside it, whilst carrying out work AP-005-121 (to temporarily divert a water main to supply the construction compounds) as shown on map CT-05-239 in Volume 2 of the SES and AP ES.\r\n","Footpath Basford 11 and the hedgerows and trees directly alongside it","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Hazel Coen, assurance 3.1\r\n","2018-07-03","Assurance","Footpath Basford 11 shown on Replacement Sheet No. 1-62 of the plans deposited with the Additional Provision and the hedgerows and trees directly alongside it.  \r\n\r\nThe work shown on map CT-05-239 in Volume 2 of the SES and AP ES.\r\n","Cheshire East"]
["C93","Wright, David, Fiona, Monty and Gwen and T/A H G Wright ","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C93.1","N/A","HoC/0024","David, Fiona, Monty and Gwen Wright T/A H G Wright","\r\n1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n\r\n1.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n\r\n1.3 In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n\r\n1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Ash Tree Farm, Mill Lane, Blakenhall, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7NP","Cheshire East"]
["C93.2","N/A","HoC/0024","David, Fiona, Monty and Gwen Wright T/A H G Wright","2.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of landraising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 2.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n\r\n2.2 Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 2.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period. \r\n\r\n2.3 The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n\r\n2.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2018-07-03","Assurance","Ash Tree Farm, Mill Lane, Blakenhall, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7NP","Cheshire East"]
["C93.3","N/A","HoC/0024","David, Fiona, Monty and Gwen Wright T/A H G Wright","\r\n3.1 Subject to the Petitioner entering an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides that the Property, Ash Tree Farm, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, Ash Tree Farm, but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n3.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed but there is no need for maintenance of that change","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2018-07-03","Assurance","Ash Tree Farm, Mill Lane, Blakenhall, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7NP","Cheshire East"]
["C93.4","N/A","HoC/0024","David, Fiona, Monty and Gwen Wright T/A H G Wright","\r\n4.1 Provided that–\r\n\r\n4.1.1 the Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which–\r\n\r\n4.1.1.1 provides that the Property, Ash Tree Farm, need not be restored to its former condition following completion of construction activity on the land; and\r\n\r\n4.1.1.2 restricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway; and\r\n\r\n4.1.1.3 provides for the maintenance of the environmental mitigation to be provided \ton that land; [and\r\n\r\n4.1.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having  regard to the nature and objectives of the mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation;] \r\n[N.B. only relevant where this is a site identified for ecological mitigation]\r\n\r\nthe Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n\r\n4.2 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land is materially changed and there is a need for an obligation to maintain","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 4","2018-07-03","Assurance","Ash Tree Farm, Mill Lane, Blakenhall, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7NP","Cheshire East"]
["C93.5","N/A","HoC/0024","David, Fiona, Monty and Gwen Wright T/A H G Wright","\r\n5.1 Where the Nominated Undertaker exercises powers of temporary occupation over land under the Bill which is subject to compulsory acquisition and the Nominated Undertaker proposes to the Petitioner that the Petitioner enters into an agreement with the Secretary of State for the purposes of assurances 3.1 and 4.1, the Petitioner may at any time prior to entry into an agreement under assurances 3.1 and 4.1, make a written request to the Nominated Undertaker to request that the Secretary of State exercises the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property.\r\n\r\n5.2 On receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph 5.1 the Secretary of State will review the need to acquire the land in question and where he is satisfied that it is required for permanent works for Phase 2a purposes he will give notice of acquisition as soon as is reasonably practicable.\r\n\r\n5.3 In reaching a decision pursuant to paragraph 5.2 the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that necessary rights of access can be secured to the land in question.\r\n\r\n5.4 In this assurance “Petitioner” means a Petitioner who is the freehold owner and occupier of land which is the proposed subject of an agreement referred to in this assurance.\r\n","Land acquisition – Where land is occupied temporarily but the Petitioner requests the Secretary of State to acquire","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 5","2018-07-03","Assurance","Ash Tree Farm, Mill Lane, Blakenhall, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7NP","Cheshire East"]
["C93.6","N/A","HoC/0024","David, Fiona, Monty and Gwen Wright T/A H G Wright","6.1 The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to the Property, Ash Tree Farm, but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land can be identified at this stage as not being required for permanent works and is not materially changed","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 6.1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Ash Tree Farm, Mill Lane, Blakenhall, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7NP","Cheshire East"]
["C93.7","N/A","HoC/0024","David, Fiona, Monty and Gwen Wright T/A H G Wright","7.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property, Ash Tree Farm, the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the Nominated Undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n","Land acquisition - Where land cannot be identified at this stage, but it may be possible to do so following detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 7.1","2018-07-03","Assurance","Ash Tree Farm, Mill Lane, Blakenhall, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7NP","Cheshire East"]
["C93.8","N/A","HoC/0024","David, Fiona, Monty and Gwen Wright T/A H G Wright","8.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n\r\n8.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n\r\n8.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 8","2018-07-03","Assurance","Ash Tree Farm, Mill Lane, Blakenhall, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7NP","Cheshire East"]
["C93.9","N/A","HoC/0024","David, Fiona, Monty and Gwen Wright T/A H G Wright","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 1","2019-03-05","Assurance","Ash Tree Farm, Mill Lane, Blakenhall, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7NP","Cheshire East"]
["C93.10","N/A","HoC/0024","David, Fiona, Monty and Gwen Wright T/A H G Wright","2.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n2.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n2.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n2.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n2.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer\r\n\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-03-05","Assurance","Ash Tree Farm, Mill Lane, Blakenhall, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7NP","Cheshire East"]
["C93.11","N/A","HoC/0024","David, Fiona, Monty and Gwen Wright T/A H G Wright","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Ash Tree Farm, Mill Lane, Blakenhall, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 7NP","Cheshire East"]
["C94","Staffordshire Wildlife Trust","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C94.1","N/A","HoC/0091","Staffordshire Wildlife Trust","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker consult with Staffordshire Wildlife Trust with a view to identifying off-site enhancement measures to compensate for the permanent loss of 1.5ha of inland saltmarsh habitat at Lionlodge Covert LWS as identified in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill.\r\n","Lion Lodge Covert","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Kate Dewey (Staffordshire Wildlife Trust) ","2018-07-06","Assurance","Lion Lodge Covert","Stafford Borough"]
["C95","Cheshire Wildlife Trust","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C95.1","N/A","HoC/0136, AP1/0032","Cheshire Wildlife Trust","1. Within a period of 6 months following Royal Assent, the Promoter will make available to Cheshire\r\nEast Council a fund of up to £700,000 (“the Fund”) to support the identification of further local\r\nenvironmental and landscape enhancements within the administrative area of Cheshire East which are\r\nover and beyond that proposed in the Environmental Statement or proposed through detailed design\r\nand located outside Bill limits. The Fund will be released to Cheshire East following the Promoter’s\r\nreview of Cheshire East Council’s proposals in accordance with Paragraph 3.\r\n\r\n2. The Fund includes provision for any associated costs for the administration of the Fund.\r\n\r\n3. In reviewing proposals from Cheshire East submitted in accordance with Paragraph 1 the Promoter\r\nwill consider such proposals in accordance with the following conditions:\r\n- None of the proposals should impact the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n- None of the proposals should contradict any approval required for the Proposed Scheme under\r\nSchedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n- None of the proposals creating any new or significant effects than those identified in the ES\r\nand;\r\n- Ensuring the delivery of any proposals by Cheshire East meet the appropriate standards for\r\nmanaging public money,\r\n\r\nin addition to the conditions above the Promoter will continue to work with the Petitioner to agree further terms of reference for the administration of the Fund.\r\n","Additional funding for environmental enhancements within the Cheshire area","Letter From Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Rachel Giles (Cheshire Wildlife Trust), assurances 1 to 3","2018-07-09","Assurance","Cheshire","Cheshire East"]
["C95.2","N/A","HoC/0136, AP1/0032","Cheshire Wildlife Trust","In developing the site restoration plan for the proposed Checkley Lane Borrow Pit, the Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to engage with the landowner(s) to discuss opportunities for ecological enhancements.\r\n","Site restoration plan for the proposed Checkley Lane Borrow Pit","Letter From Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Rachel Giles (Cheshire Wildlife Trust)","2018-07-09","Assurance","Checkley Lane Borrow Pit","Cheshire East"]
["C95.3","N/A","HoC/0136, AP1/0032","Cheshire Wildlife Trust","The Promoter will explore with the Trust the scope for implementing ecological enhancements on the Trust’s sites, including Blakenhall Moss.\r\n","Ecological enhancements on the Trust's sites, including Blakenhall Moss","Letter From Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Rachel Giles (Cheshire Wildlife Trust)","2018-07-09","Assurance","Cheshire","Cheshire East"]
["C95.4","N/A","AP2/0058","Cheshire Wildlife Trust","1. As part of the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Promoter will undertake detailed ecological surveys of the water vole population on Swill Brook, 500 metres upstream and downstream from the proposed Half Moon inverted siphon, to inform the design of the mitigation proposed in SES2-005-002. \r\n2. Subject to the conditions in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, in the event that the surveys referred to in paragraph 1 establish that the habitat conditions on Swill Brook downstream of the proposed Half Moon inverted siphon are likely to materially adversely affect the primary function of the mitigation proposed in SES2 – 005 - 002, alternative locations to substitute for all or part of such mitigation will be sought within: \r\na. land acquired by the Promoter in the exercise of the powers of the Bill; and/or\r\nb. sites owned by Cheshire Wildlife Trust which Cheshire Wildlife Trust advises the Promoter may be suitable and agrees to make available to the Promoter for this purpose; and if no such land is available,\r\nc. land outside the Bill limits and as close as reasonably practicable to the location of the existing habitat which can be acquired on reasonable terms by agreement:\r\nand water vole may be translocated to such locations to ensure that the environmental effects of the Proposed Scheme are no worse than those reported in SES2 and AP2.\r\n3. The conditions referred to in paragraph 2a above are that the provision and/or use of any alternative location for such mitigation as provided for in paragraph 2a, and any translocation of water voles from their existing habitats thereto:\r\na. can be delivered within the powers of the Bill; \r\nb. will not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and\r\nc. can be delivered  without the need for further consents and without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n4. The conditions referred to in paragraph 2b above are that the provision and/or use of any alternative location for such mitigation as provided for in paragraph 2b, and any translocation of water voles within their existing habitats thereto:\r\na. will not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and\r\nb. can be delivered without the need for further consents and without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n5. The conditions referred to in paragraph 2c above are that the provision and/or use of any alternative location for such mitigation as provided for in paragraph 2c, and any translocation of water voles within their existing habitats thereto:\r\na. will not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and that \r\nb. all necessary consents can be obtained  for that use of the land and\r\nc. the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme is not prejudiced.\r\n6. As part of the detailed design and the construction of the Proposed Scheme, the Promoter will, subject to the conditions in paragraph 7, seek opportunities to create ditches along the construction boundary at Swill Brook to enhance water vole habitat and will implement such opportunities.\r\n7. The conditions referred to in paragraph 6 above are that the creation of the ditches:\r\na. can be delivered within the powers of the Bill; \r\nb. will not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and\r\nc. can be delivered without the need for further consents and without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement deposited with the Bill in July 2017 as amended by the SES1 and AP1 ES in March 2018 and the SES2 and AP2 ES in February 2019;  \r\n “SES2 – 005 – 002” means the amendment to the environmental mitigation around Half Moon inverted siphon to enhance the habitats for water vole in the local area, as described in paragraphs 2.2.25 to 2.2.28 of the SES2 and AP2 ES Volume 2, Community Area 5;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Environmental mitigation for water vole ","Letter From Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Rachel Giles (Cheshire Wildlife Trust), assurances 1 to 7","2019-05-13","Assurance","Cheshire","Cheshire East"]
["C95.5","N/A","AP2/0058","Cheshire Wildlife Trust","1. As part of detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Promoter will undertake detailed ecological surveys of the water vole population on Swill Brook, 500 metres upstream and downstream from the proposed Half Moon inverted siphon, to inform the design of the mitigation proposed in SES2-005-002. \r\n2. Subject to the conditions in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, in the event that the surveys referred to in paragraph 1 establish that the habitat conditions on Swill Brook downstream of the proposed Half Moon inverted siphon are likely to materially adversely affect the primary function of the mitigation proposed in SES2–005 -002, alternative locations to substitute for all or part of such mitigation will be sought within: \r\n(a)          land acquired by the Promoter in the exercise of the powers of the Bill; and/or\r\n(b)          sites owned by Cheshire Wildlife Trust, which Cheshire Wildlife Trust advises the Promoter may be suitable and agrees to make available to the Promoter for this purpose; \r\nor, if no such land is available,\r\n(c)          land outside the Bill limits and as close as reasonably practicable to the location of the existing habitat which can be acquired on reasonable terms by agreement;  \r\nand water vole may be translocated to such locations to ensure that the environmental effects of the Proposed Scheme are no worse than those reported in SES2 and AP2.\r\n3. The conditions referred to in paragraph 2a above are that the provision and/or use of any alternative location for such mitigation, as provided for in 2a, and any translocation of water voles from their existing habitats thereto:\r\na.\tcan be delivered within the powers of the Bill;\r\nb.\twill not give rise to any new of different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and  \r\nc.\tcan be delivered without the need for further consents and without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n4. The conditions referred to in paragraph 2b above are that the provision and/or use of any alternative location for such mitigation as provided for in 2b, and any translocation of water voles from their existing habitats thereto:\r\na.\twill not give rise to any new or different significant effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and\r\nb.\tcan be delivered without the need for further consents and without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n5.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 2c above are that the provision and/or use of any alternative location for such mitigation as provided for in 2c, and any translocation of water voles from their existing habitats thereto:\r\na.\twill not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and that \r\nb.\tall necessary consents can be obtained for that use of the land; and\r\nc.\tthe safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme is not prejudiced.\r\n6. As part of the detailed design and the construction of the Proposed Scheme, the Promoter will, subject to the conditions in paragraph 7, seek opportunities to create ditches along the construction boundary at Swill Brook to enhance water vole habitat and will implement such opportunities.\r\n7. The conditions referred to in paragraph 6 above are that the creation of the ditches:\r\na.\tcan be delivered within the powers of the Bill;\r\nb.\twill not give rise to any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and\r\nc.\tcan be delivered without the need for further consents and without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.  \r\n8. In fulfilling this assurance, the Promoter will continue to engage with Cheshire Wildlife Trust and with Natural England, and will discuss the detail of the Promoter’s proposals for mitigating the impacts of the Proposed Scheme on the water vole habitat at Swill Brook with Cheshire Wildlife Trust before seeking appropriate consents from Natural England to implement them.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement deposited with the Bill in July 2017 as amended by the SES1 and AP1 ES in March 2018 and the SES2 and AP2 ES in February 2019;   \r\n“SES2–005–002” means the amendment to the environmental mitigation around Half Moon inverted siphon to enhance the habitats for water vole in the local area, as described in paragraphs 2.2.25 to 2.2.28 of the SES2 and AP2 ES Volume 2, Community Area 5.\r\n","Environmental mitigation for water vole ","Letter From Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Rachel Giles (Cheshire Wildlife Trust), assurances 1 to 8","2019-08-01","Assurance","Cheshire","Cheshire East"]
["C96","Williams, Toby & Bonnie and Alrewas Hayes Events and A J & E B Gilmour","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C96.1","N/A","HoC/0020","Toby & Bonnie Williams, Alrewas Hayes Events & A J & E B Gilmour","\r\nThe Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to re-route the Phase 2a Construction Traffic illustrated with a Blue Line on the Plan at the Petitioner’s Property for the purposes of limiting any disruption created by the Works to the Petitioner’s use of the Property as a wedding venue.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n“the Plan” means sheet No. 1-03 as deposited with the Bill and attached to this assurance [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n\r\n“the Property” means Alrewas Hayes, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire DE13 7DL;\r\n","Access during construction","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company)","2018-07-12","Assurance","The access illustrated with a Blue Line on the Plan at the Petitioner’s Property as attached to the letter\r\n\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C96.2","N/A","HoC/0020","Toby & Bonnie Williams, Alrewas Hayes Events & A J & E B Gilmour","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), assurance 1","2019-02-19","Assurance","Alrewas Hayes, Burton on Trent, Staffs DE13 7DL\r\n\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C96.3","N/A","HoC/0020","Toby & Bonnie Williams, Alrewas Hayes Events & A J & E B Gilmour","2.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n2.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n2.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), assurances 2.1 to 2.3","2019-02-19","Assurance","Alrewas Hayes, Burton on Trent, Staffs DE13 7DL\r\n\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C96.4","N/A","HoC/0020","Toby & Bonnie Williams, Alrewas Hayes Events & A J & E B Gilmour","3.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n3.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.3 The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n3.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n3.5 As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), assurances 3.1 to 3.6","2019-02-19","Assurance","Alrewas Hayes, Burton on Trent, Staffs DE13 7DL\r\n\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C96.5","N/A","HoC/0020","Toby & Bonnie Williams, Alrewas Hayes Events & A J & E B Gilmour","4.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of  State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n4.2  The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 4.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n4.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n4.2.2  seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n4.3  In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n4.4  Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n\r\n","Detailed design ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), assurances 4.1 to 4.4","2019-02-19","Assurance","Alrewas Hayes, Burton on Trent, Staffs DE13 7DL\r\n\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C96.6","N/A","HoC/0020","Toby & Bonnie Williams, Alrewas Hayes Events & A J & E B Gilmour","5.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n•\ta pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n•\ta target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n•\ta method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n•\tadvice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n•\trecommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n•\tadvice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n•\tadvice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n•\ta schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 5.2) \r\n•\tfollowing completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n•\ta final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n5.2  Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 5.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n5.3  The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n5.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n\r\n","Agricultural soils ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), assurances 5.1 to 5.4","2019-02-19","Assurance","Alrewas Hayes, Burton on Trent, Staffs DE13 7DL\r\n\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C96.6","N/A","HoC/0020","Toby & Bonnie Williams, Alrewas Hayes Events & A J & E B Gilmour","5.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n•\ta pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n•\ta target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n•\ta method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n•\tadvice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n•\trecommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n•\tadvice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n•\tadvice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n•\ta schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 5.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n•\ta final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n5.2  Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 5.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n5.3  The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n5.4 The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n\r\n","Agricultural soils ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), assurances 5.1 to 5.4","2019-02-19","Assurance","Alrewas Hayes, Burton on Trent, Staffs DE13 7DL\r\n\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C96.7","N/A","HoC/0020","Toby & Bonnie Williams, Alrewas Hayes Events & A J & E B Gilmour","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3  where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Alrewas Hayes, Burton on Trent, Staffs DE13 7DL\r\n\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C97","Little Ingestre Care Limited","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C97.1","N/A","AP1/0024","Little Ingestre Care Limited","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in exercising the powers under the Bill not to prevent vehicular access including emergency service access to Ingestre from Hoo Mill crossroads via Ingestre Park Road in all reasonably foreseeable circumstances.\r\n","Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Abigail Walters (Shakespeare Martineau). Access.  ","2018-07-13","Assurance","Vehicular access to Ingestre from Hoo Mill crossroads via Ingestre Park Road","Stafford Borough"]
["C97.2","N/A","AP1/0024","Little Ingestre Care Limited","1.1.The Promoter will work with the Care Home’s specialist acoustic adviser to carry out any necessary assessments to develop a Trigger Action Plan setting out reasonably practicable measures to be adopted for management and, as necessary, mitigation of likely construction noise impacts arising from the HS2 works whether at source or at the Care Home and whether required in advance of or during the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.2. The Promoter will seek to agree with the Care Homes specialist acoustics adviser a final version of the Trigger Action Plan to be implemented jointly by the Promoter and the Care Home during construction of the HS2 works.\r\n1.3. The Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to ensure that the Trigger Action Plan referred to in clause 1.1 above addresses the following minimum requirements:\r\n1.3.1. the form and regularity of engagement between the Nominated Undertaker, the Care Home and the Care Home’s technical advisors;\r\n1.3.2. the respective roles of the Nominated Undertaker and the Care Home’s in the implementation of the Trigger Action Plan;\r\n1.3.3. definitions of Trigger Action Levels;\r\n1.3.4. reasonable protocols to be applied to manage risks of an exceedance of the Trigger Action Levels during construction activities and any necessary interactions with the Promoter;\r\n1.3.5.\tactions and procedures to be implemented in the event that the Trigger Action Levels are exceeded;\r\n1.3.6.\tnoise monitoring arrangements;\r\n1.3.7. provisions for audio-capture capability in the noise monitoring equipment specification;\r\n1.3.8. The provision of mitigation measures, if any, required to be implemented in advance of construction of the Proposed Scheme in light of assessment carried out under the Trigger Action Plan.\r\n1.4. In the event that the parties are unable to agree a final version of the Trigger Action Plan within 28 days of the Promoter being provided by the Care Home with a draft Trigger Action Plan, then either party may refer the matter to the Secretary of State who will instruct a Competent Person to finalise the said plan. \r\n1.5. The implementation of any measures identified in pursuance of the assurance will be subject to:\r\n1.5.1. The Nominated Undertaker obtaining any necessary consents from the appropriate statutory bodies which it will use reasonable endeavours to obtain as soon as reasonably practicable \r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Competent Person” means an independent person who is appropriately qualified to finalise the programme of works and/or the Trigger Action Plan referred to in clause 1 and who is to be appointed by agreement between the Nominated Undertaker and the Care Home, or in default of such agreement, is nominated by the President of the Institute of Acoustics.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Trigger Action Plan","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Abigail Walters (Shakespeare Martineau) assurance 1","2018-07-17","Assurance","Little Ingestre House Care Home,  Ingestre Park, Great Haywood, Stafford, ST18 0RE\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C97.3","N/A","AP1/0024","Little Ingestre Care Limited","2.1.\tDuring commissioning of, and following the introduction of services for passenger use on the HS2 railway, the Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to carry out noise monitoring at the Care Home in accordance with the commitments set out in HS2 Phase 2a Information Paper E12: Operational noise and vibration monitoring framework and share with the Care Home the monitoring data gathered.  If necessary actions may reasonably be taken to reduce the effect, in line with HS2 Phase 2a Information Paper E9: Control of airborne noise, then the Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to undertake such corrective actions to reduce operational noise effects, having regard to the need to reduce so far as reasonably practicable any strong tonal, impulsive or intermittent characteristics.","Operation ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Abigail Walters (Shakespeare Martineau), assurance 2","2018-07-17","Assurance"," Little Ingestre House Care Home,  Ingestre Park, Great Haywood, Stafford, ST18 0RE\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C97.4","N/A","AP1/0024","Little Ingestre Care Limited","3.1.\tThe Promoter will pay or require the Nominated Undertaker to pay, within 30 days of a request that complies with the requirements of clause 3.2, the reasonable and properly incurred costs and expenses of such noise specialist and/or other specialist advisor(s) as the Care Home may reasonably require to advise it in relation to the implementation of the Promoter’s obligations under this assurance. \r\n3.2.\tClause 3.1 is subject to:\r\n3.2.1.\tthe Nominated Undertaker's prior approval of such costs (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed);\r\n3.2.2.\tthe submission of receipts for costs so approved including such further detail and/or evidence as the Promoter may reasonably require; and\r\n3.2.3.\tthe Care Home and its relevant advisor(s) seeking to mitigate any costs for which recovery is sought, as far as is reasonable and proportionate.\r\n3.3.\tAny mitigation works provided under paragraph 1 or 2 of this assurance will be provided at the expense of the Promoter.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\r\n\"the Care Home\" means Little Ingestre House Care Home,  Ingestre Park, Great Haywood, Stafford, ST18 0RE;\r\n\r\n\r\n","Costs","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Abigail Walters (Shakespeare Martineau), assurance 3","2018-07-17","Assurance","Little Ingestre House Care Home,  Ingestre Park, Great Haywood, Stafford, ST18 0RE\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C97.5","N/A","AP1/0024","Little Ingestre Care Limited","The Promoter will, in the construction of the Proposed Scheme, require the nominated undertaker to limit to two storeys the external elevation of any temporary buildings erected within the Trent North Utility Compound.\r\n","Compound Height","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Abigail Walters (Shakespeare Martineau),  assurance 1","2019-02-08","Assurance","Little Ingestre House Care Home,  Ingestre Park, Great Haywood, Stafford, ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C97.6","N/A","AP1/0024","Little Ingestre Care Limited","The Promoter will engage with the Petitioner in relation to any hoarding to be erected at the Trent North Utility Compound and will allow the Petitioner reasonable opportunity to comment on the emerging design before it is finalised. In designing any hoarding to be erected at the Trent North Utility Compound, the Promoter will take into account the setting and the need for the hoarding to be sympathetic to the setting.\r\n\r\n","Hoarding \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Abigail Walters (Shakespeare Martineau), assurance 2","2019-02-08","Assurance","Little Ingestre House Care Home,  Ingestre Park, Great Haywood, Stafford, ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C97.7","N/A","AP2/0074","Little Ingestre Care Limited","1.1\tThe Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner in reviewing the impacts of the AP2 Construction Works during the AP2 Construction Period on the Petitioner and the residents of the Property.\r\n1.2\tThe Property has a maximum capacity of 15 residents.  Should a reduction in resident numbers of 3 or more occur for a period of one month or more in the AP2 Construction Period due to the impact of the AP2 Construction Works, the nominated undertaker will engage with the Petitioner and consider what reasonable adjustments can be provided for the benefit of the residents of the Property as required under the Equality Act, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.3.\r\n1.3\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.2 are:  \r\n1.3.1\tas soon as is reasonably practicable during the AP2 Construction Period, the Petitioner provides all necessary information in terms of accounts, resident numbers, and any other information as may reasonably be requested by the nominated undertaker in assessing any reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act;\r\n1.3.2\tthe Petitioner can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the nominated undertaker that it continues to manage the business at the Property in a normal commercial manner;  \r\n1.3.3\tthe Petitioner can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the nominated undertaker that all reasonable efforts to fill any resident vacancies arising in order to mitigate any business losses have been taken; and\r\n1.3.4\tany reasonable adjustments can be made without prejudicing the safety, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“ the AP2 Construction Works” means AP2-002-010 and AP2-002-009 detailed in the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Supplementary Environmental Statement 2 and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report;\r\n“the AP2 Construction Period” means the period from commencement of AP2 Construction Works until 6 months following completion of the AP2 Construction Works;\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill; \r\n“the Equality Act” means the Equality Act 2010 as amended; \r\n “the Petitioner” means Little Ingestre Care Home Limited; \r\n“the Property” means Little Ingestre Care Home, Ingestre Park Road, Ingrestre, Stafford; \r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","AP2 Construction Impacts \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Abigail Walters (Shakespeare Martineau), assurance 1 ","2019-04-26","Assurance","Little Ingestre House Care Home,  Ingestre Park, Great Haywood, Stafford, ST18 0RE","Stafford Borough"]
["C98","Royal Society for Wildlife Trust, The","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C98.1","N/A","HoC/0180","The Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts","1. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to commit to fulfilling, so far as reasonably practicable, the Project Objective, and will do this through adopting appropriate means to include:\r\ni. to monitor and report against the no net loss calculation during the construction of the Proposed Scheme and to liaise with Natural England in this regard;\r\nii. to propose and/or create, so far as reasonably practicable and appropriate, habitats, either as an alternative means of providing habitat to those areas identified in the Bill or as a means of providing additional mitigation reasonably required to fulfil the Project Objective;\r\niii. to seek and have due regard to reasonable and appropriate proposals from members of the Ecological Review Group and other appropriate organisations or stakeholders, for the provision of specific locations for off-site habitat enhancement; and,\r\niv. to seek and have due regard to reasonable and appropriate proposals from members of the Ecological Review Group and other appropriate organisations or stakeholders, for the provision of specific locations for off-site habitat creation.\r\n2. Paragraphs iii and iv above are subject to the following conditions:\r\n(a) the Nominated Undertaker being satisfied that the additional habitat creation or habitat enhancement can be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n(b) the Nominated Undertaker securing any and all necessary consents and agreements for delivering and maintaining the additional habitat creation or habitat enhancement; and\r\n(c) the Nominated Undertaker being of the view that the additional habitat creation or habitat enhancement can be delivered without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.","Habitat creation and habitat enhancement","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Sue Young, assurances 1 and 2","2018-07-06","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C98.2","N/A","HoL/0026","The Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts","Following Royal Assent of the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to enhance its existing No Net Loss objective, by identifying and implementing appropriate opportunities, where it is reasonably practicable, to move towards net gains in biodiversity. This will include consultation with relevant stakeholders, including the Petitioner and the HS2 Phase 2a Ecology Review Group\r\n"," No Net Loss objective","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Ms K Hawkins, assurance 1 ","2020-08-27","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C99","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C99.1","N/A","HoC/0168","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families","1. Relocation of material stockpile\r\n1.1 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 the Secretary of State will not exercise the powers conferred by the Bill over the Material Stockpile Land for the purposes of provision of temporary material stockpiles but instead shall use the Replacement Land for such purposes.\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n1.2.1 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the relocation of the temporary material stockpiles to the Replacement Land can be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n1.2.2 the Secretary of State secures any necessary planning permission, consents and approvals for the use of the Replacement Land for such purpose of the date nine months from the date of Royal Assent to the Bill (the Promoter having used reasonable endeavours to secure such planning permission, consents and approvals as necessary within this timescale) ;\r\n1.2.3 the Replacement Land being sufficient to accommodate the temporary material stockpiles intended for the Material Stockpile Land;\r\n1.2.4 the specific Petitioners who own the Replacement Land enter into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n1.2.4.1\tgrants any and all necessary rights over the Replacement Land sufficient to enable the Secretary of State to use that land for a temporary material stockpile(s); and\r\n1.2.4.2\tprovides that the consideration payable to the Petitioners for using the Replacement Land for a temporary material stockpile shall be calculated as if the Secretary of State had done so in exercise of powers in the Bill.\r\n1.3 Nothing in this assurance 1 shall prevent the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred by the Bill over the Material Stockpile Land:\r\n1.3.1 for the purposes of the Hopton North Cutting Satellite Compound, worksite provision and access for construction; or\r\n1.3.2 for the purposes of temporary material stockpiles:\r\n1.3.2.1\tin the event that the conditions in paragraph 1.2 are not satisfied;\r\nor \r\n1.3.2.2\tto the extent that the Replacement Land is insufficient to\r\naccommodate the temporary material stockpiles.\r\n1.4 Subject to the conditions in 1.5, the Promoter will relocate the compound known as the Hopton North Cutting Satellite Compound as close to the railway as reasonably practicable:.\r\n1.5 The conditions in 1.4 are:\r\n1.5.1 the proposed relocation can be accommodated within the existing powers of the Bill and does not require any additional land or powers to those currently provided for within the Bill;\r\n1.5.2 the proposed relocation does not give rise to any new or significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill; and\r\n1.5.3 the Replacement Land is sufficient to accommodate all of the temporary material stockpiles.\r\n","Agricultural Use","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP),  assurance 1","2018-07-16","Assurance","New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH","Stafford Borough"]
