Corporate report
Results by sector: water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH) 2012-13
Updated 21 November 2013
Download CSV 8.99 KB
| Table B: Bilateral and multilateral results by sector (DFID Results framework, Operational Plan and Multilateral results) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sector: WASH | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| BILATERAL RESULTS | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| DFID Results Framework Indicators | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Country/Region | Indicator | Indicator type ** | Results achieved up to 2011-12 inclusive | Results achieved up to 2012-13 inclusive | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| All | Number of unique people reached with one or more water, sanitation or hygiene promotion intervention.***** This combines three indicators: | Cumulative | 13,960,000 | 19,860,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | Number of people with sustainable access to clean drinking water sources with DFID support | Cumulative | 2,240,000 | 5,380,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | Number of people with sustainable access to an improved sanitation facility through DFID support | Cumulative | 2,960,000 | 6,790,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | Number of people with access to improved hygiene through DFID support to hygiene promotion | Cumulative | 8,380,000 | 13,260,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Operational Plan Indicators | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Country/Region | Indicator * | Indicator type ** | Results achieved (in 2011/12) *** | Results achieved (in 2012/13) | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| DRC | • Number of people with sustainable access to clean drinking water sources (number of women and girls) • Number of people with sustainable access to an improved sanitation facility (number of women and girls) • Number of people reached with access to improved hygiene (number of women and girls) | Not set | .. .. .. | 730,000 590,000 570,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Ethiopia | • Number of people with sustainable access to clean drinking water sources through DFID support (A) | Cumulative | 110,000 | 650,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Liberia | • Tonnage of municipal solid waste collected in Monrovia through proper channels and disposed of in landfill site every month | Non - standard based on measured progress | 250 tpd | 330 tpd | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Malawi | • Number of additional people provided with sustainable access to clean drinking water sources and an improved sanitation facility | Cumulative | 50,000 | 80,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Mozambique | • Number of additional rural people with access to improved sanitation facilities | Cumulative | 30,000 | 14,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Nigeria | • Number of people using safer water and living in open-defecation free villages | Cumulative | 660,000 | 330,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Sierra Leone | • Number of people with sustainable access to improved sanitation facilities (DFID attributable) | Cumulative | 510,000 | 470,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Sudan | • Number of people with access to clean drinking water sources with DFID support. | Cumulative | 210,000 | 260,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Tanzania | • Rural population given new access to improved water source | Cumulative | 7,000 | 60,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Zambia | • Number of additional people with sustainable access to improved sanitation facilities attributed to DFID | Cumulative | .. | 320,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Zimbabwe | • Number of people with sustainable access to clean drinking water sources through DFID support • Number of people with sustainable access to an improved sanitation facility through DFID support | Not set | .. .. | 130,000 130,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Bangladesh | • Numbers of poor people with access to clean drinking water • Numbers of poor people with access to adequate sanitation | Cumulative | 220000 1,080,000 | 660,000 1,310,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| India | • Number of people with sustainable access to an improved sanitation facility (in Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Orissa) | Cumulative | 300,000 | 200,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Nepal | • Additional number of people who benefit from safe latrines | Cumulative | 70,000 | 130,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Vietnam | • Number of additional people/women in rural areas with access to an improved sanitation facility as a result of DFID support. | Not set | 140,000 | 180,000 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Footnotes | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| * These results relate to the headline priorities for our operational, regional and country programmes, as set out in the Department’s Operational | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Plans for each programme, first published in 2011. They are specific to the operational context to which they relate, and draw on the most | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| appropriate project, country, or regional level data for each indicator. As such, while Operational Plan indicators from different programmes may | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| appear to report the same information, it may not be possible to combine results due to differences in the data and calculation methodologies. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| ** Cumulative indicators take the sum of the results achieved across the various years to measureperformance. Peak year indicators measure | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| performance by taking the maximum result achieved across all years; this is a prudent way to measure the number of unique individuals reached. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| *** Key to data symbols: '-' = nil results | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | '0' = results between 0-499, so round to 0 when rounding to the nearest 1000 is applied | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | '..' = no results available yet | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | 'n/a' = not applicable | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| ***** Results achieved through both bilateral and multilateral channels | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| MULTILATERAL RESULTS | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Organisation | Indicator1 | Latest Reporting Period | Latest Result2 | Previous Result | Previous Reporting Period | DFID's contribution as a % of total core funding 3 | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| AfDB 4 | Number of people with new or improved access to water and sanitation | 2010-2012 | 14,850,000 | 12,483,000 | 2009-2011 | 10 7 | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| AsDB 4 | Number of new households served with water supply | 2012 | 2,500,000 | 1,593,000 | 2011 | 5 7 | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| CDB 4 | Number of households with access to water supply and sanitation | 2012 | 9,000 | 10,000 | 2011 | 24 7 | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| IADB 4 | Number of households with new or upgraded sanitary connections | 2,012 | 156,000 | 87,000 | 2,011 | 2 7 | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| IDA 4 | Number of people with access to clean drinking water | average FY 2010- 2012 | 33,000,000 | 31,000,000 | average 2008-2010 | 11 | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| IDA 4 | Number of people with access to improved sanitation facilities | average FY 2010- 2012 | 2,600,000 | 1,600,000 | average 2008-2010 | 11 | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Footnotes | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 1. Sources for all indicators can be found at the back of the Annual Report, [Annex XX] | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 2. Where results are reported to the nearest million they have been presented in this way; otherwise results have been rounded down to nearest thousand. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 3. The DFID burden share presented here are not suitable to calculate a DFID results attribution of multilateral results. The results presented in this table are achieved through all funding streams that the multilateral receive, not just limited to core funding. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 4. Result delivered through multilaterals and its partners. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 5. GFATM does not engage in direct procurement activities; instead these are managed under the full responsibility of grant recipients. However, GFATM provides mechanisms to promote and cost-effective procurement of health products. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 6. Achievement relating to around 90 percent of the portfolio value in 2011 | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 7. Burden share relates to the concessionary fund only. The results presented are achieved through concessionary and non-concessionary funds of the Bank. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 8. The UK has a 5% IFC shareholding, with contribution in the past. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 9. Includes in-kind assistance | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 10. Previous results for this indicator included figures for all people receiving support to cope with the effects of climate change. These results did not delineate beneficiaries by the intensity of support given nor whether the beneficiaries where targeted or not. We can now disaggregate the results to show whether support received was direct or indirect. We have decided to report direct support only as this type of support can be shown to help discrete beneficiaries cope with the effects of climate change while indirect support cannot. Definitions for direct and indirect support are given below. Direct support is where beneficiaries have been targeted and the intervention is high intensity. Examples could include people receiving social protection cash transfers, houses raised on plinths and training of individuals in communities to develop emergency plans. Beneficiaries who receive indirect support may or may not have been targeted and have received medium intensity support. Examples could include people receiving weather information or text message early warnings and people within the catchment area of a large infrastructure project (eg flood defences). | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 11. Since the previous Annual Report the methodology for determining whether an election is ‘freer and fairer’ has been strengthened and clarified. The methodology draws on independent observer reports to consider the extent to which elections are credible, non-violent and reflect the will of the people. As a result of this improvement the results against election indicators for 2011–12 have been revised. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 12. The number of countries where DFID has supported freer and fairer elections which are also fragile and conflict afflicted states was two up to 2011–12 inclusive, one in 2012–13 and so three up to 2012–13 inclusive. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 13. DFID is also supporting elections through regional programmes which reached an additional 64 million voters in 14 countries. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 14. The 2012 figures are provisional, please see the UNHCR/GAVI Annual Reports for the final figures. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |