Corporate report

2. Disciplinary procedures: data table

Updated 30 September 2014
Download CSV 8.39 KB

2. Disciplinary procedures
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Data source: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Resource Management. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Time period and availability: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Latest data covers the period from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
What does this tell us? Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
The data presented here shows the percentage of employees who have been subject to formal disciplinary procedures against their status in relation to each of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; ethnicity; and gender. For ease of comparison the tables include a column illustrating the appropriate headcount breakdown by age, taken from a table earlier in this report. These results show a declining trend in the percentage disciplined by age group up to 54. It can be noted that the volumes in the 16-24 and over 65 age groups are too small to draw any conclusions. The large volumes of staff not declared in respect of ethnic minority and disabled protected groups are such that it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding percentage differences in those protected characteristics. Compared with the 2013 report, the total number of staff disciplined in age groups above 45 has increased. However the increase is small. The numbers of those disciplined who identify as disabled is almost identical to the previous year. The numbers disciplined who identify as ethnic minority show a considerable reduction compared with the previous year, but this is too small to be significant. The gender group breakdown of those disciplined is not significantly different from the 2013 report. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
How will an improvement be shown? Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Generally the similarity of this indicator in a protected and non-protected group will indicate equivalent behaviour. However, this will require a reasonably complete declaration rate and sufficiently large volumes to be precise. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Table 2.1: Percentage of employees by age who were disciplined1,2 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Age % disciplined by age group3,6 Not set % of age group disciplined4 Not set Not set Not set % of total headcount by age group5,6 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014 2013 2014 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
16-24 3.4 1.1 5.1 5.8 3.8 2.2 1.7 1 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
25-29 8.6 5.7 3.5 3.8 3.1 2.8 5.4 4.3 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
30-34 10.1 8.8 2.8 2.8 2.3 2.3 8.6 8.1 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
35-39 10.1 9.9 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.1 9.9 9.6 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
40-44 13.2 13.6 1.8 2.0 1.8 2.1 14.2 13.8 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
45-49 17.2 18.4 1.7 1.8 1.7 2.0 19.5 19.5 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
50-54 16.1 18.1 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.9 19.0 20 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
55-59 13.3 14.3 2.1 1.9 1.9 2.0 13.8 15.1 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
60-64 6.2 8.0 2.0 2.5 1.9 2.4 6.3 6.8 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
65+ 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.6 2.4 2.5 1.5 1.7 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Total 100.0 100.0 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.1 100.0 100.0 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Source: Resource Management Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Notes: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
2. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
6. Data from previous years not available for this group. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Table 2.2: Percentage of employees by indicated disability who were disciplined 1,2 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Disability % disciplined by indicated disability group3,6 Not set % of indicated disability group disciplined4 Not set Not set Not set % of total headcount by indicated disability group5,6 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014 2013 2014 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Disabled 9.7 9.8 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.9 6.5 6.8 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Non-disabled 90.3 90.2 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.9 93.5 93.2 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Total 100.0 100.0 - - - - 100.0 100.0 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Source: Resource Management Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Notes: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
2. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
6. Data from previous years not available for this group. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Table 2.3: Percentage of employees by indicated ethnicity who were disciplined 1,2 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Ethnicity % disciplined by indicated ethnic group3,6 Not set % of indicated ethnic group disciplined4 Not set Not set Not set % of total headcount by indicated ethnic group5,6 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014 2013 2014 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Ethnic minority 16.1 13.7 2.7 2.5 2.7 2.4 11.2 11.4 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
White 83.9 86.3 1.9 2.0 1.8 2 88.8 88.6 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Total 100.0 100.0 - - - - 100.0 100.0 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Source: Resource Management Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Notes: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
2. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
6. Data from previous years not available for this group. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Table 2.4: Percentage of employees by gender who were disciplined1,2 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Gender % disciplined by gender3,6 Not set % of gender classification disciplined4 Not set Not set Not set % of total headcount by gender5,6 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set 2013 2014 2011 2012 2013 2014 2013 2014 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Female 55.2 56.8 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.7 68.3 68.9 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Male 44.8 43.2 3.1 3.1 2.8 2.9 31.7 31.1 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Total 100.0 100.0 - - - - 100.0 100.0 Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Source: Resource Management Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
Notes: Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
1. * - Level of data too low for publication and percentages are rounded to 1 decimal place, given this totals may not sum due to rounding. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
2. Data period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. The equivalent period is covered where previous years are given. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
3. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees disciplined who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
4. Percentages shown are the number of employees disciplined by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees that have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
5. Percentages shown are the number of employees by protected characteristic, over the total number of employees who have chosen to indicate that protected characteristic. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set
6. Data from previous years not available for this group. Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set Not set