{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":9,"sheets":["Version Control","Personal Details"," ACS1 - Core","ACS2 - TAw","ACS3 - CAw"," ACS4 - Aircraft Systems","ACS5 - Air SM","ACS6 - RTS-MPTF","Additional Req"],"not_rendered":{"charts":99,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":0,"defined_names":17,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Version Control","index":0,"n_rows":8,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":8,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2]]}
["MAA AIRWORTHINESS COMPETENCE SET CHANGE MANAGEMENT"]
[]
["Version","Date","Details of Change"]
[1,"2015-06-01","Initial Version"]
[1,"2015-11-01","ACS001/04 - System Safety SQEP Criteria added.\nACS001/07 - Configuration Management SQEP Criteria added."]
["2.X","2022-02-01","Ammended to reflect ACS V2"]
[2.1,"2022-05-01","Fix formatting - locked cell."]
[2.2000000000000002,"2023-02-01","Correct ACS5 CellE 9 (duplicated of E10). Fix other formatting issues."]

{"sheet":"Personal Details","index":1,"n_rows":40,"n_cols":13,"rows_kept":40,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[36,5,36,6],[48,12,48,13],[53,1,53,4],[52,1,52,4],[49,1,49,4],[50,1,50,4],[51,1,51,4],[45,1,45,4],[46,1,46,4],[47,1,47,4],[48,1,48,4],[44,1,44,4],[40,1,40,4],[42,1,42,4],[43,1,43,4],[42,8,42,11],[49,5,49,6],[50,5,50,6],[51,5,51,6],[52,5,52,6],[48,5,48,6],[52,8,52,11],[53,8,53,11],[38,1,38,13],[40,8,40,11],[41,1,41,4],[45,12,45,13],[44,8,44,11],[45,8,45,11],[46,12,46,13],[42,5,42,6],[43,5,43,6],[44,5,44,6],[45,5,45,6],[46,5,46,6],[41,12,41,13],[47,5,47,6],[2,0,54,0],[47,12,47,13],[53,12,53,13],[3,4,3,13],[30,7,30,10],[33,11,33,13],[41,8,41,11],[31,7,31,10],[33,7,33,10],[49,12,49,13],[50,12,50,13],[51,12,51,13],[52,12,52,13],[50,8,50,11],[49,8,49,11],[51,8,51,11],[48,8,48,11],[53,5,53,6],[46,8,46,11],[47,8,47,11],[35,7,35,10],[36,7,36,10],[34,11,34,13],[35,11,35,13],[36,11,36,13],[44,12,44,13],[42,12,42,13],[34,7,34,10],[43,8,43,11],[15,3,15,6],[16,3,16,6],[30,5,30,6],[31,5,31,6],[32,5,32,6],[32,7,32,10],[30,11,30,13],[33,5,33,6],[43,12,43,13],[39,1,39,4],[39,8,39,11],[31,11,31,13],[32,11,32,13],[26,7,26,10],[27,7,27,10],[28,7,28,10],[17,11,17,13],[40,12,40,13],[34,5,34,6],[35,5,35,6],[40,5,40,6],[41,5,41,6],[1,4,1,7],[17,3,17,6],[13,11,13,13],[15,11,15,13],[19,3,19,6],[20,3,20,6],[19,11,19,13],[24,1,24,13],[22,4,22,5],[22,1,22,2],[1,10,1,13],[9,3,9,6],[13,1,13,2],[5,8,5,9],[3,1,3,3],[9,1,9,2],[11,1,11,2],[5,2,5,6],[7,2,7,6],[11,3,11,13],[5,10,5,13],[14,3,14,6],[13,8,13,9],[13,3,13,6],[25,11,25,13],[18,3,18,6],[29,7,29,10],[26,11,26,13],[29,5,29,6],[27,11,27,13],[28,11,28,13],[29,11,29,13],[22,9,22,10],[17,8,17,9],[26,5,26,6],[27,5,27,6],[28,5,28,6]]}
[null,"MAA_ACS_Assessment_Tool_Iss_2.2"]
[null,"LoE Application for Position",null,null,null,null,null,null,"Organisation:",null," "]
["PERSONAL DETAILS"]
[null,"Equipment responsible for:",null,null," "]
[]
[null,"Surname:",null,null,null,null,null,null,"First Name:"]
[]
[null,"Title/Rank:"," "]
[]
[null,"Post Nominals:"]
[]
[null,"Current Job Title:"]
[]
[null,"Current Address:",null," ",null,null,null,null,"Current  Tel Nos:"]
[null,null,null," "]
[null,null,null," "]
[null,null,null," "]
[null,null,null," ",null,null,null,null,"Current Email:"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Post Code"]
[]
[null,"Submission Check List",null,null,"ACS Self Assessment",null,null,"CV",null,"Post Profile",null,null,"TOR"]
[]
[null,"Chronology (Last 10 years)"]
[null,"From","To","Org","Project","Post",null,"Responsibilities",null,null,null,"Airworthiness Delegation held"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"Qualifications and relavent training courses:  Include those that specifically relate to or equivalent to Airworthiness or Air Safety"]
[null,"Qualification/Traning Course",null,null,null,"Date",null,null,"Qualification/Traning Course",null,null,null,"Date"]

{"sheet":" ACS1 - Core","index":2,"n_rows":41,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":41,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,7,3,7],[0,8,0,10],[1,10,3,10],[1,8,3,8],[1,9,3,9],[4,0,40,0],[0,6,3,6],[0,5,3,5],[0,4,3,4],[1,1,3,1],[1,2,3,2],[1,3,3,3],[0,1,0,3]]}
[null,{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$B$1","v":"MAA_ACS_Assessment_Tool_Iss_2.2"},null,null,"SQEP Criteria",null,"Evidence Available","Minimum SQEP Level",{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$C$6","v":0}]
[null,"Current Competences","SQEP Requirement","Outcome",null,null,null,null,"Applicant Score","Assessor Score","Assessor Comments"]
[]
[]
["ACS1- CORE FUNCTIONS","ACS1.1(1)","Defence Aviation Context","Has knowledge and understanding of MOD's Air Safety organizational construct, and the practices of Airworthiness and safety engineering as they apply to the programme in question.","Practitioner: Has worked on an Airworthiness project to demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding of how safety requirements are addressed and satisfactorily applied MOD's Air Safety methods, techniques, technologies and Airworthiness practices.\n\nExpert: Can provide advice and guidance on the MOD’s Air Safety methods, techniques, technologies and Airworthiness practices as a recognised subject matter expert demonstrating deep understanding in both breadth and depth of the Defence Air Environment.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.1(2)","Defence Aviation Context","Has knowledge and understanding of MOD's Air Safety organizational construct, and the practices of Airworthiness and safety engineering as they apply to the programme in question.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding of how a range of Air Systems are used within the Defence Air Environment.\n\nExpert: Can provide advice and guidance on how a broad range of Air Systems are used within the Defence Air Environment, as a recognised subject matter expert.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.1(3)","Defence Aviation Context","Has knowledge and understanding of MOD's Air Safety organizational construct, and the practices of Airworthiness and safety engineering as they apply to the programme in question.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding of all Air Safety roles defined in regulations and the MOD’s Air Safety organizational construct for satisfying those roles.\n\nExpert: Has extensive direct experience and knowledge of working directly with a wide range of Air Safety organizations in a variety of Air Safety roles.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.1(4)","Defence Aviation Context","Has knowledge and understanding of MOD's Air Safety organizational construct, and the practices of Airworthiness and safety engineering as they apply to the programme in question.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding to shape the Air Safety programme(s) to which the individual is assigned.\n\nExpert: Has extensive direct experience of working on Air Safety programmes at different stages of the project lifecycle.  Is able to apply a strategic level of knowledge and understanding of Air Safety across a multitude of programme(s). Demonstrates the ability to shape, lead and deliver the Air Safety programme.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.2(1)","Air Safety Regulations & Policy","Has knowledge and understanding of all relevant Air Safety policies, regulations and legal requirements.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding of MOD Air Safety policy, regulation and legal requirements, including which organizations act as regulators to which regulation (eg Weapon vs Air System. \nCan demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding of the policy, principles, procedures and guidance of the Air Safety Management System, how legal, regulatory and MOD-specific safety requirements are addressed. \n\nExpert: Has extensive understanding of MOD Air Safety policy, regulation and legal requirements and the impact of not meeting them. \nIs able to apply extensive knowledge and understanding to justify the approach for meeting the relevant regulatory, legal and MOD-specific safety policies and other requirements in the Air Safety Management System.\nHas extensive experience engaging with multiple regulatory bodies to address Air Safety requirements.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.3(1)","Air Safety Behaviours","Exhibits appropriate behaviours when undertaking Air Safety activities.  Correctly assigns priorities and makes sound engineering judgements. Provides appropriate advice to external stakeholders and seeks advice when required.","Practitioner: Is able to recognise the limits of one’s own Air Safety competence and to seek the appropriate (Technical/ISA/ITE/SME/TAA/Other delegation-holder) advice, when required.\n\nExpert:.Has deep understanding in both breadth and depth of the need to recognise the limits of one’s own Air Safety competence and to seek the appropriate (Technical/ISA/ITE/SME/TAA/Other delegation-holder) advice, when required.