["C99.2","N/A","HoC/0168","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families","2.1 Other than in emergency or unforeseen circumstances, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker in exercise of the Bill Powers not to restrict pedestrian access to and egress from the Herdsman’s Cottage, and to use reasonable endeavours not to restrict vehicular access and egress from the Herdsman’s Cottage, during the construction of the Proposed Scheme in the vicinity of the Herdsman’s Cottage.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\"the Herdsman's Cottage\"  means the residential building within Plot 179\r\n\"Proposed Scheme\" means Phase 2a of HS2\r\n","Herdsman's cottage - means the residential building within Plot 179","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch(Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 2","2018-07-16","Assurance","New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH","Stafford Borough"]
["C99.3","N/A","HoC/0168","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families","3.1 If at the date when it is proposed to implement the powers of the Bill in relation to the Property the Secretary of State is satisfied, in the light of detailed design of the project, that any part of the property will not be required for the accommodation of any permanent works authorised by the Bill the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to that part of the Property but instead the nominated undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedules 15 and 16 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n3.2 This assurance is subject to agreement, in a form acceptable to the Secretary of State, as to the level of compensation payable in respect of the exercise of the temporary powers of the Bill in advance of the nominated undertaker taking temporary possession of the Property.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Property” means such of the Petitioners’ land as is within the limits of land to be acquired or used (as defined in clause 60(1) of the Bill) and shown, for indicative purposes, on the Protected Land Plan;\r\n“Plot 179” means the parcel of land identified as such in the Parish of Hopton and Coton as shown on Sheet No. 1-32 of the deposited plans and sections (as defined in clause 60(1) of the Bill);","Land Acquisition","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 3","2018-07-16","Assurance","New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH","Stafford Borough"]
["C99.4","N/A","HoC/0168","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families","4.1 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 4.2 being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to provide for the realignment of the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 12 Diversion on an alignment which brings the Diversion to more closely follow the field boundaries in the area as shown indicatively on the Plan.\r\n4.2 Any alternative alignment must satisfy the following conditions:\r\n4.2.1 the Secretary of State being satisfied the alternative alignment would meet prevailing design standards and could be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n4.2.2 the Alternative Bridleway Alignment does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n 4.2.2.1\tthe Secretary of State being satisfied that any move in alignment can be delivered within the existing powers of the Bill and without the need for any additional land from that identified on the deposited plans as within the limits of land to be acquired or used for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n4.2.2.2\tfor any part of the proposed move in alignment which falls outside the limits of lateral deviation for the relevant bridleway as shown on the deposited plans, the local highway authority agreeing to use its powers to provide for such part to be created as a bridleway and accepting future maintenance responsibility;\r\nor:\r\n4.2.2.3\tfor any part of the alternative alignment within the Petitioners’ Land but outside the land identified on the deposited plans as within the limits of land to be acquired or used for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme, the Petitioners securing the creation of the alternative alignment as a bridleway and/or the local highway authority agreeing to use its powers to provide for the alternative alignment to be created as a bridleway and accepting future maintenance responsibility.\r\n","Realignment of Bridleway Diversion","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 4","2018-07-16","Assurance","New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH","Stafford Borough"]
["C99.5","N/A","HoC/0168","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families","5.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of changes to the likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project\r\n","Engagement with the petitioners","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 5","2018-07-16","Assurance","New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH","Stafford Borough"]
["C99.6","N/A","HoC/0168","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families","6.1 The Secretary of State will take steps in the exercise of the powers of the Bill in order to secure a pedestrian and vehicular right of way for the benefit of the owner and occupier of the Triangle Land along the access road comprised in Work No. 56A to and from the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 11 Accommodation Overbridge to enable the owner and occupier of the Triangle Land to access the Triangle Land from the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 11 Accommodation Overbridge.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Triangle Land” means that part of the Petitioners’ land shown shaded blue on the Plan [attached to beneficiary letter] to the south of Kent’s Barn Farm and the Bridleway Hopton and Coton 12 and to the north of the high speed railway.","Accommodation Access to severed land","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 6","2018-07-16","Assurance","New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH","Stafford Borough"]
["C99.7","N/A","HoC/0168","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families","7.1 The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to engage with the relevant utility companies in order to reduce any disturbance caused by utility works as part of the Proposed Scheme at the Property as far as reasonably practicable.\r\n","Engagement with the Petitioner in relation to Utilities Works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 7","2018-07-16","Assurance","New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH","Stafford Borough"]
["C99.8","N/A","HoC/0168","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families","8.1 Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 8.2, the Secretary of State will use reasonable endeavours to obtain powers to provide an integrated earth bund and noise barrier (providing equivalent noise attenuation functionality to that of a 3m above track noise barrier) of approximately 825m to be positioned on the western side of Work No. 48 between the northern end of the Hopton North Cutting and the Marston Bridleway 8 Accommodation Overbridge as shown indicatively on the Plan ('the New Bund”) and to provide for the realignment of the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 16 Diversion on an alignment which follows the outer limit of the New Bund as shown indicatively on the Plan ('the Alternative Bridleway Diversion”).\r\n8.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 8.1 which must be satisfied by the date 9 months from the date of Royal Assent to the Bill are that:\r\n8.2.1 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Alternative Bridleway Diversion would meet prevailing design standards and could be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill; \r\n8.2.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the local planning or highway authority with responsibility for the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 16 Diversion does not have any objections to the construction of the Alternative Bridleway Alignment and will both agree to use its powers to provide for the creation of the bridleway (as necessary) and accept future maintenance responsibility;\r\n8.2.3 the Alternative Bridleway Alignment and the New Bund do not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n8.2.4 any necessary approvals required under the Bill being given by the Local Planning and Local Highway Authorities;\r\n8.2.5 the Petitioners granting the Promoter all necessary entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n8.2.5.1\tgrants any and all necessary rights over any land outside the land identified on the deposited plans as within the limits of land to be acquired or used for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme sufficient to enable the Secretary of State to construct and maintain the New Bund; and\r\n8.2.5.2\tprovides that the consideration payable to the Petitioners for using this land for the New Bund shall be calculated as if the Secretary of State had done so in exercise of powers in the Bill\r\n8.2.6 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the proposed grassland habitat between the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 16 and the high speed railway and the proposed landscape mitigation planting between the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 16 Diversion and the high speed railway shown on CT-06-217 (being land which may be required for the New Bund), can be delivered elsewhere within the Proposed Scheme and/or accommodated within the New Bund without giving rise to any new or different significant adverse environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n8.2.7 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Alternative Bridleway Alignment will not impact on any public rights of way other than the Hopton and Colton Bridleway 16; and\r\n8.2.8 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Alternative Bridleway Alignment will not impact on any existing private means of access or new accommodation access, other than those used solely by the Petitioner, is impacted by the proposal.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Petitioners” means:\r\n· Stephen Brandon, New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n· Lesley Brandon, New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n· H Brandon & Sons, New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n· James Muir, New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n· Lucy Muir, New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n· Muir Farming Limited, New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n· Michael Williams, The Waddens, Weston, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST18 0HW.\r\n· Elizabeth Williams, The Waddens, Weston, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST18 0HW.\r\n· Katherine Kingsley, The Byre, 38 Main Street, Orton on the Hill, Atherstone, CV9 3NN.\r\n· Matthew Williams, Hopton Farm, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n· Hopton Farming Partnership, The Waddens, Weston, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST18 0HW.\r\n· John Baker (as trustee of the K E Brandon Will Trust), c/o Mrs A Croft, The Priory, 6 Bull Ring, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 5HS.\r\n· Doreen Baker (as trustee of the K E Brandon Will Trust), c/o Mrs A Croft, The Priory, 6 Bull Ring, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 5HS.\r\n· Annabel Croft (as beneficiary of the K E Brandon Will Trust), c/o Mrs A Croft, The Priory, 6 Bull Ring, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 5HS.\r\n· Caroline Edwards (as beneficiary of the K E Brandon Will Trust), c/o Mrs A Croft, The Priory, 6 Bull Ring, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 5HS.\r\n\r\n","Noise Attenuation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 8","2018-07-16","Assurance","New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH","Stafford Borough"]
["C99.9","N/A","HoC/0168","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families","9.1 In this assurance:\r\n“Protected Land Owner” means the owner of the Protected Land;\r\n“the Developer” means Maximus Strategic Stafford LLP; and\r\n“Protected Land” means that land shaded grey and hatched red on the Protected Land Plan being land subject to the Planning Application.\r\n9.2 Subject to the Developer and Protected Land Owner first covenanting with the Promoter and the Local Planning Authority, in a form satisfactory to the Promoter, to restrict any development of the Protected Land pursuant to the Planning Permission in such a way so that the Promoter is satisfied that the development would not conflict with the Proposed Scheme, the Promoter will secure the withdrawal of the objection to the Planning Application made by High Speed Two (HS2) Limited on 24 May 2018 under the HS2 Phase 2a safeguarding directions issued by the Secretary of State for Transport on 27 September 2017.\r\n\r\n","Planning Permission","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 9","2018-07-16","Assurance","New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH","Stafford Borough"]
["C99.10","N/A","HoC/0168","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families"," 1.1 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 the Secretary of State will not exercise the powers conferred by the Bill over the Material Stockpile Land for the purposes of provision of temporary material stockpiles but instead shall use the Replacement Land for such purposes.\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n1.2.1 The Secretary of State is satisfied that the relocation of the temporary material stockpiles to the Replacement Land can be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n1.2.2 The Secretary of State secures any necessary planning permission, consents and approvals for the use of the Replacement Land for such purpose of the date nine months from the date of Royal Assent to the Bill (the Promoter having used reasonable endeavours to secure such planning permission, consents and approvals as necessary within this timescale);\r\n1.2.3 The Replacement Land being sufficient to accommodate the temporary material stockpiles intended for the Material Stockpile Land;\r\n1.2.4 The specific Petitioners who own the Replacement Land enter into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n1.2.4.1\tGrants any and all necessary rights over the Replacement Land sufficient to enable the Secretary of State to use that land for a temporary material stockpile(s); and\r\n1.2.4.2\tprovides that the consideration payable to the Petitioners for using the Replacement Land for a temporary material stockpile shall be calculated as if the Secretary of State had done so in exercise of powers in the Bill.\r\n1.3 Nothing in this assurance 1 shall prevent the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred by the Bill over the Material Stockpile Land:\r\n1.3.1 for the purposes of the Hopton North Cutting Satellite Compound, worksite provision and access for construction; or\r\n1.3.2 For the purposes of temporary material stockpiles: \t\r\n1.3.2.1\tin the event that the conditions in paragraph 1.2 are not satisfied; or\r\n1.3.2.2\tto the extent that the Replacement Land is insufficient to accommodate the temporary material stockpiles.\r\n1.4 Subject to the conditions in 1.5, the Promoter will relocate the compound known as the Hopton North Cutting Satellite Compound as close to the railway as reasonably practicable.\r\n1.5 The conditions in 1.4 are:\r\n 1.5.1 The proposed relocation can be accommodated within the existing powers of the Bill and does not require any additional land or powers to those currently provided for within the Bill;\r\n1.5.2 The proposed relocation does not give rise to any new or significantenvironmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill; and\r\n1.5.3 The Replacement Land is sufficient to accommodate all of the temporary material stockpiles.\r\n1.6 Where the Replacement Land is used by the Promoter for the purposes of provision of temporary material stockpiles then the Replacement Land shall be reinstated as if the land had been occupied under Schedule 16 to the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Material Stockpile Land” means that land within Plot 96 identified for the provision of temporary material stockpiles as shown indicatively on plan CT-05-217;\r\n“Replacement Land” means land within the Petitioner’s ownership which is suitable to be used for temporary material stockpiles and which may include the Triangle Land;\r\n“Triangle Land” means that part of the Petitioners’ land shown shaded blue on the Plan to the south of Kent’s Barn Farm and the Bridleway Hopton and Coton 12 and to the north of the high speed railway.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Material stockpile","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 1","2019-01-29","Assurance","New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH, specifically that land within Plot 96 identified for the provision of temporary material stockpiles as shown indicatively on plan CT-05-217 and the land within the Petitioner’s ownership which is suitable to be used for temporary material stockpiles and which may include that part of the Petitioners’ land shown shaded blue on the Plan (attached to the assurance) to the south of Kent’s Barn Farm and the Bridleway Hopton and Coton 12 and to the north of the high speed railway.","Stafford Borough"]
["C99.11","N/A","HoC/0168","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families","1.1 The Secretary of State will use reasonable endeavours to promote an Additional Provision to the Bill conferring upon the Promoter the power to relocate the Balancing Pond, Environmental Mitigation and Associated Access from Plot 70.\r\n1.2 Subject to the successful promotion of the Additional Provision in 1.1 above, the Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition of the Bill over Plot 70 for the purposes of the Balancing Pond, Environmental Mitigation and Associated Access save that the nominated undertaker may exercise the powers of the Bill to take temporary possession of Plot 70 during the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Associated Access” means the access to the Balancing Pond off Sandon Road on Plot 70 in the Parish of Hopton and Coton as shown on plan CT-06-216 which is proposed to be relocated under an Additional Provision;\r\n“Balancing Pond” means the balancing pond to be located off Sandon Road on Plot 70 in the Parish of Hopton and Coton as shown on plan CT-06-216 which is proposed to be relocated under an Additional Provision;\r\n“Environmental Mitigation” means the environmental mitigation to be located around the Balancing Pond on Plot 70 in the Parish of Hopton and Coton as shown on plan CT-06-216 which is proposed to be relocated under an Additional Provision; and\r\n“Plot 70” means Plot 70 in the Parish of Hopton and Coton as on plan 1-31.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Relocation of Balancing Pond, Environmental Mitigation and Associated Access ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr McCulloch (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP), assurance 2","2019-01-29","Assurance","New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH, ","Stafford Borough"]
["C99.12","N/A","AP2/0077","Brandon, Williams and Muir Families"," 1. Subject to the conditions in paragraph 2 below, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to review the Environmental Mitigation with the aim of relocating part of the Environmental Mitigation to the Drainage Infrastructure Land in order to reduce the amount of Environmental Mitigation on the Land so far as reasonably practicable to maximise the availability of the Land for agricultural use.  In reviewing the Environmental Mitigation relocation in this assurance, the nominated undertaker shall use reasonable endeavours to prioritise relocating the Environmental Mitigation at the Pink Land.\r\n 2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 above are:\r\na. that the Promoter is satisfied that the Drainage Infrastructure is not required as part of the Proposed Scheme;\r\nb. that any relocation or reduction of the Environmental Mitigation does not give rise to any new or different significant effects to those assessed in the Environmental Statement;\r\nc. that any relocation or reduction of the Environmental Mitigation can be accommodated within the powers and limits of the Bill and is approved by the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\nd. that any relocation or reduction of the Environmental Mitigation can be accommodated within the construction programme for the Proposed Scheme;\r\ne. that any relocation or reduction of the Environmental Mitigation does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:-   \r\n “the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n “Drainage Infrastructure” means the permanent drainage solution proposed under Additional Provision 2 to the Bill as shown edged purple on the Plan; \r\n “Drainage Infrastructure Land” means the land shown edged purple on the Plan containing the proposed Drainage Infrastructure; \r\n “Environmental Mitigation” means the proposed environmental mitigation at the Land illustrated on the Plan marked Blue and Pink;\r\n “the Environmental Statement”  means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n “the Land” means the Pink and Blue Land on the Plan;  \r\n “the Plan” means Bill plan CT-06-216;\r\n “Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.","Environmental Mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Charles Meynell, (Fisher German LLP), assurance 1 to 2","2019-04-30","Assurance","New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH\r\n \r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C100","Cycling UK","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C100.1","N/A","HoC/0103","Cycling UK","1. The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to:\r\na. engage with Cycle Proofing Working Group during the detailed design stage of the Proposed Scheme. Such engagement will include, but not be limited to consideration of :\r\n- the potential to provide cycling access along the broad corridor of the route of the Proposed Scheme\r\n- the potential for cycle proofing of highways to be constructed or altered as part of the Proposed Scheme, particularly with regards to surfacing and gradients\r\n","Engagement with Cycle Proofing Working Group","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Geffen, assurance 1","2018-07-16","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C100.2","N/A","HoC/0103","Cycling UK","2. The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to:\r\na. have due regard to the principles of the relevant up-to-date cycling standards and guidance\r\nb. use reasonable endeavours to design and implement temporary traffic management arrangements in accordance with the standards set out in the HS2 Phase 1/2a Route-wide Traffic Management Plan, which includes consideration of \"Cyclists at Roadworks\"\r\n","Cycling Standards and Guidance","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Geffen, assurance 2","2018-07-16","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C100.3","N/A","HoC/0103","Cycling UK","3. The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to construct that part of Work No. 72 shown coloured purple on plan 1 attached to this assurance to a standard that would enable it to be used as a bridleway in the future if required.\r\nFor the avoidance of doubt:\r\na. the nominated undertaker shall not be responsible for any consents required to re-designate the footpath along the access road or any part of it as a bridleway;\r\nb. nothing in this assurance shall require the nominated undertaker to alter the existing bridge over the M6 motorway (including its parapets).\r\n\r\n","Footpath Swynnerton 27 Replacement Sheet No 1-41","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Geffen, assurance 3","2018-07-16","Assurance","Borough of Stafford","Stafford Borough"]
["C100.4","N/A","HoC/0103","Cycling UK","4. The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to\r\na. construct that part of Work No. 49 shown coloured purple on plan 2 attached to this assurance to a standard that would enable it to be used as a bridleway if required in the future; and\r\nb. reduce the gradient along the route between points P3, Work No 49A, P1, Work No 49 (part) and point P2 shown on plan 2 to a gradient of 5% or less. For the avoidance of doubt, the nominated undertaker shall not be responsible for any consents required to change the designation of the footpath constructed to a bridleway standard in the above assurance as a bridleway.\r\n","Footpath Tixall 0.1630 (b) Replacement Sheet No 1-28","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Geffen, assurance 4","2018-07-16","Assurance","Borough of Stafford","Stafford Borough"]
["C100.5","N/A","HoC/0103","Cycling UK","5. Subject to a successful promotion of an Additional Provision, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to construct a new bridleway and bridleway bridge along the route between points P6, P7, Work No. 53 and point P8 shown coloured purple on plan 3 attached to this assurance.\r\nThe above assurances are subject to the following conditions:\r\na. where relevant, approvals of the planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\nb. that none of the works associated with the above assurances\r\n- result in creating any new or different environmental effects than those reported in the Environmental Statement; or any supplementary environmental statement\r\n- prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme\r\nThe Secretary of State will not object to any re-designations of public rights of way sought in relation to Assurances 3 and 4 above.\r\n","Bridleway over Work No. 53 in Hopton and Coton - Replacement Sheet No 1-","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Geffen, assurance 5","2018-07-16","Assurance","Borough of Stafford","Stafford Borough"]
["C100.6","N/A","HoC/0103","Cycling UK","6. The Secretary of State shall pay to Cycling UK up to and not exceeding the amount of £15,000 for the obtaining by Cycling UK the re-designations referred to in these assurances.\r\nThe payment mentioned above is subject to:\r\n- the Bill receiving Royal Assent; and\r\n- Cycling UK providing evidence to the Secretary of State of any application for the designations referred to in these assurances.”\r\n","Financial contribution","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Geffen, assurance 6","2018-07-16","Assurance","Borough of Stafford","Stafford Borough"]
["C100.7","N/A","HoL/0032","Cycling UK","1.\tThe Promoter will undertake further traffic surveys at Yarnfield Lane to cover the following matters:\r\na.\ttraffic volume counts by vehicle classification; and \r\nb.\tspeed surveys. \r\n2.\tThe Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to engage with the local highway and traffic authorities in relation to the speed limit on Yarnfield Lane during the Authorised Works, noting that any decision to modify the speed limit on this road is a matter for the local Traffic Authority and any provision of physical infrastructure would depend on the consent of the local Highway Authority and their adoption under highway powers.\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“the Authorised Works” has the meaning given to it in the Bill;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Cycling UK; and\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Yarnfield Lane","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Geffen, assurance 1 and 2 ","2019-10-21","Assurance","Borough of Stafford","Stafford Borough"]
["C101","Maximus Strategic Stafford LLP","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C101.1","N/A","HoC/0169","Maximus Strategic Stafford LLP","1.1 Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in paragraph 1.2, the Secretary of State will use reasonable endeavours to obtain powers to provide an integrated earth bund and noise barrier (providing equivalent noise attenuation functionality to that of a 3m above track noise barrier) of approximately 825m to be positioned on the western side of Work No. 48 between the northern end of the Hopton North Cutting and the Marston Bridleway 8 Accommodation Overbridge as shown indicatively on the Plan (“the New Bund”) and to provide for the realignment of the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 16 Diversion on an alignment which follows the outer limit of the New Bund as shown indicatively on the Plan (“the Alternative Bridleway Diversion”).\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 which must be satisfied by the date nine months from the date of Royal Assent to the Bill are that:\r\n1.2.1 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Alternative Bridleway Diversion would meet prevailing design standards and could be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n1.2.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the local planning or highway authority with responsibility for the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 16 Diversion does not have any objections to the construction of the Alternative Bridleway Alignment and will both agree to use its powers to provide for the creation of the bridleway (as necessary) and accept future maintenance responsibility;\r\n1.2.3 the Alternative Bridleway Alignment and New Bund do not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.4 any necessary approvals required under the Bill are given by the Local Planning and Local Highway Authorities;\r\n1.2.5 the Petitioner and/or Land Owner entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n1.2.5.1\tgrants any and all necessary rights over any land outside the land identified on the deposited plans as within the limits of land to be acquired or used for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme sufficient to enable the Secretary of State to construct and maintain the New Bund; and\r\n1.2.5.2\tprovides that the consideration payable to the Petitioners for using this land for the New Bund shall be calculated as if the Secretary of State had done so in exercise of powers in the Bill.\r\n1.2.6 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the proposed grassland habitat between the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 16 and the high speed railway and the proposed landscape mitigation planting between the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 16 Diversion and the high speed railway shown on CT-06-217 (being land which may be required for the New Bund), can be delivered elsewhere within the Proposed Scheme and/or accommodated within the New Bund without giving rise to any new or different significant adverse environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n1.2.7 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Alternative Bridleway Alignment will not impact on any public rights of way other than the Hopton and Colton Bridleway 16; and\r\n1.2.8 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Alternative Bridleway Alignment will not impact on any existing private means of access or new accommodation access, other than those used solely by the Petitioner, is impacted by the proposal.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 16 Diversion” means the proposed diversion of the Hopton and Coton Bridleway 16 labelled as such and shown on Plan CT-06-217 of the Colwich to Yarlet Community Area 2 Mapbook in Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement;\r\n“Land Owner” means\r\n·\tStephen Brandon, New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n·\tLesley Brandon, New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n·\tH Brandon & Sons, New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n·\tJames Muir, New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n·\tLucy Muir, New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n·\tMuir Farming Limited, New Buildings Farm, Sandon Road, Hopton, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n·\tMichael Williams, The Waddens, Weston, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST18 0HW.\r\n·\tElizabeth Williams, The Waddens, Weston, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST18 0HW.\r\n·\tKatherine Kingsley, The Byre, 38 Main Street, Orton on the Hill, Atherstone, CV9 3NN.\r\n·\tMatthew Williams, Hopton Farm, Stafford, ST18 9TH.\r\n·\tHopton Farming Partnership, The Waddens, Weston, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST18 0HW.\r\n·\tJohn Baker (as trustee of the K E Brandon Will Trust), c/o Mrs A Croft, The Priory, 6 Bull Ring, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 5HS.\r\n·\tDoreen Baker (as trustee of the K E Brandon Will Trust), c/o Mrs A Croft, The Priory, 6 Bull Ring, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 5HS.\r\n·\tAnnabel Croft (as beneficiary of the K E Brandon Will Trust), c/o Mrs A Croft, The Priory, 6 Bull Ring, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 5HS.\r\n·\tCaroline Edwards (as beneficiary of the K E Brandon Will Trust), c/o Mrs A Croft, The Priory, 6 Bull Ring, Much Wenlock, Shropshire, TF13 5HS.\r\n“the Petitioners’ Development” means the development authorised by the Planning Permission and all reserved matter applications submitted to the local planning authority pursuant to the Planning Permission; \r\n\r\n\r\n","Alternative Bridleway Diversion","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Willis (Shoosmiths LLP)","2018-07-16","Assurance","Hopton and Coton Bridleway","Stafford Borough"]
["C101.2","N/A","HoC/0169","Maximus Strategic Stafford LLP","3.1\tThe Promoter will continue to engage with the Petitioner in respect of the Planning Application for the Petitioner’s Development with a view to agreeing a technical solution to prevent conflicts between the Petitioner’s Development and the Proposed Scheme.\r\n3.2\tSubject to the Petitioner and Protected Land Owner first covenanting with the Promoter and the Local Planning Authority, in a form satisfactory to the Promoter, to restrict any development of the Protected Land pursuant to the Planning Permission in such a way so that the Promoter is satisfied that the development would not conflict with the Proposed Scheme, the Promoter will secure the withdrawal of the objection to the Planning Application made by High Speed Two (HS2) Limited on 24 May 2018 under the HS2 Phase 2a safeguarding directions issued by the Secretary of State for Transport on 27 September 2017.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Petitioners’ Development” means the development authorised by the Planning Permission and all reserved matter applications submitted to the local planning authority pursuant to the Planning Permission;\r\n“Protected Land Owner” means the owner of the Protected Land;\r\n“Protected Land” means that land shaded grey and hatched red on the Protected Land Plan being land subject to the Planning Application; \r\n“the Planning Application” means the planning application submitted by Maximus Strategic Stafford LLP to Stafford Borough Council for a mixed-use development with up to 2,000 dwellings with reference 16/25450/OUT;\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Planning Permission","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Willis (Shoosmiths LLP), Assurance 3","2018-07-16","Assurance","Hopton and Coton Bridleway","Stafford Borough"]
["C102","North Staffordshire Bridleway Association","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C102.1","N/A","HoC/0131","North Staffordshire Bridleway Association","The Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, and in particular, to keep the Petitioner informed of any proposed changes to the Bill which may result in changes to the Proposed Scheme affecting the bridleway networks in community areas CA3, CA4 and CA5 (if applicable) as described in the Environmental Statement.\r\n","Engagement with the Petitioner","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss Jane C Ridley","2018-07-17","Assurance","Borough of Stafford, Borough of Newcastle-under-Lyme and Borough of Cheshire East","Routewide"]
["C102.2","N/A","HoC/0131","North Staffordshire Bridleway Association","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to consider designing to a higher standard, taking into account site-specific conditions, where reasonably practicable and appropriate.\r\n","Design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Miss Jane C Ridley","2018-11-13","Assurance","Borough of Stafford, Borough of Newcastle-under-Lyme and Borough of Cheshire East","Routewide"]
["C103","The Yarlet Trust","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C103.1","N/A","HoC/0174","The Yarlet Trust","The Promoter will promote, and subject to the will of Parliament, will implement an Additional Provision to the Bill to deliver a new access from the A34 Stone Road to Yarlet School as shown, for indicative purposes, on the attached plan. (See letter)\r\n","Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis (Sharpe Pritchard)","2018-09-18","Assurance","A34 Stone Road to Yarlet School as shown on the plan attached to the letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C103.2","N/A","HoC/0174","The Yarlet Trust","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport\r\n","Various","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and The Yarlet Trust","2018-11-05","Undertaking","Yarlet School, Yarlet, Stafford ST18 9SU","Stafford Borough"]
