Transparency data
NHS Test and Trace regional breakdowns, 28 May 2020 to 9 February 2022: data tables
Updated 7 March 2022
Download CSV 38.2 KB
| Category | Upper Tier Local Authority | Region | Total | Total reached | Percentage reached | Start date | End date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Barking and Dagenham | London | 61,841 | 48,739 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Barnet | London | 106,305 | 87,285 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Barnsley | Yorkshire and The Humber | 77,285 | 63,603 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bath and North East Somerset | South West | 46,653 | 41,115 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bedford | East of England | 52,395 | 42,908 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bexley | London | 69,521 | 59,527 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Birmingham | West Midlands | 305,289 | 248,182 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Blackburn with Darwen | North West | 51,095 | 43,406 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Blackpool | North West | 41,812 | 36,426 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bolton | North West | 84,756 | 73,092 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | South West | 105,144 | 86,988 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bracknell Forest | South East | 33,902 | 28,802 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bradford | Yorkshire and The Humber | 152,917 | 129,405 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Brent | London | 87,519 | 68,708 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Brighton and Hove | South East | 75,078 | 63,370 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bristol, City of | South West | 131,599 | 115,880 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bromley | London | 89,506 | 76,844 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Buckinghamshire | South East | 145,805 | 122,884 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bury | North West | 58,102 | 47,627 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Calderdale | Yorkshire and The Humber | 58,354 | 51,674 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cambridgeshire | East of England | 159,160 | 136,725 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Camden | London | 58,224 | 48,964 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Central Bedfordshire | East of England | 78,046 | 65,742 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cheshire East | North West | 102,601 | 91,040 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cheshire West and Chester | North West | 100,103 | 86,230 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cornwall & Isles of Scilly | South West | 113,443 | 95,009 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | County Durham | North East | 152,670 | 127,421 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Coventry | West Midlands | 95,638 | 77,701 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Croydon | London | 104,602 | 85,352 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cumbria | North West | 127,775 | 111,830 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Darlington | North East | 31,916 | 26,145 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Derby | East Midlands | 72,039 | 61,396 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Derbyshire | East Midlands | 207,620 | 174,042 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Devon | South West | 170,629 | 143,050 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Doncaster | Yorkshire and The Humber | 93,193 | 77,562 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Dorset | South West | 77,060 | 64,382 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Dudley | West Midlands | 95,177 | 82,206 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Ealing | London | 102,084 | 85,068 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | East Riding of Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 85,588 | 71,803 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | East Sussex | South East | 126,988 | 104,590 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Enfield | London | 84,090 | 68,178 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Essex | East of England | 406,157 | 348,973 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Gateshead | North East | 59,339 | 50,937 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Gloucestershire | South West | 143,221 | 121,210 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Greenwich | London | 76,085 | 62,764 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | City of London & Hackney | London | 75,764 | 61,667 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Halton | North West | 41,905 | 35,324 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hammersmith and Fulham | London | 53,411 | 43,704 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hampshire | South East | 336,152 | 300,877 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Haringey | London | 70,746 | 56,070 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Harrow | London | 69,111 | 58,354 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hartlepool | North East | 29,852 | 25,273 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Havering | London | 77,591 | 69,125 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Herefordshire, County of | West Midlands | 40,264 | 34,615 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hertfordshire | East of England | 329,344 | 282,777 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hillingdon | London | 86,241 | 72,219 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hounslow | London | 82,141 | 68,830 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Isle of Wight | South East | 29,330 | 26,242 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Islington | London | 60,270 | 49,359 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kensington and Chelsea | London | 37,261 | 28,192 | 76 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kent | South East | 400,271 | 339,528 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kingston upon Hull, City of | Yorkshire and The Humber | 75,880 | 62,318 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kingston upon Thames | London | 48,473 | 43,316 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kirklees | Yorkshire and The Humber | 119,537 | 99,235 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Knowsley | North West | 51,327 | 44,550 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lambeth | London | 94,071 | 78,088 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lancashire | North West | 358,526 | 309,130 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Leeds | Yorkshire and The Humber | 232,712 | 191,801 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Leicester | East Midlands | 107,605 | 93,490 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Leicestershire | East Midlands | 197,005 | 163,505 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lewisham | London | 79,953 | 65,730 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lincolnshire | East Midlands | 181,851 | 152,079 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Liverpool | North West | 149,817 | 122,653 