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.3(2)","Air Safety Behaviours","Exhibits appropriate behaviours when undertaking Air Safety activities.  Correctly assigns priorities and makes sound engineering judgements. Provides appropriate advice to external stakeholders and seeks advice when required.","Practitioner: . Is appropriately proactive in prioritising and addressing issues affecting the safe operation of Air Systems.\n\nExpert:  .Establishes and uses a systematic approach to observing, prioritising and addressing issues affecting the safe operation of Air Systems.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.3(3)","Air Safety Behaviours","Exhibits appropriate behaviours when undertaking Air Safety activities.  Correctly assigns priorities and makes sound engineering judgements. Provides appropriate advice to external stakeholders and seeks advice when required.","Practitioner: Can explain the different methods they have used and considered for providing reports and/or advice on Airworthiness and identify the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Has provided at least one report and/or piece of advice to the safety executive in support of Airworthiness requirements. \n\nExpert: Has reported directly to the safety executive on a significant range of Airworthiness issues, successfully presenting a resolution strategy and managing its implementation through to acceptance/resolution of the issue. Has established an effective system for providing advice on Airworthiness and is generally recognised as a source of sound advice on issues of Airworthiness.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.3(4)","Air Safety Behaviours","Exhibits appropriate behaviours when undertaking Air Safety activities.  Correctly assigns priorities and makes sound engineering judgements. Provides appropriate advice to external stakeholders and seeks advice when required.","Practitioner: Has satisfactorily exercised sound Air Safety judgement and made risk-based decisions.\n\nExpert: Has extensive expertise in exercising sound Air Safety judgement and to make risk-based decisions.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.3(5)","Air Safety Behaviours","Exhibits appropriate behaviours when undertaking Air Safety activities.  Correctly assigns priorities and makes sound engineering judgements. Provides appropriate advice to external stakeholders and seeks advice when required.","Practitioner: Has satisfactorily engaged, reported and communicated authoritatively with the full range of internal/external stakeholders on Air Safety Matters.\n\nExpert: Has extensive expertise in engaging, reporting and communicating authoritatively with internal/external stakeholders on Air Safety Matters.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.4(1)","Staff and Organizational Competence","Ensures effective organizational arrangements are in place for the delivery of Air Safety and for the assignment of responsibilities to subordinates.","Practitioner: Has promoted awareness of essential Air Safety information, including making a check of understanding and taking corrective actions.\n\nExpert: Develops and implements strategies for promoting Air Safety awareness within an organization.  Responds appropriately where difficulty is encountered so that the underlying issues are overcome.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.4(2)","Staff and Organizational Competence","Ensures effective organizational arrangements are in place for the delivery of Air Safety and for the assignment of responsibilities to subordinates.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding of the arrangements to allocate staff to Airworthiness and safety roles, having applied competency standards and assessment scheme to ensure that staff are SQEP to perform their Air Safety activities and hold a Letter of Airworthiness Authority/Letter of Appointment.  \n\nExpert: Has extensive experience of implementing systematic arrangements to allocate staff to Airworthiness and safety roles, having applied competency standards and assessment scheme to ensure that staff are SQEP to perform their Air Safety activities, hold a Letter of Airworthiness Authority/Letter of Appointment and monitoring the efficacy of those decisions. ",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.4(3)","Staff and Organizational Competence","Ensures effective organizational arrangements are in place for the delivery of Air Safety and for the assignment of responsibilities to subordinates.","Practitioner: Has been actively involved in a project addressing the needs of Air Safety and Airworthiness, specifically the assignment of responsibilities and the allocation of resource.\n\nExpert: Has extensive and diverse experience of establishing effective projects to meet the needs of Air Safety and Airworthiness.  This includes assessing, establishing and allocating the appropriate levels of resource.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.4(4)","Staff and Organizational Competence","Ensures effective organizational arrangements are in place for the delivery of Air Safety and for the assignment of responsibilities to subordinates.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding of the means by which Design, Maintenance, Contractor Flying, and Air Traffic Management Equipment organizations achieve MAA approval and can demonstrate the ability to work with the MAA and organization to ensure success. \nHas satisfactorily managed the on-going assurance of MAA approved organizations and worked with the MAA and the organization to help address changes in scope of the approval.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience of the means by which Design, Maintenance, Contractor Flying, and Air Traffic Management Equipment organizations achieve MAA approval and can demonstrate the ability to work with the MAA and organization to ensure success.\nHas extensive experience managing on-going assurance of MAA approved organizations, changes in scope and when circumstances require an alternative approach to be taken such as needing to develop a mechanism to assure the competency of organizations undertaking activities for which no MAA approval scheme exists, or which is beyond the scope of the approval schemes (eg. AAMC/Waiver/Exemption).",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.4(5)","Staff and Organizational Competence","Ensures effective organizational arrangements are in place for the delivery of Air Safety and for the assignment of responsibilities to subordinates.","Practitioner: Has made changes to existing procedures and contributed to new procedures and their implementation necessary for the achievement of Air Safety. \n\nExpert: Develops and implements appropriate procedures, which conform to applicable policy, regulations and laws on aviation safety and which when followed achieve the organizational requirements for aviation safety.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.5(1)","Air Safety Assurance","Assures the satisfactory delivery of information, products and processes used to deliver Air Safety so that they achieve compliance with key mandates and achievement of required safety outcomes.","Practitioner: Has contributed to the development of the Project Safety Management Plan for an Air System.\nHas satisfactorily collected, collated and assessed Air Safety and Airworthiness assurance information as detailed in a Project Safety Management Plan. Has proposed improvements to address the root cause of non-compliance when deemed necessary.\n\nExpert: Develops and implements  effective arrangements in the Project Safety Management Plan for the collection, collation and assessment of Air Safety and Airworthiness assurance information from all relevant parties, both internal and external, to initiate improvements to address the root cause of non-compliance when deemed necessary through negotiating and influencing.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.5(2)","Air Safety Assurance","Assures the satisfactory delivery of information, products and processes used to deliver Air Safety so that they achieve compliance with key mandates and achievement of required safety outcomes.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding to explain the advantages and disadvantages and illustrate with examples, the different mechanisms (eg. audits, approval schemes) for monitoring compliance with the airworthiness safety management system.\n\nExpert: Can cite examples (real or hypothetical) where a lack of adequate monitoring has led, or could lead to, a potentially unsafe situation, and can explain how monitoring within the MOD has been applied to counter such examples (eg. audits, approval schemes). Can develop and implement strategies for the resolution of issues found.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.5(3)","Air Safety Assurance","Assures the satisfactory delivery of information, products and processes used to deliver Air Safety so that they achieve compliance with key mandates and achievement of required safety outcomes.","Practitioner: . Has critically reviewed one or more audits to determine whether they have demonstrated satisfactory compliance with planned arrangements.