["C103.3","N/A","AP2/0064","The Yarlet Trust","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to avoid, so far as reasonably practicable, using the existing Yarlet School access from the A34 for construction vehicles during normal school term pick up and drop off hours or on other occasions when the School expects significant numbers of children to be using that access, provided that the School has given not less than 6 weeks’ notice in writing to the nominated undertaker of those hours or other occasions.\r\n","Use of existing Yarlet School Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, (Sharpe Pritchard LLP) ","2019-04-26","Assurance","Yarlet School, Yarlet Hall, Yarlet, Staffordshire, ST18 9SU\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C103.4","N/A","AP2/0064","The Yarlet Trust","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, when undertaking the detailed design and construction of the Alternative Access, to use reasonable endeavours to avoid removing, or damaging the roots of, existing mature trees within plots AP2-1, AP2-2, AP2-12, AP2-16, AP2-17, AP2-18, AP2-19 AP2-20, AP2-22, AP2-24 in the Parishes of Stone Rural and Marston. \r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Alternative Access” means Work No. 61C in Additional Provision 2, being the provision of a new private access road from the A34 to Yarlet School;\r\n“mature trees” means trees that are close to their full height and crown size as determined by their species and growing conditions.\r\n\r\n","Mature Trees","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), assurance 1","2019-05-07","Assurance","Yarlet School, Yarlet Hall, Yarlet, Staffordshire. ST18 9SU\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C103.5","N/A","AP2/0064","The Yarlet Trust","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, when undertaking the detailed design of the Alternative Access to ensure that the gradient of the Alternative Access is no steeper than 1 in 12.5 (8%). \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Alternative Access” means Work No. 61C in Additional Provision 2, being the provision of a new private access road from the A34 to Yarlet School.\r\n\r\n","Gradient of Alternative Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), assurance 2","2019-05-07","Assurance","Yarlet School, Yarlet Hall, Yarlet, Staffordshire. ST18 9SU\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C103.6","N/A","AP2/0064","The Yarlet Trust","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, when carrying out the Utility Works, to ensure that all cables relating to those works on the Petitioner’s property are placed underground. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Utility Works” means the diversion of existing Western Power 11kV electricity lines shown on the Western Power Distribution plan number 2AS18A appended to this letter.\r\n\r\n","Utility works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, (Sharpe Pritchard LLP),  assurance 3","2019-05-07","Assurance","Yarlet School, Yarlet Hall, Yarlet, Staffordshire. ST18 9SU\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C103.7","N/A","AP2/0064","The Yarlet Trust","The Secretary of State will not exercise the compulsory powers of the Bill over the plots numbered 79, AP2-21 and AP2-26 in the Parish of Marston, as shown on Replacement Sheet 1-34 of the Parliamentary Plans accompanying the Bill, provided that:\r\n(a)\tthe Petitioner (and/or any other person with an interest in that land) grants to the Secretary of State, or to such other person as the Secretary of State directs, in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State, such interests in land and/or rights in land as will enable the nominated undertaker to carry out and maintain the Utility Works.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Utility Works” means the diversion of existing Western Power 11kV electricity lines shown on the Western Power Distribution plan number 2AS18A appended to this letter. \r\n\r\n","Compulsory acquisition","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, (Sharpe Pritchard LLP), assurance 4","2019-05-07","Assurance","Yarlet School, Yarlet Hall, Yarlet, Staffordshire. ST18 9SU\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C103.8","N/A","AP2/0064","The Yarlet Trust","1.1\tThe Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to work reasonably and in good faith with the Petitioner (on condition that the Petitioner works likewise) through detailed design to seek to agree and deliver an Alternative Access that meets the Petitioner’s objectives and is acceptable to the nominated undertaker, instead of Work No. 61C (which could include a reconfiguration of the existing car park and in any event would include a reconfiguration if any of the parking spaces existing at the date of this assurance were to be lost as a result of the Alternative Access).\r\n1.2\tAs soon as reasonably practicable after the date of this assurance, the nominated undertaker will produce to the Petitioner a reasonable proposed timetable for the implementation of this assurance, which will include a target of seeking agreement as mentioned in paragraph 1.1 before the Bill is considered by a Select Committee in the Second House.\r\n1.3\tIf the nominated undertaker and the Petitioner can agree an Alternative Access the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to begin the process of working up the design of, and obtaining all necessary consents to deliver, the Alternative Access as soon as practicable after the date on which the Select Committee of the First House reports the Bill, and to construct the Alternative Access as part of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.4 The assurances given in sub-paragraphs 1.1 and 1.3 are subject to:\r\n 1.4.1        the nominated undertaker obtaining all the necessary consents, including any consent or agreement required under the Highways Act 1980 and planning permission, required to implement the Alternative Access, with any conditions imposed on the nominated undertaker in relation to such consents being reasonably capable of implementation;\r\n 1.4.2        the nominated undertaker being able to secure the necessary rights to the Property on terms reasonable to the Secretary of State (which the nominated undertaker will make reasonable efforts to do); \r\n1.4.3        the nominated undertaker reasonably concluding that the Alternative Access can be delivered without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme including, in particular, that the cost of delivering the Alternative Access, including the obtaining of all necessary consents and property interests, is no greater than the cost of delivering Work No. 61C as determined by the nominated undertaker acting reasonably; and\r\n 1.4.4       that the delivery of the Alternative Access does not require the Secretary of State to promote an Additional Provision or order under the Transport and Works Act 1992, or to seek any other powers of compulsory acquisition in relation to the Alternative Access.  \r\n 1.5 In considering whether the condition in paragraph 1.4.3 is met:\r\n1.5.1\tthe nominated undertaker will give the Petitioner and the relevant highway authority a reasonable opportunity to comment before coming to its conclusion (unless the conclusion is that the condition is met) and will take into account any reasonable comments made by the Petitioner and the highway authority in response;\r\n1.5.2 \tthe Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to provide the Petitioner with information on the costs of both the Alternative Access and Work No. 61C;\r\n1.5.3 \tthe Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to ensure that the information on costs provided in accordance with paragraph 1.5.2 above is as detailed as is reasonably practicable, to assist the Petitioner in drawing a comparison between the costs of the Alternative Access and Work No. 61C.\r\n1.5.4 \tthe Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker when engaging with the Petitioner in relation to the design of the Alternative Access, and when providing costs in accordance with paragraph 1.5.2, to do so on a regular basis including, in particular, when there is a material change to the information shared previously. \r\n1.6 For the avoidance of doubt, should the conditions in paragraph 1.4 not be met, the  nominated undertaker will not construct the Alternative Access but shall construct Work No. 61C, if the House of Commons Select Committee decides to include that work in the Bill. \r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“Alternative Access” means an alternative to Work No. 61C;\r\n  “the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n “the Petitioner” means The Yarlet Trust;\r\n“the Property” means any land which is outside the Bill limits that would be required for the  construction, operation and maintenance of the Alternative Access;\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of High Speed 2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Select Committee” means a High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill Select Committee appointed to hear petitions against the Bill, in either the First House or the Second House; and\r\n“Work No. 61C” means an access road commencing at a point 750 metres north of the junction of Yarlet Lane with the A34 Stone Road and terminating by a junction with Work No. 61 at a point 145 metres north-west of its commencement, as described in Additional Provision 2.\r\n\r\n","Alternative Access Proposal","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, (Sharpe Pritchard LLP),   assurance 1","2019-05-15","Assurance","Yarlet School, Yarlet Hall, Yarlet, Staffordshire. ST18 9SU\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C103.9","N/A","AP2/0064","The Yarlet Trust","2.1\tIn the event that the nominated undertaker and the Petitioner agree an Alternative Access and the conditions of paragraph 1.4 are met such that, in accordance with paragraph 1.1, the Secretary of State requires the nominated undertaker to deliver that Alternative Access, the assurance  to implement an Additional Provision to the Bill to deliver a new access from the A34 Stone Road to Yarlet School, which was given to the Petitioner on behalf of the Secretary of State by letter dated 18 September 2018, shall no longer apply and the Secretary of State shall not require the nominated undertaker to construct Work No. 61\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“Alternative Access” means an alternative to Work No. 61C;\r\n  “the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n “the Petitioner” means The Yarlet Trust;\r\n“Work No. 61C” means an access road commencing at a point 750 metres north of the junction of Yarlet Lane with the A34 Stone Road and terminating by a junction with Work No. 61 at a point 145 metres north-west of its commencement, as described in Additional Provision 2.","Effect on prior assurance","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, (Sharpe Pritchard LLP),   assurance 2","2019-05-15","Assurance","Yarlet School, Yarlet Hall, Yarlet, Staffordshire. ST18 9SU\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C103.10","N/A","AP2/0064","The Yarlet Trust","See undertaking between the Secretary of State for Transport and The Yarlet Trust","Various","See undertaking signed on behalf of the SoS for Transport and The Yarlet Trust ","2020-07-14","Undertaking","Yarlet School, Yarlet Hall, Yarlet, Staffordshire. ST18 9SU\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C104","Colton Parish Council","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C104.1","N/A","HoC/0047","Colton Parish Council","1. Subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 2 below, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours\r\na) to create a footpath on the south side of the railway commencing  at point Y on Newlands Lane and continuing to the east of Newlands Lane through the area of the proposed woodland habitat creation and ending at point X where it will join the diverted Footpath 36 as shown by a line coloured light orange on the attached plan; [attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are:\r\na) the Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents in order to create the additional footpaths referred to in this assurance;\r\nb) the necessary approvals of the highway authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill;\r\nc) confirmation from the highway authority that it shall enter into an adoption agreement in relation to the additional footpath created under paragraph 1(a) above and the footpath link; and \r\nd) the additional footpaths   \r\ni. not resulting in creating any new or different environmental effects than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and \r\nii. not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.","Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Alison James, paragraphs 1a and 2","2018-09-28","Assurance","Newlands Lane, Blithbury ","Stafford Borough"]
["C104.2","N/A","HoC/0047","Colton Parish Council","1. Subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 2 below, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours\r\nb) not to stop up permanently the part of Footpath 34 shown by a dashed line coloured dark orange between points P10 and Z on the attached plan [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are:\r\na) the Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents in order to create the additional footpaths referred to in this assurance;\r\nb) the necessary approvals of the highway authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill;\r\nc) confirmation from the highway authority that it shall enter into an adoption agreement in relation to the additional footpath created under paragraph 1(a) above and the footpath link; and \r\nd) the additional footpaths   \r\ni. not resulting in creating any new or different environmental effects than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and \r\nii. not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Access via Footpath 34","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Alison James, paragraphs 1b and 2","2018-09-28","Assurance","Footpath 34 shown on the plan attached to the assurance letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C104.3","N/A","HoC/0047","Colton Parish Council","1. Subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 2 below, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours\r\nc) to create a footpath shown as a line coloured dark orange between points marked Z and P4 (‘footpath link’) on the north side of the railway to join the diverted Footpath 36 to Footpath 34 as referred to in paragraph b) above. \r\n2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are:\r\na) the Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents in order to create the additional footpaths referred to in this assurance;\r\nb) the necessary approvals of the highway authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill;\r\nc) confirmation from the highway authority that it shall enter into an adoption agreement in relation to the additional footpath created under paragraph 1(a) above and the footpath link; and \r\nd) the additional footpaths   \r\ni. not resulting in creating any new or different environmental effects than those reported in the Environmental Statement; and \r\nii. not prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Access - joining Footpath 36 to Footpath 34 ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Alison James, paragraphs 1c and 2","2018-09-28","Assurance","Footpath 36 and Footpath 34 as identified on plan attached to the assurance letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C105","Harrison, Mr D G and Mr A M","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C105.1 ","N/A","N/A","Mr D G And Mr A M Harrison","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to complete the detailed design of the Accommodation Overbridge so as to accommodate articulated vehicles on the immediate approaches to and over the Accommodation Overbridge up to 16.5 meters in length and up to a maximum weight of 44 tonnes during the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme for the purposes of facilitating access to Ingestre Wood.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\"the Accommodation Overbridge” means the Tixall Bridleway 0.1628 Accommodation Overbridge forming part of Work No. 49 as shown on plan No. 1-28 as deposited with the Bill;\r\n","Detailed design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr D G and Mr A M Harrison","2018-10-24","Assurance","Tixall Bridleway 0.1628 Accommodation Overbridge ","Stafford Borough"]
["C106","Inland Waterways Association","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C106.1","N/A","HoC/0002","Inland Waterways Association","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker at the time of detailed design to consider further measures to reduce the noise impacts arising from operation of the Proposed Scheme on the moorings at the Great Haywood Marina, having regard to the overall design of the Great Haywood Viaduct.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Great Haywood Viaduct” means the viaduct to be constructed as part of the works for Phase 2a of High Speed 2, labelled as such on map CT-06-212 of the Phase 2a Environmental Statement.\r\n","Noise mitigation on the Great Haywood Viaduct","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Philip G Sharpe, assurance 1","2018-11-13","Assurance","The Great Haywood Viaduct, on map CT-06-212 of the Phase 2a Environmental Statement.","Stafford Borough"]
["C106.2","N/A","HoC/0002","Inland Waterways Association","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker, in exercising the powers of the Bill, to consider whether additional noise mitigation is required on the Trent and Mersey Canal North viaduct.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Trent and Mersey Canal North viaduct” means the viaduct to be constructed as part of the works for Phase One of High Speed 2, labelled as such on map CT-06-200 of the Phase 2a Environmental Statement.\r\n","Noise mitigation on the Trent and Mersey Canal North Viaduct","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Philip G Sharpe, assurance 2","2018-11-13","Assurance","The Trent and Mersey Canal North viaduct, labelled as such on map CT-06-200 of the Phase 2a Environmental Statement.","Lichfield District"]
["C107","Simmons, Frank and Angela","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C107.1","N/A","HoC/0068\t","Frank and Angela Simmons","Should Mr and Mrs Simmons apply for their property to be purchased, the Promoter will agree to acquire the property under atypical circumstances, and as a result they will be offered the same compensation package as their neighbour.\r\n","Acquisition","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's Second Special Report of Session 2017 - 2019, paragraph 40","2018-11-13","Assurance","\"The Gables\", Yarlet Lane, Marston, Stafford, ST18 9ST","Stafford Borough"]
["C108","Birchill, Robert","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C108.1","N/A","HoC/0046","Robert Anthony Birchill","Should Mr Birchill apply for his property to be purchased, the Promoter will agree to acquire under atypical circumstances at a price reflecting 100% of the unblighted market value of the property.\r\n","Acquisition","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's Second Special Report of Session 2017 - 2019, paragraph 75","2018-11-13","Assurance","Tortola Birch Tree Lane, Whitmore Heath, Newcastle under Lyme, Staffordshire ST5 5HE","Newcastle-under-Lyme"]
["C109","Irwin, Lily and Gaynor Irwin","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C109.1","N/A","HoC/0123 & 0125","Lily Catherine Irwin and Gaynor Irwin","1.  In paragraph 1.2 below “Junctions” means the junction of the A51 Nantwich Road and the A525 Audlem Road and the junction of the A51 London Road and the A525 Newcastle Road both of which being located in the Village of Woore, in the District of Shropshire.\r\n 1.2 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to -\r\n∙\tengage with the Petitioner in advance of finalising the relevant HS2 Local Traffic Management Plan insofar as it relates to HS2 Large Goods Vehicle movements at the Junctions, with view to ensuring that access to Manor House is not prevented at any time by HS2 construction traffic; and\r\n∙\tengage with the Ambulance Service and other local emergency medical services servicing the village of Woore to seek to establish emergency response times for those services in relation to Manor House and seek to ensure that achieving these response times is not prevented by HS2 construction traffic;\r\nfor so long as Ms Lily Catherine Irwin resides at Manor House and the Junctions are being used by HS2 Large Goods Vehicles as part of a HS2 construction route approved under Schedule 17 of the Phase 2a Bill.\r\n","Access to Manor House","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Ms Irwin","2018-12-19","Assurance","The junction of A51 Nantwich Road and the A525 Audlem Road and the junction of the A51 London Road and the A525 Newcastle Road, Woore","Shropshire"]
["C109.2","N/A","HoC/0123 & 0125","Lily Catherine Irwin and Gaynor Irwin","1.  The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner to acquire the Property under special circumstances subject to the following conditions:\r\n1.1 The Petitioner enters into a non-disclosure agreement provided by the Secretary of State; and\r\n1.2 The basis of the acquisition would be on the same terms as if the Property had been acquired under the Need to Sell Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n “Need to Sell” means the non-statutory scheme available to eligible owner-occupiers who can demonstrate that they have a compelling reason to sell their property, but have been unable to do so other than at a substantially reduced value, as a result of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Lily Catherine Irwin and Gaynor Irwin; \r\n “the Property” means the Manor House, Audlem Road, Woore, Shropshire, CW3 9RJ; and\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Purchase of the property","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs Irwin","2019-07-17","Assurance","The Manor House, Audlem Road, Woore, Shropshire, CW3 9RJ\r\n","Shropshire"]
["C109.3","N/A","HoC/0123 & 0125","Lily Catherine Irwin and Gaynor Irwin","1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner to acquire the Property under special circumstances subject to the following conditions: \r\n1.1. The Petitioner enters into a non-disclosure agreement provided by the Secretary of State; and\r\n 1.2. The basis of the acquisition would be on the same terms as if the Property had been acquired under the Need to Sell Scheme plus the payment of the Petitioner’s reasonable relocation costs, including Stamp Duty on the new property.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Need to Sell” means the non-statutory scheme available to eligible owner-occupiers who can demonstrate that they have a compelling reason to sell their property, but have been unable to do so other than at a substantially reduced value, as a result of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n“the nominated undertaker” refers to the body or bodies appointed by the Secretary of State to carry out the powers conferred under the Bill to construct and maintain the Proposed Scheme. The nominated undertaker may be HS2 Ltd, or it may be another body or bodies appointed to oversee the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme and in the period before Royal Assent to the Bill means High Speed Two (HS2) Limited; \r\n“the Petitioner” means Lily Catherine Irwin and Gaynor Irwin; \r\n“the Property” means the Manor House, Audlem Road, Woore, Shropshire, CW3 9RJ. \r\n","Purchase of the property","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Mrs Gaynor Irwin, assurance 1","2020-06-30","Assurance","The Manor House, Audlem Road, Woore, Shropshire, CW3 9RJ\r\n","Shropshire"]
["C110","Priory Education Services Limited","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C110.1","N/A","HoC/0176 & AP1/0004","Priory Education Services","1. The Promoter believes that the measures set out in the draft Code of Construction Practice would be sufficient to manage and control dust from the construction of the HS2 Works. However, the Promoter recognises that the reasonable concerns of the Petitioners regarding potential air quality impacts on Rugeley School could be allayed by a commitment to monitor dust during construction. The Promoter therefore offers the following assurances:\r\n 1.1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to treat the HS2 Works as \"medium risk\" as set out in the Institute of Air Quality Management (IAQM) Guidance on the assessment of dust from demolition and construction 2014 (\"IAQM, 2014\"), as revised from time to time, for the purposes of worksite boundary construction dust monitoring unless and until it is demonstrated by the nominated undertaker's appointed contractor that the construction worksites for the HS2 Works do not meet the criteria to be classed as medium risk under IAQM 2014.\r\n1.2. Worksite boundary automatic continuous construction dust monitoring will be undertaken at the relevant construction worksite(s) for any such period that it is treated as medium risk under clause 1.2 as set out in Section 7.3 of the draft Code of Construction Practice, and the results will be reported back to the Priory Group in the manner described in Section 4.3 of the draft Code of Construction Practice, including the investigation of the Site Action Level being exceeded, as appropriate.\r\n1.3. For the avoidance of doubt, in the event that it is determined that a relevant construction worksite does not meet the criteria to be classed as medium risk in accordance with paragraph 1.2, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to share with the School the information on which that determination has been made and to have due regard to the School's reasonable representations before determining that the risk is low or reducing the level of risk from medium to low.\r\n“In these assurances:\r\n“the HS2 Works” means the construction works to be authorised by the Bill within the vicinity of the School;\r\n“the Petitioners” means Priory Education Services Limited (registered company number 06244880) and Priory Finance Property Limited (registered company number OC315650), both having their registered offices at Fifth Floor, 80 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD including, where applicable, the management team at Rugeley School; and\r\n“the Site Action Level” means, as described in the draft Code of Construction Practice, a measurement threshold for continuous automatic airborne dust monitoring above which investigations will be required.\r\n\r\n","Air Quality","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, assurance 1","2019-02-04","Assurance","Blithbury Road, Blithbury \r\nRugeley, Staffordshire \r\nWS15 3JQ; Impacts at Rugeley School\r\n","Lichfield District"]
["C110.2","N/A","HoC/0176 & AP1/0004","Priory Education Services","3. The Promoter offers the following assurances in respect of potential traffic and transport impacts during the HS2 Works:\r\n3.1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to seek to engage with the Petitioners and Staffordshire County Council (as local highway authority) prior to completion of the detailed design of any traffic management measures relating to the HS2 Works which may reasonably affect the routes used for the transport of pupils to and from Rugeley School during term time, being measures within 2.5km of Rugeley School or such other distance as the nominated undertaker may agree with the Petitioners and highway authority, with a view to reducing as far as reasonably practicable disruption to the transport of pupils caused by such works.\r\n3.2. The nominated undertaker shall give reasonable advance notice to the Petitioners of the commencement of any HS2 Works which would lead to foreseeable material additional traffic on the routes described in paragraph 3.1.\r\n3.3. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to give due consideration during the detailed design of the traffic management measures described in paragraph 3.1 to the matters set out at paragraphs 3.3.1 to 3.3.2 with a view to reducing any significant adverse impacts on pupil’s journeys to and from Rugeley School so far as reasonably practicable, subject to such further measures being of benefit to vulnerable pupils, having no material adverse impacts upon the construction programme or costs of the HS2 Works and being achievable within the limits and powers of the Bill:\r\n3.3.1. timing of works to avoid seasonal peak periods of activity for the school, and carrying out the HS2 Works during school holidays where it is reasonably practicable to do so;\r\n3.3.2. timing of any particularly disruptive short term peak levels of construction traffic to avoid, where reasonably practicable, hours of peak travel activity to and from Rugeley School during term time; and\r\n3.3.3 seeking to co-ordinate, so far as is reasonably practicable, the HS2 Works with separate elements of works on the relevant roads, including consulting with the relevant highway authority to explore scope for co-ordinating the nominated undertakers works on relevant roads with planned works of third parties.\r\n3.4 Paragraph 3.3 is subject to any reasonable requirements of the planning authority where works are subject to the consent of the planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n","Traffic and Transport\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, assurance 3","2019-02-04","Assurance","Blithbury Road, Blithbury \r\nRugeley, Staffordshire \r\nWS15 3JQ ","Lichfield District"]
["C110.3","N/A","HoC/00176 & AP1/0004","Priory Education Services","4. The Promoter offers the following assurances to the Petitioners in respect of potential health impacts of the HS2 Works:\r\n4.1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to seek to engage with the Petitioners with a view to managing the HS2 Works so as to reduce, so far as reasonably practicable, adverse health impacts on vulnerable pupils attending Rugeley School. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to:\r\n4.1.1 identify, and seek to agree with the Petitioners appropriate and proportionate measures to mitigate the adverse impacts of construction of the HS2 Works on the pupils of Rugeley School and to implement those measures where reasonably necessary;\r\n4.1.2 have regard to, and continue to review, the potential impact of the HS2 Works on travel to and from Rugeley School and how this can be avoided or reduced; and to\r\n4.1.3 agree an engagement plan with the Petitioners, to include sharing in advance, the construction programme on a periodic basis (the frequency to be agreed with the Petitioners) with a view to understanding construction activities which are likely to significantly disrupt learning or public examinations.\r\n","Health\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, assurance 4","2019-02-04","Assurance","Blithbury Road, Blithbury \r\nRugeley, Staffordshire \r\nWS15 3JQ ","Lichfield District"]
["C110.4","N/A","HoC/0176 & AP1/0004","Priory Education Services","5. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to meet the Petitioners’ expenses, insofar as reasonably and properly incurred, in relation to the implementation of the Promoter’s assurances in this letter. This is to include, in particular, the reasonable costs of the consideration by a suitably qualified person of the information provided to the Petitioners in relation to dust monitoring. This assurance is subject to (i) the nominated undertaker’s prior approval of such costs (not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed); the submission of receipts for costs so approved (including such further detail and/or evidence as the Promoter may reasonably require; and the Petitioners seeking to mitigate any costs for which recovery is sought.\r\n","Costs\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, assurance 5","2019-02-04","Assurance","Blithbury Road, Blithbury \r\nRugeley, Staffordshire \r\nWS15 3JQ ","Lichfield District"]
["C110.5","N/A","HoL/0021","Priory Education Services","1. The Promoter offers the following assurances in respect of potential traffic and transport impacts during the HS2 Works:\r\n1.1. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to seek to engage with the Petitioners and Staffordshire County Council (as local highway authority) prior to completion of the detailed design of any traffic management measures relating to the HS2 Works which may reasonably affect the routes used for the transport of pupils between Mayfield House and Rugeley School during term time, with a view to reducing as far as reasonably practicable disruption to the transport of pupils caused by such works.\r\n1.2. The nominated undertaker shall give reasonable advance notice to the Petitioners of the commencement of any HS2 Works which would lead to foreseeable material additional traffic on the routes described in paragraph 1.1.\r\n1.3. The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to give due consideration during the detailed design of the traffic management measures described in paragraph 1.1 to the matters set out at paragraphs 1.3.1 to 1.3.3 with a view to reducing any significant adverse impacts on pupil’s journeys to and from Mayfield House so far as reasonably practicable, subject to such further measures being of benefit to vulnerable pupils, having no material adverse impacts upon the construction programme or costs of the Proposed Scheme and being achievable within the limits and powers of the Bill:\r\n1.3.1. timing of works to avoid seasonal peak periods of activity for residents of Mayfield House attending Rugeley School, and carrying out the HS2 Works during school holidays where it is reasonably practicable to do so;\r\n1.3.2. timing of any particularly disruptive short term peak levels of construction traffic to avoid, where reasonably practicable, hours of peak travel activity to and from Mayfield House during term time; and\r\n1.3.3. seeking to co-ordinate, so far as is reasonably practicable, the HS2 Works with separate elements of works on the relevant roads, including consulting with the relevant highway authority to explore scope for co-ordinating the nominated undertaker’s works on relevant roads with planned works of third parties.\r\n1.4. Paragraph 1.3 is subject to any reasonable requirements of the planning authority where works are subject to the consent of the planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the “Bill” includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the HS2 Works” means the construction works to be authorised by the Bill within the vicinity of Mayfield House;\r\n“Mayfield House” means the residential care home operated by the Petitioner located at Mayfield Residential Home, Moreton House, Staffordshire ST18 0XD;\r\n“the Petitioners” means Priory Education Services Limited (registered company number 06244880) and Priory Finance Property Limited (registered company number OC315650), both 11099/136/ having their registered offices at Fifth Floor, 80 Hammersmith Road, London, W14 8UD including, where applicable, the management team at Mayfield House;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; and\r\n“Rugeley School” means the school operated by the Petitioner located at Blithbury Road, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire WS15 3JQ.\r\n\r\n\r\n","Traffic and Transport\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, assurance 1.1 to 1.4","2019-09-30","Assurance","Blithbury Road, Blithbury \r\nRugeley, Staffordshire \r\nWS15 3JQ ","Lichfield District"]
["C110.6","N/A","HoL/0021","Priory Education Services","Subject to you countersigning this letter confirming that the Petitioners will use reasonable endeavours to continue negotiations with the Promoter in good faith to complete the Documentation relating to Moreton House the Promoter will correspondingly use reasonable endeavours to continue negotiations with the Petitioners in good faith and complete the Documentation relating to Moreton House.\r\n *Please see assurance letter for relevant definitions*\r\n","Documentation relating to Moreton House (Mayfield House)\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Tim Broomhead, assurance 1","2020-04-29","Assurance","Moreton House (Mayfield House), Bishton Lane, Wolseley Bridge ST18 0XD ","Lichfield District"]
["C111","Hollinshead, Raymond John and Gill Maree","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C111.1","N/A","HoC/0057","Raymond John and Gill Maree Hollinshead","1.1 The Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n","Provision of information","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 1","2019-02-13","Assurance","4 Pellfield Court, Weston, Stafford, ST18 0JG","Stafford Borough"]
["C111.2","N/A","HoC/0057","Raymond John and Gill Maree Hollinshead","2.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n2.2 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n2.3 Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 2","2019-02-13","Assurance","4 Pellfield Court, Weston, Stafford, ST18 0JG","Stafford Borough"]
["C111.3","N/A","HoC/0057","Raymond John and Gill Maree Hollinshead","3.1 The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n3.2 The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.3  The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n3.4  Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n3.5  As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.6 Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 3","2019-02-13","Assurance","4 Pellfield Court, Weston, Stafford, ST18 0JG","Stafford Borough"]
["C111.4","N/A","HoC/0057","Raymond John and Gill Maree Hollinshead","4.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of  State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n4.2 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 4.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n4.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n4.2.2 \tseek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n4.3 \tIn this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n4.4  Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 4","2019-02-13","Assurance","4 Pellfield Court, Weston, Stafford, ST18 0JG","Stafford Borough"]
["C111.5","N/A","HoC/0057","Raymond John and Gill Maree Hollinshead","5.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n• a pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n• a target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n• a method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n• advice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n• recommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n• advice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n• advice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n• a schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 5.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n• a final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n5.2  Should the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 5.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n5.3  The reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n5.4  The agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of Construction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements undertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson, assurance 5","2019-02-13","Assurance","4 Pellfield Court, Weston, Stafford, ST18 0JG","Stafford Borough"]
["C111.6","N/A","HoC/0057","Raymond John and Gill Maree Hollinshead","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","4 Pellfield Court, Weston, Stafford, ST18 0JG","Stafford Borough"]
["C112","R G Parrott, Exors of G Parrott (Deceased), Cawarden Brick & Tile Ltd, LMEP Services Ltd and Clean Landfill Ltd","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C112.1","N/A","HoC/0012","R G Parrott, Exors of G Parrott (Deceased), Cawarden Brick & Tile Ltd, LMEP Services Ltd and Clean Landfill Ltd","Subject to the successful promotion by the Promoter of the AP2 Grid Supply Point Connection the Secretary of State will not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill over the Owners’ Land shaded grey on the plan.\r\n\r\nIn this Assurance:\r\n“AP2 Grid Supply Point Connection” means a connection from the national grid supply between Parkgate, on the B5234, 1.5km west of Newborough, and the Newlands Lane Auto Transformer Feeder Station, as illustrated on Sheets 15 – 15 G of the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Additional Provision Plans and Sections dated February 2019;\r\n“Owners” means R G Parrot, Executors of G Parrott (Deceased), Cawarden Brick & Tile Ltd, LMEP Services Ltd and Clean Landfill Ltd;\r\n“Owners Land” means Cawarden Springs Farm shown edged red on the plan;\r\n“Plan” means the plan attached to this assurance [attached to beneficiary letter]","Compulsory land purchase","Letter from Oliver Bayne to Roger Bedson, Hinson Parry & Company","2019-02-25","Assurance","The land shaded grey on the plan attached to the assurance at Cawarden Springs Farm, Cawarden Brick & Tile Ltd, LMEP Services Ltd, Clean Landfill Ltd, WS15 3HL","Stafford Borough"]
