Corporate report
(CSV) Training – DWP equality information 2013 (data)
Updated 12 July 2013
Download CSV 3.19 KB
| 23. Training Data | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Not set | |||
| Data source | |||
| Not set | |||
| Civil Service Learning. | |||
| Not set | |||
| Time period and availability | |||
| Not set | |||
| Data period 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013. | |||
| Not set | |||
| What does this tell us? | |||
| Not set | |||
| These data show percentages of our employees who are at different stages of completing e-learning applied for with Civil Service Learning in the period, against their status in relation to each of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; ethnicity; and gender. | |||
| Not set | |||
| The results suggest that a greater percentage of applications are received from the 25 to 39 age range compared to the overall headcount (Table 14.1). The percentage of applications received from females looks to be lower than the equivalent overall headcount of Table 14.7. However, the percentages of applications by gender do lie within the corresponding ranges for Bands A/AA to E/SEO. Table 14.2 indicates that these bands are the grades for the majority of employees. | |||
| Not set | |||
| How will an improvement be shown? | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||
| Broadly an increase in the percentage would constitute an improvement as it would indicate an increase in the amount of training applied for and completed. However, this needs to be considered alongside relative headcount, relevant declaration rates and volumes, so is not precise. In addition, it should also be borne in mind that training needs are unique to each individual within the organisation. | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||
| Table 23.1: Percentage of training at different stages by age 1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||
| Not set | Stage | Not set | Not set |
| Age | % Application received 3 | % In progress 4 | % Completed 4 |
| 16-24 | 5.3 | 60.7 | 37.5 |
| 25-29 | 9.6 | 57.1 | 42.9 |
| 30-34 | 10.4 | 61.8 | 38.2 |
| 35-39 | 11.2 | 65.2 | 34.8 |
| 40-44 | 15.5 | 62.6 | 37.4 |
| 45-49 | 17.2 | 61.6 | 38.4 |
| 50-54 | 15.6 | 63.9 | 36.1 |
| 55-59 | 8.6 | 57.9 | 42.1 |
| 60-64 | 2.8 | 60.1 | 39.9 |
| 65+ | 0.4 | 55.6 | 44.4 |
| Prefer not to say / unknown | 3.3 | 61.5 | 38.5 |
| Total | 100 | - | - |
| Not set | |||
| Table 23.2: Percentage of training at different stages by indicated disability 1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||
| Not set | Stage | Not set | Not set |
| Disability | % Application received 3 | % In progress 4 | % Completed 4 |
| Not set | 2013 | 2013 | 2013 |
| Disabled | 6.2 | 64.6 | 35.4 |
| Non-disabled | 84.1 | 61.7 | 38.3 |
| Prefer not to say/ unknown | 9.7 | 59.6 | 40.4 |
| Total | 100 | - | - |
| Not set | |||
| Table 23.3: Percentage of training at different stages by indicated ethnicity 1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||
| Not set | Stage | Not set | Not set |
| Ethnicity | % Application received 3 | % In progress 4 | % Completed 4 |
| Ethnic minority | 9.4 | 74.9 | 25.1 |
| White | 82.7 | 60.3 | 39.7 |
| Prefer not to say / unknown | 7.8 | 60.3 | 39.7 |
| Total | 100 | - | - |
| Not set | |||
| Table 23.4: Percentage of training at different stages by gender 1,2 | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | |||
| Not set | Stage | Not set | Not set |
| Gender | % Application received 3 | % In progress 4 | % Completed 4 |
| Female | 62.2 | 62.8 | 37.2 |
| Male | 35.8 | 60 | 40 |
| Prefer not to say / unknown | 2 | 56.8 | 43.2 |
| Total | 100 | - | - |
| Not set | |||
| Source: Civil Service Learning | |||
| Not set | |||
| Notes: | |||
| 1. Data period 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013. Comparable data is not available for previous years. | |||
| 2. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. | |||
| 3. Percentages shown are the number of applicants at that stage who indicated that protected characteristic, over the total number of applicants at that stage. | |||
| 4. Percentages shown are the number of employees promoted by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. |