\n\nExpert:  .Is able to apply a strategic level of knowledge and understanding of the root causes of non-compliance with the airworthiness safety management system and identify trends in compliance.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.5(4)","Air Safety Assurance","Assures the satisfactory delivery of information, products and processes used to deliver Air Safety so that they achieve compliance with key mandates and achievement of required safety outcomes.","Practitioner: Has instigated corrective action, to ensure satisfactory compliance with the airworthiness safety management system, through negotiating and influencing.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience of instigating corrective action at all levels, to ensure satisfactory compliance with the airworthiness safety management system, through negotiating and influencing.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.5(5)","Air Safety Assurance","Assures the satisfactory delivery of information, products and processes used to deliver Air Safety so that they achieve compliance with key mandates and achievement of required safety outcomes.","Practitioner: Has applied appropriate methods used to monitor compliance of projects, including output from MAA approved Organization, with Air Safety policies, regulations, laws and the Project Safety Management System.\n\nExpert: Develops and implements the strategy to, continually review and monitor the effectiveness of methods of assuring compliance of projects with Air Safety regulations, policies, laws, and the Project Safety Management Plan.  ",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.5(6)","Air Safety Assurance","Assures the satisfactory delivery of information, products and processes used to deliver Air Safety so that they achieve compliance with key mandates and achievement of required safety outcomes.","Practitioner: Has gathered safety assurance information and presented an argument to an ADH/AM(MF) (via Significant Engineering Information Note (SEIN) or similar) recommending that an Air System is safe to operate and supporting the ADH/AM(MF)’s sentenced argument that the risk can be  managed ALARP and Tolerable.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience gathering safety assurance information and presenting the arguments to an ADH/AM(MF) (via Significant Engineering Information Note (SEIN) or similar) recommending that an Air System is safe to operate and supporting the ADH/AM(MF)’s sentenced argument that the risks can be managed ALARP and Tolerable.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.5(7)","Air Safety Assurance","Assures the satisfactory delivery of information, products and processes used to deliver Air Safety so that they achieve compliance with key mandates and achievement of required safety outcomes.","Practitioner: Has critically reviewed Airworthiness artefacts to pass comment on their robustness.\n\nExpert: Has extensive expertise in reviewing Air Safety artefacts critically, passing comment on their robustness and acting as the responsible owner for approval and delivery.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.5(8)","Air Safety Assurance","Assures the satisfactory delivery of information, products and processes used to deliver Air Safety so that they achieve compliance with key mandates and achievement of required safety outcomes.","Practitioner: Has sought independent advice and ensured that any safety issues raised were resolved and applied such advice in the achievement of safety outcomes.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience in seeking independent advice, has ensured that safety issues raised are resolved, applied such advice in the achievement of safety outcomes and fully understands the process for challenging and/or rejecting independent advice.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.5(9)","Air Safety Assurance","Assures the satisfactory delivery of information, products and processes used to deliver Air Safety so that they achieve compliance with key mandates and achievement of required safety outcomes.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding to determine if an Air System meets the prerequisites for military registration and apply to the MAA for registration.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience determining if an Air System meets the prerequisites for military registration and complete the application for registration. Has an understanding of the differences in registering Air Systems operated outside of MOD interest, in development and those requiring civil oversight.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.5(10)","Air Safety Assurance","Assures the satisfactory delivery of information, products and processes used to deliver Air Safety so that they achieve compliance with key mandates and achievement of required safety outcomes.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding to undertake assurance of the Air Safety arrangements for CAA oversight of Military Registered Air Systems.\n\nExpert: Has direct first-hand experience of undertaking assurance of the Air Safety arrangements for CAA oversight of Military Registered Air Systems.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.6(1)","Process Delivery","Has an understanding of the context in which applicable Air Safety activities are performed and the ability to deliver satisfactory outcomes.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding to plan the development of Air Safety procedures to suit the regulatory, policy, organizational and programmatic context in which they are performed.\n\nExpert: Applies strategic direction to the establishment of Air Safety procedures to suit the regulatory, policy, organizational and programmatic context in which they are performed. Critically analyses the compliance and seeks appropriate authorisation where compliance is deficient.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.6(2)","Process Delivery","Has an understanding of the context in which applicable Air Safety activities are performed and the ability to deliver satisfactory outcomes.","Practitioner: Has contributed to the development/improvement of established Air Safety procedures.\n\nExpert: Provides direction and authoritative guidance, including across multiple platforms/projects, producing many project-specific Air Safety procedures, which have been shown to be appropriate.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.6(3)","Process Delivery","Has an understanding of the context in which applicable Air Safety activities are performed and the ability to deliver satisfactory outcomes.","Practitioner: Has followed the methods for gathering, compiling and interpreting Airworthiness data relevant to applicable Air Safety procedures\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience of planning the execution and steering successful delivery of multiple methods for gathering, compiling and interpreting Airworthiness data relevant to applicable Air Safety procedures. Has the extensive experience to challenge compliance and deals with resolution where data is insufficient",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.7(1)","External Support","Makes appropriate arrangements for the delivery of Air Safety support by external organizations, including ensuring regulations are contracted appropriately, identifying competence of organizations and identifying the need for technical disciplines that are deficient within the organization.","Practitioner: Is appropriately proactive in prioritising and managing the involvement of external agencies in the provision of Airworthiness and Safety related contracts. \n\nExpert: Has extensive experience of managing the involvement of external agencies in the provision of Airworthiness and Safety related contracts. Scrutinises the outputs from such providers, directs appropriate courses of action in determining need and requirements for external support",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.7(2)","External Support","Makes appropriate arrangements for the delivery of Air Safety support by external organizations, including ensuring regulations are contracted appropriately, identifying competence of organizations and identifying the need for technical disciplines that are deficient within the organization.","Practitioner: Has specified a complete and unambiguous set of safety requirements for an Airworthiness or Safety related support contract within an ITT and/or SOR or managed a change to requirements, such that safety is not compromised.  \n\nExpert: Has extensive experience of  ensuring that a complete and unambiguous set of safety requirements have been incorporated in an ITT and/or SOR or resolved issues relating to contracts to improve airworthiness, for several Airworthiness or Safety related external support contracts, such that safety is not compromised.  ",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.7(3)","External Support","Makes appropriate arrangements for the delivery of Air Safety support by external organizations, including ensuring regulations are contracted appropriately, identifying competence of organizations and identifying the need for technical disciplines that are deficient within the organization.","Practitioner: Has satisfactorily performed a desk-based assessment of a response to an ITT using a systematic approach, which accurately determined the degree of conformance to an ITT.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience of performing and documenting the results of a response to ITT, drawn conclusions and made recommendations, which were recognised as valid.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.7(4)","External Support","Makes appropriate arrangements for the delivery of Air Safety support by external organizations, including ensuring regulations are contracted appropriately, identifying competence of organizations and identifying the need for technical disciplines that are deficient within the organization.","Practitioner: Has satisfactorily generated a supplier assessment plan, which if followed successfully would accurately determine the degree of conformance to an ITT.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience of generating and leading supplier assessments, systematically using audits and reviews, to accurately determine the degree of conformance to an ITT.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.7(5)","External Support","Makes appropriate arrangements for the delivery of Air Safety support by external organizations, including ensuring regulations are contracted appropriately, identifying competence of organizations and identifying the need for technical disciplines that are deficient within the organization.","Practitioner: Has satisfactorily managed the provision of independent technical advice, independent safety auditing and an Airworthiness related external support contract, raising any safety issues for resolution. \n\nExpert: Has extensive experience in ensuring the selection, appointment and management of competent safety panel, including appropriate use of Independent Safety Audit and Independent Technical Evaluation and ensuring that any legitimate safety concerns were resolved.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.8(1)","Failure Modes & Effects","Has knowledge and understanding of the key failure modes associated with the applicable aerospace technical disciplines, and their effect on Airworthiness.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding of key failure modes and mitigations associated with the applicable aerospace technical disciplines and their effect on Airworthiness.\n\nExpert: Has extensive knowledge and understanding of key failure modes and mitigations in a range of aerospace technical disciplines and their effect on Airworthiness.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.8(2)","Failure Modes & Effects","Has knowledge and understanding of the key failure modes associated with the applicable aerospace technical disciplines, and their effect on Airworthiness.","Practitioner: Can provide evidence of what they have done to successfully mitigate risks associated with different types of aerospace technical failures, including mitigations and engagement with the ADH/AM(MF).\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience of successfully mitigating risks associated with different types of aerospace technical failures, including mitigations and engagement with the ADH/AM(MF).",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS1.8(3)","Failure Modes & Effects","Has knowledge and understanding of the key failure modes associated with the applicable aerospace technical disciplines, and their effect on Airworthiness.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate that they have completed trend analysis on aerospace technical failure modes in order to understand their effects on Airworthiness.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience of completing trend analysis on aerospace technical failure modes and can provide advice and guidance on their effects on Airworthiness as a recognised subject matter expert.",null,null,"P"]
[null,null,"Additional Relavent Competency","Any additional information you may wish to include to support your self-assessment within the context of this Function"]

{"sheet":"ACS2 - TAw","index":3,"n_rows":32,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":32,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[4,0,31,0],[1,1,3,1],[1,2,3,2],[0,8,0,10],[1,10,3,10],[0,4,3,4],[0,5,3,5],[0,6,3,6],[1,8,3,8],[0,1,0,3],[1,3,3,3],[1,9,3,9],[0,7,3,7]]}
[null,{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$B$1","v":"MAA_ACS_Assessment_Tool_Iss_2.2"},null,null,"SQEP Criteria",null,"Evidence Available","Minimum SQEP Level",{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$C$6","v":0}]
[null,"Current Competences","SQEP Requirement","Outcome",null,null,null,null,"Applicant Score","Assessor Score","Assessor Comments"]
[]
[]
["ACS2 - Type Airworthiness","ACS2.1(1)","Type Certification","Satisfactorily delivers Type Certification activities","Practitioner: Has a good working knowledge of the Military Air System Certification Process (MACP) and has actively applied it in the delivery of their duties.\n\nExpert:  Has extensive experience of the Military Air System Certification Process (MACP) as a recognised subject matter expert.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.1(2)","Type Certification","Satisfactorily delivers Type Certification activities","Practitioner: Has good working knowledge of Def Stan 00-970 and the utility of other alternative Primary Certification Specifications (eg. US Standards) that could be applied on a project.\n\nExpert: Is able to exercise independent judgement in applying Def Stan 00-970 and other alternative Primary Certification Specifications (eg. US Standards) that could be applied on a project.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.1(3)","Type Certification","Satisfactorily delivers Type Certification activities","Practitioner: Is able to develop a robust Type Certification Basis (TCB), consisting of applicable Airworthiness Requirements, Military Certification Review Items (MCRIs), amendments and deviations.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience of developing a complete Type Certification Basis (TCB), consisting of applicable Airworthiness Requirements, Military Certification Review Items (MCRIs), amendments and deviations.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.1(4)","Type Certification","Satisfactorily delivers Type Certification activities","Practitioner: Is able to develop cogent arguments showing compliance with the TCB and understand how non-compliances are managed.  Is able to advise on Means of Compliance (MC) required to show compliance with the Type Certification Basis (TCB) and satisfactorily monitor their delivery. \n\nExpert: Has sufficient previous experience of applying the MACP and knowledge of the expected level of evidence to review and where appropriate, approve, TCB compliance evidence and managing any non-compliance.  Has deep understanding of the Means of Compliance (MC) to show compliance with the Type Certification Basis (TCB).  ",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.1(5)","Type Certification","Satisfactorily delivers Type Certification activities","Practitioner: Can demonstrate good understanding and knowledge of Testing & Evaluating aerospace components/systems and can provide evidence of how they have implemented this knowledge within the course of their duties (eg. previous experience of activities iaw an Integrated Test Evaluation & Acceptance Criteria or Integrated Test Evaluation & Acceptance Plan, applying software tools to aid the tracking of Test and Evaluation requirements (eg. DOORS or employment within a Combined Test Team)).\n\nExpert: Has deep understanding in both breadth and depth of the Testing & Evaluating of aerospace components/systems/test equipment and can provide evidence of how they have used this knowledge within the course of their duties (eg. formulating an ITEAP, leading a Combined Test Team or been lead assessor for an aircraft type/system/component/test equipment).",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.1(6)","Type Certification","Satisfactorily delivers Type Certification activities","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a good knowledge and understanding of the lifecycle used for the specification, design (including design reviews), procurement, acceptance, etc, of Air Systems, sufficient to decide how and when decisions affecting Airworthiness are best influenced.\n\nExpert: Has a deep understanding of the lifecycle used for the specification, design (including design reviews), procurement, acceptance, etc, of Air Systems, sufficient to decide how and when decisions affecting Airworthiness are best influenced.