["C113","Hampton, Mr Andrew and Mrs","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C113.1","N/A","HoC/0037","Mr Andrew Hampton and Mrs Hampton","1.1\tThe Promoter will keep the Petitioner informed of the progress of the Bill and of likely target dates for implementation of Phase 2A of the HS2 project.\r\n","Provision of information ","Letter from Oliver Bayne to Roger Bedson, Hinson Parry & Company, assurance 1","2019-02-27","Assurance","Bar Hill Farm, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe, CW3 9DE\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C113.2","N/A","HoC/0037","Mr Andrew Hampton and Mrs Hampton","2.1\tNotwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n2.2\tNotwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 28 days’ notice of entry under Part 1 of Schedule 15 in relation to the temporary occupation of land the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours, and in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n2.3\tFollowing the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession ","Letter from Oliver Bayne to Roger Bedson, Hinson Parry & Company, assurance 2","2019-02-27","Assurance","Bar Hill Farm, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe, CW3 9DE\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C113.3","N/A","HoC/0037","Mr Andrew Hampton and Mrs Hampton","3.1 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will identify with the farmer existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n3.2 \tThe location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.3 \tThe Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the farmer in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n3.4 \tPrior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the farmer which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n3.5 \tAs-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the farmer or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n3.6 \tWhere natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the farmer.\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne to Roger Bedson, Hinson Parry & Company, assurance 3","2019-02-27","Assurance","Bar Hill Farm, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe, CW3 9DE\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C113.4","N/A","HoC/0037","Mr Andrew Hampton and Mrs Hampton","4.1 \tPrior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (“the Bill”), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult an owner/tenant of an agricultural holding regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of that holding under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works.\r\n4.2 \tThe Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 4.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation,\r\n4.2.1\tseek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n4.2.2 \tseek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the relevant owner/tenant to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the agricultural holding in question following the completion of construction of the works.\r\n4.3 \tIn this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of accommodation works, landscaping and other mitigation works, drainage works and the construction of balancing ponds, embankments, bunds and made-up ground required for Phase 2A purposes.\r\n4.4 \tNothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 Project but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\n","Detailed design ","Letter from Oliver Bayne to Roger Bedson, Hinson Parry & Company, assurance 4","2019-02-27","Assurance","Bar Hill Farm, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe, CW3 9DE\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C113.5","N/A","HoC/0037","Mr Andrew Hampton and Mrs Hampton","5.1 \tThe Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to work with landowners and farmers whose productive agricultural soils are temporarily affected by the construction of the HS2 works and/or are affected temporarily as a result of land raising, with the intention to bring agricultural soils back to enable their former use before construction of the HS2 works on the relevant land and shall prepare in consultation with the relevant landowner and relevant planning authority an agricultural soils plan in advance of construction that shall include:-\r\n•\ta pre-disturbance record of the soil physical characteristics;\r\n•\ta target specification, set by the Nominated Undertaker and informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, for agricultural soils being restored to agriculture after temporary use;\r\n•\ta method of assessing the suitability of handling soils based on plastic limit (i.e. to avoid moving soils when wet and plastic so that they would not compact when replaced);\r\n•\tadvice on stripping topsoil and subsoil to the correct depth;\r\n•\trecommendations of the most suitable equipment for soil handling;\r\n•\tadvice on soil storage (e.g. heights and management of soil stores);\r\n•\tadvice on alleviating compaction after replacement;\r\n•\ta schedule of aftercare maintenance, to include soil testing, appropriate to the target specification for a period of up to five years (subject to paragraph 5.2) following completion of the relevant construction work; and\r\n•\ta final report to determine the final handover condition of the agricultural soil.\r\n5.2 \tShould the target specification not be met by the expiry of the period of five years for aftercare maintenance mentioned in paragraph 5.1 (“the initial period”), then, if the landowner has fully complied with a schedule of aftercare, the Nominated Undertaker, informed by a suitably qualified agricultural soils scientist or practitioner, has reasonable grounds to believe that the target specification could be met within a further period (being no longer than a further period of five years), and the initial period shall be extended by that period.\r\n5.3 \tThe reasonable cost of compliance by the relevant landowner with the schedule of aftercare shall be borne by the Nominated Undertaker save where such cost has been compensated under the compensation code.\r\n5.4 \tThe agricultural soils plan will be incorporated in and prepared as part of the Code of \tConstruction Practice to form part of the Environmental Minimum Requirements \tundertaking given by the Secretary of State before Parliament.\r\n","Agricultural soils ","Letter from Oliver Bayne to Roger Bedson, Hinson Parry & Company, assurance 5","2019-02-27","Assurance","Bar Hill Farm, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe, CW3 9DE\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C113.6","N/A","HoC/0037","Mr Andrew Hampton and Mrs Hampton","1.1 Notwithstanding the requirements under the Bill to give 3 months’ notice of entry in relation to the outright acquisition of land, where reasonably practicable, the Nominated Undertaker will provide a longer period of notice to the Petitioner in respect of any of the Petitioner’s land to be acquired outright under the Bill.\r\n1.2 Notwithstanding the requirements of the Assurance to give three months’ notice of entry under temporary possession powers in relation to the temporary occupation of land but subject to paragraph 1.3, the Nominated Undertaker will notify the Petitioner of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which the Petitioner’s land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill. This notification will be given to the Promoter at least 3 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter (the “notification”), and reasonable endeavours will be made to give notification at least 6 months in advance of the beginning of that quarter.\r\n1.3  The Nominated Undertaker may give the notification less than 3 months in advance of the beginning of the quarter in the following circumstances:-\r\n1.3.1  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker becomes aware of another occupier of the relevant land that was not known to the Nominated Undertaker on the date the notification was served;\r\n1.3.2  where following the Nominated Undertaker having given the Landowner and any other occupier of relevant land the notification, the Nominated Undertaker has to enter onto the relevant land sooner than on the expiry of the notification due to intervening circumstances; and\r\n1.3.3 where the Landowner and any other occupier of the relevant land agree that the Nominated Undertaker may enter onto the relevant land under temporary possession powers without the need to serve the notification.\r\n1.4 In this assurance:-\r\n1.4.1 “intervening circumstances” means circumstances which require entry by the Nominated Undertaker onto the relevant land to carry out works or undertake activities which could not have been reasonably pre-planned or foreseen by the Nominated Undertaker as being required to be undertaken before expiry of the notification;\r\n1.4.2  “relevant land” means the whole or part of agricultural land belonging to the landowner which is subject to the exercise by the Nominated Undertaker of temporary possession powers;\r\n1.4.3 “temporary possession powers” means the power of temporary occupation of land to be conferred on the Nominated Undertaker under paragraph 1 of schedule 15 to the Bill.\r\n1.5  Following the receipt by the Nominated Undertaker of the programme of works from the relevant works contractor in relation to the Petitioner’s land, the Promoter will provide to, and discuss with, the Petitioner an estimate of the likely period of occupation of the Petitioners land and shall from time to time update the Petitioner with further information as to the likely extent of the period of temporary occupation.\r\n","Notices of entry and taking possession\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne to Roger Bedson, (Hinson Parry & Company), Annex A","2019-07-09","Assurance","Bar Hill Farm, Bar Hill, Madeley, Crewe, CW3 9DE\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C114","Madeley White Star FC","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C114.1","N/A","N/A","Madeley White Star FC","The Secretary of State shall require the Nominated Undertaker to use reasonable endeavours not to prevent access to Madeley White Star Football Club (“the Club”) at the times when the Club is used for training and / or when football matches are being held during the works to install the tunnel boring machine power supply along Manor Road as specified in AP2 or otherwise by prior agreement with the Club.\r\n","Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mark Healings (Madeley White Star FC)","2019-03-05","Assurance","Madeley White Star FC\r\nManor Road\r\nMadeley\r\nCrewe\r\nCW3 9PS\r\n","Newcastle-under-Lyme"]
["C115","Robinson, Dorothy","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C115.1","N/A","AP2/0048","Dorothy Robinson","1.1. Subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to re-provide the access point between the Farm Land and Wood End Lane shown for indicative purposes only on the Plan (“the proposed access point”) including the provision of a gate at the proposed access point. \r\n1.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.2 are: \r\n1.2.1 that the proposed access:\r\n1.2.1.1. can be accommodated within the existing powers of the Bill and does not require any additional land or powers to those currently provided for within the Bill; or \r\n1.2.1.2. the Landowner grants any and all necessary rights over the required land sufficient to enable the Nominated Undertaker to construct the proposed access on the land and secures all necessary permissions, consents or approvals required to construct the proposed access. \r\n1.2.3. that the proposed access can be constructed and maintained without giving rise to any new or different significant environmental effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill; \r\n1.2.4. the Local Highway Authority is satisfied with the design and alignment of the proposed access and gate; \r\n1.2.5. any required statutory approvals required from the Local Highway Authority under Schedule 4 to the Bill being secured; and \r\n1.2.6. the construction and operation of the proposed access does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of HS2 Phase 2a.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Farm Land” means the land shown edged [red] on the Plan [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n“the Landowner” means Dorothy Robinson of Brownfields Farm, Netherstowe, Lichfield, WS13 8EQ.\r\n"," Field access\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dorothy Robinson ","2019-03-06","Assurance","The access point between the land shown edged red on the Plan attached to the assurance and Wood End Lane.","Lichfield District"]
["C115.2","N/A","AP2/0048","Dorothy Robinson","1.1. The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the landowner existing drainage arrangements on the holding. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n1.2. The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.3. The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the Petitioner in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n1.4. Prior to the commencement of significant construction works, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the Petitioner which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n1.5. As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works will be provided to the Petitioner or the Landowner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n 1.6. Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the Petitioner.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Landowner” means Dorothy Robinson of Brownfields Farm, Netherstowe, Lichfield, WS13 8EQ.\r\n","Drainage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dorothy Robinson ","2019-03-06","Assurance","Brownfields Farm, Netherstowe, Lichfield, WS13 8EQ","Lichfield District"]
["C115.3","N/A","AP2/0048","Dorothy Robinson","1.1.\tIn carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State shall, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below, require the nominated undertaker to:\r\n1.1.1.\tengage with the Petitioner regarding the configuration of the Temporary Material Stockpile; \r\n1.1.2.\tuse reasonable endeavours to reduce and/or reconfigure the Temporary Material Stockpile so far as reasonably practicable, with the aim of reducing the amount of Agricultural Land used for the Temporary Material Stockpile. \r\n 1.2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n 1.2.1.\tany proposed reduction or reconfiguration of the Temporary Material Stockpile does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement;\r\n1.2.2.\tany proposed reduction or reconfiguration of the Temporary Material Stockpile does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n 1.2.3.\tany proposed reduction or reconfiguration of the Temporary Material Stockpile receives any required approval from the local planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Agricultural Land” means grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988;\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited at Parliament with the Bill;\r\n “Plan” means the plan included at the annex;\r\n“the Petitioner” means SP Robinson and Son c/o Dorothy Robinson and Richard Robinson of Brownsfield Farm, Lichfield, Staffordshire WS13 8EQ whose petition dated 15 March 2019 has been given the reference ‘HS2-AP2-048’; \r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Temporary Material Stockpile” means the area shown indicatively outlined in blue on the Plan where materials excavated during the construction of the Proposed Scheme will be stored temporarily before being reused.\r\n","Temporary material stockpile\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dorothy Robinson ","2019-04-15","Assurance","Brownsfield Farm, Lichfield, Staffordshire WS13 8EQ ","Lichfield District"]
["C116","Sherwood, Mr John and Mrs Helen","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C116.1","N/A","N/A","Mr and Mrs Sherwood","1. The Secretary of State will not exercise the compulsory acquisition powers of the Bill over plot AP2-26 in the Parish of Hoar Cross as shown on Additional Sheet 1-15G of the Parliamentary Plans accompanying AP2 and will require the nominated undertaker not to exercise the powers of the Bill to take temporary possession of that land.\r\n","Not to exercise powers of compulsory Acquisition","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs Sherwood","2019-03-18","Assurance","West Cottage, Newborough End, Newborough, Burton-upon-Trent, Staffordshire,\r\nDE13 8SR\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C117","Farrington, Mr Garry and Mrs Tina","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C117.1","N/A","N/A","Garry and Tina Farrington","1.1 The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the extent of the Blue Land to be subject to temporary possession under the powers conferred by the Bill, provided this does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the works for the Proposed Scheme for which temporary possession of the Blue Land is required.\r\n1.2 Prior to the date that the Nominated Undertaker enters upon and takes temporary possession of any part of the Blue Land, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult the Property owners regarding the preparation of the Temporary Works Programme.\r\n1.3 The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation under paragraph 1.2 above and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all relevant factors associated with the Temporary Works, seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Property owners to modify the Temporary Works Programme for the purposes of facilitating, during the Temporary Possession Period, the Property owners undertaking of the Specified Operation.\r\n1.4 Nothing in paragraph 1.3 above shall require a modification to the Temporary Works Programme which shall, in the reasonable opinion of the Nominated Undertaker, prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Temporary Works.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Blue Land” means the area of land shown coloured blue on the Plan [attached to beneficiary letter] and located at Barn Farm, Abbots Bromley, Rugeley, WS15 3BB;\r\n“Property owners” means Garry David Farrington and Tina Jane Farrington of Barn Farm, Abbots Bromley, Rugeley, WS15 3BB;\r\n“Plan” means the Plan attached to this assurance [attached to beneficiary letter];\r\n“the Specified Operation” means the operation by the property owners on or from the Blue Land of a forest school for children aged 3 to 12 years old one day per week between the hours of 0900 to 1530 on days during the school term; \r\n“Temporary Possession Period” means the period during which the Nominated Undertaker is in temporary possession of the Blue Land pursuant to the powers conferred by Schedule 15 of the Bill;\r\n“Temporary Works” means any temporary works authorised by the Bill to be constructed and operated by the Nominated Undertaker on or from the Blue Land in connection with the construction of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n“Temporary Works Programme” means a programme for the Temporary Works which shall include information on the sequencing and duration of the Temporary Works during the Temporary Possession Period.\r\n","Temporary Works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Garry and Mrs Tina Farrington ","2019-03-14","Assurance","The land coloured blue on the plan attached to the assurance and located at Barn Farm, Abbots Bromley, Rugeley, WS15 3BB","Stafford Borough"]
["C118","Collyer, Marina, Richard and Doris Potts","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C118.1","N/A","AP2/0053","Marina Collyer, Richard and Doris Potts","1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult the Petitioners regarding the location, within their property, of overhead electricity pylons associated with the proposed grid supply point to the National Grid Parkgate electricity substation. \r\n2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the Petitioners’ responses to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1 and will, so far as reasonably practicable and after taking into account all other relevant factors (including other relevant Undertakings and Assurances associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of the works) seek to reduce the amount of land rendered unusable by the works. \r\n3. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 project, including the Supplementary Environmental Statement 2 and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the works” means the construction within Bill limits of the grid supply point connection to the National Grid Parkgate substation and all works authorised by the Bill in connection therewith.\r\n","Detailed Design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Ms Collyer, assurances 1 to 3 ","2019-04-01","Assurance","Abbots Bromley Road","East Staffordshire"]
["C118.2","N/A","AP2/0053","Marina Collyer, Richard and Doris Potts","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the detailed design of the Wetland Habitat.\r\n1.2. The nominated undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertakings and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works will:\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the detailed design of the Wetland Habitat for the purpose of facilitating the efficient management of the Property for agricultural purposes following the completion of the construction of those works.\r\n1.3. Nothing in this paragraph 1 shall require any modification to the Wetland Habitat which:\r\n1.3.1  gives rise to any new or different significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications; and/or\r\n1.3.2 prejudices the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.4. Any modification to the Wetland Habitat pursuant to this paragraph 1 is subject to the nominated undertaker obtaining any required consents and approvals from the local planning authority for reasonable modifications to the detailed design of the Wetland Habitat provided that such consents can be reasonably implemented, and subject to any approval required under Schedule 17 of the Bill.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Environmental Statement”  means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Marina Collyer, Richard Potts and Doris Potts, owners of the Property, whose petition has been assigned the reference ‘AP2-53’\r\n“the Property” means the Petitioner’s land as shown indicatively outlined in red on the attached plan with drawing reference ‘2PT02-ARP-PT-DSK-000-000003-PET000053’;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n “the Wetland Habitat” means the proposed ‘Wetland habitat creation’ on part of the Petitioner’s Property shown within the land edged red on the attached plan.\r\n\r\n","Detailed Design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Ms Collyer, assurances 1 to 3 ","2019-04-17","Assurance","Orange Lane, Bromley Hurst, Abbots Bromley","East Staffordshire"]
["C119","Goodwin, Brian and Rachel","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C119.1","N/A","AP2/0011","Brian and Rachel Goodwin","1.Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult the Petitioners regarding the location, within their property, of overhead electricity pylons associated with the proposed grid supply point to the National Grid Parkgate electricity substation. \r\n2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the Petitioners’ responses to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1 and will, so far as reasonably practicable and after taking into account all other relevant factors (including other relevant Undertakings and Assurances associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of the works) seek to reduce the amount of land rendered unusable by the works.\r\n3. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 project, including the Supplementary Environmental Statement 2 and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement.\r\n","Detailed design – location of pylons","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Brian and Rachel Goodwin, assurances 1 to 3","2019-04-01","Assurance","Bromley Wood Farm\r\nAbbots Bromley\r\nStaffordshire\r\nWS15 3AG","East Staffordshire"]
["C119.2","N/A","AP2/0011","Brian and Rachel Goodwin","4. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker, during construction of the works, to maintain access to the Petitioners’ land, where reasonably practicable, under controlled conditions where necessary, and without prejudice to the Petitioners’ right to claim disturbance compensation. (See HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper D10: Maintaining Access to Residential and Commercial Property during Construction.)  Similarly, access across or around construction works for livestock and machinery will be provided under controlled conditions where necessary and reasonably practicable, and without prejudice to the rights to disturbance compensation under the Compensation Code.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the works” means the construction within Bill limits of the grid supply point connection to the National Grid Parkgate substation and all works authorised by the Bill in connection therewith.\r\n","Access during construction\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Brian and Rachel Goodwin, assurance 4","2019-04-01","Assurance","Bromley Wood Farm\r\nAbbots Bromley\r\nStaffordshire\r\nWS15 3AG\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C119.3","N/A","AP2/0011","Brian and Rachel Goodwin","1. Notwithstanding the notice requirements under the Bill in relation to the temporary occupation of land (28 days) and outright acquisition of land (3 months), the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to provide longer notice to the Petitioners, where reasonably practicable, than the Bill requires and to use reasonable endeavours, in advance of any formal notification required under the Bill, to advise the Petitioners of the expected quarter of the calendar year in which their land is planned to be occupied temporarily under the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill.\r\n\r\n ","Notices","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Brian Goodwin & Mrs Rachel Goodwin, assurance 1","2019-04-17","Assurance","Bromley Wood Farm\r\nAbbots Bromley\r\nStaffordshire\r\nWS15 3AG\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C119.4","N/A","AP2/0011","Brian and Rachel Goodwin"," \r\n2. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to ensure that the Petitioners are kept informed, both prior to and during the works on their land, about the timetable and programme for those works. \r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the works” means the construction within Bill limits of the overhead line grid supply point connection to the National Grid Parkgate substation and all works authorised by the Bill in connection therewith.\r\n","Programme of works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Brian Goodwin & Mrs Rachel Goodwin, assurance 2","2019-04-17","Assurance","Bromley Wood Farm\r\nAbbots Bromley\r\nStaffordshire\r\nWS15 3AG\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C119.5","N/A","AP2/0011","Brian and Rachel Goodwin","3a. \tThe Secretary of State acknowledges that the Petitioners are currently able to drive across the land subject to temporary possession under the Bill so as to gain access to other parts of their property. The Secretary of State will therefore require the Nominated Undertaker to preserve a suitable form of vehicular access across their land during construction works where reasonably practicable. The route that is used for access across the land may be varied from time to time at the discretion of the Nominated Undertaker and the route would be subject to the Nominated Undertaker’s compliance with health and safety legislation. For the avoidance of any doubt, this assurance shall not give rise to any obligation on the Nominated Undertaker to provide a made up track or road for use by the Petitioner; it is simply intended to ensure that the Petitioners can continue to drive across the fields that are temporarily occupied by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n\r\n3b. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to fence off the immediate construction areas on the Petitioners’ land, at times when the programme gives rise to a prolonged interval between phases of the works on the Petitioners’ land, in order that the Petitioners can use their land during those intervals for the purposes of their agricultural business and to give the Petitioners as much notice as reasonably practicable of such intervals. \r\n\r\n3c. For the avoidance of doubt, in the event that there is likely to be an interruption to the Petitioner’s access across their land during the works the Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to inform the Petitioners prior to this interruption through its engagement with the Petitioners pursuant to the assurance at paragraph 2 above.   \r\n\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill; \r\n“the works” means the construction within Bill limits of the overhead line grid supply point connection to the National Grid Parkgate substation and all works authorised by the Bill in connection therewith.","Preservation of access across, and use of, land required for the works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Brian Goodwin & Mrs Rachel Goodwin, assurance 3","2019-04-17","Assurance","Bromley Wood Farm\r\nAbbots Bromley\r\nStaffordshire\r\nWS15 3AG\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C119.6","N/A","AP2/0011","Brian and Rachel Goodwin","\r\n4. The Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the extent of the Petitioners’ land to be subject to temporary possession under the powers conferred by the Bill, provided this does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the works for which temporary possession of that land is required.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\t\r\n“the works” means the construction within Bill limits of the overhead line grid supply point connection to the National Grid Parkgate substation and all works authorised by the Bill in connection therewith.\r\n","Land required for temporary possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Brian Goodwin & Mrs Rachel Goodwin, assurance 4","2019-04-17","Assurance","Bromley Wood Farm\r\nAbbots Bromley\r\nStaffordshire\r\nWS15 3AG\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C120","Brown, Angela","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C120.1","N/A","AP2/0072","Angela Brown","1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult the Petitioners regarding the location, within their property, of overhead electricity pylons associated with the proposed grid supply point to the National Grid Parkgate electricity substation. \r\n2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the Petitioners’ responses to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1 and will, so far as reasonably practicable and after taking into account all other relevant factors (including other relevant Undertakings and Assurances associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of the works) seek to reduce the amount of land rendered unusable by the works. \r\n3. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the HS2 project, including the Supplementary Environmental Statement 2 and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement. \r\n","Detailed design - location of pylons","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Angela Brown, assurances 1 to 3","2019-04-01","Assurance","South Hill Farm\r\nGlass Lane\r\nAbbots Bromley, Rugeley \r\nStaffordshire\r\nWS15 3BG\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C120.2","N/A","AP2/0072","Angela Brown","4. The Secretary of State will not exercise the compulsory acquisition powers of the Bill over plot AP2-46 in the Parish of Abbots Bromley as shown on Additional Sheet 1-15C of the Parliamentary Plans accompanying AP2 and will require the Nominated Undertaker not to exercise the powers of the Bill to take temporary possession of that land.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the works” means the construction within Bill limits of the grid supply point connection to the National Grid Parkgate substation and all works authorised by the Bill in connection therewith.","Not to exercise powers of compulsory acquisition\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Angela Brown, assurance 4","2019-04-01","Assurance","Plot AP2-46 in the Parish of Abbots Bromley as shown on Additional Sheet 1-15C of the Parliamentary Plans accompanying AP2\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C120.3","N/A","AP2/0072","Angela Brown","1.     The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker when undertaking works in relation to the Parkgate Overhead Line Grid Supply Point Connection to ensure that so far as reasonably practicable those works are undertaken so as to avoid the removal of mature trees along Glass Lane in Abbots Bromley, Rugeley.\r\n2.     Where the removal of a mature tree is unavoidable in relation to the works mentioned at paragraph 1, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to ensure that no more mature trees are removed than is necessary for those works to take place. This is in line with the draft Code of Construction Practice, Section 12.2.3, which states:\r\n“The following measures will be implemented… provision of contractor guidance for working close to retained aged and veteran trees and areas of retained ancient woodland, and watching briefs as appropriate…maintenance of trees on highways which are temporarily stopped as a result of the Proposed Scheme works prior to re-opening (e.g. selective branch removal) following consultation and agreement with the relevant local authority… monitoring of the effectiveness of the tree protection measures throughout the construction period by an appropriately qualified arboricultural consultant”; \r\nand Section 12.3.7, which states: \r\n\"The following measures will be implemented: ... avoidance of unnecessary tree and vegetation removal and protection of existing trees in accordance with BS 5837: Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction.\"\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Parkgate Overhead Line Grid Supply Point Connection” means works to construct an overhead line grid supply point connection to the National Grid Parkgate substation to be authorised by Additional Provision 2\r\n\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill. ","Mature Trees\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Angela Brown, assurances 1 and 2","2019-05-10","Assurance","Glass Lane in Abbots Bromley, Rugeley\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C121","Colwich Parish Council","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C121.1","N/A","AP2/0061","Colwich Parish Council","1.1\tDuring the construction of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, in accordance with the COCP and the Information Paper, to:\r\n1.1.1 clearly identify vehicles over 3.5 tonnes regularly employed on construction of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n1.1.2 ensure that heavy goods vehicle fleets used by Principal Contractors operate in accordance with an approved and audited fleet quality plan, such as but not limited to the Fleet Operator Recognition Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Information Paper” means HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper E8: Vehicle flow management and safety requirements during construction;\r\n“Plan 1” means plan CT-05-212 illustrating the location of the proposed AP2 works to temporarily widen Great Haywood Road.\r\n","Contractor vehicles","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Lennon, Parish Office (Colwich Parish Council), assurance 1","2019-04-02","Assurance","Colwich Parish Council Area","Stafford Borough"]
["C121.2","N/A","AP2/0061","Colwich Parish Council","1.1 Subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below, the Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to provide appropriate signage in relation to HS2 construction traffic at specific locations within the Parish Council Area.\r\n1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are:\r\n1.2.1 that the Parish Council provides the Promoter with satisfactory information on the proposed location of the signage to allow the Promoter to consider whether the location is appropriate;\r\n1.2.2 the Promoter agreeing that the proposed locations are suitable for such signage to be provided and having the necessary rights and consents to erect such signage at the location in question; and\r\n1.2.3 the wording of the signage being agreed by the Promoter. \r\n","Signage \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Lennon (Colwich Parish Council), assurance 1","2019-04-02","Assurance","Colwich Parish Council Area","Stafford Borough"]
["C121.3","N/A","AP2/0061","Colwich Parish Council","1. Following the construction of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reinstate the original road alignment of Great Haywood Road and surrounding hedgerows where Great Haywood Road is proposed to be temporarily widened by the Proposed Scheme as illustrated on Plan 1. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Plan 1” means plan CT-05-212 illustrating the location of the proposed AP2 works to temporarily widen Great Haywood Road.\r\n","Reinstatement","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Lennon (Colwich Parish Council), assurance 1","2019-04-02","Assurance","Great Haywood Road as indicated on CT-05-212, attached to the assurance letter","Stafford Borough"]
["C121.4","N/A","AP2/0061","Colwich Parish Council","1. The Promoter will ensure that, once a year, the Highways Sub Group meeting is widened to include both District and Parish Council representatives, with the agenda set by the invited authorities. The Councils to be invited will be nominated by the highway authorities along the line of route.\r\n1.2. In addition, the Promoter will ensure that papers and minutes of both the Planning Forum and Highways Sub Group are published online and that the Parish Councils are able to request that matters of principle related to traffic, highways and transport matters during construction are addressed by the Highways Sub Group.\r\n","Highways Sub Group\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Lennon (Colwich Parish Council) assurance 1","2019-04-02","Assurance","Colwich Parish Council Area","Stafford Borough"]
["C121.5","N/A","AP2/0061","Colwich Parish Council","1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with Staffordshire County Council in relation to the speed limit on the A51 Lichfield Road between Main Road Great Haywood and Church Lane Hixon and the possibility of a consistent speed limit on this road during the Authorised Works, noting that any decision to modify the speed limit on this road is a matter for Staffordshire County Council.\r\n\r\n","Speed limit \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Lennon (Colwich Parish Council), assurance 1","2019-04-26","Assurance","Colwich Parish Council Area","Stafford Borough"]
["C121.6","N/A","AP2/0061","Colwich Parish Council","2. The Promoter will engage with the Lead Local Flood Authority during the detailed design of the Utility Compound with the aim of reducing the impact of the construction of the Utility Compound on flood risk in the surrounding area as far as reasonably practicable\r\nIn this assurance:- \r\n“Lead Local Flood Authority” means Staffordshire County Council or any successor body which takes over such statutory functions for local flood management for the area; and “Utility Compound” means Main Road Utility Compound as shown on the attached plan (CT-05-212).\r\n\r\n","Flooding \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Lennon, (Colwich Parish Council), assurance 2","2019-04-26","Assurance","Colwich Parish Council Area","Stafford Borough"]
["C121.7","N/A","AP2/0061","Colwich Parish Council","1.1 During the detailed design of the drainage infrastructure of the Proposed Scheme within the Parish of Colwich the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours in the design of the infrastructure to provide for run-off rates and volumes below existing greenfield run-off rates currently discharged into the un-named watercourse illustrated indicatively on the attached plan (CT-06-212) as far as reasonably practicable.","Reducing run-off rates\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Lennon (Colwich Parish Council), assurance 3","2019-04-26","Assurance","Colwich Parish Council Area","Stafford Borough"]