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Luton | East of England | 65,711 | 59,124 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Manchester | North West | 168,267 | 136,813 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Medway | South East | 77,632 | 68,143 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Merton | London | 59,832 | 49,721 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Middlesbrough | North East | 46,322 | 38,591 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Milton Keynes | South East | 80,425 | 66,476 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 87,879 | 71,349 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Newham | London | 94,442 | 73,790 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Norfolk | East of England | 198,472 | 174,314 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North East Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 44,688 | 37,748 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 43,466 | 37,200 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 96,937 | 81,838 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Somerset | South West | 50,676 | 43,543 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Tyneside | North East | 64,790 | 56,246 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 148,454 | 127,212 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Northumberland | North East | 86,828 | 74,816 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Nottingham | East Midlands | 93,345 | 74,475 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Nottinghamshire | East Midlands | 230,933 | 191,797 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Oldham | North West | 71,631 | 61,368 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Oxfordshire | South East | 174,148 | 157,657 | 91 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Peterborough | East of England | 62,432 | 52,892 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Plymouth | South West | 67,398 | 57,279 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Portsmouth | South East | 56,125 | 47,431 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Reading | South East | 46,483 | 40,564 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Redbridge | London | 89,292 | 71,934 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Redcar and Cleveland | North East | 41,556 | 34,110 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Richmond upon Thames | London | 54,360 | 45,810 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Rochdale | North West | 69,140 | 57,487 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Rotherham | Yorkshire and The Humber | 80,591 | 69,590 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Rutland | East Midlands | 9,182 | 7,476 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Salford | North West | 84,191 | 66,422 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sandwell | West Midlands | 99,967 | 83,453 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sefton | North West | 82,530 | 69,010 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sheffield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 158,534 | 130,200 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Shropshire | West Midlands | 74,879 | 63,680 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Slough | South East | 45,613 | 40,101 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Solihull | West Midlands | 61,740 | 53,470 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Somerset | South West | 120,259 | 103,934 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | South Gloucestershire | South West | 75,614 | 63,858 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | South Tyneside | North East | 47,334 | 38,825 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Southampton | South East | 65,446 | 58,222 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 50,274 | 43,434 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Southwark | London | 84,938 | 68,008 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | St. Helens | North West | 56,866 | 49,207 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Staffordshire | West Midlands | 242,364 | 211,210 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Stockport | North West | 87,972 | 75,039 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Stockton-on-Tees | North East | 62,352 | 53,962 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 74,090 | 61,702 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Suffolk | East of England | 162,095 | 135,999 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sunderland | North East | 84,221 | 76,379 | 91 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Surrey | South East | 326,752 | 284,706 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sutton | London | 60,474 | 55,455 | 92 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Swindon | South West | 58,333 | 51,844 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Tameside | North West | 70,849 | 58,289 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Telford and Wrekin | West Midlands | 52,150 | 45,440 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Thurrock | East of England | 54,273 | 46,363 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Torbay | South West | 32,903 | 28,688 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Tower Hamlets | London | 89,997 | 76,669 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Trafford | North West | 73,070 | 62,765 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Unknown | Unknown | 147,186 | 89,875 | 61 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wakefield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 100,595 | 84,053 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Walsall | West Midlands | 81,630 | 64,951 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Waltham Forest | London | 76,623 | 60,695 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wandsworth | London | 96,525 | 79,559 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Warrington | North West | 65,191 | 55,423 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Warwickshire | West Midlands | 157,664 | 139,140 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | West Berkshire | South East | 36,674 | 32,527 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | West Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 114,374 | 101,290 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | West Sussex | South East | 209,986 | 174,399 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Westminster | London | 55,800 | 45,302 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wigan | North West | 102,385 | 85,126 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wiltshire | South West | 111,447 | 94,490 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Windsor and Maidenhead | South East | 41,392 | 35,012 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wirral | North West | 93,397 | 78,223 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wokingham | South East | 46,188 | 41,650 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 77,452 | 62,455 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Worcestershire | West Midlands | 147,322 | 127,875 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | York | Yorkshire and The Humber | 50,782 | 46,146 | 91 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Barking and Dagenham | London | 100,110 | 86,014 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Barnet | London | 211,104 | 174,850 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Barnsley | Yorkshire and The Humber | 136,994 | 114,746 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bath and North East Somerset | South West | 104,410 | 85,313 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bedford | East of England | 102,197 | 87,007 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bexley | London | 126,632 | 108,036 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Birmingham | West Midlands | 593,316 | 492,582 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Blackburn with Darwen | North West | 100,402 | 81,991 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Blackpool | North West | 72,635 | 62,259 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bolton | North West | 161,173 | 131,477 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | South West | 203,952 | 168,281 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bracknell Forest | South East | 69,672 | 58,989 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bradford | Yorkshire and The Humber | 322,262 | 258,134 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Brent | London | 152,978 | 126,912 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Brighton and Hove | South East | 146,715 | 117,711 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bristol, City of | South West | 274,619 | 219,527 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bromley | London | 175,732 | 147,946 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Buckinghamshire | South East | 324,603 | 273,274 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bury | North West | 112,932 | 92,062 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Calderdale | Yorkshire and The Humber | 114,119 | 95,154 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cambridgeshire | East of England | 346,135 | 287,489 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Camden | London | 115,545 | 89,688 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Central Bedfordshire | East of England | 160,723 | 136,709 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cheshire East | North West | 221,934 | 184,875 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cheshire West and Chester | North West | 204,399 | 170,213 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cornwall & Isles of Scilly | South West | 244,682 | 202,509 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | County Durham | North East | 287,559 | 235,378 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Coventry | West Midlands | 179,853 | 150,431 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Croydon | London | 183,810 | 153,421 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cumbria | North West | 260,373 | 217,932 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Darlington | North East | 59,365 | 49,834 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Derby | East Midlands | 143,384 | 120,353 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Derbyshire | East Midlands | 408,077 | 342,012 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Devon | South West | 373,444 | 306,695 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Doncaster | Yorkshire and The Humber | 171,473 | 142,017 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Dorset | South West | 167,871 | 140,038 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Dudley | West Midlands | 195,594 | 165,670 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Ealing | London | 195,703 | 160,951 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | East Riding of Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 170,363 | 141,721 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | East Sussex | South East | 248,017 | 209,961 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Enfield | London | 153,306 | 129,139 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Essex | East of England | 826,537 | 699,117 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Gateshead | North East | 115,010 | 95,479 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Gloucestershire | South West | 302,574 | 252,785 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Greenwich | London | 137,199 | 113,253 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | City of London & Hackney | London | 132,671 | 101,599 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Halton | North West | 80,576 | 67,972 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hammersmith and Fulham | London | 79,413 | 61,701 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hampshire | South East | 752,762 | 632,623 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Haringey | London | 123,567 | 99,105 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Harrow | London | 137,135 | 116,727 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hartlepool | North East | 54,610 | 46,362 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Havering | London | 153,282 | 130,905 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Herefordshire, County of | West Midlands | 82,497 | 69,570 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hertfordshire | East of England | 690,142 | 581,464 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hillingdon | London | 169,966 | 140,627 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hounslow | London | 162,580 | 136,079 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Isle of Wight | South East | 63,834 | 53,686 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Islington | London | 110,036 | 85,200 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kensington and Chelsea | London | 72,740 | 55,714 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kent | South East | 805,809 | 681,269 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kingston upon Hull, City of | Yorkshire and The Humber | 134,095 | 109,858 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kingston upon Thames | London | 104,616 | 86,958 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kirklees | Yorkshire and The Humber | 240,490 | 197,049 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Knowsley | North West | 95,608 | 78,790 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lambeth | London | 160,533 | 125,154 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lancashire | North West | 685,969 | 569,861 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Leeds | Yorkshire and The Humber | 452,999 | 367,607 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Leicester | East Midlands | 221,576 | 186,149 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Leicestershire | East Midlands | 398,851 | 328,879 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lewisham | London | 130,784 | 106,335 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lincolnshire | East Midlands | 359,599 | 299,393 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Liverpool | North West | 260,045 | 208,912 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Luton | East of England | 119,530 | 100,833 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Manchester | North West | 320,139 | 249,677 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Medway | South East | 150,786 | 128,633 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Merton | London | 116,825 | 97,151 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Middlesbrough | North East | 84,001 | 70,908 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Milton Keynes | South East | 160,994 | 137,318 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 169,277 | 135,303 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Newham | London | 167,208 | 136,953 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Norfolk | East of England | 410,813 | 345,367 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North East Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 84,589 | 70,570 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 88,775 | 74,234 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 197,021 | 167,096 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Somerset | South West | 109,154 | 91,162 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Tyneside | North East | 131,742 | 108,233 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 309,037 | 258,634 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Northumberland | North East | 177,910 | 149,771 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Nottingham | East Midlands | 167,692 | 131,338 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Nottinghamshire | East Midlands | 454,685 | 377,755 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Oldham | North West | 137,916 | 110,211 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Oxfordshire | South East | 410,721 | 337,222 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Peterborough | East of England | 123,426 | 103,919 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Plymouth | South West | 133,808 | 110,588 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Portsmouth | South East | 107,157 | 88,363 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Reading | South East | 95,825 | 79,283 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Redbridge | London | 169,963 | 143,391 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Redcar and Cleveland | North East | 73,817 | 61,950 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Richmond upon Thames | London | 120,588 | 98,923 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Rochdale | North West | 133,841 | 109,081 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Rotherham | Yorkshire and The Humber | 143,846 | 120,558 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Rutland | East Midlands | 17,511 | 14,706 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Salford | North West | 145,240 | 116,316 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sandwell | West Midlands | 179,893 | 153,313 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sefton | North West | 147,862 | 123,054 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sheffield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 307,304 | 246,954 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Shropshire | West Midlands | 153,080 | 128,092 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Slough | South East | 96,237 | 81,509 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Solihull | West Midlands | 130,605 | 110,058 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Somerset | South West | 261,504 | 218,742 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | South Gloucestershire | South West | 161,997 | 134,886 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | South Tyneside | North East | 84,367 | 70,517 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Southampton | South East | 129,805 | 107,559 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 95,117 | 80,942 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Southwark | London | 149,677 | 115,491 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | St. Helens | North West | 105,758 | 87,912 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Staffordshire | West Midlands | 502,932 | 423,778 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Stockport | North West | 182,440 | 151,012 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Stockton-on-Tees | North East | 122,719 | 101,763 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 141,076 | 118,889 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Suffolk | East of England | 329,657 | 277,904 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sunderland | North East | 160,176 | 135,127 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Surrey | South East | 737,713 | 616,984 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sutton | London | 119,471 | 100,668 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Swindon | South West | 124,906 | 103,996 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Tameside | North West | 132,877 | 109,768 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Telford and Wrekin | West Midlands | 111,222 | 94,086 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Thurrock | East of England | 100,394 | 86,862 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Torbay | South West | 69,958 | 58,219 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Tower Hamlets | London | 170,870 | 133,071 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Trafford | North West | 156,517 | 129,677 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wakefield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 190,469 | 158,669 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Walsall | West Midlands | 150,870 | 127,606 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Waltham Forest | London | 137,744 | 113,005 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wandsworth | London | 183,396 | 145,430 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Warrington | North West | 127,904 | 106,197 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Warwickshire | West Midlands | 334,328 | 281,400 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | West Berkshire | South East | 86,771 | 72,309 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | West Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 241,521 | 204,050 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | West Sussex | South East | 442,174 | 371,100 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Westminster | London | 120,020 | 91,430 | 76 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wigan | North West | 193,235 | 159,305 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wiltshire | South West | 242,675 | 203,324 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Windsor and Maidenhead | South East | 83,351 | 68,502 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wirral | North West | 181,033 | 151,313 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wokingham | South East | 112,582 | 95,429 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 135,142 | 114,539 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Worcestershire | West Midlands | 299,975 | 254,232 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | York | Yorkshire and The Humber | 102,616 | 80,819 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Unknown | Unknown | 218,318 | 128,358 | 59 | 28/05/2020 | 09/02/2022 |