Transparency data
NHS Test and Trace regional breakdowns, 28 May 2020 to 26 January 2022: data tables
Updated 11 February 2022
Download CSV 38.2 KB
| Category | Upper Tier Local Authority | Region | Total | Total reached | Percentage reached | Start date | End date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Barking and Dagenham | London | 59,289 | 46,587 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Barnet | London | 99,382 | 81,390 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Barnsley | Yorkshire and The Humber | 74,260 | 61,179 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bath and North East Somerset | South West | 43,074 | 37,951 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bedford | East of England | 48,643 | 39,751 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bexley | London | 66,182 | 56,480 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Birmingham | West Midlands | 291,142 | 236,080 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Blackburn with Darwen | North West | 49,561 | 42,070 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Blackpool | North West | 39,932 | 34,738 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bolton | North West | 81,398 | 70,312 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | South West | 97,477 | 80,248 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bracknell Forest | South East | 31,049 | 26,254 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bradford | Yorkshire and The Humber | 145,602 | 123,371 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Brent | London | 83,001 | 65,191 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Brighton and Hove | South East | 68,424 | 57,454 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bristol, City of | South West | 121,594 | 106,840 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bromley | London | 83,850 | 71,643 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Buckinghamshire | South East | 133,947 | 112,755 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bury | North West | 55,963 | 45,810 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Calderdale | Yorkshire and The Humber | 55,779 | 49,363 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cambridgeshire | East of England | 143,065 | 122,728 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Camden | London | 54,244 | 45,472 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Central Bedfordshire | East of England | 72,081 | 60,564 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cheshire East | North West | 96,267 | 85,287 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cheshire West and Chester | North West | 94,149 | 81,011 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cornwall & Isles of Scilly | South West | 103,416 | 86,116 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | County Durham | North East | 144,257 | 120,484 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Coventry | West Midlands | 90,229 | 72,965 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Croydon | London | 98,966 | 80,223 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cumbria | North West | 121,481 | 106,078 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Darlington | North East | 29,966 | 24,555 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Derby | East Midlands | 67,501 | 57,401 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Derbyshire | East Midlands | 195,812 | 163,820 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Devon | South West | 153,045 | 127,804 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Doncaster | Yorkshire and The Humber | 88,821 | 73,964 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Dorset | South West | 70,152 | 58,391 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Dudley | West Midlands | 89,771 | 77,470 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Ealing | London | 95,737 | 79,425 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | East Riding of Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 80,342 | 67,360 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | East Sussex | South East | 114,778 | 94,491 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Enfield | London | 79,932 | 64,494 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Essex | East of England | 383,009 | 328,703 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Gateshead | North East | 56,623 | 48,685 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Gloucestershire | South West | 128,335 | 108,561 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Greenwich | London | 72,103 | 59,363 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | City of London & Hackney | London | 71,882 | 58,331 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Halton | North West | 40,003 | 33,660 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hammersmith and Fulham | London | 50,235 | 40,868 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hampshire | South East | 306,475 | 273,632 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Haringey | London | 66,986 | 53,008 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Harrow | London | 64,400 | 54,324 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hartlepool | North East | 28,502 | 24,140 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Havering | London | 74,349 | 66,121 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Herefordshire, County of | West Midlands | 36,209 | 31,005 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hertfordshire | East of England | 306,259 | 262,663 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hillingdon | London | 80,556 | 67,380 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hounslow | London | 76,997 | 64,399 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Isle of Wight | South East | 26,715 | 23,968 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Islington | London | 56,752 | 46,361 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kensington and Chelsea | London | 34,910 | 26,201 | 75 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kent | South East | 368,822 | 311,510 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kingston upon Hull, City of | Yorkshire and The Humber | 71,225 | 58,452 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kingston upon Thames | London | 44,879 | 39,923 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kirklees | Yorkshire and The Humber | 113,422 | 94,128 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Knowsley | North West | 49,593 | 43,010 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lambeth | London | 89,392 | 73,833 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lancashire | North West | 343,358 | 296,428 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Leeds | Yorkshire and The Humber | 220,866 | 181,817 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Leicester | East Midlands | 102,766 | 89,123 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Leicestershire | East Midlands | 186,378 | 154,492 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lewisham | London | 75,713 | 62,016 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lincolnshire | East Midlands | 168,414 | 140,711 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Liverpool | North West | 143,811 | 