Transparency data
NHS Test and Trace regional breakdowns, 28 May 2020 to 5 January 2022: data tables
Updated 13 January 2022
Download CSV 38.2 KB
| Category | Upper Tier Local Authority | Region | Total | Total reached | Percentage reached | Start date | End date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Barking and Dagenham | London | 51,921 | 40,746 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Barnet | London | 82,881 | 67,732 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Barnsley | Yorkshire and The Humber | 61,227 | 50,732 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bath and North East Somerset | South West | 36,768 | 32,412 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bedford | East of England | 39,675 | 32,356 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bexley | London | 58,493 | 49,757 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Birmingham | West Midlands | 240,765 | 195,444 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Blackburn with Darwen | North West | 41,182 | 35,314 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Blackpool | North West | 32,716 | 28,824 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bolton | North West | 68,127 | 60,400 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | South West | 83,482 | 68,364 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bracknell Forest | South East | 25,216 | 21,200 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bradford | Yorkshire and The Humber | 116,657 | 100,562 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Brent | London | 70,026 | 55,439 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Brighton and Hove | South East | 57,083 | 47,868 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bristol, City of | South West | 103,435 | 90,739 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bromley | London | 72,221 | 61,307 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Buckinghamshire | South East | 111,545 | 93,853 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Bury | North West | 47,796 | 39,304 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Calderdale | Yorkshire and The Humber | 45,659 | 41,106 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cambridgeshire | East of England | 114,955 | 98,500 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Camden | London | 46,030 | 38,534 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Central Bedfordshire | East of England | 60,074 | 50,393 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cheshire East | North West | 79,403 | 70,700 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cheshire West and Chester | North West | 79,074 | 68,016 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cornwall & Isles of Scilly | South West | 88,361 | 73,200 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | County Durham | North East | 113,261 | 95,537 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Coventry | West Midlands | 73,240 | 59,008 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Croydon | London | 86,095 | 69,182 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Cumbria | North West | 100,826 | 88,237 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Darlington | North East | 23,307 | 19,484 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Derby | East Midlands | 56,507 | 48,407 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Derbyshire | East Midlands | 166,326 | 140,195 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Devon | South West | 126,666 | 104,929 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Doncaster | Yorkshire and The Humber | 72,867 | 61,224 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Dorset | South West | 58,641 | 48,669 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Dudley | West Midlands | 73,139 | 63,321 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Ealing | London | 80,138 | 66,204 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | East Riding of Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 66,106 | 55,651 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | East Sussex | South East | 94,884 | 78,594 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Enfield | London | 69,753 | 56,221 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Essex | East of England | 331,402 | 284,995 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Gateshead | North East | 45,762 | 39,844 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Gloucestershire | South West | 105,544 | 89,604 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Greenwich | London | 62,748 | 51,821 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | City of London & Hackney | London | 62,840 | 51,135 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Halton | North West | 33,899 | 28,475 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hammersmith and Fulham | London | 43,128 | 34,697 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hampshire | South East | 253,657 | 226,402 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Haringey | London | 58,014 | 46,080 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Harrow | London | 53,559 | 45,071 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hartlepool | North East | 22,470 | 19,198 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Havering | London | 65,552 | 58,476 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Herefordshire, County of | West Midlands | 28,961 | 24,829 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hertfordshire | East of England | 261,348 | 224,748 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hillingdon | London | 67,049 | 56,143 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Hounslow | London | 63,965 | 53,273 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Isle of Wight | South East | 22,930 | 20,621 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Islington | London | 49,038 | 40,117 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kensington and Chelsea | London | 29,471 | 22,226 | 75 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kent | South East | 311,782 | 262,999 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kingston upon Hull, City of | Yorkshire and The Humber | 58,536 | 48,191 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kingston upon Thames | London | 38,054 | 33,769 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Kirklees | Yorkshire and The Humber | 91,760 | 76,738 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Knowsley | North West | 42,844 | 37,343 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lambeth | London | 78,836 | 64,848 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lancashire | North West | 285,903 | 250,590 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Leeds | Yorkshire and The Humber | 180,438 | 149,329 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Leicester | East Midlands | 86,222 | 74,941 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Leicestershire | East Midlands | 157,019 | 130,884 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lewisham | London | 65,974 | 54,037 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Lincolnshire | East Midlands | 139,271 | 116,374 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Liverpool | North West | 123,632 | 101,680 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Luton | East of England | 50,675 | 45,670 