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.1(7)","Type Certification","Satisfactorily delivers Type Certification activities","Practitioner:.Can demonstrate a good working knowledge and understanding of what constitutes an appropriate maintenance policy for the DAE.\n\nExpert: Has extensive working knowledge of developing appropriate maintenance policies for the DAE.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.1(8)","Type Certification","Satisfactorily delivers Type Certification activities","Practitioner: Has articulated the requirements for maintenance, such that the requirements have been properly understood and addressed in a new design.\n\nExpert: Leads engagement with the Design Organization on the requirements for maintenance, such that the maintenance requirements have been properly addressed in a new design.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.1(9)","Type Certification","Satisfactorily delivers Type Certification activities","Practitioner: Is able to apply understanding of project lifecycles, design engineering, verification and validation sufficient to produce a Certification Programme which includes all necessary activities and responsibilities.\n\nExpert: Has demonstrated a good understanding of project lifecycles, design engineering, verification and validation sufficient to produce a comprehensive Certification Programme which includes all necessary activities and responsibilities.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.1(10)","Type Certification","Satisfactorily delivers Type Certification activities","Practitioner: Is able to develop a Type Certification Exposition for a design change.\n\nExpert:  Has extensive experience of approving Type Certification Expositions across a range of design changes across the lifecycle.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.2(1)","Integrity Management","Satisfactorily delivers integrity management activities.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate good understanding and knowledge of Structural Integrity, Propulsion Integrity and/or Systems Integrity within the aerospace environment. Has applied the principles of ESVRE, including, for example, the validation of design assumptions about usage rates, failure modes and failure rates, Ageing Aircraft Audits, OSD Extension Programmes and Life Extension Programmes.  \n\nExpert: Has deep understanding in both breadth and depth of the processes to achieve Structural Integrity, Propulsion Integrity and/or Systems Integrity. Has applied the principles of ESVRE and has formulated and applied new approaches, including, for example, the validation of design assumptions about usage rates, failure modes and failure rates, Ageing Aircraft Audits, OSD Extension Programmes and Life Extension Programmes.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.2(2)","Integrity Management","Satisfactorily delivers integrity management activities.","Practitioner: Has a practical understanding/knowledge of equipment for health monitoring and diagnosis and the interpretation of data produced by these systems.\n\nExpert: Has deep understanding/knowledge for health monitoring/diagnosis and the interpretation of data produced by these systems.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.3(1)","Air System Document Set","Satisfactorily delivers the Type Airworthiness contribution to the Air System Document Set (ADS).","Practitioner: Is able to develop, review and recommend approval of a Support Policy Statement.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience developing, reviewing and approving Support Policy Statements.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.3(2)","Air System Document Set","Satisfactorily delivers the Type Airworthiness contribution to the Air System Document Set (ADS).","Practitioner: Is able to develop, review and obtain approval of ADS documents which are coherent with the ADS management plan and other relevant processes. Achieves continuing alignment between the ADS, Type Design Changes and the Type Airworthiness Safety Assessment.  Has identified and implemented improvements in the processes for handling the ADS, as required.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience developing, reviewing and obtaining approval of ADS documents which are coherent with the ADS management plan and other relevant processes. Achieves continuing alignment between the ADS, Type Design Changes and the Type Airworthiness Safety Assessment.  Has identified and implemented improvements in the processes for handling the ADS, as required.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.3(3)","Air System Document Set","Satisfactorily delivers the Type Airworthiness contribution to the Air System Document Set (ADS).","Practitioner: Is able to review ADS content for accuracy and completeness, ensuring issues of safety have been properly addressed in ADS releases.  Can provide multiple examples of personally having reviewed a document, taking account of the available supporting evidence, identifying areas of concern, taking appropriate action to address issues and recommending for incorporation and release.\n\nExpert: Has been consulted and provides advice on how the review and approval of ADS documents should be undertaken, ensuring issues of safety have been properly addressed in ADS releases. Has extensive experience of personally reviewing documents, taking account of the available supporting evidence, identifying areas of concern, taking appropriate action to address issues and approving incorporation and release (eg. has managed the review of a complete ADS package (eg. MPTF or RTSR)).",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.3(4)","Air System Document Set","Satisfactorily delivers the Type Airworthiness contribution to the Air System Document Set (ADS).","Practitioner: Is able to assess the risk to life for a deviation from ADS-defined operating and maintenance safety requirements.\n\nExpert: Establishes appropriate arrangements for assessing and, where appropriate, acting upon requests to deviate from operating and maintenance safety requirements defined in the ADS. Accurately assesses the equipment contribution to risk to life associated with such deviations.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.3(5)","Air System Document Set","Satisfactorily delivers the Type Airworthiness contribution to the Air System Document Set (ADS).","Practitioner: Has managed arrangements under the ADS Management Plan and arrangements for placing the ADS under appropriate document management arrangements, including version control, storage and retrieval, distribution, handling of amendments/Special Instructions (Technical), issue control and archiving.  Has experience resolving problems with the management of ADS documentation.\n\nExpert: Establishes the ADS Management Plan and arrangements for placing the ADS under appropriate document management arrangements, including version control, storage and retrieval, distribution, handling of amendments/Special Instructions (Technical), issue control and archiving.  Provides authoritative advice on how problems with the management of ADS documentation should be addressed.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.3(6)","Air System Document Set","Satisfactorily delivers the Type Airworthiness contribution to the Air System Document Set (ADS).","Practitioner: Is able to manage the process for the development and upkeep of ADS documentation, for the correction for any agreed deficiencies, and for retaining alignment with changes in other management processes both internal and external to the MOD. Is able to provide advice on improvements that affect the handling of the ADS.\n\nExpert: Has been instrumental in setting up a process for the development and upkeep of ADS documentation, for the correction for any agreed deficiencies, and for retaining alignment with changes in other management processes both internal and external to the MOD. Has advised on improvements to the accountabilities and responsibilities as they affect the handling of the ADS.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.3(7)","Air System Document Set","Satisfactorily delivers the Type Airworthiness contribution to the Air System Document Set (ADS).","Practitioner: Civil Derivatives. Is able to manage the process to ensure that the Air System Type Design complies with all applicable Certification Airworthiness Regulatory requirements, through-life; for Air Systems with civil Type Certificates, this includes appropriate civil mandatory, advisory and deferred instructions (eg Airworthiness Directives (AD) and Service Bulletins (SB)).