["C121.8","N/A","AP2/0061","Colwich Parish Council","1.  Subject to the conditions in paragraph 2 below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to clear the vegetation obstructing the Pathway and to repair the existing asphalt paving on the Paved Pathway during the Compound Establishment Period. \r\n\r\n2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 above are that:\r\n\r\na. the clearance of vegetation and repair to the existing asphalt paving can be undertaken within the powers and limits of the Bill; \r\n\r\nb. the agreement of the Local Highway Authority to the clearance of the vegetation and the repair to the existing asphalt paving;\r\n  \r\nc. the carrying out of the clearance of vegetation and the repair to the existing asphalt paving can be undertaken without introducing any new or different significant environment impacts from those assessed in the Environmental Statement; and\r\n\r\nd. the carrying out of the clearance of vegetation and the repair to the existing asphalt paving can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed scheme.\r\n\r\n3. Nothing in this assurance shall oblige the nominated undertaker to undertake any clearance, repair or maintenance of the Pathway after the Compound Establishment Period and all responsibility for future maintenance shall remain with the Local Highway Authority.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n\r\n“Compound Establishment Period” means the period of setting up of the Trent South Embankment Main Compound;\r\n\r\n“the Pathway” means that part of the footpath alongside the A51 between Great Hayward and Hixon as is shown edged black on the attached map and as is within the limits of the Bill and the boundary of the highway comprising the Paved Pathway and the Unpaved Pathway; \r\n\r\n“the Paved Pathway” means that part of the Pathway that is currently paved with asphalt; and\r\n\r\n“the Unpaved Pathway” means that part of the Pathway that is not currently paved with asphalt. \r\n","Vegetation obstructing the footpath alongside the A51 between Great Hayward and Hixon","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Lennon (Colwich Parish Council)","2019-06-24","Assurance","The footpath alongside the A51 between Great Hayward and Hixon","Stafford Borough"]
["C121.9","N/A","HoL/0027","Colwich Parish Council","1. During the detailed design of the drainage infrastructure for the Proposed Scheme that is to be located within the Parish of Colwich (“the Drainage Infrastructure”) the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours in the design of the Drainage Infrastructure to provide for run-off rates and volumes below the existing greenfield run-off rates and volumes currently discharged into the Watercourse as far as is reasonably practicable.\r\n2. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, when carrying out the design work for the Drainage Infrastructure as referred to in paragraph 1 above, to:- \r\n(i) undertake such on-site investigations and modelling as is reasonably required in order to compare the greenfield run-off rates and volumes that currently discharge into the Watercourse under the existing drainage system with the greenfield run-off rates and volumes that would be reasonably anticipated to discharge into the Watercourse once the Drainage Infrastructure is operational; and\r\n(ii) to share the information from such on-site investigations and modelling with the Lead Local Flood Authority and the Petitioner in the form of a report.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n\"the Petitioner\" means Colwich Parish Council;\r\n “the Watercourse” means the un-named watercourse that existing run-off is currently discharged which crosses the railway at chainage 204+750 from the north east and crosses the A51 Lichfield road south of the main road junction, the illustrative location of which is shown on the Plan.\r\n\"the Plan\" means the plan attached to this assurance with reference CT-O6-212","Reducing run-off rates\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Lennon (Colwich Parish Council)","2019-08-23","Assurance","The footpath alongside the A51 between Great Hayward and Hixon","Stafford Borough"]
["C121.10","N/A","HoL/0027","Colwich Parish Council","1.  Subject to the conditions in paragraph 2 below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to clear the vegetation obstructing the Pathway and to repair the existing asphalt paving on the Paved Pathway during the Compound Establishment Period. \r\n2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 above are that:\r\n a. the clearance of vegetation and repair to the existing asphalt paving can be undertaken within the powers and limits of the Bill; \r\nb. the agreement of the Local Highway Authority to the clearance of the vegetation and the repair to the existing asphalt paving;\r\nc. the carrying out of the clearance of vegetation and the repair to the existing asphalt paving can be undertaken without introducing any new or different significant environment impacts from those assessed in the Environmental Statement; and\r\nd. the carrying out of the clearance of vegetation and the repair to the existing asphalt paving can be undertaken without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed scheme.\r\n3. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to avoid, so far as reasonably practicable, closing the Pathway, or any part of it, during the construction of the Proposed Scheme and to make good, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Local Highway Authority, any damage to the Pathway attributable to HS2 construction vehicles. \r\n4. Save as provided in paragraph 3, nothing in this assurance shall oblige the nominated undertaker to undertake any clearance, repair or maintenance of the Pathway after the Compound Establishment Period and all responsibility for future maintenance shall remain with the Local Highway Authority.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n\"the Petitioner\" means Colwich Parish Council;\r\n\"the Plan\" means the plan attached to this assurance with reference CT-06-212;\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n “Compound Establishment Period” means the period of setting up of the Trent South Embankment Main Compound;\r\n “HS2 construction vehicles” means those vehicles associated with the construction of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n “the Local Highway Authority” means Staffordshire County Council;\r\n “the Pathway” means that part of the footpath alongside the A51 between Great Hayward and Hixon as is shown edged black on the attached map and as is within the limits of the Bill and the boundary of the highway comprising the Paved Pathway and the Unpaved Pathway; \r\n “the Paved Pathway” means that part of the Pathway that is currently paved with asphalt; and\r\n “the Unpaved Pathway” means that part of the Pathway that is not currently paved with asphalt.\r\n\r\n\r\n","A51 footpath \r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Lennon (Colwich Parish Council), assurances 1 to 4","2019-08-23","Assurance","The footpath alongside the A51 between Great Hayward and Hixon","Stafford Borough"]
["C121.11","N/A","HoL/0027","Colwich Parish Council","1.1.\tThe Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to have regard to traffic impacts at Weetman’s Bridge as a result of HS2 main civil engineering works construction traffic during the preparation of the relevant Local Traffic Management Plan to be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the CoCP and will require that appropriate measures to mitigate such impacts (if any are identified) are considered during the preparation of that Local Traffic Management Plan.\r\n1.2.\tNothing in paragraph 1.1 will require the consideration of measures which:\r\n1.2.1.\tcould not be implemented under the powers contained in the Bill; and/or would prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“CoCP” means the Code of Construction Practice prepared for the Proposed Scheme;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; and\r\n‘Weetman’s Bridge’ means the bridge over the River Trent on Meadow Lane near its junction with the A513 in the county of Staffordshire. \r\n","Local Traffic Management Plan\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Lennon (Colwich Parish Council), ","2019-10-08","Assurance","A513 at the junction of Meadow Lane\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C122","Sant, Mr David and Mrs Susan\t","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A\t","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C122.1","N/A","AP2/0044","Mr David and Mrs Susan Sant","  1.1.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 first being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to reduce the physical extent of the proposed Wetland Habitat Mitigation. \r\n 1.2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n1.2.1.\tthe provision of any such reduction in the extent of the proposed Wetland Habitat Mitigation would be fully in accordance with the existing powers of the Bill (as enacted);\r\n  1.2.2.\tthe provision of any such reduction in the extent of the proposed Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land would not (in the opinion of the Secretary of State)  give rise to any new or different significant effects from those assessed and reported on in the Environmental Statement and would not cause a breach of the Environmental Minimum Requirements; and\r\n 1.2.3.\tthe provision to reduce the extent of the proposed Wetland Habitat Mitigation is not likely to prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n 1.3.\tProvided that:\r\n 1.3.1.\tthe Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n 1.3.1.1. provides that the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land must retain its ecological value in accordance with a monitoring and maintenance regime provided by the Secretary of State; and\r\n1.3.1.2.\t provides for the maintenance of the Wetland Habitat Mitigation to be provided on the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land; and\r\n 1.3.2.\tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the Wetland Habitat Mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation on the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land; and\r\n 1.3.3.\tthere are no legal and/or other impediments to the Petitioners or owners entering into and thereafter complying with an agreement referred to in paragraph 1.3.1  above which may prejudice the construction and/or maintenance of the Wetland Habitat Mitigation, the Secretary of State shall enter into such appropriate arrangements to allow the Petitioner to graze the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land in accordance with the terms of the above agreement.”\r\n“In this assurance:-\r\n “the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017;                                            \r\n “Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited at Parliament with the Bill;\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n “the Petitioner” means David and Susan Sant (HS2-AP2: 044);\r\n “Wetland Habitat Mitigation” means wetland habitat mitigation to be undertaken and maintained on the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land pursuant to the Bill, as enacted;\r\n “Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land” means the land shown in Yellow on Plan 1 attached to this assurance;\r\n","Wetland habitat mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company)","2019-04-04","Assurance","Chorlton Green Farm, Chapel Chorlton, Newcastle under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 5JN","Stafford Borough"]
["C122.2","N/A","AP2/0044","Mr David and Mrs Susan Sant"," 1.1.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 first being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to reduce the physical extent of the proposed Wetland Habitat Mitigation by locating it on the land affected (shown indicatively in blue on the attached plan)\r\n1.2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n1.2.1.\tthe provision of any such reduction in the extent of the proposed Wetland Habitat Mitigation would be fully in accordance with the existing powers of the Bill (as enacted);\r\n 1.2.2.\tthe provision of any such reduction in the extent of the proposed Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land would not (in the opinion of the Secretary of State) give rise to any new or different significant effects from those assessed and reported on in the Environmental Statement and would not cause a breach of the Environmental Minimum Requirements; and\r\n 1.2.3.\tthe provision to reduce the extent of the proposed Wetland Habitat Mitigation is not likely to prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n 1.3.\tProvided that:\r\n 1.3.1.\tthe Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n 1.3.1.1. provides that the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land must retain its ecological value in accordance with a monitoring and maintenance regime provided by the Secretary of State; and\r\n1.3.1.2. provides for the maintenance of the Wetland Habitat Mitigation to be provided on the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land; and\r\n 1.3.2.\tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the Wetland Habitat Mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation on the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land; and\r\n 1.3.3.\tthere are no legal and/or other impediments to the Petitioners or owners entering into and thereafter complying with an agreement referred to in paragraph 1.3.1  above which may prejudice the construction and/or maintenance of the Wetland Habitat Mitigation, the Secretary of State shall enter into such appropriate arrangements to allow the Petitioner to graze the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land in accordance with the terms of the above agreement.”\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n “the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017;\r\n“Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited at Parliament with the Bill;\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n “the Petitioner” means David and Susan Sant (HS2-AP2: 044);\r\n “Wetland Habitat Mitigation” means wetland habitat mitigation to be undertaken and maintained on the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land pursuant to the Bill, as enacted;\r\n “Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land” means the land shown in Yellow on Plan 1 attached to this assurance;\r\n “Environmental Minimum Requirements” means as defined at Paragraph 4.4 of HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper E1: Control of Environmental Impacts (as amended from time to time).\r\n\r\n","Wetland habitat mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry and Company)","2019-05-07","Assurance","Chorlton Green Farm, Chapel Chorlton, Newcastle under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 5JN","Stafford Borough"]
["C123","Swynnerton Parish Council","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C123.1","N/A","AP2/0045","Swynnerton Parish Council","1.1.\tSubject to the conditions at paragraph 1.3, in exercising the powers in the Bill, the Promoter will maintain reasonable pedestrian access to the Newcastle Road Properties and the Whitmore Road Properties during the construction of the Proposed Scheme. \r\n1.2.\tSubject to the conditions at paragraph 1.3, in exercising the powers in the Bill, the Promoter will not prevent vehicular access to the Newcastle Road Properties and the Whitmore Road Properties during the construction of the Proposed Scheme where reasonably practicable. If vehicular access is to be prevented, the Promoter will liaise with the owners and/or occupiers of the Newcastle Road Properties and Whitmore Road Properties to ensure that any disruption is reduced so far as reasonably practicable.\r\n1.3. The conditions mentioned above are that the Promoter will not be required to maintain access in the case of emergency or in circumstances that are outside of its control. \r\n1.4  The Promoter will engage with the local highway authority and Highways England regarding the introduction of an appropriate speed limit and enforcement measures on the A519 Newcastle Road between the Hanchurch Interchange and the junction with the B5038 Whitmore Road during the period in which that part of the road is used by HS2 Large Goods Vehicles, as well as on the appropriate permanent speed limit and enforcement measures that would be put in place once the works are completed. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Exempt Vehicle”\tmeans certain Large Goods Vehicles that may be exempted on the grounds of specialism, unforeseen circumstances or triviality. Further information on exemptions is set out in Appendix B to the Information Paper E14; \r\n“Large Goods Vehicles”\thas the same meaning as given in paragraph 6(9) of Part 1 of Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n“Newcastle Road Properties ”\tmeans 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 17, 19, 21, 25, 29, 31, 33 Newcastle Road in the Parish of Swynnerton;\r\n“Petitioners”\tmeans together Swynnerton Parish Council (AP2-045) and the Newcastle Road Residents (HS2-AP2-075);\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; and\r\n“Whitmore Road Properties” means 122 and 152 Whitmore Road in the Parish of Swynnerton.","Construction Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Harrington-Jones, Clerk, Swynnerton Parish Council, assurance 1","2019-04-05","Assurance","Newcastle Road, Clayton, Newcastle-under-Lyme ST5 4DQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C123.2","N/A","AP2/0045","Swynnerton Parish Council","2.1. During the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme the Promoter will engage with the local highway authority and Highways England (so far as relevant) to seek to address the Petitioners’ safety concerns in relation to the A500 Queensway and the A519 Newcastle Road in the Parish of Swynnerton. \r\n2.2. The Promoter will during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme require that any means of pedestrian access across the A500 Queensway to be provided as part of the Proposed Scheme in the Parish of Swynnerton meets required standards of safety.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Petitioners” means together Swynnerton Parish Council (AP2-045) and the Newcastle Road Residents (HS2-AP2-075)\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.","Operational Access and Safety","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Harrington-Jones, Clerk, Swynnerton Parish Council, assurance 2","2019-04-05","Assurance","Newcastle Road, Clayton, Newcastle-under-Lyme ST5 4DQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C123.3","N/A","AP2/0045","Swynnerton Parish Council","3.1. The Promoter will provide a replacement for the existing footpath at the junction of the proposed left turn lane to be constructed as part of the Proposed Scheme at the junction of the A519 Newcastle Road and the A500 Queensway for the purposes of providing pedestrian access during the operation of the Proposed Scheme, subject to any required consent or approval of the relevant highway authority. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.","A159 Newcastle Road/A500 Queensway Footway","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Harrington-Jones, Clerk, Swynnerton Parish Council, assurance 3","2019-04-05","Assurance","Newcastle Road, Clayton, Newcastle-under-Lyme ST5 4DQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C123.4","N/A","AP2/0045","Swynnerton Parish Council","5.1 The Promoter will require that HS2 Large Goods Vehicles that are used in connection with the construction of the Proposed Scheme in the Parish of Swynnerton are powered by EURO VI (or lower emission) engines, unless it is an Exempt Vehicle.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Exempt Vehicle” means certain Large Goods Vehicles that may be exempted on the grounds of specialism, unforeseen circumstances or triviality. Further information on exemptions is set out in Appendix B to the Information Paper E14; \r\n“Large Goods Vehicles”\thas the same meaning as given in paragraph 6(9) of Part 1 of Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.","Euro VI Engines ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Harrington-Jones, Clerk, Swynnerton Parish Council, assurance 5","2019-04-05","Assurance","Newcastle Road, Clayton, Newcastle-under-Lyme ST5 4DQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C123.5","N/A","AP2/0045","Swynnerton Parish Council","4.1 The Promoter will during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme use reasonable endeavours to retain the Ferndown Local Nature Reserve (Ferndown LNR) Balancing Pond if it is affected by the Proposed Scheme. \r\n4.2 If the Ferndown LNR Balancing Pond is affected, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to replace the functionality of the drainage associated with the Ferndown LNR Balancing Pond on a like for like basis, where reasonably practicable. \r\n4.3 If the Ferndown LNR Balancing Pond is to be replaced, it will be provided within the area of proposed woodland habitat enhancement. This woodland habitat enhancement is approximately 0.6ha and located within the Ferndown LNR land holding.\r\n4.4 The assurance in 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 is subject to:\r\n4.4.1 the Bill conferring all necessary powers and consents required in order to provide the  replacement of the Ferndown LNR Balancing Pond;\r\n4.4.2 the consents and approval of the owner of Ferndown LNR and Ferndown LNR Balancing Pond;\r\n4.4.3 that any replacement will not create any new or different significant environmental effects than those assessed in the Additional Provision 2 and Supplementary Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill; and\r\n4.4.4 that the Ferndown LNR Balancing Pond can be relocated without prejudicing the safety, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme. \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“owner of Ferndown LNR and Ferndown LNR Balancing Pond” means Stafford Borough Council and any other parties responsible for the maintenance, management and monitoring of the current Ferndown LNR Balancing Pond.\r\n\r\n","Ferndown Local Nature Reserve Balancing Pond","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Harrington-Jones, Clerk, Swynnerton Parish Council","2019-04-26","Assurance","Newcastle Road, Clayton, Newcastle-under-Lyme ST5 4DQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C123.6","N/A","AP2/0045","Swynnerton Parish Council","1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the relevant highway authority regarding the re-provision of an appropriate means of crossing from the A519 Newcastle Road to the A519 Clayton Road in accordance with the requirements of DMRB TD51/17 and, subject to the conditions in paragraph 2, will require the nominated undertaker to provide such a crossing.\r\n2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are:\r\ni)\tThe nominated undertaker obtaining any necessary permissions, consents and approvals, including any approval or agreement of the relevant local planning authority and the relevant highway authority;\r\nii)\tIf applicable, the nominated undertaker securing the necessary rights over any additional land required for the provision of a crossing;\r\niii)\tThe nominated undertaker being satisfied that the provision of a crossing would not prejudice  the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\niv)\tThe nominated undertaker being satisfied that the provision of a crossing can be accommodated within the programme of the Proposed Scheme as it pertains to the changes at Hanchurch Interchange; and\r\nv)\tThe successful promotion of Additional Provision 2.”\r\nIn this assurance: - \r\n“DMRB TD51/17” means Design Manual for Roads and Bridges, Volume 6, Section 3, Part 5 Traffic Design 51/17 Segregated Left Turn Lanes and Subsidiary Deflection Islands at Roundabouts. \r\n\r\n","Appropriate means of crossing","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mrs Harrington-Jones, Clerk, Swynnerton Parish Council, assurances 1 to 2","2019-05-01","Assurance","Newcastle Road, Clayton, Newcastle-under-Lyme ST5 4DQ","Stafford Borough"]
["C124","West Midland Bird Club\t","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C124.1","N/A","AP2/0059","West Midland Bird Club","1.1\tThe Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker prior to the construction of the Parkgate Grid Supply Point Connection, to develop a species-specific assessment of bird collision risk from the siting of the overhead lines in the vicinity of Blithfield Reservoir SSSI.  \r\nThis assessment will include consideration of the following measures: \r\n1.1.1\tappropriate surveys for all bird species that are relevant to the designation of Blithfield Reservoir SSSI; and\r\n1.1.2\trecommendations for the installation of bird diverters where detailed survey work shows installation will be required in accordance with National Policy Statement for Electricity Networks EN-5 2011.\r\n1.2\tPrior to the completion of the methodology for the surveys referred to at paragraph 1.1.1, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the methodology of those surveys and to have regard to the responses received.\r\n1.3\tThe Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to seek to involve the Petitioner’s members in the carrying out the surveys referred to at paragraph 1.1.1 to the extent that the nominated undertaker deems the Petitioner’s members to be appropriate persons for the purposes of being involved in those surveys having regard to the nature and purpose of those surveys and the relevant qualifications and experience of those members.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Parkgate Grid Supply Point Connection” means the replacement of the grid supply point connection at Rugeley, with a new permanent grid supply point connection between a new National Grid Parkgate substation and the Newlands Lane auto-transformer feeder station (AP2-001-015) using overhead lines required in connection with the construction of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n“Petitioner” means the West Midlands Bird Club whose petition to the Bill has been given the reference ‘AP2-059’;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Bird electrocution/collision risk\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2)to David Jackson, assurance 1","2019-04-17","Assurance","Blithfield Reservoir, Waters Road, Abbots Bromley, Rugeley WS15 3DU\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C124.2","N/A","AP2/0059","West Midland Bird Club","2.\tThe Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker during the detailed design and construction of the Parkgate Grid Supply Point Connection to limit the loss of floodplain grazing marsh and associated habitats alongside the River Blithe in the vicinity of Little Blithe habitat (as described in Supplementary Environmental Statement 2) to no more than that reasonably required to implement the Proposed Scheme.  Where this habitat is lost as a result of construction of the Parkgate Grid Supply Point Connection, the nominated undertaker will be required to implement habitat creation and reinstatement measures to compensate for the loss of floodplain grazing marsh habitat so far as doing so can be done:\r\na.\twithin the existing powers of the Bill and without the need for any additional land from that identified on the deposited plans as within the limits of land to be acquired or used for the purposes of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n b.\twithout introducing any new or different significant environmental effects; and\r\nc.\twithout prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Parkgate Grid Supply Point Connection” means the replacement of the grid supply point connection at Rugeley, with a new permanent grid supply point connection between a new National Grid Parkgate substation and the Newlands Lane auto-transformer feeder station (AP2-001-015) using overhead lines required in connection with the construction of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Supplementary Environmental Statement 2” means HS2 Environmental Impact Assessment deposited with Additional Provision 2 (February 2019).","Bird forage impact - floodplain grazing marsh alongside River Blithe\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Jackson, assurance 2","2019-04-08","Assurance","Blithfield Reservoir, Waters Road, Abbots Bromley, Rugeley WS15 3DU\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C124.3","N/A","AP2/0059","West Midland Bird Club","1 The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to install bird diverters on the pylon wires across the valley sections between the National Grid Parkgate Substation and the Newlands Lane Auto-Transformer Feeder Station, and the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to act on the recommendations of the Petitioner regarding the most appropriate sections on which to place such diverters.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Parkgate Grid Supply Point Connection” means the replacement of the grid supply point connection at Rugeley, with a new  permanent grid supply point connection between a new National Grid Parkgate substation and the Newlands Lane  auto-transformer feeder station (AP2-001-015) using overhead lines  required in connection with the construction of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n“Petitioner” means the West Midlands Bird Club whose petition against the Bill has been given the reference ‘AP2-059’;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; and\r\n“Secretary of State” means the Secretary of State for Transport.”\r\n","Bird electrocution/collision risk\r\n\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to David Jackson","2019-06-24","Assurance","Blithfield Reservoir, Waters Road, Abbots Bromley, Rugeley WS15 3DU\r\n\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C125","Sadler, Marion, Hannah and John, Executor for Doreen Round","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C125.1","N/A","AP2/0020","Marion, John, Hannah Sadler, Executor for Doreen Round","1.1. In carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State shall, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below, require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reduce and/or reconfigure the Temporary Material Stockpile located within the Property so far as reasonably practicable, with the aiming of reducing the amount of agricultural land used for the Temporary Material Stockpile. \r\n 1.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n 1.2.1.     any proposed reduction or reconfiguration of the Temporary Material Stockpile does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n1.2.2.\tany proposed reduction or reconfiguration of the Temporary Material Stockpile does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n 1.2.3.\tany proposed reduction or reconfiguration of the Temporary Material Stockpile receives any required approval from the local planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“Property” means Land Parcel AP2-58 Parish of Kings Bromley; \r\n“Temporary Material Stockpile” means an area where materials excavated during construction of the scheme will be stored temporarily before being reused as shown indicatively edged in blue on Plan C attached to these assurances;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Temporary material stockpile\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Marion, John and Hannah Sadler, assurance 1","2019-04-09","Assurance","Ashton Hays Farm, Tuppenhurst Lane, Handsacre, WS15 4HN","Lichfield District"]
["C125.2","N/A","AP2/0020","Marion, John, Hannah Sadler, Executor for Doreen Round","1.1. Subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to relocate the proposed landscape mitigation planting from the Red Land to the Yellow Land.\r\n 1.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n 1.2.1.    the Secretary of State is satisfied that the relocation of the landscape mitigation planting can be delivered on the Yellow Land without giving rise to any new or different significant effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill;\r\n 1.2.2.\tthe relocation of the landscape mitigation planting can be delivered on the Yellow Land within the existing powers of the Bill; and\r\n 1.2.3.\tthe Yellow Land is sufficient to accommodate the entirety of the landscape mitigation planting intended for the Red Land.\r\n 1.3. The Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to provide the Access Gate as part of the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme provided that the Access Gate can be delivered without giving rise to any new of different significant effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement accompanying the Bill and can be provided within the existing powers of the Bill. \r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Petitioner” means Marion Kathryn Sadler, John Allan Sadler, Hannah Kathryn Sadler, Executor of Doreen Round;\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited at Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“Property” means Land Parcel AP2-58 Parish of Kings Bromley; \r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Temporary Material Stockpile” means an area where materials excavated during construction of the scheme will be stored temporarily before being reused as shown indicatively edged in blue on plan C attached to these assurances;\r\n “Access Gate” means a gated access point between fields to be provided to allow the Petitioner to move between the fields shown indicatively on Plan A attached to these assurances;\r\n “the Red Land” means the land shown shaded red on Plan A attached to these assurances;\r\n“the Yellow Land” means the land shown shaded yellow on Plan A attached to these assurances;\r\n“the Mature Trees” means the area of mature trees adjacent to Ashton Hays Farm, Tuppenhurst Lane, Handsacre as illustrated edged black on Plan A attached to these assurances and located at grid reference E5 and F6 on plan CT-06-130b as deposited with the Bill;  \r\n“the Grassland Habitat” means the areas of grassland habitat proposed for the benefit of Great Crested Newts as edged blue on Plan A attached to these assurances and located at grid reference E5 and F6 on plan CT-06-130b as deposited with the Bill; \r\n“the Farm Land” means land shown edged red on Plan B attached to these assurances, but not including land edged in blue on Plan B attached to these assurances;\r\n“the Land” means the land shown edged blue on Plan B attached to these assurances.","Landscape mitigation planting and access between fields\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Marion, John and Hannah Sadler, assurance 2","2019-04-09","Assurance","Ashton Hays Farm, Tuppenhurst Lane, Handsacre,WS15 4HN \r\n","Lichfield District"]
["C125.3","N/A","AP2/0020","Marion, John, Hannah Sadler, Executor for Doreen Round","1.1. The Nominated Undertaker will identify with the Petitioner existing drainage arrangements on the Farm Land. This will include the carrying out, where reasonable, of inspections of the site and of any existing plans.\r\n 1.2. The location of drains cut or disturbed by the construction works will be recorded by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n 1.3. The Nominated Undertaker will utilise appropriate drainage consultants to advise on drainage works and will engage with the Petitioner in respect of the pre and post drainage schemes that are required. The Nominated Undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to engage drainage consultants with working knowledge of the local conditions.\r\n 1.4. Prior to the commencement of significant construction works in the Proposed Scheme, land drains affected by the HS2 works will, where practicable, be intercepted in a manner which maintains their efficiency. Work will be carried out to an appropriate specification after discussion with the Petitioner which may include the design (e.g. layout, falls, pipe sizes and types, outfall arrangements) and timing of any land drainage works required.\r\n 1.5. As-built plans of modifications to existing land drainage and of any new drainage works in the Proposed Scheme will be provided to the Petitioner as appropriate by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n 1.6. Where natural drainage patterns are adversely affected by the HS2 works in the Proposed Scheme, the provision of supplementary drainage or irrigation works will be considered having regard to an assessment of compensation and the commercial justification by the Petitioner.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Farm Land” means land shown edged red on Plan B attached to these assurances, but not including land edged in blue on Plan B attached to these assurances;\r\n“the Land” means the land shown edged blue on Plan B attached to these assurances.\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Marion Kathryn Sadler, John Allan Sadler, Hannah Kathryn Sadler, Executor of Doreen Round;\r\n\"the nominated undertaker\" refers to the body or bodies appointed by the Secretary of State to exercise the powers conferred by the Bill to construct and maintain the Proposed Scheme. The Nominated Undertaker may be HS2 Ltd, or it may be another body or bodies appointed to oversee the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n","Drainage\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Marion, John and Hannah Sadler, assurance 3","2019-04-09","Assurance","Ashton Hays Farm, Tuppenhurst Lane, Handsacre, WS15 4HN\r\n","Lichfield District"]
["C125.4","N/A","AP2/0020","Marion, John, Hannah Sadler, Executor for Doreen Round","1.1. In carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State shall, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below, require the Nominated Undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reconfigure the proposed Grassland Habitat in order to retain the Mature Trees so far as is reasonably practicable in the construction of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.2. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n1.2.1.  the Grassland Habitat can be reconfigured and accommodated within the existing powers of the Bill and does not require any additional land or powers to those current provided for within the Bill; \r\n1.2.2.   any proposed reconfiguration of the Grassland Habitat and retention of the Mature Trees does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n1.2.3.   any proposed reconfiguration of the Grassland Habitat and retention of the Mature Trees receives any required approval from the local planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n1.2.4.\tthe reconfiguration of the Grassland Habitat and retention of the Mature Trees does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Mature Trees” means the area of mature trees adjacent to Ashton Hays Farm, Tuppenhurst Lane, Handsacre as illustrated edged black on Plan A attached to these assurances and located at grid reference E5 and F6 on plan CT-06-130b as deposited with the Bill;  \r\n“the Grassland Habitat” means the areas of grassland habitat proposed for the benefit of Great Crested Newts as edged blue on Plan A attached to these assurances and located at grid reference E5 and F6 on plan CT-06-130b as deposited with the Bill; \r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n\"the nominated undertaker\" refers to the body or bodies appointed by the Secretary of State to exercise the powers conferred by the Bill to construct and maintain the Proposed Scheme. The Nominated Undertaker may be HS2 Ltd, or it may be another body or bodies appointed to oversee the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n\"Environmental Statement\" means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited at Parliament with the Bill.","Retention of trees\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Marion, John and Hannah Sadler, assurance 4","2019-04-09","Assurance"," Ashton Hays Farm, Tuppenhurst Lane, Handsacre, WS15 4HN ","Lichfield District"]
["C126","Brandon, Anthony, Dawn and Joanne","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C126.1","N/A","AP2/0001","Anthony, Dawn and Joanne Brandon","1.1. Subject to paragraph 1.2 below, the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill over the Property but instead the nominated undertaker may exercise the powers of Schedule 15 to the Bill to enter and take temporary possession of the Property.\r\n1.2. If the Secretary of State exercises powers of temporary possession under Schedule 15 to the Bill, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to discuss with the Owner the temporary use of the Property with a view to reducing the impact of the Authorised Works on the Property where reasonably practicable and without adversely affecting the construction programme and/or the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“the Authorised Works” means the works authorised under the Bill; \r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Owner” means Anthony, Dawn and Joanne Brandon; \r\n“the Property” means the part of 5 Ford Way, Armitage, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 4BX as shown edged blue on the attached Plan. \r\n","Temporary possession","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Anthony, Dawn and Joanne Brandon","2019-04-09","Assurance","5 Ford Way, Armitage, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 4BX as shown edged blue on the attached Plan ","Lichfield District"]