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Manchester | North West | 139,284 | 114,006 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Medway | South East | 62,909 | 55,184 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Merton | London | 47,379 | 39,076 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Middlesbrough | North East | 35,132 | 29,890 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Milton Keynes | South East | 60,611 | 49,807 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 67,888 | 55,648 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Newham | London | 79,407 | 61,892 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Norfolk | East of England | 145,599 | 128,555 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North East Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 34,913 | 29,725 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 32,975 | 28,623 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 74,134 | 62,437 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Somerset | South West | 38,063 | 32,594 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Tyneside | North East | 49,910 | 43,447 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | North Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 112,247 | 96,730 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Northumberland | North East | 64,745 | 56,640 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Nottingham | East Midlands | 77,172 | 61,717 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Nottinghamshire | East Midlands | 184,681 | 153,640 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Oldham | North West | 59,578 | 51,609 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Oxfordshire | South East | 127,671 | 114,843 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Peterborough | East of England | 44,694 | 38,015 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Plymouth | South West | 51,022 | 43,247 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Portsmouth | South East | 44,197 | 37,410 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Reading | South East | 33,442 | 29,055 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Redbridge | London | 73,803 | 59,058 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Redcar and Cleveland | North East | 32,180 | 26,930 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Richmond upon Thames | London | 41,618 | 34,756 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Rochdale | North West | 56,625 | 47,528 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Rotherham | Yorkshire and The Humber | 64,381 | 55,716 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Rutland | East Midlands | 6,986 | 5,639 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Salford | North West | 69,492 | 55,110 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sandwell | West Midlands | 77,825 | 65,390 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sefton | North West | 67,274 | 56,287 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sheffield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 123,755 | 101,666 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Shropshire | West Midlands | 57,174 | 48,717 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Slough | South East | 34,689 | 30,357 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Solihull | West Midlands | 48,159 | 41,761 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Somerset | South West | 89,959 | 77,312 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | South Gloucestershire | South West | 58,690 | 49,200 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | South Tyneside | North East | 35,552 | 29,332 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Southampton | South East | 50,694 | 45,612 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 41,681 | 36,257 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Southwark | London | 70,106 | 55,991 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | St. Helens | North West | 46,653 | 40,699 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Staffordshire | West Midlands | 188,584 | 165,960 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Stockport | North West | 71,917 | 61,728 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Stockton-on-Tees | North East | 47,183 | 41,054 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 56,551 | 47,268 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Suffolk | East of England | 117,219 | 97,946 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sunderland | North East | 63,136 | 56,770 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Surrey | South East | 250,605 | 218,347 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Sutton | London | 48,791 | 44,333 | 91 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Swindon | South West | 43,421 | 38,414 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Tameside | North West | 57,071 | 47,232 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Telford and Wrekin | West Midlands | 38,405 | 33,735 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Thurrock | East of England | 45,741 | 38,981 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Torbay | South West | 23,645 | 20,555 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Tower Hamlets | London | 74,066 | 63,318 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Trafford | North West | 60,500 | 51,905 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Unknown | Unknown | 116,939 | 69,699 | 60 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wakefield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 78,725 | 66,446 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Walsall | West Midlands | 62,899 | 49,744 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Waltham Forest | London | 63,524 | 50,405 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wandsworth | London | 78,203 | 64,210 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Warrington | North West | 53,266 | 45,468 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Warwickshire | West Midlands | 118,888 | 104,541 | 88 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | West Berkshire | South East | 27,286 | 24,267 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | West Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 84,989 | 75,975 | 89 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | West Sussex | South East | 156,888 | 130,731 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Westminster | London | 44,444 | 36,018 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wigan | North West | 83,775 | 69,918 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wiltshire | South West | 84,255 | 71,009 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Windsor and Maidenhead | South East | 31,321 | 26,529 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wirral | North West | 73,823 | 62,179 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wokingham | South East | 32,892 | 29,711 | 90 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 59,900 | 48,877 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | Worcestershire | West Midlands | 110,888 | 96,122 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| People transferred to contact tracing system | York | Yorkshire and The Humber | 38,607 | 35,030 | 91 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Barking