\n\nExpert: Civil Derivatives. Has extensive experience ensuring that the Air System Type Design complies with all applicable Certification Airworthiness Regulatory requirements, through-life; for Air Systems with civil Type Certificates, this includes appropriate civil mandatory, advisory and deferred instructions (eg Airworthiness Directives (AD) and Service Bulletins (SB)).",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.4(1)","Production Quality Assurance","Satisfactorily assures production of aircraft, parts and materiel.","Practitioner: Manages the oversight of the Production Organization's QMS within their area of responsibility, including arrangements for:\n- Appropriate collaboration between the DO and PO.\n- First Article Inspection.\n- Readiness to commence production.\n- Arrangements for assuring conformity of parts to the design.\n- Acceptance of production deviations.\n- Certifying parts as airworthy.\n- Retention of production records.\n- Configuration Audit.\n\nExpert: Has established and implemented policies and procedures to ensure the Production Organization's QMS, including arrangements for:\n- Appropriate collaboration between the DO and PO.\n- First article Inspection.\n- Readiness to commence production.\n- Arrangements for assuring conformity of parts to the design.\n- Acceptance of production deviations.\n- Certifying parts as airworthy.\n- Retention of production records.\n- Configuration Audit.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.4(2)","Production Quality Assurance","Satisfactorily assures production of aircraft, parts and materiel.","Practitioner: Has managed the support processes for accepting newly manufactured products, parts and appliances, ensuring the correct identification, for conducting surveys prior to acceptance and for configuration audit activities.\n\nExpert: Has deep understanding in both breadth and depth of the support processes for accepting newly manufactured products, parts and appliances, ensuring the correct identification, for conducting surveys prior to acceptance and for configuration audit activities.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.4(3)","Production Quality Assurance","Satisfactorily assures production of aircraft, parts and materiel.","Practitioner: Is able to manage the support processes for accepting materiel that does not conform to the design.\n\nExpert: Has established and implemented the support processes for accepting materiel that does not conform to the design.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.5(1)","Airworthiness Issue Management","Takes satisfactory responses to Airworthiness issues.","Practitioner: Is able to direct the most appropriate course of action following a failure, malfunction or defect and prepare an appropriate response.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience, approving and releasing the most appropriate course of action following a failure, malfunction or defect.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.6(1)","Design Configuration Management","Satisfactorily delivers design configuration management activities.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a good understanding and knowledge of the importance of an assessment of a design change with regard to Air Safety and can illustrate (with real or hypothetical examples) where a deficiency or change to an Air System has resulted in a reduced safety margin leading to an incident where individuals were harmed.\n\nExpert: Has deep understanding in both breadth and depth of the importance of an assessment of a design change with regard to Air Safety and can illustrate (with real or hypothetical examples) where a deficiency or change to an Air System has resulted in a reduced safety margin leading to an incident where individuals were harmed.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.6(2)","Design Configuration Management","Satisfactorily delivers design configuration management activities.","Practitioner: Has proposed changes to the Type Design (ie modifications and repairs) and the systematic analysis of proposed Air System changes to assess their impact.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience proposing and approving changes to the Type Design (ie modifications and repairs), including the systematic analysis of proposed Air System changes to assess their impact.\nHas been instrumental in instigating improvements in procedures for handling requests to change Air System designs, based on experience gained from their previous application.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.6(3)","Design Configuration Management","Satisfactorily delivers design configuration management activities.","Practitioner: Is able to manage delivery of configuration management activities. Has reviewed a Configuration Management Plan (CMP) against the requirements of Def Stan 05-057 and recommended improvements. \nCan define the “as flown” configuration of an Air System. Manages the processes for the management of changes to an Air System. \nCan conduct a well-judged assessment of modifications and repair schemes for Airworthiness prior to approval.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience in the delivery of configuration management activities.\nIs capable of establishing and implementing a Configuration Management Plan (CMP) against the requirements of Def Stan 05-057, and reviewing and accepting a Design Organization CMP so that they achieve satisfactory levels of control over all design changed, including repairs and modifications to an Air System.\nHas extensive experience of assessing and approving modifications and repair schemes for Airworthiness.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS2.6(4)","Design Configuration Management","Satisfactorily delivers design configuration management activities.","Practitioner: Is able to chair a Configuration Control Board (CCB) for the control of changes to an Air System.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience chairing Configuration Control Boards (CCB) for the control of changes to an Air System.",null,null,"P"]
[null,null,"Additional Relavent Competency","Any additional information you may wish to include to support your self-assessment within the context of this Function"]

{"sheet":"ACS3 - CAw","index":4,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[4,0,11,0],[1,9,3,9],[0,8,0,10],[1,1,3,1],[1,2,3,2],[1,10,3,10],[0,4,3,4],[0,5,3,5],[0,6,3,6],[0,7,3,7],[1,8,3,8],[0,1,0,3],[1,3,3,3]]}
[null,{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$B$1","v":"MAA_ACS_Assessment_Tool_Iss_2.2"},null,null,"SQEP Criteria",null,"Evidence Available","Minimum SQEP Level",{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$C$6","v":0}]
[null,"Current Competences","SQEP Requirement","Outcome",null,null,null,null,"Applicant Score","Assessor Score","Assessor Comments"]
[]
[]
["ACS3 Continuing Airworthiness (CAw) Support","ACS3.1(1)","Continuing Airworthiness Support","Provides satisfactory support to the Aviation Duty Holder/AM(MF)//MilCAM.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate good understanding of the need to support the Aviation Duty Holder/AM(MF) in their accountable role for the safe operation, Continuing Airworthiness and Maintenance of Air Systems.\n\nExpert: Has extensive experience of supporting the Aviation Duty Holder/AM(MF) in their accountable role for the safe operation, Continuing Airworthiness and Maintenance of Air Systems.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS3.1(2)","Continuing Airworthiness Support","Provides satisfactory support to the Aviation Duty Holder/AM(MF)//MilCAM.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate good understanding and knowledge of the Maintenance Organization, Continuing Airworthiness Management Organization and the applicable approval schemes.\n\nExpert: Has extensive understanding and knowledge of the Maintenance Organization, Continuing Airworthiness Management Organization and the applicable approval schemes.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS3.1(3)","Continuing Airworthiness Support","Provides satisfactory support to the Aviation Duty Holder/AM(MF)//MilCAM.","Practitioner: Has generated effective advice on issues of Airworthiness has been provided personally for ‘as maintained’ requirements.\n\nExpert: Is generally recognised as a source of sound advice on issues of Airworthiness ‘as maintained’ requirements.  Has established an effective system for providing advice on ‘as maintained’ requirement.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS3.1(4)","Continuing Airworthiness Support","Provides satisfactory support to the Aviation Duty Holder/AM(MF)//MilCAM.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate good understanding and knowledge of supporting the Continuing Airworthiness and maintenance of Air Systems, particularly with practical application of supporting the provision of all relevant technical information. \n\nExpert: Has deep understanding in both breadth and depth of supporting the Continuing Airworthiness and maintenance of Air Systems, particularly the provision of all relevant technical information. ",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS3.1(5)","Continuing Airworthiness Support","Provides satisfactory support to the Aviation Duty Holder/AM(MF)//MilCAM.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate good understanding of the need to ensure that all Continuing Airworthiness risks are captured, communicated and mitigated effectively.\n\nExpert: Has a deep understanding of the need to ensure that all Continuing Airworthiness risks are captured, communicated and mitigated effectively.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS3.1(6)","Continuing Airworthiness Support","Provides satisfactory support to the Aviation Duty Holder/AM(MF)//MilCAM.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a good understanding and has completed all associated training for DT’s responsibilities for Continuing Airworthiness support (if relevant to position).\n\nExpert: Has a deep understanding and has completed all associated training for DT’s responsibilities for Continuing Airworthiness support (if relevant to position).",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS3.1(7)","Continuing Airworthiness Support","Provides satisfactory support to the Aviation Duty Holder/AM(MF)//MilCAM.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a good understanding of the need to support the issuance of the Statement of Acceptance at Baseline Military Airworthiness Review.\n\nExpert: Has a deep understanding of the need to support the issuance of the Statement of Acceptance at Baseline Military Airworthiness Review.",null,null,"P"]