["C127","St Modwen Developments Limited","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C127.1","N/A","AP2/0016","St Modwen Developments Limited","1. The Secretary of State will not exercise powers of compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill over the Petitioner’s interest in the Land, provided that:\r\n a. the Petitioner grants all necessary rights of access and egress over Parcel AP2-75 and that part of the private access road within Parcel AP2-77, or over other land within the ownership of the Petitioner for construction and maintenance of the Proposed Scheme as required by and in a form acceptable to the Secretary of State. Such rights to be in common with the Petitioner subject to the ability of the Petitioner to provide an alternative route of access at the Land in the event of redevelopment;\r\n b. the Petitioner, as freeholder of Parcel AP2-77, consents to arrangements agreed between the Secretary of State and the leaseholder for construction of the Proposed Works over that part of Parcel AP2-77 which do not comprise the continuation of the private access road in a form that is reasonably acceptable to the Secretary of State and in the absence of agreement with the leaseholder the nominated undertaker may exercise powers of temporary occupation under the Bill over that part of Parcel AP2- 77 to construct the Proposed Works; \r\nc. the Petitioner enters into a prior agreement with the Secretary of State granting the above rights on terms which include consideration for the rights but which do not exceed the overall cost of acquisition and subsequent disposal and which provide for the Secretary of State to reimburse the Petitioner’s reasonably incurred professional costs and fees in entering such an agreement; and\r\n d. in the event that the Petitioner disposes of the Land, the Petitioner procures a direct covenant from any transferee to observe and maintain the rights granted by the Petitioner to the Secretary of State in order to facilitate the construction, operation and maintenance of the Proposed Scheme in accordance with the above terms.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands- Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017;\r\n“the Land” means land parcels AP2-75 and AP2-77 as shown on AP2 Bill plan No. 1-43B (attached);\r\n“the Petitioner” means St Modwen Developments Limited of Park Point, 17 High Street, Longbridge, Birmingham, B31 2UQ;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Rights of access and egress ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Vicky Fowler (Gowling WLG (UK) LLP)","2019-05-01","Assurance","Land parcels AP2-75 and AP2-77 as shown on AP2 Bill plan No. 1-43B","Off Route"]
["C128","Daw, Michael James, Mavis Elizabeth Daw, Eleanor Rosemary Madeleine Daw and Samuel Thomas James Daw","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C128.1","N/A","AP2/0013","Michael James Daw, Mavis Elizabeth Daw, Eleanor Rosemary Madeleine Daw and Samuel Thomas James Daw","1.1. Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult with the Petitioners regarding the detailed design of works proposed to be constructed upon any part of the Farm Land under the powers of the Bill and the use of land for the provision of ecological and any other mitigation that does not involve the construction of works. \r\n1.2. The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertaking and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works and other ecological or other mitigation, \r\n1.2.1.    seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and \r\n1.2.2.    seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioners to modify the detailed design of the works or provision of other ecological mitigation for the facilitating of the efficient management of the Farm Land following the completion of construction of the works. \r\n1.3. In this assurance, “works” means the construction within Bill limits of the noise bund and landscape mitigation planting required for Phase 2A purposes. \r\n1.4. Nothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the works which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement for the Proposed Scheme but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n “the Petitioners” mean Michael James Daw, Mavis Elizabeth Daw, Eleanor Rosemary Madelaine Daw and Samuel Thomas James Daw;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“the Farm Land” means Woodhouse Farm, Pipe Lane, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL;\r\n“the Land” means the land forming the northern slope of the Noise Bund to the north of the Railway Security Fencing including the Drainage;\r\n“the Drainage” means the drainage system comprising land drains and ditches on the Land but not including the Railway Drainage;\r\n“the Noise Bund” means the noise bund to be provided at Woodhouse Farm as shown indicatively on plan CT-06-205 in of the Supplementary Environmental Statement 2 and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement CA1 Fradley to Colton map book marked as SES-001-005; \r\n “the Railway Drainage” means any element of the drainage system provided for the purposes of draining the track and its associated infrastructure;\r\n “the Railway Security Fencing” means the railway security fencing to be erected on the Noise Bund, the location of which shall be the subject of an approval under Schedule 17 to the Bill and shall take into account relevant railway industry safety standards and which will be designed to meet the operational, maintenance, safety, and security requirements of Phase 2a of HS2 and ensure that the Environmental Minimum Requirements are met.   \r\n\r\n","Detailed Design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Charles Meynell,    (Fisher German), assurance 1","2019-04-16","Assurance","Woodhouse Farm, Pipe Lane, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C128.2","N/A","AP2/0013","Michael James Daw, Mavis Elizabeth Daw, Eleanor Rosemary Madeleine Daw and Samuel Thomas James Daw","1.1.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 1.3. below and the Petitioner entering into an agreement with the Secretary of State on terms satisfactory to the Secretary of State and which includes the provisions in paragraph 1.2. below, the Secretary of State shall grant the Petitioner the necessary rights to allow the Petitioner to manage the Land and Drainage following the acquisition of the Land by the Secretary of State. \r\n 1.2. The provisions referred to in paragraph 1.1 above are that the agreement:\r\n 1.2.1 provides for the ongoing management and maintenance by the Petitioner of the landscape mitigation planting to be provided on the Land under the Bill and the Drainage;\r\n 1.2.2\trestricts removal or interference with land or works adjoining the railway which are to provide support or protection to the railway along with any other suitable protections, restrictions or obligations necessary to protect the integrity of the Noise Bund and/or the railway and associated infrastructure including the Railway Drainage;\r\n 1.2.3\tprovides for the Secretary of State to have rights of access to the Land and the Drainage to undertake any required maintenance works or in the case of an emergency and over the Land to the Railway Drainage; and\r\n 1.2.4\tprovides for the Secretary of State to access the Land and Drainage in the event of default or non-compliance with any terms of the agreement by the Petitioner to carry out the management, maintenance or works required and for the Secretary of State to recover the costs of undertaking such works.\r\n 1.3 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1. are that:\r\n 1.3.1 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the landscape mitigation planting required to be provided on the Land, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of the mitigation; and\r\n 1.3.2 the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Petitioner can manage the Land and Drainage without prejudicing the safety or the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme or the integrity of the Drainage. \r\n 1.4 Nothing in this assurance shall prevent the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred by the Bill over the Land.”       \r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Petitioners” mean Michael James Daw, Mavis Elizabeth Daw, Eleanor Rosemary Madelaine Daw and Samuel Thomas James Daw;\r\n“the Farm Land” means Woodhouse Farm, Pipe Lane, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL;\r\n“the Land” means the land forming the northern slope of the Noise Bund to the north of the Railway Security Fencing including the Drainage;\r\n“the Drainage” means the drainage system comprising land drains and ditches on the Land but not including the Railway Drainage;\r\n“the Noise Bund” means the noise bund to be provided at Woodhouse Farm as shown indicatively on plan CT-06-205 in of the Supplementary Environmental Statement 2 and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement CA1 Fradley to Colton map book marked as SES-001-005; \r\n “the Railway Drainage” means any element of the drainage system provided for the purposes of draining the track and its associated infrastructure;\r\n “the Railway Security Fencing” means the railway security fencing to be erected on the Noise Bund, the location of which shall be the subject of an approval under Schedule 17 to the Bill and shall take into account relevant railway industry safety standards and which will be designed to meet the operational, maintenance, safety, and security requirements of Phase 2a of HS2 and ensure that the Environmental Minimum Requirements are met.  \r\n\r\n","Management of bund and drainage arrangements \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Charles Meynell, (Fisher German) assurance 2","2019-04-16","Assurance","Woodhouse Farm, Pipe Lane, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C128.3","N/A","AP2/0013","Michael James Daw, Mavis Elizabeth Daw, Eleanor Rosemary Madeleine Daw and Samuel Thomas James Daw","1.1\tIn carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State shall, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 below, require the nominated undertaker to:\r\n 1.1.1\tengage with the Petitioner regarding the configuration of the Temporary Material Stockpile;\r\n 1.1.2\tuse reasonable endeavours to reduce and/or reconfigure the Temporary Material Stockpile located within the Property so far as reasonably practicable, with the aim of reducing the amount of agricultural land used for the Temporary Material Stockpile. \r\n 1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n 1.2.1\tany proposed reduction or reconfiguration of the Temporary Material Stockpile does not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement deposited with the Bill;\r\n 1.2.2\tany proposed reduction or reconfiguration of the Temporary Material Stockpiles does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n 1.2.3\tany proposed reduction or reconfiguration of the Temporary Material Stockpiles receives any required approval from the local planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands-  Crewe)  Bill  as  deposited  in  the  House  of  Commons on 17 July 2017;\r\n“Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited at Parliament with the Bill;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Michael James Daw and Mavis Elizabeth Daw of Woodhouse Farm, Pipe Lane, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL;\r\n “Property” means Land Parcel 63 Parish of Mavesyn Ridware as illustrated on the plan No. 1-13 as deposited at Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; and\r\n“Temporary Material Stockpile” means an area where materials excavated during construction of the Proposed Scheme will be stored temporarily before being reused as indicated on the attached plan CT-05-205.\r\n","Temporary Material Stockpile\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Charles Meynell  (Fisher German)","2019-08-15","Assurance","Woodhouse Farm, Pipe Lane, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C128.4","N/A","AP2/0013","Michael James Daw, Mavis Elizabeth Daw, Eleanor Rosemary Madeleine Daw and Samuel Thomas James Daw","1. Subject to the conditions in paragraph 7 below, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours in carrying out the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to:- \r\n1.1. provide for the Sleeve at the position marked in red on Plan A, and relocate the Woodland Mitigation to the area shown edged pink on Plan B, for the purposes of accommodating the proposed Reed Bed System and in order to facilitate the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding; and  \r\n1.2. continue to engage with the Petitioner during both the detailed design and delivery stages of the Proposed Scheme regarding the design parameters and plans for implementation of the Reed Bed System and any required associated infrastructure. \r\n2. Subject to paragraph 3, the Petitioners agree that they will pay for any works required in relation to the Reed Bed System, whether those works are undertaken by themselves or the nominated undertaker.  \r\n7. The conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that:- \r\n7.1. the nominated undertaker is able to secure all necessary consents for delivering the relocation of the Woodland Mitigation as described in paragraph 1.1, following Royal Assent;  \r\n7.2. the Secretary of State is freehold owner of the land edged pink on Plan B, in order to allow for the proposed relocation of the Woodland Mitigation;  \r\n7.3. the proposed provision of the Sleeve, the installation of the Reed Bed System or the relocation of the Woodland Mitigation does not create any new or different significant environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement;  \r\n7.4. the proposed provision of the Sleeve, the installation of the Reed Bed System and the relocation of the Woodland Mitigation does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n7.5. the proposed provision of the Sleeve, the installation of the Reed Bed System and the relocation of the Woodland Mitigation receives any required approval from the local planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill; and \r\n7.6. the maintenance responsibilities, fencing layout and access arrangements for the proposed provision of the Sleeve, the Woodland Mitigation and Reed Bed System (agreed pursuant to paragraph 6) do not prejudice the safety and/or security of the operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn this assurance:  \r\n“Reed Bed System” means a drainage system intended for the purposes of treating water runoff from potato washing;  \r\n“Sleeve” means a sleeve of appropriate material and size intended to contain a pipe, for the purposes of facilitating the installation and/or operation of the Reed Bed System, to be provided in the position marked for indicative purposes only on Plan A; \r\n“Woodland Mitigation” means the creation of woodland mitigation under the powers of the Bill at the Property, as labelled on Plan A.  \r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;  \r\n“Plan A” means Plan CT-06-205 attached to this assurance;  \r\n“Plan B” means Plan CT-06-204 attached to this assurance; \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Reed Bed System\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Charles Meynell  (Fisher German), assurances 1, 2 and 7","2020-07-09","Assurance","Woodhouse Farm, Pipe Lane, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C128.5","N/A","AP2/0013","Michael James Daw, Mavis Elizabeth Daw, Eleanor Rosemary Madeleine Daw and Samuel Thomas James Daw","3. In the event that the works in relation to the Reed Bed System are carried out by the nominated undertaker:-\r\n3.1. the nominated undertaker will give to the Petitioners at least 12 months’ notice in writing of the intended date that the nominated undertaker intends to commence installation of the Reed Bed System (“the relevant date”), such notice to include an indicative timeframe for the completion of those works; and\r\n3.2. upon receipt from the Petitioners no later than six months in advance of the relevant date of at least three competitive quotes for the cost of the installation of the Reed Bed System, the nominated undertaker will seek to agree with the Petitioners –\r\n3.2.1. the specification of the Reed Bed System; and\r\n3.2.2. a maximum amount that the Petitioners will pay for the works, based on the specification agreed and the quotes obtained.\r\n4. In the event that agreement is reached under paragraph 3.2, the nominated undertaker shall proceed with the installation of the Reed Bed System subject to payment by the Petitioners to the nominated undertaker of the amount agreed under paragraph 3.2.2.\r\n5. In the event that no agreement is reached under paragraph 3.2 and the Petitioners do not elect to carry out the works themselves, the nominated undertaker shall carry out the works in connection with the installation of the Reed Bed System subject to payment by the Petitioner of the reasonable costs of the nominated undertaker so doing.\r\nIn this assurance:  \r\n“Reed Bed System” means a drainage system intended for the purposes of treating water runoff from potato washing;  \r\n","Works in relation to Reed Bed System\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Charles Meynell  (Fisher German), assurances 3 to 5","2020-07-09","Assurance","Woodhouse Farm, Pipe Lane, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C128.6","N/A","AP2/0013","Michael James Daw, Mavis Elizabeth Daw, Eleanor Rosemary Madeleine Daw and Samuel Thomas James Daw","6. As part of the engagement referred to in paragraph 1.2, the Parties will endeavour to agree maintenance responsibilities, fencing layout and access arrangements that will be associated with the proposed provision of the Sleeve, the Woodland Mitigation and Reed Bed System. \r\nIn this assurance:  \r\n“Reed Bed System” means a drainage system intended for the purposes of treating water runoff from potato washing;  \r\n“Sleeve” means a sleeve of appropriate material and size intended to contain a pipe, for the purposes of facilitating the installation and/or operation of the Reed Bed System, to be provided in the position marked for indicative purposes only on Plan A; \r\n“Woodland Mitigation” means the creation of woodland mitigation under the powers of the Bill at the Property, as labelled on Plan A.  \r\n","Maintenance responsibilities\r\n","Letter from Simon Knight  (HS2) to Charles Meynell  (Fisher German), assurance 6","2020-07-09","Assurance","Woodhouse Farm, Pipe Lane, Blithbury, Rugeley, Staffordshire, WS15 3JL","Lichfield District"]
["C129","Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance Inc","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C129.1","N/A","AP2/0017","Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance Inc","1.1        Subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2 first being satisfied, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to use reasonable endeavours during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme to reduce the physical extent of the proposed Wetland Habitat Mitigation by locating it on the land affected (shown indicatively in blue and purple on the attached Plan). \r\n 1.2        The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n 1.2.1     the provision of any such reduction in the extent of the proposed Wetland Habitat Mitigation would be fully in accordance with the existing powers of the Bill (as enacted);\r\n  1.2.2     the provision of any such reduction in the extent of the proposed Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land would not (in the opinion of the Secretary of State)  give rise to any new or different significant effects from those assessed and reported on in the Environmental Statement and would not cause a breach of the Environmental Minimum Requirements; and\r\n 1.2.3     the provision to reduce the extent of the proposed Wetland Habitat Mitigation is not likely to prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n 1.3\tIn designing the reduced Wetland Habitat Mitigation area the Nominated Undertaker shall engage with the Owner and consider so far as reasonably practicable arranging the reduced Wetland Habitat Mitigation area by moving the area shown coloured green to the position shown coloured purple on the attached Plan, provided that the total area designated for the reduced Wetland Habitat Mitigation area shall remain the same. \r\n1.4\tThe commitment in paragraph 1.3 is subject to the Nominated Undertaker being satisfied that the arrangement of the Wetland Habitat Mitigation area described in paragraph 1.3 above does not give rise to any new or different significant effects from those assessed and reported on in the Environmental Statement.\r\n1.5        Provided that:\r\n 1.5.1     the Owner or a procured Nominated Third Party enter into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n 1.5.1.1      provides that the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land must retain its ecological value in accordance with a monitoring and maintenance regime provided by the Secretary of State; and\r\n1.5.1.2      provides for the maintenance of the Wetland Habitat Mitigation to be provided on the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land; and\r\n1.5.2     the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Nominated Third Party is an appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the Wetland Habitat Mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of that mitigation on the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land; \r\n 1.5.3     there are no legal and/or other impediments to the Nominated Third Party entering into and thereafter complying with an agreement referred to in paragraph 1.5.1 above which may prejudice the construction and/or maintenance of the Wetland Habitat Mitigation;\r\n the Secretary of State shall enter into such appropriate arrangements to allow the Owner to graze the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land in accordance with the terms of the above agreement.\r\n1.6\tThe Secretary of State shall require the Nominated Undertaker so far as reasonably practicable to carry out and/or place any utility works in connection with the Proposed Scheme within Station Road leading from the A525 up to Haywood Crescent. \r\n1.7        The commitment in paragraph 1.6 is subject to the Nominated Undertaker being satisfied that the placing and/or carrying out the utility works within Station Road does not adversely impact on the construction programme of the Proposed Scheme and in all other respects does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n “Environmental Minimum Requirements” means as defined at Paragraph 4.4 of HS2 Phase 2A Information Paper E1: Control of Environmental Impacts (as amended from time to time);\r\n “Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and any subsequent and/or additional environmental statement deposited at Parliament with the Bill as amended;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“the Owner” means Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance Inc (HS2-AP2-017);\r\n “Nominated Third Party” means the tenant selected by the Owner;\r\n “Nominated Undertaker” refers to the body or bodies appointed by the Secretary of State to exercise the powers conferred by the Bill to construct and maintain the Proposed Scheme.  The nominated undertaker may be HS2 Ltd, or it may be another body or bodies appointed to oversee the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n“the Plan”’ is attached to this assurance;\r\n“Wetland Habitat Mitigation” means wetland habitat mitigation to be undertaken and maintained on the Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land pursuant to the Bill, as enacted;\r\n“the land affected” means the land, within the Owner’s land holding, directly impacted by the construction of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n “Wetland Habitat Mitigation Land” means the land shown in Yellow on the Plan attached to this assurance.\r\n\r\n","Wetland Habitat Mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Charles Meynell (Fisher German LLP)","2019-05-08","Assurance","The land shown in Yellow on the Plan attached to the assurance letter","Lichfield District"]
["C130","Rugeley Power Limited","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C130.1","N/A","HoC/0009 & AP1/0003","Rugeley Power Limited","1. The Promoter will promote for approval by Parliament:- \r\n1.1 an Additional Provision to facilitate an alternative power supply design for the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n1.2 the removal of the powers proposed to be conferred by the Bill over the land parcels listed in Paragraph 2 below, being the land parcels currently required to construct a power connection at the Site.\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n\"Additional Provision\" means amendments to the Bill introduced following deposit of the Bill into Parliament.\r\n","AP2 scheme","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Laura Fuller (Burges Salmon LLP), assurance 1","2019-04-17","Assurance","Parish of Brereton and Ravenhill and the Parish of Armitage with Handsacre","Stafford Borough"]
["C130.2","N/A","HoC/0009 & AP1/0003","Rugeley Power Limited","2. The land parcels referred to in Paragraph 1 above comprise:-2.1 The land parcels shown on sheet 1-17 of the Bill Parliamentary Plans as:-2.1.1 land parcels 9, 11 and 15 in Parish of Brereton and Ravenhill; and 2.1.2 land parcels 14, 23, 25 and 26 in Parish of Armitage and Handsacre.\r\n2.2 The land parcels shown on replacement sheet 1-18 of the Additional Provision 1 Parliamentary Plans as:- \r\n2.2.1 land parcels 3, 8, 10, 11, 13, AP1-1, AP1-2, AP1-3, AP1-4, AP1-5 and AP1-6 in the Parish of Brereton and Ravenhill; and\r\n2.2.2 land parcels 14, 15, 22, 24, AP1-1 and AP1-2 in the Parish of Armitage with Handsacre.\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n\"Additional Provision\" means amendments to the Bill introduced following deposit of the Bill into Parliament.\r\n\r\n","AP2 scheme","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Laura Fuller (Burges Salmon LLP), assurance 2","2019-04-17","Assurance","Parish of Brereton and Ravenhill and the Parish of Armitage with Handsacre","Stafford Borough"]
["C130.3","N/A","HoC/0009 & AP1/0003","Rugeley Power Limited","3.\tIn the event that:- \r\n3.1 the Additional Provision referred to in Paragraph 1.1 above is not approved by Parliament;\r\n3.2 the powers referred to in Paragraph 1.2 above are not removed from the Bill; and\r\n3.3 any of the land parcels referred to in Paragraph 2 above are required by the Promoter to construct a power connection at the Site, then, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to engage with Rugeley Power Limited for the purpose of seeking to identify such measures to accommodate Rugeley Power Limited’s proposals to re-develop the Site, as outlined in the Petitions, which could be reasonably incorporated by the nominated undertaker into the design or construction of the power connection at the Site without prejudicing the safe, timely and economic delivery and operation of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n\"Additional Provision\" means amendments to the Bill introduced following deposit of the Bill into Parliament.\r\n\r\n","AP2 scheme","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Laura Fuller  (Burges Salmon LLP), assurance 3","2019-04-17","Assurance","Parish of Brereton and Ravenhill and the Parish of Armitage with Handsacre","Stafford Borough"]
["C130.4","N/A","HoC/0009 & AP1/0003","Rugeley Power Limited","4.  Where any measures are identified pursuant to Paragraph 3 above the nominated undertaker will seek to implement such measures as part of the nominated undertaker’s construction of the power connection at the Site subject to:- \r\n4.1 the nominated undertaker using reasonable endeavours to secure from the relevant consenting authority any necessary consents required to implement the identified measures; and\r\n 4.2 Rugeley Power Limited granting the nominated undertaker such consents or permissions as may be required from Rugeley Power Limited to enable the nominated undertaker to implement the identified measures, with such consents or permissions not to be unreasonably delayed or granted subject to any conditions unacceptable to the Promoter.\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n“nominated undertaker” refers to the body or bodies appointed by the Secretary of State to exercise the powers conferred by the Bill to construct and maintain the Proposed Scheme. The nominated undertaker may be HS2 Ltd, or it may be another body or bodies appointed to oversee the construction and operation of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n“the Site” means the former Rugeley Power Station, Staffordshire.\r\n","AP2 scheme","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Laura Fuller, (Burges Salmon LLP), assurance 4","2019-04-17","Assurance","Parish of Brereton and Ravenhill and the Parish of Armitage with Handsacre","Stafford Borough"]
["C130.5","N/A","HoC/0009 & AP1/0003","Rugeley Power Limited","5.  In the event AP2 is approved by Parliament, then the Promoter will amend the Safeguarding Directions following Royal Assent of the Bill to remove the land parcels referred to in Paragraph 2 above from the relevant zone referred to in paragraph 3 of the Safeguarding Directions and as shown by lines marked “Limits of Land subject to the Safeguarding Direction” on the plans annexed to the Safeguarding Directions.\r\n","AP2 scheme","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Laura Fuller (Burges Salmon LLP), assurance 5","2019-04-17","Assurance","Parish of Brereton and Ravenhill and the Parish of Armitage with Handsacre","Stafford Borough"]
["C130.6","N/A","HoC/0009 & AP1/0003","Rugeley Power Limited","6. For the avoidance of doubt the Promoter acknowledges that Rugeley Power Limited continues to have a right to appear before the House of Commons Select Committee in respect of the Petitions.\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n“the Petitions” means the petitions submitted by Rugeley Power Limited in the House of Commons against the Bill (petition reference - HS2-P2A-009-1) and against Additional Provision 1 (petition reference – HS2-AP1-003-1).","AP2 scheme","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Laura Fuller (Burges Salmon LLP), assurance 6","2019-04-17","Assurance","Parish of Brereton and Ravenhill and the Parish of Armitage with Handsacre","Stafford Borough"]
["C131","Hough, Thomas","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C131.1","N/A","AP2/0006","Thomas Hough","1.1\tDuring the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2, to use reasonable endeavours to reconfigure the location of the Ecological Mitigation at the Property by relocating the Ecological Mitigation at the Orange Land to the Blue Land for the purposes of the Petitioner’s efficient management of agricultural operations at the Property.\r\n1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n1.2.1\tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the relocation of the Ecological Mitigation can be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement;\r\n1.2.2\tthe Ecological Mitigation does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.3\tthe nominated undertaker obtains any required  consents and approvals from the local planning authority for the use of the Blue Land for Ecological Mitigation, provided that such consents can be reasonably implemented, and any approval required under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 of the Bill is received; \r\n1.2.4\tthe Blue Land being sufficient to accommodate the Ecological Mitigation intended for the Orange Land [plan attached to beneficiary letter]; \r\n1.2.5\tthe Petitioner, being the freehold owner and occupier of the Blue Land [plan attached to beneficiary letter] entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n1.2.5.1\tgrants all and any necessary rights over the Blue Land [plan attached to beneficiary letter] sufficient to enable the Secretary of State to use that land for Ecological Mitigation including, for the avoidance of doubt, any access required for the establishment, maintenance and inspection of the Ecological Mitigation;\r\n1.2.5.2\tprovides for the construction and maintenance of the Ecological Mitigation to be provided on the Blue Land [plan attached to beneficiary letter], subject to a management and maintenance agreement being entered into between the Petitioner and the Secretary of State; and\r\n1.2.5.3\tprovides that the consideration payable to the Petitioner for using the Blue Land [plan attached to beneficiary letter] for Ecological Mitigation shall be calculated as if the Secretary of State had done so in the exercise of the powers of the Bill. \r\n1.2.6\tthe Blue Land [plan attached to beneficiary letter] not being subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the construction, maintenance or the objectives of the Ecological Mitigation to be provided.\r\n1.3\tNothing in this assurance shall prevent the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred by the Bill over the Orange Land to the extent that the Blue Land is insufficient to accommodate the Ecological Mitigation. \r\n1.4\tCompensation for land acquired by the Secretary of State shall be calculated in accordance with the Compensation Code.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n “the Blue Land” means the land coloured blue on the Plan [plan attached to beneficiary letter] being land within the Petitioner’s ownership which has been identified as suitable to be used for the Ecological Mitigation; \r\n“the Compensation Code” means the code of statute and case law determining the compensation to be paid to landowners and occupiers where land or rights in land are authorised to be compulsorily acquired under the Bill;\r\n“the Ecological Mitigation” means the proposed creation of ecological mitigation at the Property; \r\n“the Orange Land” means the land coloured orange on the Plan [plan attached to beneficiary letter], being within the Petitioner’s land ownership, which has been identified within Additional Provision 2 to the Bill for the purposes of Ecological Mitigation;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Mr Thomas Hough who is the freehold owner and occupier of the Property;\r\n“the Property” means the Petitioner’s land ownership including land adjoining Chantry Farm Thorny Lanes, Hoar Cross, Burton-on-Trent;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Ecological Mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Co)","2019-04-17","Assurance","Wilderley Barn, Lea Lane, Admaston, Rugeley, Staffordshire. WS15 3NN \r\n\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C132","Hopley, Robert and Joseph","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C132.1","N/A","AP2/0008","Robert and Joseph Hopley","1.1\tDuring detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State shall require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to carry out the \"Access Works\" illustrated on the Plan [plan attached to beneficiary letter] for the purposes of maintaining the Petitioner’s access to its agricultural land holdings at the Property subject to the conditions in paragraph 1.2. \r\n1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 above are:\r\n1.2.1\tthe Bill confers all necessary powers and consents required in order to deliver the \"Access Works\";\r\n1.2.2\tthe \"Access Works\" do not create any new or different environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement with the Bill;\r\n1.2.3\tthe \"Access Works\" do not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.4\tthe nominated undertaker obtaining the necessary approvals under Schedule 4 of the Bill for \"Access Works\" to construct Access 1; and\r\n1.2.5\tthe nominated undertaker obtaining all necessary approvals:\r\n(i)\tunder paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 of the Bill in connection with any revision of the Woodland Mitigation area which may be required as a result of the construction of Access 2; and/or \r\n(ii)\tfrom the relevant drainage authority (if appropriate) to construct Access 2.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n\"Access 1\" - means the following works:\r\n1) a new shared enlarged gated access;\r\n2) a new shared access track 3.5m track, 0.5m verges, with a gate at the end of the track and a gate into the adjoining field; and \r\n3) fencing and hedgerow either side of the access track to mitigate any loss of existing hedgerow\r\nfor the purposes of providing access and egress from the Property to/from Bromley Road (B5234) to be constructed in the approximate location numbered 1 on the Plan suitable for use by farm vehicles and machinery and at a suitable gradient in accordance with HS2 Ltd’s standards, as a construction access to the construction compound for Parkgate sub-station and access to Parkgate sub-station following completion of construction.\r\n\"Access 2\" - means a new access to be constructed on either side of Purbrook crossing and in land identified for Woodland Mitigation in the approximate location numbered 2 on the Plan [the plan attached to beneficiary letter] to be determined by the nominated undertaker for the purposes of the Petitioner’s access to its agricultural land holding\r\n\"Access Works\" - means the works to construct the Access 1 and Access 2 for the purpose of reconfiguring the Petitioner’s existing access to the Property as a result of AP2 \r\n\"Bill\" means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n\"Environmental Statement\" means the environmental statement including any supplementary environmental statement deposited into Parliament with the Bill and AP2  farm vehicles and machinery means such vehicles and machinery as are reasonably required for the purpose of farming the Property;\r\n\"the Petitioner\" means Mr Robert and Mr Joseph Hopley and family;\r\n\"the Property\" means Daisy Bank Farm shown edged red on the Plan;\r\n\"Plan\" means the attached plan illustrating the \"Access Works\" proposed at the Property and the Woodland Mitigation proposed at the Property;\r\n\"Proposed Scheme\" means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n\"Woodland Mitigation\" means the proposed creation of ecological mitigation area currently designated on the Property shown on the Plan.\r\n","Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert and Joseph Hopley","2019-04-17","Assurance","Daisy Bank Farm, Thorney Lanes, Newborough, Staffordshire. DE13 8RY\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C132.2","N/A","AP2/0008","Robert and Joseph Hopley","1.1\tDuring the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to conditions in paragraph 1.2, to use reasonable endeavours to reconfigure the location of the Woodland Mitigation at the Property by relocating some of the Woodland Mitigation at the Pink Land to the Orange Land for the purposes of the Petitioner’s efficient management of agricultural operations at the Property.\r\n1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n1.2.1\tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the relocation of the  Woodland Mitigation can be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement;\r\n1.2.2\tthe Woodland Mitigation does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.3\tthe nominated undertaker obtains any required  consents and approvals from the local planning authority for the use of the Orange Land for Woodland Mitigation, provided that such consents can be reasonably implemented, and any approval required under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 of the Bill is received; \r\n1.2.4\tthe Petitioner, being the freehold owner and occupier of the Orange Land entering into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which:\r\n1.2.4.1\tgrants all and any necessary rights over the Orange Land sufficient to enable the Secretary of State to use that land for Woodland Mitigation including, for the avoidance of doubt, any access required for the establishment, maintenance and inspection of the Woodland Mitigation;\r\n1.2.4.2\tprovides for the construction and maintenance of the Woodland Mitigation to be provided on the Orange Land, subject to a management and maintenance agreement being entered into between the Petitioner and the Secretary of State; and\r\n1.2.4.3\tprovides that the consideration payable to the Petitioner for using the Orange Land for Woodland Mitigation shall be calculated as if the Secretary of State had done so in the exercise of the powers of the Bill;\r\n1.2.5\tthe Orange Land not being subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the construction, maintenance or the objectives of the Woodland Mitigation to be provided.\r\n1.3\tNothing in this assurance shall prevent the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred by the Bill over the Pink Land to the extent that the Orange Land is insufficient to accommodate the Woodland Mitigation. \r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Pink Land” means the land coloured Pink on the Plan being land within the Petitioner’s ownership which has been identified within Additional Provision 2 for  Woodland Mitigation; \r\n“the Environmental Statement”  means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“the Orange Land” means the land coloured orange on the Plan being land within the Petitioner’s ownership which the Petitioner has requested be used  for the relocation of  Woodland Mitigation;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Mr Robert and Mr Joseph Hopley and family  who are the freeholder owners and occupiers of the Property;\r\n“the Property” means the Petitioner’s land ownership including Daisy Bank Farm shown edged red on the Plan; \r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; \r\n“Woodland Mitigation” means the proposed creation of ecological mitigation area currently designated on the Property shown on the Plan.\r\n","Woodland Mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert and Joseph Hopley, assurance 1","2019-04-23","Assurance","Daisy Bank Farm, Thorney Lanes, Newborough, Staffordshire. DE13 8RY\r\n\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C132.3","N/A","AP2/0008","Robert and Joseph Hopley","2.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the detailed design of the Woodland Mitigation.\r\n2.2. The nominated undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 2.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works authorised by the Bill:\r\n2.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of agricultural land; and\r\n2.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the detailed design of the Woodland Mitigation for the purpose of facilitating the efficient management of the Property for agricultural purposes following the completion of the construction of those works authorised by the Bill.\r\n2.3. The relevant factors referred to in paragraph 2.2 are that:\r\n2.3.1 the Woodland Mitigation can be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement; \r\n2.3.2 the Woodland Mitigation does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n2.3.3 the nominated undertaker obtains any required consents and approvals from the local planning authority for reasonable modifications to the detailed design of the Woodland Mitigation provided that such consents can be reasonably implemented; \r\n2.3.4 any approval by the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill required being secured;\r\n2.3.5 the Woodland Mitigation maintains connectivity to the existing woodland at the Property; and\r\n2.3.6 the Woodland Mitigation complies with other relevant undertakings and assurances.\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Pink Land” means the land coloured Pink on the Plan being land within the Petitioner’s ownership which has been identified within Additional Provision 2 for  Woodland Mitigation; \r\n“the Environmental Statement”  means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Mr Robert and Mr Joseph Hopley and family  who are the freeholder owners and occupiers of the Property;\r\n“the Property” means the Petitioner’s land ownership including Daisy Bank Farm shown edged red on the Plan; \r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; \r\n“Woodland Mitigation” means the proposed creation of ecological mitigation area currently designated on the Property shown on the Plan.\r\n","Detailed Design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Robert and Joseph Hopley, assurance 2","2019-04-23","Assurance","Daisy Bank Farm, Thorney Lanes, Newborough, Staffordshire. DE13 8RY\r\n\r\n","East Staffordshire"]
