Transparency data
NHS Test and Trace regional breakdowns, 28 May 2020 to 23 February 2022: data tables
Updated 31 March 2022
Download CSV 38.3 KB
| Category | Upper tier local authority | Region | Total | Total reached | Percentage reached | Start date | End date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Barking and Dagenham | London | 62,711 | 49,649 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Barnet | London | 109,115 | 89,867 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Barnsley | Yorkshire and The Humber | 78,121 | 64,776 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bath and North East Somerset | South West | 48,310 | 42,762 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bedford | East of England | 53,945 | 44,262 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bexley | London | 70,880 | 60,991 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Birmingham | West Midlands | 310,167 | 253,068 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Blackburn with Darwen | North West | 51,680 | 43,923 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Blackpool | North West | 42,664 | 37,195 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bolton | North West | 85,588 | 74,106 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | South West | 109,428 | 90,798 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bracknell Forest | South East | 34,960 | 29,859 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bradford | Yorkshire and The Humber | 154,622 | 131,598 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Brent | London | 87,994 | 70,560 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Brighton and Hove | South East | 78,339 | 66,562 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bristol, City of | South West | 136,343 | 120,783 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bromley | London | 92,101 | 79,393 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Buckinghamshire | South East | 150,466 | 127,460 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bury | North West | 58,909 | 48,380 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Calderdale | Yorkshire and The Humber | 59,197 | 52,597 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cambridgeshire | East of England | 166,945 | 143,397 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Camden | London | 60,366 | 50,999 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Central Bedfordshire | East of England | 80,563 | 68,011 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cheshire East | North West | 105,738 | 93,987 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cheshire West and Chester | North West | 102,506 | 88,635 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cornwall & Isles of Scilly | South West | 118,316 | 99,590 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | County Durham | North East | 154,687 | 130,108 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Coventry | West Midlands | 97,566 | 79,759 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Croydon | London | 106,993 | 88,200 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cumbria | North West | 130,342 | 114,938 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Darlington | North East | 32,316 | 26,744 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Derby | East Midlands | 73,846 | 63,449 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Derbyshire | East Midlands | 213,223 | 179,935 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Devon | South West | 178,822 | 150,619 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Doncaster | Yorkshire and The Humber | 94,366 | 78,816 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Dorset | South West | 80,761 | 67,670 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Dudley | West Midlands | 96,613 | 83,905 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Ealing | London | 104,794 | 87,764 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | East Riding of Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 87,479 | 73,903 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | East Sussex | South East | 131,882 | 110,066 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Enfield | London | 85,855 | 69,846 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Essex | East of England | 416,572 | 359,370 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Gateshead | North East | 59,813 | 51,985 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Gloucestershire | South West | 150,654 | 128,203 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Greenwich | London | 77,908 | 64,465 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | City of London & Hackney | London | 77,938 | 63,706 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Halton | North West | 42,784 | 36,094 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hammersmith and Fulham | London | 54,920 | 45,225 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hampshire | South East | 349,102 | 314,169 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Haringey | London | 71,582 | 57,762 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Harrow | London | 70,974 | 60,144 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hartlepool | North East | 30,130 | 25,671 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Havering | London | 79,031 | 70,650 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Herefordshire, County of | West Midlands | 41,785 | 36,141 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hertfordshire | East of England | 340,285 | 292,560 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hillingdon | London | 88,235 | 74,249 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hounslow | London | 83,873 | 70,739 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Isle of Wight | South East | 30,805 | 27,718 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Islington | London | 62,478 | 51,414 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kensington and Chelsea | London | 38,649 | 29,310 | 76 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kent | South East | 412,093 | 352,624 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kingston upon Hull, City of | Yorkshire and The Humber | 77,738 | 64,094 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kingston upon Thames | London | 50,169 | 44,968 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kirklees | Yorkshire and The Humber | 121,010 | 101,044 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Knowsley | North West | 52,029 | 45,413 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lambeth | London | 96,688 | 80,754 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lancashire | North West | 364,709 | 314,704 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Leeds | Yorkshire and The Humber | 237,299 | 196,327 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Leicester | East Midlands | 108,753 | 95,436 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Leicestershire | East Midlands | 201,053 | 168,412 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lewisham | London | 82,335 | 67,934 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lincolnshire | East Midlands | 187,279 | 157,692 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Liverpool | North West | 152,142 | 125,227 