[null,null,"Additional Relavent Competency","Any additional information you may wish to include to support your self-assessment within the context of this Function"]

{"sheet":" ACS4 - Aircraft Systems","index":5,"n_rows":9,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":9,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[4,0,8,0],[0,8,0,10],[1,8,3,8],[1,9,3,9],[1,10,3,10],[1,3,3,3],[0,5,3,5],[0,7,3,7],[1,1,3,1],[1,2,3,2],[0,6,3,6],[0,4,3,4],[0,1,0,3]]}
[null,{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$B$1","v":"MAA_ACS_Assessment_Tool_Iss_2.2"},null,null,"SQEP Criteria",null,"Evidence Available","Minimum SQEP Level",{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$C$6","v":0}]
[null,"Current Competences","SQEP Requirement","Outcome",null,null,null,null,"Applicant Score","Assessor Score","Assessor Comments"]
[]
[]
["ACS4 Aircraft Systems. (Not required for issue of an LOE) ","ACS4.1(1)","Aircraft Systems","Has knowledge and understanding of Aircraft System(s) that when required in their assigned role ensures safe and effective military aircraft operation","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a good understanding and knowledge of the relevant Air System.\n\nExpert: Can demonstrate a deep understanding in both breadth and depth of the relevant Air System.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS4.1(2)","Aircraft Systems","Has knowledge and understanding of Aircraft System(s) that when required in their assigned role ensures safe and effective military aircraft operation","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a good understanding and knowledge of specifying, designing, testing or maintaining Aircraft System(s), including environmental, operational, physical influences, the UK design and regulatory framework and the downstream implications on maintenance, operational limitations and ADS.\n\nExpert: Has a deep understanding in both breadth and depth of specifying, designing, testing or maintaining Aircraft System(s), including environmental, operational, physical influences, the UK design and regulatory framework and the downstream implications on maintenance, operational limitations and ADS.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS4.1(3)","Aircraft Systems","Has knowledge and understanding of Aircraft System(s) that when required in their assigned role ensures safe and effective military aircraft operation","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a good understanding and knowledge of the different Aircraft System(s) architectures and technologies available.\n\nExpert: Has a deep understanding in both breadth and depth of the different Aircraft System(s) architectures and technologies available.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS4.1(4)","Aircraft Systems","Has knowledge and understanding of Aircraft System(s) that when required in their assigned role ensures safe and effective military aircraft operation","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a good understanding and knowledge of how Equipment Not Basic to the Air System (ENBAS)/weapons may influence Aircraft System(s).\n\nExpert: Has a deep understanding in both breadth and depth how Equipment Not Basic to the Air System (ENBAS)/weapons may influence Aircraft System(s).",null,null,"P"]
[null,null,"Additional Relavent Competency","Any additional information you may wish to include to support your self-assessment within the context of this Function"]

{"sheet":"ACS5 - Air SM","index":6,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[4,0,11,0],[0,4,3,4],[0,5,3,5],[0,6,3,6],[1,1,3,1],[1,2,3,2],[0,1,0,3],[1,3,3,3],[1,9,3,9],[0,7,3,7],[1,8,3,8],[0,8,0,10],[1,10,3,10]]}
[null,{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$B$1","v":"MAA_ACS_Assessment_Tool_Iss_2.2"},null,null,"SQEP Criteria",null,"Evidence Available","Minimum SQEP Level",{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$C$6","v":0}]
[null,"Current Competences","SQEP Requirement","Outcome",null,null,null,null,"Applicant Score","Assessor Score","Assessor Comments"]
[]
[]
["ACS5 Air Safety Management","ACS5.1(1)","Air Safety Management Techniques","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of specialist safety management requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Has been actively involved in the establishment, development and/or upkeep of an Airworthiness strategy.\n\nExpert: Has developed, endorsed and gained OCD approval of an Airworthiness strategy for at least one Air System.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS5.1(2)","Air Safety Management Techniques","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of specialist safety management requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate a good knowledge and understanding of the Air Safety Management System by consistently providing correct advice on its interpretation. Has successfully developed and implemented parts of an Air Safety Management System.\n\nExpert: Has successfully developed and implemented at least one Air Safety Management System and/or made significant contributions to parts of multiple Air Safety Management Systems.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS5.1(3)","Air Safety Management Techniques","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of specialist safety management requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Has contributed to the management of the Type Airworthiness Safety Assessment (TASA) including contributing to the development/update, supporting the contribution it makes to the Air System Safety Case (ASSC) and having had the ADH/AM(MF) sentencing the residual risks ALARP and Tolerable. \n\nExpert: Has extensive expertise in managing the development, acceptance and update (eg. Initial issue, update for minor/major change) of the Type Airworthiness Safety Assessments (TASA), supporting the contribution it makes to the Air System Safety Case (ASSC) and having had the ADH/AM(MF) sentencing the residual risks ALARP and Tolerable .",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS5.1(4)","Air Safety Management Techniques","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of specialist safety management requirements and techniques.","Practitioner:  Can demonstrate good understanding and knowledge of threats and the equipment contribution to hazards, sufficient to produce a concise but comprehensive threat log, including developing well-reasoned hazard analysis and resolution of issues. Has been responsible for the maintenance of at least one Air System Threat log, including communicating the outputs to the Air System Safety Case (ASSC) to enable the ADH/AM(MF) to sentence the residual risks ALARP and Tolerable. \n\nExpert: Has a deep understanding in both breadth and depth of threats and the equipment contribution to hazards, sufficient to produce a concise but comprehensive threat log, including developing complete and accurate hazard analysis and resolution of issues. Has been responsible for the development and upkeep of an Air System threat log on one major or several minor projects, including communicating the outputs to the Air System Safety Case (ASSC) to enable the ADH/AM(MF) to sentence the residual risks ALARP and Tolerable. ",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS5.1(5)","Air Safety Management Techniques","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of specialist safety management requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate good understanding and knowledge of how Air Systems are designed to acceptable Design Safety Targets, including contributing to the upkeep of such evidence for one Air System.