Corporate report
(CSV) Recruitment process – DWP equality information 2013 (data)
Updated 12 July 2013
Download CSV 3.16 KB
| 21. Recruitment Process | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not set | |||||
| Data source | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| Civil Service Resourcing. | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| Time period and availability | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| Latest data covers the period from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013. | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| What does this tell us? | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| The data show percentages of employees at different stages of the recruitment process for our vacancies opened with Civil Service Resourcing during the period, against their status in relation to each of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; ethnicity; and gender. | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| Application percentages are relatively evenly spread over an age range of 16 to 54. The success percentage for all protected groups is smaller than the percentage of prefer not to says / unknowns, making conclusions uncertain. | |||||
| Not set | |||||
| How will an improvement be shown? | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Generally the similarity of this indicator in a protected and non-protected group will indicate equivalent behaviour. However, this will require a reasonably complete declaration rate and sufficiently large volumes in each category to be able to draw firm conclusions. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Table 21.1: Percentage of applicants at different stages of the recruitment process by age1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Age | % Application received3 | % Success4 | % In progress4 | % Withdrawn4 | % Unsuccessful4 |
| 16-24 | 12.1 | 3.6 | 10.5 | 16.4 | 69.5 |
| 25-29 | 12.4 | 5 | 6.3 | 14.6 | 74.1 |
| 30-34 | 13.6 | 5.7 | 4.8 | 12.8 | 76.7 |
| 35-39 | 13 | 6.4 | 4.9 | 12.4 | 76.3 |
| 40-44 | 14.9 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 11.8 | 77.5 |
| 45-49 | 16.6 | 5.7 | 5 | 9.6 | 79.7 |
| 50-54 | 11.4 | 5.2 | 4.3 | 9.1 | 81.5 |
| 55-59 | 4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 8.4 | 83.1 |
| 60-64 | 0.8 | 5.5 | 6.9 | 7.6 | 80 |
| 65+ | 0.1 | 0 | 7.1 | 21.4 | 71.4 |
| Prefer not to say/ unknown | 1.2 | 5.1 | 6.5 | 12.1 | 76.3 |
| Total | 100 | - | - | - | - |
| Not set | |||||
| Table 21.2: Percentage of applicants at different stages of the recruitment process by indicated disability1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Disability | % Application received3 | % Success4 | % In progress4 | % Withdrawn4 | % Unsuccessful4 |
| Disabled | 5.8 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 13.3 | 78.7 |
| Non-disabled | 91.6 | 5.4 | 5.7 | 12.1 | 76.8 |
| Prefer not to say/ unknown | 2.6 | 4.3 | 8.8 | 9.8 | 77.1 |
| Total | 100 | - | - | - | - |
| Not set | |||||
| Table 21.3: Percentage of applicants at different stages of the recruitment process by indicated ethnicity1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Ethnicity | % Application received3 | % Success4 | % In progress4 | % Withdrawn4 | % Unsuccessful4 |
| Ethnic minority | 16 | 3.2 | 3.7 | 11.6 | 81.4 |
| White | 82.1 | 5.7 | 6.1 | 12.2 | 76.1 |
| Prefer not to say/ unknown | 2 | 4.8 | 7.5 | 12 | 75.7 |
| Total | 100 | - | - | - | 100 |
| Not set | |||||
| Table 21.4: Percentage of applicants at different stages of the recruitment process by gender1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Gender | % Application received3 | % Success4 | % In progress4 | % Withdrawn4 | % Unsuccessful4 |
| Female | 51 | 6 | 5.8 | 11.9 | 76.3 |
| Male | 48.8 | 4.5 | 5.6 | 12.3 | 77.6 |
| Prefer not to say/ unknown | 0.1 | 11.1 | 33.3 | 7.4 | 48.1 |
| Total | 100 | - | - | - | 100 |
| Not set | |||||
| Source: Civil Service Resourcing | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||||
| Notes: | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 1. Data period 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013. Data was not available in previous years. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. | |||||
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of applicants at that stage who indicated that protected characteristic, over the total number of applicants at that stage. | |||||
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of applicants by protected characteristic, over the total number of applicants relative to that protected characteristic group. |