["C133","Options Autism 4 Limited","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C133.1","N/A","AP2/0036","Options Autism 4 Limited"," 1.1\tSubject to the exceptions set out in paragraph 1.2, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker not to prevent vehicular access to the Company’s Land across the Green Land during the temporary occupation and use of the Green Land for the execution of the power supply works. \r\n1.2\tThe exceptions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are where access is required to be temporarily suspended by reasons of operational safety or an operational emergency. \r\n1.3\tIn the execution of the power supply works the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Company on the overall phasing of the works and the approximate timings of when access across the Green Land is likely to be impeded by the execution of the power supply works.” \r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Company” means Options Autism (4) Limited;\r\n“Company’s Land” means the land within the Company’s ownership as shown edged in red on the attached plan;\r\n“Green Land” means the land within the Company’s  ownership which is shown shaded in green on the attached plan and which is shown marked AP2-104 on  the deposited plans for the Additional Provision in the County of Staffordshire, District of Lichfield ;\r\n“power supply works” means works being carried out by or on behalf of the nominated undertaker in the vicinity of the Company’s Land to divert overhead electricity cables which are required to be carried out in connection with the Proposed Scheme\r\n\r\n“nominated undertaker” means the nominated undertaker exercising powers or functions under the Bill once enacted by virtue of an order made under clause 41 of the Bill; and\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.","Proposed Scheme","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Anne Milne (DMH Stallard LLP)","2019-04-18","Assurance","Alrewas Road, Kings Bromley, Burton on Trent, DE13 7HR","Lichfield District"]
["C134","Hill, Henry","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C134.1","N/A","AP2/0035","Henry J Hill","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the detailed design of the Wetland Habitat with the aim of removing or reducing the extent of the Wetland Habitat.\r\n1.2. The nominated undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation undertaken under paragraph 1.1 and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors, including other relevant Undertakings and Assurances, associated with the design, construction, maintenance and operation of those works will:\r\n1.2.1 seek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2 seek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the detailed design of the Wetland Habitat for the purpose of facilitating the efficient management of the Property for agricultural purposes following the completion of the construction of those works.\r\n1.3. Nothing in this paragraph 1 shall require any modification to the Wetland Habitat which:\r\n1.3.1  gives rise to any new or different significant effect on the environment which has not been addressed in the Environmental Statement but that does not preclude consideration being given to any proposals for such modifications; and/or\r\n1.3.2 prejudices the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.4. Any modification to the Wetland Habitat pursuant to this paragraph 1 is subject to the nominated undertaker obtaining any required consents and approvals from the local planning authority for reasonable modifications to the detailed design of the Wetland Habitat provided that such consents can be reasonably implemented, and subject to any approval required under Schedule 17 of the Bill. \r\nIn these assurances:\r\n “the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n “the Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Henry Hill of Ashbrook Farm, Bromley Hurst, Abbots Bromley, Staffordshire, WS15 3AX;\r\n“the Property” means Ashbrook Farm;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; \r\n“the Wetland Habitat” means the proposed habitat creation on the Petitioner’s Property as illustrated by the land coloured red on plan CT-06-207-R3 [the plan attached to beneficiary letter]","Detailed Design","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Henry Hill, assurance 1","2019-04-18","Assurance","Ashbrook Farm, Bromley Hurst, Abbots Bromley, Staffordshire, WS15 3AX","Stafford Borough"]
["C134.2","N/A","AP2/0035","Henry J Hill","2.1 The Secretary of State acknowledges that the Petitioner is currently able to drive across that part of its Property on which the Wetland Habitat is proposed so as to gain access to other parts of the Property. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to preserve a suitable form of vehicular access from the Property over the Ash Brook and through the proposed Wetland Habitat so as to gain access to other parts of the Petitioner’s Property and that access will be no less commodious for the Petitioner’s agricultural purposes than the access that is currently enjoyed.\r\n2.2 The preservation of access from the Property over the Ash Brook and through the proposed Wetland Habitat as described in paragraph 2.1 is subject to the nominated undertaker using reasonable endeavours to obtain any necessary consents and permissions, including any that may be required under Schedule 17 to the Bill.\r\n2.3 For the avoidance of doubt, in the event that there is likely to be an interruption to the Petitioner’s access across their land during the construction of Wetland Habitat the nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to inform the Petitioners prior to this interruption.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“the Petitioner” means Henry Hill of Ashbrook Farm, Bromley Hurst, Abbots Bromley, Staffordshire, WS15 3AX;\r\n“the Property” means Ashbrook Farm;\r\n“the Wetland Habitat” means the proposed habitat creation on the Petitioner’s Property as illustrated by the land coloured red on plan CT-06-207-R3 [the plan attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n","Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Henry Hill, assurance 2","2019-04-18","Assurance","Ashbrook Farm, Bromley Hurst, Abbots Bromley, Staffordshire, WS15 3AX","Stafford Borough"]
["C135","Walton Homes Limited","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C135.1","N/A","AP2/0012","Walton Homes Limited"," 1.\tSubject to the conditions in paragraph 2 and the successful promotion of Additional Provision 2, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to construct the Maintenance Compound in a position that is further to the south east than is currently proposed to seek to accommodate a noise bund required by the Planning Permission.\r\n2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that the Secretary of State must be satisfied that the relocation of the Maintenance Compound:\r\n(i)\twill not result in new or different environmental effects from those reported in the Environmental Statement;\r\n(ii)\twill not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme; \r\n(iii)\tdoes not require the use of land that is outside of Act Limits (as defined in the Bill);\r\n(iv)\tall necessary consents being obtained, including any approval of the relevant local planning authority under schedule 17 to the Bill,\r\nand that the nominated undertaker (s) and/or Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (or any successor) will have a sufficient form of permanent access to the maintenance compound in its new position during the operation of the scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited at Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“Maintenance Compound” means the proposed compound as shown indicatively outlined in pink on the attached plan;\r\n“Petitioner” means Walton Homes Limited of Charter House, Sandford Street, Lichfield, Staffordshire WS13 6QA whose petition has been given the reference ‘HS2-AP2-012’;\r\n“the attached plan” means the plan attached to this assurance;\r\n“Planning Permission” means the permission granted by Lichfield District Council to the Petitioner on 9 June 2016 with reference 15/01198/OUTM; \r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n\r\n\"Additional Provision\" means amendments to the Bill introduced following deposit of the Bill into Parliament.\r\n\r\n","Maintenance Compound\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Malcolm Gale, (Bagshaws), assurance 1","2019-04-25","Assurance","Walton Homes Limited of Charter House, Sandford Street, Lichfield, Staffordshire WS13 6QA","Lichfield District"]
["C136","Lichfield District Council","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C136.1","N/A","AP2/0069","Lichfield District Council","1. The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to engage regularly with Lichfield District Council in developing the implementation of Option 7.”\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“Option 7” means the proposal being considered by the nominated undertaker for an alternative solution to seek to address issues at Common Lane as a result of the Proposed Scheme involving the construction of a new permanent road linking the A515 Lichfield Road to Crawley Lane on the alignment shown indicatively on Plan 1;\r\n“Plan 1” means the plan attached to this agreement.\r\n","Implementation of Option 7","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Alastair Lewis, (Sharpe Pritchard LLP)\r\n\r\n","2019-04-29","Assurance","The A515 Lichfield Road to Crawley Lane \r\n","Lichfield District"]
["C137","Walker, Ian and Fay","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C137.1","N/A","AP2/0002","Mr Ian and Mrs Fay Walker, Rowe Farm","1.1\tThe nominated undertaker will, during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, review the use of the Local Placement and following such review will consider whether it is reasonably practicable to reduce the size of the Local Placement proposed to be located on the area shown indicatively on the Plan  or avoid using the site for the Local Placement entirely.\r\n1.2\tThe nominated undertaker will, during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, seek to engage with the Petitioner and will inform them of the outcome of the review of the Local Placement as described in paragraph 1.1. \r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“the Local Placement” refers to the proposed local placement SES2-003-006 (H5 – J5 and H6 – I6) illustrated edged blue on the Plan;[attached to the beneficiary letter]\r\n “the Petitioner” means Ian and Fay Walker of Rowe Farm, The Rowe, Stableford, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 4EN;\r\n“the Plan” means the attached plan illustrating the current proposed location of the Local Placement and Replacement Land; \r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; \r\n “the Replacement Land” means the two areas of land identified by the nominated undertaker as being suitable to relocate the Local Placement as illustrated on the Plan; \r\nThese assurances are subject to the successful promotion of AP2 in Parliament by the Secretary of State and takes effect on confirmation of AP2 by Parliament.\r\n","Review of Local Placement","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Roger Bedson, (Hinson Parry & Company),  assurance 1","2019-04-29","Assurance","The Rowe, Stableford, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 4EN\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C137.2","N/A","AP2/0002","Mr Ian and Mrs Fay Walker, Rowe Farm","2.1\tIf the nominated undertaker confirms that the Local Placement to be retained as illustrated on the Plan,[attached to the beneficiary letter] then the Petitioner will be provided with details of the schedule and duration of the associated HS2 Works. The nominated undertaker will continue to engage with Petitioner throughout the duration of HS2 Works and will fulfil its existing commitment to put in place an agricultural liaison service.\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“HS2 Works” means the works authorised to be constructed under the Bill;\r\n“the Local Placement” refers to the proposed local placement SES2-003-006 (H5 – J5 and H6 – I6) illustrated edged blue on the Plan;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Ian and Fay Walker of Rowe Farm, The Rowe, Stableford, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 4EN.\r\n","Provision of information on HS2 Works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Roger Bedson, (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 2","2019-04-29","Assurance","The Rowe, Stableford, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 4EN","Stafford Borough"]
["C137.3","N/A","AP2/0002","Mr Ian and Mrs Fay Walker, Rowe Farm","3.1\tDuring the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in 3.2 to use reasonable endeavours to reduce, so far as reasonably practicable, the  Local Placement by re-locating it onto one of the two areas identified for Replacement Land.\r\n3.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 3.1 are that:\r\n3.2.1\tthe nominated undertaker concludes that any change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without adverse impact on the construction programme of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n3.2.2\tthe nominated undertaker concludes that any change to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without prejudicing the safety, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n3.2.3\tthe Petitioner has entered into an agreement with the nominated undertaker, the landowner and any other occupier of the land for the proposed reconfiguration of Local Placement on terms satisfactory to the nominated undertaker to make provision for the relocation of Local Placement onto the Replacement Land;\r\n3.2.4\tthe nominated undertaker securing all necessary and reasonably implementable planning consents and any other approvals for the purposes of use as Replacement Land; and \r\n3.2.5\tthe Replacement Land is at the disposal of the Secretary of State for the purposes of relocating the Local Placement.\r\n3.3\tFor the avoidance of doubt, should the Replacement Land not receive the required approvals and consents as set out in paragraph 3.2, the Local Placement will be retained as currently designed in AP2 and illustrated on the Plan.\"\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“the Local Placement” refers to the proposed local placement SES2-003-006 (H5 – J5 and H6 – I6) illustrated edged blue on the Plan;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Ian and Fay Walker of Rowe Farm, The Rowe, Stableford, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 4EN;\r\n“the Plan” means the attached plan illustrating the current proposed location of the Local Placement and Replacement Land; \r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; \r\n “the Replacement Land” means the two areas of land identified by the nominated undertaker as being suitable to relocate the Local Placement as illustrated on the Plan; \r\n\"Additional Provision\" means amendments to the Bill introduced following deposit of the Bill into Parliament;\r\n\"AP2\" means High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill Additional Provision which has been deposited in Parliament on 8 February 2019.\r\n","Use of alternative sites for Local Placement","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Roger Bedson, (Hinson Parry & Company), assurance 3","2019-04-29","Assurance","The Rowe, Stableford, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 4EN\r\n\r\n\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C138","Bloor, Mr R J and Mrs M A","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C138.1","N/A","AP2/0051","Mr and Mrs Bloor","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker in exercising the powers under the Bill not to, as far as is reasonably practicable, prevent vehicular and pedestrian access to and from the Property during the operation of the Tittensor Road Utility Compound, the Swynnerton Embankment Satellite Compound and the associated Rail Systems compound.\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Petitioner” means Mr R J and Mrs M A Bloor who are the freehold owner-occupiers of the Property;\r\n“the Property” means the Petitioner’s landholding including Glebe House, Tittensor Road, Swynnerton, Stone, ST15 0QD.\r\n","Maintaining Access\r\n\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs Bloor, assurance 1","2019-04-26","Assurance","Glebe House, Tittensor Road, Swynnerton, Stone, ST15 0QD;\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C138.2","N/A","AP2/0051","Mr and Mrs Bloor","1.\tOther than in the case of emergency or being directed to do so by the Local Highway Authority, the Promoter will during detailed design require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to reduce the use of Large Goods Vehicles on Tittensor Road and Tittensor Road diversion during the construction of AP2 by relocating the main access to the Tittensor Road Utility Compound, the Swynnerton Embankment Satellite Compound and the associated Rail Systems compound away from the Property, subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 2 below.\r\n2.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are that:\r\na.\tthe changes do not give rise to any new or different significant environmental impacts other than those assessed in the Environmental Statement;\r\nb.\tthe Promoter concludes that any changes to the Proposed Scheme design can be made without adverse impact on the construction programme of the Proposed Scheme;\r\nc.\tthe Bill confers all necessary powers and consents required in order to deliver the relocation of the main access;\r\nd.\tthe Promoter obtaining any necessary permissions, consents and approvals from the Local Planning Authority and the Local Highway Authority required to implement the relocation of the main access to the Swynnerton Embankment Satellite Compound;\r\ne.\tthe changes do not impact the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“Large Goods Vehicles” has the same meaning as defined in paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n “the Petitioner” means Mr R J and Mrs M A Bloor who are the freehold owner-occupiers of the Property;\r\n“the Property” means the Petitioner’s landholding including Glebe House, Tittensor Road, Swynnerton, Stone, ST15 0QD;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Moving main access to Swynnerton Embankment Satellite Compound \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs Bloor, assurances 1 to 2","2019-04-26","Assurance","Glebe House, Tittensor Road, Swynnerton, Stone, ST15 0QD;\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C138.3","N/A","AP2/0051","Mr and Mrs Bloor","The Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner in relation to any hoarding to be erected at the Swynnerton Embankment Satellite Compound facing the Property and will allow the Petitioner reasonable opportunity to comment on the emerging design before it is finalised. In designing any enhanced hoarding facing the Property to be erected at the Swynnerton Satellite Compound the Promoter will take into account the setting and the need for the hoarding to be sympathetic to the Property.”\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n“the Petitioner” means Mr R J and Mrs M A Bloor who are the freehold owner-occupiers of the Property;\r\n“the Property” means the Petitioner’s landholding including Glebe House, Tittensor Road, Swynnerton, Stone, ST15 0QD.\r\n\r\n","Hoarding\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr and Mrs Bloor, assurance 3","2019-04-26","Assurance","Glebe House, Tittensor Road, Swynnerton, Stone, ST15 0QD;\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C138.4","N/A","AP2/0051","Mr and Mrs Bloor","22. HS2 Ltd will engage with Mr and Mrs Bloor to establish whether they still wish to sell their property and, if they do, will make an offer to acquire them under the terms of the Need to Sell scheme.","Need to sell scheme\r\n","Promoter's response to the Select Committee's Third Special Report of Session 2017-2019, paragraph 22","2019-06-24","Assurance","Glebe House, Tittensor Road, Swynnerton, Stone, ST15 0QD;\r\n","Stafford Borough"]
["C139","Bowers, David, Julian and Robert","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C139.1","N/A","AP2/0015","David, Julian and Robert Bowers","This assurance is subject to the successful promotion of AP2 in Parliament by the Secretary of State.\r\n1.\tIn undertaking detailed design of the HS2 Works to be constructed which affect the junction of the A34 (Stafford Road) and A51 (Stone Bypass) at Stone, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Petitioner in relation to:- \r\n1.1\tthe impact of the construction of the HS2 Works on the existing field access; and \r\n1.2\tpotential proposals for new vehicular accesses proposed to be located along the Petitioner’s existing boundary fronting the A34 (Stafford Road) and the A51 (Stone Bypass) as part of a development proposal for the Property brought forward by the Petitioner, and will allow the Petitioner reasonable opportunity to comment on the emerging design of the HS2 Works before they are finalised.\r\n2.\tThe Promoter will, during the construction of the HS2 Works, require the nominated undertaker in exercising the powers under the Bill not to, as far as is reasonably practicable, prevent vehicular access to and from the Property over the existing field access.\r\n3.\tThe Promoter will compensate the Petitioner in accordance with the Compensation Code as applied by the Bill for the compulsory purchase of land required for the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn these assurances:-\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Compensation Code” means the code of statute and case law determining the compensation to be paid to landowners and occupiers where land or rights in land are authorised to be compulsorily acquired under the Bill;\r\n“the existing field access” means the field access located on the Plan;\r\n“HS2 Works” means modifications to the junction of the A34 (Stafford Road) and the A51 (Stone Bypass junction) at Stone; \r\n“the Petitioner” means David Bowers, Julian Bowers and Robert Bowers;\r\n“the Plan” means the attached plan No. CT-06-220-R2;\r\n “the Property” means the Petitioner’s landholding as illustrated on the Plan edged pink;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; and\r\n\"Additional Provision\" means amendments to the Bill introduced following deposit of the Bill into Parliament;\r\n\"AP2\" means the Additional Provision as deposited in Parliament on 8 February 2019.\r\n","Design of the HS2 Works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Messrs Bowers, assurances 1 to 3","2019-04-26","Assurance","The junction of the A34 (Stafford Road) and the A51 (Stone Bypass junction) at Stone","Stafford Borough"]
["C140","The Whitmore Estate, Trustees of Whitmore Maintenance Fund, Trustees of Whitmore Estate, G & C Cavenagh-Mainwaring, Edward R Cavenagh -Mainwaring, Christine Cavenagh-Mainwaring","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C140.1","N/A","AP2/0005","The Whitmore Estate, Trustees of Whitmore Maintenance Fund, Trustees of Whitmore Estate, G & C Cavenagh-Mainwaring, Edward R Cavenagh -Mainwaring, Christine Cavenagh-Mainwaring","1.1 Following the construction of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to provide the Access indicatively illustrated on Plan 1 for the purposes of maintaining the Petitioner’s access to its agricultural land holdings subject to conditions in paragraph 1.2.\r\n 1.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that:\r\n1.2.1 the Bill confers all necessary powers and consents required in order to deliver the proposed Access;\r\n1.2.2 the proposed Access does not create any new or different significant environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement with the Bill;\r\n1.2.3 the proposed Access does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery, operation and maintenance of the Proposed Scheme; and\r\n1.2.4 the proposed Access receives any required approval from the local planning and highway authorities under the Bill.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Access” means the proposed access south of the A53 Newcastle Road and over the southern portal of the Whitmore Heath Tunnel indicatively shown edged black on the Plan;\r\n \"AP2\" means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill Additional Provision which has been deposited in the House of Commons on 8 February 2019;\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 and amended by AP2;\r\n “the Environmental Statement”  means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme and deposited in Parliament with the Bill;\r\n“Plan 1” means the attached plan indicatively illustrating the route of the proposed Access;  [plan attached to beneficiary letter]\r\n “the Petitioner” means The Whitmore Estate, Trustees of the Whitmore Maintenance Fund, Trustees of Whitmore Estate, G & C Cavenagh- Mainwaring, Edward R Cavenagh- Mainwaring and Christine Cavenagh- Mainwaring;\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Access over the Whitmore Heath Tunnel Southern Portal","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Poole, (The Whitmore Estate), assurance 1","2019-04-26","Assurance","The Whitmore Estate","Stafford Borough"]
["C140.2","N/A","AP2/0005","The Whitmore Estate, Trustees of Whitmore Maintenance Fund, Trustees of Whitmore Estate, G & C Cavenagh-Mainwaring, Edward R Cavenagh -Mainwaring, Christine Cavenagh-Mainwaring","2.1 The Promoter shall require the nominated undertaker to consult with the Petitioners during the detailed design of the Accommodation Underbridge and consider so far as reasonably practicable the reasonable requirements of the Petitioners when determining the specifications of the Accommodation Underbridge, subject to the conditions referred to in paragraph 2.2 and 2.3. \r\n2.2 In respect of the Accommodation Underbridge: \r\n2.2.1 the reasonable requirements referred to in paragraph 2.1 means that the Accommodation Underbridge will be sized in accordance with the expected usage requirements of the Petitioners and other authorised users; \r\n2.2.2 The dimensions of the Accommodation Underbridge will be at least 4.7 metres wide by 4.14 metres high where the Petitioners’ usage requirements include traversing the crossing by large agricultural vehicles, machinery and implements. \r\n2.3 In considering the Petitioners’ requirements the Promoter shall be satisfied that the requirements: \r\n2.3.1 do not interfere with reasonable usage of the Accommodation Underbridge by other authorised users; \r\n2.3.2 do not result in any new or different significant environmental effects other than those reported in the Environmental Statement; \r\n2.3.3 do not adversely impact on the construction programme of HS2 accommodation works or the Proposed Scheme; \r\n2.3.4 are within the limits and powers of the Bill, excepting the specification of any other accommodation crossing which may be the subject of a separate agreement between the Petitioners and the Promoter which allows for the relocation of the accommodation crossing for which consents and permissions additional to those provided for in the Bill will be required; \r\n2.3.5 do not in all other respects affect the safe, economic and timely delivery of the Proposed Scheme.”\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Accommodation Underbridge” means an accommodation bridge to be constructed under the Bill and referred to as Work 92C of the Authorised Works in Schedule 1 of the Bill; \r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined in the Bill. ","Crossing Specifications for the Whitmore Wood Accommodation Underbridge\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr Poole, (The Whitmore Estate), assurance 2","2019-04-26","Assurance","The Whitmore Estate","Stafford Borough"]
["C141","Boulton, Richard Peter","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C141.1","N/A","AP2/0068","Richard Peter Boulton","1.1 Prior to the completion of the detailed design of the works authorised by the Bill that are proposed to be constructed on or operated from any part of the Property for the purposes of the operation of the Borrow Pit, the Secretary of State will require the Nominated Undertaker to consult the Petitioner regarding the Nominated Undertaker’s preparation of the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology.\r\n1.2  The Nominated Undertaker shall have regard to the responses received to the consultation under paragraph 1.1 above and in so far as reasonably practicable, after taking into account all other relevant factors including but not limited to the relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.4 below associated with the design, construction, operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit,\r\n1.2.1\tseek to minimise the loss of Grade 1, 2 and 3a agricultural land as described in the Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales, published by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in October 1988; and\r\n1.2.2\tseek to accommodate reasonable proposals from the Petitioner to modify the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology for the purposes of facilitating the efficient management of the Petitioner’s agricultural holding operated by the Petitioner on or from the Property during the period of the excavation of the Borrow Pit by the Nominated Undertaker.\r\n1.3\tNothing in this assurance shall require any modification to the Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology which gives rise to any significant impact on the environment which has not been addressed in the environmental statement for the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.4\tThe relevant factors referred to in paragraph 1.2 above are:-\r\n1.4.1\tany requirements of the local planning authority for the approval of the operation and restoration of the Borrow Pit under Schedule 17 of the Bill;\r\n1.4.2\tthe safe, timely and economic operation of the Borrow Pit;\r\n1.4.3\tcompliance with other relevant undertakings and assurances; and \r\n1.4.4\tthe safe, timely and economic delivery of any other works for the Proposed Scheme connected with, or within the vicinity of, the Borrow Pit.”\r\nIn this assurance:-\r\n“Bill”\tmeans the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Borrow Pit”\tmeans the borrow pit identified on Plan 1 as Borrow Pit 1 (189) and located within plot 66 in the Parish of Kings Bromley as shown on the deposited plan as deposited with the Bill;\r\n“Borrow Pit Extraction Methodology”\tmeans the methodology for the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which shall include the following:-\r\na)\tInformation on the method or methods for the extraction of materials from any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property;\r\nb)\tInformation on any other works and/or activities required in connection with the extraction of materials from the Borrow Pit which are to be constructed and/or undertaken on or from the Property, and\r\nc)\tInformation on any sequencing of material extraction operations for any part of the Borrow Pit located upon the Property;\r\n“Petitioner”\tmeans Richard Peter Boulton of Barn Farm, Riley Hill, Lichfield WS13 8HR;\r\n“Plan 1”\tmeans the plan attached to this assurance highlighted in yellow with the title Plan 1;\r\n“the Property”\tmeans the land and buildings owned by the Petitioner situated within the Act limits (as defined in the Bill) located at Barn Farm, Riley Hill, Lichfield, WS13 8HR;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Assurance on Borrow Pit 1 189 (Eastern Section) – Barn Farm\r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Mr John Ikin, (Fisher German)\r\n","2019-04-18","Assurance"," Borrow Pit 1 (189), located within plot 66 in the Parish of Kings Bromley ","Stafford Borough"]
["C142","The Rail Freight Group and Freightliner","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C142.1","N/A","HoC/0116 & AP2/0026 and HoC/0139 & AP2/0027","The Rail Freight Group and Freightliner","1. Following the outcome of the West Coast Partnership competition, the Secretary of State for Transport will work with the West Coast Partnership and other relevant passenger Franchise Operators in future planning and timetabling discussions to manage respective train service requirements contained within relevant Franchise Agreements, using reasonable endeavours to minimise any impact on freight services operating over that section of the West Coast Main Line Railway that passes through Handsacre junction during the period between the commencement of commercial passenger train services on HS2 Phase 1 and the commencement of commercial passenger train services on HS2 Phase 2a.\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n“Franchise Agreement” and “Franchise Operator” have the same meaning as in section 23 of the Railways Act 1993;\r\n“Train Service Requirements” means the specific train service requirements to be provided for in the Franchise Agreement to be implemented by the West Coast Partnership;\r\n“West Coast Partnership” means the rail passenger franchise responsible for West Coast Main Line railway services incorporating HS2 services;\r\n“West Coast Partnership competition” means the competition to appoint the West Coast Partnership.\r\n","Handsacre Junction","Letter from Jon Griffiths (DfT) to Maggie Simpson, Peter Graham and Pam Thompson, assurance 1","2019-05-07","Assurance","Handsacre junction","Off Route"]
["C142.2","N/A ","HoC/0116 & AP2/0026 and HoC/0139 & AP2/0027","The Rail Freight Group and Freightliner","2. To assist the development of train services, for the introduction of HS2 Phases 1 and 2A, the Secretary of State for Transport will require the West Coast Partnership to prepare a TSS Options Report. The Secretary of State will require each TSS Option to have regard to a range of considerations, including the impact on freight services across the Great Britain railway network. The TSS Options Report will be required to set out the impact on freight services in reasonable detail.\r\nThe West Coast Partnership will be required, in respect of any of the TSS Options contained or to be contained in the TSS Options Report, to consult with each freight service operator as notified by the Secretary of State.\r\nFollowing receipt of the TSS Options Report, the West Coast Partnership will be required to carry out a public consultation on the Train Service Specification. This will inform the Secretary of State’s decision on Train Service Requirements for franchised services. The allocation of capacity is a matter for the Office of Rail and Road, as independent regulator.\r\nIn these assurances:- \r\n“Franchise Agreement” and “Franchise Operator” have the same meaning as in section 23 of the Railways Act 1993;\r\n“Train Service Requirements” means the specific train service requirements to be provided for in the Franchise Agreement to be implemented by the West Coast Partnership;\r\n“Train Service Specification” means the scope of passenger rail services to be provided for in the Franchise Agreement under the West Coast Partnership;\r\n“TSS Option” means a train service specification option to be considered as part of the TSS Options Report;\r\n“TSS Options Report” means a report on a proposed train service specification to be prepared by the West Coast Partnership;\r\n“West Coast Partnership” means the rail passenger franchise responsible for West Coast Main Line railway services incorporating HS2 services;\r\n“West Coast Partnership competition” means the competition to appoint the West Coast Partnership.\r\n","Development of Train Services","Letter from Jon Griffiths (DfT) to Maggie Simpson, Peter Graham and Pam Thompson, assurance 2","2019-05-07","Assurance","Off Route","Off Route"]