\n\nExpert: Has a deep understanding in both breadth and depth of how Air Systems are designed to acceptable Design Safety Targets, including contributing to the upkeep of such evidence for several Air Systems with knowledge of the different approaches (eg. UK25.1309, Foreign Military Sales).",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS5.1(6)","Air Safety Management Techniques","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of specialist safety management requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate good understanding and knowledge of how Air System Software/Complex Electronic Hardware are designed to acceptable Design Targets in the form of Design Assurance Levels, including contributing to the development of such evidence for one Air System.\n\nExpert: Has a deep understanding in both breadth and depth of how Air Systems Software/Complex Electronic Hardware are designed to acceptable Design Targets in the form of Design Assurance Levels, including contributing to the upkeep of such evidence for several Air Systems with knowledge of the different approaches (eg. Adapting available evidence from civil/Foreign Military Sale clearances).",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS5.1(7)","Air Safety Management Techniques","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of specialist safety management requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Can demonstrate good understanding and knowledge of specialist techniques and methodologies, having applied them during the conduct of applicable Air Safety procedures (eg Loss Models, GSNs, Bowties etc).\n\nExpert: Has a deep understanding in both breadth and depth of specialist techniques and methodologies, having applied them during the conduct of applicable Air Safety procedures (eg Loss Models, GSNs, Bowties etc).",null,null,"P"]
[null,null,"Additional Relavent Competency","Any additional information you may wish to include to support your self-assessment within the context of this Function"]

{"sheet":"ACS6 - RTS-MPTF","index":7,"n_rows":13,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":13,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[4,0,12,0],[1,9,3,9],[1,10,3,10],[0,1,0,3],[0,4,3,4],[0,5,3,5],[0,6,3,6],[0,7,3,7],[0,8,0,10],[1,1,3,1],[1,2,3,2],[1,3,3,3],[1,8,3,8]]}
[null,{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$B$1","v":"MAA_ACS_Assessment_Tool_Iss_2.2"},null,null,"SQEP Criteria",null,"Evidence Available","Minimum SQEP Level",{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$C$6","v":0}]
[null,"Current Competences","SQEP Requirement","Outcome",null,null,null,null,"Applicant Score","Assessor Score","Assessor Comments"]
[]
[]
["ACS6 Release To Service and Military Permit to Fly Management","ACS6.1(1)","Release To Service and Military Permit to Fly Management","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of Release To Service (RTS)/Military Permit to Fly (MPTF) Recommendations, requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Has contributed to the generation, submission and acceptance of RTS or MPTF (In-Service) Recommendations for a Major Change.\n\nExpert: Has successfully generated, submitted via OCD, and had accepted a RTS or MPTF (In-Service) Recommendations for a new Air System and/or Air System mark change.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS6.1(2)","Release To Service and Military Permit to Fly Management","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of Release To Service (RTS)/Military Permit to Fly (MPTF) Recommendations, requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Has contributed to the generation, submission and acceptance of RTS or MPTF (In-Service) Special Clearances.\n\nExpert: Has successfully generated, submitted and had accepted a RTS or MPTF (In-Service) Special Clearance.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS6.1(3)","Release To Service and Military Permit to Fly Management","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of Release To Service (RTS)/Military Permit to Fly (MPTF) Recommendations, requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Has contributed to the generation, submission and acceptance of RTS or MPTF (In-Service) clearances for ENBAS.\n\nExpert: Has successfully generated, submitted and had accepted a RTS or MPTF (In-Service) clearances for ENBAS.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS6.1(4)","Release To Service and Military Permit to Fly Management","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of Release To Service (RTS)/Military Permit to Fly (MPTF) Recommendations, requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Has contributed to the generation, submission and acceptance of RTS or MPTF (In-Service) clearances for Air Launched Weapons (if relevant to position).\n\nExpert: Has successfully generated, submitted and had accepted a RTS or MPTF (In-Service) clearances for Air Launched Weapons (if relevant to position).",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS6.1(5)","Release To Service and Military Permit to Fly Management","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of Release To Service (RTS)/Military Permit to Fly (MPTF) Recommendations, requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Has contributed to the generation, submission and acceptance of RTS or MPTF (In-Service) clearances for PBN / RVSM (if relevant to position).\n\nExpert: Has successfully generated, submitted and had accepted a RTS or MPTF (In-Service) clearances for PBN / RVSM (if relevant to position).",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS6.1(6)","Release To Service and Military Permit to Fly Management","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of Release To Service (RTS)/Military Permit to Fly (MPTF) Recommendations, requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Has contributed to the generation, submission and acceptance of Ship Air-Release clearances for Embarked Aviation in Her Majesty’s / MOD Ships (if relevant to position).\n\nExpert: Has successfully generated, submitted and had accepted a Ship Air-Release clearance for Embarked Aviation in Her Majesty’s / MOD Ships (if relevant to position).",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS6.1(7)","Release To Service and Military Permit to Fly Management","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of Release To Service (RTS)/Military Permit to Fly (MPTF) Recommendations, requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Has contributed to the generation and approval of a MPTF (Development), including ensuring the integrity of the relationship to the RTS and Air System Safety Case.\n\nExpert: Has successfully generated and approved a MPTF (Development), including ensuring the relationship to the RTS and Air System Safety Case.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"ACS6.1(8)","Release To Service and Military Permit to Fly Management","Has sufficient knowledge and understanding of Release To Service (RTS)/Military Permit to Fly (MPTF) Recommendations, requirements and techniques.","Practitioner: Has contributed to the generation and approval of a MPTF (In-Service), (Special Case Flying) or (Single Task) (if relevant to position).\n\nExpert: Has successfully generated and approved a MPTF (In-Service), (Special Case Flying) or (Single Task) (if relevant to position).",null,null,"P"]
[null,null,"Additional Relavent Competency","Any additional information you may wish to include to support your self-assessment within the context of this Function"]

{"sheet":"Additional Req","index":8,"n_rows":7,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":7,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[4,0,6,0],[1,3,3,3],[0,8,0,10],[1,10,3,10],[0,4,3,4],[0,5,3,5],[0,6,3,6],[1,9,3,9],[0,7,3,7],[1,8,3,8],[0,1,0,3],[1,1,3,1],[1,2,3,2]]}
[null,{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$B$1","v":"MAA_ACS_Assessment_Tool_Iss_2.2"},null,null,"SQEP Criteria",null,"Evidence Available","Minimum SQEP Level",{"$f":"'Personal Details'!$C$6","v":0}]
[null,"Current Competences","SQEP Requirement","Outcome",null,null,null,null,"Applicant Score","Assessor Score","Assessor Comments"]
[]
[]
["ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS","Training\nQualification","Aircraft type\nEquipment\nOrganisation specific course","iaw MAA RA 1003","The candidate must have completed the relavent Air System Type Specific Managers course.\n\nWhere Air System Type Specific Managers’ Courses are not available to assist in generating this competence, an appropriate level of technical familiarization should be achieved for each Air System type).",null,null,"P"]
[null,"Training\nQualification","Airworthiness of Military Aircraft","iaw MAA RA 1003","The candidate must be have completed the Airworthiness for Military Aircraft Course at Practitioner (AMAC-P) level within the validity period of 5 years.",null,null,"P"]
[null,"Qualification","Professional Registration","iaw MAA RA 1003","The candidate must be registerred to at least CEng.",null,null,"P"]