Official Statistics
Table showing the figures for the number of cases presented to the RCEWA from 2001-02 to 2010-11
Updated 15 November 2011
Download CSV 2.15 KB
| The statistics below show the figures for the number of cases from 2001-02 to 2010-11. | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| Year | Cases considered by the Committee | Cases where a decision on the licence application was deferred | Cases in (3) where items were not licensed for permanent export | Cases where items were not licensed for permanent export as % of (3) | Value (at deferral) of cases in (4) where items were not licensed for permanent export (£m) | Cases in (3) where items were licensed for permanent export | Cases where items were licensed for permanent export as % of (3) | Value of items in (3) (at deferral) licensed for export (£m) |
| 2001–02 | 34 | 30[1] | 25 | 83 | 7.5 | 5 | 17 | 11.4[2] |
| 2002–03 | 26 | 23 | 14 | 61 | 51.7 | 9 | 39 | 23.2 |
| July 2003-April 2004 | 18 | 9 | 7 | 78 | 6.8 | 2 | 22 | 1 |
| 2004-05 | 32 | 25 | 15 | 60 | 16.2 | 10 | 40 | 30.2 |
| 2005-06 | 22 | 17 | 9 | 53 | 8.3 | 8 | 47 | 7.3 |
| 2006-07 | 28 | 19[3] | 14[4] | 74 | 11.8 | 4 | 21 | 10.7 |
| 2007-08 | 18 | 16 | 9[5] | 56 | 2.5 | 7 | 44 | 12.8 |
| 2008-09 | 22 | 16 | 9 | 56 | 1.5 | 7 | 44 | 14.2 |
| 2009-10 | 14[6] | 13[7] | 7 | 54 | 10.1 | 6 | 46 | 60.8 |
| 2010-11 | 18[8] | 14[9] | 7 | 50 | 5.9 | 7 | 50 | 65.8 |
| TOTALS | 232 | 182 | 116 | 64 | 122.3 | 65 | 36 | 237.4 |
| Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| [1] Excludes one case where an item was originally thought to be Waverley but subsequently found to have been imported into the UK within the last 50 years. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| [2] Excludes one case where a licence was issued but the owner subsequently sold the item to a UK institution. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| [3] Excludes one case where an item was originally thought to be Waverley but subsequently found to have been imported into the UK within the last 50 years. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| [4] Excludes one case still under deferral at the time of writing and includes two cases where the licence application was withdrawn during the deferral period. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| [5] Includes one case where the licence application was refused at the end of the first deferral period because the owner refused to confirm that they were willing to accept a matching offer from a UK purchaser. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| [6] Excludes one case which was carried over into 2010-11. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| [7] Excludes one case which was carried over into 2010-11. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| [8] Includes one case which was carried over from 2009-10. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |
| [9] Includes one case which was carried over from 2009-10. | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set | Not set |