Corporate report
Disciplinary procedures – DWP equality information 2013 (data)
Updated 12 July 2013
Download CSV 3.96 KB
| 15. Disciplinary procedures | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not set | |||||
| Data source | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| Resource Management. | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| Time period and availability | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| Latest data covers the period from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013. | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| What does this tell us? | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| The data presented here show the percentage of employees who have been subject to formal disciplinary procedures against their status in relation to each of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; ethnicity; and gender. For ease of comparison the tables include a column illustrating the relevant headcount breakdown taken from Section 14. | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| These results show a declining trend in the percentage disciplined by age group up to 64. Please note that the volumes in the 16-24 and 65 and above age groups are too small to draw valid conclusions. The volumes not declared in respect of ethnic minority and disabled protected groups are also such that it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding percentage differences. | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| Comparing the figures with the 2012 report indicates that broadly the percentage has declined across age groups, gender and overall. The ethnic minority, disabled and female groups all have results close to those reported last year. However, the differences in all such comparison volumes are too small to interpret as indicating significant changes. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| How will an improvement be shown? | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Generally the similarity of this indicator in a protected and non-protected group will indicate equivalent behaviour. However, this will require a reasonably complete declaration rate and sufficiently large volumes to be precise. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Table 15.1: Percentage of employees by age who were disciplined1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Age | % disciplined by age group3,6 | % of age group disciplined4 | Not set | Not set | % of total headcount by age group5,6 |
| Not set | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 |
| 16-24 | 3.4 | 5.1 | 5.8 | 3.8 | 1.7 |
| 25-29 | 8.6 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 5.4 |
| 30-34 | 10.1 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 8.6 |
| 35-39 | 10.1 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 2 | 9.9 |
| 40-44 | 13.2 | 1.8 | 2 | 1.8 | 14.2 |
| 45-49 | 17.2 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 19.5 |
| 50-54 | 16.1 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 19 |
| 55-59 | 13.3 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 13.8 |
| 60-64 | 6.2 | 2 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 6.3 |
| 65+ | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 1.5 |
| Total | 100 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2 | 100 |
| Not set | |||||
| Table 15.2: Percentage of employees by indicated disability who were disciplined 1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Disability | % disciplined by indicated disability group3,6 | % of indicated disability group disciplined4 | Not set | Not set | % of total headcount by indicated disability group5,6 |
| Not set | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 |
| Disabled | 9.7 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 6.5 |
| Non-disabled | 90.3 | 1.9 | 2 | 1.8 | 93.5 |
| Total | 100 | - | - | - | 100 |
| Not set | |||||
| Table 15.3: Percentage of employees by indicated ethnicity who were disciplined 1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Ethnicity | % disciplined by indicated ethnic group3,6 | % of indicated ethnic group disciplined4 | Not set | Not set | % of total headcount by indicated ethnic group5,6 |
| Not set | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 |
| Ethnic minority | 16.1 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 11.2 |
| White | 83.9 | 1.9 | 2 | 1.8 | 88.8 |
| Total | 100 | - | - | - | 100 |
| Not set | |||||
| Table 15.4: Percentage of employees by gender who were disciplined1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Gender | % disciplined by gender3,6 | % of gender classification disciplined4 | Not set | Not set | % of total headcount by gender5,6 |
| Not set | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 |
| Female | 55.2 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 68.3 |
| Male | 44.8 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 31.7 |
| Total | 100 | - | - | - | - |
| Not set | |||||
| Source: Resource Management | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Notes: | |||||
| 1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. | |||||
| 2. Data period 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. | |||||
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. | |||||
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. | |||||
| 5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. | |||||
| 6. Data from previous years not available for this group. |