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Luton | East of England | 67,041 | 60,472 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Manchester | North West | 170,383 | 139,274 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Medway | South East | 79,624 | 70,267 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Merton | London | 61,745 | 51,556 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Middlesbrough | North East | 46,829 | 39,302 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Milton Keynes | South East | 82,988 | 68,763 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 89,049 | 72,865 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Newham | London | 96,396 | 75,558 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Norfolk | East of England | 208,550 | 183,253 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North East Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 45,257 | 38,574 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 44,018 | 38,000 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 100,077 | 84,989 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Somerset | South West | 52,978 | 45,671 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Tyneside | North East | 65,483 | 57,674 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 152,304 | 131,581 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Northumberland | North East | 88,231 | 76,801 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Nottingham | East Midlands | 94,766 | 76,602 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Nottinghamshire | East Midlands | 236,389 | 197,989 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Oldham | North West | 72,183 | 62,185 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Oxfordshire | South East | 181,294 | 165,455 | 91 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Peterborough | East of England | 64,506 | 54,604 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Plymouth | South West | 70,216 | 59,954 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Portsmouth | South East | 57,745 | 49,105 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Reading | South East | 48,132 | 42,314 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Redbridge | London | 90,558 | 73,507 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Redcar and Cleveland | North East | 41,608 | 34,580 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Richmond upon Thames | London | 56,434 | 47,752 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Rochdale | North West | 70,010 | 58,264 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Rotherham | Yorkshire and The Humber | 81,860 | 70,899 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Rutland | East Midlands | 9,537 | 7,828 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Salford | North West | 85,209 | 67,593 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sandwell | West Midlands | 101,019 | 84,833 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sefton | North West | 84,134 | 70,529 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sheffield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 161,675 | 133,252 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Shropshire | West Midlands | 77,184 | 65,879 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Slough | South East | 46,546 | 41,160 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Solihull | West Midlands | 63,172 | 54,903 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Somerset | South West | 126,539 | 109,992 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | South Gloucestershire | South West | 78,821 | 66,808 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | South Tyneside | North East | 47,837 | 39,617 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Southampton | South East | 67,597 | 60,363 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 51,497 | 44,645 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Southwark | London | 86,749 | 70,434 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | St. Helens | North West | 57,520 | 50,040 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Staffordshire | West Midlands | 247,441 | 216,815 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Stockport | North West | 89,433 | 76,595 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Stockton-on-Tees | North East | 62,673 | 54,873 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 75,614 | 63,159 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Suffolk | East of England | 170,019 | 143,102 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sunderland | North East | 84,977 | 77,998 | 92 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Surrey | South East | 338,519 | 296,906 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sutton | London | 62,222 | 57,329 | 92 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Swindon | South West | 60,318 | 53,940 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Tameside | North West | 71,840 | 59,200 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Telford and Wrekin | West Midlands | 53,504 | 46,718 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Thurrock | East of England | 55,232 | 47,408 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Torbay | South West | 34,161 | 29,975 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Tower Hamlets | London | 92,273 | 79,012 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Trafford | North West | 74,168 | 64,001 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Unknown | Unknown | 151,908 | 93,135 | 61 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wakefield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 101,964 | 85,489 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Walsall | West Midlands | 82,763 | 66,243 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Waltham Forest | London | 77,261 | 62,405 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wandsworth | London | 99,784 | 82,686 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Warrington | North West | 66,524 | 56,641 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Warwickshire | West Midlands | 162,141 | 143,952 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | West Berkshire | South East | 38,650 | 34,390 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | West Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 118,472 | 105,763 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | West Sussex | South East | 218,804 | 184,083 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Westminster | London | 57,774 | 47,150 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wigan | North West | 103,379 | 86,503 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wiltshire | South West | 116,515 | 99,501 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Windsor and Maidenhead | South East | 42,703 | 36,361 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wirral | North West | 95,151 | 80,153 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wokingham | South East | 47,812 | 43,358 | 91 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 78,657 | 63,618 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Worcestershire | West Midlands | 152,531 | 133,053 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | York | Yorkshire and The Humber | 52,547 | 47,836 | 91 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Barking and Dagenham | London | 101,432 | 87,212 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Barnet | London | 215,990 | 178,980 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Barnsley | Yorkshire and The Humber | 138,974 | 116,443 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bath and North East Somerset | South West | 107,906 | 88,192 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bedford | East of England | 104,669 | 89,132 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bexley | London | 129,011 | 109,931 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Birmingham | West Midlands | 602,523 | 499,661 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Blackburn with Darwen | North West | 101,122 | 82,668 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Blackpool | North West | 73,709 | 63,243 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bolton | North West | 163,083 | 133,086 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | South West | 210,536 | 173,680 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bracknell Forest | South East | 71,670 | 60,790 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bradford | Yorkshire and The Humber | 326,352 | 261,339 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Brent | London | 155,958 | 129,271 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Brighton and Hove | South East | 152,480 | 122,070 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bristol, City of | South West | 283,884 | 226,823 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bromley | London | 180,772 | 152,347 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Buckinghamshire | South East | 334,435 | 281,515 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bury | North West | 114,387 | 93,306 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Calderdale | Yorkshire and The Humber | 115,642 | 96,383 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cambridgeshire | East of England | 359,699 | 298,989 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Camden | London | 119,685 | 92,575 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Central Bedfordshire | East of England | 164,885 | 140,387 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cheshire East | North West | 227,725 | 189,481 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cheshire West and Chester | North West | 209,108 | 174,170 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cornwall & Isles of Scilly | South West | 253,391 | 209,825 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | County Durham | North East | 292,148 | 239,178 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Coventry | West Midlands | 183,334 | 153,333 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Croydon | London | 188,738 | 157,423 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cumbria | North West | 266,162 | 222,931 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Darlington | North East | 60,336 | 50,701 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Derby | East Midlands | 146,858 | 123,109 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Derbyshire | East Midlands | 417,643 | 350,122 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Devon | South West | 388,781 | 319,372 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Doncaster | Yorkshire and The Humber | 173,531 | 143,793 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Dorset | South West | 174,191 | 145,427 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Dudley | West Midlands | 199,017 | 168,451 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Ealing | London | 200,518 | 164,918 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | East Riding of Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 174,363 | 145,163 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | East Sussex | South East | 258,154 | 218,464 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Enfield | London | 156,173 | 131,626 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Essex | East of England | 847,020 | 715,999 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Gateshead | North East | 116,878 | 97,117 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Gloucestershire | South West | 316,458 | 264,174 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Greenwich | London | 139,934 | 115,596 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | City of London & Hackney | London | 137,015 | 104,513 | 76 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Halton | North West | 81,948 | 69,174 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hammersmith and Fulham | London | 82,081 | 63,875 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hampshire | South East | 779,536 | 654,928 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Haringey | London | 127,403 | 101,835 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Harrow | London | 140,401 | 119,562 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hartlepool | North East | 55,193 | 46,885 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Havering | London | 156,052 | 133,286 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Herefordshire, County of | West Midlands | 85,458 | 72,061 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hertfordshire | East of England | 709,849 | 598,158 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hillingdon | London | 173,688 | 143,749 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hounslow | London | 166,187 | 139,102 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Isle of Wight | South East | 66,597 | 55,893 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Islington | London | 114,321 | 88,203 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kensington and Chelsea | London | 75,186 | 57,612 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kent | South East | 831,096 | 702,346 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kingston upon Hull, City of | Yorkshire and The Humber | 136,856 | 112,167 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kingston upon Thames | London | 107,918 | 89,637 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kirklees | Yorkshire and The Humber | 243,835 | 199,907 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Knowsley | North West | 96,987 | 79,967 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lambeth | London | 165,135 | 128,775 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lancashire | North West | 696,462 | 578,720 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Leeds | Yorkshire and The Humber | 461,794 | 374,389 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Leicester | East Midlands | 224,334 | 188,489 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Leicestershire | East Midlands | 406,762 | 335,499 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lewisham | London | 134,651 | 109,287 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lincolnshire | East Midlands | 368,874 | 307,168 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Liverpool | North West | 264,429 | 212,323 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Luton | East of England | 121,663 | 102,670 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Manchester | North West | 324,444 | 253,008 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Medway | South East | 154,602 | 131,717 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Merton | London | 120,466 | 100,065 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Middlesbrough | North East | 85,199 | 71,875 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Milton Keynes | South East | 165,308 | 140,885 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 171,901 | 137,516 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Newham | London | 170,100 | 139,202 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Norfolk | East of England | 427,087 | 359,143 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North East Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 86,052 | 71,846 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 90,289 | 75,459 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 202,440 | 171,728 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Somerset | South West | 113,140 | 94,569 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Tyneside | North East | 134,373 | 110,275 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 317,523 | 265,634 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Northumberland | North East | 181,869 | 153,041 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Nottingham | East Midlands | 170,670 | 133,761 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Nottinghamshire | East Midlands | 464,791 | 386,197 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Oldham | North West | 139,110 | 111,303 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Oxfordshire | South East | 427,406 | 350,762 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Peterborough | East of England | 126,269 | 106,325 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Plymouth | South West | 138,624 | 114,589 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Portsmouth | South East | 109,949 | 90,627 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Reading | South East | 99,044 | 82,007 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Redbridge | London | 172,734 | 145,848 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Redcar and Cleveland | North East | 74,678 | 62,691 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Richmond upon Thames | London | 125,028 | 102,597 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Rochdale | North West | 135,198 | 110,252 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Rotherham | Yorkshire and The Humber | 145,843 | 122,283 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Rutland | East Midlands | 18,185 | 15,288 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Salford | North West | 147,078 | 117,911 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sandwell | West Midlands | 182,188 | 155,296 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sefton | North West | 150,575 | 125,344 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sheffield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 312,995 | 251,607 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Shropshire | West Midlands | 157,376 | 131,566 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Slough | South East | 98,110 | 83,076 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Solihull | West Midlands | 133,491 | 112,505 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Somerset | South West | 272,818 | 228,372 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | South Gloucestershire | South West | 168,039 | 139,872 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | South Tyneside | North East | 85,711 | 71,644 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Southampton | South East | 133,622 | 110,418 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 97,585 | 82,866 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Southwark | London | 154,486 | 118,939 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | St. Helens | North West | 107,017 | 88,955 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Staffordshire | West Midlands | 513,577 | 432,832 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Stockport | North West | 185,512 | 153,631 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Stockton-on-Tees | North East | 124,616 | 103,249 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 143,677 | 121,073 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Suffolk | East of England | 343,716 | 289,532 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sunderland | North East | 162,578 | 137,144 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Surrey | South East | 764,303 | 639,386 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sutton | London | 122,680 | 103,331 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Swindon | South West | 129,001 | 107,303 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Tameside | North West | 134,583 | 111,147 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Telford and Wrekin | West Midlands | 113,589 | 96,051 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Thurrock | East of England | 102,181 | 88,476 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Torbay | South West | 72,347 | 60,198 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Tower Hamlets | London | 174,937 | 135,960 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Trafford | North West | 159,236 | 131,972 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wakefield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 193,314 | 161,030 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Walsall | West Midlands | 153,099 | 129,407 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Waltham Forest | London | 140,844 | 115,473 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wandsworth | London | 189,943 | 150,468 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Warrington | North West | 130,195 | 108,078 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Warwickshire | West Midlands | 343,646 | 289,253 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | West Berkshire | South East | 90,747 | 75,650 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | West Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 249,084 | 210,451 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | West Sussex | South East | 461,739 | 387,550 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Westminster | London | 123,864 | 94,167 | 76 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wigan | North West | 195,794 | 161,500 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wiltshire | South West | 253,443 | 212,021 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Windsor and Maidenhead | South East | 85,968 | 70,696 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wirral | North West | 184,632 | 154,434 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wokingham | South East | 116,209 | 98,310 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 137,138 | 116,268 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Worcestershire | West Midlands | 310,367 | 262,650 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | York | Yorkshire and The Humber | 105,492 | 83,171 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Unknown | Unknown | 216,053 | 132,052 | 61 | 28/05/2020 | 23/02/2022 |