["C142.3","N/A","HoC/0116 & AP2/0026 and HoC/0139 & AP2/0027","The Rail Freight Group and Freightliner","1.1\tWhere HS2 works are being constructed on or near the existing railway network the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to arrange that such works shall be carried out either by Network Rail on the nominated undertaker's behalf, or will otherwise be managed in accordance with standard railway asset protection processes and procedures related to railway asset protection and that such works are undertaken in a way which minimises disruption to the existing railway network so far as is reasonably practicable.\r\n1.2 \tWhere the nominated undertaker requires access to the existing railway network for possessions, the Promoter will require the Nominated Undertaker to secure access, using the standard industry processes as described in the Network Code and the National Train Planning Rules that are incorporated within the Network Code.\r\n1.3 \tThe Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to book possessions in accordance with the standard industry processes for planning and managing possessions of the rail network.\r\n1.4 \tWhere compensation is due for the impacts of possessions on Freight Operating Companies, compensation will be available through Network Rail in accordance with standard industry processes.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the ‘Bill’ includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Works on Network Rail Assets","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Maggie Simpson, Peter Graham and Pam Thompson","2019-05-07","Assurance","Off Route","Off Route"]
["C143","Unipart Rail Limited","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C143.1","N/A","N/A","Unipart Rail Limited","Subject to the successful promotion by the Promoter of Additional Provision 2 the Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of permanent compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to Plot 41.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Additional Provision 2” means the second additional provision to the Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 8 February 2019;\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017; and\r\n“the Promoter” means the Secretary of State (or any successor Secretary of State or Minister holding the transport portfolio) and includes so far as relevant any nominated undertakers exercising any powers or functions under the Bill once enacted.\r\n","Promoter of Additional Provision 2","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to The Secretary, (Unipart Rail Limited)","2019-05-08","Assurance","Plot 41 in the Town of Crewe as contained in Schedule 6 of the Bill ","Cheshire East"]
["C143.2","N/A","N/A","Unipart Rail Limited","The Secretary of State shall not exercise the powers of permanent compulsory acquisition conferred by the Bill in relation to Plot 41.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017.\r\n","Promoter of Additional Provision 2","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to The Secretary, (Unipart Rail Limited)","2019-08-02","Assurance","Plot 41 in the Town of Crewe as contained in Schedule 6 of the Bill ","Cheshire East"]
["C144","Royal Mail Group Limited","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C144.1","N/A","HoC/0149","Royal Mail Group Limited","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport","Various","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and The Royal Mail Group Limited","2019-05-02","Undertaking","Weston Road Crewe Road and Nantwick Road","Cheshire East"]
["C145","New Farm Produce","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C145.1","N/A","AP2/0076","New Farm Produce","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport","Various","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and New Farm Produce","2019-05-09","Undertaking","Various","Lichfield District"]
["C146","Canal and River Trust","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C146.1","N/A","AP2/0041","Canal and River Trust","See undertaking signed on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport","Various","Undertaking between the SoS for Transport and Canal and River Trust ","2019-05-31","Undertaking","Various","Routewide"]
["C147","Edney, Karen","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C147.1","N/A","N/A","Karen Edney","1.1\tDuring detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Promoter will, subject to the conditions in    paragraph 1.3, use reasonable endeavours to retain the existing field access.\r\n1.2   If the existing field access can be retained pursuant to paragraph 1.1, the Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to not exercise powers of compulsory acquisition under Schedule 6 of the Bill over Plot AP2-52.\r\n1.3    The conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that the proposed design changes do not:\r\n1.3.1    create any new or different significant environmental effects than those reported in the Environmental Statement; or\r\n1.3.2    prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.4    If the existing field access cannot be retained pursuant to paragraph 1.1, the Promoter will use reasonable endeavours to reduce the impact on plot AP2-52 of the creation of the new field access.\r\n\r\nIn these assurances: \r\n“Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the “Bill” includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“Environmental Statement” means the environmental statement deposited at Parliament with the Bill or the environmental statement deposited at Parliament in relation to the High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands) Bill 2017;\r\n“the existing field access” means the current access from Blithbury Road to Plot 174 shown indicatively and labelled as “Position of existing field access” on Plan 1;\r\n“the new field access” means the proposed new access from Blithbury Road to Plot 174 shown indicatively labelled as “Position of new field access” on plot AP2-54 on Plan 1.\r\n“Plan 1” means the numbered plan attached to this assurance with drawing number C861-ARP-HY-DPL-000-120006;\r\n“Plot 174” means the plot of land in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware shown labelled as “Plot 174” on Plan 1;\r\n“Plot AP2-52” means the plot of land in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware shown labelled as “Plot AP2-52” on Plan 1;\r\n“Plot AP2-54” means the plot of land in the Parish of Mavesyn Ridware shown labelled as “Plot AP2-54 on Plan 1;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n\r\n","Blithbury Road Field Access","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Karen Edney","2019-08-16","Assurance","Access from Blithbury Road to plot 174 as shown on plan attached to assurance letter","Lichfield District"]
["C148","Taylor, Derek","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C148.1","N/A","N/A","Derek Taylor","1.1. Subject to the conditions in 1.2, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, in undertaking the detailed design of that part of the Gas Pipeline Works that affects the Paddock Land to give consideration to so designing Work No. 32 across the Paddock Land so as to avoid the necessity to prevent the Petitioner from being able to access the Paddock Land for the duration of the Gas Pipeline Works.\r\n1.2  The conditions that the nominated undertaker shall have regard to in considering the design of the Gas Pipeline Works shall include:-\r\n1.2.1 the requirement for the proposed alignment of the entirety of Work No. 32 must be accommodated within the powers of the Bill and Additional Provision 2 without requiring any other third party land interests in respect of any other part of Work No. 32;\r\n1.2.2 the requirement for the consent of the relevant utility company concerned with the operation and maintenance of the Gas Pipeline Works; and\r\n1.2.3 the requirement to ensure that the Gas Pipeline Works do not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\n1.3 In the event that the nominated undertaker is unable to construct the Gas Pipeline Works without requiring exclusive occupation of the Paddock Land, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to complete the detailed design of the Gas Pipeline Works. In carrying out the detailed design the nominated undertaker shall have regard to the need to reduce so far as reasonably practicable the length of time that the Paddock Land is required to construct and maintain the Gas Pipeline Works.\r\n1.4 Subject to agreement on scope and rates in advance the nominated undertaker shall pay to the Petitioner the professional costs reasonably and properly incurred by the Petitioner from the date of this assurance and to the date of relocation for undertaking the search for and securing appropriate temporary grazing and stabling facilities for the temporary loss of the Paddock Land as a consequence of the construction of the Gas Pipeline Works pursuant to 1.3.\r\n1.5 In constructing the works required for the Proposed Scheme the nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to provide the Petitioner with a pedestrian gate in the position marked on the attached drawing.”\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Gas Pipeline Works” means the construction of a gas main comprised within Work No. 32;\r\n“Paddock Land” means land parcels shown on the deposited plans for Additional Provision 2 and numbered AP 2-24;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of High Speed 2 as defined in clause 1(3) of the Bill.\r\n","Gas Pipeline Works","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Derek Taylor","2019-07-31","Assurance","Paddock Land as shown on the deposited plans for Additional Provision 2 and numbered AP 2-24\r\n","Lichfield District"]
["C149","Goodwin, Simon and Dawn","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C149.1","N/A","N/A","Simon and Dawn Goodwin","The Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to not exercise the powers to occupy land under the Bill in relation to Plot 231 in the Parish of Kings Bromley as shown on the attached plan.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n “Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands-Crewe) Bill as deposited in the House of Commons on 17 July 2017 incorporating the Additional Provisions and references to the “Bill” includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill.\r\n","Requirement not to exercise powers to occupy land","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Simon and Dawn Goodwin","2019-08-14","Assurance","Plot 231 in the Parish of Kings Bromley","Lichfield District"]
["C150","Hopton and Coton Parish Council","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C150.1","N/A","HoL/0011","Hopton and Coton Parish Council","1.1\tThe Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to restrict HS2 Large Goods Vehicles from using Within Lane between its existing junction with the A518 Weston Road and the B5066 Sandon Road during the Construction Period, except:\r\n(a)\tin circumstances where works can only be accessed via Within Lane; or\r\n(b)\tin circumstances where it is required to do so by the relevant planning authority under the powers conferred on it by paragraph 6 of Schedule 17 to the Bill; or\r\n(c)\tin the case of emergency or if directed to do so by the police or emergency services; or\r\n(d)\twhere, it would prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme.\r\nIn these assurances: \r\n “the Construction Period” means the period from commencement of any works for construction and delivery of the Proposed Scheme until completion of those works;\r\n“Large Goods Vehicle” has the same meaning as in Part 4 of the Road Traffic Act 1988;\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill. \r\n","HS2 HGV Construction Traffic","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Sylvia Gibson, (Hopton and Coton Parish Council)","2019-08-21","Assurance","Within Lane between its existing junction with the A518 Weston Road and the B5066 Sandon Road","Stafford Borough"]
["C150.2","N/A","HoL/0011","Hopton and Coton Parish Council","Subject to having the necessary rights and consents to erect such signage at the locations in question, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to use reasonable endeavours to provide appropriate signage stating “No HS2 HGV construction traffic” at the junction of Within Lane and the A518 Weston Road and the junction of Within Lane and the B5066 Sandon Road during the Construction Period.\r\nIn these assurances: \r\n “the Construction Period” means the period from commencement of any works for construction and delivery of the Proposed Scheme until completion of those works.\r\n\r\n","Signage","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Sylvia Gibson, (Hopton and Coton Parish Council)","2019-08-21","Assurance","Within Lane between its existing junction with the A518 Weston Road and the B5066 Sandon Road","Stafford Borough"]
["C150.3","N/A","HoL/0011","Hopton and Coton Parish Council","The Promoter will procure that an ecological survey of Hopton Pools is carried out by a suitably qualified ecological specialist subject to the landowner of Hopton Pools granting the necessary rights to access Hopton Pools and to carry out that ecological survey. The Promoter will inform the Petitioner of the results of the ecological survey carried out pursuant to this paragraph.\r\nIn this assurance: \r\n“Hopton Pools” means the area highlighted in red on the attached EC-01-307 Designated Sites Map.\r\n","Hopton Pools ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Sylvia Gibson, (Hopton and Coton Parish Council)","2019-08-21","Assurance","Hopton Pools","Stafford Borough"]
["C150.4","N/A","HoL/0011","Hopton and Coton Parish Council","1.1.   The Promoter will provide a contribution of up to £350,000 (three hundred and fifty thousand pounds) (“the contribution”) towards the improvement of community facilities or the local environment in the Parish of Hopton and Coton.   These funds will be released to the Parish Council following the nominated undertaker’s review of the Parish Council’s proposals and will be subject to:\r\n1.1.1.\tthe commencement of construction of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.1.2.\tall required consents and approvals in relation to any community facility or environmental improvement works being obtained by Hopton and Coton Parish Council;\r\n1.1.3.\tthe nominated undertaker being provided with detailed estimates to evidence the costs that will be incurred;   \r\n1.1.4.     a requirement that the contribution is applied only to community facility and local environment improvement works in the Parish of Hopton and Coton and that any proposals by Hopton and Coton Parish Council meet the appropriate standards for managing public money and that Hopton and Coton Parish Council provide the nominated undertaker with any evidence required to support this requirement on request.\r\n1.2.   Nothing in paragraph 1.1 will prevent Hopton and Coton Parish Council from making an application to the nominated undertaker’s Community and Environmental Fund or the Business and Local Economy Fund.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","Hopton and Coton Parish Fund","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Sylvia Gibson, (Hopton and Coton Parish Council)","2019-10-18","Assurance","The Parish of Hopton and Coton","Stafford Borough"]
["C151","Highways England","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C151.1","N/A","N/A","Highways England","1. The nominated undertaker will consult Highways England throughout the further development and detailed design of the junction works, including any proposals for replacement of the pedestrian access across the Hanchurch Interchange, and will not submit a consent application under clause 3(1) of the Bill until a suitable layout has been agreed with Highways England.\r\n2. During detailed design for the junction works the nominated undertaker will:\r\na. engage with Highways England to understand the potential for conflict with, any future Highways England scheme at the junction during RIS periods 2 or 3 (2020 – 2030), and will seek so far as reasonably practicable to reduce the scope for such conflict; and \r\nb. agree appropriate modelling for the proposed design with Highways England, in advance of the commencement of the design of the junction works. \r\n3. If additional land or rights are needed to deliver the agreed design for the junction works, as approved by Highways England under paragraph 1 above, the nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to secure these, including through providing support for the use of compulsory purchase powers by Staffordshire County Council or Highways England, as appropriate, where this is reasonable.\r\n4. This assurance is given on the understanding that- \r\na. agreement under paragraphs 1 and 2(b) is not to be unreasonably withheld, and any dispute as to whether agreement has been unreasonably withheld will be referred to the Secretary of State for determination;  \r\nb. an agreement under paragraph 1 is to be taken into account by Highways England when considering the granting of consent for the purpose of clause 3(1) of the Bill; and\r\nc. the commitment under paragraph 2(a) is subject to and dependent on Highways England providing relevant design details of its schemes to the nominated undertaker in a timely way and working with the nominated undertaker in the design of Highways England’s own schemes to reduce the scope for conflict.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined in the Bill;\r\n“RIS period” means the Road Investment Strategy five-year period, as published by the Department for Transport and Highways England, for the planning, improvement, operation and maintenance of the Strategic Road Network.\r\n","Hanchurch Interchange","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Peter Fisher ","2019-08-22","Assurance","Junction 15 of the M6 and the interaction with the A500 (Queensway), known locally as the Hanchurch Interchange\r\n","Off Route"]
["C152","Witter, Mr D G and Mrs E M Witter","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C152.1","N/A","HoL/0006","Mr D G and Mrs E M Witter","1.1\tDuring the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions at paragraph 1.2, to use reasonable endeavours to relocate the Woodland Mitigation on the Property by relocating the Woodland Mitigation at the Orange Land to the Red Land for the purposes of the Petitioner’s efficient management of the agricultural operations at the Land holding. \r\n1.2\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are that: \r\n1.2.1\tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the relocation of the Woodland Mitigation can be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement;\r\n1.2.2\tthe Secretary of State concluding that the Woodland Mitigation does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.3\tin the event of the Woodland Mitigation being delivered on the Red Land in lieu of the Orange Land there is any reduction in the extent of the Woodland Mitigation planting from that proposed under the Bill to be delivered, any such reduction in Woodland Mitigation receiving the approval of the local planning authority under paragraph 9 of Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n1.2.4\tthe Secretary of State secures any necessary planning permissions, consents and approvals for the use of the Red Land for Woodland Mitigation prior to the commencement of works;\r\n1.2.5\tthe Red Land being sufficient to accommodate the Woodland Mitigation intended for the Orange Land; \r\n1.2.6\tthe Secretary of State being satisfied that the Petitioner is the appropriate person, having regard to the nature and objectives of the Woodland Mitigation required to be provided, to be responsible for securing the maintenance of the ecological mitigation planting after the initial maintenance period to be agreed between the nominated undertaker and Petitioner;\r\n1.2.7\tthe Petitioner enters into an agreement in a form satisfactory to the Secretary of State which provides for the on-going maintenance and monitoring of the Woodland Mitigation planting within the Red Land; and\r\n1.2.8\tthe Secretary of State being satisfied that the Red Land is not subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the maintenance, monitoring or the objectives of the Woodland Mitigation planting required to be provided on the Red Land; and.\r\n1.3\tNothing in this assurance shall prevent the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred by the Bill over the Orange Land to the extent that the Red Land is insufficient to accommodate the Woodland Mitigation. \r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“Orange Land” means the land coloured orange on the attached plan, being within the Property which has been identified for the purposed of Woodland Mitigation for the Proposed Scheme;\r\n“Petitioner” Mr D G Witter and Mrs E M Witter;\r\n“Property” means land within the Petitioner’s ownership including Yew Tree Farm, Main Road, Weston, Crewe CW2 5LA;\r\n“Red Land” means the land coloured red on the attached plan being land within the Property which has been identified within Additional Provision 2 as suitable for the relocation of the Woodland Mitigation from the Orange Land;\r\n“the Secretary of State” means the Secretary of State for Transport;\r\n“Woodland Mitigation” means the proposed creation of woodland mitigation at the Property; and\r\n“Yellow Land” means the land coloured yellow on the attached plan being land within the Property which has been identified within Additional Provision 2 as suitable for the purposes of relocating temporary material stockpiles from the Purple Land.\r\n","Relocation of Woodland Mitigation","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Co), assurance 1","2019-10-18","Assurance","Yew Tree Farm, Main Road, Weston, Crewe CW2 5LA","Cheshire East"]
["C152.2","N/A","HoL/0006","Mr D G and Mrs E M Witter","2.1.\tDuring the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 2.3, to use reasonable endeavours to relocate the local placement from the Pink Land to the Blue Land within the Property. \r\n2.2.\tDuring the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker, subject to the conditions in paragraph 2.3, to use reasonable endeavours to relocate the temporary material stockpiles from the Purple Land to the Yellow Land within the Property. \r\n2.3.\tThe conditions referred to in paragraph 2.1 and 2.2 are that:\r\n2.3.1\tthe Secretary of State is satisfied that the relocation of the local placement and temporary material stockpiles can be delivered without giving rise to any new or different significant effects from those assessed in the Environmental Statement;\r\n2.3.2\tthe Secretary of State concluding that the relocation of the local placement and temporary material stockpiles does not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n2.3.3\tthe proposed relocation of the temporary material stockpiles and local placement receives any required approvals from the local planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill;\r\n2.3.4\tthe Secretary of State secures any necessary planning permissions, consents and approvals for the use of the Blue Land and Yellow Land for local placement and temporary material stockpiles prior to the commencement of works;\r\n2.3.5\tthe Blue Land and Yellow Land being sufficient to accommodate the local placement and temporary material stockpile intended for the Pink Land and Purple Land;\r\n 2.3.6\tthe Secretary of State being satisfied that the Blue Land and Yellow Land is not subject to any third party rights of any description which would prejudice the construction, maintenance or the objectives of the local placement and temporary material stockpiles planting required to be provided on the Pink Land and Purple Land; and\r\n2.3.7\tthe Blue Land and Yellow Land is at the disposal of the Secretary of State for the purposes of relocating local placement and temporary material stockpiles.\r\n2.4.\tNothing in this assurance shall prevent the Secretary of State from exercising the powers conferred by the Bill over the Pink Land and Purple Land to the extent that the Blue Land and Yellow Land is insufficient to accommodate the local placement and temporary material stockpiles.\r\nIn these assurances:\r\n“Blue Land” means the area coloured blue on the attached plan being land within the Property which has been identified within Additional Provision 2 as land suitable for the relocation of local placement from the Purple Land;\r\n“Petitioner” Mr D G Witter and Mrs E M Witter;\r\n“Pink Land” means the land coloured pink on the attached plan being land within the Property which has been identified for the purposes of local placement;\r\n“Property” means land within the Petitioner’s ownership including Yew Tree Farm, Main Road, Weston, Crewe CW2 5LA;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill;\r\n“Purple Land” means the land coloured purple on the attached plan being land within the Property which has been identified for the purposes of Temporary Material Stockpiles;\r\n“Woodland Mitigation” means the proposed creation of woodland mitigation at the Property; and\r\n“Yellow Land” means the land coloured yellow on the attached plan being land within the Property which has been identified within Additional Provision 2 as suitable for the purposes of relocating temporary material stockpiles from the Purple Land.\r\n","Relocation of local placement and temporary material stockpile \r\n","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Roger Bedson (Hinson Parry & Co), assurance 2","2019-10-18","Assurance","Yew Tree Farm, Main Road, Weston, Crewe CW2 5LA","Cheshire East"]
["C153","Silverwood, J D and CHADS","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C153.1","N/A","HoL/0017","J D Silverwood and CHADS","1.1\tThe Promoter will require the nominated undertaker for a period of 12 months from the date of Royal Assent to:-\r\na)\tkeep under review whether there are likely to be any suitable opportunities for CHADS to be involved in the detailed design or carrying out of the Grassland Habitat Works, subject to the nominated undertaker having regard at all times during such a review that the purpose of the Grassland Habitat Works is to mitigate the ecological impact of the Proposed Scheme; and \r\nb)\treport to the trustees of CHADS on a six month basis as to whether the nominated undertaker has identified any suitable opportunities pursuant to paragraph 1.1(a) above. \r\n1.2\tIn the event that the nominated undertaker identifies and reports any suitable opportunity pursuant to paragraphs 1.1(a) and 1.1(b) above then the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to engage with CHADS with a view to seeking CHADS involvement in the identified and reported opportunity.\r\n“In these assurances:\r\n“Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as introduced in the House of Lords on 16 July 2019 and references to “Bill” includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“CHADS” means the Combined Handicapped and Disabled Society with registered charity number 700374;\r\n “the Environmental Statement”  means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme, including any supplementary environmental statement, and accompanying the Bill;\r\n “Grassland Habitat Works” means the works for the creation of the grassland habitat to be constructed within the land (being land at Bromley Lane Farm) that is shown edged turquoise on Maps CT-06-204 and CT-06-204-L1 of Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement that are attached to this assurance;\r\n “the Lease” means a lease of the Purple Land on terms which includes (among other things) the terms in paragraph 2.3 below;\r\n“the nominated undertaker” refers to the body or bodies appointed by the Secretary of State to carry out powers conferred under the Bill to construct and maintain the scheme. The nominated undertaker may be HS2 Ltd, or it may be another body or bodies appointed to oversee the construction and operation of Phase 2a; \r\n“the Promoter” means the Secretary of State (or any successor Secretary of State or Minister holding the transport portfolio) and includes so far as relevant any nominated undertakers exercising any powers or functions under the Bill once enacted;\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; \r\n“Purple Land” means the area of land forming part of Bromley Lane Farm that is shown edged purple on Replacement Sheet Nos. 1-11 and 1-12 of the  plans deposited with the Bill which are attached to this assurance. For the avoidance of doubt, references in this assurance to “Purple Land” excludes any land forming part of Bromley Lane Farm on which buildings may be wholly or partially located; and\r\n“Royal Assent” means the date when Royal Assent is given to the Bill. \r\n","Grassland Habitat Works ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J D Silverwood and CHADS","2019-11-05","Assurance","The creation of the grassland habitat to be constructed within the land (being land at Bromley Lane Farm) that is shown edged turquoise on Maps CT-06-204 and CT-06-204-L1 of Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement","Stafford Borough"]
["C153.2","N/A","HoL/0017","J D Silverwood and CHADS","2.1 The Promoter will for a period of 12 months from the date of Royal Assent use reasonable endeavours to agree a Lease of the Purple Land with the trustees of CHADS on terms acceptable to the Promoter (which shall include the terms at paragraph 2.3 below) and provided always that the conditions in paragraph 2.2 below are also satisfied within that same 12 month period. \r\n2.2 The conditions referred to in paragraph 2.1 above are:\r\na) The Promoter obtaining unencumbered freehold title to the Purple Land;\r\nb) The Promoter being satisfied that the trustees of CHADS are appropriate persons, having regard to the nature and objectives of any mitigation planting to be provided on the Purple Land, to be responsible for securing its retention and maintenance; and\r\nc) The terms of the disposition of the Purple Land being in compliance with the Crichel Down Rules and HS2 Phase 2a Information Paper C6: Disposal of Surplus Land.\r\n2.3 The proposed terms of the lease include the following:\r\na) the use of the land shall be for agricultural use;  \r\nb) the land shall be subject to such covenants as the Promoter considers necessary to secure the long term establishment, maintenance and retention of the mitigation planting to be carried out on the Purple Land as part of the Proposed Scheme;\r\nc) the land shall be subject to such covenants as the Promoter considers necessary to protect any of the works authorised by the Bill;\r\nd) the term shall be for a period of 5 years commencing on a date after any of the Grassland Habitat Works which are to be constructed on the Purple Land  have been planted on the Purple Land and have been sufficiently established for the Purple Land to be used pursuant to the Lease;\r\ne) the lease shall not be subject to any right of renewal or extension;\r\nf) the lease shall be for a market rent;\r\ng) the lease shall contain forfeiture provisions and insurance obligations; and\r\nh) it shall include the reservation of any rights as the Promoter considers necessary\r\n“In these assurances:\r\n“Bill” means the High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) Bill as introduced in the House of Lords on 16 July 2019 and references to “Bill” includes any Act of Parliament enacting that Bill;\r\n“CHADS” means the Combined Handicapped and Disabled Society with registered charity number 700374;\r\n “the Environmental Statement”  means the environmental statement prepared for the Proposed Scheme, including any supplementary environmental statement, and accompanying the Bill;\r\n “Grassland Habitat Works” means the works for the creation of the grassland habitat to be constructed within the land (being land at Bromley Lane Farm) that is shown edged turquoise on Maps CT-06-204 and CT-06-204-L1 of Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement that are attached to this assurance;\r\n “the Lease” means a lease of the Purple Land on terms which includes (among other things) the terms in paragraph 2.3 below;\r\n“the nominated undertaker” refers to the body or bodies appointed by the Secretary of State to carry out powers conferred under the Bill to construct and maintain the scheme. The nominated undertaker may be HS2 Ltd, or it may be another body or bodies appointed to oversee the construction and operation of Phase 2a; \r\n“the Promoter” means the Secretary of State (or any successor Secretary of State or Minister holding the transport portfolio) and includes so far as relevant any nominated undertakers exercising any powers or functions under the Bill once enacted;\r\n “the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill; \r\n“Purple Land” means the area of land forming part of Bromley Lane Farm that is shown edged purple on Replacement Sheet Nos. 1-11 and 1-12 of the  plans deposited with the Bill which are attached to this assurance. For the avoidance of doubt, references in this assurance to “Purple Land” excludes any land forming part of Bromley Lane Farm on which buildings may be wholly or partially located; and\r\n“Royal Assent” means the date when Royal Assent is given to the Bill. \r\n","Lease of part of Bromley Lane Farm","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to J D Silverwood and CHADS\r\n","2019-11-05","Assurance","The \"Purple Land” meaning the area of land forming part of Bromley Lane Farm that is shown edged purple on Replacement Sheet Nos. 1-11 and 1-12 of the  plans deposited with the Bill","Stafford Borough"]
["C154","Hamstall Ridware Parish Council","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C154.1","N/A","HoL/0014","Hamstall Ridware Parish Council","1.1\tSubject to the conditions at paragraph 1.2, during the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme the Secretary of State will require the nominated undertaker to remove the reported Community Noise Effect at Nethertown.\r\n1.2\tThe conditions referred to at paragraph 1.1 are that any measures taken:\r\n1.2.1\twould not prejudice the safe, timely and economic delivery of the Proposed Scheme;\r\n1.2.2\tcan be delivered within the powers contained in the Bill;\r\n1.2.3\tdo not result in any new or different significant environmental effects than those assessed in the Environmental Statement; and\r\n1.2.4\tare subject to any required approvals of the relevant local planning authority under Schedule 17 to the Bill and provided that any conditions on such approvals are reasonable.\r\nIn this assurance:\r\n“Environmental Statement” means environmental statement including any supplementary environmental statement deposited into the House of Commons with the Bill and/or the Additional Provisions;\r\n“Community Noise Effect at Nethertown” means the likely moderate adverse significant effect on the acoustic character of the area around the properties in Nethertown reported under OSV01-C02 in Table 26 of Volume 2, Community Area 1: Fradley to Colton Report of the Environmental Statement;\r\n“the Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill.\r\n","Nethertown Noise Mitigation ","Letter from Oliver Bayne (HS2) to Dr Carter","2020-03-16","Assurance","Nethertown, Hamstall Ridware Parish Council,WS15 3QH","Lichfield District"]
["C155","Newcastle Road Residents","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C155.1","N/A","HoL/0022","Newcastle Road Residents","1. During the detailed design of the Proposed Scheme, the Promoter will require the nominated undertaker to engage with the Newcastle Road Residents to seek to address their safety concerns in relation to the A500 Queensway and the A519 Newcastle Road in the Parish of Swynnerton. \r\n2. For the avoidance of doubt, the implementation of any proposed measures arising from the engagement under paragraph 1 would be subject to the approval of the relevant highway authority.\r\n\r\nIn this assurance: -\r\n“Newcastle Road Residents” means those residents listed in the petition against the Bill submitted to the House of Lords and given the reference ‘HS2-HOL-022’;\r\n“Proposed Scheme” means Phase 2a of HS2 as defined further in the Bill. \r\n","Safety Concerns","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Mrs Morris-Goostrey","2020-11-23","Assurance","A500 Queensway and the A519 Newcastle Road in the Parish of Swynnerton","Stafford Borough"]
["C156","Natural England","N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["C156.1","N/A","N/A","Natural England","The nominated undertaker will use reasonable endeavours to source at least two thirds of the required seed stock from Great Britain.  In addition, the nominated undertaker will consult with the Forestry Commission and Natural England to ensure the remaining third is procured from an appropriate region of provenance with a view to securing, where practicable, as much seed stock from local provenances within Great Britain to minimise the requirement for non-British sources whilst ensuring the best opportunity for resilience to climate change. All seed stocks and suppliers shall comply with the latest biosecurity certification standards.  This will ensure a proactive approach to climate change resilience, whilst adopting a balanced provenance portfolio for mitigation planting.\r\n","Seed Stock","Letter from Simon Knight (HS2) to Kathleen Covill ","2020-11-23","Assurance","Routewide","Routewide"]
["C157","Alice Witter, Angela Joy Witter, Emily Witter, Lucy Witter, William Thomas Witter"]
["C157.1","N/A","HoL/0031","Alice Witter, Angela Joy Witter, Emily Witter, Lucy Witter, William Thomas Witter","Undertaking between the Secretary of State for Transport and Alice Witter, Angela Joy Witter, Emily Witter, Lucy Witter, William Thomas Witter","Various","See undertaking  signed on behalf of the SoS for Transport and  Alice Witter, Angela Joy Witter, Emily Witter, Lucy Witter, William Thomas Witter","2020-09-28","Undertaking","Various","Routewide"]
["N/A\t","Section D: undertakings pending completion at Royal Assent\t\t","N/A\t","N/A",null,"N/A\t","N/A\t\t",null,"N/A","N/A","N/A"]
["D1","N/A","HoC/0150","Severn Trent Water","Pending undertaking between the Secretary of State for Transport and Severn Trent Water","Various","See pending undertaking to be signed on behalf of the SoS for Transport and Severn Trent Water",null,"Undertaking","Routewide","Routewide"]
["D2","N/A","HoL/0003\t\t\t\t","Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd","Pending undertaking given by The Secretary of State for Transport and Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, and Graham Ward Farms Limited","Various\t","See pending undertaking to be signed on behalf of the SoS for Transport and Graham Ward 2010 Discretionary Will Trust, Graham Ward 1998 Children's Life Interest Settlement, Graham Ward Will Trust, Graham Ward Farms Ltd",null,"Undertaking","Various","N/A"]
["D4","N/A","HoL/0010","Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","Pending undertaking between the Secretary of State for Transport and Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders","Various","See pending undertaking to be signed on behalf of the SoS for Transport and Mr Mark Madders, Mr James Madders, Mr Robert Madders and Mrs Mary Madders",null,"Undertaking","Various","N/A"]
["D6","N/A","HoC/0141","Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council","Pending undertaking between the Secretary of State for Transport and Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council ","Heritage agreement","See pending undertaking to be signed on behalf of the SoS for Transport and Newcastle-under-Lyme",null,"Undertaking","Various","Newcastle-under-Lyme"]
["D7","N/A","HoC/0141","Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council","Pending undertaking between the Secretary of State for Transport and Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council ","Heritage agreement","See pending undertaking to be signed on behalf of the SoS for Transport and Newcastle-under-Lyme",null,"Undertaking","Various","Newcastle-under-Lyme"]
["D9","N/A","N/A","Homes and Communities Agency (trading as Homes England)","Pending undertaking between the Secretary of State for Transport and Homes and Communities Agency (trading as Homes England)","Various","See pending undertaking to be signed on behalf of the SoS for Transport and Homes and Communities Agency (trading as Homes England)",null,"Undertaking","Various","N/A"]
["D10","N/A","HoL/0021","Priory Education Services ","Pending undertaking between the Secretary of State for Transport and Priory Services Education","Various","See pending undertaking to be signed on behalf of the SoS for Transport and Priory Education",null,"Undertaking","Various","N/A"]