Transparency data
DCMS 2014-15 Q3 Consultancy exception approvals
Updated 20 July 2015
Download CSV 1.29 KB
| Tool Ref | Department | Organisation Name | Project name | Basis for expenditure approval | Total Value Approved (£M) | Date of approval |
| Not set | DCMS | Natural History Museum | Facilities management strategy and retender. Review, support in development of tender and assistance in managing tendor process | The museum needed assisitance and support for the tendor process. | £75,000 | 07/10/2014 |
| Not set | DCMS | Natural History Museum | HR - use of consultants to consider the pay arrangements, including pensions, senior pay and pay freezes | The museum didn't have the resources to carry out this change themselves. | £50,000 | 04/11/2014 |
| Not set | DCMS | BFI | Use of an adivsory consultant to conduct a cost benefit analysis of the London Film Festival, as suggested by the Triennial Review | Consultancy spend was proposed by the Triennial Review, essential that it was carried out. | £50,000 - £80,000 | 04/11/2014 |
| Not set | DCMS | BFI | Use of an advisory consultancy service to look into the feasibility of using a recent Tax Relief to invest in supporting Video Games | The BFI does not have the technical expertise or knowledge of the sector in order to carry out this service themselves. | £25,000 - £35,000 | 12/11/2014 |
| Not set | DCMS | Gambling Commission | Use of a consultancy service to conduct a Fees Review | Satisfied with business plan | £30,000 | 14/11/2014 |