117,831 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Luton | East of England | 61,591 | 55,299 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Manchester | North West | 162,276 | 131,640 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Medway | South East | 72,753 | 63,656 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Merton | London | 55,799 | 46,162 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Middlesbrough | North East | 44,271 | 36,799 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Milton Keynes | South East | 74,281 | 61,165 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 83,621 | 67,802 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Newham | London | 90,442 | 70,548 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Norfolk | East of England | 179,680 | 157,867 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North East Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 42,169 | 35,557 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 40,689 | 34,917 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 89,714 | 75,606 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Somerset | South West | 46,081 | 39,528 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Tyneside | North East | 61,680 | 53,465 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 137,970 | 118,002 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Northumberland | North East | 82,056 | 70,812 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Nottingham | East Midlands | 88,928 | 70,742 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Nottinghamshire | East Midlands | 217,624 | 180,421 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Oldham | North West | 69,460 | 59,410 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Oxfordshire | South East | 157,621 | 142,079 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Peterborough | East of England | 57,001 | 48,335 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Plymouth | South West | 61,213 | 51,964 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Portsmouth | South East | 52,489 | 44,278 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Reading | South East | 42,092 | 36,597 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Redbridge | London | 85,103 | 68,346 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Redcar and Cleveland | North East | 39,877 | 32,700 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Richmond upon Thames | London | 49,672 | 41,651 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Rochdale | North West | 66,907 | 55,627 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Rotherham | Yorkshire and The Humber | 76,965 | 66,349 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Rutland | East Midlands | 8,494 | 6,893 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Salford | North West | 81,224 | 63,912 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sandwell | West Midlands | 95,259 | 79,483 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sefton | North West | 79,033 | 65,893 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sheffield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 150,518 | 123,392 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Shropshire | West Midlands | 69,412 | 59,019 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Slough | South East | 42,121 | 36,978 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Solihull | West Midlands | 58,068 | 50,164 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Somerset | South West | 108,329 | 93,349 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | South Gloucestershire | South West | 69,615 | 58,624 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | South Tyneside | North East | 45,068 | 36,948 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Southampton | South East | 60,558 | 53,968 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 47,899 | 41,416 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Southwark | London | 80,332 | 64,006 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | St. Helens | North West | 54,817 | 47,394 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Staffordshire | West Midlands | 228,490 | 199,146 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Stockport | North West | 83,979 | 71,523 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Stockton-on-Tees | North East | 59,542 | 51,338 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 69,634 | 57,952 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Suffolk | East of England | 146,429 | 122,401 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sunderland | North East | 80,029 | 72,467 | 91 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Surrey | South East | 298,237 | 259,259 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sutton | London | 56,662 | 51,776 | 91 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Swindon | South West | 53,421 | 47,426 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Tameside | North West | 68,121 | 56,066 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Telford and Wrekin | West Midlands | 48,499 | 42,356 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Thurrock | East of England | 51,993 | 44,321 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Torbay | South West | 29,787 | 25,912 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Tower Hamlets | London | 85,347 | 72,610 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Trafford | North West | 70,194 | 60,231 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Unknown | Unknown | 138,374 | 83,661 | 60 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wakefield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 96,111 | 80,282 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Walsall | West Midlands | 77,456 | 61,468 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Waltham Forest | London | 72,651 | 57,441 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wandsworth | London | 90,417 | 74,276 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Warrington | North West | 62,423 | 53,067 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Warwickshire | West Midlands | 145,713 | 128,420 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | West Berkshire | South East | 33,094 | 29,336 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | West Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 104,011 | 92,273 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | West Sussex | South East | 189,568 | 157,144 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Westminster | London | 52,397 | 42,352 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wigan | North West | 98,649 | 81,810 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wiltshire | South West | 101,188 | 85,443 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Windsor and Maidenhead | South East | 37,860 | 31,997 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wirral | North West | 88,525 | 74,076 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wokingham | South East | 41,476 | 37,351 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 73,383 | 59,116 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Worcestershire | West Midlands | 135,515 | 117,393 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | York | Yorkshire and The Humber | 46,923 | 42,523 | 91 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Barking and Dagenham | London | 96,311 | 83,028 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Barnet | London | 199,422 | 165,358 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Barnsley | Yorkshire and The Humber | 132,313 | 110,866 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bath and North East Somerset | South West | 96,634 | 79,523 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bedford | East of England | 95,690 | 81,716 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bexley | London | 120,912 | 103,261 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Birmingham | West Midlands | 569,741 | 473,694 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Blackburn with Darwen | North West | 98,202 | 80,071 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Blackpool | North West | 69,754 | 59,607 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bolton | North West | 155,705 | 127,249 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | South West | 190,240 | 157,347 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bracknell Forest | South East | 64,459 | 54,596 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bradford | Yorkshire and The Humber | 309,880 | 248,226 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Brent | London | 146,246 | 121,812 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Brighton and Hove | South East | 135,480 | 109,257 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bristol, City of | South West | 255,384 | 205,361 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bromley | London | 164,896 | 139,241 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Buckinghamshire | South East | 300,383 | 254,354 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bury | North West | 109,232 | 89,001 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Calderdale | Yorkshire and The Humber | 110,222 | 91,815 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cambridgeshire | East of England | 314,555 | 262,718 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Camden | London | 108,099 | 84,685 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Central Bedfordshire | East of England | 149,746 | 127,574 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cheshire East | North West | 208,370 | 174,153 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cheshire West and Chester | North West | 193,069 | 160,883 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cornwall & Isles of Scilly | South West | 225,621 | 187,443 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | County Durham | North East | 274,230 | 224,478 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Coventry | West Midlands | 170,851 | 143,263 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Croydon | London | 174,940 | 146,165 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cumbria | North West | 247,834 | 208,033 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Darlington | North East | 56,354 | 47,353 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Derby | East Midlands | 135,473 | 113,775 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Derbyshire | East Midlands | 385,721 | 323,695 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Devon | South West | 339,950 | 280,147 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Doncaster | Yorkshire and The Humber | 164,646 | 136,499 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Dorset | South West | 154,188 | 128,802 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Dudley | West Midlands | 185,888 | 157,342 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Ealing | London | 184,103 | 152,214 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | East Riding of Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 161,028 | 133,871 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | East Sussex | South East | 227,200 | 193,024 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Enfield | London | 146,422 | 123,630 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Essex | East of England | 781,813 | 663,523 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Gateshead | North East | 110,474 | 91,855 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Gloucestershire | South West | 275,379 | 230,946 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Greenwich | London | 130,346 | 108,039 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | City of London & Hackney | London | 125,808 | 96,768 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Halton | North West | 77,092 | 64,979 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hammersmith and Fulham | London | 73,520 | 57,644 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hampshire | South East | 691,391 | 582,739 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Haringey | London | 116,975 | 94,216 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Harrow | London | 129,461 | 110,366 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hartlepool | North East | 52,479 | 44,550 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Havering | London | 147,483 | 126,061 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Herefordshire, County of | West Midlands | 74,997 | 63,485 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hertfordshire | East of England | 644,939 | 545,686 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hillingdon | London | 160,930 | 133,656 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hounslow | London | 153,738 | 128,949 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Isle of Wight | South East | 58,766 | 49,679 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Islington | London | 103,647 | 80,651 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kensington and Chelsea | London | 68,505 | 52,646 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kent | South East | 747,368 | 633,822 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kingston upon Hull, City of | Yorkshire and The Humber | 127,247 | 104,360 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kingston upon Thames | London | 97,200 | 81,121 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kirklees | Yorkshire and The Humber | 230,325 | 188,605 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Knowsley | North West | 92,594 | 76,454 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lambeth | London | 151,610 | 119,082 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lancashire | North West | 660,328 | 548,874 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Leeds | Yorkshire and The Humber | 432,068 | 351,088 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Leicester | East Midlands | 212,779 | 179,186 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Leicestershire | East Midlands | 379,581 | 313,425 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lewisham | London | 124,208 | 101,271 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lincolnshire | East Midlands | 335,926 | 280,260 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Liverpool | North West | 251,163 | 202,102 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Luton | East of England | 112,985 | 95,420 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Manchester | North West | 309,139 | 241,389 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Medway | South East | 142,490 | 121,731 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Merton | London | 109,249 | 90,963 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Middlesbrough | North East | 80,422 | 68,030 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Milton Keynes | South East | 149,896 | 128,116 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 162,418 | 130,138 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Newham | London | 161,212 | 132,300 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Norfolk | East of England | 375,595 | 316,528 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North East Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 80,565 | 67,268 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 83,954 | 70,232 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 184,209 | 156,610 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Somerset | South West | 99,951 | 83,806 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Tyneside | North East | 126,110 | 103,565 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 288,814 | 242,081 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Northumberland | North East | 169,381 | 142,758 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Nottingham | East Midlands | 160,715 | 125,872 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Nottinghamshire | East Midlands | 430,792 | 358,000 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Oldham | North West | 134,127 | 107,035 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Oxfordshire | South East | 374,858 | 309,043 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Peterborough | East of England | 115,236 | 97,226 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Plymouth | South West | 123,817 | 102,716 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Portsmouth | South East | 101,285 | 83,662 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Reading | South East | 88,075 | 73,018 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Redbridge | London | 162,949 | 137,913 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Redcar and Cleveland | North East | 71,293 | 59,750 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Richmond upon Thames | London | 111,091 | 91,161 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Rochdale | North West | 130,132 | 105,950 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Rotherham | Yorkshire and The Humber | 137,907 | 115,552 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Rutland | East Midlands | 16,309 | 13,665 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Salford | North West | 140,140 | 112,546 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sandwell | West Midlands | 172,645 | 147,245 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sefton | North West | 141,967 | 118,247 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sheffield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 292,441 | 235,299 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Shropshire | West Midlands | 142,658 | 119,619 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Slough | South East | 90,022 | 76,581 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Solihull | West Midlands | 123,163 | 104,042 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Somerset | South West | 238,979 | 200,551 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | South Gloucestershire | South West | 150,340 | 125,486 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | South Tyneside | North East | 80,916 | 67,661 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Southampton | South East | 121,297 | 101,099 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 90,790 | 77,543 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Southwark | London | 141,096 | 109,710 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | St. Helens | North West | 102,441 | 85,228 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Staffordshire | West Midlands | 477,138 | 402,516 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Stockport | North West | 174,698 | 144,668 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Stockton-on-Tees | North East | 117,493 | 97,542 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 133,426 | 112,392 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Suffolk | East of England | 299,916 | 253,470 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sunderland | North East | 153,786 | 129,840 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Surrey | South East | 678,339 | 568,755 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sutton | London | 112,256 | 95,099 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Swindon | South West | 115,661 | 96,651 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Tameside | North West | 128,415 | 106,050 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Telford and Wrekin | West Midlands | 104,875 | 88,883 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Thurrock | East of England | 96,594 | 83,668 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Torbay | South West | 64,158 | 53,684 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Tower Hamlets | London | 162,372 | 127,223 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Trafford | North West | 150,130 | 124,838 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wakefield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 183,084 | 152,635 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Walsall | West Midlands | 144,612 | 122,319 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Waltham Forest | London | 131,154 | 108,103 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wandsworth | London | 171,339 | 136,240 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Warrington | North West | 122,991 | 102,007 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Warwickshire | West Midlands | 312,503 | 263,195 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | West Berkshire | South East | 78,609 | 65,986 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | West Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 223,129 | 189,022 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | West Sussex | South East | 403,739 | 340,386 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Westminster | London | 113,381 | 86,884 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wigan | North West | 186,467 | 154,077 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wiltshire | South West | 222,615 | 187,107 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Windsor and Maidenhead | South East | 76,714 | 63,238 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wirral | North West | 172,523 | 144,417 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wokingham | South East | 102,708 | 87,085 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 129,212 | 109,530 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Worcestershire | West Midlands | 278,116 | 236,250 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | York | Yorkshire and The Humber | 95,144 | 75,363 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Unknown | Unknown | 206,011 | 120,818 | 59 | 28/05/2020 | 26/01/2022 |