and Dagenham | London | 87,240 | 75,449 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Barnet | London | 173,853 | 144,529 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Barnsley | Yorkshire and The Humber | 116,157 | 97,031 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bath and North East Somerset | South West | 85,413 | 70,218 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bedford | East of England | 81,967 | 70,099 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bexley | London | 109,277 | 93,583 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Birmingham | West Midlands | 500,287 | 415,171 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Blackburn with Darwen | North West | 88,166 | 71,146 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Blackpool | North West | 60,919 | 51,830 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bolton | North West | 139,510 | 113,704 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | South West | 167,793 | 139,286 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bracknell Forest | South East | 54,455 | 46,117 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bradford | Yorkshire and The Humber | 270,594 | 214,933 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Brent | London | 129,272 | 108,793 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Brighton and Hove | South East | 118,357 | 95,774 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bristol, City of | South West | 225,233 | 181,344 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bromley | London | 145,939 | 123,516 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Buckinghamshire | South East | 260,044 | 220,876 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Bury | North West | 98,267 | 79,743 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Calderdale | Yorkshire and The Humber | 97,012 | 80,530 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cambridgeshire | East of England | 263,807 | 221,393 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Camden | London | 94,428 | 74,461 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Central Bedfordshire | East of England | 129,970 | 111,053 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cheshire East | North West | 181,096 | 151,235 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cheshire West and Chester | North West | 168,791 | 140,710 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cornwall & Isles of Scilly | South West | 198,466 | 165,565 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | County Durham | North East | 231,595 | 188,773 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Coventry | West Midlands | 146,866 | 123,047 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Croydon | London | 156,960 | 131,522 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Cumbria | North West | 215,269 | 180,769 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Darlington | North East | 48,177 | 40,529 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Derby | East Midlands | 120,605 | 101,388 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Derbyshire | East Midlands | 342,422 | 288,280 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Devon | South West | 291,312 | 240,690 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Doncaster | Yorkshire and The Humber | 143,570 | 118,911 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Dorset | South West | 134,164 | 112,381 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Dudley | West Midlands | 158,646 | 134,244 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Ealing | London | 160,514 | 133,053 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | East Riding of Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 138,890 | 115,387 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | East Sussex | South East | 195,390 | 166,610 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Enfield | London | 132,078 | 111,969 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Essex | East of England | 695,610 | 591,844 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Gateshead | North East | 95,634 | 79,380 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Gloucestershire | South West | 237,637 | 200,098 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Greenwich | London | 117,001 | 97,423 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | City of London & Hackney | London | 113,172 | 87,525 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Halton | North West | 67,747 | 56,916 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hammersmith and Fulham | London | 62,648 | 49,554 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hampshire | South East | 592,717 | 500,489 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Haringey | London | 105,021 | 84,780 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Harrow | London | 112,612 | 96,644 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hartlepool | North East | 44,541 | 37,659 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Havering | London | 133,388 | 114,191 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Herefordshire, County of | West Midlands | 63,314 | 53,684 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hertfordshire | East of England | 569,655 | 482,911 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hillingdon | London | 140,621 | 117,220 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Hounslow | London | 134,233 | 112,756 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Isle of Wight | South East | 52,018 | 44,247 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Islington | London | 91,443 | 71,610 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kensington and Chelsea | London | 60,501 | 46,680 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kent | South East | 652,106 | 554,552 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kingston upon Hull, City of | Yorkshire and The Humber | 110,180 | 90,410 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kingston upon Thames | London | 85,248 | 71,232 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Kirklees | Yorkshire and The Humber | 200,698 | 163,629 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Knowsley | North West | 83,620 | 68,651 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lambeth | London | 136,542 | 107,889 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lancashire | North West | 582,916 | 484,207 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Leeds | Yorkshire and The Humber | 374,805 | 303,759 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Leicester | East Midlands | 187,786 | 157,860 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Leicestershire | East Midlands | 332,511 | 274,528 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lewisham | London | 110,793 | 90,758 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Lincolnshire | East Midlands | 289,958 | 242,272 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Liverpool | North West | 226,688 | 182,039 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Luton | East of England | 97,571 | 82,438 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Manchester | North West | 280,745 | 218,207 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Medway | South East | 127,421 | 109,038 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Merton | London | 95,713 | 80,120 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Middlesbrough | North East | 69,543 | 59,039 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Milton Keynes | South East | 127,986 | 109,563 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Newcastle upon Tyne | North East | 141,495 | 112,678 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Newham | London | 147,466 | 121,367 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Norfolk | East of England | 317,304 | 268,302 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North East Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 70,788 | 58,998 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Lincolnshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 72,524 | 60,783 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 159,812 | 136,147 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Somerset | South West | 86,371 | 72,516 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Tyneside | North East | 108,052 | 88,455 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | North Yorkshire | Yorkshire and The Humber | 249,069 | 208,800 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Northumberland | North East | 144,002 | 121,473 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Nottingham | East Midlands | 145,569 | 113,544 | 78 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Nottinghamshire | East Midlands | 380,287 | 315,824 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Oldham | North West | 121,838 | 96,547 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Oxfordshire | South East | 316,639 | 261,770 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Peterborough | East of England | 96,506 | 81,514 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Plymouth | South West | 107,894 | 89,590 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Portsmouth | South East | 89,742 | 74,319 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Reading | South East | 74,502 | 61,853 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Redbridge | London | 146,153 | 124,131 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Redcar and Cleveland | North East | 61,696 | 51,718 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Richmond upon Thames | London | 95,475 | 78,698 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Rochdale | North West | 116,936 | 94,450 | 81 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Rotherham | Yorkshire and The Humber | 120,619 | 101,042 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Rutland | East Midlands | 13,805 | 11,546 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Salford | North West | 126,071 | 101,308 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sandwell | West Midlands | 148,714 | 126,851 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sefton | North West | 126,920 | 105,856 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sheffield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 253,216 | 202,905 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Shropshire | West Midlands | 122,832 | 102,885 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Slough | South East | 78,174 | 66,835 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Solihull | West Midlands | 107,126 | 90,510 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Somerset | South West | 207,693 | 174,642 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | South Gloucestershire | South West | 131,174 | 109,668 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | South Tyneside | North East | 68,178 | 56,998 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Southampton | South East | 105,803 | 88,420 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Southend-on-Sea | East of England | 81,670 | 69,961 | 86 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Southwark | London | 125,648 | 98,723 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | St. Helens | North West | 91,602 | 76,074 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Staffordshire | West Midlands | 414,176 | 349,234 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Stockport | North West | 157,706 | 130,432 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Stockton-on-Tees | North East | 100,102 | 82,790 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Stoke-on-Trent | West Midlands | 114,922 | 96,510 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Suffolk | East of England | 251,466 | 213,222 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sunderland | North East | 130,118 | 109,680 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Surrey | South East | 591,196 | 496,492 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Sutton | London | 99,470 | 84,496 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Swindon | South West | 98,439 | 82,370 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Tameside | North West | 114,162 | 93,953 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Telford and Wrekin | West Midlands | 88,499 | 75,046 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Thurrock | East of England | 86,850 | 75,407 | 87 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Torbay | South West | 54,115 | 45,382 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Tower Hamlets | London | 144,757 | 114,585 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Trafford | North West | 134,149 | 111,400 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wakefield | Yorkshire and The Humber | 160,328 | 133,647 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Walsall | West Midlands | 124,967 | 105,550 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Waltham Forest | London | 118,654 | 98,172 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wandsworth | London | 151,768 | 121,511 | 80 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Warrington | North West | 109,582 | 90,865 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Warwickshire | West Midlands | 267,118 | 225,239 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | West Berkshire | South East | 67,461 | 56,892 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | West Northamptonshire | East Midlands | 192,697 | 163,483 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | West Sussex | South East | 348,856 | 295,018 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Westminster | London | 100,228 | 77,423 | 77 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wigan | North West | 167,407 | 137,951 | 82 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wiltshire | South West | 192,978 | 162,548 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Windsor and Maidenhead | South East | 65,275 | 54,145 | 83 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wirral | North West | 151,310 | 126,690 | 84 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wokingham | South East | 85,525 | 72,756 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Wolverhampton | West Midlands | 112,284 | 95,198 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Worcestershire | West Midlands | 236,908 | 201,825 | 85 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | York | Yorkshire and The Humber | 82,115 | 65,049 | 79 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |
| Contacts identified who were not managed by local health protection teams | Unknown | Unknown | 179,859 | 104,361 | 58 | 28/05/2020 | 05/01/2022 |